HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1961-2595Resolution No. 2595
Dalseth Construction Company
Di\ FE i?E CD.::LJED
~E F. '-JlJ~NlE!?
RESOllJT 10'4 '-D. 2595
:
RE SOLl.IT I eN 0 f CITy CCUi'JC Il ~;E Tt r.~A I r..JG THE N,":C U\I T OF ','!:,'NE Y
'''lIlCH CERTAI"! P,\~CF.lS OF P;;()PEi?TY Sf-".ALL PM PRIOr. TJ :,!/lKING
SP'''ER CU"l'!f-CTlCN f1EC!\'JSE Of 3P'IEFIT ~F.CEIVEO rw SAID Pf,<CELS
gy THE CCNSTRUCTlO"1 OF A SE""E" lI'JE 0\1 East "J" Street bdween
Melrose Avenue and Gretchen Avenue (Streets!
'ly Dal se th Cons truc t i on Company
!bu! !der)
.
\'''HE~F.^S, Dalseth Construction
(3ut ider's Na11e)
to be constructed a sewer line and
Comoany
constructed or caused
dPpurtenances onEast "J" Street
~ {Streets or
in the City of Chula Vista, and
,
s u :.,d i vis ion l
''''HEREAS, the City Ennineer, on June 22, 1960
did accept
said ccnstruction as navinp met the specifications and requirements
of the City of Chula Vista, and
.
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has filed his recom'Wll1dations to
the Cily Council, in writing, with the City Clerk, setting forth
therein the parcels he has determined which have benefited from the
~
construction of said ~ewer line and appurtenances, and he has set
forth in his recommendations, in proportion to the benefit received,
the amount of money Three dollars and fifty cents 1$3.501, Vlhich should
(.,er'-front foot or per acre)
he assessed apains! said parcels as a result of said benefit received.
~,
which sum of m-ney should be paid to the City of Chula Vista prior
to any S~'Jer connect ion ~e inq made to any sewer faci I i ty of the Ci iv,
..,
to serve said parcel, cnd
\~"~.'t:EAS; the City Fnp!r1f2er, D~ h~s rflco:n'i'!~ndatio!ls) t)as asc€t'-
tained that sa,d bui Ider has incurred the cost of S 4,495.00
.,
for th. ~onstructlon of sdid sewer line and facii Ities, and
"'l-'E,?[AS, the City Enginee'r,'as part of his recommendations, has
determined that the benfZfd received by said bui Ider, hecause of 'me
construction of said seVier line and facilities, is $2,550.01
.
"'"
and thet the amount of money which said bui Ider should be entitled
to receive bv way of reimbursement for the said construction, in
"
~.'
accordence Vii th Ordinance ~o. 405, as amended, hereinafter referred
to as Crdinance 'Jo. 1105, Is $ 1,944.99
less the incidental expenses
incurred bv the Citv including enqlneerinq and clerical expenses In
I;
--....
order 'to obtain said reimbursement, In the amount of ,; 97.25
, or
8 total amount te be rehhursed to said but Ider of $1,847.74
.
~.
NJ\~:, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY FCU~J) A'-JD I,ESOLVED AS
FOLLm"s:
!. That the construction of said sewer line and
appurtenances has benefited those parcels as shown on the
plat which is attached hereto ~nd made a part hereof;
.
2. That the recommendations of the City Engineer
are hereby approved ,3nd adopted as fi led with the City Clerk,
and $ 3.50
{"-per front
s a I d pa r ce I s as
is hereby assessed against
foot or per acrel
a result of said benefit received, which sum
of money, at the above-cnent ioned rate, shall be ~,,,;d to the
Citv of Chula Vista prior to any connection being made to any
"
sewer facility of the City to serve said parcel;
3. The Mayor of the City is hereby authorized to
sign, on behalt of the Cih, the Contract, which is hereby
.
approved and which is attached hereto, which provides for
the reimbursement to said builder for the constrvction of
said sewer lIne and appurtenances, In an amount not to exceed
the sum of $1,847.74
,..', (cos.t less btZnef it to bui 'der, less incidental
, all in accordance with the pl'ovl~ ions of
ex pe Il s e s )
OrdInance No. 405.
..,
#,
00:
:
>
-2..
rlIlonED AND APPROVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CHULA
.
VISTA. CALIFORNIA, th~s_ 25th _day of -2p.ri.l, 1961
by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES:
COUNCI~N McA11ister,Smith,DeGraaf,Menze1,McMains
NArES:
COUNCIlJ1EN
None
ABS!':Nl':
COUNCIUlEN
None
,.
.
!,T.LEST:
~~"I~__ !hf
.-,- Cl"rk -r-~
..
.,
SlATE OF CALIFORNIA
CClr.-rrY OF SAN DIEGO
C J'::'i OF" CHULA IflSTA
)
)
)
S5
~
I, KENNETH P. CAllPBEI..L, City Clerk of the Ci ty .:>f Chuta Vista.
Cs - Hornia DO HEREBY ';ERTtFY that the above and foregoing is a f.ull,
true ar:d cortect copy of Resolution No.
___snd that the
..
SliDe h2$ !.lot been amen.ded or repealed..
:
DAT.ill:
,.....
City Clerk
~
Dalseth Construction Company
':':: ~:..:.r..~.i?s=~~r.~;.JT .D..~-.JTJ;.':-.CT :?t~3r'E~;-'~
JLo_1.udJL_CC..n.Lt_DJ~..LLo.lLCOiIlr" n V
t3ui ~del.i .
/\".10 Tnt C::TY Cf CHULA ViSTA,
?RC)VIDP'1C; Fer f?E I!AE;U?SE".~E~-!T TO
st.!~) 3Ul UJF R i:'J CC:-.NECT!G'J v"lTH
A P02TiO:-"': Cf THF CC;ST (}f ':C\J-
STRUCTIO:-.1 C-f CE~TAi"J FN."'.! II TIES
IN Eost "J" Str..t
ISfreet- or sut>d~vi:>ionj
This :3~r-2<O:~flei"lt .ncde and t;r.rt!red inro on ~ne :iai'€ 5:et fG{ ~h
b€!~w~ hy ~nd befw~e~~seth Construction Co.
her~ :i1&fi'ej'
cipal coroor6t~on~ h~r~lneft~r referred to ~s the City~
V/ i T.\jE 5S E TH:
'-"'HE~E^S~ sCl6 I5'Jtide;- h5-~ consrr'Jcr.zd or ,:aL'~ed to be COi'i-
stru.::}~dJ a sewei 1 i',e and c~;pIJrh~n5i1c'23
,
h'2 re il1c.,fter
YO as lIfc;ci!jties!l~ in East "Jt1 5tr(et
{i tree f .c'r
in H!\? City of Chura Vista,. dnd
r~7erreG
5undivi s iofl}--
,
'.''J-iE"EAS, on April
-l1:'aT~)
adoptee r:~soh.dicn \!o.. 2595
25,1961
,
til2 C!fy of ChU~d Vista
_~ which resohd'lon dete;-mined thc;t
the ~cnstruct!on of lAid sewer i ine and appurtendnc~s has be~~-'
fite.j ccr-tain oar':els c-f !an;j as ~h.-:.wn 0.: th-:: pi~I attacn€,j to
said ~esolutlo~, a~d
'~'H~REI\S~ se.ld n~s0[utio\1 se;' fOi'th therein (1 dErer'idnc.ti~;n
of th~ City E.np!!H:~r> oS appf'c.ved b'l t;-;e City COl'iiCii: of th~
l5mounr.:)f r,;cr:<:v WiiiC;i said ~uifd:zr :;hov\.j tz j~itnblirseo for the:
ccnstrl'ction o~ said se\'fer ~ ;ne,. in acccro6"c2 wi i'if ~he prc,'t!sicns
of vi-dinancr ;-'!o.. ItCiS:- as. ,arnoe'fldzd, he:'e ioaft..:r referi~d to Gjdinanc-s
/f05t ...- rn.z f!~tei\? thaT said sewe;' ii~e has h.znefj~'E:d s::5id Pdr'..:els
of !~!1d~ ane less the :fiCid'2r;~'cd .z:.p'2iiSes in:::'}ired ii1 connection
':1ith obtdinirlg said n-::J;;;bursei1i-2n!: i;nd
t:'."riEP.E/\S-, said Bu:ider her redd and vnd~,;}dr;d:: the pr-c-v!sions
of Or"clnalice '\ic" 4nS~ and 55!.:} R'!so;vrion ~-:';<. 259~;. and -agrees
TO e!; o~ .the provisi.ons of $'iid ord'iil;.;nce~ ff".j e.~iee5 thl!~ :::11
of
s t:3 te:r;l!r, T:;!
determinations end conctusions In said r~~o-
L'
ine
luricn ~re cGrrect,. t1nd ~e ~$ !n d.=cc,d \.dth 6nd eg.!'?2s to the
, '
cone i~ S! .)ns
cnd
fhereof:-
(oG(-osS
:..:~:~.._;
;'
r
.--'
-!:-
'"
"'Y~-,ERE.AS, said Buf !dc;r rep;,"Ci~snt.: th6r $.;id ftcil it"ies
he...e bEe.!,!,_-_~iTS-tdi !.'!G o~d vested in the C!fy, fi'2€ ,jOG cleaf
of- any d2mand from any person or firm whatsocver~ ~Kcept 5S
provided in }his ~gree~ent~ and
.\'"'H::.REAS!. it is 6f!.r.::ed b~, .:: did 8u i ide. f tJ6 t h:; ~ ie :m--
burSC"iCnr for the cc'ns~rlJcficlJ of 5fi;d Tacl iifi-€~ s;-;-:"Jj I.be
i ~m! ted T-:; r~funds col !ect'Ec pursua:ot ~.o ~ne crOi,.isfons
0., Ordlnar'::;::e ND.. tlD5;:- <di!d
w:r--;E.REA5~ seid 31Ji Ide; 6grec~ to ~":)i.j t;-;:2: Citv-:- it!
agei:t5;\ office~:: an:: .)ff;Ciols: fr'?c i;!'ld r;errl1f~Ss from {!:i~'
and af I ciclr,)s or ce;r:~:ld~ aris!ng from 0: ct;r of 0; thrc'.Jgh
t ~{e Ins t d ! I B t 10. n (1 f ! he h'Z r e ; ~ r.;;: f~ :- I. e d j-':; fee ~ i j tie s, i3 i! c1
\~!~-iEREJ\5!. the Bui Ider 6c:rees: fhe.t i{ toe -emcL!!Or coi !€cr..-
eo by ft.€' City i.c,m persons c0nnecrlng t,'J. said -i2cilifi-?s!;
who h~\le: benefited fi"om th~ cOflsh""uction of 5c!C feCt i itiES:-
::!oes nor <,:oi-nper.sat~ the crtv for the cc.~:;t of ce! !ecrio:1,
that thE Cfty mey d~duct fro~ the amnunt due to the 3uilder
- a r~dsonebie ~Uiil 0-: money to cover fhe co:; t .:>f co! !cctFcn
by the City,. and
\l'~~EREAS: f~' 1s agr-zzd tho~ the Clty sntill i'~ no C:lse
be: iable '~o fhe builder fo.. fe!ilJr€.,. !l2g1ect 0: in6bii!fy
.;or: diiy reeson tv co! leei' anv c!,:Hqe:;. h~r€ in ment I oned, ~7""-
TO reimo!..'rse rh~ B:_:iid:;r -35 n"l,q:jn p.o'Jided.... nr fer tzf'i"OrS
:r. prvpcrti~..ete d3~burS24,~nt therzois
f'.JJ?',
Yt-!EREf82E,
.,
,.
Ie- .aplec..:
~"'
-.,
o~J bef~~~n fhc pairles
h~reto th~t the Cii-y w!!! reir,lbfJI''So? 5a~d Dvi!de, fv. f-llo: <:-:<a-
st~uction of ~5~d fac~1 itle~~ i~ accordance ~~th the nrc~i3!ons
("Jf Ordin~n::--2
t-.J:.::.w
-1:}S ;
zdld ~i:$-cj;;ri':."~r'
r--!::. ~
2595 .
----'
,1;::i {. h! .:
conh-act."
D~t!d i' h ls__~~dcY of_~____Ap-ril
,
19.&L-.
C'-" v ("'Wr'" , "Ie-.
!ll ~t" ~1,;..;lfJ"",'1 ......i;... 0"
_~J ..~ ~
" );;;~< 1'<. ..J4-
BlJ! t D~ R
n"~~
::::;' '--:L.
-"" "j/ .." -----
-.2-...
"
I, R. A. Floya, Ci:y Eni;il'lter of tr,e CitJ of C/'Iulc Visla, pursuer.l l~ tr;e provisions of Ordir,on:e ~05 C$
amended .dire::i(1~ IT.e os el:y EnQineer 10 make cr.d present to :roe Cily Council of 1t1e Cify of Cn'Jlo
Vista 0 dio9tCrr. 01 :r,e property offe:ted end benefite d
in 0 portion of Ihe incorporated City of Cnulo Vista,
on tile belo.. .,nCl;fom. herewith present this document
bf tl-.e construction of sewer in "J" SiREET,
wilr.in the limi:s os more Donicularly described
fa f1'le eil)' Ccuncil. ene I 00 .,ettby cen!:j Inol
Inis document constitutes 0 true and correct dior;;rom of the property effected 0'1 said ..or II. end
improvement, ,,:nier; is 10 be aSSEssed Ie pO)' Ihe ex-penses of said work end iffipfovemenf of the time
of connection, and 11'101 soid dioQrom SI'lO"S each separate lot or pcrcel of land, the dimensions
thereof ond the relotive locotions of the some to the work done, ell ...ithin the limits o~ :ne ossess-
ment district.
, 1961
-Doted, Chula Vista, Californic: April 7
City Engineer o~ the City of Cn~lo Vista
Adopted by Resolution No. 2595, Doted 4/25/ , 1961
I. TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUC.TlON.
1101.10 l.F. a" v. C. SEWER PIPE 8 3 MANHOLES
2. PERCENTAGE
PROPERTIES
~4495.00
OF COST OF CONSTRUCTION ,0 BE PRORATED AGAINST OTtiER
RECEIV.JNG BENEFITS. 952.84 2202.20 = 43.27 %
3. VALUE OF BENEFITS
OF CONSTRUCTION.
RECEIVED 9Y PROPERTIES 8Y CONTRI8UTlNG
4495.00 J .4327 =
TO COST
1944 .99
~ 97 .25
1847 .74
/1<:.2, ,..-
S'"....:..: , i
4. INCIDENTAL EXPENSES INCURRED BY THE CITY IN ORDER TO OBTAIN
REIMBURSEMENT FDA THE BUILDER. 1944.99 J .05 :
5. AMOUNT BUILDER IS TO RECEIVE 8Y WAY Of REIMBURSEMENT.
6. COST OF CONSTRUCTION PER FRONT FOOT.
$1944.99 -7- 952.84' : $2~O':13
7. THOSE PROPERTIES NOT PARTICIPATING IN COST OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE
ASSESSED AT $3.50 PER FRONT FOOT.
a. DATE OF ACCEtTANCE OF SAID SEWER 8Y CITY OF CHULj, VISTA, JUNE 22.1960
Receipt No.
06000
ARt"lr CONTRIBUTING TO COST OF CONSTRUCTION
Date
Fronfa c;: e
Cost of Construction
Amo-unt Paid
Refund
7/20/60
~13';2.85'
$ I 439. e 8 * 96. 83
1?..,....<-<I' -7>-L'<A-7;'7i'.?~ -FV~"1!..
FOOTAGE = -i'G,.0J
'. 7
S""(iu..~~
. .-.- l r
U ~ I .-
,
657.8';
AREA
BY FRONT
TO SE ASSESSED
Rec~ipf No.
Dole
frontoc;:e
Assessment
;.; ~.fl";; F<
fc(.l;1~ ~ ~ ~
-;o~'{,.-' \st .
"'ST.". \~t~?', 9. ST,'."Dt'ST
.;.:,::::;~ d.~)> 'A
._..,~.. ~~'
\V '
I
~~
:r'.~.:
-....
1101.10 L.F. 0------
MH I
8"
ST REE
'I. C. p.
0--- _S~..~r
MH 2
_ _ --i-\-- _ _ --
r
I
1
"J"
TMH-3
I
!
z
W
I
U
;-
W
0:
'"
- -
- - - ---
- - - - - l '-.~. c. ......... T H H ; - : "". Nc. ,
I' j-'-. '. n
.f 0 J "- '. S-!..
w
<n
o
0:
-'
W
',.
r2ZJ
~
AREA TO SE ASSES5ED
BY FRONT F00TAGE
1
@
/
AREA CONTRIBUTING TO
COST OF CONSTRUCTION
Scole: 1"= 200'