HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1959-2161Resolution No. 2161
Brown Annexation
AESOI,UTION r~. ai6i
JtESOZtrrloJr aIVINC ~roTICE ®F ~ rroPOSJ~
AT3h7NYATICN Ta-THE CITY QF CHDLA C'ISTA AND
TfL' CHCTLA VISTA ~~ SC,HOOL DISTRICT 8fi~
~1 THE C CF J ~ CQ~ '~S' iC CA d SC' R4'Ci°!N AS
s0 L'ROIdN ANNEXATION '~
Tf~ CITY CO~QCIL OF THE CIlI CF CHCLA OISTA 770ES HERF~BY RESOLVE AS FC?LI,Cf.95~
~., .
7'Stat pm*stawt •to ttt~a teTrms and p2+ov3,e9nns of tho Antte~fi.3.on oY' tbtg-
3~t4taliited ~~°r3.toayr Ac$: • of 1939 e
NOTICE IS ~ ~ t3TG~N o4 th2 ps~oposed tiara to, atzd 3neos°por~-
atioa attd inclss~e3on 3n, the City' o~' Chula V3,ata mmnd :in fibs Chula Vista
c; T . ~Sehool DIAtl3c~., of ces~eaiae uttieu'tab3t®d. ts~ri.'Eo~ its •~ CotutrGy_
of Sa:t •Diega coaeti,~ous to tT~ Cifiv' of Ctau7.ca. Vista. Rya ha oE'
tea°t~'Staz~I so p~apased to ba ~amtsx~d to tIt® C3~ o~ CIi31m Vista asst
mote part9.ctaT.arly dasca~lbed as fb].la~ s
~•~, m
A17: that unincor[~orated area situatdd in the-CoLnty of San Diego, ;;tats ®~' Califoa°aria-,
described as folloras:
la Cammencing at tho NorP;hwost corner of the Southey®st Quarter of Quarter Seotion
9h of tho Rancho de ]a Nacion, according to 2,Pag~ thereof, AToo 166, filed in the
office of the County Recorder of said San Diego County;
20 thanco r~sterly along tho Nartlt line of the South P€aZf of Quarter Suction 9l1,
a distance of 26l~0 feet, mare or Less, to .the Northv~reest earner of the South~ost
Quarter of Quarter Section 89; ,
,~~ ~thenco F!asterly along the kdoa°th .lino of the Southwest Quarter of Quarter Section
89, a distance of 132.0„00 feet, mores or less, to the Northeast corner of the
South~rest Quarter of Quaa~tor Suction 89;
tso theno~ Souiy?:erly al®n!;'tha ?;ast ling of the So~lttra•ast Quar~tor of Quarter Socti„n
EP9, a daEStan•Yc~e~e Goof 132000~0~yf®eat~ morn or less, to tho So~athaast aomor of ~Lh3
v alltP~:GSt C>,4tc}rtGr of QtF.~L UVr o5. FiToSJion 89;
5~ iahonc¢a 1lost;orly along vhe Sou;tit line -tharoof, a distanco off' 1320000 feat, 3rore
*r loe ~,, i;aa •vhr~ Sout,P~r~st corner of Quari;er Sectio~a 69;
6o thanco Ft`e~;eferly alfti2g 'vho South `~.ind of Quas~er S~o't:aon 9~~ a distanco of :P.980e£3Er
{Feat, mors• ar lass, to tho Soui,'ta2,ep~*„ oornor of lieu Southeast Quarter of t13o Sou"th~
>aest Qsaarter of O,i:artoa> Sootion Sts;
7o thanco Alos°~hoa•1y alarg the t';est line of th® So*atheast Quarter of the SoutP~ceest
Esuartor of Quarter Section 9~a, a di.staraco of L$Oe00 .foal, maro or loss, to the
PIorthaast co;:~rxoa° then^a.af;
S~ thonao ti'=astorly along the South 1d.ne of thn Nortk.st Qu-~rtar of tFaa Sout!~ost
Quarter of Quarter Sdct:.oza 9l~, a distanco of 660tOCi taut, uoro or less, to tho
F:'est lino of Qrxartor Section 9Pl; '
9a thence Nor'cherty along tita eYest '!.ins of Q~aX~rter Soctian `I1a, a distanco of (a60~Ct0
feast, rr,o;•a or loss, to tho TF~UF PO~~Y OP t3ra'sZF~dIP.Om
That, `aR3d Tarr4tory is hereby ~rsigaated as Rroxni Annexation
~2-
~,
NCTICB IS FUR'PH"R GIVEfd that on tits', 2~tti, da3r of ~ebruary i
:~,*;'{:. 1',QSQ f at tt~ 8owc of ~• r.;.," iu the Co~moil (~aimtie~
in the City Hall, Civic Centres,, Chula Vieta~ California, at s regular ~ti.ng
of the 'Cif Council of said City ~ person awning roa7. piiapartS' w3.~iin auc~
~r3,torq proposed fn ~ annexed ~d hav2ag say obi®etions to the proposed
',atut3.~s ~Y ePPe~'-Fore the Citbr Council anct shave cause whir sash terri-
tory should not ~ eo .
>.
At. any -tires sot later than the said ho~a set far hearing ob~ectiaa~s
'to the gst+puaed. aane~tiana ax~y owner o~ pa~aperty saithizs the tsrs].torY Pro-'
posed to be•anaexed*uuay Y31e wsi~ten pYOtest agairmt the praPosed etmexar
franc. Such prat68t shall State the name or names af'tho owner ar owners of
I ='
th~ plvpssty affected t8~sebY sad the description and at+aa of such pmpc~xrLY
iii general tens.' '
' ;'~ are heseiiY init3~tad by th8
N~TICI; IS ~FddRTfli:R GIO~ that proceedings
;'4 ; i. !
City',Coimeil of .the City of Chula gists, sad that the said City Couaoil de-
~iree 6"aid an,tion for the following seasons
1. .The uniahabitad territory p¢vposed to be aisid ie coatignous
to the .City of .Chula Dist~i~„and ie- the. path of #h6 netural expansion o£ tom
residential•distr2ct of the said City.
2. The said City Council desires th» ~geloPa~at bf thia iminhabitaa$
tersitorys ao far ss poeaib]ti~ to conform ~ the m~efiandards estahlisdbed
by 4he subdivisions sanitation tu'td bui].diag ardinancos of the City ~ Chula
Yiata.
_3m
3e The said Citi9 Crnmoil desires to prevent tip developr¢~nt of .
sub-etemdasd ~Sq'inS®" areas along the tso~daa3es oY the naiti G3tVe" : '
,}
BE IT FURTHER RESCLVRD, that the City Berk of said City be,~~d :;
.:.,
he. is hereby directed to cavso a Dopy oY this Resol~Lion to he putxtshed ,
at least ~rioe; but mot oft~er than 03103 a week, to-~ritt (~s the ~ 22nd
'j
day a4 T....~: a=°-~ 1959 o sad on tI~ 29th dss*~ Q~
~, .'
in the Cd1t37.a Vista Star, a ~ .` ~',
Tanuarv, 1959 a,
paper of ,General circulatio3i published in said City', and also 3a a seer`s=,
paper oY gametal cfrevlatian published autside~oP the City but in the ''` ,
Comity is which 3a ].oca~Fet1 the tex:d.tor~r proposed to be annexedg said~~'. ~~;~ ,
publication #,o, be complete at least 2C ~ priar'to the date 'seL fot;tYlai ,
hear3ag. .
~;,, ,i
Said City Clerk shall also eaves written notice oS' such pmPased:.,~,;.
,.
amlexation to be maile[t to each parson to ~t1om land within the 'territoaiy
.,, ~,
proposed to be annexed is assessed 3n the last equa]:i.zed ~ISi1ty asaessmanSl .
i;~;
roll avai7ab].e on the data terse pzvoceedin~ are initiated, at the adct$ese
i~
ehoam an said assessment roll, or as lmostn to said C1ork, and to a3r$'pe+so3~i
who l3as fYled his nay and address and the ~signation aP the laalds iii nf11Cb
~..
he has any inter89t, either 7sgal ar equitable, with said Clarko Iaf, tie:
event any land within the teTSi.'Eory progosed to be anaeaed is awned bjF'bhs
County of San Diego said City Clerk shall. also caun~ written notice o£ ouch
Proposed anuexat3:ao to be mailed to the 13oarvi aY Supervsoora of such County.
Tt~ notices abov~i referr°c+d to gall be givaal not lase than 20 days bePate
the said pub1.io hearing on the proposed anr~atio36
ADOP2ED, STCNED Aldtl d'pPR.CVED this 13 CIaY off' ~a~tt~rv 1 ~5Q ~
o .. ~ - ~~
t t e C u a iBta, .
CaliYarnis
~'
;- ~,~~
~y may'-"`" `"' .~ . _ , ~a
,:,, ,~~
°~ ''~
~~``
~~
,~ :~,
STATE OF'CALIFCf¢ILl ) +
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ' ~.
CITY OF CHiTLA VISTA )
I, K NN~~Ii P CAMPBEb+L , Gity Clerk of the City of
Chula Vista, DO NII?1;IIY CERTIFY that tha foregping ResoluEion was duly adopted
by the City Coiaiesil of the said City and rues appsA~d by the tdayor of said
Cityy at a regular meeting oP said Couuoil held on 'the 31 th d&Y oY' ..
.Tan~xv ,~lni59 s 8~ that it was. so adopted by
the follaRr3ng vafes s .
AYFSs,=. COUNCIII<'I+N.~.~_F~ rani Mc~{ ins ~y3„StE~~m;+h enzgl
NOESs COUNCIL~BFa`t ,one --
A&SFSiTs CflUNCILbIEN None - --
s 'r, r...n y n ~
California
~> ..
,~,'. -r
,.
STATE OF CALIFORt1IA ) - . ~, ~>
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss. - .
CTfY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, KENN~IT r°TAPB~„~,~ ,City GLerk.of the~City"
of Chula Vista, Cali~'ornia, DO I~REaY CERTIFY that the above and Foregoing
is a full, true mnd correct copy of Resolution No. 2161 and that the
same has sot been amended or repealed.
RATED: + °
Gi ~ otr`3ie y o i s
Califarnis.
~,' l
. y_ .. ..>
Approved as to form by ~'`~` .
_ _ ~~
• _ ~; ~ .
,~: ,¢.
- .~
y e ity. of ' ``,
Chula Vistas California