HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1987/03/03 Item 10b COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item 10b
/ 7 \73 Meeting Date 3/3/87
ITEM TITLE: RESOLUTION APPROVING CVEA SPECIAL ADJUSTMENTS
SUBMITTED BY: DIRECTOR OF PERSONNEL (4/5ths Vote: Yes No X )
REVIEWED BY: CITY MANAGER g
The 1986-87 Memorandum of Understanding with CVEA provided that a
special wage study would be conducted by the City to determine if
additional wage increases were justified for certain classifications
represented by CVEA. Implementation of the wage study results would
take place effective the first pay period in January, 1987. The study
has been completed and the results are attached as Attachment A.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt resolution implementing the adjustment shown in Attachment A to be
effective retroactive to January 5, 1987.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Not Applicable
DISCUSSION
The 1986-87 MOU with the Chula Vista Employees Association required a
special study to be conducted by the City to determine if additional
wage increases were justified for the following classifications: *
Custodian series All Clerical/Secretarial positions
Recreation Supervisor Aquatic Coordinator
Human Services Coordinator Public Works Supervisor
Traffic Devices Technician Communication Operator
CVEA representatives were consulted and provided input regarding
development of criteria for the comparisons, data collection and
analysis, and recommendations to City Council.
* The noted classification families agreed to for the study resulted in
40 classes being studied and/or receiving mid-year salary increases.
The Clerical series, for example, includes six classifications: Clerk
I & II, Administrative Clerk, Library Clerk I & II, and Personnel
Benefit Claims Clerk, and is tied directly to the Account Clerk and
Data Entry series (32.2 total positions) .
Form A-113 (Rev. 11/79)
CVEA Special Adjustments Item 10b
Page 2 Meeting Date 3/3/87
STUDY PROCESS
Recommendations for wage increases were based on survey data compiled
for selected benchmark classifications agreed upon by the City and CVEA.
(The benchmarks are listed in the first column on attachment A. ) In
conducting these surveys, data was collected from San Diego County
agencies, except in cases where there were insufficient agencies in the
County with comparable classifications. In those cases, cities selected
from the Mid-Management/Executive Survey, conducted earlier this year,
were used. Data provided by the Association came from a variety of
agencies and for the most part excluded cities.
In addition to the request from CVEA, the staff agreed to the salary
study because it had concerns regarding the City's ability to be
competitive and attract and retain employees in a number of the
classifications listed. Specifically, all of the classifications in the
Clerical, Secretarial, Account Clerk, Data Entry, and Communication
Operator were of concern to the Personnel Department because
historically the City has lost people in these job families to other
agencies and has had difficulty in attracting qualified candidates for
job vacancies. Particularly in the case of Communication Operator, the
ability to attract trained competent Dispatchers from local agencies has
been hindered by the current salary range. In the recent open
examination for the position of Lead Communication Operator, only two
(2) qualified candidates from other public agencies applied.
The Traffic Devices Technician series represents another classification
which has been particularly difficult for both retention and
recruitment. Overall, the turnover and retention problem in these
classes has created operations problems for City departments in both
ongoing operations and continuity of effort.
RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS
Generally the salary study found that the subject classifications were
well below the County-wide mean. In all cases, with the exception of
the Communication Operator and Lead Communication Operator (which are
being recommended a 4% adjustment) , and the Recreation Supervisor,
Aquatic Coordinator, and Human Services Coordinator (0% increase) , the
study recommends a 6% wage increase. In most instances, these
recommendations bring the classes studied to at least within
approximately 5% of the survey mean. Where they do not, a more generous
recommendation is not offered in order to maintain consistent internal
salary relationships.
CVEA Special Adjustments Item 10b
Page 3 Meeting Date 3/3/87
ADDITIONAL AJUSTMENTS
In addition to the benchmark classifications agreed upon in the 1986-87
CVEA MOU, staff has identifed four classifications that require
attention for different reasons. These include Business Office Manager,
Park Ranger, Deputy City Clerk, and Offset Duplicating Operator II.
Business Office Manager: A classification study of this position has
shown that the duties being performed by the incumbent are comparable to
that of the existing Senior Administrative Analyst (including Police
budget preparation, and monitoring and supervision of Police department
Business Office) . In addition, the proposed salary increase is
supported by the recent creation of the Office Manager position for the
Mayor and Council which is also tied to the Senior Administrative
Analyst. Based upon the classification study and class comparisions, it
is recommended that Business Office Manager receive the recommended 29%
wage adjustment, $36,566, E Step.
Park Ranger: Survey data shows that this position is still below the
mean. The proposed 6% adjustment will bring this position more in
alignment with the other agencies surveyed.
Deputy City Clerk: Survey data shows that this position, currently
vacant, is slightly more than 20% below the median. This, coupled with
extreme difficulty in recruitment necessitates salary adjustment. A 13%
wage adjustment is recommended to be more competitive on the job market.
A higher adjustment could be considered but this would necessitate
adjustments to other classes in order to maintain consistent internal
salary relationships.
Offset Duplicating Operator II: In September the Director of Finance
requested that the Offset Duplicating Operator II be considered for a
special adjustment. Survey data shows that this classification is 6%
below the mean of comparable agencies in San Diego County, and therefore
it is recommended that it be given a special adjustment of 1% to bring
it at least within 5% of the mean.
FISCAL IMPACT
Fiscal impact to the City for the balance of the 1986/87 fiscal year is
$81,420. No additional appropriation is required as some additional
adjustments were contemplated and sufficient funds were appropriated in
the original salary resolution.
sr
MGSA
y the City Council of
Chula Vista, California
Dated
v•
U -C
C +.) •
N 3 O 0
J 1- O E U i•/
ALL 1 I I I I I I I r 7 I I
Le) w I I I I I I I I r0 C) l i b I I I I I
O Z I 1
I S_ Lf) L� _5
a z . m r0 r- a) re
41 14
O P4 -C is C U
w w CJ(/) U V) ) v L17
W A •.-,c.7 .0 U to
Z C ra ° '
•r I C (O + +
LLI- F=- Y I III •....1 N N I d' N I d- d'
OW >> S_
W O r v >> S--
C r r a
O U C r
O U o
kJ I on *ft
C')
).-4 o°O N
oo\° d'
E Z CC N. N d' N. I. I N. N \ ; C∎ \ °\°
O W N. O f■ n n
CO
c....)o_
O c
--1 CO o
N I-- .t‹..) o \ o 0
CYO N N. M •-i o\°\° d- o\° co ■ V 1O 0
L .Cb LC) In in •--1 - 0) al O Cl co
>-1-/ S_ S. - .- ,__1 al N. I N co CO CO Cl OC
Oc (n , .._ \ \ >)>l 1 d' 1 CO • Ql C
C..Z CC 3.°. C.) CO N. N N �O •--4 I N. .-1 •�-1 I 01 1--1 CO 1--1 O
O w Ol r1 .. '-' 0
v..1;U 0_ Si A
0
U
r0 O O O O ' p C) O p O p O O C) O
'7 O O O O p p
H CD O C) p O O O O O°•
(j] v w d• O I-- O r1 00 d• CO d CO 1\ CO CO CO
> LO LO CO N
CD Z co N d' d' tO Cr) CD O 0) d' c0 N CO l0 d•
V N N N CO N N rt 1 N N ..i N N N N N ON
>1 1 1, 1 I 1 1 I C 1 I
1 I I 1 1 1 I °\°
w >4 O CD O C) v '
��„ W O O O C,. O CD CD I O °O ° I O C) C) °O ° ° C)
M LC) d' O Ol CO Ol C I N Ol CO d' O in • 1 N
VI ,c1�" Cr) CO O CO p r1 C0 - U CO CO O Ol N N. •-•
0l 1
ri •--I N N N N .4 Cr) CO
rfl 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 44 64 64 r4 r-4
64
'40 r4 64
C `
CA C 1--1 O
•
Zj ■■ •
aY Y Y Y Y Y •V) Y Y _ Y N Y Y
H w O L S. S_ i S i O S. L S- N S_ S- Y
H t-7 r a) a) a) v Cl) O O a) v
I. U r r r r r- � O. r O S.. v Q Cl) O i-
•--
Ed.1 CO H R4 U U U U Y U U v U U C) L U v U U
Cl) •\-1 o Q .1-) >1>> > >l >l aa)) >> >) >, > `^ U
.' N H t1• •r 4-) r-- i-) r-- r rte) r0 4-) i-) a) C +a) 4- -I-, 4-4 >'
H •Z U •r •r U L .r •r r S- O •r 4- •r •r +�
.da ~ v~i °v >, U U U U N U U a U U U r0. U O C) C) c i
O 4) >l >l >) a) >l >) E >l >> >, N•,- >, • >) >>
x w O i' +) +) +) 4-) 4) 4.) 0 i..) +) a--1 a) to i--1 U +-1 4-.
U • C1 = = 0 = = = = U. O _ .+-'
w v CL C L C L C1 C Q C1. a CZ CL 4) 0. CL •rr CL a 0.
4.1 H o a) a) a) a) •r a) Cl)0 0 O O O O O co C p CO O O M CO d O 0 Cl
H Z
ri 0
U 0 •
ral v
_ ut
A v z N c^ C r0 0 0
•r S_ E V) - y
✓ a) [C N +> > N E >> 0 a)
Z i D •- 0 •••-
Cl) L C r S. L a) 0 r X +-,
Cl)CD 44 -Y C r S- a) C •r r r0 CL L C Cl) r0 0 C
6 U Rs 7 0 CD- •r Cl. 0 3 r- C 0 r U a)
O U V) 3 C1' 3 O I) a) O 0 • O
Y Z N CV V) •r Cil LL
Y >> >., >> >) C >> >> C v N
U U U U i-) r0 S_ S. N r •r N 4.) a) >> C •M)
•r C C C S- S- - r0 r0 •r r0 X C 0 C •0 C >>
CC r0 r0 r0 0 Li_ M C7 i C7 cc) U 0 = Cl) a)
Z Z Z.- --- .- V) •'D •) C ) _I
co
N O •--1 CO LO O O LC) LC) r-1 LC) co CO d CO '--1 O
C) CO CO d CO CO d' LC) d. 01 p d- N. 01 r1 •-■
X OM CO CO N 1.0 N O d• N N N N N- CO M
w a) d' N. CO In N. CO I.1
Z 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1
Z r-1 CO CO r1 -i Cl CO CO O N. CO
.`...--..,_.. CO N.■ CO CO CO •--1 01 M' CO - N M Lc) N. co 0.1 N
•T' N. CO n CO LC) d- CO 1.0 01 N. CO d' LC) N.
R. N- d d co
•--4
I LI) d" d' In M d- d- LCD ,Cr Cr) N.• CO LC) co
p •--1 •--1 _I ri .--1 .--1 1--1 O 1--1 rV
▪- d• N. N. d- N N. N. co N. O C) O 01
N N. d' CO N
` , /
. .
a o °a
U O
>4
y 3
1• O
F a
1
U U 0
w v) a
Z z
CO CA a >4
0 C4
En g Z
W
10-1 ')' F U 0
C.) Ew a
0
H H u) q C)
V) O
N
H V H �a
V) H W H W
. 4 a I. 0 N
a� z
0U HH a
CI U a W W
H F
U >4 W H
0 a z
CI a
Ch ►Z 0:1 CA w wa
F- a HH 0) 4w w
k
Fov U H 0 4 U H N a 43 C)a o
W U El H H
Z z cn
Z Ha a° o w a } a a a >
to a H� H o0 a w a u) a
N > - w H a a 0 4 En F U
> > CO H N U a F a: W z H •
a w
w o °CO o) x "H H U H
Q w
r a F 4U a a F x F
y a w u °
F„ ' u w c)
U)U3 a
Q s w a
a cn o u a a m= Z �
C) W Cg
LL L_ M
O N Z
>- M a °w cn
I—
0 w de op pp pp de de pp pp op de OP eV pp op
a H N H
a
v
W
a
CO 0U co el el n E E v E E rn rn E E H H
EEn el cn rn 0 O n O 0 ca• co O CI CI CI Q
CI Q
4 I 1 cl z z I z x '' 0 O O 0
Z z z z
H• co In sr H C1 N M r7 c'1 M o
F O to
O
U r'1 ''i H r-1 •-4 N a In O kp
I 1 1 I I I I 1 I 1 O I cl
z '
Z H
H
F H F a o H w a
!� y z u
a
H o W H a w z 0
F a �� Z
H H �a 0 a a F a H
cn X
a a z a y co a
0 U H
H o w
O Cl) U U
CJ H a U F z ~' '� °" a >4 H
U H ° 0 a. u o H >4 >4 H H 3 O H a Q a F O z W F W H z W Uw >4 F U E U O - '" H F W
o i N z
a a a o w a a w A w as a a a u a u a H
a
64
CLERK II
CITY E-STEP
CARLSBAD $1,592
CORONADO $1,587
DEL MAR $1, 599
EL CAJON $1,454
ESCONDIDO $1,582
IMPERIAL BEACH $1,536
LA MESA $1,590
LEMON GROVE $1,560
NATIONAL CITY $1, 630
OCEANSIDE $1,581
POWAY $1,557
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO $1,483
CITY OF SAN DIEGO $1,546
SAN MARCOS $1,598
SANTEE $1, 600
VISTA $1,490
COMBINED AVERAGE E-STEP $1,581
CHULA VISTA E-STEP $1,410
PERCENT DIFFERENCE -11.8%
CITY 1-
3
ACCOUNT CLERK II *
CITY E—STEP
CARLSBAD NCC
CORONADO NCC
DEL MAR $1,984
EL CAJON $1,597
ESCONDIDO $1,721
GARDEN GROVE $2,174
IMPERIAL BEACH NCC
LA MESA $1, 640
LEMON GROVE NCC
NATIONAL CITY NCC
OCEANSIDE $1, 691
ORANGE $1, 669
POWAY NCC
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO NCC
CITY OF SAN DIEGO $1, 624
SAN MARCOS NCC
SANTA MONICA $2, 146
SANTEE NCC
VISTA NCC
COMBINED AVERAGE E—STEP $1,805
CHULA VISTA E—STEP $1, 537
PERCENT DIFFERENCE —17.4%
* THERE WERE NOT ENOUGH AGENCIES IN
SAN DIEGO COUNTY WITH COMPARABLE
CLASSES, SO ADDITIONAL AGENCIES
FROM THE MID—MANAGEMENT/EXECUTIVE
SURVEY CITIES WERE USED. ;a
CITY
SECRETARY II W/SHORTHAND
CITY E-STEP
CARLSBAD $1,984
CORONADO $1,820
DEL MAR $1,984
EL CAJON $1,969
ESCONDIDO $2, 369
IMPERIAL BEACH NCC
LA MESA $2, 043
LEMON GROVE $1,805
NATIONAL CITY NCC
OCEANSIDE NCC
POWAY $1, 864
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO $2, 040
CITY OF SAN DIEGO $1,910
SAN MARCOS NCC
SANTEE NCC
VISTA $1,935
COMBINED AVERAGE E-STEP $1,975
CHULA VISTA E-STEP $1,772
PERCENT DIFFERENCE -11.5%
•
CITY �Rr
DATA ENTRY OPERATOR *
CITY E-STEP
CARLSBAD NCC
CONCORD $1,869
CORONADO NCC
DEL MAR NCC
EL CAJON NCC
ESCONDIDO $1, 516
GARDEN GROVE $1, 613
IMPERIAL BEACH NCC
LA MESA NCC
LEMON GROVE NCC
NATIONAL CITY NCC
OCEANSIDE $1,430
POMONA $1, 653
POWAY $1,597
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO $1, 371
CITY OF SAN DIEGO $1,569
SAN MARCOS NCC
SANTA MONICA $1,854
SANTEE NCC
VISTA NCC
COMBINED AVERAGE E-STEP $1, 608
CHULA VISTA E-STEP $1,448
PERCENT DIFFERENCE -11. 1%
* THERE WERE NOT ENOUGH AGENCIES IN
SAN DIEGO COUNTY WITH COMPARABLE
CLASSES, SO ADDITIONAL AGENCIES
FROM THE MID-MANAGEMENT/EXECUTIVE
SURVEY CITIES WERE USED. ,p ''
CITY
PROPERTY CLERK
CITY E-STEP
CARLSBAD NCC
CORONADO NCC
DEL MAR NCC
EL CAJON $1, 662
ESCONDIDO $1,808
IMPERIAL BEACH NCC
LA MESA $2,045
LEMON GROVE NCC
NATIONAL CITY NCC
OCEANSIDE $1,730
POWAY NCC
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO NCC
CITY OF SAN DIEGO $1,794
SAN MARCOS NCC
SANTEE NCC
VISTA NCC
COMBINED AVERAGE E-STEP $1,808
CHULA VISTA E-STEP $1,542
PERCENT DIFFERENCE -17. 3%
CITY (.
RECREATION SUPERVISOR
CITY E-STEP
CARLSBAD $2 , 298
CORONADO $2, 441
DEL MAR NCC
EL CAJON $2 , 273
ESCONDIDO $2 , 348
IMPERIAL BEACH NCC
LA MESA $2 , 371
LEMON GROVE NCC
NATIONAL CITY $2,280
OCEANSIDE NCC
POWAY $2,290
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO NCC
CITY OF SAN DIEGO $2, 396
SAN MARCOS $2, 176
SANTEE NCC
VISTA NCC
COMBINED AVERAGE E-STEP $2, 320
CHULA VISTA E-STEP $2,205
PERCENT DIFFERENCE - 5.3%
CITY ° °
CUSTODIAN I
CITY E-STEP
CARLSBAD $1, 497
CORONADO NCC
DEL MAR NCC
EL CAJON $1,593
ESCONDIDO $1,439
IMPERIAL BEACH NCC
LA MESA $1, 590
LEMON GROVE $1, 480
NATIONAL CITY $1, 394
OCEANSIDE $1,528
POWAY $1, 654
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO NCC
CITY OF SAN DIEGO $1,339
SAN MARCOS $1,486
SANTEE NCC
VISTA $1,516
COMBINED AVERAGE E-STEP $1, 510
CHULA VISTA E-STEP $1,353
PERCENT DIFFERENCE -11. 6%
CITY ) '
PUBLIC WORKS SUPERVISOR
CITY E-STEP
CARLSBAD NCC
CORONADO NCC
DEL MAR $2,270
EL CAJON $2,485
ESCONDIDO $2, 489
IMPERIAL BEACH NCC
LA MESA $2, 546
LEMON GROVE NCC
NATIONAL CITY NCC
OCEANSIDE NCC
POWAY $2 ,464
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO NCC
CITY OF SAN DIEGO NCC
SAN MARCOS NCC
SANTEE NCC
VISTA NCC
COMBINED AVERAGE E-STEP $2,451
CHULA VISTA E-STEP $2, 183
PERCENT DIFFERENCE -12 . 3%
r:;:;
CITY
TRAFFIC DEVICES TECHNICIAN
CITY E-STEP
CARLSBAD NCC
CORONADO NCC
DEL MAR NCC
EL CAJON $2 , 457
ESCONDIDO NCC
IMPERIAL BEACH NCC
LA MESA NCC
LEMON GROVE NCC
NATIONAL CITY NCC
OCEANSIDE NCC
POWAY NCC
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO $2, 605
CITY OF SAN DIEGO $2 , 603
SAN MARCOS $2 ,547
SANTEE NCC
VISTA NCC
COMBINED AVERAGE E-STEP $2,553
CHULA VISTA E-STEP $2,422
PERCENT DIFFERENCE - 5.4%
CITY
COMMUNICATIONS OPERATOR *
CITY E-STEP
CARLSBAD NCC
CORONADO NCC
DEL MAR NCC
EL CAJON NCC
ESCONDIDO NCC
IMPERIAL BEACH NCC
LA MESA NCC
LEMON GROVE NCC
NATIONAL CITY NCC
OCEANSIDE NCC
COUNTY OF ORANGE $2 , 061
POWAY NCC
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO $2, 021
CITY OF SAN DIEGO $2,225
SAN MARCOS NCC
SANTA CLARA COUNTY $2,355
SAN MATEO COUNTY $2, 361
SANTEE NCC
VISTA NCC
COMBINED AVERAGE E-STEP $2,205
CHULA VISTA E-STEP $2, 038
PERCENT DIFFERENCE - 8.2%
* THERE WERE NOT ENOUGH AGENCIES IN
SAN DIEGO COUNTY WITH COMPARABLE
CLASSES, SO ADDITIONAL CALIFORNIA
AGENCIES WERE SURVEYED.
CVSS n
CVEA
Agency
Clerical Series Top Step
1) Intermediate Clerk (Clerk II) 1, 376
Helix Water
Dist. Customer Service Rep. II 2, 002
Olivenhain '
Water Dist. Customer Service II 1, 818
Metro Water
Dist. Intermediate Clerk 1, 745
San Dieguito
Water. Dist. Customer Service Rep. II 1,768
Vista ,
Irrig. Dist. Customer Service Rep. II 2, 154
Fallbrook
Sanitary Dist. Customer Representative II 1,731
Fallbrook ,
Public Util. Dist. Customer Representative II 1,858
Padre Dam
Water Dist. Customer Services Rep. II 1,737
Sweetwater
Authority Customer Accounts Rep. II 1,763
Average, 9 Agencies: 1, 842
C. V. top: 1, 376
% below average -33 . 8
2
1/14/87 pb
yl
CVEA
Agency Top Step
Chula Vista Public Works Supervisor I 2, 225
Vista Irrig. ,
Dist. Construction Foreman II 2, 434
Sweetwater
Authority Field Crew Supv. I 2, 308
Padre Dam /
Water Dist. Utility Crew Chief 2 , 454
Metro Water
Dist. Maintenance Worker III 2, 496
Olivenhaim
Water Dist. Utility III 2,378
Santa Fe
Irrig. Dist. Utility III 2 , 466
Fallbrook
Pub. Util.Dist. Utility III 2, 361
Fallbrook
Sanit. Dist. Utility Leadman 2, 496
Average, 8 Agencies: 2 , 424
C. V. Top: 2,225
% below avg. -8.9
1/14/87 pb 6
•
CVEA
Agency
Clerical Series Top Step
1) Intermediate Clerk (Clerk II) 1, 376
Helix Water
Dist. Customer Service Rep. II 2, 002
Olivenhain
Water Dist. Customer Service II 1, 818
Metro Water
Dist. Intermediate Clerk 1, 745
San Dieguito
Water. Dist. Customer Service Rep. II 1,768
Vista
Irrig. Dist. Customer Service Rep. II 2 , 154
Fallbrook
Sanitary Dist. Customer Representative II 1, 731
Fallbrook
Public Util. Dist. Customer Representative II 1, 858
Padre Dam
Water Dist. Customer Services Rep. II 1, 737
Sweetwater
Authority Customer Accounts Rep. II 1, 763
Average, 9 Agencies: 1, 842
C. V. top: 1, 376
% below average -33 . 8
2
1/14/87 pb
CVEA
Agency
Clerical Series Top Step
Secretary II 1,725
Helix Water
Dist. Secretary II 2 , 002
Metro Water '
Dist. Secretary II 2 , 236
Olivenhain
Water Dist. Secretary 2, 210
Santa Fe
Irrig. Dist. Secretary 1, 933
Vista ,
Irrig. Dist. Secretary • 1, 954
Padre Dam
Water Dist. Administrative Serv. Sec. 2 , 014
Average, 6 Agencies : 2, 058
C. V. top: 1,725
% below average -19.3
1/14/87 pb
1
CVEA
Agency
Clerical Series Top Step
Account Clerk II (C.V. ) 1, 496
Helix Water
Dist. Accounting Asst, II 2, 207
Olivenhain '
Water Dist. Account Clerk II 1, 818
San Dieguito
Water Dist. Account Clerk II 1, 768
Santa Fe
Irrig. Dist.• Customer Account Clerk II 1,933
Vista
Irrig. Dist. Accounting Tech. II 2, 154
Sweetwater /
Authority Account Clerk II 1,763
Average, 6 pos.
(not Inc. C.V. ) : 1, 941
Top Step, C.V. : 1, 496
% below average -29 . 7
3
1/14/87 pb
CVEA
Agency
Chula Vista Communications Operator 2, 031
County of ,
San Diego Sr. Sheriff' s Comm. Dispatcher 1) 2, 021
Supv. Sheriff's Comm. Dispatcher 1) 2,227
City of
Oceanside Lead Emergency Serv. Disp. 2) 2, 024
City of
San Diego Police Dispatcher
(no phones - radio only) 2, 225
Police Dispatcher Supv. 2, 558
County of
Orange Radio Dispatcher 2, 061
City/County
of San Francisco Police Comm. Dispatcher 2, 110
San Mateo ,
County. Communication Dispatcher II 2,361
Santa Clara
County Communication Dispatcher II 2,480
Average, 7 Agencies: 2, 183
(not inc. supv. disp.sal. )
C. V. Top: 2, 031
% below avg. -7,4
1) Receives . 35/hr. night differential
2) Receives 5% add'1. if at least 5 hours of shift between
6 p.m. - 6 a.m.
1/14/87 pb
5
,Z13
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PARK RANGER
SALARY SURVEY
MONTHLY
AGENCY TITLE TITLE E-STEP % PERS
County of San Diego Park Ranger 1875 7.0
Riverside Park Ranger 1785 7.0
Long Beach Park Ranger II 2075 7.0
State of California Park Ranger I 2300 7.0
AVERAGE 2009
Chula Vista Park Ranger 1485 7.0
DIFFERENCE - 26.08
4 ' ,
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
OFFSET DUPLICATING OPERATOR II
SALARY SURVEY
MONTHLY
AGENCY TITLE TITLE E-STEP
City of El Cajon Reprographics
Technician II $1689.00
City of Escondido Offset Press Operator $1932.00
City of San Diego Offset Press Operator $1703.00
County of San Diego Senior Press Operator $1596.00
AVERAGE $1730.00
City of Chula Vista Offset Duplicating
Operator $1631.07
% DIFFERENCE - 6
ATTACHMENT B
FISCAL YEAR 1986-87 CVEA MOU
SPECIAL STUDY EXCERPT
SPECIAL STUDIES
A. A special study will be conducted to determine if there are
appropriate wage spreads between supervisors and subordinates
in the Public Works Department. If adjustments are
necessary, they will be implemented the first pay period
beginning in July 1987.
B. A Special Study will be conducted by City to determine if
additional wage increases are justified for the following
classifications:
Custodian series
All clerical/secretarial positions
Recreation Supervisor
Aquatic Coordinator
Human Services Coordinator
Public Works Supervisor
Traffic Devices Technician
Communications Operator
In conducting this study, CVEA representatives will assist in
the development of criteria for the comparisons, data
collection and analysis and recommendations to City Council.
Lt. Blackston will be consulted regarding any increases -for
Communications Operators.
Implementation of the results of the study will take place
effective the first pay period commencing in January 1987.