HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1973/06/05 Item 21 Item No. 21
Ordinance No. 1467
June 5, 1973 . � ' �GENDR ITE�f N0. [Z1_ ]
CHULA VISTA CITY COIJ\CIL MEETING OF: June 5, 1973
ITE�ITITLE: ORDINANCE NO. 1467 - Amending Chapter 2, Article 4 of the
Chula Vista City Code by adding th ereto a new section 2 . 405
establishing £ee requirements for annexations - Second
reading and adoption
INITIATED BY:
Planning Department
BACKGROUND
This ordinance covers the payment of proper expenses
of annexation proceedings as it pertains to property
owners seeking to annex territory to the City.
T;�e ordinance had its first reading on May 22, 1973,
and is now ready for the second reading and adoption.
ATTACHED: Resolution [ ] Ordinance [ ] Agreement [ ] Plat [ ]
See EXHIBITS [ ] No.
Financial Statement: N.A.
Commission-Board Recommendation: N.A.
Department Head Recommendation: Adoption of Ordinance
City bianager Recommendation: Concur with Department Head
\
���
� � "
� . � ' RGENDA� ITEDI \'0. [ 6 ]
CHULA VISTA CITY COIJ�CIL �IEETI\'G OF: Mdy 22, 1973
ITE�1 TITLE: Ordinance - rlmending Chapter2'�2;, 'Ait�icleX4:of'the'-Chula Vista
City Code by adding thereto a new section 2.405 establishing
+ fee requirements for annexations - First reading
i�iTIATE� BY: �- _erson, Director of Planning
BACKGROUND
On June 23, 1972, AB 1059 was added to the Government Code as Section 35016 relating
to annexations. The bill deletes sections of the Code requiring that annexation
costs be "paid by the city annexing or attempting to annex territory," and adds
Section 35016 which requires the city to pay annexation costs only if there is no
agreement between the annexing city and the proponents of the annexation concerning
payment of fees.
Presently, the only method of ensuring payment by the proponents of an annexation
is through the provisions contained in LAFCO's City Annexation Questionnaire.
Section V, page 3 of the questionnaire affords the city an opportunity to attach
terms and conditions to proposed annexations. LAFCO, in a letter dated April 4,
1973 suggests that cities utilize this section as a means of requiring proponents
to pay the State mandated fees associated with annexations.
The City Council can eliminate the possibility of the City being held liable for
payment of State mandated fees, while at the same time collecting fees to cover
processing, by adopting an ordinance requiring that the proponents of an annexation
submit a cash deposit, equal to the amount of all required fees, prior to the
processing of a request for annexation. '
ATTACHED: Resolution [ ] Ordinance [X] Agreement [ ] Plat [ ]
See EXHIBITS [X� No. 1,2
Financial Statement: N.A.
Commission-Board Recommendation: N.A.
oepartment xead Recommendation: Adoption of ordinance
City Alanager Recommendation: Concur with Department Head
�1
\
��