HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1992-16679 RESOLUTION NO. 16679
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA ADOPTING CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION'S JUNE 11,
1992 ACTION ON CITY OF CHULA VISTA LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM
AMENDMENT NO. 10
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, on March 25, lg92 the Planning Commission of the City of Chula
Vista conducted a public hearing to consider Amendment No. 10 to the certified
Local Coastal Program and Bayfront Specific Plan and approve the proposed LCP
Amendment No. 10; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista considered the
information in the mitigated Negative Declaration IS-92-18 and addendum thereto
as amended and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the proposed
project; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista duly noticed and
conducted a public hearing on April 7, 1992, approved LCP Amendment No. 10, and
submitted LCP Amendment No. 10 to the California Coastal Commission for
consideration; and,
WHEREAS, on June 11, 1992, the California Coastal Commission approved
certification of LCP Amendment No. 10 subject to modifications; and,
WHEREAS, on June 23, 1992, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista duly
noticed and conducted a public hearing to consider the California Coastal
Commission June 11, lg92 action on LCP Amendment No. 10.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista hereby adopts the California Coastal Commission's action on June 11, 1992
to certify LCP Amendment No. 10 subject to modifications listed in Exhibit A
herein attached.
Presented by Approved as to fo ~
Chris Salomone M. Boog "
aardBruce
Community Development Di rector City Attorney ~,,
Resolution No. 16679
Page 2
EXHIBIT A
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COHHISSION
MODIFICATIONS TO LCP AHENDHENT NO. 10
Land Use Plan Amendment
1) Special Condition No. 4 of Figure 5 (Recommended Building Heights) on Page
III-lO shall be revised to read as follows:
Special Condition No. 4 - See Section 1. Height Limits of "Development
Intensity" {p. III-8)
2) The fourth full paragraph proposed under "Development Intensity" - Height
Limits on Page III-8 shall be revised to read as follows:
Business Park. A single building up to 95 feet in height is permitted,
subject to special review and development standards, to create a landmark
building as part of the Rohr corporate facility. The standards shall
include increased building setbacks, a comprehensive landscaping plan and
pedestrian or other off-street circulation connections to adjacent uses as
described in Appendix D of the Specified Plan.
3) Footnote #7 of Table 2 (p. III-11a) shall be revised to read as follows:
F.A.R. of 0.75 permitted subject to special conditions see Special
Condition #4 (Sec. 19.85.01) and Appendix D of the Bayfront Specific Plan,
provided that corresponding demolition/removal of existing structures
elsewhere on the Rohr campus commensurate with the allowed bonus will
occur in a timely fashion and associated traffic impacts will be mitigated
to a Level of Service "D" or better at the Bay Boulevard/E
Street/Interstate 5 interchange.
Specific Plan Amendment
4) Appendix D (2) of the Specific Plan shall be revised to read as follows:
2. Building F.A.R.:
A maximum F.A.R. of 0.75 (including SDG&E landscaped parking area bonus)
on the subject site is allowed with one (1) new building on such site
permitted to exceed the 44 foot height limit, provided that (i) a
reduction on the Rohr campus south of the subject site is effected through
the demolition or removal of such existing structures selected by Rohr
totalling 125,000 sq. ft. (which total is commensurate with the additional
allowed F,A.R. on the subject site, (ii) such demolition or removal is
completed within one (1) year of occupancy of the building, (iii) the
footprint of such new building does not exceed five (5) percent of site
area (excluding the area encompassed within that portion of the SDG&E
right-of-way adjacent to the subject site) and (iv) the setbacks on the
subject site specified above are met.
Resolution No. 16679
Page 3
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista, California, this 23rd day of June, 1992, by the following vote:
YES: Councilmembers: Grasser Horton, Moore, Rindone
NOES: Councilmembers: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers: Malcolm, Nader
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: None
ATTEST:
everly ~. Authelet, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 16679 was duly passed, approved,
and adopted by the City Council held on the 23rd day of June, 1992.
Executed this 23rd day of June, 1992.
Authelet, City Clerk