HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1963-3212Resolution No. 3212
~ 6BSalalFslatii iva< 3I12
A &sS0113TI(l~t Oli' T[3E CITY' Ca'tm:CIL a3+ 'E8E CI3'Y fiF
CEIt11.A VIS'PA nISAPPRClVYN2G S`RE PflaVISYCzYS OP GhAPEES 6e5
Bir Pars a, nYVISYaN a, rY s a~ Tas GB~TS cans aF
THS STlaTE i3P CAI.IPORNIA, EI'fB.Fn"1.t3CAI. A.G~iCY Ai1Nli:GlTlalt
CISSYOLIA/ , ANdD DRG"ILaG 'IBS F1R9EDYLaTE REE'EAT. 2`SEREaI? 9Y
Tl'E CALIL+'aRLeTYA S.EGISIATURE
t~fiiER~S, the California l~gislaturm, during the 1963 Regular
Session thereof, passed and enacted 3eaafe 9111 `oa 562, being an act to
add Chaptcsr 605 (coaasencing with Seetioa- 5/+'~50) to Pas'agraph 1, Division
2, gitle S of the ~vera~ant Code of Lhe State of California; and
W;iEgg+19, ties Governor appsowed ssaid Senate 9i11 &o0 561 on July
17. 1963; and
WtiEltl:AS, the pravialonu of said act require that o local agency
formation csmmissioa be eatab~iaheQ.in cash county and that no petition
aeelCiag annexation of territory to a aity may be circulated or filed raith
a city, nor may a city counoil of a city initiate proceedings to annex
territory on its ac.+n motion s~ithout first filing a notice of intention
to do ao With the coaraisaioa, ~r may any further proceedings be taken
by a city or by tho proponents of an annexation, unless and amtil a
hearing has bean held by the coremiaeion:,atiai:.the proposed annexation is
approved by the said car~iaeion; and
W~P.9+AS, said cocmiasion cosy diaapgsrove any aasch proposed anneas-
ation to a aity, nhesoupoa no furShes proceedingo to anama.tha same, os
eubatantially the acme, t@gxitory fns at least one yens after the date
of diac~pprrra~al by the caaeeiaaion; .and
41fIEBGAS, two of the ffiembera of the coammisaion representing cities
moat ba messbars of the legislative body ®f cities u3thin the county. bat
said ma~xa axe diaqualiffied from participating in alas gsroeeedigga of
the a~miasioa with reapecC to a proposal to annex territory to the city
represented by said member, indicating a diatzuaL in the integrity,;; of"
tho City Councilmen appointed to said coa®isaiono
NOW, THERE.T+O$E, BE IT BESOL`tED, DETE8fi4INED AND 08DEBED sa follows:
Section la That this City Council hereby-records its disapproval
and objactioa to said Senate Bill doe 861 for the season that it takes
additional rights fry local governmental agencies and from the citizens
and inhabitants within any territory who may wish to annex to a city,
and thin City Council hereby nrgea its representatives in the Legislature,.
and all other interested governmental agencies,. organiastions and persona,
to raork £os and obtain the iamediate repeal of said lawn
Section 20 'The City Clerk is hereby directed to fforward copies
of this sesolutioa to the Governor of tho State of California. to all
r®presentatives of San Diego County in the State Legislature, W eha Board
of Supervisors of San Diego County, and to the yeageee of. California Citiead,
.PASSED, ADOPTED AND APP8fii7E0 by the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF .
CHUiI- VYSTA, CALIF~IA, this.24th daq of September, 1963,:by the follow-
iog vote, to-wit:
AYBS: COUNCIY#9EN Smith, DaGranf, ins, 14cAlliaeas.. 14enzel
SAYES:~ Ctii3NCILP78C1 ~oae
A&SBN'P• COUI~CILI~N Hope
. ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~
yor of the Citq epY n istia
~: ~/~
. ~"~ Ci q Clerk, -T
STATB ~ CALIlA08NYA 3
COUNTY OY SAN DIF.(7D D ~®~
CYTit ~ CBULA BISTA
I, EF.NAIEI'N Pe CA@lPBBIsL, City Clerk of the City of Chnln ®iota,
Celifosni,a, D0 HE@EBY GERYIPY Heat wee above and foregoing ;is a full,
tree and correct copy of Ees®lution Noe 3212, and that the same has not
boars amended or repealed,
DATED: Se®tesnb®s 24. 1963
City Clerk