HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013/10/01 Item 11 Presentation - Moot^? KI CF *Hr CRY COUNCIL
May 11, 2010 The Chum Vista City Council offers its strong support for the project
Ms. Mary iu ley, Protect Manager to develop a 1 ew t of i � Chin 4
Bay Bivd Substation Relocation
San Diego Gas & Electric
San Diego, rkCt.,CP21C Bayfront to replace the fifty year old substation that constrains
San Diego, CA 82123
mtuneyflsemprautihUes.com
Dear Ms. Turley:
The Chula Vista City oil offers its strong support for the project
to develop a ne to of the art substation on the Chula Vista
Bayfront to r ce the fifty year old substation that constrains
develop of public access, enhanced wildlife corridors, substantial
eco development and public serving infrastructure opportunities
for egion. The City is eager to have the new substation built and
the old substation removed immediately following the
decommissioning and dismantling of the South Bay Power Plant.
The decommissioning and removal of the South Bay Power Plant
(SBPP) and existing Substationiswitchyard were the primary
purposes behind the State's facilitation of the acquisition of the SBPP
by the Port of San Diego w 1997 Dismantling should have begun
between November 2009 and February 28. 2010. The removal of
infrastructure constraints the existing substation, transm+ssion and
distribution lattice towers and utility poles, are a primary component
of the 2004 Memorandum of Understanding between the City and
SDG &E. The removal of this infrastructure along with the remaining
tra io and distribution towers and utility poles are a critical
cote ent n of maximizing the opportunity for the Bay Front Master
Plan to ealize its full potential and create the wildlife habitat
protection and quality public amenities that Chula Vista and the South
Bay community have been planning for over a decade.
With SDG &E and the California Public Utilities Commission
assistance we took the first major steps in restoring this invaluable
Bayfront site and returning it to the people of South Bay. The Otay
Metro Loop project undergrounded three miles of 230kv transmission
lines along the Bayfront in 2006 to 2008 and the City invested over
$20,000,000 in 20a funds to underground the existing 938kv
transmission lines to facilitate the removal of the lattice towers from
the Bay Front. The results of the first phase of the tower removal that
occurred north of J Street last December have amazed all project
participants.
The City appreciates SDG &E's and the San Diego Unified Port
istrict's cooperation in moving forward another component of the
DG&EICity MOU, the development of a new smaller and lower
file substation at the southern edge of the existing South Bay
P wer Plant (SBPP) site. The construction of a new substation with
a quate buffer and screening, including solid walls, the removal of
th remaining utility poles and enhanced landscaping softening, will
silo the proposed facility to co exist in harmony with the adjacent
wild a habitat and conforms with the high expectations established
by 11 Bay Front Master Plan that the community has invested so
much in bringing to fruition over this past decade. We strongly
encou ge SDG &E to work with the City and Port to incorporate the
screen g and removal of the remaining wooden utility and
transmi ion poles and undergrounding from J Street to the
Substati in its application to the CPUC.
The City ks that the CPUC staff and Commissioners recognize the
major fin cial commitment and investment that Chula Vista has
made in thr project to date and urges the Commission to support this
important next step in updating the regional transmission and
distribution system and improving kcal onorgy reliability through a
strong investment in the Bay Boulevard Substation project
Thank you very much for your efforts and generous consideration.
The City of Chula Vista looks forward to working with SDG &E and the
CPUC on implementing a project in which we can all take great pride
for the next several decades
Sincerely,
Mayor and Council
CC: David Geier, VP Distribution & Transmission Infrastructure
The City appreciates SDG &E's and the San Diego Unified Part
�A-FW"
ol
jp
d`JGU..
Visual Simulation
Visual Simulation
r
City of Chula Vista
South day Substation
Relocation
Torben Aabo
Power Cable Consultants, Inc.
Ballston Spa, NY
Power Cable •
40 years Experience in the Cable Business
Manufacturing
Engineering
Research
Design of Underground Transmission Cable
Systems
Quality Control /Quality Assurance
Inspections of Cable Manufacturing Facilities
Inspections during Installation
Audit of Transmission Cable Systems
PCC's Involvement with
Underground Projects before
Public Utility Commissions
Vermont -two
transmission li
Safety and esth
Colorado - 7.5
transmission li
Esthetics
sections of 115 kV
ne undergrounded
etics
miles of 115 kV
ne undergrounded
R
PCC's Involvement with
Underground Projects before PUCs
Connecticut - 345 kV transmission
lines
Environmental, safety and esthetics
► 20 miles of 345 kV XLPE
transmission cable circuits were
installed.
R
ACC's Involvement with
Underground Project before PUCs
City of Chino Hills - 3.5 miles of 500
kV line through the center of the city
Safety and esthetics
Directly affected 260 property owners at
the edge of the power line and thousands
more with 200 foot tall towers visible from
a wide area of the city
10
Overhead lines will affect the area
Esthetics and land use
Further expansion within the
substation, as stated by SDG &E, may
require additional transmission lines
entering the substation
All other transmission lines will be
undergrounded, except the 230 kV line
11
System Load {requirements
SDE &E estimated load requirements:
11 75MVA (2950 amperes)
Some questions regarding how this load
requirement was established:
Required load with the proposed substation
equipment.
Required load with the future expanded
substation equipment.
Load requirements can be met with two
cables /phase
12
230 kV Pole-->
<--69 kV Transition Pole
ONE--
Visual Simulation
flon
138 kV Pole
to be eliminated
230 W Pole -->
i r
W wl t h t h e
Undergroun "dw
R-
<- Change to 230 W Transition Structure
ii I r
4�1
Visual Simulation 14
Estimated Cost of Undergrounding
300 feet of 230 kV Cable
Total Estimated Project Cost $15 7 M
Undergrounding 300 ft. will add
$2,663,000 or 1.7%
to the overall project
15
2310 kV Transition Structure
Visual Simulation
5.
16
Estimated host of
1 ,000 feet of
Undergrounding
zoo kV Cable
Total Estimated Project Cost $15 7 M
Undergrounding 1,000 ft. will add
$4,524,000 or 2.9%
to the overall project
17
-4r'roposed Solution
Negotiate with easement property owners to
install transition structure in the easement
Present to CAPUC the proposed
undergrounding of the 230 kV line from
other side of highway into substation at an
estimated cost of $4,524,000 an increase
of 2.9% to the estimated 157M South Bay
Substation Relocation Project
\1111
18
President Michael R. Peevey of
CAPUC statement when announcing
the China Hills decision
"It's the dawn of a new era in transmission
line planning in this state. In urban and
suburban areas, we have to look anew at
how we site transmission lines, and
carefully weigh their role in fulfilling the
state's energy goals against their impact
on community values.
19
6 - -ter --* �I(-_W r� - -
&
at• '
�.�r..w.
W V
Fl7Wrq OM PL
r
2LC kY L4�it
t� �
� "•�• ..r
°Aa',!�&r� af•.`ti,'Oww!.
kit,
a' w
[#1 = 7Y ',}[ l
V a
.`w
4r
'
aaoowi�v
*• d
LNG si;e
Ame"
*
¢
a
46
Y
IJ02
16
=xr ceWC rs.
....
25BIV M1 C M
-L
1
Sal[ ti
RIM PIE" amupmo
_
_ 'F •'.' :[r' k'- q
�srystall¢er
Panes
'
�r
k7.
_
*
nEW&
• ip
Project Overview Map (South)
Dotted lines all underground power /gas lines
Solid purple is the 230 W line— the only above ground
Rate Impact of Undergrounding 230kV
• Assumed $4 million
• Average rate increase
o + 0.000250 /kWh
o +0.0015%
0 1.50 per year for the typical residential customer
• For comparison:
o1/200th the cost of running a night light
o Less than the electricity cost to watch 1 football
game on TV
How Transmission Costs are Spread
• Paid for by all CAISO customers (SIDG&E, SCE and
PG &E) if:
D Voltage is above 200 kV
D Deemed needed by the CAISO
D 20A funds not applicable
• Includes all mitigation costs, including
undergrounding
— Chino Hills: Added $224 million to underground 3.5 miles
— Those costs are spread across all three California utilities
(including SDG &E)
Glenn Reddick, P.E.
BS Electrical Engineering
Registered Professional Engineer
California and 4 other states
EXPERTISE
• Substation Design — 230kV and below
• Overhead Line Design — 230kV and below
• Underground Line Design — 69kV and below
• Utility Operations — 230kV and below
— Sacramento Municipal Utility District
— Hercules Municipal Utility
Overhead vs Underground
Not Present with
Underground low
profile
Support 68 Ft height
becomes UG
-- ---------------------------- - - - - -tc �+ - - -�
Riser r
rl I��
� i ICI I. ��
II LI
jr n
II LI
or 11
II - II §I
p� i1 I I •• - Il IL
ff rl II
III
li A�
II �I
III 19
I - F�� A Tj is M T ?'P f: , R O
Low Profile vs Standard
How Tall?
• - Scale in Feet
100
60
—20
— 0
$OUNCE.$W &EPEAMO FIGURE B-6
l` Bay Boulevard Substation Profile View
6852 -01
South Bay Substation Relocation Project Draft EIR
Before and After
IM
l �f.
Visual Simulation
Visual Simulation
NO W, THEREFORE, the Parnes a,-ree as f011ows:
2004 MOU AGREEMENT "I-E.RMS
1.2 Bayfront Undergrounding: A key objective of the City is to remove all above
ground electric lines and associated hardware as described herein and to underground
such lines and associated hardware in the area identified in paragraph I.3 as the Bayfront.
The City and SDG&1 have agreed to work in concert to achieve that result as set forth in
this MOU.
1.3 Bayfront "Transmission Dines; SDG&E. has filed an application with the CPUC for
a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity ( "CPCN ") for construction of a new
230kV line and associated hardware that runs from the proposed Otay Mesa power plant
through Chula Vista including, in part, the Bayfront (the "Project ") ...
. .. SDG &E and City will cooperatively work to achieve the objective of
undergrounding the 230 kV line. . .
. . . . In the event at some
time during the terin of this MOU additional tram rnission or distribution lines are needed
along the Bayfront, SDG &.E agrees It will fill; for such Ittles to he Linder. grounded as a
preferred alternative and work cooperatively with the City to maintain this area as an
underground district,
1.7 ��i'itcJtva�•c!:
M �upon reloe(M1011 of the Switchyard and pursuzint to sections
1.4A and 1.4(-, the 138 k%` circuit locatcd from Tol,�rcr 2.8176 3 to approximately TOWCr
188701 will be undergrounded one tle City ihx� tNe 20A funds ),- nih�,!r
alternative funding the City may have (with Tmver 188-700 �above� i-,:-cA I I'll I"
i-cinoval of said 138 k-N% 'S"upporting
71�)! cione and paid for hy SM'XI", (()'ISkten[ With AS
T:-1t' Citywill t1i7loly Fill lild SD, &E
'Fl-nils
0 (i�,'TPI;I)Ljmli lhi construction, cojisisteni 1,vltli all 1:.m.,s -Ind
regultauons applicable to SD(j&,L C-aid ttie City,
. i• '1 ;•`;' +.r. I `.5: 1'lli .�..r' ',i r1:��:.1,.'•r .:.s .i�t.� •r: :. 'r'
F JJjjY�JJy � J} j[��f f'
FLL////''1__�d}} +I , ..I �'' ' rriijj JJ//jji]ry [/�`,�^7. �/`{�- I'!' • ��/�(■ .ir/ +. kj{.yy- /Y��({ {( 1J]r `1�' /�� ■(/ ' 'M ��Mf.l
'•� �, •11M�� � '1�i\�.T1•'' if Y, •��'� 1.11' ±11+.`.R'1 �•�5 1 J "..•Y •�+ �� 4i.
�.� '
'�I . VI' ICJ
i
f
If
.o:1.
l+ F=;J
IIv
±M '� I.
:
[ R.�,
.. r.. ' ''1• non: �.. J,I.' , , ��. 1� ''"� ... ,
0