HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1974/02/14 Item 18February 14, 1974
Agenda Item No. 18
Ordinance No. 1523
�..w��!�F'.'^a"++?,!Te<v,—_•.�ve.�r.C��aZe�-+e.-,�•.�,.F, --_�..._ " __<,a."x„� '_.. � �� .- "'-
-.1 '. . . "P:�P� _ _ r1': _ . _ . . - . .
;. :_ ... . _ . _ . _ _ -. " .
' ' - _ . . . - , "._ . - . ' • _ :;AGENDA'.ITE,t IdO: -I 18 � � :
CHJLA VISTA CITY COUNCIL AfEET?[vG OF: February 14 , . 1974 .
JT£RiTITLc: Ordinance No. 1523 - Amending Zoning Ordinance to change � -
- zoning and prezoning for approximately 110 acres between Otay
Lakes Road and Acacia. from R-E to R-E=P - Second reading and
adoptiori _
I\'IT:AT£D nY: Director of Planning
. 61C!!GRGU\D .
" The subdivision consists of approximately 32 acres
located between Otay Lakes Road and .ACacia Avenue
south of Bonita Road. �
� The ordinance was placed on first reading at the
_ meeting of February 5, 1974 .
t . .
..:."vC'r.°D: , AcSO�U�1011 � j v'-.'�.lII2i�C`: � j ' i.^�I'8•_LI012� . i =�"=�- � �
. . Sc� �?:c:L�I i� ` I r'�. _
. � _
- :::lu^ric^.1 SLate,ie,-�t: '. � � _ .. . � N.A. - . � � . . �
Ge-�:sszo�-6oar3 Recc:n.:,�ndation: - ' APProval " '
• Pena=r:,,ent HFa3 Reco�rer.carinn: Place ordinance on ;second reading
` . �—�� and�' adoption. " - �
- ' _ -:;; ;•ta,-.a�_:-r F.ec^:-:�er..2�:,r: � Eoncur �
. C�� .. . . - . _ • . . ' '. . . - ' ,
. . . . �
- r" - - ,�f='-�..�--'-.e v. .'-�-'-'-°'fe - ° - :--'e-'.,'.-^";.,,.^ - - ' --- _::.: = = . .:.. _
:�.` = .... _ _- . . , -- - - _ -_ - _ , - . � 'AGENDA�.ITF�tif N0: [ 2a,b.� .
CHULA VISTA CIT'Y COUNCIL :�tEETING OF: February 5, 1974 . �
. Public hearing (cont. ) - Consideration of change of" zoning and prezoning
for approximately 110 ac"res between Otay Lakes Rd, and Acacia from R-E
' ITEht TITLc: t0 R-E-P _
- --Qrdinance - Amending Zoning Ordinance to change zoning and prezoning of
approximately 110 acres betvieen Otay Lakes P,d, and Acacia from R-E•
to R-E-P
INITIATED 'nY: �D�irector of .Planning - -
SACKGRGUND " �
A. BACKGROUND
l . Request
' _-. The applicant, Par Construction Co. , is proposing to construct 136 single
fanily homes on 108± acres of property. Of the total , 76 acres are proposed
for annexation. The remaining 32 acres, already in the City, are presently
" zoned R=E. The'R=E-P zoning is being requested so the applicant may reduce
the lot sizes belo�•r the 20,000 sq. ft. minimum while still remaining �iithin
the overall _density permitted-.by the R-E zone.
,- An ad'ditional 2.4 acres± of Property, loceted south of Otay Lakes Road in
, the County, _ is also proposed for prezoning to R=E-P. This parcel is not .
oivned.by the applicant; however, the other. property owner is aware of the
proposal . _ .
2. Annexation. .
_ � LAFCO requires prezoning as a prerequisite for approval of an annexation:
The annexation of the 78.4± 'acres �•�as approved by the Planning Cormnission
on December 12, 1973 and includes the 2.4± acres soutli of Otay Lakes Road
not. in the applicant's ownership. LAFCO will consider the annexation on
. . February 4, 1974. � -
� � n�U+�: , � (continued on supplemental page)
, �..�; ��;<-
r.�"'.'vCF.°D: , Reso?utioii fXi �-..-s'a.ZC_ LX� Agre?neft� : : : [Xl
, ' - , - Sc� �X'_:Ii,I�S �X "o. 1t2
� ' . :�-aarc_al S`a_er:�eat� . '
_ Ces�isszo�-Boar3 Recc:a��enda�ion: The� Plannin9 Commission yoted 7-0 on December
- 12, 1973 recommending approval of the change ,of zoning and prezoning.of approximately
' 110. acres from R-E to R-E-P,
, .
�noa:i.�ent Y.eaa Recon.s!endatir,n; Concur
. . . . ,. . � '
- : , �: _ , . '
`<1, �•in:a�aer Reco,z,�e�.'.:�ier: Concur . •'
���: . : ��:: . . ' ." • - .. . . + _ • � - " - . - -
� J `1 - • .� _ . . . • - . -
. . .
City Council Pleeting AGEIJDA ITEP1 IdO. Za,b
February 5, 1974 . � Supplemental Page Nb. 2
3. Environmental Impact'Report
The Environr�ental Impact Report EIR-73-17 for Bonita Ridge Estates was
adopted by the Planning Commission on December 12, 1973.
6. ANACYSIS
1 . Surrounding zoning, land use, and jurisdiction:
North - A-4(1 ) - Vacant - County
Soutli - R-E, R-1-10-P Vacant - City (Proposed Ranchito Robinhood)
East - E-1 ; R-1 - Residential on Acacia and Palm Drive - County
!•lest - R-E - Residential - City
2. As previously noted, the .purpose of the R-E-P zoning is to utilize the
provision of the "P" Precise P.lan 1�1odifying District to enable the developer
to create lots less than the 20,000 sq, ft. minimum required by the R-E zone.
The tentative map, no�a being reviewed by staff, contemplates the creation
of 136 single family lots on the site. The smallest lot is 7600 sq. ft. ;
the average lot size is 10,600 sq, ft. The density of the development is
1 ,3 dwelling units/acre, toward the loei end of the General Plan range of
1-3 DU/acre and 4-12 DU/acre.
The primary reason that smaller lot sizes are being proposed is to group_
the lots on the more developable parts of the site, and leave the steeper
slopes undeveloped. Approximately 50% of the site will be ungraded and
undeveloped,
3. The Qonita Ridge Estates development is coordinated closely with the
proposed subdivision to the south--Ranchito Robinhood--which also has
utilized tfie "P" Modifying District to allow smaller lot sizes than would
normally 6e allowed, The Ranchito Robinhood tentative map �aas approved by
the City Council on I�ovember 27, 1973.
As in Ranchito Robin600d, staff finds the building sites proposed in Bonita
Ridge Estates to 6e adequate, and the addition of the "P" zone, �•ihile
providing flexibilitq to the developer, a�ill also provide the City a greater
degree of control over the development standards.
C. ' FIIlDINGS
1 . The applicant is attempting to minimize the grading, and has significantly
reduced the number of units on his property in an effort to conform with the
concept of the Hillside Modifying District even though the district regulations
do not apply to the property. �
2. The General Plan shows "low (1-3/acre) and inedium (4-12/acre) density
residential . " The proposed zone change aiill conform to the loai end of the
General Plan range.
��/
, ti
. .. .. . .. _ �-, �. . . . . . , . -
.
- :-�; . ,..- ..�;.. �: :-�;:, ;,,,: � �-- �
_ .-.;.,,,....{:`�' - _ - :''�'t_ ,- �'j�'�✓� �_.-.-- .
r:..:.. .
, .-. ,. - _
.• -;
= -
.:.. .-,::�. - - - - ;;e`� ' . _
.:�.�"- :�,� _ " . .
.,:-.::... , '_""""' .
�:
• . ���:� .;y
:
..'
.
,.:.., •
'.,i: � r:.,_��'' - ' ' '—"'_" __'_____
•��"�!�T'�` �
.�__�. : ,� . . .
� -n�i�_,�': ' .��-� ��,� � . ____—_
._L._, {�.�'�: '_.:.-y�y�i.-.ii� � /. . .
����'. / ���/' ..-�" . . ,. �
[j��\�� /�
�
• .
f . . � : . " � V / � ' .
; . i
� ��t
' � E._.........._��, �;
'; A=�( 1 ; � • _.'.
� -- j� � - 1 - ; --.
F; so. ; ��. f;�; � ' �i���� � i�� E �
�, v�cn��r ����/� a -��I P C Z - 7 3 - P _._ ..
`i�/�iii/�:�� - - - --- ---
r�� .`:.ie��v_ <-_�: j:%/i��? .%� ` � PF.OPOStD RE�C�ING
j, ! i � .l` \ �--! �" �� .�" .;� >`'' -- ---- - FROP.1 F-t TO R-E-P
'�' �,, `' ` � •�
� ' ...'. � � 1 ' (�. �i-�. � '/%' 1 • -�---..
� �` �
� i �--L�,_�;�_,_..: :;, / /�� �-��-- - �
; � �- , ,/ , ,, /;:
i-=—�. � J"I i / ,�'� �
� � � ' I L!�-�—!.//�/' � f •
�.�� / i � j��CPL.' � ,.,��j ��•.. 0 y`��p ';
� =I=; //i;;;;-� �E-1��.' . �./ �j� .E-l-A �?� 8 �
�� � ,/� �_/ co.�• /�yco_ ��o ;
` � �. ; / j- ...;� .;'`_ / - .
� / ` E'' j, / '`°
--r • �� ������/� '�.. / �j < ��'.., VACAtlT �
i ' � /�� /// `�: �/ /���• i
:� / �_ �
�� + / �i i .� F"e %�y:i�� � I
� �t� � i/ -, � //'/ ;.�/ C / . �
��•`._` . `� /. ��• :/ . //'`i.�'. I
; �_ =~ r C/ �/���� �/ ' �
.
• R-E P. �� �� � , � �ij' � , �/ .'. I .
�, � , /�;, �.������ � / ,
• VACI:III t �,��, .� //////�/��/ , __ � //.�_-�. / � ` •—
,���-- — - . _. � .:��...��-�' �-��Tt e .�..-e c:raiui� - ��. ��'
I � V/:h'�'
' , -�-C��:-F-E� � � '/�° � .-; i
- �waar„a _ _��_ �-`.-�n=+� � � ... :/ � : .
- .,::.�i-''oteeor'=r_- ' `:' . " :j//'. i /
� . ,- . � '�� �� �-. S
If ��i �'(-j'�t7'� ,//�// �� .
_ ��, �%;�:' �,// ��
I � _ ' \ � /i��j/� 1.:.-�
� � �P:
� . �
I�-1-fE) �:.._��yT �.
� s:
� I �o. . �%%1!%-�� ��
j� - 3 t:
. � :VACANT � - . =-...� �A^ YT i �� ��
- i � !;
( � t:
_ - ' - '�_ . �` % it
• ��. . i ,
_ � - � �- �.� �..� -'..
� ��- �
� ' ,..1.
�i
1
. . . ' .� �� �.
I L
i;
�.
� � 1��+.s+.u�1.._
I
�" �_1 1
� ( � ; ________`____ � ,
,
I � 60NIT0. VISTA !
. I ' ' ' ' """'_"_'"'; . � . �'�' '�.�_.
i � i �
. �
i � - t__..�__..-------- i \ ;
, _ - _ _ _ _ -� �
1� - � '
. �
, ---�—
� ; � _ . .. _ . _ : . ,-___�----��\
�
. . .. - . ��r
.. . " = . -- � . � � �
RESOLUTIOt� N0. PCZ-73-P
. RESOLUTiON OF THE CITY PLANNIRG COi�MISSION RECOtR•tE(dDIh7G TO ���HY�A�
THE CITY COUNCIL A CHAt�GE IN ZOWIPlG AMD PREZONIiaG FROht R-E �
TC R-E-P �GR APPROY.IP�'1TELY 110 ACRES LOCATED 6ET1•iE[M ACACIA �-��-�-�•�•
AVENUE Hi�D OTAY LAKES ROAD, APPROXI�JlTELY 3/4 t•tILE SOUTH OF
' BONIT(1 ROAD ,
k�HEREAS, a duly verified application for a change of zoning and prezoning
was filed :oith the Planning Department by Par Construction Company on August 20;
1973, Document PCZ-73-P, and
IJHEREAS, said application requested a change in zoning and prezoning
for approximaiely 11G acres located bet��ieen Fcacia Avenue and Otay Lakes Road,
approximate7y 3/4 mile south of Qonita Road, and
IdNEREAS, the Planning Commission sei the time anc: place for a hearing
on said application, and notice of said hearing, together v:ith its purpose, svas
given by the publication in a ne��:spap�r of general circul��ion in the City at
' least 10 days prior to the date o` said heari�g, and
tJIiEkEAS, a hearing 4;as held at said time anJ pla��, namely 7:00 p.m.
November 2i , 1973 and December 12, 1°73 in the Council Cha:nber, Civic Center,
before the Planning Commission, and said hearing �•ras therc.after closed.
trOlJ TYEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED !1S FOLL04lS:
l . From facts presented to the Comroissior., the Car�u�ission finds that
public necessity, convenience, general �velfare and good zcnin9 practice require
the change of zoning and prezoning from R-E to R-E-P for 2pproximately ii0 acres;
as sho�•m on attached exhibit, and based on the folloviing:
a. The approved Precise Plan includes specit=ic floor plans ane+
' elevations, and allo�as for a maximum of 13�6 �+�+elling units located
on the north side of Otay Lakes Road.
b. .The specific number of units is predicatud upon the approval
of final subdivision maps recorded for each ur�it,
2. The findings of fact in support of said deter:�ination are as foliot��s:
a. Attachment of the "P" h1odifying District rrill permit a develop-
ment plan which minimizes the grading and redaces the number of
units normally expected in the R-E zone.
b. The pr000sed zone change con`orms to the low end of the Ger.eral
Plan Range (1 - 3 units per acre).
/ � -
�
5�
3. The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council that said
change be granted.
4, That this resolution be transmitted, along wi�h the application,
' to the City Council , and a copy of this resolution shall Lx> transmitted to the
applicant.
PASSED and APPROVED by the CITY PLAN�It�G CQMPtISSION of CH�_k VISTN, CALIFORNIA,
this 12th day of Debember, 1973, by the follo�•�ing vote, tc-.ait:
AYES: t�tembers l•iilson, Rice, Chandler, h1acevicz, Rudo1F!�, S�•ranson and lJhitten
NOES: None
AQSENT: None .
�
� ---�-� z � .
Chairman
1
ATTEST:
����v ��u����-.
� Secretary
/ '
,
� S� ,2-