Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrd 1978-1824 . • . , /G � ORDINANCE NO. 1824 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING � THE ZONING MAP OR MAPS ESTABLISHED BY SECTION 19 . 18 . 010 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDING P-C ZONE OF EL RANCHO DEL REY BY ADOPTING A NEW SPECIFIC PLAN/ GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE P-C ZONE FOR THAT PORTION OF EL RANCHO DEL REY S4ITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND FOR THE P-C PREZONING FOR THAT PORTION IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AND CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT F4HEREAS , amendments to the P-C zone of E1 Rancho del Rey have been submitted to the City Council calling for the adoption of a� specific plan amending and replacing the existing general development plan and schedule for the P-C zone for that portion of E1 Rancho del Rey within the corporate limits of the City of Chula Vista and for the P-C prezoning for that portion of E1 Rancho del Rey located in the County of San Diego, as shown on Exhibit "A" . attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full , and WHEREAS , Environmental Impact Report 78-2 was prepared for the development of said property , and WHEREAS , changes in the proposed project and the cir- cumstances under which it is to be carried out has resulted in possible significant environmental effects not discussed in the previous Environmental Impact Report, and , WHEREAS , the project proponent submitted the necessary technical information for the Environmental Review Section of the Planning Department to prepare said document, and WHEREAS , the draft Environmental Impact Report was issued by the Environmental Review Committee of the City. of Chula Vista, giving notice in a newspaper of general circulation, and a Notice of Completion was filed with the Secretary of Resources� for the State of California, and WAEREAS , the Planning Commission of the City of. Chula Vista held a public hearing on said draft Environmental Impact Report and adopted a final Environmental Impact Report. N0�9, THEREFORE , the City Council of the City of Chula Vista finds as follows : That EIR-78-2 has been reviewed and the information ' considered, and that it has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 , as amended, the California Administrative Code and the Environmental Review Policy of the City of Chula Vista. SECTION I : That the Zoning Map or Maps established by Section 19 .18 . 010 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code be hereby amended by adding thereto the following zoning changes : That that certain property consisting of approximately 2, 339 acres , known as E1 Rancho del Rey, as shown on Exhibit "A" , attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full, be and the same is zoned and prezoned in accordance with . . . �- � the specific plan, as shown in said Exhibit "A" , and the specific plan text as shown in Exhibit "B" , attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full , pursuant to the pro- visions set forth in Sections 19 .12 .020 , et seq . , governing the ' rezoning of property and Section 19 .12 . 140 , governing the prezoning of property. SECTION II : That any and all ordinances and resolutions heretofore adopted by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista concerning zoning' of said property or any policies , including mora- toria upon development , dictating the development thereof, be and the same are hereby rescinded insofar as such provisions therein would conflict with or prevent implementation of the provisions of this ordinance, including all elements of the diagram and text of the specific plan incorporated herein. SECTION IIZ : That the City Council may waive all or a portion of any residential construction tax, or park land dedi- cation or in-lieu fee requirements that would normally be applied within this E1 Rancho del Rey P-C zone area, based upon a showing that open space required to be dedicated, as shown on the specific plan, subject to the agreement of the property owner, would be used to offset or compensate for such taxes , dedication or in-lieu fees . SECTION IV: This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirty-first day from and after its passage and approval. Presented and Approved as to form by /�\ .� / . George D. indberg, City Attorn -2- ��� FIRST READ AT A REGULAR h1EETING OF THE CITY COU�CIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, HELD AUGUST R , �91:�, AND FIPJALLY PASSED AND ADOPTED AT A REGULAR i•1EETIPJG THEREOF HELD All , IST 15 , 197�_, by the following vote, to—wit: AYES� Counciimen ; EGDAHL, GILLOW, SCOTT, COX NAYES� Councilmen ; MONE ABSTAIN: Councilmen : NONE ABSEVT: Councilmen : HYDE OR PRO TEMPORE ATTE City lerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss. CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, JENNIE M. FULASZ, CMC, CITY CLERK of the City of Chula Vista, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full, irue and correct copy of 18�'�� ,and ihat ihe same has not been amendedor repealed. DATED (seal) City Clerk �ua� CC-660 � August 8, 1978 9� C� P�,�:/�1P'��� / :.. TEXT Of THE SPECIfIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF EL RANCHO DEL REY , "Nothing Gained by Overcrowding" ����� /��� . - Raymond Umvin "Something Lost by Overspacing" - Lewi s htumford � � � � J�� .� - � :" ��=..�:M::�-'r'�'�-';'_._=-•. D � - .. - - =. _:� ;.'..-'�"- - . '_.-..':�?},'_4.f3-'%„'� EL RANCHO DEL REY SPECIFIC PLAN I. INTRODUCTION , The El Rancho del Rey Specific Plan, including the accompanying diegram, has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of the Chula Vista Municipal Code as contained in Chapter 19.06, relative to Specific Plans, and Chapter 19.48, concerning the P-C (Planned Community) zone, as such chapters will be amended by the City Council concurrent with the adoption of this Specific Plan. The Specific Plan constitutes an amendment of the existing General Development Plan of the Planned Community Zone previously adopted in 1970 for the E1 Rancho del Rey area. Said amendments were prepared by the Planning staff at the direc- tion of the City Council . Public hearings on the Plan have previously been conducted by the Planning Conmiission and although that body did not make a recorrrnendation on the Plan to the City Council , since the final vote relative to the Plan was a three-three division, all preliminary procedural steps have been fully complied with, so that the Council may now act upon the Specific Plan and adopt the Plan including the diagram and text as they may amend it during the course of their deliberations following the public hearing that has been held on said Specific Plan. The concept of the Specific Plan of the El Rancho del Rey area and its relation- ship to the P-C (Planned Community) zone is unique and must be clearly defined , in order to insure its proper utilization as a tool for the .implementation of the P-C zone. The substance of any P-C zone is the General. Development Plan and Schedule. Unlike other standard zones, the P-C zone does not contain, in the text of the comprehensive zoning ordinance, any specific standards of land use regulations. Al1 of the regulatory provisions of the P-C zone are contained . in the General Development Plan and Schedule adopted by resolution concurrent with the approval of the P-C zone for any parcel of land. An essential prerequi- site for the adoption of the P-C zone, including the General Development Plan and Schedule for any property, is the concurrence in said General Development Plan and Schedule by the property o��mer or owners. In the absence of such concurrence or agreement, it is neither legally possible nor practically feasible to imple- ment P-C zoning through the General Development Plan and Schedule. � As an alternative thereto, the Planning Department has prepared a Specific Plan, in accordance with Chapter 19.06 of the Chula Vista t1unicipal Code, which may be used in lieu of the General Development Plan and Schedule to provide the substance for the P-C zone. The Specific Plan of the E1 Rancho del Rey area is, . in fact, a large-scale, detailed version of that particular area as contained in the Chula Vista 6eneral Plan. It will become, upon its adoption by the City Council , a definitive statement of the policy of the City of Chula Vista as to the land use regulations and permitted development of the particular area , incorporated into the E1 Rancho del Rey P-C zone. Although it is not as detailed or precise as the General Development Plan and Schedule of a P-C zone, it should be accorded the same dignity as a General Development Plan and Schedule. The Specific Plan itself may be implemented either through a later adoption of standard zoning, conforming with the overall densities and land uses as desig- nated on the Specific Plan, �or through the adoption of the more detailed General Development Plan and Schedule, or precise plans, for all or a portion of the area incorporated into the P-C zone. Therefore, the Specific Plan is designed 6�,� . . ._ ,�- . —:_;r• ' . _ . _ ... . =;r. �.:;`"> � � . . . � � 2. to function as a policy bridge bet�•�een the General Plan and technical zoning regulations which �aill govern the undeveloped 2,339 acres of land within El Rancho del Rey, expressed either through standard zoning or, as indicated, ' . through the acceptance of a General Development Plan and Schedule by the property owner for all or a portion of the property. The Specific Plan elaborates upon the goals, general objectives and principles of the General Plan and is fully consistent with the General Plan. Any zoning or General Development Plan subsequently adopted must conform with, not only be consistent with, the Specific Plan. The E1 Rancho del Rey Specific Plan, according to city planning theory, is a "local district plan," and is charged with the direct application of the policy and strategy of this municipality's "structure plan" - the Chula Vista General Plan. This Specific Plan, as indicated, is far more detailed and definitive than the General Plan. However, it still remains a statement of the City Council of the policies for land use development and is therefore more succinct in text and more schematic in diagram than the General Development Plan and site utilization plans of the Planned Community Zones. The brief, schematic format is designed to provide sufficient flexibility in the E1 Rancho del Rey Plan so that it may remain a viable and effective plan over a prolonged period of time. Not only is the E1 Rancho del Rey Specific Plan readily amend- able, and thus capable of ineeting the demands of a changing society, it is also susceptible of administrative adjustment of the plan through the transfer of development rights which would retain the overall density and land use require- , ments but would allow a restructuring of the location and particular housing sites. In the event that the property owner should choose to apply for standard zoning, the permissible densities allotaed in the residential areas would be calculated by applying the densities designated on the Specific Plan to the gross acreage sought to be zoned, including those areas designated on the plan for open space or other public facilities. Plot�aithstanding such flexibility, the Specific Plan is sufficiently firm and definitive so as to promote the orderly , growth, development and conservation of requisite open spaces and drainage areas of the planned corrrmunity. The Plan incorporates an unusual feature - a table of translation - which enables the reader to rapidly determine applicable residential densities and land uses . for each general plan (land use) category. This information is transferred to the Specific Plan' s "plan diagram" through the medium of the Planning Depart- ment' s comprehensive color code. II . SUMMARY A. Goal , The promotion of the orderly and economic 9rowth, development, and conser- vation of the El Rancho del Rey territory, through comprehensive city planning, is the goal of the E1 Rancho del Rey Specific Plan. B. General Objectives 1 . The improvement of the existing and projected patterns of land use in El Rancho del Rey. �� ' �� 5' �N. . T , _. , 3. 2. The protection of the natural land forms and ecosystem of E1 Rancho del Rey and adjacent areas. ' 3. The establishment of an effective pattern of circulati[m within E1 Rancho del Rey, and an economic, useful , and convenient network of transportation linkages between the subject corrununity and other parts of the Chula Vista Planning Area. 4. The provision of adequate storm and sanitary sewers. 5. The conservation of water, fossil fuels, and natural vegetation. 6. The provision of affordable housing, where such is practicable. 7. The provision of adequate police, fire, park, recreation, and other municipal services . 8. The promotion of aiell ordered and aesthetic spatial relationshios, and the establishment of a qualitative townscape for the natural and manriade environments of the subject area and adjacent territories. 9. The provision of guidance for the preparation of precise development plans for the various portions of the E1 Rancho del Rey district. , 10. The provision of additional housing for the increasin9 population of the San Diego region. III. STATEMENTS OF POLICY; PRIPlCIPLES AND STANDARDS; FEATURES AND PROPOSALS A. General l . The El Rancho del Rey Specific Plan shall be regarded as the official land use policy of the City, and its text, graphics, and elements shall be reoarded as the comprehensive plan for the development and conservation of El Rancho del Rey. � 2. The El Rancho del Rey Specific Plan shall be the principal specific . and local district plan of El Rancho del Rey, and all zoning plans, public works plans, subdivision plans, transportation plans, development proposals, and capital improvement programs affecting E1 Rancho del Rey shall be governed by the said plan's provisions. 3. The land use pattern, circulatory system, and spatial relationships of El Rancho del Rey should be consistent with the suburban order of the Telegraph , Canyon and Bonita Sunnyside communities. 4. It shall be the policy of the City of Chula Vista to require develop- ment in the E1 Rancho del Rey P-C zone to proceed in a manner which protects the topographic character of tfie area. Therefore, the predominant ridges and canyons should be determining factors in determining the form and character of develop- ment. Z� . . . . - .. - - . -+: .�; _,�: .- . " �. 4. 5. The development of E1 Rancho del Rey should be consistent with public safety, including seismic safety. Therefore, the traces of the La Nacion Fault and its splinter faults should atso determine the pattern of , development within the subject territory. : 6. The City of Chula Vista's adoption of overall plans for the provision of water and sewer service to E1 Rancho del Rey by draina9e basin should be prerequisite to the further substantial growth and development of the subject community. This plan should be prepared by developers with the cooperation of the City. 7. The Chula Vista City Planning Commission shall submit annual reports to the City Council , in January of each year commencing in 1980, on the status of the E1 Rancho del Rey Specific Plan and the progress of its execution. 8. The City should prepare a reimbursement plan or plans to equitably distribute the costs of improving East "H" Street and other street segments and public facilities essential to the E1 Rancho del Rey area . Al1 develop- ments in the area should be subject to the fees and conditions as established by the City Council through adoption of such plan or plans. B. Design and Townscape Planning 1 . The text and plan diagram of the E1 Rancho del Rey Specific Plan , propose the development of a well balanced district which would be character- ized by a diversity in land use and a strong emphasis upon natural and man arranged open space. The Specific Plan prescribes a suburban character for El Rancho del Rey and allocates large tracts of land to "estate" and lo�•� and medium density residential developments. The plan recognizes tfiat the single family dwelling will be the dominant land use of the subject area, but permits and encourages cluster, patio-home, and townhouse developments; garden apart- ment projects; and other "new concept" residential developments which could provide interesting land use patterns and spatial relationships and thwart suburban boredom. This boredom, which is too prevalent in California, is usually attributable to a lack of variety in land use and a lack of verve and luster in urban design. 2. In general , the bulk, height, parking, open space and other pre- announced standards of the City of Chula Vista' s zoning regulations should govern, �ahere appropriate from a land use standpoint, developments within E1 Rancho del Rey. However, these preannounced standards should be regarded as minimum reGuirements, and the Planning Cortmission or the City Council may require higher standards during the course of either's review and consideration of specific developmental proposals. , 3. Greenbelts should be established and maintained along Telegraph Canyon and Otay Lakes Roads and the north leg of Rice Canyon, in accordance �•iith the Open Space General Plan Element. (See accompanying plan diagram. ) 4. Signs should not be permitted within the E1 Rancho del Rey planned community unless they conform to a comprehensive si9n plan which has been pre- viously reviewed by the Planning Commission and adopted by the City Council . �� _,-_ .. °_�__ -.< .TY� � . . . � • 5. 5. At least t�ao sites which provide panoramic or interesting directional vistas should be available as public vie�•lpoints, and pedestrian and/or vehicular access should be provided thereto. At least one such site should be considered , for acquisition by the City. � 6. Residential areas covered by the Specific Plan should be subdivided, where feasible, into a number of structural planning units referred to in the Sedway/Cooke report as micro-neighborhoods which should consist of 50 to 100 dwelling units. Preservation of the dominant east-west canyons will preclude use of the traditional neigh6orhood planning unit and will require instead the development of linear subcommunities aihich will be defined by the canyon areas. Each subcommunity ti•�ill be composed of a number of micro-neighborhoods, which in turn will be defined primarily by similarity of housing type. Each micro- neighborhood should have a small co�rmion recreational area, a common access road, and common landscape theme. C. Conservation � 1 . The El Rancho del Rey Specific Plan places a strong emphasis upon conservation. It advocates the preservation or scientific relocation of rare and endangered biological colonies, and their protection from, the destructive activities associated �aith human settlements, �•+here such is feasible. In short, the plan proposes a balance bet�aeen the natural and manmade environments. ' 2. The natural open space and land forms of E1 Rancho del Rey should determine the subjec.t territory's structure and basic design. Although the north leg of Rice Canyon should be preserved almost in its entirety, the preser- vation of the middle and south leg could be confined to their natural floors.l As the land is subdivided, hoo-�ever, the preserved floors of the middle and south legs of Rice Canyon should be complemented by adjacent corrrtnon greens, promenades or landscaped pedestrian �aays. 3. The City of Chula Vista regards the north leg of Rice Canyon as vital public open space, and recognizes the need for public participation in the main- tenance, development, and conservation of the subject territory. The city does not regard the maintenance, development, or conservation of other open space . within E1 Rancho del Rey as being, at the present time, within the public charge. The latter should take the form of private open space reserves, common greens, open space easements, or open space maintenance districts. 4. lJhile the grading of territory within El Rancho del Rey should be carefully controlled, and should be sensitive to the natural environment of the community in_ question, it must be recogni.zed that the rugged terrain confronting developers cannot accommodate urbanization on an economic basis in the absence of considerable grading.2 Such grading should be contoured at the edges of a project , so as to maintain a natural appearance even though substantial earthwork is per- formed. Within a project, grading should not be solely designed to alter the 1 - The specific action policy of Goal No. 5 d of the text of the Chula Vista General Plan reads: "Identi:y ar.d preserve strategic areas, such as look- out areas, lake shores, deep and iateresting canyons." 2 - The specific action policy o: Goal ?Qo. 5 b, at page 22 of the Chula Visia General Plan, calls �or the estabiishment o£. "controls to p:event ugly scarring and grading in developaeat of eastern lands." � 7. E. Public Facilities Planning ' 1 . The Specific Plan, with the exception of a conceptual network of , arterial and collector streets, does not depict the various water, sewer, and similar public facilities required to serve and support the E1 Rancho del Rey area. It will be necessary that comprehensive plans for the various facilities be developed prior to substantial growth and development of the subject commun- ity. 2. In general , public facilities should be designed to accomnodate the ultimate loads projected to be encountered by the subject facility. Public facility designs should promote conservation of natural open space, promote conservation of energy, minimize grading through open space, and foster creation (where necessary) of slopes of the area. 3. The upper limits of density ranges approved for development of El Rancho del Rey should be used in the design of public facilities to serve the , area. Where specific subareas have been developed (or assured) having densities other than such upper limits, the actual density may be used. 4. The plan diagram shows the location of areas to be devoted to schools and parks. For the most part such areas are not now owned by the City or a school district, so their depiction on the plan represents only policy. Should a developrr�nt plan be filed on an area shown on the plan as "park" or , "school " and a public agency decides not to purchase or reserve the land as allowed by State Law and local ordinance, the land use and residential density to be permitted will 6e determined by tF�e Planning Commission and City Council in consideration of such factors as topography, surrounding land use or land use designations, accessibility and traffic projections. f. Residential Planning 1 . The residential density of E1 Rancho del Rey should be limited by the topography and natural constraints of the subject territor.y, as well as the General Plan parameters of the Telegraph Canyon community and those adopted for adjacent territories. Notwithstanding these factors, the unit yield and densification of E1 Rancho del Rey must be sufficiently high to economically justify the development of the required streets, the construction of the r.equisite water and sewer lines, the preparation of the land for development, and the investment of development capital by the free market. 2. While the Specific Plan designates large areas as permanent, natural open space, the Specific Plan recognizes this by establishing densities in nearby areas to compensate for this open space, noting that the rugged terrain itself would dictate considerable open, undeveloped area* During the preparation of the , Plan , densities were transferred from the open space areas to nearby lands in order to show the desired land use and open space patterns. The ranges expres.sed * Most of the land covered by the Specific Plan is situated vithin the unincor- porated territory of San Diego County. According to the S�+eetwater Community Plan adopted by the County, the subject lands should be developed at a maximum gross density of 1.0 dwelling units per acre. The Specific Plan, on the other hand, sanctions an overall gross density of 2.6 dwelling units per acre. ��`� _� � f�� . . •= .y_- . _�::�:.�..:.. =_.r, � . ' o. topography to fit predetermined lot sizes and floor plans, but should contem- plate the use of some d��ielling types which can be better fitted to the land and pad types which minimize exposure of manmade slopes. 47hile it is not the intent , of the City of Chula Vista to literally apply the provisions of the Hillside t•todifying District to El Rancho del Rey, the purpose and objectives of that regulation do apply and the staff report on each development in El Rancho del Rey should contain a statement as to the extent of compliance or noncompliance with the provisions of the Hillside htodifying District. The City's hillside development policy as contained in the "Design Criteria for Hillside Development," adopted by the City Council on February 11 , 1975 should apply in the E1 Rancho del Rey area. D. Circulation and Public Facilities 1 . The street system of E1 Rancho del Rey shall meet the traffic and land service needs generated by the development of the area ' s several thousand acres and shall by design promote conservation of natural open space, the establishment of a suburban order, the reduction of the need for grading, and the encouragement of economy in land development. 2. The construction of the East H Street artery to the requirements of the City, and the development of major, requisite public facilities, or the City's adoption of a developer-initiated program therefor, shall be prerequisite to further substantial growth and development in the northerly portions of ' E1 Rancho del Rey, and it shall be the City's policy that development which is tributary to H Street shall progress from west to east. 3. In particular, no lands within the La Canada, Del Centro, Del Rey, or North College Sectional Planning Areas, or within that part of the Parkside SPA which abuts upon East H Street, shall be developed prior to the involved developers ' submittal of a program for the full construction of East H Street, between the easterly limits of the Rice Canyon SPA and Otay Lakes Road, and the City Council ' s approval of such program. 4. East-west equestrian and hiking trails within the three legs of Rice Canyon already exist and some should be preserved as development of adjacent lands occurs. It is the policy of the City to also make provision for at least one north-south trail which should utilize such existin9 �rights of way as the San � Diego Otay 4later line and the SDG&E easement. Additional north-south routes or variations and adaptations of the basic north-south route may become apparent at such time as development proposals are made and grading plans are developed. 5. Bicycle routes and facilities should also be established within the principal canyons of the district, ti�ihere such establishment tvould be consistent with natural conservancy, as well as along the main streets of El Rancho del Rey , in accordance �•�ith the Bike Routes General Plan Element and adopted implementing plans. 6. The El Rancho del Rey corrnnunity should be served by the City of Chula Vista 's mass transit system. This service should be planned and implemented by the Director of Public 4lorks and the Transit Coordinator. �� :Rr .. _�� • �i _ � . . � � 8. on the Specific Plan, at the upper end of the range, are a maximum allowable density upon which the subdivider can fully rely, and reductions from that maximum should be made only upon a showing that, given a particular develop- ment area and circumstances and conditions encountered therein, a lesser density would be desirable; but in no case would it be less than the low end of the range , established for the area. The following factors should be considered in arriving at a less than maximum density for a particular project: a. The location of the property with regard to existing or prospective developments. b. The impact of the project on traffic circulation and schools. c. The topographic character of the property and other development constraints, including earthquake faults and the presence of endangered species. d. The degree to which amenities, unique features, and open space are incorporated into the project. 3. Within a given Sectional Planning Area, the Planning Comnission and City Council may authorize development of a project at a density higher than the � maximum overall density. Prior to such authorization, however, the applicant should demonstrate by the preparation of preliminary plans for subsequent phases that the overall maximum density will not be exceeded. At the time of approval of a higher density project, the preliminary plan shall be adopted as a refine- , ment of the El Rancho del Rey Specific Plan. (See also the discussion of Sec- tional Planning Areas on page 10. ) 4. In order to prevent the excessive restructuring of land, especially � on the periphery of canyons and along steep streets, unconventional housing types, such as split-pad and pole houses, should be encouraged. 5. Medium high density residential development within El Rancho del Rey should be based upon the "garden apartment" concept, and should be characterized by extensive internal and peripheral open space. 6. The land developers of E1 Rancho del Rey should, where feasible, utilize the cluster, townhouse, patio home and zero lot line concepts in an effort to provide usable open space. These concepts, if adroitly planned, could also promote energy and water conservation, and lessen the requirement for streets. They also could provide an opportunity for the development of much needed afford- able housing. The employment of the cluster-garden concept for the housing of moderate income families and individuals could, in part, take the form of a mobile home park. Well planned mobile home parks would be especially appropriate in those , areas of El Rancho del Rey which are slated for "medium high" or "medium" density residential development. 7. The urban design and townscape planning of all multiple family developments within the E1 Rancho del Rey Planned Comnunity shall be governed � by the Design Manual of the City of Chula Vista. For the purposes of this state- ment of policy, condominium apartments, comnunity apartments, garden apartments, and all other projects under which three or more dwelling units are constructed on a single parcel of land, shall constitute multiple family developments. �� . � 9. 8. It is the express policy of the City of Chula Vista to require, in the El Rancho del Rey area, fine grained mixtures of housing types. As a general rule any development proposal involving more than 50 acres, or 250 d�velling units, , should include at least two housing types. In large proposals, in appropriate areas, three or more housin� types may be required. The City shou�d not approve attempts to evade this requirement via a series of 49 acre or 249 dwelling unit subdivisions. The following should be considered as different housing types for the purposes of this policy. a. Single family homes on "typical " lots b. Apartments c. Duplexes d. To��rnhouses e. Postage-stamp single family condominiums f. Single family detached homes on lots containing 4,000 square feet or less g. Patio homes h. Zero lot line homes G. Cortunercial Planning l . The Specific Plan designates several local , cortenunity, and regional shopping centers. The plan has purposefully utilized natural and planned open space in a manner �ahich should reduce commercial -residential friction and, , through the employment of green interstices or buffers, has limited the impact of cortmercial activity and traffic upon residential enjoyment. 2. The Specific Plan includes the proposal that E1 Rancho del Rey's principal shopping precinct be located on the east side of I-805 and on the south side of the East H Street artery (proposed) . The said precinct, �ahich would occupy approximately 32 net acres, could accorrunodate a regional shopping center with not more than 300,000 square feet of gross leasable area . However, because this center could promote the decline of the existing Chula Vista shopping center, full exploration of the possibility of fulfilling the city's need for additional regional shopping facilities through the expansion of the Chula Vista/ Sears shopping complex should be undertaken before final approval is 9iven to . this center at I-805 and H Street. If the said expansion reaches fruition, the 32± acres on East H Street could be devoted to a town and country (community ��� level ) shopping center, visitor corrunercial uses, recreational commercial uses, p.�' � or a combination thereof. A part of this territory could also be devoted to a planned automotive sales and service park. These principles are partially based upon the Sedway/Cooke suggestions for the development of the Rice Canyon area. 3. 4Jhether the subject precinct is ultimately developed as a regional comnunity, or other type of commercial center, onsite ancillary residential develop- , ment should be encouraged and authorized at a maximum density of 18 dorelling units per gross acre. The preplanned mixture of multiple family dwellings and mercan- tile uses at East H Street and I-805 could create a well ordered and pleasant living-working environment. 4. Although not shown on the plan diagram of the E1 Rancho del Rey Specific Plan, several mini-centers of abouC�l� acres may be allowed in appro- priate locations for the convenience of local residents. Such centers may include a small , quick service grocery store, barber and beauty shops, and similar services. Careful preplanning of such centers shall be required to ��� y~ . . . � � .� io. insure their compatibility with adjacent residential areas. Freestanding signs for such centers shall be limited to 4 feet in height. 4Ja11 signs shall be limited to one square foot for each linear foot of building frontage. 1 H. Sectional Planning Areas � l . The subcommunities or Sectional Planning Areas (SPA) indicated on the plan diagram have been formulated for the purpose of guiding the imple- mentation of Section 19.48.050 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code and thereby providing E1 Rancho del Rey with a high level of internal� unity and order. 2. The number of dwelling units allowed within a given SPA is fixed. However, in order to promote density flexibility and residential diversity, the Planning Comnission and City Council may authorize the transfer of density from one density designation to another area within the SPA ��ihich carries the same density designation. The Planning Cormnission and City Council may also authorize the transfer of density within a SPA from one density designation to an area �•ihich carries a different designation in cases o-rhere the apolicant provides ample evidence that the proposed transfer would substantially improve the spatial or functional relationships of the involved SPA or would materially increase the quality of the land use, circulation or conservation pattern thereof. In either type of density transfer an increase in density in one area must always be accompanied by a corresponding decrease in density in another area within the same SPA. Careful , preplanned attention must be given to areas where density is , transferred to insure their compatibility with loa�er density developments on their periphery. Any request for a transfer of density shall be accompanied by a development plan for the entire SPA showing the proposed development pattern in the areas in which the density is being adjusted. Such development plan shall be adopted as a refinement of the E1 Rancho del Rey Specific Plan at the time of approving a higher density project. 3. The density flexibility discussed in the above paragraph should encourage a diversity in housing types. The micro-neighborhoods which are devel- oped at a density which is substantially higher than their authorized overall density will probably accommodate condominium, townhouse, patio home, comnon green, or garden apartment projects. Furthermore, this diversity could alter the magnitude of required grading and reduce developmental costs . 4. Although the boundaries of the SPA's are indicated on the plan diagram, and the maximum densities of the SPA plan are shown for each density classifica- tion in the said diagram's legend, it should not be construed that the SPA plan is automatically operational . Before any portion of an SPA will be approved for development at a density �vhich is higher than the top of the involved range, a preliminary plan for the entire involved SPA should be reviewed by the City Planning Commission, and approved by the City Council . Upon approval of the , Council , the preliminary plan should be adopted as a refinement to the El Rancho del Rey Cormiunity Plan. 5. The Sectional Planning Areas could be used for any purpose which requires the subdivision of the vast territory of E1 Rancho del Rey into well - ordered and structured subcommunities. For example, the SPA plan could be util - ized as the basis for the systematic creation of open space maintenance districts. �� : . / � ,%�i.l` . . > > . �f�i� I. Table of Translation The following Table of Translation embodies a tabular analysis of the land use, residential density, and population proposed for E1 Rancho del Rey by the , text and diagram of the Specific Plan. The table clearly reflects.�he plan's dual emphases upon conservation and development. _. _._ .._ . .. Table of Translation No. of HOUSING Dwelling Units Dwelling CATEGORIES per Gross Acre Dwelling Types Acres Units Very Low 1 - 2 Residential Estates - 265 530 Single family detached Cluster housing Low 2 - 3 Single family detached 272 816 Single family attached Cluster housing Medium/Low 3 - 5 Single family detached 478 2,390 Single family attached Cluster housing Townhouses � Medium 6 - 10 Single family detached 187 1 ,870 � Single family attached Cluster housing Townhouses Garden apartments Medium/High 11 - 18 Townhouses 22 396 _ Garden apartments _ Low 'rise apartments _ , Sub Tota_1 " 1 ,224 6,002 -. COMMERCIAL Retail 53 Recreation �p FIRE STATION � SCHOOLS Elementary 50 Junior High 60 � Senior High 50 PARKS Neighborhood 25 Community �g NATURAL OPEN SPACE 7gp TOTAL 2,272 6,002 . " -'id.., . ..`.Y,'�����::��'-,s-'.y' - ( " � � . "'�i:�-x•,{;,�_�:K; � xi:'zs�..�,�. a'i' . . _ _�..._._ . ,.�.:"- ' .`:- �.q,��s -r. a� � f4` ���'fylt� .��i�"��i/� �� Y ' Y_ _ - .Z��.T'�- .�L.r�.h.� " 12. J. Cost Distribution � The cost of certain public facilities required to serve the El Rancho del Rey area should be distributed by means of a reimbursement plan or plans. The plan should equitably spread costs among all who benefit by the construction, including, as appropriate, the general public of the city. All developments in the area should be subject to the fees and conditions as established by the City Council through its adoption of a reimbursement plan or plans. IV. PLIUY It•iPLEP1ENTATION The El �ancho del Rey Specific Plan, upon adoption, will constitute municipal policy. The effectuation of this policy will require much subsequent precise plannine. ?n particular, the zoning plan of El Rancho del Rey must be brought into a state of consonancy with the Specific Plan through the comprehensive amendment oi the E1 Rancho del Rey Planned Community Zone' s General DeveloPment Plan and Schedule, or through the rezoning of the 2,271 acres in Guestion to traditional zoning classifications . l•Jhichever zoning route is selected, the adoption of the Specific Plan should substantially facilitate and expedite processing. l•lith respect to plan processing, every effort should be made to reduce the time 1 required ior the review and approval of precise and project plans. Zoning and subdivision proposals, for example, should be considered as comoanion proposals at the same meeting, a�here such are associted with the same land development project. � V. COi;CLUSIO�d The foregoing text and the accompanying plan diagram constitute a policy bridge between theChula Vista General Plan and the forthcoming project plans for the development of El Rancho del Rey. The said text and diagram are readily amend- i able, and therefore should be able to guide the growth and development of the . subject area over a protracted period of time. Since the 2,339 acres of El Rancho del Rey will require several years of development, and changes taithin the free market and public preferences must be anticipated during the cburse thereof, the policies and principles of the plan have been couched in flexible terms. This flexibility, however, has not diminished the Specific Plan ' s fidelity to the Chula Vista General Plan and its constituent elements. 1 � ���