HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1992-16835RESOLUTION NO. 16835
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA AMENDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCEDURES OF
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA TO PERMIT THE CITY COUNCIL TO
ESTABLISH THE PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD AND TO CONDUCT, AT
THEIR OPTION, PUBLIC HEARINGS ON DRAFT EIRS
WHEREAS, at the Joint Meeting of the City Council and the Board of
Supervisors on September 24, 1992, the Board of Supervisors recognized the
authority of the City of Chula Vista to set the public review period for the
Draft EIR on the Otay Ranch Project and deferred to the City Council to set said
period; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council directed staff to prepare changes to the City's
local environmental review guidelines {"Local Guidelines") that would allow the
Council the right to set public review periods.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista does hereby amend Sections 6.8, 6.9 and 6.10 of the Environmental Review
Procedures of the City of Chula Vista, adopted by Resolution No. 11086 on
November 23, 1982, to permit the City Council to establish the public review
period and to conduct, at their option, public hearings on Draft EIRs as follows:
6.8 Public Review of the Draft EIR.
After issuance by the ERC, copies of the draft EIR shall be
distributed to the Resources Conservation Commission, affected
agencies and department heads, others with jurisdiction by law, and
all responsible agencies when the City of Chula Vista is functioning
as the Lead Agency, and copies shall be deposited with the Chula
Vista Public Library for check out. A minimum 30 day period for
agency and public review shall commence with the issuance of the
draft EIR by the ERC. Unless a specific date is otherwise
established by the most superior body which has final decision
making authority ("Approving Body") as to the project, the review
period shall terminate with the closing of a public hearing. Unless
either the Planning Commission or the City Council has specified a
date certain, the ERC may specify a longer review period for full
public participation, input and evaluation. During the review
period, the ERC shall consult with any agency having jurisdiction by
law and persons or groups having special interest. With the
exception of testimony at the public hearing, all input on the draft
EIR shall be in written form. The Resources Conservation Commission
may review the draft EIR and may prepare a recommendation for the
Approving Body and forward it to the ERC.
6,g
Final EIR.
The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing to take
Resolution No. 16835
Page 2
testimony on the adequacy of the draft EIR unless the City Council
is the Approving Body for a given project and has otherwise assumed
authority to hold the public hearing. The City Council shall have
the right to assume the public hearing duty for any project for
which they are the Approving Body at any time prior to closure of
the public hearing by the Planning Commission. The body which holds
the hearing shall be herein referred to as "Hearing Body". For any
project for which the City Council is the Approving Body and the
Planning Commission is the Hearing Body, the Planning Commission
shall not conduct a public hearing later than 60 days after
commencement of the public review period or continue a public
hearing on a project to a date after 60 days after the commencement
of the public review period without the advance consent of the City
Council. If no revisions to the draft EIR are necessary and no
significant input to the EIR is made, the Hearing Body may certify
the draft EIR as the final EIR in the manner and according to the
standards permitted by law, along with the CEQA findings after
closing the public hearing. If significant environmental issues are
raised during the consulting process or during the public hearing,
a response by the City of Chula Vista or a revision to the draft EIR
text shall be prepared by the consultant or the ERC prior to the
Hearing Body consideration of the final EIR. The Hearing Body shall
review the recommendation of the consultant and the ERC, the final
EIR, all public input and review any comments from other agencies or
city departments on the EIR. If the Hearing Body finds the report
has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of these
procedures and Cal. Admin. Code, CEQA of 1970, and all applicable
state laws, it shall by resolution, so certify and the EIR shall
become final.
The Hearing Body may also certify the EIR subject to revisions. If
the final EIR is found to have major inadequacies in light of the
above requirements, the Hearing Body may require that more
information be included in the final EIR. If the Hearing Body is
the Planning Commission, a request for more information in an EIR
may be appealed to the City Council within 10 days of Planning
Commission action. Said appeals shall be made on forms approved by
the ERC and subject to the fee in the Master Fee Schedule. Said
appeal must be based upon the grounds that the Planning Commission
erred, acted in abuse of discretion, or requested inappropriate or
unnecessary submission of information. All appeals shall state
specific objections to the action by the Planning Commission and
provide such information as necessary to substantiate the appeal.
The City Council may certify that the final EIR was prepared in
accordance with CEQA, the State CEQA guidelines and these
procedures, or uphold a Planning Commission request for more
information.
6.10 Presentation to Decision Makers.
After certification of the EIR by the Hearing Body, or by another
Lead Agency, if the City of Chula Vista is a responsible agency, the
Resolution No. 16835
Page 3
EIR shall be presented to the recommending and/or decision making
authority. The authority shall certify that the EIR has been
completed in compliance with CEQA and the Cal. Admin. Code and that
the authority has reviewed and considered the information contained
in the EIR prior to consideration of the project.
No decision making authority shall approve or carry out a project
for which an EIR has been completed which identifies one or more
significant effects of the project unless the authority makes one or
more of the following written findings for each of those significant
effects, accompanied by a statement of the facts supporting each
finding.
Resolution No. 16835
Page 4
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista, California, this 6th day of October, lgg2, by the following vote:
YES: Councilmembers: Horton, Malcolm, Moore,
NOES: Councilmembers: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers: None
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: None
Rindone
David L. Malcolm
Mayor Pro-Tempore
ATTEST:
Beverly Aj. Authelet, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 16835 was duly passed, approved,
and adopted by the City Council held on the 6th day of October, 1992.
Executed this 6th day of October, 1992.
BeVerly AjAuthelet, City Clerk