HomeMy WebLinkAbout1969-583 RESOLUTION N0. 583
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING
TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE CHAtVGE OF ZONE AND PREZONING FOR
THAT AREA ON L STREET BETWEEN FOURTH AND FIFTH AVENUES
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a change of zone was
filed with the City Clerk on 7th day of April, 7969, Document Number 69-K,
and
WHEREAS, said application requested that the property located at
L Street between Fourth and Fifth Avenues more particularly described in said
Document, be reclassified from County R-2-A zone to R-3 zone, and
WHER~9S, the Planning Commission set the time and place fora hearing
on said application, and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was
given by the publication :.n a newspaper of general circulation in the City at
least 10 days prior to the date of said hearing, and
WHEREAS, a hearing was held at said time and place, namely 7 p.m.,
Monday, August 4, 1969, Council Chamber, Civic Center, 276 Guava Avenue, before
the Planning Commission, and said hearing was thereafter closed.
IVOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
1. From facts presented to the Commission, the Commission finds that
public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice require
the prezoning of that property on the south side of L Street between Fourth and
Fifth Avenues with the exception of four parcels fronting on Fifth Avenue from
County R-2-A to R-3-G-P (one unit per 2,500 square feet) with the attachment of
the "P'° (Precise Plan) modifying zone (plat attached). The 4 parcels on nth Avenue
shall be prezoned R-2. This ordinance shall become effective only as approved
plans for development are submitted.
2. The Findings of fact in support of said determination are as
follows:
a. The configuration of the .parcels and existing land use are
such that the flexibility of R-3-G zoning is necessary to
facilitate good development.
_
b. With the attachment of the Precise Plah, a development will
be assured that will bA compatible with the surrounding res-
idential area..
c. Since no need exists at this time;-and since the property
owners have objected, the property presently in t{ie City; will
not be rezoned: .
3. The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council that said
reclassification be granted.
4. That this resolution be transmitted, along evith the application to
the City Council, and a copy of this resolution shall be transmitted to the ap-
plicant.
PASSED and APPROVED by the CITY PLANNING COMMISSION of CHULA llISTA, CALIFORNIA,
this 4th day of August, 1969, by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES: Members Adams, Stewart Putnam, Macevicz, Chandler, and H,~de
NOES: None
Member :??Rice
T°
J
Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretar