HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1956-1889 a r
RESOLUTION NO. 1889
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO FILE A DISCLAIMER
IN A QUIET TITLE ACTION
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY, OF CHULA VISTA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
1. That the City Council of the City of Chula Vista finds
the following facts to be true.: That there was a proposal to
dedicate the hereinafter described real property as a public
street made by map only, without any acceptance of the dedica-
tion being endorsed thereon; that said land has not been used
for the purpose fdr which the dedication was proposed for a '
period of 25 years; that said property has subsequently been
sold to a third person; and that said proposed dedication has
not been accepted.
2. That the real property above referred to is located in
the City of Chula Vista, County of San Diego, State of California,
known .and described asp follows :
That ,portion of. 2nd Avenue,`'formerly 4th Avenue
as shown delinated on Map No. 505, recorded March
13, 1888 in then Offices of the Recorder of San
Diego County 'lying with the boundaries of that
property described
Lots 21, 22, 23, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 74,
75 and 76 of Robin Hood No,. 2, according to Map
thereof No. 3488 kon file in the Office of the
Recorder of San Diego County.
3. That the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista
are authorized and directed to execute that certain Disclaimer
and Sitipulation, dated August 28th, 1956, a copy of which is
attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED'by the CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 28th day of August, 1956, by the follow-
-1- '
y�
„a 4 .. „-4 by �
. J 4
ing vote, to-wit :
AYES: COUNCILMEN RaderL Smith, DeGraaf, Dillon, DeWolfe
NAYS: COUNCILMEN None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN None
Mayor of the C ty of Ch a Vista
ATTEST:
y 'er
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ss.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
I, KENNETH P. CAMPBELL, City Clerk of the City of Chula
Vista, California, DO`HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and fore-
going is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. 1889 ,
and that the same has not been amended or repealed.
DATED: August 28th, 1956.
Air _ f a!1 et r.f �-
er
•
•
•
MACE BELOW FOR FILING STAISF ONLY)
1 DAVID S. CASEY
,•.• ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW
985 BANK OF AMERICA BLDG.
2 SAN DIEGO 1,CALIFORNIA
"' •" BELMONT 9.1218
3 •
:.. .. 4
5 Attorneys for Plaintiff s
6
7
8 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
9 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
10
11
No
12 BUFORD-MORGAN, INC.,
CASEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a
13 Corporation DEFENDANT'S APPEARANCE
Plaintiffs DISCLAIMER AND STIPULATION
14 vs.
15 CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a Municipal
Corporation
16 Defendant
17
18 Comes now the Defendant, CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a Municipal
19 Corporation, admits service of process herein, and enters his
20 . appearance herein.
21 Said City of Chula Vista, a Municipal Corporation, as
22 Defendant disclaims any interest of any nature whatsoever in
23 the real property described in Plaintiff's complaint herein,
24 and further stipulates that plaintiffs may have a judgment
25 quieting title as if upon default.
26 Dated this 28th day of August 1956.
27
4101111111,1111,1111111114 28 Mayor of the Ci f Chula/ ista
30 �`��4�/ ay et�Cf
31
32
47.E O5
(SPACE BELOW FOR FILING STAMP ONLY)
1 DAVID S. CASEY
ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW
935 BANK OF AMERICA BLDG.
2 SAN DIEGO 1.CALIFORNIA
FRANKLIN 9.1218
3
4
5 Attorney for Plaintiffs
6
7
8 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
9 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
10
11 No.
12 BUF ?RD-MOFGA N, INC. ,
CASEY CONSTPUCTION COMPANY, a NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS.
13 Corporation
Plaintiffs
14 vs.
15 CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a Municipal
Corporation
16
17
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an action has been commenced in
18
the above entitled court on a complaint of Plaintiff against
19
Defendant CITY OF C ?ULA VISTA, a Municipal Corporation, for
20
quieting title.
21
This action affects title to the following real property,
22
situated in San Diego County, California:
23
That portion of 2nd Avenue, formerly nth Avenue as
24 shown delinated on Map No. 505, recorded. March 13, 1888
in the Office of The Recorder of San Diego County, lying
25 with the boundries of that property described as
Lots 21, 22, 23, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 5 , 74, 75
26 and ?F> of Robin Hood No. 2, according to map ,
ther6of No. 314.88 on file in the Office of The
27 Recoraer of Sa., Diego County.
29 DATEDX: August gO, 1956
30
31 David S. Casey
32 Attorney for Plaintiff
$1. hI1
•
•
•
•
•
(SPACE BELOW FOR FILING STAMP ONLY)
•
l DAVID S.CASEY
ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW
935 BANK OF AMERICA BLDG.
2 SAN DIEGO 1.CALIFORNIA
• FRANKLIN 9-1215
3
•
4
•
5 Attorney for Plai tip fs
:
•
•
6
7
• 8 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
9 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
10
•
11 No.
12 BUFORD=MORGAN, INC. ,
CASEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a
13 CORPORATION
• Plaintiffs COMPLAINT
•
14 vs, ACTION TO QUIET TITLE
• 15 CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a Municipal
Corporation
16 Defendant
17 Plaintiffs complain of the defendant above named, and allege
18 as follows:
19 I
20 Defendant is City of Chula Vista, a Municipal Corporation,
21 II
22 Plaintiffs are the owners and entitled to possession of all
23 that real property in the County of San Diego, State of California,"
•
24 known and described as follows;
25 That portion of 2nd Avenue, formerly 4th Avenue as •
shorn delinated on Map No. 505, recorded March 13, 1888
26 in the Office of TheRecorder of San Diego County, lying
• With the boundries of that property described as
27 Lots 21, 22, 23, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 74, 75
and 76 of Robin Hood No, 2, according to map
28 . thereof No. 3488 on file in the Office of the
29 Recorder of San Diego County; •
free and clear of conditions, restrictions, reservations, or
30
31 reversionary rights.
32 III
.
That a propo . 1 to dedicate the land described in Paragraph II;
•
1
for public improvement was made to Defendants by map only; there-
2 has been no acceptance of dedication by Defendant; the land has
3 been used for agricultural purposes for over 25 (twenty-five) years
4 past; the property has been subsequently sold to a third person,
5 and said property has been used as if free of the dedication,
6 IV
7 That Defendant above named claims or asr.erts, or appears to
8 claim or assert some right, title, interest, estate, lien or
9 claimm of some nature in, on, to or against said premises herein--
10 above described adversely to Plaintiffs, but that all such claims
11 and assertions are without right or legal foundation and constitute
12 clouds upon Plaintiff's title to said premises.
13 WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray judgment that they are the owners
: .. 14 and entitled to possession of the premises hereinabove described
15 free and clear of conditions, restriction, reservations or
16 reversionary rights. That Defendant has no right, title, interest,
17 estate, lien or claim of any nature whatsoever in, on, to or against
18 said premises or any portion thereof; quieting Plaintiff's title
19 as against Defendant and all persons claiming under it,
20 Subsequelt to the filing of tlis action and enjoining Defend-
21 art and all persons claiming under it from claiming or asserting
22 any right, title, interest, estate, lien claim, condition,
23 restriction, reservation or reversionary right in, on, to or
24 against said premises, or any portion thereof; for writ or writs
25 of possession; for costs against any Defendant contesting this
26 action, but not otherwise; and for such other and further relief
27 as may be just.
28
29
Attorney for Plaintiff
30
31
32 2
•
•
2G82( 9
•
No (seep space Below Clear toe Clears 9111oa Sump)
. • Bi3JQ D-=:'c�RG NG. ;
• CASEY CONSTniJ CTIuN COMPANY, a
•
• • Plaintiff
••• .. • vs.
•
• • eTTY--O - iff; LA--Ii It1k, a SUMMONS
• • Municipal Corporation
•
Defendant
• The People of the State of California Send Greeting:To The above named defendant
:>;•:'": CI` Y- a .=.unici a3 6 ar tzon
- • You Are Hereby Directed to Appear and answer to a Complaint in an action entitled as above,
brought against you in the Superior Court of the State of California,in and for the County of San
Diego, within ten days after the service on you of this summons—if served within this County; or
within thirty days if served elsewhere.
:•: And you are hereby notified that unless you appear and answer as above required, the said
Plaintiff_______will take judgment for any money or damages demanded in the Complaint, as arising
•
upon contract or -_-
will apply to the Court for any other relief demanded in the Complaint.
SEAL OF SUPERIOR COURT Dated________AUS_`_Q_ a ,19
R.B. JAMES, County Clerk
By •- -
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 2 •
• County of San Diego. J ss'
•
• -----------------------------------------------------------------------------_-__, being orn, :
g duly s deposes and says
That he is, and was at the time of service of the papers herein referred to, a citizen of the United
•
States, over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to the within entitled action; that he per-
'
. • • . sonally served the within Summons on the hereinafter named defendants, by delivering to and
leaving with each of said defendants personally,in the County of San Diego,State of California,at
the times set opposite their respective names, a copy of said summons attached to a copy of the
• • complaint referred to in said summons.
•
Names of Defendants Served: Time of Service:
•
Fees for Service, $_.__ ; Mileage, $ ; Total, $-----_______________
•
• Subscribed and sworn to before me
• day of ,19
•
•
• Form 219 Co. Clk. 1-56 20M SUMMONS
•