HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1976/08/31 Item 11 item no. 11
August 31, 1976 . { y , .
� � CITY OF CHULA VISTA I•TEM N0. 11 �€
. COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT $/3i/�6
FOR MEETING OF:�
ITEM TITLE: Ordinance N1703 - Amending the zoning map to rezone 7.44 acres located south
of Quintard, east of First Avenue, from R-3-G-D to R-3-P-12
SECOND READING AND ADCri'�i;,,�
SUBMITTED BY Director of Planning �
ITEM EXPLANATION�
l . Area C - Approximately 4 acres of property located on the south side of Quintard
between First Avenue and Tobias.
a. This area abuts R-3-G zoned property to the east and south which has been developed
with attached single family housing. The area to the west is zoned R-3 and developed
with a mobile home park, and the area to the north is zoned R-3-G-P, largely vacant,
with a couple of single family dwellings toward the westerly end.
b. The subject property is relatively flat, presently divided into 3 separate parcels;
2 contain a single family dwelling each and the third is vacant.
c. The staff has prepared two possible development plans for Area C. Plan .#1
represents a possible multiple family development under R-3-L-P zoning, consisting of 49
dwelling units with parking accomnodated on the periphery. Plan �2 represents a possible
development under R-2-T zoning. The density under this plan would be reduced to approxi-
mately 24 dwelling units because of the property depth and the need to provide an addi-
tional street to serve the interior portion of the site. The R-3-L proposal would require
the removal of the existing dwellings, whereas it would be possible to retain the two
single family dwellings under the R-2-T plan.
d. While it is physically possible to build Plan #2 (R-2-T) the staff considers the
extension of more attached units in this area to be inappropriate. The addition of
attached units, which represents a relatively high density development, without the
EXHIBITS ATTACHED �continued on su lemental a e)
Agreement Resolution Ordinance X Plot � Other+'��=�6-K(2)
Environmental Document: AtTached Submitted on
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Concur with the recortunendation of the Planning Commission.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION�
On August 9, 1976 the Planning Corrmiission voted 6-0 to recortonend that the City
Council approve the rezoning of 7.44 acres located south of Quintard Street east of
First Avenue from R-3-G-D to R-3-P-12 in accordance with the attached Resolution PCA-76-K(2)
(Areas labeled C and D on attached locator exhibit. )
COUNCIL ACTION�
Placed on first reading August 24, 1976.
,�b�
Form A-113 (Ree 5-751
AGENDA ITEM N0. s=E 11"
Supplemental page No. 2
ability of providing recreational open space would be detrimental to the area. In
addition, the configuration of the property is such that an efficient design for attached
single family dwellings is not practical . It is the staff' s opinion that Plan �1 ,
using a density of approximately 12 units per acre with precise plan guidelines would
represent a better land use for this area.
2. Area D - Approximately 3.44 acres abutting the SDG&E easement between First Avenue
and Tobias.
a. This area abuts R-3-G zoned single family attached dwellings on the east and
north, the SDG&E easement on the south, and R-3 zoned single family dwellings and a
mobile home park on the west.
b. The site is under one ownership and presently contains 3 older single family
homes, which the owner is contemplating removing concurrent with development of the
site. The site is flat with an existing drainage culvert crossing the northeast corner.
c. Since the proposed developer of this site has already prepared a development
proposal to meet the R-3-L standards, the staff proposal for Area D covers only the
possible development under R-2-T. The staff proposal would contemplate the extension
of Kingswood Drive to allow the subdivision of the site into approximately 28 single
family attached homes.
d. As staff pointed out for Area C, this property could be developed with single
family attached housing, the difference in density being 28 units with R-2-T zoning and
40 units with R-3-L zoning. The same reasons cited by staff in opposin9 the expansion
of more single family attached housing in Area C apply to Area D. The development of
the site with 40 apartment units can result in a more efficient use of the property and
provide more open space, and using the precise plan guidelines results in a better land
use for this area.
�03
: � I I , • � � .
• � � I I I
__� L_� I I I
j -- r-- i i �
W -----t � � i i
a � � � i i
QUINTARD STR�ET
— 6 4 s �
� � � ' ' � � `
I L--L— � �
; o � -3�;P-12 �
� N i � w
I
I , I I �a
I �
� ' - eo� � '
I I
I -------�
� BISHOP STREET
I
I � � i---
I Q
i �- ------- �bRTN i
� � Q � o'� �
i � N � m
I �
I � � O
IL--------
I
L------ ----------
SHERWOOD STREET '
- seo'•
I i � '<
I I °
I �3�P�IZ � � KINGSWOOD DRIVE
I , � �
-------- 1--- � - ----
,
L--- ` — 6i5'� —'"
CASE NO. �-�-K � HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS ZONING MAP
ACREAiGE 7_44 WAS APPROVED AS A PART OF ORDINANCE
�� �p � �� 1TO3 BY THE CIT COUNCIL ON �- 3�-�� .
DAT E SEPT 9_ 1976
cm c�e K �9�7(0
oR`� BY ZONING MAP — 333 �
CHECKED BY
� � ! .
m
� �e � o. �e �o� e �• aoo �e �e N �� � � � • o i • • . e • '� e e
EXIBIT A
� � e , • o� o e e e • • • o e • • �• • • �• s • s
-� I ° •' d° • ' •'°•° .°o ° e'o ° . ' e ° o ' e6. ' e 'I. ° e ' . '�. ' . • .° o°
� e • le • �� o o • e o e • • p o • • • • e • o •
— -- -�� � e • • o o • • o • • • • e �• • • rs—ro-v
• o o i� �e • • e • • • � � • e o e • • e •
- --- -a• '•° • ' �P�• ° •'� °� °•°• • °s ° o ° . °P ° e ' �°e ° . •e�°. �. ' e • .
. . a p� e e o e . . o a .Po e1. e . �. . .
�. . o ., . e . . . a . . aa a . . . . .� —,�
• o a e e s e e o • • •r • o I• • e �• e • •
AREA�/- 7.06 oc. • • • • d o e • e •
QUINTARD ST.
S
� r
AREA �2-4.04oc. r
� I �
--- = - -J � �
BISHOP gT, � �
.
�--
� � — - - - -
� �
D I
�
v
I
r
.32 c.
SHERWOOD ST.
�
1
i
r
- - — J
� KIMGSWO�, DR.
G �m
_ C AREA 3- 3.3 oa - -- _�
� LEGEND �
i
-- � — �
� CURRENT ZONING R-3-6-P
• • - �
PROPOSED ZO�ING R-I �
� CURRENT ZONING R-3-G-D
PROPOSED ZO�ING R-3-L OR R-2 T ; .
i .� 1; CHULA VISTA
- � m �80���OB�O
� C UNT
.
�
�
� KIM PL. _ o JICAMA 1pAY �
DRAFT HEGATIVE DCCLARATION OF ENVIROill4EtrfAL IPIPACT .
On Au ust 5, 1976 a draft Ne�ative Declaration of Environmental Impact
was reconunen e y tie nvironmental Review Committee of the City of Chula Vista.
The project is described as follows: The rezoning of certain areas north
and south of Quintard Street between Hi top Drive an First Ave . ,
from R-3-G-P to R- , R- -T or R-3-L-P. See attac e p at
� ro,7ec oca ion:
It is the finding of the Environmental Review Corrunittee that the project will not
haYe a signipicant effect on the environment for the following reasons: -
: 1. This area is in a substantially urbanized are of Chula ::_:
Vista and is void of any significar.t natural resources . The
proposed reduction of density will result in a less severe impact
on the urban support system; however, the allocaed development
(or its occupance) should be delayed until adeqr�ate sewer capacity
is available.
� 2. The project conforms to all the long range objectives of
the City of Chula Vista and will not therefore achieve any
short term goals to the disadvantage of long term goals.
3. The project does not involve the installation of any �
facilities that would directly induce secondary development.
The tax of the urban utility support system would be reduced
with implementation of the project.
9. There are no impacts that will result from the project or
its location that will result in the .emission of any hazardous
substances or pollutant that will cause a substantial adverse
effect on human beings.
� NOTE: This environmental analysis is limited to the consideration
of a proposed down zoning of the project site and does not cover
precise development plans.
Project Perspective
A. The elementary and junior high schools are currently
over-populated in the subject area and will continue to
be so burdened in the future as a result of residential
growth until such time as the school districts deem
.. _ , additional facilities necessary and funding is appropriated. . __,.
B. Park district No. 6 . 05 is void of any substantial
neighborhood park facilities and as the local population
increases so does the need for adequate parklands . In
an effort to provide neighborhood park facilities the
City staff is currently investigating the possible develop-
ment of San Diego Gas 6 Electric Company' s easement . _
_. __ .... 10
Information for the Initial Study was prepared by: • - �-
Citv of Chula Vista Planning Dept. P.O. Box u a is a ,
The Initial Study Application and Evaluation is on file with the Environmental
Revieta Coordinator of the City of Chula 4ista and may be revie�•red at the planning
Department of the City of Chula Vista between 8:00 a.m, and 5:00 p,m.
� ���
� E ironme Revie�a Cooraina or
0
G1SE NUPI4ER is-76-50
Date August 5 , 1976
EN 3 (rev. 3-20-75)
. ' , �. � . � 5 �
. RESOLUTION �;0. PCZ-76-K (2) � � �
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLMlNING COi�iMiSSIOF! RECO"u•1ENDING TO
THE CITY COUIdCII THE CHAIJGE OF ZONE FOR APPROXIFIATELY 7.44 ACRES
LOCATED SOUTH OF QUINTARD EAST OF FIRST AVEIIUE FROM R-3-G-D TO
R-3-P-12
41HEREAS, on July 6, 1976 the City Council considered a recorsnendation by the
City Planning CoRmission that 7.44 acres located south of Quintard, east of First
Avenue be rezoned to R-3-G-P-15 and referred the proposal back to the Planning
Commission for consideration of R-3-L-P or R-2-T zoning, and
4lHEREAS, Initial Study IS-76-50, conducted by the Environmental Revie�a
Committee, concluded on August 5, 1976 that there would be no significant adverse
environmental impact as the result of this rezoning action, and
t•lHEREAS, the City Planning Cormiission set the time and place for a hearing
on said zone change, and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was
�/ given by the publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City at
least 10 days prior to the date of said hearing, and
l•lHEREAS, a hearing was h'eld at the time and place as advertised, namely
7:00 p.m. , August 9, 1976, before the Pianning Comnission and said hearing was
therezfter cicsed.
�OW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLO�JS:
1. From facts presented to the Cortmission, the Coimnission finds that public
necessity, convenience, general vielfare and good zoning practice require the
change of zone for approxinately 7.44 acres located south of Quintard Street,
- east of First Avenue (areas C and D on attached plat) from R-3-G-D to R-3-P-12
with the following development standards:
a. Desirable guidelines for setbacks shall be:
Front - 25 feet (adjacent to Quintard, Tobias or First Avenue)
Abutting duplex area - Single story structure - 15 feet
- Two story - 35 feet (except when abutting
SDGBE, then reduce to 5 feet)
Upon review of a particular plan, setbacks may be increased or
decreased on the basis of:
(1) Orientation of building
(2) Location of riindovis
(3) Length of building along a property line
��3 (4) Location and height of structure on adjacent lot.
b. Usable Open Space:
800 sq. ft. of usable open space per unit distributed as
follows:
Ground floor - 300 sq. ft. of private open space
Second floor - 700 sq. ft. of private open space
Remainder as comnon open space.
Yards abuttin5 a street do not qualify.
c. Fencing:
Fencing shall be required at the top of slope adjacent to
existing residentia7 area.
d. hfaximum height: 2 stories
e. I;o occupancy shall be allowed unless proper sewerege and drainage
/'
are provided.
2. The findings of fact in support of said determination are as follows:
a. The present R-3-G (77 units per acre) zoning is in conflict with
the intent of the Council action taken in 1968 to limit the maximum
density of the area to 15.5 units per acre.
b. Attachment of the "P" Ftodifying District will provide appropriate
control to achieve a proper relationship among the uses allowed in
the adjacent zones.
3. The Planning Cortmission reco�miends to the City Council that said change
" of zone be granted. '
4. That this resolution be transnitted to the City Council .
- PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PLANNING CIX•iMISSION OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFOW�IA
this 9th day of August, 1976 by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES: Cortmissioners Starr, Pressutti , Chandler, Smith, Floto, and G. Johnson
NOES: None
ABSENT: Cortmissioner R. Johnson �
I�f �..�, A � ' ��'��
Chairman
ATTEST:
�ei%�v °/7�xif',c?�
J Secretary
�o
� � �� � ; . __ _ � �_
I r ,_J
• ��
.
._J /
"�"�� `-� �� "'• -- � � — - PAISI_ f_Y STi:EfiT
..� �.
t�TID��Qf B' — v I I .
1 '
• . � I I I � I ' I I I I r- I ci-- ' � I
i��!(15F_CT STi(:4T P12O5 ""'" PHOS{�CCT
I � ..� . _..� � \ ;--
� �' W PROJECT
PROVEf1�E- r Y'+�•i H -- �
CASTLE PARK ' �' �T � LOCATOR
\\ PCZ-T6-K
` � REZONE V ROUS
. PARCELS FRC!A
J . F- ; � � � R3-G-D fi R3�G-a .
� a � � � TO R-3-P-12,R4 T
� � � --- � �' O O i O �..��--- 8 R-I�
(� ;i � � � � `-- - -
OUINTARD �STREET CAST�E P�RY.
, , �
�
I '
� l I � —�
� ' - -- � —
. . � . � - I � -- � ��
' . � � ' .1 ' . � .
� ' I '
. � , 'i
. I N P L �
� �
, ��- -- - - ,.. I �.�
. , � o
, . ;, _ �
� � . LL J
� � - - - - � ���=' - - - - - - - - - - - _
SHEF":CG� ST. I G RIENS�fRA S
j a
I I
�
. � . �p�Tk ' � _ _ � o I �
r.racs�•,00 oa..
` �•� � ' O � � � � Y i�/EP.�1
� _ _ _ " _' � I
�- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _
, ` l� oQO� �f�� _ _ � �
�__
1
J� _ �
. �
i '
_�m ��vv_
�
� � � - �� :�: � ,. ,
. :.,:��:�
.;:: .:_.
� . f A Vv4Y �- _`:�' LCMA�
� � � � •'• VERDE
` � � ��� O � �'� \� " LOA1A VERDE -;';. PARI(
� 'pq�v/1 � : �
�P � ' :i:,
/ Vr� � � ` � 3, ;� �, ''' _
i�f .
� � � �
� �' '�� �� 4 Q � - - - -
. � �F � E ;.;_` r,
� �,. c ,;. :
\ \ ` ` ` �� / � u7 / r�r�� 'f _.�f..
i• � i� J. � \ / �' � �..�f.-�.
� 1 ,' ^ ..
� .- ` . , i�' r�' ..%'.
� • i�:,� " . _ "
. ` ' �� '� � \� � Q/�q u c�', ��-` "� -
�; �� � Ta i� ;J� ' �VGe .. "''•' ;,
;�0 � N� ,n�/�y� ' \ / �\/V� �, ^'`�� ,f
. . L�� w i.i � ' \i � _
.. . .. .. .. . ,
. ,
. .. . . . .
�� . _.. -- . . - --- , - .
.
.
.
� �. - - ..- _...y-_;--_---___--__- --- - -- - � `�
_., _. _. _ _ _ � ._.
�i�q � r .. _ . �
-. . �:�,� ������ _._ . ._ �g���� �.. _.-----
� ,
�_
. .�_------ _._ ..___� --_.
�._r _ __ _
_ ... . _�
-----__--Y.. ----�-- , _�.��_--__._- - -_..._ .
- ---- _ _ ... ___. . .
�i� �� �'��� � \ � � ���+,� sh��t�,�s f � I
� I
I ' � �] 1\\���� � , ��� �
! . I ���`�; � ����. ����� � � ��
i \ '> ;;� � '`'�\ • � � � �
. G b � l � \� ja r• �
� ; �, l; s � � �,
� � � �
k �f � \ �I �
` � c :4 pa� i � l Porkinq . � , �. NORrti
�� ! F.�,� � �\ . 1 ��
� tr' r f �---�r-�� ' �-u-� , @,; r
' �a,i� � +� i � ! e� �
� F o � , I( �� �
I �` I I � \ I N � • � ` ' II1 �� I
1.�J � �` ��`
\ 1
�, � p� I �YCI XU I�\ �ILG' �1 I� NV U�ITJ
I i � a — G��fiwr; C
�
`—' ` T � � STAFF
� i ., I � '�� I . ' PROPOSAL
! � � ( _� ��o I � AREA C (I)
i � 1 � �� ..` ,
I', �" _ � '_' __ _ " .
� I�
o ui
«.Y.:.— . --•--
. . , , . . ' vaev+�c ��.
�a�
n
v � �
i� - k
r
�
m v o r o 0 0 0 0 ,� „ ,2 � o �
,
`' _ �
m
, _ _ CNDOO'aPl�
, � L �C�Q`�VnPM.i' , i '—
. � i
�1'r
I
STAFF c � � 0 � � C"•�) �z � �° C� � � � ��
FP,UPO�AL
AF'iEL! D
o �so' �ro'
�--�_,.
vaa�uic sca�
. . �UpR •
�-H ,
�
�
l
� , , k
�r ,
� . ,..... .
y _
, -' — . � '
� _
�;''i. ' �--..�..�-.-...--...�._�.._...'': 1'�:...=,ai
. . . �� 1 i� F`I''.5,�. Gi; ' ��,�'.�.,� . . ' . .
--- ._._.. �-,,,�J� ��l � �_'.'_a� ---- ---�--�' � �� ��. - -----.._.
- ,�-'�_:— , . .-- �t _—�. __.. �_ _ — — �--- - - - ,
_ - --- .. .
I Fl,q P � - -- �;,\— --� ---- -- - —' �.. ; �
; ;�_; �� � � \ o{� � ° ° �� ° � r o � '' : � _
1C` � � �,d �
� r- � � I , � � `�
. � ! �\ I--� � C� . !�� O � =� �.
�; \ � 6^��
� � � 4' � �. ' �� 1 .
<. , Q:(r�1rY� ' ['� i
� 1 � ` � � '�S{�YLrfUfeS .r-.a �
� �.� � � �''� STAFF
4f1 � '�i I p � � If \ n O � II, j'; FE�O^r0.ri�L
j , i _ I \ i,� , i a.REa c cz�
f � ' � �
�„� ' � I � o l, E�
i > � . I � �a, \ ,� I � � � �
E� �'->' ` 'i s:� �
4 � I .�.`�. O ' C y ! �
�
��, p���:.ec(�� �,�� � \ �'r0� � � li, �.� �"� ��R�.�Y
i I Co✓1''oor3 �, � O Cu�• e�:x�C � , ,�
i � . ��o�� i�, �-� ;
,� ' -�- `-- ° j
� � �-- . I � d � �
�
, i � �,. o �� � -- . --
� °�� _ _ _ _ ���-- _ � =� �� � � �
i� � _ � �:o=�, ,
�_ —�.�.�
- p7 � \� �..c� ue��hi� ulau ` .
I : �
• Ii ' , '
r'�
n