HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013/12/17 Item 08 � --,�
__ _,....� -;-�-� CITY COUNCIL
__.�. . .
.
� � -��u. � AGENDA STATEMENT
__,,.- <�,
. ,'" �.9�31,� \��l/
� '�"CH U�IA VISfA
DECEMBER 17. 20li. Item g
ITEM TITLE: REPORT REGARDING THE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT
FEE; PARK ACQUISITIO\T :1ND DEVELOP�4ENT FEE,
AI�ID TRiJNIC SE�VER CAPITAL RESERVE FUITDS FOR
THE FISCAL YEAR E\TDED JUNE 30, 2013
SUBA�IITTED BP: DEVELOPD4ENT SERVICES DIRECTOR .
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE/TREASi_JRE �
DIRECTOR OF PUB WORKS
REVIE�VED BY: CITY MANAGE
ASSISTANT CIT I��u\TAGER��
4/STHS VOTE: YES � NO �✓
SU1��4ARY
State Government Code Section 66000 requues local asencies assessing Development
Impact Fees (DIF) and se���er capacity charees to make available specified.fmancial data to
the public each fiscal year. These_reports satisfy that requirement and ha��e been available in
the City Clerk`s office for public review since December �; 2013. An equivalent report for
Parkland Acquisition and Development (PAD) fees is included in this report for ease of
reference and convenience to the public.
Local a�encies aze also required to make findines every five }eazs for any DIF funds
remainin2 unexpended that identify the purpose of ihe fee and demonstrate a reasonable
relationship behveen the fee and the purpose for �tihich it «as chazaed. In the 2012 report,
the City identified unexpended funds that �rere on deposit for five or more yeazs and elected
to make the required findings. I�TO findings aze required this year.
ENVIRONNIENTAL REVIEW
The Development Sen�ices Director has revie�ved the proposed activity, filing of an
annual repoR regarding the De��elopment Impact Fee, Park Acquisition and Development
Fee, and Trunl: Sewer Capital Reserve funds for the fiscal yeaz ended June 30, 2013 for
compliance «�ith the Califomia Em�ironmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined
that the activity is not a "Projecr� as defined under Section 1�.i78 of the State CEQA
Guidelines because it �vill not result in a physical change to the environment; therefore,
8-1
DECEMBER 17. 2013. Item Q
Pa�e 2 of 7
pursuant to Section 1�060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the actions proposed are
not subject to CEQA.
RECOMMENDATION
Council accept the report.
BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Not applicable.
DISCUSSION
The City of Chula Vista collects several types of Development Impact Fees (DIFs),
Parkland Acquisition and Development fees, and Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve fees,
�vhich were assessed during the fiscal year ending June 30, 20li. The major categories
of facilities financed via DIFs include transportation, traffic signals, pedestrian bridges,
drainage, sewer and public facilities.
Development impact fees are updated in two manners, either via a comprehensive DLF
program revie�v or via Council-enacted automatic annual adjustment; based upon an
appropriate indes. On July 1, 2012, the Western Transportation Development Impact Fee
(WTDIF) increased from $3,408 to $3,476 per equivalent dwelling unit. In October of
2012,the following automatic index-based annual adjustments went into effect:
• The Transportation Development Impact Fee (TD1F) increased from $12,198 to
$12,480 per equivalent d�velling unit.
e The Public Facilities Development Impact Fee (PFDIF) increased from $9,370 to
$9,510 per single-family dwelling unit.
• The Traffic Signal fee increased from $32.27 to $33.45 per average daily vehicle
trip.
• The Otay Ranch Village 11 Pedestrian Bridge D1F increased fi�om $2,190 to $2,241
per single-family dwelling unit.
• The Parkland Acquisition and Development fee increased from $9,848 to $9,978 per
single-family dwelling wut for azeas west of I-805 and from $17,530 to $17,660 for
areas east of I-805.
Other fees addressed in tlus report remain at the same rate as the previous fiscal year.
DEVELOPD4ENT IMPACT FEES
Transportation Development Imoact Fee (TDIF)
This fee was adopted on January 12, 1988 via Ordinance 2251 to finance and coordinate
the construction of new transportation facilities so that new streets are built when needed
to serve ne�v development. This fee is applicable to all ne��� development east of
Interstate 80�. Prior to the program, streets were built by developers in a fragmented
fashion, with 6-lane facilities necking do��n to 2-lanes and espanding back to 6-lanes
again. In addition, there ���as a faimess issue, as some developers fronted on large streets
and others did not Now, all developers in the eastern portion of Chula Vista pay the
same fee per dwelling unit, and either the City constructs the street or a developer does.
8-2
�
.
DECEI��IBER ]7. 2013. Item �
Paee 3 of 7
If the developer constructs the street they recei��e a TDIF fee credit �ihen they apply for a
buildine permit.
The TDIF program w�as last comprehensivelv updated in 200�; increasing the fee per
EDU to $10;0�0. This fee is subject to an annual index based adjustment; in October
2012 the fee increased from $12,198 to �12,480 per equivalent d��elline unit (EDU). The
fees for all land use types; as �vell as detailed FY 2012-13 financial information aze
presented in Attachment A, Schedule 1.
W estem Transoortation Development Impact Fee (WTDIF)
This fee �vas adopted on Mazch 18, 2008 via Ordinances 3106 to 3110 to finance and
coordinate the construction of ne�i�transportation facilities on the west-side of the City; as
�iell as to spread the costs associated „�th the construction of the facilities equitabl}�
amona the developin� properties �i�ithin the benefit area. This fee is applicable to all
de��elopment ���est of Interstate 80�. Ttus fee is subject to an annual index-based
adjustment on July 1 of each yeaz; in July 2012 the fee increased from S3,408 to �i,476
per EDU. The fees for all land use t��pes, as �i�ell as detailed FY 2012-li financial
information are presented in Attachment A, Schedule 2.
Tr�c Sienal Fee
This fee �vas adopted to finance and facilitate construction of traffic si�al improvements
required to mitieate increases in traffic volume caused by new development. As funds
aze accumulated they aze expended on traffic signal projects. This cirn��ide fee is
assessed per aeerage daily trip generated. This fee is subject to an amival index based
adjustment; in October 2012 the fee increased from �32.57 to $33.4� per trip. Detailed
FY 2012-13 financial information is presented in Attachment A; Schedule 3.
Teleeraph Can��on Drainase Develonment Impact Fee '
This fee �i�as adopted to finance and facilitate construction of drainaQe improvements
servine the Tele�raph Canyon Drainaee Basin and has remained at �4,�79 per acre since
1988. y Detailed FY 2012-13 financial information are presented in Attachment A,
Schedule 4.
Teleeraph Cam�on Gravih� Se��er Development Impact Fee
This fee was adopted to finance and facilitate espansion of the trunk se��er serving
Teleeraph Canyon Sewer Basin tributary properties. The fee has remained unchaneed at
S216S0 per EDU since 1998. The fees for all land use types, as well as detailed FY
2012-13 financial information is presented in Attachment A, Schedule �.
Poe�i Cam�on Sewer Basin Development Impact Fee
This fee was adopted to finance and facilitate construction of the Poeei Canyon Trunk
Se«er, servine properties �vithin the benefit azea. This fee is applicable to the Poegi
Can}=on Basin. The fee «<as established at S400 per EDU in 1997. In June 2009, the
Pogei Canyon Se���er DIF was updated and the fee «�as reduced to �26� per EDU. The
8-3
DECEMBER 17; 2013, Item �
Page 4 of 7
fee remains unchanged since the 2009 action. The fees for all land use t}�pes, as well as
detailed FY 2012-]3 financial information are presented in Attachment A, Schedule 5.
Salt Creek Sewer Basin Development Impact Fee
This fee was adopted to finance and facilitate construction of the Salt Creek Trunk
Se���er, serving properties �vithin the benefit area. This fee is applicable to tl�e Salt Creek
Se«�er Basin, a portion of the Upper Otay Lake Basin north of the Salt Creek Se�ver
Basin, Wolf Canyon Basin, and a portion of the Lower Otay Lake Basin east of the Salt
Creek Se�ver Basin. In August 2004, the Salt Creek Sewer Basin DIF was updated,
increasing from $284 to $1,330 per EDU, via Ordinance 2974-A. The fee remains
unchanged since the 2004 action. The fees for all land use types, as well as detailed FY
2012-]3 financial information are presented in Attaclunent A, Schedule 5.
Otav Ranch Viilaee 1 2. 5. & 6 Pedestrian Bridae Development Impact Fee
This fee was adopted to finance and facilitate construction of pedestrian bridge facilities
that will serve the subject villages. The fee program was last modified in February 2007,
�vhen it was amended to include Otay Ranch Village 2. This action amended both the
program's area of benefit and facility list. Construction costs were revised and a ne�v fee
of $1,114 per EDU was established and remains unchanged. Detailed FY 2012-13
iinancial infonnation is presented in Attaclvnent A, Schedule 6.
Otav Ranch Villaee 11 Pedestrian Bridee Develonment Impact Fee
"Chis fee was adopted to finance and facilitate construction of four pedestrian bridges in
Otay Ranch Village 11. This fee is subject to an annual indes based adjustment; in
October 2012 the fee increased from $2,190 to $2,241 per single-family d�velling unit.
"Che fees for all land use types, as well as detailed FY 2012-13 financial infonnation are
presented in Attachment A, Schedule 6.
Public Facilities Development Impact Fee (PFDIF)
The Public Facilities DIF �vas adopted to finance and facilitate construction of public
facilities necessary to serve new development. The fee includes sis components. All
components are subject to an annual index based-adjustment; in October 2012 the
combived fee increased from $9,370 to $9,510 per single family d�velling unit. Detailed
FY 2012-13 financial information is presented in Attachment A, Schedule 7. The
components of the PFDIF, including current fees are as follows:
Administration ($596) — Administration of the PFDIF program, oversight of
expenditures and revenues collected, preparation of updates, calculation of costs;
etc.
Civic Ce�ter Expansion ($2,708) — Espansion of the Civic Center per the 1989
Civic Center Master Plan to provide sufficient building space and parking needed
to serve new development. The Civic Center Master Plan was updated in July
2001 to include impacts of Otay Ranch development. Project phases included the
remodel and expansion of City Hall, remodel of the Public Services Building and
8-4
DECED�BER 17. 2013. Item �'
Pa¢e � of 7
remodel of the former Police Facilim, Community Development and Leeislative
Buildinss. Includes associated capital expenses.
Police Facility (51,656) — Improvements per the Civic Center i�4aster Plan to
pro�ide sufficient building space and associated facilities needed to serve new
development. Improvements include construction of a ne�;� policv facility,
upgrading the communications center and installation of ne�v communication
consoles. Also includes the purchase and installation of a computer-aided
dispatch system (CAD), Police Records A4anagement Svstem; Mobile Data
Terminals, and police vehicles.
Corporation Yard Relocation (5��6) — Relocation of the Cin�'s Public �'��orks
Center from the Bayfront azea to the more centrally located site on Ma�«<ell
Road. Also includes the purchase of new vehicles duectly attributable to new
development and the need to maintain an expanding infrastructure network.
Libraries (S1,���)—Improvements include construction of the South Chula Vista
Library and eastern territories libraries and installation of a ne�i� automated librarv
s}�stem. This component is based on the facility needs identified in the Librarv
1�4aster Plan. This fee is applicable to ne�v residential development only.
Fire Suppression System (51,369) — Projects include the relocation of Fue
Stations 3 and 4, construction of a fire training tower and classroom; purchase of a
brush ria; installation of a radio communications to«�er and construction of
various fire stations in the Eastem section of the City. This fee reflects the nine-
station net�vork called for in the 1999 Fire Station Master Plan. Also i�cludes the
purchase of fire apparatus for new stations; as required to serve new development.
Alajor Recreatioo Facilities (S1,180) — Component added in \'ovember 2002 to
build major recreation facilities required to serve ne��� development such as
community centers; gymnasiums, swimming pools, and senior/teen centers. This
fee is applicable to new residential development only.
Although the majority of the public facility project costs aze bome by ne�v development;
it is important to note that various components, or specific projects �vithin a component;
contain both a Cin� and new development cost shaze. The Cit} shaze ofren reflects "joint
unpetus' projects; �vhich aze necessitated by ero«�th and non-orowth factors and/or the
Cit}�'s obligation to correct pre-existing space/equipment deficiencies. The PFDIF fees
only relate to new development's cost shaze for each component.
Parldand Acquisition and De��elopment (PAD) Fees
This in-lieu fee was adopted by the City to acquire neighborhood and community
parkland and to construct pazks and recreational facilities. The acquisition component of
the fee is set at 512,676 for areas east of I-80� and 54,994 for areas �i�est of I-80�, per
sinele family d�velline unit. The development component of the fee is applicable
cit}�uide and is subject to an annual indes based-adjustment; in October 2012 the
de�elopment component increased from �4;8�4 to �4,984 per sinale familv d�+�elling unit.
8-5
DECEMBER 17. 2013, hem g
Page 6 of 7
This action increased the combined fee from $17,530 to $17,660 and from $9;848 to
$9,878; for areas east and west of I-805, respectively. This fee is applicable to new
residential development only. The fees for all residential land use types, as well as
detailed FY 2012-13 financial information are presented in Attac}unent B.
Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve Fees
This fee was established to finance all or a portion of the cost to enlarge se«�er facilities
to eiil�ance efficiency of utilization and/or adequacy of sewer capacity. Detailed FY
2012-13 financial information is presented in Attachment C.
FY 2012-13 Financial Information
Attachment A, Schedules 1 through 6, reports the required financial infonnation for all
DIFs except the Public Facilities DIF. Attachments A, Schedule 7 reports the required
financial infonnation for the Public Facilities DIF and its components. Attachment B
reporis the required financial information for the Park Acquisition and Development fees.
Attadmient C reports the required infonnation for the Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve fees.
The schedules contain the following items:
• Beginning balance as of July 1, 2012.
• Fees received during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013.
o Other miscellaneous revenues received during the fiscal year ended June 30,
2013.
• Interest earned from investing the cash balances available in each fund during the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2013.
• Espenditures from each of the funds during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013.
e A description of each capital project with expenditures funded entirely or in part
by DIF/PAD/Trunk Sewer funds in FY 2012-13 and the percentage of the project
funded b}� this fee through FY 2012-13. More detailed information on all projects
is available in the annual Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget.
• Information on any loans from DIF/PAD/Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve funds
during FY 2012-13.
• Endin� balances as of June 30, 2013 for each fund.
• The amount, description, and purpose of each fee.
• Tdentification of an approximate date by �vhich the construction of public
improvements �vill commence.
The ending balances as of June 30, 2013 are in the process of being audited as part of the
audit of citywide financial statements, and are therefore subject to adjustment.
Findings Required for Funds in Possession Over 5 Years
Gove�nment code Section 66001(d) requires the local agency to make findings �vith
respect to any portion of development impact fees remaining unexpended for the fifrh
year following the first deposit into the account or fund, and every five years thereafter.
The City reviewed all funds and inade the required findings as appropriate in 2012. The
DIF funds ���ill next be revie�ved, and additional findings made if appropriate, in 2017.
8-6
DECEMBER 17. 2013. Item `�
Paee 7 of 7
Copies of this report ���ere sent to the Building Industry Association of San Diego and
real estate de�-elopers.
DECISION D�AKER CONFLICT
Staff has detemuned that the action contemplated by this item is ministerial; secretarial.
manual, or clerical in nature and; as such. does not require the City Council members to
make or participate in mal:ine a eovemmental decision, pursuant to Califomia Code of
Rewlations Title 2, section 18702.4(a). Consequently this item does not present a
conflict under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.). Staff is not
independentlti� a«are, and has not been informed bti� any City Council member, of an}�
other fact that mav constitute a basis for a decision mal:er conflict of interest in this
matter.
CURRENT YEr1R FISCAL IMPACT
This is an informational report and there is no fiscal impact associated �ti�ith accepting or
rejecting this repon.
O\'GOING £ISCAL IA�IPACT
This is an informational report and there is no onQoing fiscal impact associated�iith
accepting or rejecting this report.
ATTACHA�\I'S
A. Schedules 1 through 7: FY 2012-13 Financial Information for all DIFs, includine
Public Facilities DIF
B. FY 2012-13 Financial Information for PAD Fees
C. FY 2012-li Financial Information for Trunk Se«�er Capital Reserve Fees
Prepared by: Phillip Dm�is, .4ssistant Direetor, Finance Department �
8—�
ATTACHMENT A
SCHEDULEI
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES (TDIF)
FY 12/13 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
� Description of Fee: To finance the construction of tra�c and transportation improvements in support of future development.
Amount of the Fee: $ 12,480 per single family equivalent dwelling unit detached
$ 9,984 per single family equivalent dwelling unit attached (med density)
$ 7,488 per multi-family equivalent dwelling unit
$ 199,680 per general commercial gross acre
$ 99,848 per industrial gross acre
FY 12/13 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION: �
FUND 591
po TRANSPORTATION DIF
I
OD Beginning Balance, 07/01/12 $ 24,837,924
TDIF Fees Collected 2,460,000
Transportation State Share -
Interest Earned (78,637)
Miscellaneous Revenues 71,902
Forgiveness of debt -
Transfer-In -
Expenditures:
Supplies&Services -
City StaR Services (182,819)
SR-125 DIF Refunds (2007-182) -
Debt Payment-Calease Fiscal Sys -
Transfer-Out-2003 Refunding COP -
CIP Project Expenditures (2,635,057)
Unaudited Ending Balance, 06/30/13 $ 24,473,313
ATTACHMENT A
SCHEDULE 1.1
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES (TDIF)
FY 12/13 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
FY 12173 CIP E%PENDITURES:
PROJECT Total Appropriation °/a Of Project Future Inilially
PROJECT DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES as o(6/30113 Funded by TDIF Appropriations Scheduled
OP206 Automation-AutoCAD Upgrade $ 3,450 50,000 40.00% - 2010
OP208 CIP Mngmnt& Equipment Purchase 3,300 75,000 36.40% - 2009
OP220 Global Posilioning Virtual Refrn Station - 17,500 70.00% - 2011
STL261 Willow Sl Bridge Widening 1,254,645 2,366,755 5320% - 1999
STL384 Willow Street Bridge Utility Relocalion 51,841 154,937 13.00% - 2012
STM331 98 E. Orange Extension 7,122 3,959,904 100.00% - 1999
OD STM355 Otay Lakes Road Widening, East H to Canyon 674,692 6,910,000 100.00% 810,000 2003
co STM357 Rock Mtn Rd-Heritage to La Media 482 232,000 100.00% 100,000 2004
STM359 Rock Mtn Rd-SR125 Overpass 51,461 300,000 100.00% - 2010
STM364 Heritage Road Bridge Reconstrc 478,825 2,774,510 52.40% - 2007
STM374 Heritage Road-Olympic lo Main 4,810 150,000 100.00% - 2012
STM375 SR125 at San Miguel Ranch- 1/2 Interchange 978 172,869 100.00% - 2012
TF274 TraKc Count Stations 5 420,000 87.50% - 2002
TF325 Transportation Planning Program 10,831 420,000 54.80% - 2007
TF355 1805 Corridor Imprv.Arterial Ops 17,291 50,000 66.70°/a - 2010
TF357 SR125 Corridor and Arterial Ops 20,566 50,000 100.00°/a - 2007
TF364 TDIF(Trans Dev Impact Fund) Update 24,379 255,000 100.00% - 2007
TF379 Traffic Mgmt Center-Traffic Monitoring System 30,379 450,000 100.00% - 2012
TOTAL CIP EXPENDITURES $ 2,635,057
ATTACHMENTA
SCHEDULE 1.2
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES (TDIF)
FY 12/13 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
Descriotion of Loan Outslanding Interest Rate
Loan Amount
Advance to Western Transportation DIF
approved via Council approved FY09 budget $ 36,850 2.140%
Advance to PFDIF (General Administration)
approved by Council Resolution#2008300
on December 16, 2008 $ 5,403,075 3.80%
Advance to PFDIF (General Administration)
approved by Council Resolution";#2009-137
on June 9, 2009 ''��- $ 5,300,000 0.56%
2;,
�
I
0
ATTACHMENT A
SCHEDULE2 �
WESTERN TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES (TDIF)
FY 12/13 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
Description of Fee: To finance the construction of traffic and transportation improvements in support of future development.
Amount of the Fee: $ 3,476 per single family equivalent dwelling unit detached
$ 2,781 per single family equivalent dwelling unit attached (med density)
$ 2,086 per multi-family equivalent dwelling unit
$ 69,523 per regional commercial gross acre
$ 208,570 per high rise office gross acre
FY 12/13 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION:
FUND 593
WESTERN TRANSPORTATION DIF
�
� Beginning Balance, 07/01/12 $ 63,444
J
J
WTDIF Fees Collected 67,830
Interest Earned (649)
Transfer-In -
Expenditures:
Supplies & Services -
City Staff Services -
Transfer-Out-TDIF -
CIP Project Expenditures -
Unaudiled Ending Balance, 06/30/13 $ 130,625
FY 12/13 CIP EXPENDITURES:
PROJECT Total Appropriation % Of Project Future Initially
PROJECT DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES as of 6/30/13 Funded by TDIF Appropriations Scheduled
STL349 UC Bike Path/Ped Accss Std 3rd $ - 55,000 25.60% - 2009
TF363 Western TDIF Bayfront Update - 24,999 100.00% - 2009
TOTAL CIP EXPENDITURES $ -
ATTACHMENT A
SCHEDULE3
TRAFFIC SIGNAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
FY 12/73 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
Description of Fee: For City's traffic signal needs resulting from increased traffic volume caused by new development.
Amount of the Fee: $ 33.45 per trip
FY 11/12 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION:
FUND 225
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
FUND
Beginning Balance, 07/01/12 $ 2,652,226
� Traffc Signal Fees Collected 240,397
� Federal Grant -
N Interest Earned (13,937)
Miscellaneous Revenues 24,945
Transfer-In -
Expenditures:
City Staff Services (1,960)
Other Refunds -
Transfer-Out-2003 Refunding COP -
CIP Project Expenditures (946,457)
Unaudited Ending Balance, 06/30/13 $ 1,955,213 �
ATTACHMENT A
SCHEDULE 3.1
TRAFFIC SIGNAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
FY 12/13 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES '
FY 12/13 CIP EXPENDITURES:
PROJECT Total Appropriation '/o Of Project Fundec Future Initially
PROJECT DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES as of 6/30/13 by Traffic Signal DIF Appropriations Scheduled
OP206 Surevey Monument Preservation Replacement $ - 13,000 8.20% - 2010
OP208 CIP Mngmnt& Equipment Purchase - 40,000 19.40% - 2009
STL362 Third Avenue Streetscape Improvement 345,473 400,000 7.40% - 2013
0o STM370 North Fourth Avenue Widening - 30,000 9.10% - 2011
� TF300 Traffic Signal Instl Hilltop/Oxford 191,176 239,141 100.00% - 2003
w TF316 Signal Installation-2nd & Quintard - 35,911 13.80% - 2005
TF320 Signal Instl Greensgate/Greenvw - 157,174 100.00% - 2008
TF330 Traffic Modification 4th/ Main & 4th/Beyer - 600,930 71.50% - 2006
TF331 Traffic Modification 3rd/Montgomery - 319,001 51.70% - 2006
TF335 Traffic Signal Installation Brandywine 8 Sequoia - 309,201 100.00% - 2007
TF337 Tra�c Left Turn Modifcalion Program 14,140 226,649 100.00% - 2006
TF348 Accesible Pedestrian Signal Facility Upgrade 173 121,675 63.00% - 2008
TF349 Traffic Signal Modification 1 st Ave. E St. Interseclion 48,266 599,928 100.00% - 2008
TF354 Traffic Congestion Relief Program 10,036 55,000 18.00% - 2008
TF355 1805 Corridor Improvement Arterial Ops 139 25,000 ; 33.30% - 2008
TF360 Hwy Safety Imprv Prog Mjr Intr 19,651 702,090 43.80% - 2009
TF366 Trafc Sgnl & Sllight Upgrd/Mtn 2,576 255,913 34.50% - 2009
TF370 Traffic Signal Instal Albany&Orange 179,660 215,778 100.00% - 2010
TF371 Traffic Modification Hilltop Dr& Main Street 79,852 250,000 100.00% - 2010
TF374 Mod Traffc Signal/Equip. 3rd&I and 3rd&K 145 200,000 100.00% - 2011
TF375 Traffic Signal Mod at"F" St. and Fourth Ave. Intersection 31,308 350,000 100.00% - 2013
TF376 Mod Traffic Signal Modification at 3rd&K 23,862 80,000 22.10% - 2011
TOTAL CIP EXPENDITURES $ 946,457
ATTACHMENTA
SCHEDULE4
TELEGRAPH CANYON DRAINAGE DIF (TC DRAINAGE DIF)
FY 12/13 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
Description of Fee For construction of Telegraph Canyon channel between Paseo Ladera and the Eastlake Business Center and for a portion of the channel west of I-805.
Amount of the Fee: $ 4,579 per acre
FY 12/13 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION.
FUND 542
TC DRAINAGE DIF
Beginning Balance, 07/01/12 $ 6,114,387
TC Drainage Fees Collected -
Interest Earned (32,730)
0D Transfer-In -
� Expenditures
J
� Debt Service Payment to 03 Refunding COP -
CIP Pro�ect Expenditures (14,045)
Unaudited Ending Balance, 06/30/13 $ 6,067,612
FY 12113 CIP EXPENDITURES:
PROJECT Total Appropriation %Of Projecl Funded Future Initially
PROJECT DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES as of 6/30/13 by DIF Appropriations Scheduled
DR118 94/Tele Cyn Channl Design $ 1,781 3,919,026 100.00%a - 1994
DR167 Telegraph Canyon Drainage Study Third 8 L 12,103 1,251,000 100.00% - 2006
DR182 Telegraph Canyon Channel Improvement K-1st 161 50,000 100 00% - 2010
DR183 Telegraph Canyon Drainage Study - 1,600,000 100.00% - 2010
TOTAL CIP EXPENDITURES $ 14,045 �
ATTACHMENT A
SCHEDULE5
SEWER DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
FY 12113 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
Telegraph Canyon Gravity Sewer DIF (TC Gravity Sewer DIF) Fund 431
Poggi Canyon Sewer Basin DIF (PC Sewer Basin DIF) Fund 432
Salt Creek Sewer Basin DIF (SC Sewer Basin DIF) Fund 433
Description of Fee: •
' Telegraph Canyon Gravity Sewer DIF: For the expansion of trunk sewer within the basin for tributary properties.
Salt Creek Sewer Basin DIF: For the planning, design, construction and/or financing of the facilities.
Poggi Canyon Sewer Basin DIF: For the construction of a trunk sewer in the Poggi Canyon Sewer Basin from a proposed regional
trunk sewer west of I-805 along Olympic Parkway to the boundary of Eastlake.
�
i
�
�
Amount of the fee:
Fund 431 Fund 432 Fund 433
TC Graviry PC Sewer SC Sewer
Sewer DIF Basin DIF Basin DIF
per single family equivalent dwelling unit detached $ 216.50 $ 265.00 $ 1,330.00
per single family equivalent dwelling unit attached $ 216.50 $ 265.00 $' 1,330.00
per multi-family equivalent dwelling unit $ 162.38 $ 198.75 $ 997.50
Commercial land use $216.50/edu $265/edu $1330/edu
Industrial land use $216.50/edu $265/edu $1330/edu
ATTACHMENT A
SCHEDULE51
SEWER DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
FY 12/13 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
FY 12113 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION:
Fund 431 Fund 432 Fund 433
TC Gravity PC Sewer SC Sewer
Sewer DIF Basin DIF Basin DIF
Beginning Balance, 07/01/12 $ 3,149,199 $ 2,184,383 $ 1,517,553
DIF Fees Collected - 57,529 587,486
°D Interest Earned (5,932) (11,774) (30,909)
� Transfer-In - - -
Expenditures:
City Staff Services - - -
Depreciation Expense- Infrastructure (60,000) - -
Interest Paid - - (62,927)
Transfer Out to Fund 413 - - -
Transfer Debt Service - - (250,000)
CIP Project Expenditures - - -
Unaudited Ending Balance, 06/30/13 $ 3,083,267 $ 2,230,138 $ 1,761,203
ATTACHMENT A
SCHEDULE6
OTAY RANCH PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE
FY 12/13 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
Otay Ranch Village 1, 2, 5 &6 Pedestrian Bridge DIF (OR Vil 1 8, 5 Pedestrian Bridge DIF), Fund 587
Otay Ranch Village 11 Pedestrian Bridge DIF (OR Vil 11 Pedestrian Bridge DIF), Fund 588
Description of Fee:
OR Village 1 8 5 Pedestrian Bridge DIF: To finance the construction of pedestrian bridge improvement between Otay Ranch Villages 1, 5 & 6.
OR Village 11 Pedestrian Bridge DIF: To fnance the construction of pedestrian bridge improvement in Otay Ranch Village 11.
Amount of the fee:
Fund 587 Fund 588
°D OR Village 1, 2, 5 8 6 OR Village 11
I
J Ped Bridge DIF Ped Bridge DIF
per single family equivalent dwelling unit detache $ 1,114 $ 2,241
per multi-family equivalent dwelling unit $ 826 $ 1,665
FY 12/13 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION:
FUND 587 FUND 588
OTAY RANCH DIF OTAY RANCH DIF
Beginning Balance, 07/01/12 $ 374,255 $ 2,954,658
DIF Fees Collected 196,405 55,467
Interest Earned (2,340) (15,872)
Otay Parkway Ped. Bridge (2008-102) - -
City Staff Services - -
Other Refunds - -
Unaudited Ending Balance, 06/30/13 $ 568,320 $ 2,994,253
ATTACHMENTA
SCHEDULE7
PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES(PFDIF)
FY 12/13 STATEMENT OF FUND BALANCE
Descnphon ot Pee antl amount
Atlmistration$596-Administralion of the Public FaciOties DIF pro9ram,overseeing of expentliWres antl revenues collectetl,preparahon of uptlales,calculalion of costs,etc
Crvic Center Expansion$2,708-Expansion of the 1989 Crvic Center per the Civic Center Master Plan to prowtle sufficient builtling space and parking due�o growth antl tlevelopmenL The Crvic
Center Master Plan was updated in July 2001 to indude the Otay Ranch impacts
Police Facility$7,656-Acwmmodation of the bmlding space neetls per the Civic Cenier Master Plan,which inclutled ihe newly wnsimcted police facility,up9radin9 of the commumcahons center
antl installation ol new wmmunication consoles. Also included is the purchase antl installalion of a computer aitletl tlispatch system(CAD), Police Rewrds Management System,antl Mobtle Dala
Terminals.
Corporahon Yard Relocahon$446-Relocahon of the Crty's Public Works Center from the bay Iront area b the more centrally located site on Maxwell RoaO.
Libraries$1,555-Improvements mdude construchon ot the SouM Chula Vista library and Eastem Terntones libraries,and instaliahon ot a new automated hbrary system. This component is based
on the uptlatetl Library Masler Plan
Fire Suppression System$1,369-Pro�ects inclutle Ihe reloca6on of Flre Stahons#3 8#4,consVUChon of a fue training tower antl classroom,purchase of a brush rig,installahon of a retlio
communications tower and wnslrucUOn of various Ore stahons in the Eastem sechon of the City.This(ee also reFlects the updated Fire Sta6on Master Plan,which mcludes needs associated wilh
�he Otay Ranch tlevelopment
� Major Recreation Facilities E1.180—New component adopted in November 2002 to bw10 major recreation facihties created by new Oevelopment such as communiry centers,gymnasmms,
Jswimminq pools,antl senior/teen centers
�
Police CorpYartl FireSupp Rec
Gen ACmm CmlcCenler(1) FeGlily Relaw�ion liE�aMOS System FaGlilies
5]1 56]IS]2 593 5]4 5]5 576 582 TOTAL
Beginning Balance,07/01/12 $ 3,978,737 $ 9,917,850 $ (1,342,816) $ 2,569,836 $ 10,075,405 $(11,500,795) $ (5,120,048) $ 8,578,169
Revenues
DIF Revenues 569,719 7,109,776 7,247,654 337,811 1,350,080 1,055,676 1,063,349 6,808,865
Investment Eamings (21,162) (53,641) (4,969) (74,308) (56,150) (49,483) (20,592) (220,306) .
O��erRevenue - - - - - - - -
Reimbursement-OlhAgenGes - - - - - - - � -
Transferin - - - - - - - � -
ExpendiWres,
Personnel Servicos Total - - - - - - - -
Supplies 8 Services (490) - - - - - - (490)
Ciry Staff Services (232,517) - - - - - - (232,517)
OtherReNnds - - - - - - - , -
Caprtal FxpentliNres - - - - - - - -
pP Pmjecl Expentlilures - - - - - - - -
Trans(erOUt (2438514) (1723283) (59545) (4.221,342)
Unaudited Entling Balance,06/30/1 5 4,294,287 $ 8,615,472 $ (7,823,414) $ 2,887,338 $ 17,310,590 $('10,494,601) $ (4,077,291) $ 10,712,379
NOTE: (1) This fund includes the amount set aside for lhe acquisition of the Atlamo property in Fund 567.
ATTACHMENT B
PARKLAND ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT (PAD FEES)
FY 12/13 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
Description of Fee: In lieu fee for providing neighborhood communily park and recreational facilities.
Areas East of I-805
Amount of the Fee: $ 17,660 per single family dwelling unit
$ 13,106 per multi-family dwelling unit
$ 8,265 per mobile home dwelling unit
$ 7,555 per molel/hotel dwelling unit
Areas West of I-805
Amount of the Fee: $ 9,978 per single family dwelling unit
$ 7,405 per multi-family dwelling unit
$ 4,670 per mobile home dwelling unit
� $ 4,268 per motel/hotel dwelling unit
I
� FY 12/13 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION:
FUND 715
PAD FUND
Beginning Balance, 07/01/12 $ 31,665,764
Revenues:
Park Dedication Fees 4,344,267
Interest Earned (126,428)
Miscellaneous Revenues -
Expenditures:
Supplies and Services -
Other Refunds -
Transfer-Out Western PAD -
CIP Project Expenditures (3,616)
Unaudited Ending Balance, 06/30/13 $ 35,879,987
ATTACHMENT B.1
PARKLAND ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT (PAD FEES)
FY 12/13 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
FY 12/13 CIP EXPENDITURES:
PROJECT Total Appropriation % Of Project Funded Future Initially
PROJECT DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES at 6/30/13 by PAD Fees Appropriations Scheduled
PR261 Otay Ranch Community Park $ 2,940 697,764 100.00% - 2009
PR279 All Seasons park - 2,900,000 100.00% - 2007
PR303 Sunset View Park Roller Hockey Rink Modf - 150,000 100.00% - 2009
PR308 P-3 Neighborhood Park(ORV2) 676 122,000 100.00% - 2009
PR309 P-2 Neighborhood Park (ORV2) - 122,000 100.00% - 2009
O° TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 3,616
I
N
O
Note: The ending balance includes fees paid by specific developers for specific parks within those development. These parks
include Salt Creek Park, Montevalle Park, Mt. Miguel Park, Mountain Hawk, and the Otay Ranch Community Park.
ATfACHMENTC
TRUNK SEWER CAPITAL RESERVE
FY 12/13 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
Description of Fee: For the enlargement of sewer facilities of the City so as to enhance eKciency of ulilizalion and/or adequacy of capacity
and for planning and/or evaluating any future proposals for area wide sewage treatment and or water reclamation
systems or facilities.
Amount of the Fee: $ 3,478 per equivalent dwelling unit of flow when developing or modifying use of any residential
property
FY 12/13 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION:
� FUND 413
TRUNK SEWER
� (fS)
I
N Beginning Balance, 07/01112 $ 179,535,264
J
Interest Eamed 453,590
Developer Infrastructure Donations -
S@werage Facility Participant Fees 3,425,866
Trans(erin -
Expenditures:
Depreciation Expense- Infrastructure (5,096,687)
Contribulions to Olher Agencies(City of SD) -
CIP Projecl Expenditures (294,862)
Unaudited Ending Balance,06/30/13 $ 178,023,170
� 1 ATTACHMENT C.1
TRUNK SEWER CAPITAL RESERVE
FY 12/13 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
FY 12113 EXPENDITURES: �
PROJECT Total Approp. % Of Project Funded Future Initially
PROJECT DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES at 6/30/13 by TRUNK SEWER Appropriations Scheduled
OP203 Property and Easement Studies $ 2,762 11,000 100.00% - 2005
SW219 99/Slt Creek Trunk Sewer Conslructio� 7,706 706,679 73.80% - 1999
SW223 Wastewater Master Plan 189,975 565,940 100.00% - 2001
SW232 Poggi Canyon Ext-Eastlake Pkwy - 1,124,364 100.00% - 2004
SW233 Moss Slreet Woodlawn to Broadway - 247,379 18.30% - 2007
SW234 Sewer Improvement Colorado J & K 296 965,883 100.00% - 2004
0D SW235 Main St. Sewer Hilltop-Fresno 1,752 120,965 100.00% - 2004
N SW258 Sewer Capacity Analysis 6,110 287,235 100.00% - 2007
N SW261 Industrial Blvd&Main Cap Enhance 257 140,000 100.00% - 2010
SW263 Anita Slreet Sewer Improvement 82,095 1,160,000 100.00% - 2011
SW265 Industrial Blvd At Moss& K - 400,000 100.00°/a - 2011
SW266 Oxford Street Sewer Improvement 1,118 670,000 100.00°/a - 2011
SW272 Moss St Swr Improv. al Railroad Cros: - 500,000 100.00% , 100,000 2012
SW274 East H Slreet Sewer Main Upsize 2,791 1,500,000 100.00% - 2013
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 294,862
ATI'ACHMENT C.2
TRUNK SEWER CAPITAL RESERVE
FY 12113 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
LOANS:
Outstanding
Description of Loan Loan Amount Interest Rate
Loan to Slorm Drain Fund, approved by
Council Resolution#18996 on May 19, 1998 $ 264,025 6.07%
Loan to Slorm Drain Fund, approved by
Council Resolution#19078 on July 16, 1999
for project DR140(Storm Drain Repair-Orange) 64,966 5.90%
Loan to Storm Drain Fund, approved by
Council Resolution#19607 on Nov. 24, 1999
� for project DR 147(CMP Storm Drain Replacement) 253,565 5.88°/a
I
^� Loan to Storm Drain Fund, approved by
W Council Resolution#19682 on Jan. 19, 2000 90,453 5.88%
Advance to Salt Creek Sewer DIF approved
by Council Resolution#2001-203 on June 19,2001 10,908,880 5.88%
Advance lo Salt Creek Sewer DIF approved
by Council Resolution#2002-222 on June 18,2002 2,102,690 5.34%
Advance to Salt Creek Sewer DIF approved
by Council Resolution#2002-297 on August 13, 2002 3,025,888 1.90%
Advance to Salt Creek Sewer DIF approved
by Council Resolution#2003-278 on June 17, 2003 1,139,411 1.50%
Total $ 17,849,877