Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1961-2591 . .' fF': .. ., RESOLUTION NO. 2591 . REpOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA . VISTA DIRECTING THE CITY.A TTORNEY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA TO ANSWER THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE BROUGHT BY THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, AND TO JOIN IN SAID PETITION WITH THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO ;. . THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE ~ AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City Attorney of the City of Chula Vista be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to execute and file that certain Answer to >, Petition for Writ of Mandate, a copy of which is,attached hereto, and to file the same with the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County . of San Diego. SECTION 2. That the City of Chula Vista join with the City of San Diego in said Petition for Writ of Mandate, above referred to, for the purpose of . having judgment ent~red in said cause of action as prayed for in said Petition. .' ADOPTED AND APPROVED.by.the cITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CHULA ~ VISTA, CALIFO~N~, thif? 11th ~ay of April, 1961 by the following vote, to-wit: ". I . I l I , Co.UNCILMEN McMains, Smi th, McAllister, Menzel AYES: NAYS: COUNCILMEN . . , . ABSENT: COUNCILMEN None ~.~. '-'1" 5?..&:4 yor of the Ci y f hula Vista ATTEST.:::1( ~.. ~~"'{l.. ;IM ~'Clerk . , DeGraaf - . .. I. '. . ": . .1 I. . I STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUN.TY OF SAN DIEGO) ss. CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, KENNETH P. CAMPBELL, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, . ,. California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. 2591 ,and that the same has not been all}ended or repealed. ? DA TED: April llth, 1961. City Clerk ~ " .J. ." . ~. . ;: . '" .~ o. .' ~. . I. l ~ . .. George Bean 1 ALBERT C. BOYER ATTOl'l.NEY AT LAW 29:3 THIRtI ",VENUE CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE GARFIELD 2..42.91 (SPACE BELOW FOR FILrnG STAMP Q:!Ii'LY) IN TRt: SUPERIOR COURT OF TEE STAT'E OS' CAL.IFOaNlJ\ -1- a m'.101ci;).3l IN A:\'D roE. THi:; COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO !'lO. 25215~ ANSW~R TO PETITION FOR \VRrl~ O~ .MANDATE z.o Comes now CI-ry 0"" C~mLA VLS'rA. a Real Party tn Interest In the above 32 entiUed matter, ami severing itaelt from tl:le defendJmt and the other RenI Parties 2 3 AttOrnflY for CUy of Chula Vista 4 5 6 7 Attorney {or f:'it=~ "r r-hl"l;:ll \1iet'!20 =- aeal Farty in Interest 8 9 10 11 12 CITY Of! SAN DIEGO, 13 eorparatlon" ) \ , ) I ) ) ) 1 ) l ) ) ) 1 CITY OF CRUJ:..A VISTA, a municlp!ll ) 21 corporation, CITY OF CORONADO, Cl ) mlJllic!pal corporation, CITl/' OF ;3;1. ) 22 CAJON, a muclc!pel corporation, ) CITY OF !M?ERIA;:, BEACH, a mWll- ) cipal co..~ratio!O, ClT~ OF LA ME5..l\, I 24 n munlc!pal. corporation. CITY OF ) NA110NAL CITY. a munlcl?Sl cOJ'por- ) 25 ntloa, LEMON GRO"B SA..ITA'I10N ) DISTRICT, a sanitation district, ) 26 ROLANDO SANITATION D'..ST!l.ICT, a ) sanitation district. and SPruNG VAL!.!::':YI 27 SANITATWN DISTRICT, a sanitation ; ) dlat:"lct, ) ) I ) 14 Plalntlf1. 15 va. 16 GEORGE BEAN, as City Manager c;f 17 the City of San D1ego. 18 Oefandant. 19 20 23 28 29 Real Parties In Interest 31 ....LeE-RT C. BOYER ...TTORNn AT LAW ZSl3 THIRD AVENUE :HULA VUiTA. CALIf". l.Ef't40NE GA 2_42111 1 m llrterest, in answer to ttID f'etltlon for WrU of Mandate herein, admits, ~aloo 2 3 4 5 5 7 and alleges as follows: I That CITY OF ClilJLA VISTA, . is, and at aU tlI::el3 mentioned herein was, a Municipal Gorporntto.::l duly organized and exlGtlng .uader the La'Ss of the State of Clllitornla al!d Ita Charter heeto!ore duly edopted and ratlIted, 8 11 9 In ana)O'er to. said FctUlon for Writ of Mendate herein, CITi' OJ CHULA 10 11 v roTA tidm.iu the nlh;"ge.tions contB.~.ned in paragraphs 1 to 15. inclusive. III 12 13 14 15 15 Real E'a:"ty in Irrte!"eGt~ CiTY OF" CEOLl~ VISTA, here~~ joins with. CI71(OJ! SAN DIEOO In the Petition herein for a Writ of Mandate, 3:!d ~aya that Plaltrtlff CITY OF SAN DIEGO, 1;)e given judgment as pray:?d for In Its Bald Peti".!on, 17 WHEREFORE, f1eal Party in Interest CITY OF ChvLA VISTA pro.yE: that 18 19 plaintiff CITY 0.;;' SAN DIE::?" have iu<j~ment herein as prayed for In I~ retitloD (01' Writ 01 it,ando.tl!. 20 21 22 23 CITY Oi' CHtri.A VISTlI, a .MunIcipal Corpcrat1on~ ~c. ~ 24 25 by l\lbert C. Boyer, City Attorney of the City of Chuffi ......isla. 25 27 28 29 30 31 32 -2- 25 26 27 28 29 30 311 321 ALSERT C. SOYER . . ATTORNCY AT LAW ::":. ::. 2'3 THIRD AVENUE :.:: :'"::HUl.A VIST.... CALlI". ..."1.~MONEGA 2-4291 "" """ ..... 1 S't-ATE OiY CAJ.IFOftNLAi 2 55. COUNTY' QF SAN DIeGO) 3 4 5 6 7 ALBE!3T C. BOYEil, be!n.:r!u-st duly 1;'C10rn, cieposes aM says; That CIT)i' O? CHlH..ft. VISTA in the within entttlod Action L3 a municipAl oorporation, and that affiant l.s an officer th!1:reo!, to-wit, the City Attorney, 2n~ ma!<es thIs vcritlc4tton for ~ad 0:1 behalf or said c.crporatio:l. S That ~f!1.a"1t has ::-ead the foregoing -.;:'is\\:.E:R 1'0 PETITION &'Oa \~rJT Of' 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 liI1A~,U!"TE lrerein, and /mows the cc:ne!:lUl th,,:-~; and that the same is true of hls o\'ln l:nowlecl6:", e:.:::E!;ot;os t~ tli" matters whkh are therein stated on. il]for-" mation or tidier, and sa to thQ3e matters that he beUeve-s it to be true. ALiiE<ll' C. BOYlm Al.bart CQ Boyer Sub3crlt>ed and sworn to before me this lath day of AprU, 19tH. Notary Public ll\ aDd for sai-cl County and Stat..: 22 23 24 -3-