HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1959-2183Resolution No. 2183
Olivewood Acres Annexation
., ;.Ir
Ii~SOLUTLON I'L= 2183
RFSOLUTI02I GIVIIV'G NOTICE OP' 2fIN Pft0:OSED
ANNERATION "ib THE CZTY OF CAUY.A OISI`A Al'ID
TIP3 CHIII.A 9IS^tA ~'~ $CH00~ DISTRICT OF
CITY ,
s'IV TIdS C OF A ~ GOB ST TE;OF e b BE IC•I6r7PI. AS
" or.r +Ft~onn ~C2ES ANj~,e,d "
TIC CITY OOUidCIL OF TITS CITY Or CHOLA V75TA DOF„S AEAF.HY RES07.~E AS i~VVI,L0:9Ss
79xat pzu~ru2.a$ to the tee asx~ ps+o43.siom® of t?~s A.t3a~u of.t3lg-
3ssbab4.tsd'~t•3.tua~ Ac~`_• tef A934a
ROTICE ~?S HGREBY. GI1T£34 of the p¢~c~sed anno~t%art to, aaB 3ncolr~cuo-
"a'~3on and 3aa'Lvsioa' 1rsD tho. Ci~~r of C@tnle P3r~ta and rs~ 'tho Chu7:a -V3,sta
city
~~ Scilaa2 D;~tita•3.cic, of cer~ ta3n za~hab3ted tasa°S.to~ 3u 'taio Cow
' ~ 7
o~ San Diego cont3tms.ous ~co tl$s C34,y' of Chtala V3s4,a'o ~ ~un:8az~los of
ttie territos~g ao px~oposod 4,o Y~ annul to tha Citgy of Qhu3~ 93stcs aa°e
~s~ .~~ Described as foila~: .
a
paw
Thaf portion of Quarter Sections i34, i35 ar.d i26 of Rancho de is
Nacion in the County of San Uiego, Sate of California, according re PAap
thc.r¢of, No® i66, made by G¢org¢ S, 'vlorrill and filed in the County
Recorder's office, "~Aay l!, i869, and d¢scrlbed as foiDows:
i< aeginn'sng at the Southeast corner of 20 acre Lot 4 of Quarter Section
i35. said Southeast corner being on the Northerly boundary nine of the City
cf Chuia V;sta;
2, Thence ~4'este.riv along the Southerly line of said Lof 4 and said City
boundary a distance of 37i.23,f~>et; to an intersection with a line parallel
ro and 3%t.23 feet distant from the East¢riv fine of said lot 4 and the
Easterly line of Lot 3 of Quarter Section 135;
:~. Thence Northerly along said porall¢i iin¢,. said parail¢i iin¢ being
also the City of Chuia Vista boundary fine, to an Tnt¢rseetion with fhe
Northerly line of the Scuth half ii/21 said 20 acre Lot 3;
4. Thence ~"'¢steriy aiong said Northerly itn¢., being aiso the City of
Chuia `Jista boundary iine, a distance of 5i0,S0 feef to an intersection
`Kith a iin¢ parallel to and 340 feet distant from the ""¢st¢r!y Fine of
said Lot 3;
S. Thence Southerly aiong said parafi¢i iin¢, being aiso the City of
Chula Vista boundary iin¢, a distance of 200 feet to an int¢rseetion with
a line parallel to the Southerly iin¢ of said 20 acre Lot 4 of Gluart¢r
S¢c.tion 135
G> Thene¢ slang said parallel tine, being aiso the City of Chuia Vista
boundary idneg a distance of 290 feet i•o art intersection with a iin¢
parailei to and SO feet distant from the r"esterly line of said Lots 3 and
4, sa+Cd ~°'est¢rty iin¢ being aiso the Center-iin¢ of Highland Av¢nu¢;
7. Th¢nc¢ Northeriv aiong said line parallel to the Center-tine of
Fiighiand Avenue to an intersection with the Northerly line of Quartet'
Section i35;
H> Thence Easterly along said Northerly tine of Quarter Section i3S
to the Northeast corner of 20 acre Lot 1 of Ouart¢r Section 135 being
also tine Southwest corner of 40 acre Lot 2 of C,luart¢r Section i34;
9„ Thence Northerly along the ``'esterly iine of said 40 acre lot 2 and
its Nor •'r herly prolongation to an intersection with the Northerly right~-
of-wav iine of 30th Street, as shown on County Road Survey 1323on file in
the office of the County Surveyor of San Uie.go County, said Northerly
Yioht•~of-way line being also the Southerly City bpundarv !in¢ of the CFty
;,• :ur.r. ract;y;•si~~ oe^•~ :^+, c. ,:oa=c-. .. e: u •~, ~ - .
J
j ~ ..> 2oh:: !.i,U: c,,;r,4 <' .'at- _.. _ c'.c~:' ~.
tiro ,i I"'' .H. .., ' .. ~
~ ~' .. .. ~
t ,. .~T.V Lev
•: ~' -~
- .. .i ~:J' ~. is _ ' i. .. ~ ." .. ..i
~~
r
~ R ~~
~~
• .~
.v.. i . i
.
' 'ghat a€sid:RbTS~1.§a3'y is hereby cies3~n&~eci e~ Olivewood Acres Annexation
v 2 .,
I
i
~4 '
I
NCTICE T3 FIIRTH'~t GIVErJ that'on't3ie d~ of Aril ~
'~~1959 , 8'L t.YtB'h613T Of 7:00 P.M. 3a 'Ed12 00181031 C~b8143
5a ttm City Ha11y Civ2c CmssEer, CtilaLa Vista, ~,Ca~.iFos~nia, at a rmaultlr »etittg
`:0.4 the City Couaci7. of said Cit'Ja ~' P~'~~ raa1. P~+Pert9 ru4,thin stidx
~,
•, V,erritory proposed to be aaxiexed aa8 having ate, ob~otians to tho pm~sed
~in~xat3,oa, any appear bsfore* the City Conacil and show osuse ~ such tsrri-
?,oay' should riot ba so aneiaxsdo
y At ai?,q. t9>De IIAt later than the said hover set for head ob~eCtia~
}J` • 0
xtA t$B.prOpOBSdaiII19.N.~i02tg all,/ 01n1.9Y Of plbpBi'~ wit213zs th8 tk'rET1.'~ry pra-
~: ~~
:posed to be~minexed ~ f3.3~ writtsn pl~test against th~i praposed avmexa-
.
,.
tiaio . 9t1oh protest shall state the nano or name of the a~.er or ormexe of
tT'iJ pa~opsrty affected #tiexeby sad the desoa~.ptioa sad aa~ea of suoh P~P4''
3a generalu termse
NOTICE IS EQR'PfII:R.'QIVFN that praceed3nga aril hereby 3nit3ated by th3
City kto181ei1 of 23ta City of C41ula Vistas; a1ar2 tBtat t~1o said City Council ~+-
s3s~ee sa9.d annexation 9.'or the follawiag seasons s '
to R`1~ 1minYfabitad tsrritosy. pr+aPosed ~. bs aped ie covit3~so1~
to the City of Chu]a Vista, ..and is the path of natural expansion of ittra
ar~id~elt$it~l. di:st~.ot b~ fhe•said' Citye .
2e ° The_said City Couno3.1.' ~sfres t3s~ detreloptmat of this vs~ll3riha6d.4m~
tesrltnrya so Sar as possibles to c~aform t4 the standards establ#.ehed
by .mss suhdiv3.sia1'is ~ sauitat3.on building oazl9siavieeb. of the City of Chula
V3ataa .
.. 3 m
,, ...
,~ _
3. The said C33;y Counoil desires fo' prevent the dewiopmmat o£
snb-standard Rfri~" areas along tom. boundaries of t2io flaid City.
$:
HE IT F'U RESOLVFJ1, that the Gity G1eT1c of said City be, aliil "
., he ie hereby directed to causes copy cf this Resolut9.on to be published
'~.
at least twice, but aot oftener than anal a wea2c, to-~viti Ors the ez tri'Y
day of FebruarYL 1959 , slid on the 5th day o~
,~
~ Dfarchi y 1959 „~,,,,,, ~A t11@ 'GhtLlt3 V38ta Star, a HBW'3+
.paper of genoral airculat3on published in said Cit,,Y,Send also ia•a newsy
~ paper a~, genasc°s2 c3rav3.atiran published cutsids of tIib City but in the
Camr6y in v~ioh is boated tine territory psoposefl to be;anna~adg said "
puhliaation to be coatplste at ]seat 20 days prior in_the data set for the' ".
~~
~';i::
Said City Clerk shall alsocause wrstt~ notiota of such proposed';^i`~,`
'>
anneaaticn to be mai7ssl to each parson to w21a~ 7.axad `within t}le ~ters3.taky~ ,",
pmgosed to be amsexo3d is assesses 3sa the last equa]3.~ed ouisaty.asaessmen
,. },;,
roll" avai3ahld oar the dots theme proc~edin~ ar8 initiated, at they adda+ass
shoisn on said assessalent roll, or ae knar,2s to said C3Ardc, and' to a»y "passr4~
I, ;
who hats P`1).ed his riamz and address and the deaigpati~an of'ths lands iii which
' he has may interest, oithep Zegal or equitaWs, with said C]srk.. In, 4tfe ;
event atiy Zend within the tsrrlt~sa*,r praposefl to be asind is owned bjI tk~s
County of San Diegti said City Clerk 8h311 also cause writtazi nota.oe ofsucla
proposed a,-inea~t3ii~ to be mailer to the F~aa~d of s{pervyaors of auoh ~wmty.
Thg notices above referr~+d to ~liaT1 be given, not Asa than 20 days bmPore
4kie said publ3,o ~aegring on the ~aroposed annearatiorie
ADOP`TED' SZD~'AND /4'BPROVED.this ~~, ~ ~ February __ a
1959 0
~. .,
r c e C o a isle,
California
'~_,''
~ _ '~,
ATTESTS ~`~ ~ - ..
--~ 'Y _
°y_ !
+ ''
~. .
_ i
-' m '~, lY
m ~ e
i
i
sTATE of cA~xFQraarA ) . ,
CQUN2Y OF SAN DIECC ) es.
CITY-OF CHULA 4ISTA )
I, KENNETH P. CAMPBELL City Clsak of the City of
t~txla 43sta, DO AERELxY CERTIFY that t~ foa~8oing Resolution wa6 duly adapted
by the City Coima3l of the said City axed was applvva$ by the Mayor of said
City at a 29agular meeting of said Council held on the 17th char of
February ~ s ~$"~ sand that it was 8o adopted by
the fol7.o~aing votes e
AYES::•---. CQUNGGTLtE4N DeGraaf. McMains. McAl iste~r°~S~,~th.Menzg:
NQES° CQIINCII~Td None
ABSFNTs CQUNCIT,b1EN None
~~
. -.
i Y 'mss
~` 'g California
., t ..
~y,.J c
STATE UE CALIJ
COUPITY OF. SAN
CIl'Y OF CHSR.A
i
of Chula Vista, CaZ
is a full, trae end
same hoe ant been
DATEDs~~
88•
e
~, City L3.erk of th0 City
CERTIT~`Y that the abovo: axid foregois~
of Resolution No. ~ tti that the