HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1974 /02/14 Item 19Item No. 19
February 14, 1974
Ordinance No. 1524
Bayfront Area �iV�.��.-^.w-s-a�s-.m,.,��.-.es�qc.a�;wr+.�.-...w:�s��..--rr.—�.k--w.:w--<�...�,.�..;..ss.9;5�:.v,-.. . .
, .__ . _. ._� i ...;. . . _ . j_ . .. ..- __ - " _ __ c .�•�...r:xv�r._.,......_n - .
- �.' 1;_. . ' ' ' ' 'r .�� _ ' ' •-� .'� ',-� � ' - ' ' .
. ..' . - . . . . .. � '. . ' � -_ �'AGENDA ITEM A'0: [ 19Y ] .,
� CHULA VISTA CITY COUDICIL �IEET??dG OF: February 14; 1974
JT£61TITLc: Ordinance No. 1524 - Rezoning that certain property located -
- • in the Bayfront Area from I to P-C, R-3-H-P and C-V-P -
Second _reading and adoption
INITIATED nY: City Attorney. -
' . °AC!!GRGU\`D ' .
` The ordinance was placed on £irst reading at the
meeting �of Februazy 5, .1974 .
• ' . �
. ..?ttC:*'�D: , RcSO�IIL1Cii � j ��'_".�._:'8�2C^ �}{i � A;_.,•_*�1871� _ ',' . - ::.__ � 1
. .. . . �. . - � ' � cr.o �X.;1i,1 i: i � . . . -
-__lu-Lr121 S'�_eren;: . . � . � N.A.. . . ' . . � - � �. . .
_� _ �_Q*."7155�^S?-b0^cT3 h�CC:fI:'.E?^da_�on: ' ' .N:A.�• • � ' . �. . � : �
i^��oa=t:�ent fiFa,^: R�canr.�e,.catir_: Place oadinance on second reading
.and adoption.
: . . ' _ ::_y ;•f.�.a<<er R�ce::�e�da��^._; Concur . -
'��'' + _ .: � - .- _ • '. ' . ' _
_ , . .. . . ,
-��.-----=-_-. .t--....=--n--.. . _ -�-_-,,,. _
--�---�-,--��---.-.,, .:,,--r;,._.. _ __ - . _ .f _ .
_ „-:. _ ' _ ; .. -- -- ._ .--_ - , - ' . '" AGENDA ITEM� NO.�-[' '18'..,� , ,
' QIULA VISTA"CI1'Y COUNCIL D1EET?NG OF: February 5, 1974. ' '
ITE�1 TITL"c: Ordi_nance - Rezoning_ that Certain Property Located in the Bayfront
_ Area from I to P-C, R-3-H-P and.L-V-P. � .
. INITIATED 'nY: �City Attorney . •
SACKGRWND . ' . . � .
The City Attorney requests that the ordinance adopted on second reading on
January 22, 1974 relative to the Bayfront • rezoning be placed on first reading .
and reenacted as amended. �
The"P.}anning Cortmission during their hearings had recommended the inclusion of
certain Tidelands areas in the rezoning proposal for the .entire Bayfront area.
As Council 'is aware, the Tidelands, pursuant to the San Diego Unified Port District .
- Act, .can. be zoned by the several municipalities composing the San Diego Un_ified
Port District to' and until April 5, 1962• Prior to that date, the City of Chula
Vista adopted a T zone or Tidelands zone into which all of said property under the
jurisdiction of the City of Chula Vista was incorporated. The. City may not by law •
_ : amend"or alter that zoning as it existed pribr to Apri1 5, 1962. : }
� The Deputy City Attorney, who was at the Planning Comnission meeting, was not aware
of that provision. It does not appear, however, even if the City could .legally
. � . attach the precise plan. requirement to-the Tidelands•area. that any significant
_ change in the City' s zoning control span would be affected.
The Tidelands zone itself is not a typical zoning device. It simply authorizes
those uses which .are authorized by' the Tidelands _trust. It is recognized that
. nothing more, or less in the way of uses could `be authorized. The Tidelands zone
does provide that any development of such uses must be reviewed by the Pianning
Commission and the City 'Council of the City bf Chu.la Vis[a. ' This necessarily '
involve's submission' of precise plans or_the "equivalent thereof.
(continued)
A.TTHCkiED: , Rasolutioii f ; - C_3iraac� [X) Ag.eeneiit r 1 u;at I �
: .
_ . . ; •Sc� �xHI3ITS �Xj . +?c: .i
. P�.aar.cial Statenent: '. N/A . . - :
` Ce.�nisszor.-6oar3 Fecc�?ndation: N/A • -: ' ' � .
. . . ..� : _ . . . _ . . _
' lleoartnent Head Racor:�endatir,n: P1ace Ordinance on. First;Reading
- � . . . �. . . � . �
. , :,'- ' . .. . . - , . ,
- � - _ . . . . . . _ i�. _ . . . . • .
' _:� btana;er Recemaer.datien: ' Concur . ' : '
� .
, s - , ". . '. '
. _ . .: . • . - .
, >" _ , . _
- „ . : . - . . . -- � . . - - - _ , . . . .
� _ -•�•�_ � •. . .. � . . _ . -• _ � _ � •- ' . � -._ . . - . . • - _
" . `�. � . - . '" _• .. _ . ' . . . .�..' ... ' :.. ' . . ' . . . " . � _" .
' ' , t _ " - . � _ • ,-
Agenda Item No. 18 , . ,
Page Two
.
. � - � r � ,� .. " .
In the past 12 years, the City has only reviewed developmen[ plans on a _
limited number of occasions. This office recalls only a wash room and
some warehouses. In light of this history� to' give `insurance to the Port
Comnission that the City wishes to continue its excellent relationship
with the Cortmission and adhere closely to both the State law and our
own local ordinances, it is recommended that the ordinance be appropri-
ately amended.
An amendment of this nature does not require that the matter be referred
back to the Ptanning Cortmission for a report nor is it necessary to reopen
the public hearing. The attached ordinance is available to be acted upon
first reading at the present time.
���