The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2014-04-15 Additional Information Item 7 � �� ' � �'� �� . � � � � * � , �,� .,! •, �� ,, - � ' � o . , �� .� f r�► �ir� . ,.1 �'er�� .,,,�'��.� � �� .. �rr��,. <s � , , � �. •� _ ,� � L � ,� , � , ' ; � . � . ' � , � ,� � � ,, o �. / �� I�, . . : //,� `_ �� . , '�- : F� '•�'\� �p '�� :::;_ �� .0 1 �p�\�� ' � � . , �.i„' ��I,,� ..J ��r 0 ' :. `� � •.��.{ �' z'�� Q�ti. � /-�e�x F�� !' �r �~ - ' ��(M ' . .Q O �� `' Y.'F- �lF '-'�'Q . . `� Z'/N ..� � O_�_ ��i, �a ,�.. � . r �.�_ � _ a �` fa 3 J �ar x .r -' � R � � o / 0� �y � . s r i�? �\�' ��`r' �,. Q . _� . ri�,0°`� �,k�'` ��.t� . h "a� i 0� ''Y�'-• ��'j(�� "`, `.:� �.-� �,r�1�� C�u,.-�% r _�,�r „�", ,� �o�:..:.;-. . �� -...-.�o� �� , v �,� � :,::, - 'Y.y..� Q, �x, "�w .�. �,� . . a� ��` .t ^�b� _ia �..F�+ -� s /I, ��\ �. �'^O�� lw� �'tstx -�.-� _� ��"��Q ' �i / \. �i�-��`�:Cl �r.,.�4 �*'�'`�. '' ��`-,tc�i�.Jf�c' _ ;f3"T'= ��.. G�-�f '� ��=,... ��E �r-..7,� \_ , .��r�1 � p"lA`-j�y �',' � �� ' ;<��.,`,�� r �.�, �� - .`�' _ `�`�`�i� . . 0 _ - 4 � � � 4 � � ..� . . .. ., . . _'_." . . ._,:� � .. . � � - � � 0�� - . �� / . I �� ° y' �� w. t ' :♦ .� 3. A�\ \ O�-• � � �• � �..,..I ` ``� �- .. � � �� o - '�� , ,�.� o: �. !� - �� o� - �I��;��,�'m.. � o: ::.,. ��. , .o��:�:4�� . � , �.,�� `� � , N `p:� ��;:�� v �• � Q .. 1 QA �� •• f p. w �;�..e•.:,,�� .. � �- -� ... . � m... , ... -� ...�...� .. ...:, o = �m...:.:.iy .,s , .:;.� A a�� ;;:;�..:. ` m-._ `titi,��, '{ ��l��l� �� i O'+��\��1° �+,��.,�.,t_ \�\\VA.,`�\J��;`��~�,, � � � \�� • �w w �.� a �w� �� . � � , ac. ��` '�',¢�.1•/ �� Q.. �� Y�` � — � Q�� -� c � i.A �-y�y' �i E tz` z . � \� � � . S✓ t� ti S ..�yy _��]. .➢ . :�_Q :: - . �. 5��j. . Qs �,32>r �. m . y i� �, "C� � 0' _. " �L -^-� , '.Fd �� .i �� 1' �, �-,. � - +fi �i^v:� \� % /\ � • ��i� � •��i. � i-y�., l� ...' 0 .+ ._� �y^ �i ��y �/ � � ` .- .i� �r Y� �..¢-.��' � � 'O' ' i i � . _. i s�' i c . .�i�i�vL� .9. 1 ��:�f% i� , �y�Q��er ��,P p .. i . �'" �f�� - yi.�.i" �� `� ��iS1��.�=�9 .�iC ' ' � \[�� i,�'�� ., . �\ �� , _ � � � R.. '�. � -�-.. ; �__ �� .,� , �� v n � •• p / _ I y ' _ - . 0.� _ I ' 1 I' � " :A i ' .� � �i�..��f.�� :..�� I ll : 1 11 1 .L ir'�' ' "_ �� 7 FISCHBECK cC OBERNDORFER P PROFESSIONAL COiiPOFATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW 5464 GROSSMONT CENTER DRIVE THIRD FLOOR WILLIAM L FISCHBECK LA ME54. C4uFORHia 9i9a2 weaS�TH: wwwlaMCUlew.com E-HAtL: vll�alamcvlammm TEIEPMONE (619� 464-1200 FAX: 16191 464-64➢1 April 14, 2014 Sent b�� Emni/nnd U.S. First Class zllni/ Donna Norris. Cit�� Clerk Ci[v of Chula Vista 276 Fourth A��enue Chula Vista. CA 91910 Glen R. Googins. Esq. Citt Attome�� Citv of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista. CA 91910 Re: City Council Aeenda. April 1�, 201=t Item: Sharp Hospital Precise Plan Kesettine of Hearina Dear �4s. \'orris and \4r. Gooeins: This office has been retained bv the Bella Sol HOA in reeard to certain aspects of the proposed construction of a parkine structure; lighted to��er and loop road before the Council on Tuesday. Of critical importance is the staff recommendation to Council that the project is exempt from the requirements of CEQA. Our re��ie�� has concluded that csanet likely be suppo*ied. Ho�ve��er, �ve cannot full�� analyze this because the reports upon �vhich staff is relyin� have not been made public despite the fact that the hearin� is scheduled for tomorro�v. Specificall}�, late in the da�� last Thursday, staff released re��ised documents that purported to address the CEQA e�emption position of staff. Reference is made in those documents to t�co "technical letters" upon �ahich staff relies hea��il}�, which reports apparently ��ere finished and dated only tha[ same day, April 10. Ho��ever. to our kno��ledge, the reports �vere not attached or othen��ise made available to the public. The Clerk`s office confirmed to m�� client that it did not ha��e those documents either. r1nd, to make matters �rorse. the Cit�� offices weie, of course. dosed last Frida��. FISCHBECI{ Sc OBERh'DORFER ♦ VqO�E5510H�1 COPVORITION Donna Norris. Cit�� Clerk Glen R. Gooeins, Esq.; City Attome�� Citv of Chula Vista April 14, 2014 Paee 2 This matter should not be heard either as to the CEQA decision or the substance of the applications until all the information relied upon by the Applicant and staff have been made a��ailable to the public und ndeq:rnte �ime hns been pror•ided for the public to reviei+� the irafonnnrio�t nnd obtniir utclepeiide�rt co�rs�dtatro�7s reearding those reports. Of course. the minimum time under California la��and ��our o��m ordinances is ten da��s and :ce �,cu;� s;:�°CJI IIIO:e lll:le 3$ in o.d�r �:��en th: tec:u:ical r.ature of the referer.ced letter reports. Therefore, we respectfully offer our opinion that this matter should be removed from the current aeenda to be reset at a later time that complies ��ith the la�� and provides a reasonable time for the public, and Belia Sol HOA specifically, to address these ne�v reports. It ��ill be a sen�ice to the public if this matter is handled todati� to save unnecessary time and e�pense to the panies im�olred. Respectfully submitted, � Nilliam . ischbeck \1'LF:«�v cc: Bella Sol HOA Bella Sol HO.VCitv Clerk BAtt��4-Id-ll �vri�c.n c3ovnmunica�to►�.S Herh�k.� Kerry Bigelow From: Elizabeth Briggs on behalf of CityClerk Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 4:34 PM To: Kerry Bigelow;Jeff Steichen Subject: FW:City Councit Agenda,April 15, 2014 - Sharp Hospital Precise Plan Attachments: Letter to Chula Vista Mayor and City Council 4-14-14.pdf From: Debbie Whetstine [ Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 2:39 PM To: CityClerk Cc: William Fischbeck; CityAttorney; Kelly Broughton Subject: City Council Agenda, April 15, 2014 - Sharp Hospital Precise Plan Dear Ms. Norris: Please find attached correspondence of this date from Attorney William Fischbeck to Mayor Cox and the City Council Members. We will be delivering the original and seven copies of this letter to the City Clerk's o�ce today before 4:00 for distribution to those parties. Thank you. Deborah Whetstine Assistant to William L. Fischbeck, Esq. Fischbeck & Oberndorfer, APC 5464 Grossmont Center Drive, Suite 300 La Mesa, CA 91942 Phone: (619) 464-1200 Fax: (619) 464�'i471 Email: debbie(o�lamesalaw.com i 1/vri�}cv� Comw�.�l,rt i ca�,b►1 S I-4zwi � FISCHBECK & OBER�DORFER A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW 5464 GROSSMONT CENTER ORIVE THIRD F(.00R WILLIAM L. FISCHBECK LA MESA, CAIIFORNIA 91942 WEBS[TC: wcvlaMaalaw.mm E-aAIL: ci[�lame511awrom TELEPHONE (6191 <64-1200 F.ix: (61BI 464-Ba]1 April 14, 201=} Sent b�� E�uni!nnd Hnnd Delivered The Honorable Chen�l Cos. A4avor � ��fembers of the Cit�� Council - City of Chula Vista � _A Office of the Cit� Clerk � � � 276 Fourth A��enue m - �� '�` n Chula Vista, CA 91910 � � m N A �� .. a .y_ m Re: City Council Agenda, April 1�_ 2014 �i< �„i� p Item: Sharp Hospital Precise Plan ��--,� iJ CEQ.A Compliance Required r"' OD Dear \4a��or Cos and Coimcil �4embers: This office is representing the Bella Sol Homeo��ners Association, the residents oC which li��e immediatel�� to the northeast of the proposed parking strucmre and to��er and adjacent to a ponion of the proposed loop road. CEQA requirements ha��e not been met for this project and the Council should not proceed until the}� are met. The short ��ersion of the problems ��ith the staff conclusion that the project is e�empt from CEQA is as follo��s: Code of'Regulations Sections 15300.2: Exceptions to Categorical Esemptions. Staff has based this conclusion on the provisions of section 1�332 of the State CEQA Guidelines (Cal Code of Re�ulations; sections 1�000. et. seq.), referred to as `�the infill exemption." Ho��e��er, the official comments to that section pro��ide: "Application of this Section, as all categorical ezemptions, is limited by the factors described in section 1>300.2." At least h�o of the limitations in section 1�300.2 are applicable in this matter and aze deemed to be exceptions to the "infill ezemption": "(b) Cumula[ive Impact: All esemptions for these classes are inapplicable �vhen the cumulati��e impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, o��er [ime. is sianificant." FISCHBECH Bc OBERNDORFER • PFOfE5510N�L COPVOR1T10N The Honorabfe Chen�l Cox. �9a��or Members of the Cit�� Council Cit�� of Chula Vista April 14, 2014 Pa�e 2 `�(c) Sienificant Effecr. A cateeorical esemption shall not be used for any activity �vhere there is u reuso�rable possibrliry that the acti��ity ��ill have a sienificant effect on the em�ironment due to :uursucd circtunslcutces." 1'ou ��ill hear from manv neiahbors of the possibilitti� of impacts due to noise and air quality from the location of the loop road ��ith thousands of trips per day no�� located next to the residential nei�hborhood. And. ��ou ��ill hear about their concerns reeazdin� shado��ine from a structure that is desiened to be nearl�� three times the heieht allowed in this zone and located to the south�vest of their homes. 1'ou �i�ill also hear about concerns of noise from car alarms in this concrete structure to be located rieht above their homes and from the noise created by locatine the ele��ator equipment in the air rather than on the eround ��ithin the hospital property. Impacts from the liehting of the to�ver are additional concerns to these residents. CEQA requires that these impacts be studied and alternative desiens be considered such as construction ��ithin a reasonable de��iation from the heisht of the e�isting buildines and locating the equipment on the eround to eliminate this huee to�ver. � Both of these provisions of section 1�300.2 are applicable as the impacts from the development of the hospital campus is most certainl�� cumulative. Funher. althoueh the uniqueness of this project is obvious, the "uniqueness" referenced in subsection (c) is expressh� ackno��ledged by Cin� staff in the revised Ordinance laneuaee: "The intent of the precise plan. as described in CV�4C 19.�6.041. is to allo�� reeulatory flexibility in instances �vhere the site has :u7iqire n�n�ibutes cutd re9uires specrn(hancllutg." (Ordinance, p.3, lines 7-9). The infill e�emption may not be relied upon ��hen either of these cases presents itself, as here. Inapplicabilih• of Section 15332. The De��elopment Services A9emo of April 10 is also in error in that it concludes that the project is consistent ��ith the General Plan and the applicable Zonine Ordinances. The current zonine applicable to this propert�� allo��s onl}� 4� feet in heieht. Thus, ��hen the rezaiing and eeneral plan studies ��ere completed; that is «�hat ��as studied, not the proposed 120 feet..The use of the Precise Plan �ehicle to circumvent doine CEQA smdies is not sustainable under the la�v. 7he ��ariations �vith the zone, such as the heieht, must be studied for the ��arious potential impacts. Sec[ion 1�332 requires that the '`infill developmenr' stricth� comply �cith the existing (not proposed) zonine to qualifv for the exemption. A/cOt�ee�t i� 11-lid-Pe�ii�zstdn Regro�7ul Ope�i Spnce (1988) 202 CA3rd 1 136 specifically reiterated this "strictness ' rule. FISCHBECK B� OBERNDORFER � ♦ OROfE5510N�L COPVOR�TION The Honorable Chervl Cox. \4avor �4embers of the Citv Council Citv of Chula Vista April 14, 2014 Paee 3 \�'hat is required by CEQA is that these possiblv significant impacts be studied under the directions provided b}� the Code. \'either staff, the public nor the Council can tell at this staee ��hether the design proposed is appropriate until these potential impacts are fully ��etted in the CEQA process. This is not a "technical" objection to the process implemented at this point. This is the �va}� ��e eet to the real crux of ho«�this e�tremely imposine proposal should be handled by the Council. Studies done in compliance ��ith CEQA �vill provide guidance to the Council and the public. Thev may alle��iate concerns or they gi��e direction to desien altemati��es that �vill reduce the impacts. Failure to Provide Adequate Opportunit�� to bc Hcard. Finallv, your packet contains revised Ordinance lan�ua,e rel}�in� on "technical letters" b�� esperts discussing the lack of impacts. That revised laneuaee ��as onl}� completed late on Thursda��, April 10`h; �vith reference to those letters of the same date. The letters �vere not made a�ailable to the public and the Cit}� offices ��ere closed Prida}�. \'either this office nor the public ha��e had an opportunit}� to re��ie�v and investieate those technical letters as required by California la�� and your ordinances. This matter should not be heard by the Council for action until reasonable time has been provided for the public to revie�v the ordinance laneuaee and any technical reports relied upon for the claim of CEQA exemption. Respectfully submitted, �./`-' � \Nilliam . Fischbeck �'�'LF:d�� cc: Glen R. Goo�ins, Esq., Ciq� Attorne�� Kell}� Brouehton, Director of Development Services, Cit�� of Chula Vista Bella Sol HOA WY��lk�r► �o►nrnuhica�-�'ov�S t-Fe-r►� -I#-� Elizabeth Briggs From: mbruning < Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 12:55 PM To: CityClerk Subject: No on Zoning law Sharp Hospital Parking Structure Good Afternoon Mayor Cox and Chula Vista City Council, I'm contacting you to urge you to vote NO on the zoning law that would allow Sharp Hospital parking structure to be built above the Bella Sol community. This would be terrible for all the home owners in the immediate and surrounding communities.We specify chose our home and community over 10 years ago for the nice views and just how pleasant it is here.The impact on our current home values, privacy, traffic, noise, lighting, peaceful views and neighborhood cleanliness would be devastating. I urge you to vote NO. Thank you very much. Mark& Laurie Bruning Chula Vista, Ca. 91911 1 Writkcr► covnmunicafi'ons I-4tm �1 Elizabeth Briggs From: Sheila Antonio < Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 2:49 PM To: 'mcox@chulavistaca.gov' Cc: 'pbensousssan@chulavistaca.gov'; Rudy Ramirez; Mary Salas; CityClerk Subject: Bella Sol Homeowner - Sharp Parking Structure Importance: High Dear Mayor Cox, I am a long time resident of Chula Vista (lived in Otay Ranch and now living in Sunbow). I moved into the Bella Sol community of Sunbow in 2003. I am the original owner of my home. I chose living in Bella Sol because it's secluded, safe and quiet. I have a relatively young family. I am a single mom to 3 kids (14,4 and a newborn). Upon hearing that a parking structure will be built near my home which will include a loop road next to the western border of Bella Sol, I was not happy. IYs enough that I have accepted the noises from the ambulances that drive by, the sounds of cars off of Telegraph Canyon road and the occasional helicopter landing to transport patients to the hospital. These were concerns that I have taken into co�sideration before accepting buying the home. However, I didn't think that a loop road would be built which will bring in traffic, more noise and random people to a parking structure adjacent to my home. Has there been an environmental impact analysis of this proposed structure? Do the citizens/homeowners around the neighborhood have a say on whether this structure can be built? Shouldn't we have to vote on this? After all, we are paying properiy taxes, we live near the construction site, we will have to deal with the influx of traffic and people coming in and out of the parking structure. In addition, the parking structure will look over our homes and possibly invade privacy. I love the community I live in. I don't want to have to pack up my belongings and find another place to live should having the parking structure located adjacent to our community disrupt our lives. I just feel like we, as homeowners, should have a say. I know I'm just one person...but I feel that sometimes governments give in to the"big companies" instead of listening to the little people like myself. Thank you for taking the time to read my email. Sheila Antonio Bella Sol Homeowner for 11 years 7-his email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and ma�� contain confidential information. An}� unauthorized revie��, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If vou are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by replv email and destro�� all copies oFthe orieinal message. i wri�4cn Cornvnunica�ian l-4�.m �-1 Kerry Bigelow From: Elizzbeth Briggs on behalf of CityQerk Sent: Monday, April 07, 20i4 1130 AM To: Kerry Bigelow; Sheree Kansas; leff Steichen Su6ject: FW: Sharp Hospital - PCM 13-22/DRC 13-31 Sharp Hospitalcorrespond=nce. From: william miller [ Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 11:24 AM To: CityClerk Cc: Subject: Sharp Hospital - PCM 13-22/DRC 13-31 Council Vfembers: On Tuesdav; April 8th, a cin council hearins �iill be held to approve a proposed pazking strucrure and loop road on the Sharp Chula Vista Medical Cenrer campus (Sharp). To build the sis-story, 71S space pazkinQ scrucrure; Sharp is requestina to increase the existing buildin� heieht limit from =}� feet to 120 feet. On top of thz-sik ston pazkin� strucmre, will bz a 2� foot tower which �vill remain illuminated throu�hout the nisht. I am a rzsident of the Bzlla Sol community which encompasses 108 homes in the Sunbo�v communirv. The pazkin� strucmre and loop road «ill be on the southw�estem and westem borders of Bella SoL Since both thz parkinQ structure and road are on a hill approximately 40 feet above our communiri�, the� will be ��isiblz to most if not ali of the homes in the Bella Sol comples. I am not opposed to Sharp increasin� its parking and improving vehicle circulation tiithin theu campus. I am concemed that this project possess szveral envuonmental risks to thz Bella Sol residences ��hich need to be smdied and considered beforz approvin� this project. These risks have not yet been quantified becausz the pazkinQ structure and loop road �vere made exempt from havina an environmental rzvie�v. The follo�tiina �ras the rational receive in the Planning Commission AQenda Statement (PC.4S) for the absencz of an environmental review: "Ihe Development Services Director has revie«�ed the proposed project for compliance with the California En��uonmentai Qualiry Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project qualifies for Class 32 cate�orical e.remption pursuant to the Section 1�332 (In-Fill Development Project) of the statz CEQA Guidelines. Thus; no furchzr envuonmen[al review is necessarv." Given thz pazkine structure's hei�ht; close protimin'; 2=F hour illumination and southwzstem location, the environmental impacu of shadowine of homes, inhibitina the effecti�eness of solaz panels; car alazm noise, light spillage; and visual obstructions need to be studied and quantified. R%ith thz parkine structure; Sharp «�ill increase iu pazkins spaces to 2,3�4. Sharp estunated in the PCAS; that approtima[eh �0 percent of the vehicles �vill use the nzw�l�� constructed loop road. Given the pazkin� spaces and Sharp's usage estunatzs; it would be a reasonable assumpcion that there «ill now bz thousands of cars per ��zek that will travel on the newl� constructed loop road on Bzlla Sol's western border. This amount of traffic war.anu an en�ironmentai mmpact srud� to deternune n�c noise; vehicle emission. and liahc spilla�e at night. On Tuesdav; please requue that an environmental smdv be done on both the proposed parkinQ strucnue and loop road so that the environmental unpact to the surroundinQ communitc is understood before appro�°inQ this project. Thank �ou for vour timz and consideration on this maner. Bill �4iller Bella Sol Resident and Board i�tembzr z VYri-}kn c�mmunicac:iiovc (-�cna-#� -1 Kerry Bigelow From: Elizabeth Briggs on behal�o�CityClerk Sent: Monday,April 07, 2014 2:�3 PM To: Kerry Sigelow, Shere= Kansas; Je`Steichen Subject: FW: Sharp Hospital --case rile no. PCM 13-22/DRC 13-3i Sharp correspondencz -- From: Steven Ray [ Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 2:21 PM To: CityQzrk Cc: Kerry Bigelow Subjed: Sharp Hospital --case file no. PCM 13-22/DRC 13-31 kcr'sl 3, ZOi� 'a: A�favor dnd =s_e°mc Caun�!mer�;s, Gc�GLrk =rom: Sav? iay, Sua�O'r✓25rC2r1!ct:d fom�t�lia Sol 3o�rd PR�r�e: 3uLyect_ Sl��Hosp�I Gasa =c[e no. rC�,i ;3'?±L1F.0 i;31 F.s a r=_sidani artd hon�vmer in via area�Far�e aro�o�� projxt sita, I v:ould 2ppraciace yaur ronsicer�.io,-�cf r,�y concems and reu�.^mendatio�s summariz� belotv. E und�rst�r.-�Jtat i�nc�-�gs�re crc:tial ic jtts�'i Ti ar.y�pubCic�won 2nit�,usaon if�OSB^�E lR u�l°.��3�iRl�d'j COlTiRtISSfOn�Ch7i I and=4.��f2DOfI. . t. The�=_ightanc bul<os.he �ro��p�''.tiny towerevi:l deir2u;am _ o3ier.vi�pfezs-r.t 2nd�Exc��u�7tta3 viaws Of:h2 R�=n, Caro�t2do w�dea are�re�'72CUVe;ti5h-.^sr'.5 0�dow;�ov+n San Di�o ttom rty prcFerN - 2nc cih�rs. " T'nil:�sid=n?i23 qvzlF:y on r�ny s�eets v�i;i:Jso Fie 2�C�ied 6y�Il°r s�:cturE(s)vis�ole�6ove h�^ies. li is ircar�ty�taied in�`�e stafi n_por ic th� Pla�ning C.^.rr,�ission th�i ' ;he r�iic.1 cenus pro�_try is higher�an ali surovndinc;esid3n:i31 .. . p;ot+erti�g. My o�opB,'V is hieher. !n a:�Ji50n,e��an.hose�favr2� � ztev�5pn a;e�,^t2as3 by ur°taller s-!ica;es a6ovz. 2_ Thera ha;,bezr,no visual �r.alysis by the Pl2nnirg Oep�.,desace � � -- C4nCVliiS f21S?'�.�i Th2 Cammuniv��i�LTi�. PiOj�T CORSU�ief7Z�W9r� � . .9iJen a pho.o of d vi2w�;ih2 hosp't.al preper�/4om my hou��:att?r offerirg to pio+dde§ome i�gu:on ch°vis�al ina:c� P:on°vr2s prov[detl i, � tetum, ,a siie ptain�r ar la�dsc��e rrc�i:e�or�-:,�vho is E=miliar wiG� si�izvzls znd 2ny^Ix ef�fi°v;and xrs�zctF,e co�:d�=t,a°ctis. � 3. Stf;f sa°�ris co h2v2 avoid�d inp�t�tia,the re�ntlt�built m2dcal buiicirb3 i; . una:*actve and��i Sh?�can be eap�ed to��ld oL'�.:rs sirralar:o it rict a�1y `.ilock'nc vicv.�s�u;el.;o�ea�ng un3:trattive'ones. ;-i2s�e Ci�.�s ' d�sign ravi��::acWFity improve�arrJ��ing icom wh2t w2s orig:^affy Nrcpoc�� . . . -. i ncre is no:�for;mad°Eo addre^.>s mr.cems r^�esec�tlte c�rtr.unit;� - � r.��r-g.o s��ei�i iign'�rr3 e�:a�f;om v,�:vn GSe par'.{ing SJUCn�r�, such� by iabric,a�gl�louvar elerwnU^or o:nEr archit.��s�!sc��nirtg m a�v3 oAe�areas o�e>-�ro:wa13s_ 2 o. Accac�al!i�:h�r;.r!f rc�cr:ly qra�?=vnth enicua u r views�om iieh=_r P(07°R12S;Si N'1{I reduca�njayrr�r�:o;c��k s'.��.i.e., s:�rs ar� as,roncmicai o�s.�rvadon.inr all: 6, T,�e ?`�9�aot'a�L Lcit� Fovte:sez�ru unnec�°.:;;.�.ry asi�rf�ll m2i�ly�e seen oy�arby r-sida�ts, no�provdc circcti�n to h�:i4.1 p�:rars k,okir.� fcr u,a parkiric s�-uc�r_2s allac�� by fha�roiect(srGFanznts. Di;zcSr,r=� sigr,i�g wa.�ld accamp!i��at 7. Tn2 in�:r2as2 3:�ar'vng spacas ira^�th=_ 7 c�G requR?� by Giy develoam°n�s:W�dards to��e aro^asad num�er cf 2,3Y,wi:Ytout any . 2ednonal hcs_y,al s,�c or�e�ic21 c��iGes 5=erls unn�zss=.ry. ��,ure . develeament shovld ty ;eviewed a�:he sa-e tina�s scch a mGjor preposzl as�:s ,,ar::ing shucture. 8_ 7n rrr;knotivt�.,-'c�,-ttta Galifomia -nvironr„_rr-J Q:.�ati?/Act reau�res th;� lead a9enc�?s,ci�es, review L�impacts of�+e whale%�f a projsi, noi jw� piec2meal propasats_ The propa:Kai urc.ier consideraticn seerru onty z piece,'�eai cor�ider�e„_ �vC�r$h��rranFed to h3v3 excesu p<?ana � avutlanle, h0�•r tovld�Tne nc't censi�=r,his cc:�ld irCuce iur�es crrnv�t in tne h.?�re? - . . � - [.ot even the er<<ire n�cal cente�o�Op7c�25 2�e ur,d=_r considara�on(nr„ outtir�d as p.:.�a!th2 peoject s�e)«::h this prepcs2l, and pu5fic no�c� . do?;no;seem.o have b_=_n provided o�+=he bxis oi u�e distzn�:e irem tne Lrounda�ies o��e erti;e oroo=rty b�n raJ-Pr jus:h�par�ei b:t v:niG� the �arkinc st1!c�e.'u^ �oKs..^s�.° 1 weuld no�b�2•:ra_re ot th�pro�os�l _. ez�n!fof co�itinued coriaci vr.h a 3ena Sal Eoare! Niemb Vr. - P.Iso, I befiE•;€C-QA do� not atk�w ih= appticatan ot cat�o�ical . �xcle�:ons',�s�ch�;�e on=.proposed in thi;projecc.-w�hen tn=_=z�.3�y . �o�t li�2i�e project mzy not rasult in a signi�cc.ni c��ec'�on iha environmen�. Gcn Gi=ub�.�in;�i eXempaor.even 6�conaid�e�' if ihe projec mav�nvibute to iur��er un�lanne:��zloo:ne�t? � �o ln zdcitiort,L'�°:.arking srttCw�2 CCL'I�fA,icnri to cu�rent h�_u-;t fi�i� arxl stiil sub5'�nt:�ily improv� parkina op?io.^.s ia,-:h° iw^�e"r�l iacilnzs. � .IT�-GL'72 2 5vuc[ura 3�.�as talf N.�stiil aboi..300�'�tur2�>acz:ar - �� censid�r pu�i�3 more parking fzv=_!s under�round. . t0.There is alse;�•�cem far shacor;s and a;��on �IMr aec�ss to nazr�y resicences. i ne six-�tory 2nd i 20 fi� hi�n to�uer v:?I need t4 bc coeuice:ed r�-.::ive:e i�s highi etav�5�n, upecia�ry to raeurby romes tc 3 ih2 nor,n in =alla Sr��s aso cc c'ner�-2=. Tr.nr has b��n nc s:�uc�/5:acow 2.RaFysv '�y �_° �Id�n;nc D°fJa,'Cnz�' 1 i.Cc^cPm inr rise ca�„a?e p�:%ar,g sau�c:r2�v?c a_75o i4i5�;2.'�ia Comrnur,i;;�,r�ar.y:i.e.,fren ca'J2r��l r�oi�s�reiivt�.'oU��':�d a�d dovmw=_rd`rom��e nar6-surf=.�: ceti�es on ea�Fzr4irg In;el. 72.Cti r_�rn v+�as 21so rais�'� 2?�7��ommur�ry me_�ry-on the�ropos� 1-�p � ro�d�nc i;a e"r"eCS ir ne2rby resi�en�_ Th2s2 oocential ir�pac5 ir�cicw� ��mc roise: light exhn�.4'Si/�JG11:.t12 2lll"a�iOfTS diln S'c.�2hf� c^Sa?f'c��y 4Ytu'l [h� �o;en:Ff,or d2fi��ery vehicl_s,em�;g_ncy veh�t�s,znd h��e:�aus V.'cSi?W!kc=SeR. - � - t 3.Ta11 s:ruc'�.�res ne�r ll�°top c;�e hilt,can su��aniiaify aY�.vinds in iFu �2a.au�lly res�lc�g in hig:,er Y�rin�g�cs. tn sumr,�.ry, plaas�consiaer these r�comme�a�ons: A. kt�iniairing current F�ight lim�s e. ReOUdng [h�amoun,of prop�ed puking 2ndlor providing it u�tt:ecgro�;nd. � C. Screen L'�=o�=rt�r=_-rior vnils of�e oar:am;levels, a,�d g�neraify zvadr�::ny increase 1n c��=rer lightinc io r<:�rt=in dark s':d=s in��arec. D. Jiminatira�a Gg:*��tovrer_ li 2 tc�+er is nee��±�ar n2rhani�l - _ �Ui9m°n:, it StMU1d:25FcG�t=c[:rre�i fiei;_ht 3:��tit Gnd not be 1''gnfec. E. G��2�thz 2bserw af arrv 2�vironm�n!�1 str,dy, conCuci ih:��olFO�.�g � s,^�dis5=�=(�sis of visual impac{. �is=;sola 2c��,lignt.�nd glar�,. - shadelsfl2Cows.�:k akies,r�.ro-climatzh•.in�e�ms.a�d vehi�tar e„��ssicns. -. tieviewinc prop��d p.=Y+dnc rz�vri�a��ticip2teu'�t7airz g°va�n��.ait �t2r:k you icr yaur 2C2niJn ta�7is_ � ' S'?EV2 ,'-�dV � ..`�� !�) ' . � _ - � ��.� . . . � -%� V�tri� �,pyr�muni C��DnS l�m �:--1 Kerry Bigelow From: Elizabeth Briggs on behalf of CityClerk Sent: Monday, April 07, 20i4 2:5� PM To: Kerry Bigelow; Sheree Kansas;Je��Steichen Subjed: FW: CASE �PCM li-22/DRC 13-31 - NOTICE OF PUoLC NE=,RING BY THE CTY COUNQL OF THE Cn`(OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA AP2L 3, 201? Importance: High More -- From: David M. Lipps [ Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 1:19 PM To: CityCterk Cc: Kerry Bigelow Subject: CASE =PCM 13-22/DRC 13-31 - NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNQL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA APRIL 8, 2014 Importance: High On Tuesdav; April 8th; a cin- council hearin� will bz heid to approve a proposed pazkina structure and loop road on the Sharp Chula V'ista viedical Center campus (Sharp). To build the six-stor}�; 71 S space parking strucrure, Sharp is rzquestine to increase the esistina buildina heiaht limit from �� feet to 120 feet. On [op of the-sis storv pazkin� strucrure; will be a 2� foot tow�zr w-hich�i�ll remain illuminatzd throughout the niQht. I am a resident of the Bella Sol communit}' which encompasses I OS homes in the Sunbo�v community. The pad:ing strucrure and loop road will be on the south«-estem and �vestern borders of Bella Sol. Since both the pazking structure and road aze on a hill appro�imately 40 feet above our communin�; they will be visible ro most if not all of the homes in the Bella Sol comples. I am not opposed to Sharp increasine i[s pazkin� and unprovin� vehicle circulation within their campus. I am concemed that this project possess several environmental risks to the Bella Sol residznces which need to be smdied and considered before approvin� this project. These risks have not vet bzen quantified because the parkinQ strucrure and loop road were made esempt from havin� an environmental rz�iew. Ihe followinQ �cas the rational rzcei�e in the Plannins Coaunission AQznda Statement(PCAS) for the absence of an environmental revie«: "The Development Ser�ices Director has reviewed the proposed project for compliance �vith the Califomia Envuonmental Qualin Act (CEQA) and has determinzd that the project qualifizs for Class 32 cateQorical exemption pursuant to the Section 1�332 (In-Fill Development Project) of the state CEQA Guidelines. Thus; no funher environmental review is necessary." Given thz pazkina structure's heiaht, close prosimity_ 21 hour illumination and south�ti�estem location; the envuonmental unpacts of shadowine of homzs, inhibitine the effectiveness of solaz panzls, car alarm noise; li�ht spillaaz, and visual obstructions need to bz smdied and quantifizd. R%ich chz pazking strucmre; Sharp will increase its pazking spaces to 2;3�=4. Sharp zstimatzd in che PCAS, that approsunatel� �0 ozrcenc of the vzhicles will ase thz nzw1�- constructed loop road. Given the parkine spaces and Sharp's usaaz estimates, it would be a reasonable assumption that there will now be chousands of cazs per week that �vill travel on the �z«Iv constructed loop road on Bella Sol's �tiestern border. This amount of traffic �tiarants an environmental impact smd� to determine traffic noise; vehicle emission, and liQht spillaQe at niQht. On Tuesda�, please require that an environmental studv be done on both the proposed parl:inQ structure and loop road so that the environmental impact to the surroundina comcnunin is understood before approving this proj ect. Thank�ou for vour time and consideration on this matter. David M. Lipps Chula Vista, CA 91911 2 wr►�}eri cor►�rv�un�ca�fions l�c.wt �k, _ Kerry Bigelow Y From: Elizabeth Briggs on b=hal�o�CityClerk Sent: . Monday, April 07, 2014 2:5" PM To: Kerry Bigelow; Sheree Kansas; 1>�f Steichen Subject: FW: CASE :�PCM 13-22/DRC 13-3i - NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CIY COUNCIL OF THE QTY Of CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA APRIL 8, 2014 More — From: )eff And David [ Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 1:22 PM To: CityQerk Cc: Kerry 6igelow Subject: CASE TPCM 13-22/DRC 13-31 - N07ICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE QTY COUNCIL OF TNE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA APRIL 8, 2014 " On Tuesda�;�1pri1 8th, a city council hearine will be held to approve a proposed parkin�strutture and loop road on the Sharp Chula Vista��Iedical Center campus (Shazp). To build the six-ston•, 713 space pukin�structure, Sharp is reques[in�eo increase che e�cisrina buildin�height limit from 4� feec to 120 fee[. On top of the-six story parl:ine structure; will be a 25 foo[to�cer which will remain illuminated chrou�out the nieht. I am a rzsidznt of the BeLla Sol community which encompasses l OS homes in the Sunbow community. The parking snucnue and loop road w�ll be on the southwestem and wesiem borders of Bella SoL Since both the pazl:ing strucnue and road aze on a hill approximacel}•40 feet above our community,they will be visible co mosc if�ot all of the homes in the Bella Sol complex. I am not opposed to Sharp increasing iu parking and improving vehicle circulation within their campus. I am concemed that this projec[possess several environmental risl's to the Bella Sol residences which need to be studied and considered before approvina this project. Thzse risl:;have not yet been quantified because the pad:in�structure and loop road were made exemp[from having au environmental review. The followin�waz the rational receive in the Plannine Commission A�enda Statement(PCAS)for the absence of an environmental review: � "The Dzvelopment Services D'uector has reviewed[he proposed projec[ for compliance with che California Environmental Qualicy Act(CEQA)and has de[ermined that the project qualifies For Class 32 catz�orical exempcion pursuant co the Sec[ion 1�332 (In-Fill � Development Project)of the state CEQA Guidelines. Thus,no fur[her envuonmenral review is necessary." Given thz pazL.in�ssucture's heiohL close proximity,2�hour iLlumination and southwestem loca[ion, the environtnental impacs of shadowine of homes, inhibiting the effeccive�ess of solar panels, caz alarm noise, lieht spilla�e, and visual obstructions nezd co be studied and quanti5ed. \Vith the pazkina sffucture, Sharp will increase its parl:ing spaces to 2,3�4. Sharp esrimated in ihe PCAS,that approximately 50 percent of thz vehicles�rill use the newly consffucted loop road. Given the pazkine spaces and Shazp's usase estimate;, it would be a reasonable assumpdon that tlizre will now be thousaods of cars per wzek that will vavel on the newly tonstructed loop road on Bella Sol's wescem bordec I'his amounc of�affic warrants an enduonmental impaci srudy co dzcermine vaffic noise, vehicle emission,and liaht spillasz at niaht. On Tuzsday,plzuz require that an environmental srudy be done on both the proposed pazkin�svucture and loop road so ct�at the endvonmenral impact to the surroundin�community is underscood before approvins chis project. Thank��ou for vour cimz and considzracion on this matter. Jeffen�S.Pinklzv Chula V"ista C.4 91911 wr�-+� cow�vn uh�ca�or�s �-le��-� Kerry Bigelow From: Tyshar Turner on behalf of CityClerk Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 10:45 AM To: Jeff Steichen; Kerry Bigelow Subject: FW: serious concern �Tyshar From: Kelsey Courneya [ Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 10:09 AM To: CityClerk Subject: serious concern 7o the office of the cit�• clerk. I �;•ould like to express m} extreme concem reeazdina the proposed parkinQ strucrure that Sharp Hospital is trcinQ to build. I am a resident of the Bella Sol communitv and am hiehly against this proposed pazking structure. If I didn't have 2 scheduled appointments todav; I would be at the 4 pm ciri� council meeting this afremoon to express my concem in person. \4�� concems are as follows: -shado��ine of homes in the afrernoon; especially in the «Rnter -pm ac}° issues as homes can be viewed from pazking strucmre and road above; more unportanth� the children in these homes can be seen -caz alarms �oine off both dav and nieht from the open floor pazl:in� structure . -vzhiculaz emissions and noise from the thousands of cazs per week -liehtinQ from structure and road leal:ine onto the homes below -unpleasant��ie�v of illuminated pazkinQ levels and tower throughout the night -visual impact as the cleaz blue skies to the southw°est u�ill no�v be a 12-story parking structure Please do not pass the proposal that Sharp Hospital is puttins before vou. Please do not build this pazkina structure. The communin of Bella Sol is at a serious disadvantaQe and Nill be greatly disappointed if�ou let the parl:ing strucrure be built. Thacil: �ou for �aur time. kelsev Courne�a Bella Sol resident i Aztd�-}i ov�a.t Ih�rrvut�F-icv, i-Eem �`1 � April 10. 201� n4r. Matthe�r Teichner Facilities Manaaement R De��elopment Sharp Healthcaze fngineasBPlanners 8�20 Tech �Vav T`a"" San Dieeo. CA 92123 TranSpertaLOn " Parking LLG Reference: 3-li-2265 uns�on law s RE: Sharp CV Parl:ing Garage and Loop Road GreempaREngirtee+s 4542 ftuffner Saeet Dear D4r. Teichner: s�ae ioo San Diego,L192111 858300.8ffiU t Per your request. Linscott, La�v R Greenspan; EnQineers (LLG) has revie��ed the �� potential for increased traffic eeneration and conaestion associated with the proposed vrvnv.11gencinee¢con parkin� oaraoe and loop road for the Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center Campus. \io increase in building square foota�e is proposed. P,,,aetd Irvine «'hile time constraints preclude a formal assessment of the projecYs intemal SanUiego circulation; we nore that neither the proposed parkine earase nor the loop road are �tbodlandNlls classified as traffic eenerators. The project is desioned to improve both parking conditions and traffic circulation within the site and no increase in traffic is anticipated as a result of the project. A parking study prepared by AVRP demonstrates that the proposed parkin� garage and associated surface parking improvements would increase onsite parkina from 1,746 spaces to 2.3�4 spaces, a net increase of 782 parking spaces. \�'hile some _ existino parkina will be lost during construction of the project, at no time will the available parkina supply fall below the 1,�20 spaces required by the City of Chula Vista Municipal Code. 7�he loop road provides ingress and earess at nvo locations on Aledical Center Court and will ensure 000d access to the proposed pazkine eara�e and esisting surface lots is provided. The maximum r1DT expected on the loop road based on a preliminary assessment is 4.000 ADT. This is the ma�imum ADT that is currentiv accessine the site at a project dri��e��•ay. The loop road �vill have a capacity of about 8,000 rlDT and therefore ��ill be able to easih� accommodate the 4.000 ADT volume. The parking garage and loop road �vould not be expected to have am� impact on traffic or parking conditions on Medical Center Court or other .earby streets. Please call me �vith any questions. PIGfq M W¢roG?EUS:a� !xk M.Gramsoaq 7E IMU S 171C2Ce1\'. N'AUn A.Iaw.7�1�.1 Linscott, Law R Greenspan, Engineers PauIW.WJkinS�n.?E �`� =ohn P.Keawg.oc OaviE S.SbeMer.PE John Boarman. P.E. �^^^^.�a^^:^.'E ]�i1nCiP3� � GanM:whJaegec?E Califomia Re�istration: C �0033 �chardE5�rteca.fE Ke�I�.Ma�erry.Pc N lc"h13 C:nan/."vwtt0�.Si \__S�.T�ic Intt Ot 101� \t-1T dicz Addi}iona.i In�'orrna+io►-, H�wi #�-1 �� Atkins North America,Inc. 3570 Cartnei Mountain Road,Suite 300 San Dieqo,Califomia 92t 30 Telephone:+7.858.874.1810 Faz:+1.858.259.07�t www.atkinsg loba I.coMnorthameri ca April 10, 2014 Mr. Matthew Teichner Facilities Management&Development Sharp Healthcare 8520 Tech W ay San Diego,CA 92123 Subject: Noise Impact Analysis Sharp Chula Vista Parking Garage and Loop Road City of Chula Vista,San Diego County,California Dear Mr.Teichner: This letter report provides an analysis of the potential traffic noise impacts of the Sharp Chula Vista Parking Garage and Loop Road Project (project) in compliance with City of Chula Vista Noise Compatibility Guidelines. BACKGROUND Noise is typically defined as unwanted sound. Sound pressure magnitude is measured and quantified using a logarithmic ratio of pressures, the scale of which gives the level of sound in decibels (d8). To account for the pitch of sounds and the corresponding sensitivity of human hearing to them, the raw sound pressure level is adjusted with an A-weighting scheme based.on frequency that is stated in units of decibels (dBA). For example, the typical A-weighted noise level of a jet fly over at 1,000 feet is 110 dBA, a commercial area with heavy traffic at 300 feet is 60 dBA, and inside a library is 30 dBA (Caltrans 1998). A given level of noise would be more or less tolerable depending on the sound level, duration of exposure, character of the noise sources,time of day during which the noise is experienced, and activity affected by the noise. For example, noise that occurs at night tends to be more disturbing than that which occurs during the day because sleep has the potential to be disturbed. In consideration of these factors, different measures of noise exposure have been developed to quantify the extent of the effects anticipated from these activities. Equivalent Energy level (Leq) is the average acoustical or sound energy content of noise, measured during a prescribed period, such as 15 minutes cr 1 hour. The Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) is the average equivalent A-weighted sound level over a 24- hour period. This measurement applies weights to noise levels during evening and nighttime hours :o compensate for the increased disturbance response of people at those times. CNEL is the equivalent sound level for a 24-hour period with a +5 dBA weighting applied to all sound occurring between 7:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. and a +10 dBA weighting applied to all sound occurring between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. The decibel level of a sound decreases (or attenuates) exponentially as the distance from the source of that sound increases. For a single point source such as a piece of inechanical equipment, the sound Mr.Matthew Teichner p�� April 10,2014 ,e , Page 2 of 3 level normaily decreases by about 6 dBA for each doubling of distance from the source. Sound that originates from a linear, or "line" source such as a heavily traveled traffic corridor, attenuates by approximately 3 dBA per doubling of distance, provided that the surrounding site conditions lack ground effects or obstacles that either scatter or reflect noise. Other contributing factors that affect sound reception include meteorological conditions, natural topography, and the presence of manmade obstacles such as buildings and sound barriers. REGULATORYSETTING The Environmental Element of the Chula Vista General Plan contains goals and policies related to environmental noise in Section 3.5, Noise. The General Plan defines noise sensitive land uses (NSLU) as residences, schools, hospitals, librarles, parks, and places of worship. To establish the compatibility of various land uses with exterior noise levels, the City uses CNEL in its planning guidelines. Table 5.5-1 illustrates Chula Vista's exterior land use noise compatibility guidelines. Shading in this ta61e represents the maximum noise level considered compatible for each land use category.These guidelines reflect[he levels of noise exposure that are generally considered to be compatible with various types of land uses. The City of Chula Vista states that these guidelines are to be used at the land use planning stage, for ,_ noise impact assessments,and to determine mitigation requirements for developmen[proposals. Table 1 Exterior Land Use/Noise Compatibility Guidelines Annual CNEL in deci6els WndUse 50 55 60 65 70 75I Residential �;}�r y�'��."' '. �-�-ay��-'��r. Schools,Li6raries,Daycare Facilities,Convalescent Homes,Ou:coor ;;"�,��"�'=�;,I;�;F,�=N��}`�.+s' Use Areas,and O[her Similar Uses Considered Noise Sensitive �- �"'_'��#-�'-�-�i=��ti•, .R.`...a.i*.s�L-i��r�.:.� Neighborhood Parks,Playgrounds 3�:?s`�.�.y'�:�v=`�_��"� Communi Parks,Athletic Fields °:�=�'"�� r�''�?�'G��-i'Y`S�'�`-'Y`- N ..�_v_s��„�._��=,��,L-�-a,. 5�--��a-^.---�-°;x�'''�c i,rr�a�'.<.-a Ofices and Professional iy,�'" s r��=•,.;,�.+v:�'=�;,.,y;�„,,..__i�5+ Places of Worship(exduding ouidoor use areas) ?��r,�j�� r-f'l,_-'r-.��,��-� �i.�, ,°��.�"' Golf Courses '°�ia;=�_al�'`��C''�'-ti+-a�a'. C-`�°''�"�:f>+rt:^e-- mx+,4§ "*a�r_,`,-_�'S......:`3'ls::_aa�e..::�'`3�e?�S.�.s�f`� isi��:��._�:��"+`''1": ;^x^u a-^�� Re[ail and Wholesale Commercial,Aesiaurants,Movie Theaters ��,�,�„�-�,':;?��.'y�•-�., -�=i,;�?�,.;__ s"�f'�'P'`�,�. c-v-r"'._�`_'"°'.�:.a'•re.�.��!�-_ Industrial,Manufacmring ��,LL �,.,_�rps,,a,_� .t,,;,�.' w; ,� r"� ' . Note:Shading represen[s the maximum noise level considered compa[ible for each land use category. Source:City of Chula vs2a 2005 STANDARDS Of SIGNIFICANCE An impact would occur if project-generated traffic would result in roadway noise that exceeds 65 d6A CNEL,which is the most conservative noise compatibility guideline. POTENTIAL NOISE IMPACT The maximum average daily trips (ADT) expecYed on the proposed loop road is 4,000 ADT (LLG 2014�. Traffic noise that would result from this ADT is assessed using standard noise modeling equations adapted from the FHWA noise prediction model. The estimates are conservative because the model does not take into account buildings or topography that would provide noise attenuation. The model Mc Matthew Teichner ��' � O � April S0, 2014 t na Page 3 of 3 takes into account roadway width, vehicle mix, speed limit, and ADT. The loop road would have a posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour and a maximum median width of 11 feet. The loop road would generate a noise level of approximately 58 dBA at 50 feet from the roadway centerline. Therefore, the project would not result in roadway noise that exceeds 65 dBA CNEL and would not exceed the Cit�/s Noise Compatibility Guidelines for sensitive land uses. Model output is provided in Attachment A. If you have any questions regarding this analysis, please do not hesitate to call at (858) 514-1030 or email at sharon.toland@atkinsglobal.com. Sincerely, � � �� V� . Sharon Toland Associate Project Manager Attachment A: FHWA model output REFERENCES California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 1998. Technical Noise Supplement. October. Sacramento,CA: Environmental Program, Noise,Air Quality, and Hazardous Waste Management Office. Sacramento, CA.Available at: htto://www.dot.ca.¢ov/hq/env/noise/oub/tens complete.odf. City of Chula Vista. 2005. Chula Vista Vision 2020 General Plan. December 13. linscott law&Greenspan. 2014. Sharp CV Parking Garage and Loop Road Memorandum. LLG Reference: 3-13-2265. April 10. TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL$ANO NOISE CONTOURS Projac�NumEer: 1000?$i01 Projaa Name: S�.arp CV!�oc R;ac BaccgrounG InlomuWn Nx_I 9eL"Paw:: �iWA{gr.raY Nose?:ed-.don Ma0e1l=HWA-FP/i-t08)w%�Cafbeu VMrtie Nase(C.LLVENO)'c.:ussnn leve6. SNaCP O:itdKC VOh11nM: lR�SGG�.ZF'��Ga.4d:..Wi 20:5 ..�^.:LI.Yf�('1068CCSfIPOf: �.N��: )( •Cd'.ow 6 b¢:e0 wV' NG foaawdY�F%ICiraY. As�..—.eC 2n:io�u i 2:Y Ors�DU�On: ��aY =��'+/'C �t Oxan¢is trrr�pe rs�Mme ol Cfe rc�raY segmer.t ic31=DTVOLr.ies i.i0% 12i0% 9.60X bTermzprotbratnr M�.aih:.y ieuocs 5i a3„ 5.�5: i.52% ieavy-JU7 i�udvs _9.:C< 2.9�X 8.069: �es¢� Vehde A1¢ Olsta�xe Imm CenterGfre af Matlway RnayzaCanEltion Mr.:w: 4Di SpeeC Np:a MMum ileavy CNELat DrsunceroCaYwr fi.-.aa.aY.�9�nt Lanes WiC..: VoNne � 1�1 Fador T`ucis Tricics SOFeet ]UC�=L 55CNE�_ 6pCNCl SSCN_', �P A� 4gress i to Ir.qress 2 2 t t a.00p 25 0.5 2 0% t.PL 5]5 - . - TJ a:�.n�sc�.cae.5 '9S1 s��N2G:a WRiffen C'��nm/u.��afi��s �� i- J� / VI I i � / , Tyshar Turner From: mike.agunod@live. Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 2:52 PM To: Rudy Ramirez; CityClerk Cc: Subject: Opposition to Sharp Superstructure That will Destroy Community Quality of Life My dear Council Member Rudy Ramirez: I hope this finds you well. I just now learned of a critical issue that will be coming up for a decision this afternoon. My home and the 107 other homes in our quiet sunny neighborhood will be devalued and our quality of life destroyed if the Sharp campus beside our residential community of Bella Sol is allowed to have the residential zoning laws changed to allow Sharp to erect a looming 120 foot parking superstructure over our homes situated on the lower part of the hill. Mayor Cox,the people of Chula Vista have zoning laws precisely to keep this kind of bellicose expansion from happening. We have zones for work, industry, and government, but we also have RESIDENTIAL zones. Sharp knows this and Sharp knew this when they built a small campus in a RESIDENTIAL area with the provision that their highest strudures were not to exceed 45 feet. But now, Sharp wants to change the zoning laws they accepted so they can continue to increase their customer and client base and I dare say, profits, regardless of how detrimental to their neighbors this might be. Rules and laws are there to protect private citizens like you and me, not so they can be flaunted when it suits a big company like Sharp seeking to expand its operations. Of what use is the protection of laws if they can be overturned by an entity like Sharp? What about the people of Chula Vista like the Bella Sol residents around Sharp whose 108 homes will lose their values once the shadow by day of the 120 foot Sharp superstructure obscures the sky and air quality? The structure will cast not only a shadow on our community by day, but will also light up the night with a 3 storey high floodlight illumination tower by night. We will lose the quality of life that we have worked so hard for to achieve. And that is wrong. What about the health of the 108 families living here once the smoke of 2,142 vehicles daily in and out of the garage strudure starts wafting into our homes?(While it is a 714 car garage superstructure, clients will be driving in and out throughout the day.) We worked very hard to have the homes and neighborhood that we have now—the clean fresh air, the blue sky,the quiet stillness of the day and balmy afternoons,the dark starry nights that provide rest and solace in the evening. Closing our windows to suffocate inside is bad for our health. Trying to shut our ears from the sound of engines and vehicles transiting by is not an option. Having passersby and motorists able to look down into our homes from the parking structure above is an outright violation of our privacy. And to have our nights lit and taken away by the glare of the parking garage light tower? No! Right now, my neighbors, my son,and I walk confidently whenever we want with assuredness,ease and safety around our neighborhood, and to and from the parks, grocery store and pharmacy just up the hill and around the bend from our i 9"community. This is what we worked hard for and bought into. If Sharp is allowed to violate current zoning laws by having them changed, we will lose that security and safety. If Sharp wants to build a big campus,they should do it in a zone SPECIFICALLY designated for such a purpose. We have schools and business zones nearby. Sharp cannot and must NOT be allowed to go through with their intent to increase their current campus NOR should zoning laws be changed to accommodate Sharp's expansion. Sharp is more than welcome to stay and serve in Chula Vista and if they wish to expand,they should—but in an area originally and properly designated for such purposes. I and my neighbors SHARPLY oppose Sharp's expansion beside our homes for the reasons so stated above. Thank you, Michael Agunod Longtime Chula Vista Resident and Homeowner z ` - C�x��'�G ,, �`CD ApR 1 � . . ��Fj�� April 16, zoia. 6 2014 RECEIVED Dear Honorable Mayor Cox and Members of the Chula Vista City Council. 74 ,�j,�� P2 .26 Thank you for your time, your empathy, and your willingness to listen to my��r��n��tp��s�H extended surface parking project at 752 and 754 Medical Center Road, Ch�T�i�hE�}fh��jy;�� : Council meeting on April 15, 2014. Especially, the challenge I have with my unit being so close � the back of the medical building located at 752 Medical Center Road. � The main reason I attended the City Council meeting was to get a clear answer on.if there would or would not be a road/driveway/walkway behind my patio wail linking the two � surface parking lots currently under construction. I tried to be proactive by going in person to Sharp hospital builders trailer, and to the City of Chula Vista Planning Dept. where I spoke to Mr. Bautista and Mr. Steichen. I also reached out and connected via telephone with Mr. Matt Teichner when he returned from his vacation. I have been given different answers to my question. I clearly asked Mr. Teichner during our telephone conversation -- i¢ttiere would be a road/driveway looping the two parking lots together and his response was "no this is happening across the street on the hospital side of Medical Center Road" . That the area I was discussing wouid be a landscaped area. I contacted the City of Chula Vista Planning department a second time with two questions, 1) is there a road/driveway/walkway behind my patio wall and how many feet does anything need to be away from my residence. (See attached email response from Mr. Bautista. Mr. Bautista forwarded my second question to Mr. Steichen and he informed me Sft from my building is the answer due to the type of zone the Medical building has at this time. I was grateful to receive a copy of the plans from Mr. Bautista via email. Upon reading over the plans it appeared to me there would be a road/driveway/walkway, lighting, and security cameras. But I still did not have a clear answer to my question on the road/driveway/walkway. Therefore, I decided to come before the City Council for an answer and asked the question again last night. When City Council addressed my cjuestion to staff, Mr. Steichen shut down my question by stating this project was not on the agenda and did not answer the most important question I had been seeking answered. No member of Sharp staff or their team of experts offered an answer although they were available and ready to answer every type of question with regards to the parking structure. In my opinion the surface parking lots are all part of the Sharp Master Project being done in phases. The meeting proceeded and I appreciate the members of City Council requesting Sharp to be a Good Neighbor and keep the immediate neighbors informed which they agreed to do albeit too late for this project. The female speaker from Sharp (Pat, I think as I did not catch her name) told City Council she would like to talk to me after the meeting. Post meeting Pat,(?) did not address me as she left Council Chambers. Sharp already had what they needed from Council to move forward. As I was leaving I reached out and asked Mr. Velez, CEO of Sharp Chula Vista if he could give me a few minutes of his time. He was very gracious and allowed me to talk to him in the hallway. Mr. Matt Teichner joined the conversation, and at one point !Iw Pat (?) from Sharp came over and indicated Matt Teichner, Senior Project Manager was the contact for questions and she left without speaking to me directly. During this conversation, I was finally able to get the answer to the question, and the answer confirmed my fear and biggest concern. Yes, there will be a driveway linking the two parking lots where people can drive from one to another. I was devastated to finally hear this news. During the conversation with Mr. Velez and Mr. Teichner, I felt Mr. Teichner was flippant in his responses to me especially with respect to Sharp communicating with the homeowners who share the property line. His response was "they are not the government and they don't has'¢ my telephone to contact me to let me know what was going on" and laid the responsibility on the City of Chula Vista by stating they depend on the City of Chula Vista to let residents know. Mr. Teichner stated this project located at 752 and 754 was discussed at the Public meetings which leads me to believe it is part of Sharp Master Project and not an independent project. Mr. Velez said he was aware letters were mailed to residents and I showed him the copies I had that only discuss the project at 751, the letters did not mention any projects at 752 and 754 or I would have attended the meetings. (attached for your review). The residents from Caminito Valiente did not have an opportunity to voice their opinions due to the fact, they were not aware of any project so close to their shared property line that would have a long term impact. Mr. Matt Teichner stated, I will be separated by a 6ft wall, and the noise of the cars will be no more than the front of my home and travelling 25 miles per hour. My response some people and some vehicles are taller than 6ft. Privacy issues, security, vehicle emissions, and noise immediately came to mind. I am not comfortable letting my 15 months old grandchild who lives in my home play outdoors in the patio knowing vehicles will be driving on the other side of the patio wall. I asked both Mr. Velez and Mr. Teichner if they could not have cars go through this tight area and rather route them in and out to the parking lots from Medical Center Road. They gave me reasons I do not understand why it is not possible including electrical and water. I disagreed as I feel it is possible. There is no point at this time for me to go fuRher into a "they said, she said" scenario. I am a homeowner and do not have a team on experts on every topic or subject related to these projects. I clearly see and understand the larger picture on how this expansion of parking supports the community and was willing to work through the inconvenience of the trucks, bobcats until completion of the surface parking lots thinking it was short term and not long term. I feel let down by all parties involved. I feel this issue was worked around by not fully disclosing the addresses of the projects and allowing residents a voice. It should not have taken so much of my time and energy to get a clear answer on my question. I feel the information I received from both parties that this was a "grading permit" and that does not need residents to be informed was not fully disclosing the long term impact of the project on homeowners. I am very disappointed my constant communication and request for an answer on one question the road/driveway issue was not answered until late last night. Had staff or the team from Sharp answered the question last night at the City Council meeting, I would have had an oppoRunity to ask the members of City Council to request Sharp submit a I Change Order for the expansion of the surface parking lots located at 752 and 754 Medical Center Road and eliminate the driveway behind my patio wali. I do not know if the members of City Counal were aware cars would be driving between the extended parking lots of 752 and 754 Medical Center Road or the long term impact this would have on homeowners of Caminito Valiente. From the email from Mr. Bautista, it appears they may not. The impact or inconvenience to homeowners of this project is not as described — a shoR term project related inconvenience. In reality it is a short term construction inconvenience with a long term impact so close to residential property. I am inviting any member of the City Council to meet me at my property for a site visit. I respectfully request the members of City Council review the drawing I handed out at the meeting and the attachments I have included with this letter. I feel you will have a great understanding of my concerns and why I came to the meeting to seek yo�rhelp. Sylvia McKinney Attachments: Copies of the letters to the public Copies of the two photographs I brought to the meeting Copy of email from Mr. Bautista I �� NOT[CE OF NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING \ �-� SHARP HOSPTIAL PARKING STUCTURE � ' NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE Ciry of Chula Vista Development Sen-ices Department is holdina a neiehborhood meetina concerning the proposed Sharp Hospital Parkin� Swcture on Thursday,January 30.201�at 6:00 p.m. at Hedenkamp Elementary School Multi-Purpose Room.The purpose of this nei�hborhood meeting is [or the applicant to obtain your input regardins the proposed project's desion, and listen to concems regardino potential neiehborhood impacts. No formai decision regarding the project will be made at this meetina. PUBLIC �IEETING D.�TElI'Iil•IE: JANUARY 30, 2014 6:00 P.�I. �LEETING LOCATION/ADDRESS: HEDE\I�1�•IP ELEMENTARY SCHOOL �IULTI-PURPOSE ROO��I — - - - - - - - --- -- -- -- - --- 930 EAST PALO�IAR STREET TO DISCtiSS THE FOLLO«'ING PRO.TECT: PROJECT: SHARP HOSPTI.AL PARI�ING STRliCTURE CaSE \`li�•IBERS: DRC-13-31/PCC13-04�/PCDI 13-22 �1PPLIC�\T: SH:1RP CHULA �'ISTA ��IEDICAL CE\TER SITE �1DDRESS: 751 ilIEDICAL CE\TER COURT PROJECT DESCRIPTIO\`: A proposed sis-story(seven le��els)parking structure[o replace an existing surface parking lot located in the center of the hospital campus.A new loop road will connect the parking structure and hospi[al with�tedical Center Court and t«o access points. �tafi and tne appiicant will present tne proposed projec[ a[ [he meetiiie ana wouia iike to rece�ve input irom the surroundin� residents. Please contact Project Manager Jeff Steichen at (619) 58�-�778 for any questions. . c� � 1� �� Lr�j � S�f�l � NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION of the City of Chula Vista, CA, has received a application for a Precise Plan as follows: CONSIDERATION DATE: March 12, 2014 � � LOCATIONlTIME: 276 Fourth Ave, Chula Vista/6:00 p.m. Q� CASE NUMBER: PCM 13-22 G�� - J�, APPLICANT: Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center �� • �� ^ SITE ADDRESS: 751 Medical Center Court/South side of Telegraph Canyon Road, East of Medical Center Drive and North of Medical Center Court. (APN 641-101-28) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting a Precise Plan to allow a height of 120 feet _ _ _ _ /AC �v..J.�.�...:.....�. ... �� ..�I.. II�...� \ J�� . . ��J 'G• .PnullUl(� Vu��VnuY �I�VVVG�� lV QliliV�I1111tiUPlG Q�UIVF/VJCU Ndirii�y structure to be located at the northern edge of the hospitai campus at 751 Medical Center Court. The Planning Commission wiil aiso be providing feedback regarding related applications'PCC 13-045 and DRC-13-31. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project qualifies for a Class 32 categorical exemption pursuant to Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Project) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Thus, no further environmental review is necessary. Any written comments or petitions to be submitted to the Planning Commission must be received in the Development Services Department, no later than 5 p.m. the day before consideration. Please direct any questions or comments to Project Planner Jeff Steichen (619) 585-5778 in the Development Services Department, Public Services Building, Chula Vista Civic Center, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910, or by calling. Please include the case number noted above in all correspondence. If you wish to challenge the City's action on this application in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised in response to this notice prior to the Planning Commission's action on the application. A copy of the application and the accompanying documentation and plans are on file and available for inspection and review at the City Planning Department. Within ten days after the decision is rendered, the applicant or other interested person may appeal the decision Planning Commission to the City Councii by submitting an appeal form and the required fee to the Development Services Department. Please notify the project planner if you wish to receive a copy of the Planning Commission's decision. COMPLIANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT(ADA) The City of Chula Vista, in complying N•ith [he American With Disabili[ies Ac[, requests individuals who require special accommodation ro access,attend and/or participate in a Ciry meetin„acdvity or service request such accommodation at Izase 48 hours in advance, for meetinos, and 5 days for scheduled sen�ices and activities. Please contact Diana Var�as for specific information at (619) 691-5101. Service for the hearin� impaired is available at (619) 58�-�647 (TDD). �I NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Chula Vista, CA, has received a application for a Precise Plan and Design Review Permit as follows: CONSIDERATION DATE: . April 8, 2014 LOCATIONlfIME: City Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Ave, Chula Vista/2:00 p.m. CASE NUMBER: PCM 13-22/DRC 13-31 APPLICANT: Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center SITE ADDRESS: 751 Medical Center Court/South side of Telegraph Canyon Road, East of Medical Center Drive and North of Medical Center Court. (APN 641-101-28) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting a Precise Plan (PCM 13-22) to ailow a height of 120 feet (45 feet maximum currently allowed) to accommodate a proposed parking structure within the Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center campus at 751 Medical Center Court. A Design Review Permit (DRC 13- 31) is also being requested for the Project. . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project qualifies for a Class 32 categorical exemption pursuant to Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Project) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Thus, no further environmental review is necessary. Any written comments or petitions to be submitted to the City Council must be received in the Development Services Department, no later ihan 5 p.m. the day before consideration. Please direct any questions or comments to Project Planner Jeff Steichen (619) 585-5778 in the Development Services Department, Building B (Public Services Building), Chula Vista Civic Center, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910, or by calling. Please include the case number noted above in all correspondence. If you wish to challenge the City's action on this application in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised in response to this notice prior to the City Council action on the application. A copy of the application and the accompanying documentation and plans are on file and available for inspection and review at the City Planning Department. COMPLIANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT(ADA) The Citq of Chula Vista, in complying with the American With Disabilities Act, requests individuals who require special accommodation to access, attend and/or panicipate in a City meetino,activiry or service request such accommodation at lease 48 hours in advance, for meetinss, and � da}'s for scheduled services and activities. Please contact Pat Lauahlin for specific information at (619}307-3�7�. Sen�ice for[he hearino impaired is availabie at (619) �3�-�G17 (TDD). I Ir .� �� ,f ;w ----- �� '� ,�• � �� • � ,�.�`. ' ��. � ', . �� , � a+ ; �� 'IF� , �hV � �tl • ' . ;;��ta. .�: 'n.+�. ) � ...:,S• — a,,. : ,.g �'�4l' , ' a�• . ��.. 1 /�" ��.�5�� ` . 16�� '' y� � „ .� '' _' ' _ '� e.,„�-�„' 1�.. ...�-_._—"L,.!?l�r...-.� �� R��t o �"...;'�y'�_'„• .,_4' �%',-._'r` ,��-, � .a„�y,..,s,..,.1�,`6 :,�_! . _ '. '�^,�� '.*w:^�';?�"t'�a , y_,-. .. i � �t. �l , �o_��s�a��'' . .(^_ +(� " Y �. ' ' rri�._. `-�—"••"=J l— `Y• — `\' P �� U��itn ,yl� ' v�r_''^Lr� �_ . ,� .� . � � _� ^ �.f� �� ' _ - '��.�q ll��t�w:.'.Y'` '�� , ^ '�v '�v � - �� r5i(��s✓y4— .M� ' C � �� • � _� � ��+t�.' " ' �f. �," �� R..✓' . �rZ•c � .. � ; ' y;- � - . � °�� -a` ..._ °.,� � 'ti-�' ;.:;' - .:v .,✓> ' :4�', � :,.i _„i,_„ ,.. , , �.f'. . y "- ' . . �, , ` a,� ' . . .i" � {�' *'' . ^ ., r .�., �, , , -� r�,,.,,,,,� { . r�',��.^�� .�4�\\•,y,,, c i k i�. , ! . 9/i ., '� `L ' �r.� � � '/k'_�"� ^r.lyr '- '. ''• . � � • . .. � �ir'�y.�, »' � �" •. � J, ' .. � . �,� , "�L t «..,. . � � ' . ° .i! ,. I � `� ' � � '� '.�,-,;,t. • •• _ . . � . '/' �._l�,�.rti..e, : F : . . , ; o j y\ � �,.eob o, •� ,; ,a � � , _ * � _� � � � � • '�? . . , • � �� , • � i _ . ; . , . , � , ' ��, . ,._.. ,._— ,R- , ,}'.� . e ^ `• :` x,,"= ,._ -_. , ' , • ... y � :"1�, � ` ', , . .'n e � ,�• �Y- � � -'k�-° �. ;'i �� . -- � �� `�� `�4'=�<, ,';o ��. , i 1;� � � A �; � . ,;-`—_ ,�?. �� , °/ ° c•�� %�;, .< �' ar'�, r , o ' . � � ` � , � ��,. 1..�� ;'`-,n .° � ,. �� ,., ` . , ` �•a-� , P"y. !. f, p �+ ' ' �•i� . �:'kv ox. 1 `` �f�`,Of!'. �'�p� 4� . \ � ��bn't' t e��. y4,�.+ r t =t ' . '� � � �, \ � ° o . b' " o ,pr-. ' T.•r , 3 �•�,,�.,� � _ ',� " .a.�� ,� ' �°°'� � �� ; ,"'� r��'�r ��'�fi i- . `R �. . , , '� � le "'i '..�..� . ��' '„ { � ,y•< ' - x., �,� M f��. r, �;I�ii�` �; .. , ��i ip#_ .,� 1�'�. . . , -,o� • t`•. . � '��["y_� ,o.�. ' K " � f 'a � � t +u b.lb r. 7f� , .' � "�I :.r �t 'E� � ° �h� A��'n� '��. � '��, ' ;',` t;1�, n . r� ,. .r l ry�� I 4J �+ �;� �iY1 �.t 'r .w�'+� .M �� M'� i 1 '�o o . � �i o .t .M;�' . '' � ' ,W. : .'� �. . � . o , . . , h � ,, r � ' ; � .�o �4{,,, D 1O�' �y� �{1� ,1 ' 1�' . . MI�Y' , YKy..." '` M+ 4'0 .y�� 1 �1 �p� " N v. � � �� t e,,�'� a �' \' - � . "'� �`` -'' — - � ! ,! ! . ! _ rt„� r.��,,,� . �.` � '�'�, ' t `t� � �'.��'1! � �: . " � s � ! s•_ '° rti�. � �S !j� ♦V'. YF Mi; ' O ] ' ' • �� ,` ,' `• � �\ > # ' �� • � 0-`�M1' .y, • 1.,� � 1 � I �� 1� �/ y (E ` ♦ .. .` � �� ' �I ''�`•0 _ �.� b} e t'� q'�' - VC`5��1.� '!'1�'F"��` � � — �. •. ' � �; , R ` �a � . x' r�\ , iY�«� � .d ' �.- .�' '_��` p . v,', .x:._ ': y �- / a ' -.�� r i:r �� i d -`�`° _ .� � �t��v e. ,a� �4�� !� �` .� •� ,'s, . � fF � I.. / O��. r' ,',��`- + � i 1 M' . r' �, � "' .� ' . p �t u�.' ., j i. .;��. . r � c �� . -! ' ,�{j1. ..�` n_ ' 1 . i�, 1 I-�i•" ,.,��" , S .� o-_ +•� `� f/�1� � �i d•- r� '.U; _t; 'p .�' S + K g � � � v>-•'�•+�,• �t��, � . � t . , r � ,r. ;:';� . ;(y+ � o � � %�' � o <l�. ` 4. ��..� fr, � �'1 k 1. ' 1 " : < <>�``t`'�._.� �.; � .�'� . � . ��;t�;,,�, � � `� � - ,:. , , )_i...' ia. �,,� f t'u .j ��: , . , '�.•r/."�. i� � %� 9f ``'i':�,.1 E! �'� ! / � 'ulS�•r i i,'�� ( . a d.rN� ° _. � .> " tt r ° �, `• < -_ � .� . ,A, .I + �`'� 'ry ; P�� a Z y �',f� i S;� � .�-v ��,�. � � aY,- r l ...�. �1��{�� <� , `� 1� V' � � �V� VR.�� I y`�'."� �}`�� ) � , � � 1 F �v? � ��'�` c . .` " �. ` �� s rg ''t ,) � : t ' I b t n ~ ;y�C - i� _;�:.� �., Ci. � � � `�} � I �• f � ' -t � 6 n �- ., '.� '_ _ ct -• .�R��F - - � •L ei;i -•it� ' � .A ;� I ;, � _ , �'�r:� '. �. � � l�.t, d�.; i J x • .�.~c�c,�a i,� � 1 :/'CV: I `y" "� I - --� � �=�-�' ------�' • r�a �. � ;�y, �: � . , r ^.*'';��, `R�� h�� :t t� i �'�p�°' �,•�- .�. Y�`f'. �j � ��-�-��-�` ..��`��: '; ..: `�%��.__�y�, r i — � , ��,.. , ...•-:,�: -.r: ' � f - •r �_ ., 'r .� .sb ° .�5�F' ,L , "v, ' : .�w, *�^:4�: : ��'_' r:+.�t .k_'a"'i��. �� g � �. ' ,1 '. r- F . " . . ' , � i L:`� ...J!nff.� �_Z- �!. �" �" .:.'�.� f.� i F/�� ,� .. .tKI= _ _ ' y1 • ! y .ya.' �:< K �H+�, ♦ . 4if(�K F �`�o I,��. rn'i�9(. o � , .�.',�J" ' �' ,�� i '; ' `A��>e 't�.il,� ' ' I ' ,� � ��y�t {'l +YC�� f,�. ..`,�;� f , t� ___.I i 'j�'v' .�c.� yL�t,v ay,• .. �a � 1 ! o� • • r$�� 5<< '�� ♦4• '' 4'��ri,��[) y� � _ _ } ��\�t l~ryry �rl�• 1•�� .F1'.. L��t .'e;fy'p�J' "°r� .� • �, �t �• l ' µ:'r S .�y`•.�:�•l/. ..J�J': c�� .Sf y .i� �v��. ,�T ;s'Fy�:-f' �j,��' ! • i � . Ll�. M�+�7� }i x �j+�.,� .y�. ! ='�1 a +,r.:l. - . C I�`�"Y+i �ll` Fj`.i_`4,= ';,7. - ... y. ,_ <! ,�} j _. "'� _ � �� " ' f/r : -.V• r � h'1 'l�-,�K, ,��, "�a _ p''^Ii,.�,' ' ry - � ri L�: •; � ° ' ' . r a ' +� ,�� 3n' ..z .t•` i . . �=`{ ��I "+ r� .� ' � '. ' �1� �h`' ��'�3F � � . { .`•.�f4i E•. , �� nyi a . � 4 F.. < .L�, '. f�{ �� r�l ^� � � K t�j `� . . J G . , a ' � t y j,1�. Ir4�I , i?'_ e=r - r. �.� , ;' y�:�'i�:lt•H)� �a .! �� ;1�r ( f �':!; . 1/ i� '� �� • ,�" Y. o �'"� , 1 • :� :� .-�4� f� � � - l � . � ` - { `-�`'., �.'=f=%,;; "��r.; , "�'1'�� , . ,�j"�..' s : . • v�' ' �.'.gF � • r.ftr ' ' i' o"Y S'' +y r' F�vd: Sharp Chula Vista Parking Lots - Outlook �Veb Access Lieht Paee 1 of 2 �;.� OFOCP OutlOOk wab Ace:s Type here to search , This Pdder �/ I P; 3�Adaress Book J OO�ons �j Log OH � � ; �? Mail ' Ep ReON=��ReON:o All;[–;j ForwaN '.:�Move' ?(Delete� ��Junk� �Qose� .a <y � �� Fwd: Sharp Chula Vista Parking Lots ; �falendar �� Sylvia Evans-McKinney [ i � '' Fwd: Sharp Chula Vista Parkine Lots - Oudook lVeb Access Li�ht Page ? of 2 On Thu,Apr 3,201�a[5:20 PM,Chester Bauusta<cbautista6-�rhulan5taw vov>wmte: Hi SyMa, 1 Oi0 sentl the plans. i wan[ed ro[oMrtn[hat you got Nem as they are mther large. Let me know if you did or d�d rot receive � Nem. ihanks. Chester Bauhsia.RCE,QSP/QSD � Asaiate Gnl Ergineer � Gty of Chula Vsca � cbaubsb6�chulanstaca.aov . 276 Fourth Avenue Chuta U¢ta,CA 91910 � 619 976-5332 --,L --- ° ° � �, �,��m�� Ihttps://mail.3vcommerce.com/owa/?ae=[tem&t=[P�I.\�ote&id=RgAAAAD1t1H7p%26F0... 4/16/2014 Elizabeth Briggs From: Kerry Bige�ow Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 1220 PM 70: Elizabeth Briggs Cc: Tyshar Turner Subject: FW: MAJOR CONCERN. Sharp hospital parking structure. Liz, Can you please print and include as additional written correspondence on the Sharp item from 4/15 (like the other letter)? Tyshar-- if others come in, can you copy Liz too? Thanks, Kerry -----Original Message----- From:Tyshar Turner On Behalf Of CityClerk Sent: Friday,April 18, 2014 8:18 AM To: Kerry Bigelow;Jeff Steichen Subject: FW: MAJOR CONCERN. Sharp hospital parking structure. FYI �Tyshar -----Original Message----- From: Jecklors [ Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 12:23 AM To: mcox(alchulavistaca.¢ov: Pamela Bensoussan; Rudy Ramirez; Mary Salas; CityClerk Cc beliasolhoa@QmaiLcom Subject: MAIOR CONCERN.Sharp hospital parking structure. Dear Sir/Ma'am, I'm writing to you to voice out my family's concern about the propose extension of Sharp Chula Vista parking lot, in Bella Sol community.Our house is located next to the proposed parking lot. I am a nurse, and i work night shift, and hearing the noise from the construction wili be a great disturbance to my sleep. I had a bad experience already a couple of weeks ago when they were drilling in the proposed project, waking me up in the middle of sleep.This resulted to lack of sleep and may affect my health and also myjob performance.The noise that the construction will make greatly worries me. I proposed that the hospital compensate to the hassle the construction of the parking lot will make not only to my family but also to the whole community. Sincerely yours, Angelica Nunag RN • Chula Vista, CA. 91911 i I Revi Sed 1��1 u-}i on Hem # "1 RESOLUTION RESOLUT101�' OF THE CITY COUI�CIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA \'ISTA GRANTII�'G A DESIGI�' REVIE\�' PERI�4IT (DRC li-31) FOR A PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE ON A SITE LOCATED AT 7�1 A4EDICAL CENTER COURT. I. RECITAL,S A. Project Site �'�'HEREAS; the azea of land that is subject to this Resolution is diaerammaticalh� represented in Exhibit A attached to this Resolution, and commonly l:no�m as Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center campus, located at 751 Medical Center Court (`Project Site').; and B. Project; Application for Discretionarv Appro��als WHEREAS; a duh��erified application��as filed ��ith the Cin� of Chula Vista Development Senices Department on November 26, 2013 b�� Sharp Chula Vista Vtedical Center(SCn4C) ('Applicanr'). (`Onner' and "Developer`) requestine approval of a new pazking structure to be developed on the Project Site (`ProjecP`); and C. Environmental Determination WHEREAS. the De��elopment Services Director has reviewed the proposed project for compliance �iith the California Em�ironmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project qualifies for Class 32 cateQorical exemption pursuant to Section 1�332 (In-Fill Development Project) of the State CEQA Guidelines; and D. City Council Record of Application WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for the hearine on the Project application and notices of said hearinss, toeether �»th its purposes gi��en b�� its publication in a newspaper of eeneral circulation in the cin�, and its mailing to properq� oNmers �ti�ithin �00 feet of the ezterior boundaries of the Project Site at least ten (10) davs prior to the hearine; and WHEREAS. the dulv called and noticed public hearinv on the Project �aas held before the Cirn Council of the Cin� of Chula Vista on April 8, 2014, in the Council Chambers in Ciq� Hall, Chula Vista Ci��ic Center. 276 Fourth A��enue. at 2:00 p.m. to receive the input of the Piannine Commission, and to heaz public testimony �ti�ith regard to the same. I�'ON' THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Cin� Council of the Cin� of Chula Vista herebv Gnds. determines. and resol��es as follo��s: Resolution No. Pase 2 II.� CEQA EYEMPTION FINDINGS That the proposed project complies with the Califomia Environmental Qualin� Act and qualifies for a Class 32 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Article 19; Section 1�332 (In- Fill De��elopment Project) of the State CEQA Guidelines in accordance ��ith the follo��ine Findines: CALIFORI�'IA ENVIROI�'MENTAL QUALITY ACT, CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIOI�'S ARTICLE 19. SEC7�ION 1�332. CLASS 32 CATEGORICr1L E�iEA4PTION (T1�'-FILL DEVELOPMEt�'7) FII�'DIi`'GS: A. THAT THE PROJECT IS CONSISTAI�'T V�'ITH THE APPLICABLE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIO\ AI�'D ALL APPLICABLE GE\'ERAL PLAi\' POLICIES AS �i'ELL AS ��'ITH APPLICABLE ZOI�'II�'G DESIGNATIO\'S AI`'D REGULATIONS. The Chula Vista General Plan desienation for the site is Public and Quasi-Public (PQ). Accordine to General Plan Chapter �, Section 4.9.6 (Page LUT-54), the PQ designation depicts e�isting areas used by schools, churches, and hospitals. Because the site has a General Plan desienation of PQ, the existing medical facility is acl:nowledeed and e�pressly allo«ed in the General Plan. The C-O zone allo��s medical offices and clinics. Hospitals are allo�+�ed on the site, and elsewhere within the Cin�, as an Undassified Use (CVMC 19.�4). The project is allo�ti�ed as an ancillarv use for the medical center; since it ��ill provide park:ing and impro��ed vehiculaz access sen�ing the allowed medical center use. The project indudes the request for a precise plan to allo�� a height that is in excess of the ma�imum alloN�ed heieht of 45 feet for the C-0 Zone. Because the zone in �+�hich the project is located is C-O-P, a precise plan may be applied to the site H�ith City Council approvaL According to CVMC Section 19.�6.040, the requirements specified in the precise plan shall take precedence o��er the othen��ise applicable regulations of the underl��ins zone. In this particulaz case. the applicant is askine to maintain a heieht of 120 feet. ��here 4� feet is othern�ise allo�;�ed. The intent of the precise plan�as described in CVMC Section 19.�6.041; is to allow reeulatory flexibility in instances ��here the site has unique attributes and requires special handling. The site has been utilized as a medical center since the 1970's. The COP zoning desienation ��as applied to the site in 1990; H�hen the zonins �+�as changed from residential (R1H). Because the uses allo��ed in the C-O zone «�ere compatible ��ith the esiting use of the site, the C-O zone �vas chosen as the most appropriate zoning desienation for the site at the time that it N�as rezoned. Because the CO zone has a height requirement of 4� feet ma�imum, fle�ibility in zonine ��as needed at the time that the site ��as rezoned in 1990. since the site maintained Resolution No. Paae 3 structures (hospital to�vers) in escess of 4� feet. The "P ` modifier ��as applied to the site resulting in a C-O-P Zone, acl:no��ledging the special chazacteristics of the site and the need for flesibilin� be��ond the requirements of the C-O zone. Consistent ��ith this intent, the applicant is requesting a precise plan to allo�v a n-pe of facility (pazkine structure) that is normall�� associated N�ith a medical center. B. THAT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OCCURS V�'ITHIN CITY LIMITS OI�' A PROEJCT SITE THAT IS NO MORE THAI�' FNE ACRES SUBSTAt�'TIALLY SURROLTi�'DED BY URBAI�' USES. The site is located within the Chula of Vista cin� limits. The project site; ��hich consists of a parkine structure and loop road; is less than � acres in size. The total project site is approximately 1.� acres. The project is surrounded b��urban uses on all sides. Surrounding uses consist of inedical uses, a veteran's home, and residential de��elopment. C. THAT THE PROJECT SITE HAS NO VALUE AS HABITAT FOR ENDAI�'GERED. RARE OR THREATENED SPECIES. The project site consists of a eraded and developed pad; which includes commercial landscapine that does not include flora nor fauna habitat. ThereFore; the site has no ��alue as habitat for endaneered; rare or threatened species. D. THAT APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT WOULD NOT RESULT 11�' ANY SIGNFICANT EFFECTS RELATII�G TO TRAFFIC; \'OISE, AIR QUALITY, OR �'�'ATER QUALITY. The parking earage does not eenerate additional traffic on the site. All on site traffic can be attributed to esistine traffic generatins uses on the site. such as the hospital and medical offices. As such, the project will not result in am� sienificant effects relating to traffic. Because there �i�ould not be any increase in traffic due to the project; there would also not be any significant ad�erse air qualit�� or noise effects due to the pazking Qazaoe and loop road. The parking gazage and loop road �vill arguabl�� improve any existing air quality or noise effects attributable to the medical facilin-, since omsite circulation ti�ill be impro��ed resultine in less on-site vaffic coneestion. A technical letter prepared b�� LLG Eneineers. dated April ]0: 2014 states that there aze no traffic impacts associated �vith the project; and that the loop road provides good access to the parking structure. A technical letter dated April 10, 2014 prepared b�� Atkins; states that there would be no adverse noise impacts associated �cith the project. The project is required to compl�� ith all City of Chula Vista ��ater qualitv requirements. and a ��'ater Qualih� Technical Report has been prepared for the project. The Wa[er Qualit�� Technical Report; Resolution No. Pa�e 4 � and requuements outlined therein, is in conformance ��ith all standards required by the Ciri�`s Land Development Section. The project ��ill be required to compl}� w�ith all ��ater quality requirements outlined in the \�'ater Quality Technical Report, as �vell as the Cin� of Chula Vista`s Municipal Storm Water Permit; and as such, the project �ti�ill not result in an}� sienificant effects to ��ater qualiri�. E. THAT THE SITE CAI�' BE ADEQUATLEY SERVED BY ALL REQUIRED UTILITIES AND PUBLIC SERVICES. The existina medical center site is currentl}� sen�ed b}� all required public utilities and sen�ices. The parking structure would result in no additional demand for additional public utilities/sen�ices, and will be sen�ed ��ith existing utilities and sen�ices such as electricih�, �vater, and public safet��. IIL DESIGN REVIE�Y FINDINGS/APPROVAL A. THAT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMEI�rT. AS COI�rDITIONED. IS CO\'SISTENT WZTH THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE COP. OFFICE COMMERCIAL WITH PRECISE PLAN OVERLAY ZONE. The proposed project complies ��th all development standards of the COP zone �»th the e�ception of building height which is beine requested to increase from a ma�imum of 45 feet to 120 feet in conjunction with a Precise Plan approval for this Project. B. THE DESIGN FEATURES OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMEI�TT ARE COI�'SISTENT WITH. AI`TD ARE A COST EFFECTNE METHOD OF SATISFYING THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DESIGN GUIDELII�ES AI�'D THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DESIGI�' MAi\TUAL AI�TD LANDSCAPE MANUAL. The project is in compliance with the Commercial Guidelines of Chapter III of the City Design Manual in that it complies �vith the Site Plannine desien guidelines for compatibilit}�, building placement and screenins, It also complies ��ith the Architectural desien euidelines for compatibilit��, scale/building fa�ade and roof articulation and materials and colors. The ne�i� parking garage is strateeicall}� located in the center of the medical center campus to provide additional parkine to the overall campus to support the acute caze facilities; as well as the outpatient facilities. The orientation of the parking structure itself is placed to alien �+�ith the other lazeer scale buildings nearby. The colors and materials are consistent ��ith the adjacent builidines on the medical campus in order to full�� inte�rate it ��ith the hospital. Bufferine and/or screenine to reduce the ��isual impact of the pazkine struciure on the neighborino residential Resolution No. Paee � � areas ��ill be provided primarih� thoueh the use of hea�� landscapin2 to screen the lo��er floors of the parking structure�Desian features have been incorporated that attempi to minimize the massi��eness of the structure, resulting in the visual appeazance being that of n��o sepazate structures. ]n addition, the structure is desi�ned to be 6�% open to the surroundine environment. I IV.� APPROVAL OF DESIGN REVIE��' PEI2A'IIT Based on the findings abo��e, the Cin� Council approves the Design Review Permit, as sho��n in proiect �lans on file in the Office of the Cin� Clerk. subject to the conditions set forth beloH�: A. The following shall be accomplished to the satisfaction of the Ciri�, prior to issuance of building permits, unless otherN�ise specified. Plannine: 1. Prior to, or in conjunction �+�ith the submittal of plans for the building permit; pay all applicable fees, including any unpaid balances of permit processing fees for deposit account DQ-1762. 2. The colors and materials specified on the buildine plans must be consistent �vith the colors and materials shoNm on the site plan and materials board appro��ed by the City Council on April 8, 2014, or as subsequently modified per their direction. 3. All ground mounted utilitv appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc.; shall be located out of public ��ie«� and adequatel}� screened throueh the use of a combination of concrete or masonrv�valls; bermine; and/or landscapine to the satisfaction of the City. 4. A eraffiti resistant treatment shall be specified for first floor and building surfaces. This shall be noted for any building and ��all plans and shall be re��ie�+�ed and appro��ed by the Director of Development Sen�ices prior to the issuance of buildin� permits. Additionall}�, the project shall conform to Section 9.20.0» of the CVMC resazdine graffiti control. �. Prior to issuance of buildine or grading permits, �i�hiche��er occurs first, a photometric study shall be submitted for revie�� and approval by the Director of Development Sen�ices that indicates there shall be no light spillage be}�ond the propem� lines of the project site. Land Development Enaineerin�/L.andscape Architecture Di��ision 6. Applicant shall pa}�the following fees: Resolution No. Paee 6 a. Se��°er Capacity Fees b. Traffic Sienal Fees c. De��elopment Impact Fees per Master Fee Schedule 7. Prior to issuance of buildine pemvts. applicant shall indicate on the site plan an additional side�ti�alk and ADA compliant ramp to connect to the proposed pedestrian ramp to the medical office facilities. 8. Prior to issuance of �rading permits, the submitted eradine plans shall indude the follo��ina: a. Indication as to ho�ti� runoff from the slope will be diverted from the proposed retaining «�all on the north side of the project. b. The rounding of proposed slope ��ith the natural slope in order to avoid any concentrated flo«�. 9. Prior to issuance of grading permits_ applicant shall aeree to the follo��ing: a. That final sizine of the V�'ater Qualin� BMP's shall be determined durine the gradino permit process. b. That all drainage facilities shall be pri��ately maintained. t0. Prior to issuance of grading or buildine permits permit (��hichever occurs first), applicant must submit complete Landscape Improvement Plans for approval to the City of Chula Vista that comply ��ith Chapter 20.12 of the Ciry of Chula Vista Municipal Code, Landscape A4anuaL and Design ManuaL The title sheet of the dra��ines shall contain a signed statement by the landscape azchitect as follo��s: "I am familiaz ��ith and aeree to comply �+ith the requirements of the landscape improvement plans as described in Chapter 20.12 of the City of Chula Vista Municipal Code. I have prepazed these plans in compliance «�ith those reeulations. I certifi� that the plan implements the resulations to provide efficient �vater use.�' The plans must also demonstrate the parkine garase and utiliri� loop road are adequatel}� screened through the use of plantine material. y Buildine: 11. Plans shall compl�� ith Title 24 and 20li Califomia Buildine Code (CBC); Califomia n4echanical Code (CMC). Califomia Plumbing Code (CPC), Califomia Electric Code (CEC); California Green Buildine Standazds Code (CalGreen) and 2008 Califomia Energy Code. Resolution No. Page 7 Fire: 12. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall perform a fire service studv that includes a hydraulic �i-ater flo«� anal��sis. The analysis shall sho�� the actual flow and pressure for all hydrant and and riser stubs. A higher demand or �vorst case scenario should be used in the flo�� anal�-sis to avoid upgrades to the fire sen�ice loop. The Hazen V�'illiams formula shall be used in the determination of these flo��s and pressures. The analysis shall show that the required fire flo«� is a��ailable at the hydrants and that independentl}�the sprinkler demand is available at the most demandins sprinkler riser. B. The follo«ine on-goine conditions shall apph� to the propem as lone as it relies on this appro��aL 13. This permit shall become ��oid and ineffective if not used or extended bv April 1, 2017, in accordance „�ith Section 19.14.600 of the Municipal Code. 14. All landscape and hardscape improvements shall be installed and maintained in accordance �i�ith the approved landscape plan. 1�. Approval of this request shall not �vai��e compliance n�ith all sections of Title 19 of the Municipal Code, and other applicable City Ordinances in effect at the time of buildine permit issuance. 16. The Propem� O«�ner and Applicant shall and do agree to indemnifi-. protect, defend and hold harmless Cit��, its Cit�� Council members, officers; employees and representatives, from and aeainst am- and all liabilities; losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorne��'s fees (collectively, liabilities) incurred by the Ciro arisin�. directly or indirectly. from (a) Cin�'s appro��al and issuance of this Desien Revie�i� Permit and (b) City s approval or issuance of any other permit or action, whether discretionary or non-discretionan�, in connection �;�ith the use contemplated on the Project Site. The Property O��mer and Applicant shall acl:no�vledse their agreement to this provision by ezecutine a cop�� of this Design Revie�v Permit ��here indicated belo��. The Propem- O«mers and Applicant`s compliance with this pro��ision shall be bindine on any and all of the Propem� O��mer's and Applicant's successors and assiens. This condition may be modified by the Zoning Administrator subject to input from the Cih� Attome}�. Prior to the issuance of any permits required by the Cit}� of Chula Vista for the use of the subject propem� in reliance upon this appro��al, the Applicant/Representative and propem o�i�ner shall e�ecute this document b}� mal;ine a true copy of this resolution and siening both this original letter and the true copy on the lines provided belo��; said esecution indicatins that the Applicant/Representative and Propem� O��roer have each read; understood and aereed to the conditions contained herein, and ��ill implement the same. Upon execution. the true cop}� ��ith orisinal signatures shall be returned to the Project Resolution No. Paee 8 Manaeer in the De�elopment Services Depanment. Failure to return the signed copy of this document ��ithin thirt�� da��s of the effecti��e date hereof shall indicate the Applicanrs/Representative's or Propem� O��mer`s desire that the project, and the corresponding application for buildine permits and/or a business license; be held in abeyance ti�ithout approval. � Si�nature of Propem� O�+mer Date Signature of Applicant Date I �V. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CO\�ITIONS If any of the foreoing conditions fail to occur; or if they aze, b�� their terms, to be implemented andymaintained over time, and any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained accordins to the their terms. the City shall have the right to revoke or modifi� all approvals herein �anted. deny or fiuther condition issuance of futwe building permits, dem�, revoke or further condition all cenificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted, instimted and prosecute litieate or compel their compliance or seek damaees for their violations. No ��ested ri2hts are gained b�� Applicant or successor in inrerest by the Ciri approval of this Resolution. I VI. INVALIDITI'; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION It is the intention of the Ciri� Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon enforceabiliri� of each and everv term pro��ision and condition herein stated; and that in the event that any one or more terms; provisions or conditions aze determined by the Court of competent jurisdiction to be in��alid, illeeal or unenforceable, if the ciry so determines in its sole discretion. this resolution shall be deemed to be re��oked and no further in force or in effect ab initio. Presented b}� Appro��ed as to form by Kellv Brouehton Glen R. Goo�ins Director of Development Sen�ices Cin� Attome�� Resolution No. Paee 9 � I I I C i Veterans Homes Proposed Parking Structu re (Approximate Location) Sharp Chula Vista Medical Medicai Center Offices � �� /�9 ��F tiTF ��T M I Office � Mission � 0 Appartments � �LOCATOR �� i o� � � � �� NORTH r��i 751 Medical Center CL EXHIBIT "A" i_____: 5a�-0�o-zs Resolution PCM-13-22