Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 4 - PCM 13-09C H U L A V I S T A PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT Item• Meeting Date: 5/22/13 ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING (PCM- 13 -09) CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE TO CONSOLIDATE THE DUTIES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND DESIGN REVIEW BOARD. (City Initiated) RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY ADOPT AN ORDINANCE REGARDING THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION; RESCINDING CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 2.47 (DESIGN REVIEW BOARD) AND CHAPTER 2.55 (CHULA VISTA REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION) AND REMOVING REFERENCES TO THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AND CHULA VISTA REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION IN THE MUNICIPAL CODE SUBMITTED BY: Marilyn R.F. Ponseggi, Principal Planner REVIEWED BY: Gary Halbert, Development Services Director / Assistant City Manag G l l INTRODUCTION: As a result of the process improvements that the City Council adopted in April 2010, Council directed staff to review the functions and duties of the Design Review Board and Planning Commission and to determine if the responsibilities of the two groups should be merged. After seeking input from the Planning Commission along with members of the Design Review Board, staff is now returning with an ordinance that would transfer the design review responsibilities currently under the purview of the Design Review Board to the Planning Commission. The proposed ordinance also removes references to the Design Review Board from various sections of the Municipal Code. As a clean-up to the City Council dissolution of the Chula Vista Redevelopment Corporation (CVRC), the ordinance removes all references to the CVRC from the Municipal Code. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378(b)(5) of the State CEQA Guidelines because it involves only a change to the Planning Commission's responsibilities and therefore is an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environmental; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is necessary. PCM -13 -09 RECOMMENDATION Page No. 2 That the Planning Commission approve the Resolution recommending the City Council adopt the ordinance. DISCUSSION Background In accordance with Chapter 2.42, the Planning Commission (PC) serves as the planning agency for the City. It guides the preparation of the General Plan and makes recommendations to the City Council about the General Plan. It evaluates physical development in the City, conducts public hearings on significant planning, zoning, and land subdivision matters and it recommends action and policy to the City Council related to major land use matters. The Design Review Board's (DRB) purpose is to ensure that development within the City of Chula Vista is orderly and of a high quality. The DRB is responsible for ensuring that development is consistent with the City's design guidelines through its review of plans for the establishment, location, expansion or alteration of multi - family residential uses and structures and all non - residential uses and structures. Their review process is limited to site plans, elevations, signs, landscape areas and materials. The DRB was established in 1977 in part to relieve the PC of certain routine functions necessary to the proper administration of the newly adopted Chapter 19.14, Administrative Procedures — Permits — Applications — Hearings — Appeals. Chapter 19.14 is the framework for administering the City's Design Guidelines. The Design Guidelines were established inl994 in part because the Council wanted to intensify the City's efforts to improve its townscape, and to promote orderly growth and amenities. The membership of the DRB with citizens who were knowledgeable of and sensitive to design considerations helped to successfully administer the Guidelines. Through the years of significant development in the City beginning around 1998, the DRB and PC met twice a month and regularly with full agendas. With the decline in development since 2006, the level of projects being reviewed by both bodies has dropped. In addition, the implementation of the 2010 Process Improvement Amendments resulted in the Zoning Administrator (ZA) now handling more of the projects that were previously considered by the PC or DRB. The Process Improvements Amendments also introduced the "Consolidated Hearing" process, which allows projects that previously would have been heard by multiple bodies to be consolidated into one hearing by the highest decision making body. As a result, the frequency of the meetings and the number of items on the agendas for the DRB has declined. Current Membership Requirements for PC and DRB In accordance with the City's Charter, the requirements for membership on the PC are consistent with most of the other Boards and Commissions in the City. Members must be City residents and over 18 years old. The requirements for membership on the DRB are that members must be sensitive to design consideration and interested in townscape matters. Membership of the DRB shall include architects, landscape architects, land planners, and other design professionals with suitable experience. PCM -13 -09 Proposed Amendment Page No. 3 The following is a description of the major points in the proposed amendments. The proposed amendments are consistent with the Process Improvements Amendments. The proposed amendments also acknowledge the need for individuals who have knowledge about design and townscape to be appointed to at least three of the Planning Commission seats. Proposed PC Membership Qualifications to Address Design Expertise No changes are proposed to the number of Planning Commissioners which currently is seven. Although Commissioners are not currently required to have specific expertise, staff recommends that at least three PC members should be persons sensitive to design consideration and interested in townscape matters such as architects, landscape architects, land planners, urban planners, civil engineers and other design professionals with suitable experience. This will ensure that the PC has the necessary expertise to assume the role currently held by the DRB. Accordingly, amendments to Chapter 2.42 are proposed. Other Minor Clean-Up Changes to the Municipal Code In 2011 the City Council directed staff to move forward with the dissolution of the Chula Vista Redevelopment Corporation (CVRC). In accordance with that direction, on December 12, 2011 staff brought forward a Dissolution Resolution to the CVRC. Although the CVRC was dissolved, references to the CVRC were not removed from the Municipal Code. Various amendments have been included in the proposed Ordinance to remove the references to the CVRC. DECISION -MAKER CONFLICTS Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site specific and consequently the 500 foot rule found in California Code of Regulations Section 18704.2(a)(1) is not applicable to this decision. Staff is not independently aware, nor has staff been informed by any Planning Commissioner, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. CONCLUSION Combining the duties of the DRB and PC are consistent with the City's goal of operating efficiently. The quantity of development projects going through the discretionary entitlement process has reduced dramatically due to the Process Improvement Amendments. Therefore, staff believes that the merging of the responsibilities of the DRB with the PC is appropriate at this time. FISCAL IMPACT The proposed action will result in a reduction in the administrative costs associated with the DRB. Attachments: i. City Council Draft Ordinance RESOLUTION PCM 13 -09 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE REGARDING THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION; RESINDING CHAPTER 2.47 (DESIGN REVIEW BOARD) AND CHAPTER 2.55 (CHULA VISTA REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION) AND REMOVING REFERENCES TO THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AND CHULA VISTA REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION IN THE MUNICIPAL CODE (PCM 13 -09) WHEREAS, the City Council created the Design Review Board in 1977 in order to relieve the Planning Commission of certain routine functions necessary to implement the City's newly adopted Design Review Procedures known as Chapter 19.14; and, WHEREAS, the Council also wanted to intensify the City's efforts at that time to improve its townscape, and to promote orderly growth and amenity; and, WHEREAS, the Design Review Board's duties primarily govern the implementation of design review procedures for permits, applications and hearings; and, WHEREAS, through the years of significant development in the City, the Design Review Board and the Planning Commission met twice a month and regularly had full agendas; and, WHEREAS, with the decline in development beginning in 2006, the level of projects being reviewed by both bodies has dropped; and, WHEREAS, the implementation of Process Improvement Amendments to the Zoning Code has resulted in the Zoning Administrator now handling more of the projects that were previously reviewed by the Planning Commission or Design Review Board; and, WHEREAS, as a result of the Process Improvement amendments, the frequency of the meetings and the number of items on the agendas for both the Planning Commission and Design Review Board has declined; and, WHEREAS, consolidating the responsibilities of the Design Review Board and the Planning Commission as proposed will be beneficial to furthering the goals of the Process Improvement Amendments; and, Resolution PCM 13 -09 May 22, 2013 ['age 12 WHEREAS, in, 2011 the City Council voted to dissolve the Chula Vista Redevelopment Corporation (CVRC); and, WHEREAS, on December 12, 2011 the Chula Vista Redevelopment Corporation passed a Dissolution Resolution; and, WHEREAS, there are numerous references to the CVRC through the City's Municipal Code that need to be removed; and, WHEREAS, a hearing time and place was set by the Planning Commission for consideration of the Project and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider said Project at the time and place as advertised, namely May 22, 2011 at 6 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, and said hearing was thereafter closed. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378(b)(5) of the State CEQA Guidelines because it involves only a change the Planning Commission's responsibilities and therefore is an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environmental; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is necessary. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends that the City of Chula Vista City Council approve the attached draft City Council Ordinance to amend sections of the Chula Vista Municipal Code to move the responsibilities of the Design Review Board to the Planning Commission, remove references to the Design Review Board from the Code, and remove references to the Chula Vista Redevelopment Commission from the Municipal Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the City Council. Presented by: Gary Halbert, P.E., AICP Assistant City Manager /Development Services Director Approved as to form by: Glenn R. Googins City Attorney Resolution PCM 13 -09 May 22, 2013 Page 13 PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 22nd day of May, 2013, by the following vote, to -wit: AYES: Anaya, Calvo, Livag, Moctezuma, Spethman, Vinson NOES: n/a ABSENT: n/a ABSTAIN: n/a Lisa Moctezuma, Chair ATTEST: Patricia Laughlin, Secretary Attachment 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2013 - ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 2.42 REGARDING THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION; RESCINDING CHAPTERS 2.47 (DESIGN REVIEW BOARD) AND CHAPTER 2.55 ( CHULA VISTA REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION) AND REMOVING REFERENCES TO THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AND CHULA VISTA REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION THEREIN WHEREAS, the City Council created the Design Review Board in 1977 in order to relieve the Planning Commission of certain routine functions necessary to implement the City's newly adopted Design Review Procedures known as Chula Vista Municipal Code (CVMC) Chapter 19.14; and WHEREAS, the City Council also wanted to intensify the City's efforts at that time to improve its townscape, and to promote orderly growth and amenity; and WHEREAS, the Design Review Board's duties primarily govern the implementation of design review procedures for permits, applications and hearings; and WHEREAS, through the years of significant development in the City, the Design Review Board and the Planning Commission met twice a month and regularly had full agendas; and WHEREAS, with the decline in development since 2006, the level of projects being reviewed by both bodies has dropped; and WHEREAS, the implementation of Process Improvement Amendments to the Zoning Code has resulted in the Zoning Administrator now handling more of the projects that were previously reviewed by the Planning Commission or Design Review Board; and WHEREAS, as a result of the Process Improvement Amendments, the frequency of the meetings and the number of items on the agendas for both the Planning Commission and Design Review Board has declined; and WHEREAS, consolidating the responsibilities of the Design Review Board and the Planning Commission as proposed will be beneficial to furthering the goals of the Process Improvement Amendments; and WHEREAS, in 2011 the City Council voted to dissolve the Chula Vista Redevelopment Corporation (CVRC); and WHEREAS, on December 12, 2011 the CVRC passed a Dissolution Resolution; and WHEREAS, there are numerous references to the CVRC through the City's Municipal Code that need to be removed; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the subject action at the time and place as advertised, namely May 22, 2013 at 6 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, and approved Resolution PCM- 13-09 recommending that the City Council adopt the proposed Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the subject action at the time and place as advertised and said hearing was thereafter closed. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED, that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find and determine as follows: Section I. Environmental Determination The activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378(b)(5) of the State CEQA Guidelines because it involves only an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environmental; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is necessary. Section II. Consistency with General Plan The City Council finds that the proposed amendments of the Municipal Code are consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan. The proposed code amendments are based on sound planning principles and practices that will provide for design review of projects in accordance with the goals and policies of the General Plan. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED, that the Chula Vista Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows: Section Ill. Amend Chula Vista Municipal Code Chapters 2.25, 2.42, 2.47, 2.55, 15.44, 15.56, 18.08, 19.06, 19.07, 19.14, 19.28, 19.30, 19.42, 19.44, 19.46, 19.47, 19.54, 19.56, 19.58, 19.60 and 19.62 to delete references to the Design Review Board and Chula Vista Redevelopment Corporation, modify the membership requirements for the pg. 2 Ordinance Rescinding Chapter 2.47 Attachment 1 Planning Commission and where appropriate add references to the Planning Commission as described below: Chapter 2.25 General Rules for Boards and Commissions Section 2.25.020 Definitions. B. "Boards and commissions" include: (1) boards and commissions established by the Chula Vista Charter: Board of Library Trustees, Civil Service Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission, and Planning Commission; and (2) boards and commissions established by the City Council: Access Appeals Board, Board of Appeals and Advisors, Board of Ethics, Charter Review Commission, Child Care Commission, Commission on Aging, Cultural Arts Commission, , Economic Development Commission, Growth Management Oversight Commission, Housing Advisory Commission, Human Relations Commission, International Friendship Commission, Mobilehome Rent Review Commission, Resource Conservation Commission, Safety Commission, Veterans Advisory Commission, and other boards or commissions subsequently created by City Charter or ordinance. Chapter 2.42 Planning Commission Section 2.42.030 Membership. In accordance with Charter Section 605, the Planning Commission shall consist of seven members to be appointed by the City Council from the registered voters of the City. The number of members to comprise the Commission may be changed by ordinance of the City Council; however, the number may be set at no fewer than five and no more than nine. A minimum of three (3) members of the Planning Commission should be persons sensitive to design consideration and interested in townscape matters. Persons qualified for these seats should include architects landscape architects, land planners, urban planners civil engineers and other design professionals with suitable experience. Chapter 2.47 Design Review Board Repealed Chapter 2.55 Chula Vista Redevelopment Corporation Repealed pg. 3 Ordinance Rescinding Chapter 2.47 Attachment 1 Chapter 15.44 Moving, Relocating and Demolishing Buildings Section 15.44.030 Application for permit. A. Whenever an existing building, house or structure is moved from its present location outside the City to a new location within the City, or from one location within the City to another location within the City, the house mover or other person, firm or corporation moving a house, building, or structure shall, prior to moving, file an application for a moving permit with the Building and Housing Department. Said application shall contain the following information: 5. Multifamily projects shall be processed through the Design Review Committee Planning Commission, as provided under CVMC 19.28.180 and 19.28.190. The fee shall be as specified in the master fee schedule; Chapter 15.56 Conversion of Dwelling Units to Independent Ownership Section 15.56.020 (G). Condominium projects shall comply with the guidelines of the design manual of the city, and shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission, except where condominium projects are located with the Chula Vista Town Centre No. I redevelopment project area, in which case the guidelines of the Town Centre design manual shall govern, and the reviewing body shall be the Tewn Centre desiq^ ' ° "'°'"` beafd Planning Commission.. Notwithstanding the provisions of this subsection, the property owner shall not be required to make major structural or spatial changes to existing buildings. Chapter 18.08 Definitions Section 18.08.070 Commission "Commission" means the Planning Commission of Chula Vista er the Chula Vista Chapter 19.06 General Plan Section 19.06.030 Implementation of Projects shall be deemed to be substantially processed where the property owners have procured approved tentative subdivision or parcel maps, building permits, conditional pg. 4 Ordinance Rescinding Chapter 2.47 Attachment 1 use permits, or Planninq Commission approvals, in furtherance of the proposed projects. The zoning administrator, furthermore, may deem that projects have been substantially processed where the involved property owners have submitted tentative subdivision or parcel maps or applications for design review, but are awaiting consideration by the appropriate city agency or official, as well as projects which have been submitted to the planning department for design review consideration not more than six months prior to the adoption of the general plan. The property owner shall provide evidence to the zoning administrator not more than 90 days after the general plan adoption that the submittal of project plans has occurred within the aforementioned specified period to qualify for this provision. Chapter 19.07 Specific Plans Section 19.07.030 Zoning implementation thereof. Projects shall be deemed to be substantially processed where the property owners have procured approved tentative subdivision or parcel maps, building permits, conditional use permits, or Planning Commission approvals, in furtherance of the proposed projects. The zoning administrator, furthermore, may deem that projects have been substantially processed where the involved property owners have submitted tentative subdivision or parcel maps or applications for design review, but are awaiting consideration by the appropriate city agency or official. Chapter 19.14 Administrative Procedures — Permits — Applications — Hearings — Appeals ...19.14.110 Conditional use permit —Appeals of the Planning Commission eta Vista Redevelopment GorpeFatiGn decision — Form — Contents — Effect of filing. ...19.14.120 Conditional use permit — Appeals of Planning Commission OF Chula Vi decision — City Clerk duties. ...49.14.587 - ...19.14.590 Fees for appeals and requested actions before the Desig T;?e"` °' "' R Planninq Commission and Zoning Administrator. pg. 5 Ordinance Rescinding Chapter 2.47 Attachment 1 Section 19.14.050 Public hearing - Mandatory when - Consolidation of public hearings for multiple permit applications. A. The Zoning Administrator may, at her /his option, refer any of the matters on which she /he is authorized to rule and /or issue a permit to the Planning Commission, OF la pFejeGt area-, for review. In addition, a project applicant may request that any such matter be referred directly to the Planning Commission ^r Ghula Vista + RedevelopmQ"f for action. In such cases, a public hearing as provided herein shall be mandatory. ...C. When an applicant applies for more than one permit or other approval for a single development, the applications shall be consolidated for processing and shall be reviewed by a single decision maker or decision - making body. The consolidated application shall be heard by the decision maker or decision - making body associated with the highest level action among the applications to be considered. The findings required for approval of each permit shall be considered individually, consistent with CVMC 19.14.080, 19.14.190 and /or 19.14.582(E) as applicable. For projects subject to design review and that are consolidated to a higher decision - making level, one member of the Planning Commission DeGigR Review Bewd, 9F the Chula Vista Redevelopm with design expertise, may advise the staff on the design aspects of the project prior to the public hearing. The recommendations will be included in the staff report to the highest level decision - making body. Section 19.14.110 Conditional use permit - Appeals of the Planning Commission decision - Form - Contents - Effect of filing. The applicant or other interested person may appeal from the decision of the Planning Commission, ar Chula Vista Redevelopment GeFpwatime���� granting or denying any conditional use permit to the City Council within 10 business days from the date on which the decision was made. Said appeal shall be in writing and filed with the City Clerk upon forms provided by the Development Services Department and shall specify therein that the decision of the Planning Commission, OF Chula Vista Redevelopm was in error and identify the facts and circumstances on which the claim of error is based. If an appeal is filed within the time limit specified, it automatically stays proceedings in the matter until a determination is made by the City Council. Where an application is neither approved nor denied by the Planning Commission Chula Vista Redevelopment GE)FIDOFation feF pFejeGtS within a designated Fedevele-ment project -area, due to a failure to achieve a majority vote, the applicant shall have the right to either a rehearing at the next Planning Commission 9F ChulVista Redeyeiepmen pg. 6 Ordinance Rescinding Chapter 2.47 Attachment 1 with an opportunity to appeal the decision of the rehearing to the City Council, or may appeal directly to the City Council without payment of additional fees. The choice of alternatives shall be at the discretion of the applicant. All other proceedings pertaining to appeals shall continue to apply. Section 19.14.120 Conditional use permit — Appeals of Planning Commission of decision — City Clerk duties. Upon the filing of the appeal, the City Clerk shall set the matter for public hearing, giving the same notice as required in CVMC 19.12.060 through 19.12.080. The matter shall be placed on the Council agenda and heard within 30 days of receipt of a valid application for appeal. The City Clerk shall send the Development Services Department a duplicate copy of the appeal and request the Planning Commission, GF Chula af.ea�, to transmit to the City Council a copy of its decision and findings, minutes of the hearing and all other evidence, maps, papers and exhibits upon which the Planning Commission, 9F Chula Vista Redevelopment GqFpafatien, made its decision. Section 19.14.130 Conditional use permit — Appeals — City Council action — Resolution contents and transmittal. Upon the hearing of such appeal, the City Council may, by resolution, affirm, reverse or modify in whole or in part any determination of the Zoning Administrator or Planning Commission, , subject to the same limitations and requirements of findings as are placed upon the Zoning Administrator or Planning Commission, , by this chapter. The resolution must contain a finding of facts showing wherein the conditional use meets or fails to meet the requirements of CVMC 19.14.080. The decision by the City Council on the appeal is final. Not later than 10 business days following the adoption of said resolution, the City Clerk shall transmit a copy of the resolution and finding to the Director of Development Services, and shall mail a copy to the applicant. Section 19.14.579 Precise plan approval — Multiple - family dwellings and commercial or industrial projects. Notwithstanding the provisions of other sections of this chapter, the review of precise plans for multiple - family dwelling, commercial, or industrial projects shall be procedurally governed by the rules adopted by the DesigR Review BeaFd Flaming Commission, ted undeF GVIVIG 19.1-581. Section 19.14.580 Precise plan approval — Multiple - family dwellings and commercial or industrial projects — Zoning Administrator. Following the approval or conditional approval of a precise plan for a multiple - family dwelling, commercial, or industrial project by the Planning Commission or, upon appeal, by the City Council, the building pg. 7 Ordinance Rescinding Chapter 2.47 Attachment 1 inspector shall ensure that the development is undertaken and completed in conformance with the approved plan. Section 19.14.581 Repealed Section 19.14.582 Design review approval. A. Plans for the establishment, location, expansion or alteration of structures in all multifamily residential zones and all commercial and industrial zones shall require design review by the , Plannin Commission. B. The Beard Planning Commission shall approve, conditionally approve or deny such plans. The Des ;gR Review Beard Planning Commission shall base its findings and actions on the design review provisions of the affected design manuals of the City. C. The Zoning Administrator has the discretion, with the concurrence of the applicant, to act in the place of the Design Revie �° Planning Commission in the case of minor projects, including new construction or additions to commercial, industrial, or institutional projects with a total floor area of 20,000 square feet or less, and residential projects of 10 units or less. The Zoning Administrator shall base its findings and actions upon the provisions of the affected design manuals of the City. Section 19.14.583 Design review application and fee. ... B. The fee for a hearing before the Design Review aFd Planning Commission is the required fee(s). The fee for Zoning Administrator design review shall be the required fee(s).. Section 19.14.587 Repealed Section 19.14.588 Design review — Appeal procedure. A. The applicant or other interested persons may file an appeal from the decision of the Planning Commission or Zoning Administrator for minor projects, to the City Council within 10 business days after the decision is made. The appeal shall be in writing and filed with the Development Services Department on forms prescribed for the appeal, and shall specify therein the argument against the decision of the Design review -Beard Planninq Commission. If an appeal is filed within the time limit specified, it automatically stays proceedings in the matter until a determination is made by the City Council. pg. 8 Ordinance Rescinding Chapter 2.47 Attachment 1 B. Upon the hearing of such appeal, the City Council may, by resolution, affirm, reverse or modify, in whole or in part, any determination of the DeGig^- Re, ' ° °•" Q° "d Planninq Commission or Zoning Administrator for minor projects. The resolution must contain a finding of facts showing wherein the project meets or fails to meet the requirements of this chapter and the provisions of the design review manual. C. The decision of the City Council is final. Section 19.14.590 Fees for appeals and requested actions before the Planning Commission and Zoning Administrator. For all appeals from actions of the Design R [z.,.� Planning Commission or Zoning Administrator or any appeal filed pursuant to Chapter 19.12 CVMC or this chapter, the fee shall be the required fee(s). In addition, any request for action by the City Council PlaRROAg COMMi66ion not specifically covered within the fee structure established by this chapter shall be subject to the required fee(s) therefor. (Ord. 3153 § 2 (Exh. A), 2010; Ord. 2506 § 1, 1992; Ord. 2011 § 1, 1982; Ord. 1813 § 2, 1978). Section 19.14.591 Continuance of project. Repealed. 19.14.592 Implementation of Design Review Board functions in designated areas by Chula Vista Redevelopment Corporation. Repealed Section 19.14.600 Design review approval — Time limit for implementation — Extensions. ...C. Request for Extension. Prior to the expiration of a permit, the appropriate decision maker, whether the Zoning Administrator or the Planning Commission, 9F Chula Vista area; may grant an extension of time contained in a currently valid permit without a public hearing upon request of the property owner; provided, that: 1. There has been no material change of circumstances since the granting of the permit; 2. That such changes, if any, which, when considered in conjunction with the construction or use of property theretofore permitted, would not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Chapter 19.28 R -3 — APARTMENT RESIDENTIAL ZONE pg. 9 Ordinance Rescinding Chapter 2.47 Attachment 1 19.28.190 Jurisdiction of the Design Review BGaFd Planning Commission. Section 19.28.060 Height regulations. A. Height regulations in the R -3 zone and R -3 -M, R -3 -T and R -3 -G classifications are as follows: ...2. Principal buildings up to three and one -half stories or 45 feet in height may be approved by the Design Review BeaFd Planning Commission; provided, it is found that the height, bulk, mass and proportion of all structures are compatible with the site, as well as in scale with structures on adjoining and surrounding properties in the area. Section 19.28.070 Area, lot width and yard requirements. ... (2) Side and rear yards: Side and rear yard requirements shall be increased an additional two feet for 25- foot -high structures (this dimension shall include the roof), and shall be increased at the rate of two feet for each story above 25 feet. Exception: When adjacent to an R -1, R -E or R -2 zone, the side yard setback shall be increased to 15 feet for any structure over one story or 15 feet in height, with an additional two -foot setback required for each story above 25 feet in height. In those cases where the rear yard abuts an R -3, commercial or industrial zone, the D° inn Revie w Beard Planning Commission may grant up to a 10 -foot reduction in the rear yard setback; provided, it is found that the affected open space has been transferred to a more beneficial location on the lot. Section 19.28.190 Jurisdiction of the Planning Commission Design Review Board. The design manual of the City shall be effectuated and administered by the Design Planning Commission, thFeugh 19.14.599. Chapter 19.30 C -O — Administrative and Professional Office Zone Section 19.30.040 Conditional uses. The following uses shall be permitted in the C -O zone; provided, a conditional use permit is issued in accordance with the provisions of CVMC 19.14.030(A) or 19.14.040, as may be applicable, and CVMC 19.14.050 through 19.14.090: ... I. Recycling collection centers, subject to the provisions of CVMC 19.58.345. The following uses shall be permitted in the C -O zone, provided, a conditional use permit is issued by the Planning Commission, 9F Chula Vi6ta RedevekqwAe4# pg. 10 Ordinance Rescinding Chapter 2.47 Attachment 1 or for unclassified uses as defined in CVMC 19.54.020: Chapter 19.42 I -R — Research Industrial Zone Section 19.42.040 Conditional uses. The following uses shall be permitted in the I -R zone; provided, a conditional use permit is issued in accordance with the provisions of CVMC 19.14.030(A) or 19.14.040, as may be applicable, and CVMC 19.14.050 through 19.14.090: ... F. Hazardous waste facilities, subject to the provisions of CVMC 19.58.178. Conditional use permit applications for the establishment of hazardous waste facilities shall be considered by the City Council subsequent to its receipt of recommendations thereon from the Planning Commission, 9F Chula Vista area, in accordance with CVMC 19.14.070(B). Chapter 19.44 I -L — Limited Industrial Zone Section 19.44.040 Conditional uses. The following uses shall be permitted in the I -L zone; provided, a conditional use permit is issued in accordance with the provisions of CVMC 19.14.030(A) or 19.14.040, as may be applicable, and CVMC 19.14.050 through 19.14.090: ....P. Hazardous waste facilities, subject to the provisions of CVMC 19.58.178. Conditional use permit applications for the establishment of hazardous waste facilities shall be considered by the City Council subsequent to its receipt of recommendations thereon from the Planning Commission, OF Chula Vista ar=ea-, in accordance with CVMC 19.14.070(B). Chapter 19.46 1— General Industrial Zone Section 19.46.040 Conditional uses. The following uses shall be permitted in the I zone; provided, a conditional use permit is issued by the Planning Commission, OF Chula Vi6ta Redevelopment GGFPGFatie or for unclassified uses as defined in CVMC 19.54.020: pg. 11 Ordinance Rescinding Chapter 2.47 Attachment 1 ... P. Hazardous waste facilities, subject to the provisions of CVMC 19.58.178. Conditional use permit applications for the establishment of hazardous waste facilities shall be considered by the City Council subsequent to its receipt of recommendations thereon from the Planning Commission, OFGhula Vista area; in accordance with CVMC 19.14.070(6). Chapter 19.47 P -Q — Public /Quasi - Public 19.47.040 Conditional uses. The following uses shall be permitted in the P -Q zone; provided, a conditional use permit is issued by the Planning Commission, oF Chula Vista RedevelopmeR or for unclassified uses as defined in CVMC 19.54.020: ....K. Hazardous waste facilities, subject to the provisions of CVMC 19.58.178. Conditional use permit applications for the establishment of hazardous waste facilities shall be considered by the City Council subsequent to its receipt of recommendations thereon from the Planning Commission, 9F Ghula Vista afea, in accordance with CVMC 19.14.070(6). Chapter 19.54 Unclassified Uses Section 19.54.020 Designated — Limitations and standards. ...Conditional use permit applications for the uses listed in this section shall be considered and approved by the following body or official. The Zoning Administrator shall approve all ambulance services, trailers (commercial coaches), and certified farmers' markets. The City Council, subsequent to its receipt of recommendations thereon from the planning commission, 9F Chula Vista Redevelopment Gerperatie shall approve establishments or enterprises involving large assemblages of people or automobiles (subsection (J) of this section), and public or quasi - public uses (subsection (M) of this section). The Planning Commission, 9F Chula Vista Redevelopment GerpeFatffia shall approve all other conditional use permits for unclassified uses not mentioned in this paragraph. pg. 12 Ordinance Rescinding Chapter 2.47 Attachment 1 Chapter 19.56 Modifying Districts Section 19.56.048 P precise plan modifying district — Plan review of multiple - family dwellings and commercial or industrial projects. Notwithstanding the provisions of CVMC 19.56.047, plans for multiple - family dwellings and commercial or industrial projects in areas governed by the P precise plan modifying district shall be reviewed by the desig^ Fevie ., GOMM* + °° Planning Commission and shall be considered by the planRuRg G and the City Council only upon appeal, pursuant to CVMC 19.14.583. Chapter 19.58 Uses Section 19.58.345 Recycling collection centers. ... C. Large recycling collection centers with a combined area of over 300 square feet, but not exceeding the floor area equivalent of a 30- person occupancy load, may be permitted as an accessory or primary use subject to the approval of a conditional use permit granted by the Zoning Administrator pursuant to CVMC 19.14.040, and with approval of an application for site plan and architectural review by the Design R°� °• BeaFd Planning Commission. Section 19.58.390 Senior housing development. Pursuant to CVMC 19.54.020, housing developments for seniors, as defined in CVMC 19.04.201, may be allowed in any zone except the R -1, R -2, C -V, C -T and industrial zones. Because the residents of such development have dwelling characteristics which differ from those of families and younger persons, it is not appropriate to apply all of the normal zoning standards thereto. Accordingly, pursuant to the processing of a conditional use permit for such developments, as required by CVMC 19.54.020(P), the Planning Commission, eF Chula Vi6ta Redevelopment G9FpeFatiGn if the pFojeGt 06 within may make exceptions to the density, off - street parking, minimum unit size, open space, and such other requirements as may be appropriate. The Planning Commission may also adjust required setbacks, building height, and yard areas as appropriate to provide an adequate living environment both within the development and on nearby properties. Any exceptions and adjustments shall be subject to the condition that the development will be available for occupancy by seniors only. Section 19.58.400 Recreational vehicle storage yards. ...The approval of an RV storage yard judged by the Planning Commission, or Chula pg. 13 Ordinance Rescinding Chapter 2.47 Attachment 1 aFea,, to represent an interim use of land based upon zoning, development patterns, and /or pending plans in the area shall be subject to a review and report filed each year by the owner with the City Zoning Administrator. Failure to file the report or abide by the conditions of approval shall cause the matter to be set for a rehearing before the Planning Commission, or Chula Vista Redevelopment GGFPOFat*on of lGGated within a to consider revocation of the permit or other appropriate corrective action. Permits for interim RV storage yards shall be granted for a maximum period of five years with extensions subject to rehearing before the Planning Commission Chapter 19.60 Signs Section 19.60.520 Central business (C -B) zone. The following signs are allowed in C -B zones: ... E. The de6ig^ Fevie ., ^^"' M*tt °° Planning Commission may reduce sign areas and heights below those authorized above based on the sign guidelines and criteria contained in the design manual, without consideration of the graphic design of the copy or message displayed on the sign. Chapter 19.62 Off - Street Parking and Loading Section 19.62.020 Size and access requirements. Size and access of off - street parking and loading facilities shall be as follows: ... E. Tandem parking shall not qualify as required parking unless specifically approved by the Planning Commission, aF Chula Vista Redevelopmen Section IV. Severability If any portion of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for any reason held to be invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional, by a court of competent jurisdiction, that portion shall be deemed severable, and such invalidity, unenforceability or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining portions of the Ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council of the City of Chula Vista hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, sentences, clauses or phrases of the Ordinance be declared invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional. pg. 14 Ordinance Rescinding Chapter 2.47 Attachment 1 Section V. Construction The City Council of the City of Chula Vista intends this Ordinance to supplement, not to duplicate or contradict, applicable state and federal law and this Ordinance shall be construed in light of that intent. Section VI. Effective Date This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force on the thirtieth day after its final passage. Section VII. Publication The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted according to law. Presented by: Approved as to form by: Gary Halbert, P.E., AICP Glen R. Googins Assistant City Manager /Development Services Director City Attorney pg. 15 Ordinance Rescinding Chapter 2.47 Attachment 1