HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1974/02/14 Item 19Agenda Item No. 19
February 14, 1974
Ordinance 1524 Y'«`:.x'_^��*'i—v�s.e<.r.--�.�v�.....�ec.:<xr+�-���n.;_s-.r-_r-��.»- ' �- .'.y.,.�A-..p.�. ., _ _ ' ' -.:zr� . ' - '
��I.:e: - _ .- ' . '" ' ,'r . _ _ - - . . . ' .
. . _ ' _" .: . - .. . . . - ' . . "AGENDA' ITEMF A'0. � [ '19y.�., .
: � - . : . . , - _.
CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL rfEET??dG OF: February '14; 1974
ITEAiTITL"c: Ordinance No. 1524 - Rezoning that certain property located
. - • in the Bayfront Area from I to P-C, R=3-H-P and C-V-P -
. Second _reading and adoption '
I�IT:ATED 'nY: City Attorney. "
' . SACvGRGU\D .
` The ordinance was placed on first reading at the
meeting �of Februa=y 5, 1974 .
� � t
;�.'i':."vC',-:�D: , Raso'_uticii � ; �3:raZC^ �X{ :gr_c�eii� _ _ ; ' . _.__ [ 1
� . . - '.. ��.o �X.`.-;i�Ii� ` I �'�.
� _ .
..�,._
� ' � '.'_ri2.^_Cl�l o_�_e;�,e,1t: �. ' , . ' _. N.A.. • � � � �
- - ��6?C:i1155:.^^-60�^� h?CC:R:'E?.^.da'�on: ' ' N:A.'� . - . ' � : . . -
� � J'•+'O�i��°:7L �E2.'. P.ecnnre,car; on; Place oadinance on� second reading - �
, . .and adoption.
' . - - ;4ar.s�,sr Gnc�-:�c-�:��y�.�• �oncur .
- ='-- � . :
/��.: • �' i _ . . . _' , .. _ . ' . � -. . - _
: . . .. . . ,
-_"�--""°''=�'��-:-T'�''.::--._.�..t.�_ .-----,�^-..�.;-•:-�r,--,._:^f-.-r-,-°�r-��_.-�r T.<_.--�- _ -- --�.�-. _ .-. . _ ._ - - � -
_ *:`;:,. :r__., y_... :" ,_ .. -- . _ _.- . _ • . '^•AGENDA ITEPt'N0. _� 18��`).. ' '
"-t :. - , . . _ .
�" CHULA VISTA"CI1'Y COUNCIL D1EET?NG OF: February 5, 1974. '
ITED1 TITL"c: Ordinance - Rezoning that Certain'Property� Located ,in the Bayfront , ,
_ _ Area from I to P-C, R-3-H-P and.C-V-P� -
INITIATED 'nY: �City Attorney . - - •
BACKGROUND �
' The City Attorney requests that the ordinance adopted on second reading on
January 22', 1974 relative to the Beyfront• rezoning be placed on first reading _
- and reenacted as amended: •
The"P}anning Comnission during their hearings had recommended the inclusion of
certain Tidelands areas in the rezoning proposal for the .entire Bayfront area.
As Council 'is aware, the •Tidelands, pursuant to the San Diego Unified Port District .
Act, _can.,be zoned tiy the several municipalities composing the, 5an Diego Un.ified.
Port District to and until April 5, 1962. Prior to that date, the City of Chula
Vista adopted a T zone or Tidelands zone into which all of said property under the
jurisdiction of the City of Chula Vista was incorporated. The City may not by law �
,- amend"or alter that zoning as it existed pribr to Apri1 ;5, 1962. : �
The Deputy City Attorney, who was at the Planning .Corrmission meeting, was not aware
of- that provision. It does not appear, however, even if the City could .legally '
� attach the p,recise plan. requirement to. the Tidelands•area that any significant
change in the City' s zoning control span would be affected.
The iidelands zone itself is not a typical zoning device. It simply authorizes
those uses' which _are authorized by the Tidelands _trust. It is recognized that
- nothing more, or less in the way of uses could'be authorized. The Tidelands zone
does provide' that any development of such uses must be reviewed by the Planning
Commission and -the City 'Councii ' of the City of Chula Vista. This necessarily
involves submission' of precise plans or the equivalent '[hereof.
" . (continued)
_ A.T!'nCl-iED: Rasolution f ; C_-dir.aZCe [X� � Agreenent � � Pl�t ( 1
. .
" �Sc� �XIII3I25 �j "?�: 1
. C;.aar.cial Statenent:'. N/A . . � -
Ce.TMaisszor.-6oar3 Feccmmendation: ' N/A • - . ' , " :
� .. ' ' . �. ' . . .
' Jleuar.tnent Head Recon.�endaticn: Place Ordi,nance� on. First;Reading
� . , , �� . , � • - . . . . :
_ _ , ,. . .
. • `:_2' ;da:,a;er Reco;�er.dacier.• Coneur _ ' . ' , ' -.
. . . � - - � . . . . ' . . . .:� - , " .` =
. . � `_. : . - ; - ' - . . _ _. . . - . .
, ' . - �i- � _ _. .. - . � . . _ • - � - . .� .. ' ) ,� .... � � _ " - . . - -
. `Y . ' . - �. � ' ' . _ ,` ' _. ^ . � " ' . . . . . . . . . . - .
. i - � r . ' ` . _ _ .
Agenda I [em No. 18 .
Page Two
.
• _ r
In the past 12 years, the City has only reviewed development plans on a
limited number of occasions. This office recalls only a wash room and
some warehouses. In light of this fiisEory� to' give `insurance to the Port
Cortmission that the Lity wishes to continue its excellent relationship
with the Comnission and adhere closely to both the State law and our
own local ordinances, it is recomnended [hat the ordinance be appropri-
ately amended.
An amendment of this nature does not require that the matter be referred
back to the Planning Commission for a report nor is it necessary to reopen
the public hearing. The attached ordinance is available to be acted upon
first reading at the present time.
.��