Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013/03/19 Additional Information.~. !~ ~ ~~. ~~.~~ ~~~ ~~~_~ SISTERS IN ARMS Date: Thursday, March 21, 2013 Where: Southwestern Community College in the Veterans Glen (Located across from the Academic Success Center) Time: 11:00 am to 12:00 pm Description: To honor all women in the Armed Forces both past and present for the sacrifices they made to protect our country. Guest Speakers: Ret. Army Cpt. Sarah Oury- President of the San Diego chapter of The Association of the United States Army and a Proclamation presentation signed by the Mayor of Chula Vista Point of Contact: If you have any questions feel free to email the Student Veteran Organization at southwesternvet@gmail.com ~~.6ic~~evfs - CLfhlyi/t U~9-len~z_scr'/A-: ~~~ ; ~ ~,~~~ -~~~,~,~'~ f - A~ ~~ .~ TL 6910 PROJECT ~~~~~ ~1~ 3V ' ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~ § ~. 95 4~ Overview Map -ir ^ ~ Y L 1 J•c ~ ~ 1 '/ ~f r~ ~ 4~vPiy, 1LC 1 f ,7~"/~ ~`' Y ~E f~~,~k ~"f+'°~:;5?~ ~. r ^a~ ~! -. 6nn GttbM #, { ~ ~~~., Llmoh Grovc ~,"'G}t YI ' "~ '6 '' w 2,e' ,+.vr t z 6M[fru, s„+NN""1 ~ '~ ~-arS p+ r~-n ~ .fit ~`~ 3'n~t~>r los'~..i1L~ "'7kfik " '~ ~ ` 'San Dlego yLa Presa''~lxuuL f~^ r ;U .~ z ,d ~ S ~ A7 ~~; ~e,~al}r~.{~aly,~ z 5 v '1r_.d xr~L ,p,- .£d ~ m ". y${~~'~`~,~c.~ '"E? ~ %° ~4'+ t R< ~ ~l ! I{ ' 3 r ° ~ ~ ~ sr~ t ze YV'~{~ ~s t ., ~' ~jl'e I r u" tie ~ A~ ~ a 1 y ~ L ~-m ~yt4 ~ z ~ ~ AN m~'W vr^ ,r, > s~ l': 'p,ab`e+~T ~ ~~~ ~ ~' ~~'. .esly ~ I P ~ S ~3 } Y~ Y~ [~0.aµ,.~, ~hU~d Sld i ! rrJ ' V u^;. v *r .~ fi. .c C31 ~ 5a ~^"" ~d'-ti ;•t irT % SG ~ d ~ 1 1 I ~ ?~ s "''.. ~ ~~~~t( '~! A~..a..~~'i~"`^,.k ..za~E:.'~ x Piax ~ ,P v.e'. ,wK. 3 '~ ' " 7~'.,y~,Y'~a.'.. '~y ~ .h"+ ~'vr~~~ ~~ ~ "$k1P x `=~yr~ "d .~. ~ Ptn~ W 3 3 t 3 Y S ,~ i.. „iX ~, e- P't'Y2'~ R~~""+- r~^"G'{ i-~' {~ P A I fit/ M Lfl `L M .AbO (, f" `' ^*..~'+s. ~'~+`~'.~ n0 f t ' "` #~ ...~ ¢PCrPr Smlev ntl:~.... ~"~,~>e:, i)t s'tm 01GCn7p°E:m celwnz/cur ,~~ y .~~'°S,R ' a w y.'; ~~.x,-~' "+x~nX~'x,.Se c4,S nt'..'e' ",~`?a~r '"u ^~t ~~41t~.wi ,;llmtRUx.!sAeys^ z r ~~ gyp: ~i ~',.~~~~C ~ .~~ s; ~~ r. x.iU ~. ~~~k ~ ~li"~' ~ ~"~ a^ jI' ~ w ~ mot. {: ~, P e i'' qNy ,, -e v ~ e fo-w g,3 \r-rs Y7 +£'s5, s. 'x. S 1: ~,~'~,~'Y~~ ~ ~ D_•y,~„1..£cr~''a'5~. ~~~ ~'.d~l ~^'~'1 #'~~~~.]".,a t '~~ ~ .~1E ~pq..F~° jr,"~ja e tl! ~, ~~ • k:..< ~L.-~ ,_ 5 "I-,Rr`z` ,~~ zv i ,V { -.-'.' r ~~ {~~'. .-~.~A q +'rt.P `~T {e! ~ f.; , " ppr, ,, '' / *`•`>'„ ~^t`urt'#t ~ ~113F>~° ~ t "`v i fi 1 ~ ~SpA°k~ p,...,};`-) ~v1 r~e9e t ~ '( ~,re "}};'ri tw`'Kr~ -,...~..yyY+ ~+1~ ~&.~,, flc ~ :tl(~~~r~ s}'OL ,. ~re..~:.. ~ ~ S 1 ,' ~+~'~L. ~iAY L~~b~1 ~., ~ r!`"` ~Y') t l ,'ry,~°' 'F! '~ ,~ s E~~~~'~S-A~~~ ~ ~ k f,~-` ~ ~ , x/FiY~p.~~~~ B}`L-~r~~ ~"'~"'"~~ r ~r.,""~rr.'~'~~~J ~i SS` ~ ~sw«.,~~~)} y~7k' '£"L>B~Fv'"'a' ~'F ~ a~ ~~~a~. "~i` Crtj Y.,r ~e „~s.y~ 3` `wf a-.n i uW ~lG<"l~'r~t ."~ 1''~` as'"'° a h t.a*~' .+f"d ~'` -r1 , a`^ ~p4 ~ 1~ e. .G-_9~ ~/ '^~. ~ iPy a.>.~~`, ..fi s%> ,~ `y; ST ~ e8ron tfi s !f k A ~'",a ..:n 4x f 4. ~ .yG~/e #a~..f t ~ ~ F `~} yr ,.:' -f': ^ rp sl /C~i~4N' dry~~"~x r++..~o„ y o C ~' ` .i" V Y ~~ "fJ5 `M~ ".../' f~ ,` O~ '~ t ~ CIVi 3 tiZL P 7 ~ TNY $ ~ ., ~N' n~Al yP~ 4M1V i~i~:.s'w'~~i~.,e+' x~,1~11~~ Axw cj~7+'"f~1 ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~e^~`~~9npa D'Y ..4..,~. 3..~_,~ I xtl .~~: c"~a4'. tfi $ ~4 ~ v4"'~e~ "`', 77,yc. 125 { i4. ~ > Y ~3 ~ 2 ~, '~\ `';`~~ ~` 1 _. k {! p v v/ ,~c u u} '~ u =m` tlz .,, d { - Y cw .,an n r 1 7 ~ ° d a5 4 -~ zl ft:,J a 5j~:~'* '# ~'J~w! ~~"~ ~ rfw ra ~~#~r~ wE 5 J~n \ y{ ~ ~' ~ fit l„n,°l"L ~x~ .{.Exr~ 1~ie-^F ,pn 8"' // ~ a~~,"1 ~,{}y +1^ !~G f~tl ~ ,` ,'~} ~~.c5.1'~}s~l~jyiz SSSx '~ =' r i~ b3 E''p~Y' ~. 'uf y~oT ~{ ,.. >~n~P ~ ~^ ?f~ r ~a'S~'~„~ c f~~k(('N\ y, p~"* 'ri x{ Jf t t^3 `Yf~yx'.7~C~~i;¢~It y1Yy ~ ..., 1. yyv W A'bbS" q' ,~ M '~}: D SS tIIIl V+ i ~` ~'~ S'~ 'E ~ C A ~ N~ 3'IAF ~`: RI' .I~YlIx~Gyy~ i t" '~«a+, 1 ~~F'~^'F ~~~i C.E eI'"r u. ~4 ~ 6 ~~ ~~! ~M1+~a~'r,.4 ~~ E~~~ ~~~ ~' '..~~e' arv 9.~f ~~ ~ ~ a~ ~ r g~~o~, +43'^F'n'~`f~ 'a ( r «a`rx ^t'S~ + gt n ,.+x ~ sue, £~?i r `~~.~ 55':L')7frd YL~>"~~ ~k ".. .:rt~~~°1 ~~ Iss~+ ~ it 'A~~~6~"" x~'t. as'~. "~,JS ,~"x .i~~^'hfp~~~ y~ ~ `*-- r `t ~;. f5..v3' $`~#, P„ 0 7~ #a -,.~ o '..., r i a ~4 i L -+Yh+ t g~ o s s O?r' a #.~L+ ,~ f '{gfpr~~`~y, ~ ~ Jy1)~`&'+f, nP°~¢y{.+rgr,"~ i~ { s4 Q0.. V+K Ty F. c: y ~~ ~~`,f 'e~dW O eX~~'~f l Y~t'%,y~ Er .. 'Y '*F« ^[.~' p>Y^e"~t[~3 .`Y~t ^' v.'{S~'~p'4,'~i~ 4~ 'a, "w; /.r+t. .L+~d°. i f Py ~~. q ~[~ St~ {~~&.ry/"'(l~ l~Q.q~, {3?~~'^" ><~ k.:e. ~+~' y ~4 y.W3 6[ . ., GRP'}~` "W!~ N 1fl.w xy«s ff~ pw~ yl?~K f „^-,y~ ~~P Vki~~~~?~~ ~'tr~ .Y ~ r ~' l~t~le~~'~ ~ 4 . 1•E~E , ": i~~~pme ~ po ~' {~r Y` ,.. F pia s,y > x j2,~2#>? -t ~~ * "~i l~, a"`^ k r~ ~ a Y i~ >"'A*, ~ F's '. ~s4 t. 1~ T~ t.. + o `' T '`~` I R Lo nY dy r W o4^' °.,~ b~f.1. ~ .-cR$'~ ~" tld r n2?l~ y.e v' y ~ ~x~tiSpC o~m~+I°. r ~~ ~ * ~ i) a eL Vb' s ~Y ^r$[~~1~S~bgti+'r v$x A~.~rrnr~ ~, u'"'^.,+,, e~`x t7~u~iTJ x ~, €+.~. ~ y` yr•'~.e y o~< ~ r ifs {'. }p y~It 'P~1 L tttY~ 3Y~+` "~N:°-.:'"8~C9.~t`~'n 1 t .t~lr~+ ru 1 Rn ~'~ ^ll~~ a'7~°F ~' +j '.ytx~s,~ y' p r ~-, L~~ v V v s ~~; M 'Y ~~ •n ``'~~~~.~ ..A+M""^ «~+ ~.".',"~'`'.s~`~fl 7. ~` ~~y~~~t,a'~~~tiM~.r":.. ; ~ t~ *€'~~ '~~~is ~ ~`rd^``v ~ ~,~. a~"+~,t 7.~ r c ~~'~ ~ , i .' ~ ^"m, ail z ~P x . x ~ x ~ ~4v'"4~Lr' i s ~, ~ ~~{Q ~ 3 Z „rw. 1 e 3 z. >nE ~.>~'a "', s4 ,. ,~ ' „ J-`.~c tea af# . ~.+~ ~,° t ~ w*.. ,. ~ g~">`-.. S. .n rump Lr,~" ~b'Er .^pr ~'. a-~ I ., ,f ~ '7 , ye ~ `~ r u~_N r ~ S-~ `sv 1 Y 9 "~ .',n i ~~.. ~~ "`'~P,i 3")w 9 +? k~~, t cp'r .. ~ ~ ..i ~ Y ~ d P`R h! ~r ro ;< 1 ~' ~"'~ r ~ aa,rC 'u a ~- a~ ^ v ~ w ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ " ,ru~'x E "~+. , ~~~.° a ~ irk Av A rr ~. s ~ Sr ,i .: "x"` tiY '~ ~. `~ Gurrl de0 ~, P & .~~r~ d*ul F, ./ ~'. ~+ Iq/F ~s+~ p.f f .~ ~~ J $ I.OwYY PN ~: h' h "w~i `rL~ b #' -A'.9"Rr l .r^ I'° P rz} 'R ~ { i Y ~ 4- Vim'` ~ .1 yt~_` ~s5~~ i _~ d lwi,Ri r<~r+ (.Y' x' ft ~#2y. .~ li ,. f e.,~ a.e p ye Z yy, x2' .," ~' ,; k?`f p ,,.# ~ M R~# 4 ~ ~, .. 'i . IY r'~ti_ ary >y ~,s { F `yA g xua'~~~ ni ~~.~+~se'^^: 1 x~:tk ~tth >rff ~y~ ,r. .rg f c f ti. a ''Y~ / P;~,a ~~+ > X6910 Project °~ ~~` ~ ,.,.-~ ~ + '~-,~ `~ ~ t~,x n k'J ~ ' e °. F r ~Lr, r'+ ^'' r a ~ ? 1 7k r fA.~,~ A f1 _ rrrr~LLLLVVVVV . fN~ ~ :.. 1V' 41k < ,~jw*'"+ „~ ?MAIN Si~'`zY rt _, t s :;;~ ~e R z-. ?'~ _ 1 5 iY tiF~W . A ? ~ .~ t ~ e ~ s + 1 a , . ~ `~ Version Dete: J11912g13 N ~d Fib } l; ~ I,y _} s ; ~ a v `~ )1 ~ x~ ~+„ # " 1 cn aaool el vS 1 c S 4 ~w^^ ~~ ~~1 $ @11 x15 05 A ) """"9~y a ,~ y;,~ q n A~*N "3. ~ * `m{ ~s ` ~)w^"^L3; v loot ~ 15 "~{ F>8 r'f.~~~ ~~ { G' r r ~`~,a ~+ ~ ~ krC2}~ SDG&E Is providing ibis map / ~C ~' ~ s`~ i} ~ r'S ++{{ with the untlers[antling that the ~', ,,. +",~ }}} R o map Is not survey g2Ee. - ~'^"~ «x~'NS ~ L .~f!~vi "# ~~ •~Senlpra Lm r6)'v~r% ~~.~ ~.r...,.-.Ite.~ Ro'.u °`+„ ~ 4su ert Rafk• ;I ~,. C2aled by d'.vveRZ T~ °' ~ ~. ~?{', Requested by Bed Carter ~+ ~' '; ~ iF M.1F,yee15\Wootl to $Ieo11M%051691020150519 6910 P YI Ie1Me.mwtl Z 117 a 1 " 3 rr t tjj N $eu[[es Ntllana Geopeeptl'c ESRI51,[e M` +S, %o- f.au 1.... Y+ . .1 ~1 ~ I ~ ~` We, the undersigned are residents of the Treviana at Lamas. Vcrdes and Monet development in the City of Chula Vista. We are aware of [he proposed South Bay BRT project being proposedby SANDAG. We ' are iir OPPOSITION to the project on the following gromtds: Q the current plan calls for SANDAG to wedge a two or one lane bridge between the Treviana developmem and the adjacent Monet development; 2) The bridge will have unreasonable and negative impao[s upon the Treviana ahd~Mohet developmeut in the form of noise, air pollution, vibration, visual impacts aril reduo[ion iu properly value. SANDAG has released a Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Soudr Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project The release of the Drag EIR has a 60.day public review and commentperiod ending March 29, 2013 hr which we find bmreasooable to review a 559 page report. We DEMAND that the City of Chula Vista exercise its SANDAG votes to EXTEND [he REVIEW PERIOD for a minimumrof Six (6) months in which to provide SANDAG with studied hipucin support of our OPPOSITION. Tlds petition is being submitted to Mayor Cox, City Counsel members and the SANDAG Board of Directors to DEMANDthat they take action consistent with this petition and SUPPORT our demand to reasonably EXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD inwhich to properly respond to the SANDAG South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Projeot. J J J v J V/ V J Ut v~ r nmo Rcuemna f y 73 TiAtirJ1 t (E GvI . .Nmn~ _ ~ Y~,kJ .cJ __ Addrcs' L:~.~~w _,SLS,[""~ tw X9/_3__ sie~ama>s ~ recurc.ma -~~ urv C'kG,~.ll~t Ues/~/.P 9f 93' ]. Pnnl ~ R.cadmu _em.~e~t~ ~~iS~e---- -- ~dd,_. ~ ~j r~~~u~ ~ ~ ~- - ~; / iH'in~ Ranida~ N~~ J~1S ,~ ~1 )( nda~..,ULL-1C--~~/~1~~ ~/l ~l'~Ci _ Regn.:wa u~y _ zip ~ Rc amp a a i 1 aq ~va ~~it~~~~~41 ~VZP1j Q'~ crv /~~y ~' l~("l{al~n ~~(''0 Y ~~j 1 S. Print Resida,u Name J[ t_ Address ~ f siPnsnrtu Rwv.aee ~ ,n:Cc.. n Z~~`1 ~y ~ZsJ )t2 (/iJi-L~. ~P~ ~'~,~j~ a: inim y C7 Rcsmenm _ Nwnc rn~ AJJiaaa C 1 // ~'' Siymtwcu ~, Requested ~. ~ City ~I ~ 5~ UP ~ I ~i ~ 3 f ~i I - ' dmre ~ 14 ~ r R S6 Inm ve [ /L}{ Rw nW t..~/ Ci ~'(~~~~~ ~~+.~~~~ ZID II~~~~ n. P'~J _ R 'drnw ~_p v Y~Q/3 LJ~/t~slC c nee,e.. ii ~i ~--C c1 ~9/i9!'/'L r/~C~,/j _ _-~_~_~------_._.__.___-_.~C C q ~1ed ~ Grv 2iP N ~~+~~{v~ 1 tP.,q .z, i>`~. h.}~V~sl."~d /s~~"`'~'r~ ~~&I-AAA__l.,i~., J. iz=~~.. a w I ~ ..~ sled Requc / I CI)' ` V~a U \ GP ~..1' 4 ~~ `~ \ x_" .. S~~waz ~~~f ~{ ) ft 4 tcJ 1 C rv /' ttV L~- V (.~J"fy~1 !iP - `\~~ l__.i IQ f 1 ~, 1 i i 1 I I l I / We, the undersigned are residents of die Treviana at Lamas Verdes and Monet development in the City of Chula Vista. We are aware of the proposed South Bay BRT project being proposed by SANDAG: We are iu OPPOSITION to the project on [be following grounds: 1) the current plan calls for SANDAG to wedge a~two or one lane bridgebetween the Treviana development and the adjawnt onet development; 2) The bridge will have mrreasmrable and negative impacts upon the Treviana uid Monet development in the fmm of noise,.air pollution, vibration, visual impaots and reduction in property value. SANUAG bas released a Draft Environm"en[al Impact Report (EIR) for [he South Bay Bns Rapid Transit (BRT) Project. The releasenf the Dra$ EIR hasa80-day public review and comment period ending March 29,.2013 m which we find unreasonable toreviewa 559 page report. We DEMAND that [he Cily of Chuta Vista exercise its SANDAG votes to EXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD for a minimum of Six (6)'monthe in which to provide SANDAG with studiedinput n, supportof our OPPOSITION. This petition:is being submitted to Mayor Cox, City Counsel membexs and theSANDAG Boardof Directors to. DEMAND that theytake action consistent with this petition andSUPPORT our demand to reasonably EXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD in which toproperly respond to the SANDAG Soutfi Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Plnject- Y J J J a 1. wml // ~~~, (('" e~siam.< / 5' /~~ _.~ ,+ N-_1.~~~.1~~__ uarc-.ll~~_.ClJ%~./1 /ii/ils=/1 Cr ___ SiY~amrt u ./ Rniryaslna Clry z~P 2. Fnm kedaenw Name -~ 1 ~ /4ldmvv c/ (~ ~ \ ~ _ hG.V~ - ~_C~1~ --~~.3_.~-.~h.ik'1t_SD._ SLR-. sle~.d~,r ~a Raqucsmd Grv ` ` ZN V 1, 3.RNl ~ 2vsidcna ) \m~ve /~/ 1/ V~ Addeese /~G~ ~' ~~MA.~'r'ld___ L ?'~° 6ignemm vv RcquvscJ / -~~.Ciry C~t,~~d VS S~~iJ (vl'..I`A'P / ( / l r Rveldenm -d. PFlVt Nwnv A zl/V/E!_--~rcAIT C).N ~ Adarcce {6~F / (~1iWJN/T6 ZHRGO~FL _ ._---- -- - -1J Cry si~om~i.+a xwvuiw _-„~ Lo /~ /t C"c/%%I VISTA ~fl?/,~ s. nun -/ ~r~,i Rnsiam,a N.m< AdJ,.:: /5 r{7_G?M/.~/TU _1~>RRRG6 ;A t~Yr%N ~P'n" I _- _ - ____ 5~a~m r qu~ma~ Grv i~o c-Hv-.9 v/srP 9»~ 3 6. Film 1~ ///' Rosidovw ~^ S / - /•~~ Nomo-JC L~~_.i_- V~S rS~ A~erus--~2._/!-. `~SGLt.~f-=~~0 F Yi~aWmus~% / / aow,alw4 alY C.- ~G/<o •f tie ~ ~ /~ - v.ni~n / resia~~~u Nwnc ~ ~~~~_ ._ A ~~*~ AdJin /~I ~~+. GN e../~G)~ /_Ci [' L_> i ~_ IL1 f si~awr=vx Ranuosiea i Gry~ ZW l ~ ,l/ ~ ~~ ~~5/3 ~ .. ~ ~ 8. llim RceiJCnu //JQ si~.m.~~ /~ ~/ (~ t} aogooswJ ~ ~ GlY ~ ziY / ~ / ~~ ' ~ l li ° l* t f / 9, P ~ j /~~I R Iww lj ~ 11~w/yam '~/._rr_a b~$Gl~~ NmdB i, ! ~ ~ ; ppp111~~, P V AJd usv / ~ 1, 1= Y~i- C Yl ~ L~~~~ ~ l i • ~ ------ / ~ r ry z~F ~+ 1~ 1 t ~® l,c n- l ~~~~ ~ R q :ma ~r C Y's~ JI ~ I .J m. F.ml Rumm¢ Nnm~ AJm<.~/S 71 C'. w.. Z.sr.,JosS. ~~4ta_ Ra~li,,_~9cv__.__c},s~tlJiSi+----- ~J-`i'ce------- s~~a~-, Req~evlea /^ n ~ an C t~~ (4 V l S T`i ziF ~ (r(~ 3 1 1 1 1 I1 d 1 t V ~~ + i 4 , ; l j e, the undersigned are residents of the Treviana at Lamas Verdes and M¢nct development in t(reCity of Chula Vista: We are awaze of the proposed South Bay BRT project being proposed by SANDAG. We aze ht OPPOSITION to the project on the followinggrounds: 1) [he cunetn plancalls for SANDAG to wedge a4wo or one lane bridge between the Treviana development utd the adjacent Monet development; 2) The bridge will have unreasonable and negative impacts hpod the Treviana and Mmret development in the form ofnoise, avpotlufion, vibration, visual impacts and teductiou in proyerty value. SANDAG has released a Dratt Environmental impact Report (EIR) fordte South Bay BusRapid Transit (BRT) Project. The release of iheDrafr EIR hasa 60-day public review and comment period ending " Mairoh 29, 2013 in which we 5nd unreasonablefo review a 559 page report. We DEMAND that the City of Chula Vista exercise its SANDAG votes to EXTEND ffie REVIEW PERIOD for a~minimum of Siz (b) months in which to peovide S,4NDAG with studied mpnt ili suppmtof our OPPOSITION. This petition is being submitted to Mayor Cox, City Counsel members a¢d the SANDAG Soazd of DirecHrr5 to DEMAND that they take action consistent with this petitimt and'SUPPORT omdemand [o reasonably EXTEND [Ire RF,VIEW PERIOD in which to properly respond to the SANDAG South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project v. rim. Name ~l~ ~ ~ - ~ Rrna~~~u ' Aidee+a ~s ~` siynil T (/~~~q ~J///~/ Q I //~~ t.~ma - ~~U_~.?~~ _'_aJ_.~_~'1 Cay+'il~~~~_Za>'a ~,za- -`~--~- R~ayGme /l Q ~/ V~^A.~d-CiL- ci~y liYlzAkA. ~l//~.e'~. ~P ~ ~ ~~~ r. ~riin v,mr ~ jQ..~~-/) vy~/ " R.,ie<~~w ~~y qr~~ ~,~ J ~~ ~ naaa.~~ "~ ~__.J~ 1rL~t~t _ sis~nwr~d, __ -Y- 9 VV'"'tt d. Ainl .N~> 1- ~LS ~O ~~~__ Rcci~m,Ja neea„ / Sp1 _..~2- ..., i°.~._ ZsAy frt~u- _ sp uvoss Rey nma Y ~~ r any zw ~ ti,. /k ~. ss ~ f. Ii in\ xem~ lffc w. -~ 1MP.V Rusi~rnw X06 l~l I ~a~.r_. [tL ~3------ si~e~ HcgoeB~eJ U'ry Zlp 13 ., s 5 a_n;m x~~~a_ j-Q.{~C rSGP CA _ (GAC-... Re.;e~~ naa~n.a 9210__ 71 M IU1 si~sm M a~ywm~a < _~~, c~ Ltiry C' d~G(GfJ Vi('TA Lq ~° I ~ ~ /~. v.Hmi Ny~~ ~~\ ~~~ R~.ae~~~u (l ~ ,,ae,r.: ` 2 LM,t1'Nn1___~1 Gt ----~~---~- --~-L~ - ---- ----------- Si6nvNrtae~ ~~9 ~~ rr qqn Rvyue~~W V { l `I( l (} Ci~v ("~ y, ~.~ V\ Y \tJ'f ~ 1j 1 ~ 1 \l ~~ 8. Piivt // f.~~J/~1^1 N~,ne-~. ~ _\. I L~..V W__l C __ ~ ~ -1_ Residrna 'I~ t ,iCtlrees Ir,~' ~,~( 1~V\'\_~', `~ ~F~ ________ ~L ~ 1 3~ tiignewam Rµo~xtW p (~ ~~ ~l A ..JJ q ~ { (,j CiiY ~.~ W~C~.~i~~ PAP - I ~~ ~~ _.e'.~ N ne (°.'t IV\_ ~ Cn ~1 1~ R~sia.nce O O tt ~ ~~C q !~ Aaa vs. ~ ~ ~QvlCiri~ ~CN9Q ~~ ~~41G1 +,~~ (~ 1 cp, n~rr ~~ ~ _ .. QQ ~ fi+'~ ~ ~~ ~4' ~~.V ci Vv Yi C'JX'' C_~NCI- why ~a. r,m~ Nom= f\c~ ~-G_ Ru:ia~a w~_~,rs=JgG?a~ar~tnl~0 c\e Ia~rvZ _.._ _ . n^ s}tr /nJ r', f d J J J J J 11 11'' ~G i~. e, the undersigned are residents of the Travianaat Lomas Verdes and Monet developmem in the City of Chula Vista. We m~e aware of the proposed South Bay BRT project beingproposed bySANDAG. We are hJ OPPOSITION [o the project onthe following grounds: 1).dte current plan calls for SANDAG to wedge a two or one lane bridge between the Trevixna development and the adjacent Mnnet development; 2) The bridge will have unreasonable and negative impacts upon the Treviana and Munet development in the form of noise, air pollution, vibration, visual impacts and reduction inproperTy valve. SANDAG has xelbased a Drafl Environmental hnpact Aeporf (EIR) for the South Bay Bus Rapid Teansil (BRT) Project. The release of the Draft EIR has a 60-day public review and comment period ending March 29, 2013 in which we find rmreasonable toreview a 559 page report. We DEMAND tha[theCity of Chula Vista exu cise its SANDAG votes to EXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD for a minimum of Six (6) months iu which to provide SANDAG with studied hrput in support of our OPPOSITION. This petition is being submitted to Maym Cox, City CounseLmembers and the SANDAG Board bfDirectors to DEMAND that they takeaction consistent with this petition and SUPPORTbm demand to reasonably -: EXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD in wlrich to prapedy respond to the SANDAG Souffi-Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project d 1. nml R~mUOo Nome /~i~=~--SLz57/- naaiom ZGZ=s ~/f"/T pE l~ C/ZL/~ ~ - - ~ JiynaNrt N ~ / q. - /~ /~i^ Rc9umted /C,.L~~. ...-""~-. ~'.~' GSN ~Z~ 1~'-Y ~i Li4 ziP 7~// ~ v 2 Pnnl. (^q ReGdm~m ~J ~'j p ( /~ ., Nwne R/~Ot ~UJ-1 Addmn (/Qf~J ~0~1(~~tMt/~ V'~VVVI ~. 'MVwre xt / 11 /~ /~ ~..%' CiN G~M.I ~~ l~~=tC CA' ZP I'`~ ( Z Rc9ucc¢d _ J. Rint ~ RcSidcnw .,.m. ~~~ , '~7i~rLAddr_ ~?/5_~~~~~/i>v Wiz` ~i~ c_'rJ,z--- T /1 S'S Weeaz / ___.... Cily a Zip R q clad --""-~="s=._ _-, ~~~~,~iJ[;,'r". ViC~'~C'~". ~~~/ j 1. R dmm 4. A't y/y ttd N' 'L~W ~{7~~\~~~ ACd a ~~V lll~l'lt~ ~ ~ l-~~Z'. S 6~ fir _ R9 ld~~ ~ r~OlA~~i~'I/<~ (. 9' 1.,.~U~~4 ~~~'~1 ~R l ~~~~ t / 5 H I 7~ 2 d ~ /J N (J14$ VQLn AJd ~ r~0< ~ ~L~/-a fN //<_~y\lUl e Sa I R9 ulad 4~// ~.~/ Rl ~ Lt~~2 ~15~4 AP "~ ~El! ~~ C ~~~ _ dd C/ / 1. Hinl M{ Reside~~w ' Nnim ~cf Li~ ~{~~ Addiaav ~~~ lam' ~I~1 ~~ I~P ~~ (~~VI Z _~~ _- ~~la, qq3 Rc9 1 d ~~ ~ Cry ~1~~(h ZiP ~ 1 ~" .l. N-l ~~~\11/~ Y ~Jdd=ce 2C~C~U 1. 1. t./N~I:'\~1 \V Y.w~~. \r~ ~.l~l:t C.__ - sl~nmm a: ~ aon~wlwi ,~, ~~ // city ~l / zq, ~ ~~ ~.> "~,.' UV ~~ V J P,i, ,'u A ~1i? R~:d~u ao~t~ C,~ Cl l~t,v~{ p-e_~~J.. cr~J2 Lnn ~ ?ddew i._. ~- k~~mre~ ~/ ~i,~ aly ~uIP- U;S~CA- see L~I ~~~~ g, Ninl Rvaidvvve 7 ~~,} ~ (1 ~~ ~}~ ~~~ I ' Nome ~: I _~Y ~ Inn .'/ __ Aed~ess l~-W l l~t1A ~ ~11[Li ~'. 1 (,t L~- „`~-K sirnammm /~ t/1~.~ wry R4mied L (~~ Clry ~I/l (~ Ij ~. ~~'~~t" ~P 1 ~ 1 I ~ V"-` IO.I ivl t ft ~ drnee N. u. Q-~,n~.1y11~-_. C~e~ .wJras~. ZW~ ~ti1~\h'(1 G 1Y~-~~~VZ- -~~k F=-1~1L ( / Sa~N2 eY R4 ~Iwl~ ... .--Glv ~~V V~~~ ~I~~~` ZiP ~~~~.~ '._.." ~ '- ._.. / J Y ~~ a J J J 4 (/ i f 1 i 1 ]C7 I ~ 1 e, the nndersignedare residents of the Treviana at Lomas Verdes and Monet development hr [he City of Chula Vista. We are aware of the proposed South Bey BRT projectbeing proposed by SANDAG. We are in OPPOSTEION to the project on [fie following grounds: 1) the current plan calls for SANDAGto wedge a two or one lane bridge between the Treviana development and the adjacent Manet development; 2) The bridge will have unreasonable and aegulive impacts upon the Treviana and Monet development in the form of noise, air pollution, vibration, visual impacts and reduction m properly valve. SANDAG has released a Draft EnvvonmentaLhnpact Report (EIR) for the South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project. The release of dre Draft EIRhas a 60-day public review and comment period ending _ Marclr 29, 2013 in which we find unreasonable [o ceview a 559 page report. We DEMAND that the Ciry of Chnla Vista exercise its SANDAG votes toEXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD for a minimum of Six (6) months in which to provide SANDAG with studied input in support of oar OPPOSITION. This petition is being submitted to Mayor Cox, City Counsel members and[he SANDAG Board of Directors to DEMAND [hat they take actimr consistent with this pe[itiou and SUPPORT our demand to reasonably EXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD in which to properly respond to the SANDAG South Bay Dus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project. L Hinl /'=n ~,~ RcdJCpw .~1~(' rµnl / -o ~ /G Noma l/~% ~~~ t WJass p /, ~ /L '~ -~- - tliµmMeyy /J/ R=gm+s[uJ ~~'~- ~ tRi6W RN Zip yN z. ~e R=,iJ~~< I%7G GE ry,irn fv or e, G/ox N~° ~(5<EDEt~' UVkCG wJ~~,_c (e_vls+m , I !ilk--- NeyoerteJ-5 l -CiN Lip ). Pn,J Ridrnw Nome ~ f{ ~ ~ O ~ ''y1 ~ ~ AUdan /~ ~ ~ t~N,t i nl • I O 3°,f =V Rry n Jm G V e ry Ct.,`t J•Yl Cte( "Yi l d. H1n( f kceiJanm ___ _ _ __ Ra9oesle ~ GIY ^`" 1 Z1p L) t!2 ~! ~~ ~~tg~C-'- J T R=siJ=rw it i, vin, Nan,='~,} { ~~ neaa,. ~ 59. ~4 p;wii'fro tiler l0. ~~.L'C is r"~rri -' -- --- -- sivnanu~v xwuJwule r i - c'r G~~:d (G2 vtsk, zip ~~~~3 Y '~l~C.~:1~ti liwnu_ rLX 1 V V.tJ~('.~~„~ AJdre__ may, y'-1 _ ( ~, , ltd i ~'1 i'}"(i ~SM1; _t1 ~__~ _ .L SL1 - lipnuNre vs RegoosiW ~ Wy ~ ~ lip ~~~~~ ;, ~ , , r _ _ _ ~--.- - Signaniwss Reyn tuJ GN Zlp tl. poor ( RcvJmce q Nnnm {1 ~_ ~1 f~~S dddrcs~ ~~~~ ~'r"W,_~ LG, _ _ _ Sip,nNrep J (,, p ~~ I ~I I Z.. Rcsp=ywJ f) ~ /f _~ _l "'"'__., Gay ~ ~ i '/~ t, s. ndm ~~~-.q/ 1 ~~qq x.aen~a ~/ ~~ ,~ Nmnn V^'`.~~( 1 i:~LrY= AdJrcsx ~~ / O ~ ~%~~ hlu ~I ~ ~C~..~L. ~ sipp~wrom I Requwatod GIY ~~ Ztp e ~~ ~ RualJrnm IO.PMI x~= ~~_%vr 17oMo5, nwewe Iu3z CCtIVGh:~N Nlti:.,l r, aequnnmJ C~ ~~' arv ~,~ zin "I ~ ~I1 ~ (J ~= -_~ _ J J J 4 i f ~, 1 to ! e, llie undersigned are residents' of dre Treviana at Lomas Verdes and Duet developmert in the City of Chula Vista. We aze aware of the proposed Son[h Bay BRT project being proposed bgSANDAG. We are m OPPOSITION to the project otithe followhrg grounds: 1) the current plmr calls for SANDAG [o wedge a hvo or one lane bridge between the Treviana development and the adjacent Monet development; 2) The bridge will have unreasonable and negative impacts upon the Treviana and Manei development in dre form of noise, air pollution, vibration, visual impacts and reduction in property value. SANDAG has released a Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR)'for the South Bay Bus Rapid Transit. (BRT) Project The release of the Draft EIR hasa 60-day public review attd comment period ending ' Marclr 24, 2013 in which we find unreasonable [o review a 559 page report. We DEMAND drat theCity of Chula Vista exercise its SANDAG votes to EXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD for a minimum of Six (~ months in wMch toprovide SANDAG with studied hipu[ in support of our OPPOSITION. This petition is being subnrittedto Mayor Cox, City Counsel members and [he SANDAG Board of Directors [o DEMAND that [hey take action consisterd with this petition and SUPPORT our demand to reasonably EXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD in wlrich to properly respond to the SANDAG South Bay Bus Rapid Ttznsit (BRT) Project. V L lt~p~ - RaiJrnm Nmne C.~71,Ffr-f~C>C~1arr,Z/~_,JJ~o=. f 4 4~ L CNtr-I two r r~~t_s}~C~q- SijTxlY2 sv ^~ pugpcNeJ GI, C'C/z2r~ has r7~ =iP ~t'l9 ( 3 ~ ~ ~.__. . Name\~~t_I- ~~!~tSaLl..r~-1 ~~(..LY1LLY!~~'~L[~.~."~ Siwvmre Rcyucx d CiN Lip ] ' ~ ~ w ~~. .t, . a J/ _ ].It _ R J N ,a . f=jyf (,A .(v,Ji /vCCAC.A l//. V)6 G/ .CP.i vl~6YD'~ AJJ _ _ _ Simallrtc aF RegvaslaJ CYry ZW 4. Hhrt II kesiJmw kunc ~ L-'fV'Gh {~5~+'' Atdrea 1~p~p~ ~~ ^=~a ~~t~~ slwvwa m - Reyuasletl /; /Ji~' Gry ~ln.. ~t+''+JI `;-c., Zin 91=~-t~ /..~~ R J ~« 5 H I n ~}\(Zl`J I~~~)~"j _ was _-I~yS~ ~~_~_T~~'.~- swl P a y I J '~ C ~; ~ ~ Cl l~i~ /j V > i~`~. z ~ 1° ~ `r-, 6. Ainr RvsiJanm wave ~ ~'~~.r~U ~L~%1,+~1y__ nam,7a. IL_IG ~.G~ll'Yl iP1~ 1" ~~rQi~i1G~11'1 C%l i r n I a 'arn~ l _. i 8. P~ivl hvn lY_rvul- Rwltla~a / //"tom,' ~ AJJrcu 7L ~ l~^ '" Rwv du ~~~'" " ary l y// _ " P ' ~d~ a x`/9/,3 ` 9. Rin ResiJma aJJ,~:. 198y ~txtminika cm~q----- N`""° ~Vg~1 ggi~ s~ ^ - _ . - $~B~nlnM1M1i / ~ (~~""~C ~) q R.wv~ma .G.'~~ cry C~ltU, V S zip ~ ~ 1 lo. Pam xa~iarnu (/~/ yy7 .~( f' \wvc _ JJ_ I i ~~I rll I _-J1(_CLl~_:_.- _ .y' wal~rte us }/^rV,,'(I HnyuaslW Glv l/11~{ I ~ ~ /f/'~ Zip /a I// J r 1 I Y We, ds undersigned are residents of the Treviana at Eomas Verdes and Monet developmenC iatlre City of Chula Vista. We are awaze of the proposed South Bay BRT project being proposed by SANDAL. We are in OPPOSITION to the project on the following grounds: 1) the current plancalls fur SANDAG.to ~ wedge a two or one lane bridge between the Treviana development and dre adjacent Monet ~ development; 2) The bridge will have unreasonable andnegative impacts upon the Trevinna and MoueC development in the form of noise, air pollution, vibration, visual impacts and reduction inproperty value. SANDAL has released a Dmft EnviroortienW Impact Report (BIR)fortlie.South Bay Bus Rapid Transit ~ (BRT) Project. The release of the Drag EiR.has a 60-day public review and comment period ending March 29, 2013 in which we fmd unreasonable Co review a 559 page report. We DEMAND that the Ciry 1 of Chula Vista exn~ciseits SANDAL Votes to EXTENDthe REVIEW PERIOD for a minimum of Six (6) months in which to provide.SANDAG with studied input in support of our OPPOSITION. Tlris petition is being submitted to Mayor Cox, City Counsel members and the SANDAL Board of Directors to DEMAND [ha[ they take actimr consistent with this petition and SUPPORT our demand to reasonably 1 EXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD in which to properly respond to theSANDAG South Say Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project. V S J J V LPrinl ~ Ro•idmce (~ ~ /~ Nom< ~ V_~~+~-J--CV ', / Z'. Z, _4ddrens ~ (~.Il.1 `~G /' I! y .. ~ _ ~~~-- SignaNr[:N Ruyuulnd /J ~ Gly ! v7lt ~ ~ Zp ~/ L/ vt ' t -' ~ Naini ~ry~ Addrcsi~Wr~_ `~~.,/1r (~ om /~ ( R¢mc:md lily // / I /h~" (") ~A z i P l 11 II ~~ { - ~ J.lynn Q ~ `~ ..QL R~.iau~cc V~I~~ ~~h~~ V~_ Name Addmn - -- aequcslod ~ City Z~ SiPUlnre~ ~ -_ (~/AIIIrn UIS~CG~ " ~~~ti13 .y.ltinr Ravduom Nnne Mdrt¢¢ \n~re.S_~I~n_~Za~ _ ~`t`76_ L.v~uNi -~-- ---'- s~®~mu<r or I licqucs¢d / f//~ ,// Grv ~'\~' ~ ZiP [/, , (~ ! ~~~ C./ v ~ ~ ~rn _1 5_Pinl n Aualdrnw Nvnc ~)~ U I ~ ~/~'~ /~ Adaa.: ~ L W l l~r) l~ Q/ 0 ,,~~((--~. a~q~~.aa~ ~ f ~~ cl~ li Y 1 U ~~ V 1 J T c~ zin r 1~ l Nnina ~' ~(~ ~ ~ Add=rexs I y t(/U _vVlh Rf Q~_~ rl V ~ / '~__ Siy~alwc vs ~ ~/jG//~ 9~f¢~'' (` /-~l, p RWUwed~ ~ J-! ~~.&'' V Gty L/ ~1~,~~ ~ IS ZiP ! ~ / ~ .. ].Print Rnidcnce ~ q Nunn S ~01~+~4-~> Ada¢us. ~y64J _. LM~~VI°SS_ n2sv --_Y__ y~lA _ __ Slgumrcus aequeslW .-7 ary Cla~~ia- viSTa- L" 9~5r3 e`-~G2~---_. Numv-~I~p IJ~IMA yLddeeun-`=1.111 CJ .t~.$.A._t ty l'4~ 1 .~1- ~~1 3ippnWrv as //~~ RcgovsfnL i y~ p , . _ ~ V WIX.y p Gly ~ ZP /~ (~ ~'~~ ~ p ~/ I~~ V l~ 9. Pint ~' ! ~ cJ Rosldar v 4~ t ~rzNf ~~~ !!! Nvme ~i._~1~~. ~~I~~.pJde ¢¢ ~ ~C LN__ RWUCSIW CiN Cr I~IV` v V~~ ~f~ Z'P ~' 1~- IO. P~inl ('y/~ Ro¢idaia ~~~(~~( ry ~ f J~ Nimc ~ il1y~ ~~~_ ~~ Addiw¢_.J_1>L.l_-~1i'~f.~1.1.- 6ipiuwm m' Rcyu Ynd ~ City ~ ZiP ,.~ L 1 1 1 t e, the undersignedare residents of the 9'reviana at Lomas Verdes and Monet development iii the City of Chula Vista. We are awareof lhe..proposed Saids Bay BRT project being proposedby SANDAL. We are in OPPOSITION to the projecC on the following grounds: 1) the current plan calls for SANDAL to wedge a two or one lane bridge between the Treviana development and theadjacenC Monet development; 2) The bridge will have unreasonable and negative impacts upon the Treviana mld Monet development in the form-of noise, air pollution, vibration, visual impacts mrd rednctionin propery value. SANDAL has released a Draft Environmental hnpact Report (EIR).for the South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BR"f) Project. The release of the Draft EIR has a 60-day public review and cmnment period ending March 24, 2013 in which we find wueasonable [o review a 559 page report, We DEMAND that the Ciry of Chula Vista exercise its SANDAL votes to EXTENU the REVIEW PF,RIOD for a minimum of Six (6) monfhs in which to provide SANDAL wide studied input in support of uur OPPOSITION. Tlris petition is being submitted ro Mayor Cox, Ciry Counsel members' and the SANDAL Board of Directors to DEMAND [hat they take action consistent with this petition and'SUPPORT our demand to reasonably EXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD in which to properly respond to the SANDAL South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project. 1. YGin Rcutlmw ~~ Ri~~I~RO, _ / ~ ~i C y IT I R J v~c ~1V.f-_ ~~LL~ S gn lu,e u R 9 vied C N ~'bl ~~ Zir ~~ NUJie \ Ll~IV~/V V KJIR1lF~. I `iU t~ C~JV\ti5 C/1~ ! v`-~/ ,i~.m,~z, ~7/ ! 3 RequasiW ~r~ \~ \Y" _ 1 ,V 1 Ciry C/V~ U LQJ~Gu LiP / ..L~.AwYV" iJ ! .S ~.~. csdmw a a .~ GIY ~{~~~ti['. A/V41 ~ nR ~ ~~ ~ _ . ,,.- i/. . S. N'inl. ResiJenu ~/ X -yJ Nmn _~ i~/7Ff /- fir/ U Or- neamsa / U/~~ ~!'/Y~ 7~.-.-V ~ ____ _/'[_ a~.q~awe ~i ~~~ °~~ ~~`/~(~ ~%J~~ Lip L~~y/3 e~.!r . . L Rsiarnco _ s: tam / }, } Numo ~ - K'~_I IVY AJa~vns ~~~+tN~~NVAS.I~/J ~S - - Re9u.al:tl CITY G2"J t~LFt ~/1 S~ Z'V `{ l ~ 3 y ` /' y ' ~ ~. -rv~(iJ WSJ _l o/%.J S __waaeo~r~.LS~~~~@1w_?0 1~.,_#_~ -- _ . si~~nuo~r RequeslW ~~~ C'N Zip / _ Aaaeu= ~ ~ T V •N/IQ.S DIC.iW ~ ~tl (~ 3L ""' ~ .N~ -_ _ ~___ _-- _ _ S'~~xive v R gaosmh,.._-C~~*'~~ ~~ ~ U~ r y..~ 1/v ! IV., alR ~.~Q~ L N.m~ ~-. 1. Ct~ wdaruns 1...-y V~t/'~' _>~. 1-t-~L3_--- _ Si@~maroH ))//// n Re4^os ul Gly ~ ~" ~\C Zip ~ I~ /.~ / ~ I O. Ynal n m~. - kesidenw ~~ ~~ / (~, names - Mi~.~_.__~__ -_-_. ~ _____ __. ______ - - R~~ ~ R I sltd ~ ^ I ~ / ~ ("///~/~~~ QI ~/' U) /~. ~ Zp /l ~I / / J Y a J V/ J V/ V' yr 1y II l j0 i 1 8, the unders igned areresidents of the Treviana at Lmnas Verdes and Monet development igahe City "of Chula Vista. We are aware of the proposed South Bay BRT project beingpi;oposed bySANDAG. We arc in OPPOSITION` to the project on the followinggrounds; l) the current plan calls for.SANDAG to ~ wedge a two or one lane bridge between the Treviaoadevelopment and the adjacenC Monet ' development; 2) The bridge will have unreasonable andnegative impacts upon the Treviana and Monet developmentin theform of noise, air pollution,vibration, visual impacts and reduction in,property value. SANDAL has released a'Draft Environmental Impact Report (El R) for the South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project. The release of the Draft EiR hasa 60-day public review and comment period ending March 29, 2013 in which we find unreasonable to review a 559 page report. We D)MAND that tfie,City ' of CFiala Vista exerclsc its SANDAL votes to EXTEND the REVIEW PERTOD for a minimum of Six. (6) months in which to provide SANDAL with studied input ih support of our OPPOSITION. This 1 petition is being submitted to Mayor Cox, City, Counsel members and the SANDAL Boardof Directors to DEMAND"that they take action consistent with this petition and SUPPORT our request to reasonably , EXTEND the.RF,VIEW PEiiIOD inwhich to properly respond to the SANDAL South Bay Sus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project. AJd l UIJ..) ~(.(I' !t/I t.I G' ~{ L~K. ~Y'K :..:... u e Y~ft I~L'.~i~~~ ~.~~YS .~ V( _.__ . - ~ c ~ ~1Lt"~~( V L.~1~. ~~ p ;~ ~~~~~~ 5 °•°~`d~ , ry ` ~ L, wrw-.t' ~ - 3 p{ ~ T { /_ ft d ( j Nnma t~~{'7 ``// V~LX.~~1'G;(~" Add s ~~J ~i ..~ ~CS ~Y9 lrv('~~ ~~.~ 4-t (" l._.(~4q.'~ ._._..... __ _ __ Z___." __...._ . _.._____ _...._.. _.___. __._.... ___.____ ...__..__ / Sldmmrc xv' / - _ /~ Rcq~~anca '~Gl..-~'t~_-L^~.. clr ~, ~l GL ~~f ~~~ :S/"°L. c C.!fEL~~ ~~ ~7 / J ./" P... jj, ) }~ ,~j. .~ i _~E~/~'f~`~"'. t. ~i l/`~ AdJJS' e ~ 7L~i~ ~f'~.Ati(.yvls(~ ~~~~_~~--'~--". tt ~ rcmc~a~ ~, ~ ~ ~ -___ _ ~ ,Y ~v t~ ~,~ ;~ yip ~~ r °t t ~ ~ ( ~ ~, . 4. Riu( Reiidamc NT,~e ~.I~.~~-u, 1~~~i L,~~1 AIJ i~, z~5 r'.l 1 ~-~-t.~---- - s;B,a,u, rd x ,~ p d ~ y .. - , 2 .. -, ~, ~, r~Z t/}.~, ~L.. '~~'lr.~ ~rvi~ n i I ~,cj. ~ J L.:~- z 'i"'u ~7 ~~ -- -- - - --- - - /I - -- - -__ - R@.mn~ed~ ~. -j "_~`•+ GtY ~j}lu!7.X1'~1 ~/ ~"' ~/ p {~'~l r~- ~~ ~-'"'~_ F. Pint "' ~ R ' Irncv /~ ,f~ h ~o v„o~„ i fj.i~ l ~f 1 L y~q 't;--t~~ ( nan ~ ~`7~`Y ~,~!%~/1fl/Q (,/1~..~~ ~-v ~3~(~~ ___.._. R n «n. ~Z'C_ J/~~f~Y.! ~~.~- c ~r f~iy~JGy,j, j i J 1r~4 iiu ~ fL~, / P'l R ' U " _l.t'~~~ c-~ ~c ~~~ ~; r~r~~A l ~ ~~t__y__ f C~Q~v~ l l~l ~-E~ ~~ G-~:_C` c ~ ~_. Requex~e~.//'i~r /1/t~'7~l'L~ Cirv l..-ll.(.(:~. CC ~~~f ~ i ~'l,_ Lip % / ~~l G".'U // ~ ,. GG GGGGGG & P nl ~ J~ R I 7( 1 / I ~t`-~J - I N neC '} r/ h.~ L~ ,mot,{ AUU : s _`` Cq. J ~(. J~._UV_ s~ _" ( / 4 F t 1 I t t 1~1 "G ~ Ir/_.._l. ,~'"' l Z._,.. ...... _ ._.___ _.F ____.___ -...1~N.'L,?F:r=_. w.. _._~ I s ~ym~a« es ~ ~ Zip ~ R Vuesmd. ~~. <j. ~m" ~~ ~ CaY ~~~1 Ll~-~~ ~I 5~1 li(r I ..--.-. (/ yy..~~,, / f ~"- ~ ~ Iti ~ (~(~~~/I AUI~. I~~~/ C V1lt Li(1411/ ~-lam l.; C/U~_ f J V J J ~, c~ 1 e, the undersigned are residents of the Treviana at Lomas Verdes and Monetdevelopmeut in the City of Chula Vista. We are aware of the proposed South Bay BRT project being proposed by SANDAL. We are iir OPPOSITION to the project on the following grounds: 1) the current plan calls for SANDAL t'o' wedge a two or one lane bridge beriveen the Treviana development and the adjacent Monet development; 2) The bridge willhave unreasonable and negative impacts upon the Treviana and Monet development in the form of noise, air pollution, vibration, visual impacts and reduction in property value. SANDAL has released a Draft Environmental hnpact Report (EIR) for the South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project. The release of the Draft EIR has a 60-day public review aztd continent period ending March 29, 2013 hi which we find mueasonable Yo review a 559 page report. Wel)EMANll that the City of Chula Vista exercise its SANDAL votes to EXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD for a minimum of Six (6) months in which to provide SANDAL with studied ntput in support of otti OPPOSITION. This petition is-being submitted to'Mayor Cox, Ciry Counsel member's and the SANDAL Board of Directors to DEMAND that they take action oousistent with this-petition azid SUPPORT otu demand to reasonably EXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD iirwhich to properly,respond to the SANDAL South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project. L E4int Rcsidencc iy - Nnm< ~~ . Y F~ , ~ '~. AJJress ~ `~t t ~. 1 -'-----rye-- ~----~} -- ~~'~-`-~--------- '-'---'- C wc'i~_~~-_ - -- ---------'-- Siymamm as - R.qucst=d.~7 Giy - Zip (~ a~..=l. ~l(,' ~'-All ~li"~Vy -'lC~~~ z. Print ^ a«.a<ne< - -1 Narna Q ~~ l~~ ~ C -- - AJdse-^ 1 `t'S ~_ (~J t`3 ~. 1 -------------t~_ ~_ SQL•'la-`~~---Y------------------ ~--- Ri~nntn,e as Regncsma cim zip , ~'~4. , . 3 ° 4Ll~,t ' 7. Pim. ~ R Idwec ~ L ~; Nazn< i~/L G IZ p .4~ } ~i Add e s ~~ °C~~ . Z ~ ~_ _ ~ ~ -__ _. -J. .___ -l-` ~ -____- tiiynaWro as R ~ uuslcJ - ~ ~j ~ ~~// ~~~~ ~~ -yr y~ Gj' - ~(• ~i{.~ - Zip C G~ty ~~1vLV~jt ~ ~ ~tiR"r~ ( ~T' , J ~ 7 ( 1L '' 0.. [him /,(~- ResiJeitoe ~./~ -~y?~) None 1,/sL ~~~___-~_~Addasx_~~I vfD Ir"°~Vi(,LG_~~~~i S.r~ Rcyn<skd ~ Cirv ~~ `~ V1S~ Zsp ~ 1'I ~~ y ~ N~mt _~-~i.C S (:q • ~ i~'I-4' C7 R d ncd ~) - may/ N ~n Add- ~4l ~i 'TM2R i%Y ~/{ ~G F~C. ~~ ~~'•j/ ~`~.. ~~ll.. __, _ _.___.__._._e_______~ 5'Ntntum 00 __.__ ____ Requested Cnty 4p ~6 Rint ~ ~/ ~ kov dcnce ~7 -~'~ • Nmne +0~ (~~~St)/5 Add ~`-/,~d" lPJNV1(~~L° ~~/~ 1-/ s~gnuiwv :ts 1... yLl ~GJ V +.~'~ ~/,~+ R<qu<sicd~ ~\J Ciiy r ,ZIP / ~ 1 ~~~ -. / .. . ./•--^. Nan fLt'_.. ~Z 1~/•l~i __-_ Address-'~~ =.~~ e] - ~~~feL_____.__ Siq~ot as Re~nostal City Zi i p ~~~ Er I' lf~~i~ 8..Piiut '' , / /y~~ Rusidenoc [y(~ ~ L ~~ /y~ Kamc t~1 Addresv I ~~SJ ~~ 311 `~ ~'(N1 ~~ ~ ~~ / S! - - __ ___•t _ _~ __-.___ _. T Si~~nfim v Roqueste City Zip 9 Hlt R d ce °•' (e8 L~Kr•~ ~ Nm f`~( ~~~;_Y_ss-~IS1L~3~.~5~?~ "`_ ____`-1~J! ~__~____.____- t . t Rcgocsce City Zip N . ~ -Addri ss~ ~ ~1 _I~ ,1 ~~~I~1:.:: LV, ~.`.'_~ ~__`____ - j/ ,~~ n c t\ R quusteJsa / 4 ~ V ~Crv ~~ ~P ~ ( ~ ~. ~~~ y 1/ ,.~~ V 1 ~ 1 I~ e, the undcrsighed aze residents of the Treviana at Lomas Verdes and Monetdevelopment in the City of Chttla Vista. We are aware of the proposed South Bay BRT project beng proposedby SANI~AG. We are in OPPOSITION to the project on the following grounds: 1) the current plan calls for SANDAL to ' wedge a two ar one lane Midge between the Treviana development and the adjacent Monet development; 2) The bridge will have unreasmiable and'negative impacts upou.the Treviana and Monet development in die form of noise, air pollution, vibration, visual impacts"and reduction,in property value. SANDAL has released a DraftEnvironmental Impact Report (EIR) for the South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT). Project. "Phe release of the Draft EIR has a 60-day public review and comment period ending Mazch 29;.2013 hr which we find wtreasonable to review a 559 page report We DEMAND that the".City of Chula Vista exercise its' SANDAL votes to EXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD for a minimum.. of Six (6) months in which to provide SANDAL with studied input in support of our OPPOSITION: This petition is being suhuritted to Mayor Cox, City Counselmembers and the SANDAGBoard of Dhectors to DEMAND that theytake action consistent with dris petitimt and SUPPORT' oiti demand Co reasonably F.XTENll the REVIEW PERIOD in which to properly respond to the SANDAL South Bay Bus Rapid ` Transit{BRT)ProjecC: V J J V bI Y LPrint ~~('O}~~~j~ (I~~(~Q"'~ t ^ Nvm=1Mt `""r_I'~11'."' X~~ ~c~ Residence Q a`~~.j.pY f Address ~.`° V'+Ul'c1 ~~I:~- ~-~~ _ _ Sigiamre as Reque9ud ~ ~ City ~ _v _-- %ip -- ~y y .yy ~!'('1 (J d. Nint n Residcucc ~(yl/^n r~/~ 1 ~ J Name Qrl~'S 5(~ LI~~ A Address ``.~''! ~(C~ /~/II ~--_--_-_-.-_- -_-_ (/ ' 4~. ~ ~ _ Jiwamro iu Rcqucsled City {~ . / .. 7.ip (N /~ /!7/ J V'r °l t 3, Print AesiJcnw Siyn,aturc as ~~ Re9nestud ( 1 /~ ~ ~ ' CiN Zip 4. Pint Nama ~ktrt.0 ~! Residenm Addresx Ig4°I wR~2 UC- 3 --- --- ~Sipmtnroas ^ 's ~ A Requested VVW` ~. - City /1 /f (~~ 1 I'S~ Zip err l/ ' ~t ~q/3 f S. Pin[ Nang ~v,S4R/m_ Cvls-tOl u t, V ----- ' Residence Aaareaa /5/'~Y GVO te/ L~'L+ ?~ 3.. Signntc'cax e~Q~ /.t.4. ra Re ucsted 9 ~ae+~ir ~rno a ~: City Z~ P /y(a/~ waLu.L'/ q/9~3 Nama p`-}~.~r (y l.~V 1"rCir'~ Add_. ~Y ~~ ~U''r'F'/~ U. ~ }i' Requested ,, - ray ~ U ` ~t if t ~~ G Z'p ~~ 1 ~~ ~ 7. Hint ~.{2csidrna - Nnma''~ ~t~S~ ~ Vl!lCtaJ,~as (t(S~c (r~tr,~,.~-Y' L-Gt = ~ ~l~ = ~ Gvl.tG- `j _ = ------- '----- ---- Sir~oNro Renpiesle -"' C~ -------------- ---- City ..-, Zip c~+~ ~,4- its t~~ --- --- --- - y~s~ ~ 8. Ninl ~. J ~ , ~ Nam Re>idutw q (,(n ~} Address. r `' S' ~ / +~ . ~~ u[ ~ ~ _ --_______ t~ _- -_ - - - ~- - .- 5 ynature ax RegnGSlCa ^ ~ ,.`, __ _-_- CItV Zlp - _ // TT ~~ //( (/ ~J\ -9. Tint - r -y ~ ~~ Rosidrs,cu _______ _~ -~-._-. -M Si~nWm ss., RcquesteJ ______-_____~ City ~t^'1 ~,(~~ `C ~/~9 Zip r tU s~ I ~7 . N. -_~~ ~.~ 10. Prim ~ Na,nc ~ ~t-~ ~"' ~ / R iJCncc c. p~ /~ Addrws ' . is ~~ to ent~ ~`~ Zip ~ ~y ~ , i I 1 F ,c, e, the undersigned are residents of the~Treviana at I omas Verdes and Monet development in the City of Chula Vista. We are aware of the proposed South Bay BRT project being proposcd~by SANDAG- Wc. arc in OPPOSITIOn` to'lhe prtijecton the following grounds: 1) 11ie current plancalls tor. SANDAG to wedge=a rivo or one lane bridge between the Treviana development and the adjacent Monet development; 2) The bridge will have unreasonable and negatibe impacts upon the Treviana and Monet. BcveLopment in thePdrm bf noise, air pollution, Vibration, visitalimpacts andreduclion in~ progerty value. SANDAG has relca"sed a llraCt.Eirvironniehtal Impact Report (EIR) for the South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project. The release of the Draft~ElR has a 60-day public review and conuncut period ending March 29, 2013 in which we find unreasonable to review a 559 pageaeport. We DEMAND that the City of Chula-Vista exercise its SANDAG votes to EXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD Tor a minimum of''Six (fi) mmrths in whirls to provide SANDAG with studied input in support of our OPPOSITION. This petition is being submitted to Mayor Cox, City Catnsel members and the SANDAG Board of Directors to DEMAND that they take action consistent with this petition and SUPPORT our request to reasonably E%TEND the REVIEW PERIOD in whichto properly respond to the SANDAG South Bay bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project. v tl J f S L Pint /~ ~ RcStAencx a 2 h~tq~Z AAAross i~{~~~f V~G Fes~t~ • MR l >, vnx , , si~~„nre,= RxquxseA tit>. Sq~ n~ ego 'ip ~L I z 7 2~NanLe y AdAdznre ~//~{~r(~ /~Gj/~/ - - $1^IIOLLVi as Regaeaie ~+~ eav Cf~GlL.4 ~//~`!~' z,P ~/`~/~ L O u 3. Prin A~~~~~ ~ Qp~ ResiAenre ( p~~ /_ /~ r Nntne--f ~C/ld7JSa''^^Wd~___-__ _--_--.AAAress_-II~~12--LGY/'t'I(YCO--_~~(.V/Gj-_lQ~Q`_--...-_-_-----. t - Signvlnre as Ralnesta Ciry. ~,A 'jt~M n-.1 ~ Tp ` Res a..rdm ----ndad~nro ~ 1~0 Namx ~ vcae _~(~i1~1------~_L~!`nl----------- ----Illsd-_~.4~_lowno.-----~-------------------------------- ------ si~~t~ux„ RegvrsreA C-y "lip $~ Die c ~~126' 5'. Prins .-.---_ ---dente Res q ~j7 j~~ ~ / Name ~~ t~~(~ ~ddrxss ~(J~" (,C+7 (CC~SC-__~_" Q,, t~ __..._-__. 5564 ~'~""' _ _ ___-___- v-._-.!~~_-_---- -..~ ._----_-_- _ _. - -__._.-.__.---_ -_ _- ________ -_--.__ - -- - Z(r Si_nacw as hh R 1 /%ry Requested City ~~ ~, 0 ' f 2' "~ fi, Rint ,. Residence v-~ Namx ` ~f~~ ,1dAress SQLtt fytl}~. ~t2L/ L/ly ------------------------------ - -------- -----~--------------------------------------------- U ~ ~ - ---- ___.-.---- - - dignnmre as T~ Requesed fiiy CJL/ ].IP ~Z fit'( ~ Residenrz 1 Pdm AAAL~as 3So2 PPS~U Ott SMF.3A _ unmx y~pNtY~ N~? ~t --- - - ----- ~ Q , -- - --- - - - -- ---------- ------------ - -------- ------------ si~,n;nr~ as goes Z, Rx ~xa city FjL`-1-loNtk~ C( P ~ ~Ry v e. Pdm ~~j~y"~,~{ ~j~~~ ~/~~ /~/, RcsiAm¢c //-J~~ ~ ](~T~ N,imc "J--'-~ Y~rc-[!i!Y-!~AMddress _ e' '~ ~~~ -C_•----_-_._..-.---_-_-_ +-_-'~- -- - - ~~ CIY Zp 91 t R 1 u~ ~ nr ~ v'F~.- C.SNL- hamc H~ Addrcs~. - _ l TAl (v'115 ly,~\t l~ V'LYLl~• l-C-~ TP 91 -It~ R q .t~_ Ctt Vlst~ e, the undersigned are residents of the Treviana at Lomas Verdes and Monet development m the City of Chula Vista. We are aware of the proposed South Bay I3R'I' project tieing proposed by SANDAG. We are in OPPOSITION to the project ou thefollowing grounds: 1) the current plan calls for SANDAG to wedge a two or one lace bridge between the Treviana development and the adjacent Monet development;.2) The bridge willhave,ivreasoriable and negative impacts upon the Tret~ana and Monet development in Ure form of noise, act pollution, vibration, visual impacts and reduction in property value. SANDAG has released a Draft Enviromnenlal Impact Reporb(EIR) for the South Bay Bus Rapid Tra,}sit. (BRT) Project. The release of the Draft EIR has a 60-day public review and comment period ending Mazch 29, 2013 in which we find mtreasonable to review a 559 page report. WeDEMAND that the Cily of Chnla Vista exercise its SANDAG votes to EXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD for a minimum of Six (6) months in which to provide SANDAG with studiedutput in support of om' OPPOSITTON. This petition is being subniltted to Mayor Cox, City Counsel members and the SANDAG Board of Drrec[ors to DEMAND thaEthey-take action consistent with this petition and SUPPORT our demand to reasonably ' EXTENDtlre REVIEW PERIOD ht which to properly respond to the SANDAG South Bay Bus Rapid 'Transit (BRT) Project. t. Print .- ,,,,, knsidenm Name d~ ti r ~~s Addreax i ,6 ~ u2r'~,,'t-~ (cam si~na~raas /~/-~ Rmwcstcd ly N City ~~~ ~ t ~ ~~ 7,~p ~~ `~ 2. Print `) y.' ( .- Residence ( /~ ~ ~ ~ , /~ /t ) Name Nlr-~L-_.2 ~t.~~~~~_. Address.-L~~-.(~(dilM_•y_~~}~VS.-i~.I_{_~~~... Siy~amrc as Requested _~~~~ ~~. ~CIIV ,.., (~ r ~ ~ y r~~~~ Zip ~ ~ ~~~ 3. Print ftosidmrce (.~ /^/~ \ `` Name~y/' C. ~v ~_ Address /+~ I t~ C~Mt \+'A.l~j ~ 1. (~ ~571/~ _ - - _____ J ' 1 ~ -.--.--.-_-~ -~-. _ -._-. 4 -_ _ Sigoa¢Iro as / . ' Rwuds~.r' lJriF/'~ Uty ~.~' " `~ /at V (1 ~/{ 7ilf ~ { / Y -- R id nee / ,~y y /n~ 4 [h'int e`-~ Jf ~ /)~ [a/~ /'/ Name~~ l d~ /~d 1/'(1,,... Addres~ t V ~I € .:mast =t^l 1'91 JT !.I/'~, 41'+ $ acs <' CN . ( Zip ~ /./ ~ '(~ ` -.. _ / ' P. t R id nee _ N ,e_--~'LCk~;,. t a)= 1.._.fY.l Aeaa t s.~i~E `'~° =-~ J.1a ~scy c..~r~,,-'~i Siylatwc as Rogoesrod GN ZIp {~ 1 ~ 1 6. Prins Residence .4ddnss ~ .. Nam _ .,-~ ,~, 5~ Liz-r,~-±_-! i 6 `F- ~`-'r~ rs ~e~.~ ~3'xe1- 9 ~ e _ - _---- - ----- - SI&IllNi 65 ' d ... ~ cry Zip Acqueatc C.k.,.v s:,-~.. ~i.1'~~13 10, ~", Z H-ins Residence /'~~ n q /^ Namu ~1' _} .5:~--c l.td ress_~`Z.~~-I~.GVY~~~-S.n (_~a4_U ~_-_ SiyJlamroyI a~s Rt~/ City ^ VI.G.~Ge.. V r ZiV d L...J / J'~ - I 't R._ me.. 8. I1'ri tt Nance ! : 1 Add sslf ,.\ ~'~y ---~-~~"CSl-~''rt-~t-'------ T~1~'3..F-~_. ~!,_ r. tea,. ~ a- ~ - Slysamro Requested _s City Zip _. q. Print R sidcnce 1 ~~ J~~ r J tJmn~O~_~"" t~ ~.~%~d ~ f.- Aaa' aa_~(.' ~ ~ ~A _ tom.-1__`:(__-_-__`_______- d`~ - Sitmayne ns AnA Rcyucsted t-17' /~ 1 I ~l /,._ t /I S~/}- ZIP ~ t ~ I '~1 l.%a~{ V 1 ID. Yrin t Aosidenw N:unc (~ } ``y' Addlcss (}, \ yry~, U s-~ t Sipmhuv as City ~ ~\~ 1 Re91lcued Zis ~ ~~~ „r .t J J V V J (~ e, the undersigned are residents of the Treviana at Lomas Verdes and Monek development ur the City of Chula. Vista. We are aware of the proposed South Bay BRT project being proposed by SANDAG. We , are h7 OPPOSITION to the project on the following grounds: 1} he current plan calls for SANDAG to wedge a two or one lace bridge between the Treviana development and the adjacent Monet development; 2) The bridge will Kaye umeasonable and negative impacts upon the Treviana and Monet development in the form of noise, air pollution; vibration, visual hnpacts and reduction in property value. SANDAG has released a Draft Ehviroiunental Impact Report (EIR) for the Sou[h Bay,Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project.'The release of the Draft EIIt has a 60-day publicseview and comment period ending ' March 29; 2013 in which we find unreasonable to review a 559 pagereport. We DEMAND that the City of Chula Vista exerciserts SANDAG votes to EXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD for a minimum of Six (6) months in which to provide SANDAG with studied inputin support of.our OPPOSITION. This petition is being submitted to Mayor Cox, City Counsel members and the SANDAG Boaid of Directors to ; .DEMAND ttiat they take action consistent with this petition and SUPPORT our demand to reasonably EXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD in which to properly respond to he SANDAG'South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project. 1 Mnt ~ Numc I t] -E~ Q-` ,L Ae6idenee Address / ~j ~~_ R ncsled (aly ~P ~~ ~~ ~ ~ .. ~ 'W- / T/Gl / l' 1 2. Print Nemc _ p y~ tt `l/ I11 ~1~"Ill l~ I~)l,~V lA Aeddrnce ~ p~//T V~ (~y~(~ ~'j\ Addtus ~,~~I L-'~-V IAt \~ Ir+y pi_~-/. SignaWrou Rcquul tity Zi0 (~ ~ 1 7. Ri N,~,~c'T., v it\c~-°«y Rcsidcnw AdaR=< ~'M6l 1,2J~' I o~,e. -~~ Sienamrc ns W;gautcil ~~j/ ~(/ ~'ty ~~a ~/ i ~ ~~i f `t 13 4 Rmt N~= c1 u lle. i1 a sfur Rsnidrnw Addres~ t ~(~ f Le va •t~ G~~_ Si@sanueu Regae6ied ~ ~ Q/ Ely ~ ~t~~- ~~~5~~ Zip -/ G L ~~ Name 'r l (ti ~ Tj ^Vi Address ~ ~~ la C~ th 0 t _~,..1~ ,~e'.rM.%-. ~ y ~T SiefaNmu Regnes~ r (7 (~ ( q Cny ~kliA..V-Cn. ~ 1~ Lp ~ ~ t Nsme ~ I ~ ~~`(/.. Address `~ ~ l",. V `mil a / f "". / .(~ si~,anne~ Requested _ City /a / / ' J 7vp ~. / L,, (~/c~~//sC l/~S /c~ Nomn ~ Address _ Sipmturcu Requestd. ~--~ (]N Zip p. Print Rnsid~nw Name Addrus Si~~ure as Acgneslcd ~itY ZIP B. flint Recidenw 'Nana lWdrcs6 Sipm(urc ns Rcque9ed. City 'Zip 10 Pant Residrnce Nmne Address Siymtmcaz Requested' ciN Zip V J ~'~ J l( e, the undersigned are residents of the Tre~~iana at Lomas Verdes and Monet dcvelopment in the City of Chtrla Vista. We are aware of the proposed South Bay BRT project being proposed by SANDAG. We. are in OPPOSITION to the project on the following g[ounds: 1) the cun~ent plan calls for SANDAG to wedge a h~o or one lane b[idge between the Treviana development and the adjacent Monet. iicvclopmcnt; 2) The bridge will have tmreasonable.and negative impacts upon the Treviana and Monet devclopntent ih the form of noise, air pollution, vibration, vist~l impacts. and rcductionin property value. SANDAG has released a.Draft Environmental Lupact Report (EIR) forlhe South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Peojecl. The reloase of the Draft EBi has a 60-day public review and coirunent period ending March 29, 2013 in which.we find unreasonable to reviewa 559 page report. We DEMAND tliat the City of Chula Vista exercise its SANDAG votes to EXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD for a minimum oY'Six (6) months in which to provide SANDAG with studied input in support of our OPPOSITION. This petition is being submitted to Mayor Cox, City Counsel members and lheSANDAG Board of Dircetors~to DEMAND that they take action consistent with Chis petition and SUPPORT our request to reasonably EXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD in which to~properly respondto the SANDAG South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project. V V I P r f ~ Re'de c Nnn, ~ l..y t(,.I,~ ~t (j ____ r-~ ~ ~ ~1 i t x: s -I_~n _S ~__ ~t~t ~.. ("l_~52~! Y~ _~ L _ __ l N __-__._ U Y ___ _ ., S ~~ tore as R Uueste Cny 2,p ~,~C.~'' "~ '-"~ `?~12(hiC, VPUy`f C3~ 2. odor ~/ ,{~ RuidcnFe ~7 ,ne j/~ /(~ /L~~'.-'~A ~T.L!!S,._Amres ...~~J~~7_ .1~K~ ~.Vl_~. _ s4nsanv us //~ /~ Regncs~ ~i~C/ -- Ci,y 5~IJ D~~ Y'y 9 2 ~V 9 3 trio q~ ~~ (/~ A 1 Residanoa ~ ~ 1f, •m_ _.__Address____'~j_~'%__~~~.gS`~ _lA!yy~.~1._._..________..._-______ .__.. 1 LLB- IL°1~ l~ ~~~1 1V 1 - J ___ ___._- __ _ . .. Siimmnra as Requcunl ~ City Zip '~ i ~ !~ ~ ~ 9.Id Adddnre ~'[/,~. t/t'',~~'''!''. /f~t/_~ Name 1' ~' ~~~__~~ .. ~!--=-- --!____._.___ rt~s " ~ ._____ _ _ __ _ .____ _._ Si?ireuirr as Z,ip ~~~ ~(, Re9nenred t Ciry ~w l '-} - r / S. Prim Residenre [t . '^ ~.,~[t Nume ~~Q~~-t /p~J(~'q'~ AAdress /S~b~__/~a-~p~ay~e(~!T__.~~.1_______..__,__ Si~anuz xs Rc9ucc~rd Y Z` ei[ mow. pt p c~. 9z F.Pnm Residance Nome Addrzvs _________.______._. ._______.______.._..._________....______________.____-___.__.______ Z' S~amr ae Rcyues~ed (~iiY P ~ pvino Resld vice Name Addiyss Si~tvmre as Acquwnd CRY Zip g pd~~ Residence Nxme Addaes .__-________________-__________.__._-___ .___.__-_ ________.__-________. .___...___-_____ Sipiuwm ne Zi licquu[ad' Ciry P 9. Yrlnt Resideou Nome Adil ress Signazura ns Rcqucan[ Ciry Zip I i ~ ,f v .~ J .J We, the undersigned are residents of the Treviana at Lomas Verdes and Monet development in the City of Chula Vista. We are awaregfthe proposedSouth Bay BRT project being proposed by SANDAG. We are in.OP.POSTTION to the project on the following grounds: 1) the current plan calls for SANDAG to wedge a two or one lane bridge between the Treviana development andthe adjacent Monet development; 2) The bridge will have unreasonable and-negative impacts upon the Trevianaand Miinet development in the form of noise, air pollution, vibration, visual impacts and reduction inproperty value. SANDAG has released a Draft Environmental [mpac[ Report(ETR) for the South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project. The release of the Draft EIR has a 60-day public review and comme~it period ending March 29, 2013 in which we"ftnd um~easonable to review a 559 page report. We DEMAND that the City of Chula Vista exercise its SANDAG.votesto EXTEND the REVIEW PF.RiOD for a minimum of Sia (6) months in which to provide SANDAG with studied input in supporGof our OPPOSITION. This petition is being submitted [o Mayor Cox, City Counsel members and the SANDAG $oard of Directors to DEMANll that they tale action consistent with this petition and SUPPORT our request to reasonably EXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD in which to properly respond to the SANDAG South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project. L %inl - Ny,l~ <~..:,t~c\ \c~t~.~_\~ Nesidenca Addmss 'c ~t!~~-_l'',_:.rate-- -r=`==~'`'----~y==z-------- siy~n~lllc n, ' Requesle City Zip q 2. Pnm nn„e~F}?t/YJn:i-2 G~7`"F~'u ~• Residence nil ~: /`If1y~`C/1NG/Nt~7C_ /JG.. Gf3_Cl~'-L/L '$iywmrc xs ~. kcqurs4d ~ ~~~ , ' CiIY Gfh/v/1 ~iI $7. % ZiP c J / ~7 / ~3 N~~~~~-~~J .y~.~~~~%'"`." l~,r`li ~2ade~~~~~ ~Q~~~1~11/1,1 ~'~ t J~C~llt G?~? --- -~ -----r -_.- s ~ nn,e~ .. Rc, u~ .~~~.y (~~ - ` -- -~- ~~~tr'L~i ~ ~ 1~i- -~ ----- ---- - ~ p ~(~ ~II43 r" , 4. N' I "`: N ~ R d ce '1 ldd ss -wx /s ~r ,1J~ { ` "i~l¢4C D~WCa}V~z y . ..._ ` v S y R9 li'd~ ~.. ~~_~j CIY ~j-VV~GYI C'Wi~-t/ Lp lt. "L '41' S. Prins '~ nn ~-y~ // Nemc ~I PfC.00` DLrcU~~ Rnsidence Address Siymalllre 35' RC9nusleA ~ ~/~ Cfty l 1 l t~~ { ~~t ~~~ ~ ~ ' Zip ~ ~~ ~ r Nanlp ~. ~~l~i~ ~'~~ "{. y ~ Add l ~~ 1~5 ~h'vI YY i'~ / " 9 ~~(! lam!'" V7L4~j S iy t ca u ~/ a ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~l 1 f __-- -~-~. . ~.~~ T.'v ~ ~ ],Prime./ - tleeidwce Nnme Adhrcrd $ig"uhuc:6 Regneslul Cfty Zip B. Prin[ Residence Nnnie address --~-~-~--~- Siymalnrous Rcgnrsl"A Clty ~~P 9.Prim Rmidcnce Npnm AAdmss Si3"vmm xs Rcgnwmd, Clrv Zf0 1 e, the undersigned are residents of the Treviana at Lomas Verdes and Monet development in [he City of Chula Vista. We are aware of the proposed South Bay BRT projecfbeing proposed by SANDAG. We are in OPPOSTT'<ON'to the project on the following grounds: 1) the current plan calls for SANDAG to wedge a two Drone lane bridge between the. Treviana-development and the adjacent Money development; 2) The bridge will have unreasonable and negative impacts upon the Treviana and Monetdevelopment in the form'of noise, air pollution, vibration, visual impacts and reduction in property value; 3) The on iginal plan was to service the development with light rail that stopped short of the development; 4) the BRT is an outdated mode of transportation that is being abandoned by other cities in favor of Iight7ail; 5) the investment of $1.2 Billion in an outdated and inefficient mode of transportation is unwarranted; 6) the BRT EIR' is incomplete; and. based upon a regional EIR that is equally flawed; and,.7) Ylie people of Chula Vista deserve a better transportation system that they will actually, use and enjoy,. i.e., light rail. This petition is being submitted to MayorCox and other City Counsel members to demand that they take action consistent with this petition and oppose the BRT as currently proposed; and call for the elimination of the unnecessary and harmful bridge over State `Route 725. Until such time as the bridge option is completelyremoved from the BRT, wedemand that the City of Chula Vista exercise+its SANDAG votes in opposition to the BRT and urge other cities to do the same. l Prim /' ~/ /' Name l A~~l'\. Jif'. j~tPY ~ .~l '~ Res de oe Address (~(} t,,, ~..f~~Ct_•1 G~.~ ~t3lJ ~CL.fk.l Vlt 7U ....- 4 . $ gnalure r Re nested (LAX 1'i, t y~- ~~ _ _______ ~.~ Y ~ ~~ CI ~C I ~~ GI U.I tl Zi 2'. Print ~ Name 7 ' l~ ~ -----~!l~R, L ~----_Y--~ - --- -- Residence ry Address ~~ ~ylt ~~~~ ~" ----------- --- --- ---- ~~------ ------~- --- ----------- ------ ~ Sibmau¢cas ~ ' ( ~ C~~~i3 '.R ~ t'd C ry ZiP i Ninl l L IJmse ~e 14. fJ~j N n / 0rL !~i P Rcsidence Address jj-- {~ r ~~ ~ ~~yyv}.QrnLiL® C~*-~ ,.[./N ... _ _ __. _/~ _--- _ _ -_._-- Signature as /1 _ " ^'~" R nested t.Slr Cit ~. ~q/ r ~~+ '~f,as', Ls'!J Zi _ ~ / ~`~ / ~ a Mme _1004 S rY1 t~5~ -1~ :r _.~ ~ J ._ - naa ~~sc~ - `~ ~C ~,j ~~..~1m.t2t~ ~L. ~-- ~+1,%~ ____--_. ~ -_ ____- ... d /p ~ S 6 afrt[e ns ~ }~.~~ . ~'7i/~.l ~'~jl,~~C~~ f f , R aested ""~~'/t_i~~i(f/ Ci Z~ [ 5. Pn t ~ Name (] ,+ 2p~~ ~t~~tt'~ l~~~Z R 'de me Address . 0578 IY~~L~~--` ____ _ _.. _ -~~_____~ _-__-_. ~ _ -_ . _. ~ Signet nc as Re nested tw ~ tit. _ Ci ~ ~ ~h /^ LJV"r Zi ~ ~ ~ t 3 1 6 p~„t j nn,/^ q~^(~ /' 1 `.V~ /lJ2/ ~~' /~ Name ~~/i fl~'l. R sidence Address ( - L I ~j ~ ~ /W f.U V"V~~ (/1 __ _ ( / R nested Z~ '/. Prin[ + ,.~,rr' y~ [ ~ Name. ~K!`I 1 1 ~--sl. ~VL~ Res deuce Address _~~.tL-..,.c ..... 1iS lr7 l~W`'~ln.l- `~' Signature as b - _ - ~-- ~ /'~ Zi ~ t l , 7~. ~'~ 'Re aested Cit , ( g pdn~ ~ N.une ~ 11rr ~ Residence Address `~ -- - ~ ~ W4r. ~~;..."~/' ~~Q- V 1~ii1~.~ Signature as trr,v, ~ ~V vr' 'Zi l `t J Ro aested . . . - 9.Print // /~ Nnmc LYl"~.G~f3 f~(J/"/{7 v Resdrnoe Address ~ '-'/~/'~~~~ ~ ~/' ~ ~~ ._._ SiEneturc ns / /`~ "`~ _ ___ ______ `' KL~ Vi~ry+-~ 7 ~~ / _ / Re aested ~ / ~ Cil . .~ ld: dim /// t.1 i j9 .~ an~e ~ tl~~~ i ~~ t t-~~~i; Re denoe Addmss l ~ } ~ I r' /~ ~ ~ F ~ fd/n'l i Y l ~ C) I 1 <. ~7 Gt rA:+' v S tnanno s f'tf2 qq R 9 d -{f/L LN t =}~ C n, ~ ~t r . . ' Zi `~ .. I i .~ t fA l J S s ' J ~-~~~ k I i ~asY4'~ i I G e, the undersigued are residents of the Treviana at Lomas Verdes and Monet: development in he City of Chula Vista. We are aware of the proposed South Bay BRT project being proposed 6y SANDAG. We are in OPPOSITION to the project on the following, grounds: T) the current plan calls for SANDAG to wedge a two orone lane bridge between the Treviana development and the adjacent Mm\et development; 2) The bridge will have unreasonable and negative impacts upon,the Treviana and Monet development. in ills form of noise, airpollution, vibration, visual impacts and reduction in property value; 3)"The original plan was to service the development wit]S light rail'that stopped short ofthe developineht; 4) the BRT is an outdated mode of transportation.that is being abandoned.by otter cities in favor of light rail; 5) the investment of $1.2 Billion in an outdated and inefficient mode ofttansportatioh is unwarranted; 6) the BR"f EIR is incomplete'; and based upon a regional EIR that is equally flawed; and, 7) tha people of Chula 'Vista deserve a better transportation system thatthey wilLactually use and enjoy, i.e., light rail. This petition-is being submitted to Mayor Cox and other City Counsel members to demand that they take action consistent with this petition and oppose the BRT as currently proposed, and call for the elimination of tha unhecessary and harmful bridge over State Route 125. Until such time as the bridge option'is completely removed from the BRT, we demand. that the City of Chula Vista exercise its SANDAG votes in opposition to the BRT and urge other cities to do the same. L Print Ree~do cc Name ~ Addass ~--' ~---- . ('~ Sigiinmreu . R nested ) ' ~' ~ /,2 Lti: ~ ~ G> ~~'~' Z 'l 2. Print p Residenca~ ~ , Addres's_ Name ~ ~ ~~~.1~`}..,....~J..~'1 ~__~1_~~Q____~~ !._.-__~~~~Q _~ ~ _ _ __ . ___ ___ ____.___ ISigna[uro as' mss- ~` ~~~~ ~ ' ~~ ~ it I- ' Re nested q ~ m 9 /\~ Rcs~deiice ___l___7_t_~~('dfrsry'/ _. 1~ Address Lt"'!. ~~ ~l~~jCtrtt~ Nnne ~'" C2 + - _ j ___._~ ____- - ___ _. ~_ tmamre nS .'.{'l ~' t~ f t Zi 1 1 r V RBIIeatCd C 4. Prim Residence - ~jOI~B+I MOSS Address 1R I5 Gld vnirsirb~}c% L.~^ ~C.'+'~tiZ. Name ' __ __-___ . . .._._ C' _ _--___-. _.______ Si~,nntnre as (,c..S,-. ~-~-y--~ G' 6~1.i1 G ~/ ISfQ li G l Gi l'3 . Rer ucsted 5: Prim R dcncc (~ Namo ~',~.Jlf9 t.J 11.~G•r-1 Address j 1 ~.~ ~-%~-+'N//J ~jU ~~~ ~.~ (,y~U Z. Siymnmre as ' i ~~lo+L~}'.' UU.~ C:FF Z, /~~Y ~.3 ~ ~ Rer uestcd -- - ' 6 Pent / Ras deuce / ^] o Name \~ OJ=\... /-` (~ l.M1't Address. '1+~ (/~~,. L1d_til_1111 ~.!'_`-L 143 "~~Ul Z 111 /C, 1, ~..// ___.....____ ___. _ -____-______-__ _ ...... /', ~ ( Sibmmure es ~ ~ `/ ' Zi> ~ I t C ~ ! __ ~' "1 l-~ - t/t-.. Ci 1, R ucs1M Y 7. Punt IJ ,r Residence ,~ pn / ~ i~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~_ ' Name ';:y ~<''l~ ~ f.~y~ Address /i J_~,y~ C./}•6'n•~ ~/ L~ __. Si6nnnve as ._ __ _ __.-__ _ _.... 2' ~/CI~ ~ Gi ~ ~- / t Re ucsted k Prim ~ (' q Residauue / ~C~ / r CI - ~ ~-/~ Name ~r;1 (~D l~ C~ ~ ~ S-_e~UZ..___-_ _ 17 (~ 1/~ 1~~ t [, ~r I ~~~ __Addass ~ _ _ _ -( ~3 "/'~- Ca~~~'~ U A 11''~ ~..(~. Zi G ~ ~. /~~ ~s -~ Gt (G Re ues ed R sidcncc ~/ /'' 9 Prmt / f > Namo /.~, ~%L ~~/fii//~ Address ~~~ ~gf~7s'~'N ~ f'~C. IfF C i7T~~i.- -_-- S tiinlure as~ / /'I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~~3 / _ „ Ci " ~ R., nested i Cpl/' - 1 I0. Print ^ Residence \ ' Address_t (~Q~"]__ f: a.(~1 .1 \~-~_ ~~~. ~_.__~~~Z________..__ ~j~v~S Name ~ys iJ'_ 1~ ~ 1- ` l__ L~ - _ ~ ~rN _____ ~ Srynauve as ' L3_\.. ~' Z~ ` R ucsted - '` e, the undersigned. are residents of the Treviana at Lomas Verdes development in t}ie City of Chula Vista.. V/e are aware of the proposed South Bay BRT project being proposed by SANDAG. We are in OPPOSITION't6the pro~ecYon the following grounds: 1) the current plan calls for SANDAL to wedge a two or oneilane bridge between the Treviana development and the adjacent Monet development; 2) The bridge will have. ttnreasouable and negative impacts. upon the Treviana d'eQelopment in t1Se form of noise, air pollution, vibraCion, visual bnpacts and reduction in property value; 3) The original plan was to service fhe development with light rail that stopped shorC of the development; 4) the BRT is an outdatedmode of transportation that is being abandoned by other cities in favor of light rail; 5) the investment of X1.2 Billion in an outdated and inefficient mode of transportation is unwarranted; 6) fhe BRT EIR is h~complete; and based upon,a regional EIR that is equally flawed; and, 7) the people of Chula Vista deserve a better transportation system that they will actually use and enjoy, i.e., light rail This petition is being submitted to Mayor Cox and other City Counsetmembers to demand that they take action consistent with this petition and oppose the BRT as currentlyproposed, and call for the elimination of the unnecessary Ind harmful bridge over State Route 125: Until such time as the bridge option. is completely removed from the BRT, we demand that'the City of Chula Vista exercise its SANDAGvotes in opposition to the BRT and urge other cities to do the same. Nave AdJie ee ~.~ 1Ccl~.F~~.Y-.~tw~~ sa I`it5 iMf~sS~~.,~s, ~r~ ------ f/\} Slymnvoes f~~' ~ cd C Flv lr~ vi <>-t-~' ZIP Cl' ~ I Requs Icd n < 1 ~ )) Raslde ree 2 Punt Adtla s Na i ~_ 1 (U~ ~f ~^{~~ _ } -_- ."--"-_ y t -_ L Slgnalura as//' 1 t~ ..l (_s/t~~lYl / / 2 Zp f Qrv R ~" ~ ~~~ e ugne> .. ~! cl~Dl Jl ~~~ ~ -~~/ / 3 l tt t ~7 R ndince / ( /+ Noma ~ / ~~- ~ u gdrns. ~\ ~ ~I~tijNl~ 1Y ~l-L( l_. Z._ ~~ 1111 t~~ -- - -- ~ - -- --- -- ~~' ' '~ _ - -- -- - - --- --' SE hre as~ Requu~ed Qty ~ Z p q 1 ~ ~ .._.. Re'ideme / /''~ '. _ ti _ Name 1. t~ ~'\h ~''J ~~~~ Address C ~--~ ~_ C/w'7 ~1r-1J ~!~` -//C~ _ t -~~ .... -- _~ - .............. .._.. ....---- _. .-.._- i ~ Clty P RCQuOS'CCd ~ ~~ ~ ZI ~ ~ i ~~"1"."" ~i (~JV / .3 V ' , - / cam. ke 'de. ~. -y 5 N~nt /./' q~ ~ ie/ ! ~ YV ~:1~`~r~_V'~' ..---_Add ess l~°~~~/~..d1"'.1 ~1~b ~-l,rn ~i~~__~r ~-t ~_5---.-_._------ - siyna //re ey/ `//'j ~ / r~ ~r ~r 2e91`cstSd" j/.._~___~-C--"/ City l~i~~l". V1J ~fl r~ ZiP +f I'~ ~~" ° /~ Residence r 6-Print / Name ~QY"`Q.IIt~ 'L.l~.nt~'V1~ Address 1~~~ ~. Ct+TOtrst `~ ~E. l.p. ~M~ ~T~f~ _- -_.-._..--__-.~___.------__-_-------'~--3..------_---~_.---.------__------__._------------------ ------_.-------_---.-.-.---_--.-___---__..---_--__.--_-----_.--. Siynauve as Requested ,f ~~~ _"``^ eay~~ia~rti ~~s~'et G~ ~ ~~P ~ `1141'3 7. Print ~' Residence N51ne ~ -~ ~ ~ ~ Address ° C 1 $~~~la[nrC a9 p~ f' reeq~~e=md /` ary ~ ~~t rn ~~ C' z~P~l t ~~ `h 8 P I ~ _.r~/' Besdc f)~G C 1~ T l`~n p( Z Na ,.. ,5-f"(/It-yll, ~~L V t: 1/'."~ Add ess t ~ ~-~ 1.~.{I~~/t11 IV till.. L~ C.L,-V L.---_.._- ~--.__- .--- -__~ - -- -_ S y ran - ns . _ . Request I ~~ _._ ~_._ ._..,e~ '~ ZP f,,.. y H I t /~'i/f~. ~J// ~^ Re ido e .r, / ^ ~I Name {1 ± ~1` Ll~~/~.C ~C/v dre /%~ ~ C 'l~F'LC lV I ~'U - Ilt L.X . _':~~it ti -} . k y y .- -..... ~~~ y/~ Z~ /s ti IO. Prifi~ Residence Nnme Address $IBnAIUrC A9 lEegncsmd Clrv N V J I 1 e, the undersigned are residents of theTreviana at Lomas Verdes development in the Ciry of CImIa Vista. We are aware of the proposed South Bay BRT project being proposed by SANDAG. We are in OPPOSIT30N to the project on the following grounds:. 1) the oitrcent plan calls Cor SANDAG to wedge a two or one lane bridge between the'rreviana dev©lopment and the adjacent Mouet development; 2) The bridge will have wlreasonable and negative impacts upon the Treviana development in the forrn of noise, air polhition, vibration, visual impacts and reduction in property value; 3) The original plan was to service the development withlightiai[ that stopped short of the development; 4) the BRT is an outdated mode of transportation that is being abandoned by other cities in favor of lightrail; 5) the iuvesttnent of $1.2 Billion in.an oitdated and inefficient mode of transportation is unwarranted; 6) the BRT EIR is incomplete; and based upon a regional EIR that is equally flawed; and, 7) thepeo}Yle of Cfiula Vista deserve a better transportation system that they will actually use and enjoy, i,e,, light rail. This petition is being submitted to Mayor Cox and other City Counsel members to demand that they take action consistent with this petition and. oppose the BRT as currently proposed, and call for the elimination of,fhe unnecessary and harmful bridge over State Route 125. [Jntil sucfi time as the bridge optiou incompletely removed from the BRT, we demand that the City of Chula Vista exercise its SANDAG votes iu opposition to the BRT and urge other cities to do the same. I P urt. tt)) (( N . , L J~~l ~, ~ ~~~ R d nee I ~`'rt Add es : 1~~ t_ / ~ry~ ~/~ / ~, /} t, 1 ~`l.~.l ~. r~l ',~V l_..:: _~.. ~ 1 V ~ __... . .___ _ Signmuro as Reques+~ ~ _ ..... ~ .~~ ._ CitY e hula ___._ _ _ v. ~st~1~ Zip ~ ~ q i 3 2. F?'N ''{{p ~~'I N ~~ v~~ 1~.^-~tn/ ~~('(''~_[ r i:' ~T ~1 1 t Recid lice (y ^1 Add ess lY.~il ,,p r, ' -~ ('~ ~ (~ ~/ ~~I/~A~:N~ _t.J~ "'"'~.YiC)_~ _.. _.... Signahve es Requested 1 - -. - __ ~ _ City ~~r \ ~ q V 7Z _ y t~C t^p 7dp /'Y ]C'/f . "l' Y t l V J.Y l 3, Yrinl `\~ ,/~ Name ~:['~` l V '471 ~ l ~ ~ Rasideuce~. ^ "`l~ Address /~, ~ ) / ~ ~( {'~ ~ s,., ~^'}{~~~IJtI Sl__~____l.L~__~-1--`''_ _ ~ ..__ _. _ _. . Signumm u 2egilested 1 f +, p ~ ~ V ` V .._ . __ __ _-_ ___ _ City /~ f A~ o --f`l ~ r t Zip ~.1~ i V l t A. Prinr ]~ ~ Name ~l/7T ~. ~ = yy ~~ )) ~( ~ i NO.~ - - = Residen o ,y y~ ~ `~ Address ~ ~, ~~I.Tj'• (~'Z 1 ~1 Y''~~-/J "L~.'1'i-t L -1~-~J- ------- --- ------- -- ------ _ -- __ _.__ -- ------- $ignaaim as Requested / / ,/ i ---- - ----- --- /~ ~ A CIH C..%b'~1.(i(--%N p C.~ 2 V ~) ~ Zip ` ~ ~ ~ J S Pcinl f Residence Name Address Signature as. Requested CiN 7.ip 6. Pi'iN Residence Name .Address Signature os Requested Clty 'Zip Z.Print ~ Residence Name Address Signalum05 Requested Ciry Zip N. Print Residcrice Name Address Signamrd as Requested City Zip 9. Print Residanoc Nerve. __.. _____...___..__ __...____.__. Address ___.______ .__.____._...__.._. ._.___ __.__._______________ _.__ Siynamrens Requested . _ City Z' P 10. Prim Residence Name ___....___ .__ ._ ._...._.__.._.__..__.__. _. Address ....___ ____.,.._____.._.__.__. _..._.._...._._._........-. . __ _ ...__..._._________ Silmamm as RCgnCStcd _ Oty P ZI 'yi 1 - We, the undersigned are residents of the Treviana at Lomas VerAcs development in the City of_Chula Vista. We are aware of die proposed South Bay BRT project being proposed. by SANDAG.. We arc in ~ OPPOSITION to the project on the Following grounds:l) the current plan calls for SANDAG to wedge'a I two or one lane~bridge behveen die Treviana development and the adjacent Monet development; 2) Tlie i bridge will have unreasonable and negative impacts upon the Treviana deyelopment.in the form of noise, air pollution, vibration, visual impacts and reduction inproperty value; 3) The original plan was to service. ~ the development with light rail that stopped short of the development; 4) the BRTis an outdated~modeof t transportation that is being abandoned by other cities in favor of light rail; 5) the invesGnent of $1.2 Billion in an outdated and inefficientmodeof transportation is unwarranted; 6) the BRT L-IR is j incomplete; and based upon a regional EIR drat is equally flawed; and, 7) the people of ChulaVista deserve a better transportation system that they will actually use and enjoy, i.e., lighti~ail. This petition is being submitted to Mayor Cox and other City Counsel members to demand that theytake action ~ consistent with this petition and oppose the BRT as cuYrently proposed, and call for the elimination of the ~ unnecessary and liarmfid bridge over State Route 125. Until such time as the bridge option is completely removed from the BRT, we demand that [he City of Chula Vista exercise its SANDAG votes. in opposition to the BRT and urge other cities to do the same. J -- 1 P::L hams y~C~~~ `('" ~l Residence Address C ~ Y ~ 1 l./9-1`.~ p',, ,l pr'`s- (~~ / ~ ~~~~/-~ __.____ Sipnanrre aS J' ~ ~~ Requested ~~ .___ 'City y ' _ ZIP '~ J ~"`G 2: IAint Residence Nan:e Address SlRnatnrC'a6 Requested City ZiP 7, Print Residence Namn Address Signature as Re9tto6ted Ciry Zip 4. Print Residence Marne Address 'Signature as Requested City ZiP . 5. Print Residence Nanre .___._____.__..._____.._____________ Atldress __.___._________.__ ..___.______ _ Signnture as Rcqueetod Ciry Z 'P 6. Prim Residence Name .__:.______... .. ____._.____..._____._ Address ___.______.____._._ .____._. _..__.____ ___. . _ _.____ Signxartc as Rcgnes'md_ City Zi P ]. Print - - Residence Name ..__________.________ . __ _..__._.__.__ . Addmss _____.________.._... _.______.___ _.__. .___. - , . _____ _ Signorine as L Rcquestcd CLLY r P ' R. Print Residence Name _.___._.__.._____..__._. Address ________. ._______.___. .___._______._______.. __._.____._______..___ Signn[iire ns Rcyuesmd C 'rY Zi P 9. Print Residence Nnn¢ Address SignnWre ns i ' ZiP Requested C ry 10. Print Residence Nerve Address i SignaRae as d Ciry Zip Rvquccm ~,/ €I ~~ e, the undersigned are residents of the Heritage Station region of the planned South Bay Bus Rapid Taam9k in the City of Chula Vista, CA. SANDAG has released a Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Froject. The release of the Draft EIR has a 60-day public review and comment period ending March 29, 2013, which we fend unreasonable to review a 559 page report. We DEMAND that the SANDAG Board of Directors EXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD for a minimum of siz (6) mouths in which to provide SANDAG with studied input. We further DEMAND that the City of Chula Vista exercise its SANDAG votes to EXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD for a minimum of Siz (~ months in which to provide SANDAG with studied input. This petition is being submitted to Mayor Cox, Chula Vista City Counsel members and the SANDAG Board of Directors to DEMAND that they ffike action consistert with this petition and SUPPORT the request to reasonably EXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD in which to properly respond to the SANDAG South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project. I. Narnte f n L- ~U ~ t'V`/ ~M.v __~_--- A~ddtdesce ~ 7~u/ ~ ~~ I O ~ P~ --~ Signaure m Requested ~'~-< - , / City C'',!~ CA V t 5'~ fy ~P c, 2 -~ / ~ 5 / / 2. Print - Residence _Neme ~_ ;~~ Q ~~~, ~~,~ I ~ ss (Z~ ~ - KAYL+ 1.1 `k~` {~ T 7 Ni ~ ~ 1 r Signauue as - - Requeued City 7]p 3. Print /,l Name ~~ Residence Address ~ ~ ~ ~'~" ~.~ //~~ //{{hh - ~ 15 ~ I.~ , IL!Y ti _ Signaure as . . Requested City ~1'~ ( j1 ZP .t'~ V ~ i~ 4. Print Name J.Q WI /'i O h~Q S Residence AddM.e ~ /~ 0 !? ~ ~'} ~I U(~, Sigomure ns 1 /? / o%~~-~ Requested ~'~~ Wt~' Q/ / 1/ City ~ / /~ v ~S L Tip I vG- Gt- (.s / C r 3 I 1 / U ~ I S. Print ~ N®e L_O~(ZAtaL c-tILLE(Z Residence Address 1'-t U`~t /r, rJTIOCI-1 Signaure m M ~r R nested Q (, \ ' i 1 j) _ SY\ n 1~~1L.K ~ `k City e. i-t.., L- fa v ~ Sri f~ ~ a I ,13 . - ~ t A ~ 6. Print Name l ~` Q ~ ~ ` ~tj __ Residence e, Addrett \ ~' J 1 ~~~ ~"1 U ~ ~i // .~F .I L __ Signaure as Requested City C. I ~ ~. ~ ~•S ~ LP ~ 7. Prim ~{ ) Residwa // ~/~/t ' Name ~t _Ct'J3'~//.e~j~G ILISAddres ~`r•~~ //~1/~/i~~Ji "~ l~~ _-~ Signature as 7 i Requested City ~ ' ~ 7yP Caur a !//s ~ n ~ ~!I ~1 / C/ ~ 3 8. Print Name / J i%' ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 Residence Address ~ ~ 1 ~ (1 '~ I t U ~ y {~ V ~_ Signature as _ ____ Requested City yiP CI~ULA ~(ISTR ~A °t1~11~ 9. Print r~ ~ /~ {~ r ! I -Name 1 vl~~ 'J W L~~~I. .1~~ t l Residence /~ t, yC A ~~ ~ ~ ~' 11 ~~/.11 GIl Signature as Requested ! s City n I1~1 ~ ~' ~1 ^ y+P l ~ L I!1 (1 i I r'~ 13 10. Prim ,/y, Nmne /7 ` / _ M~__ Residwm t~/~' //~ Addtese _I ~I+/a~ ~_ .CI.. ~ ~ __--~ _ Signature Requested A h, I ~ r 1' .~ ~ 7~P Ci V /7 / ~ ~ //i l • V ,V v ' e, the undersigned are residents of the Heritage Station region of the planned South Bay Bus Rapid Transit in the City of Chula Vista, CA. SANDAG has released a Draft Environmerrtal Impact Report (EIR) for the South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project. The release of the Draft EIR has a 60-day public review and comment period ending Mazch 29, 2013, which we find unreasonable to review a 559 page report. We DEMAND that the SANDAG Boazd of Directors EXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD for a minimum of six (6} months in which to provide SANDAG with shtdied input. We further DEMAND that the City of Chula Vista exercise its SANDAG votes to EXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD for a minimum of Six (f7 months in which to provide SANDAG with studied input. This petition is being submitted to Mayor Cox, Chula Vista City Counsel members and the SANDAG Board of Directors to DEMAND that they take action consistent with this petition and SUPPORT the request to reasonably EXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD in which to properly respond to the SANDAG South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project. 1. Print ~-~~ ~ ,7 '-~ Residence ,//' Nave ~1_L..11'~I~L tJ L,.CJ ~~.. Address ~ ~L `I ~ j~ % LJ~G~\ Signature as -----____..__~_ Requested ~"y C.. K~ ~ ~vl sr- zP ~ 2 Name L' 1_~_r ~~. `a ~L`y, J f ~ Addressce _ i a y 3 ~ -fk%~~ 5 ~-- Signature es /' ~ ~ J . Requested _ City (.--L~~2. `/, 2.-f'G ZaP ~ l /, ~' V J "I ~ 1 ~-~ 3. Prin _ Residence "~~~~~-f/~ _` ~////'/~~~, j~_ {) ~ ~ / Name _~ _~ __~~' `L?~~~-f--~ ~/ 1 ~ +"_'=i_T! / `~~__ Signature es Requested .,~?' City \./ Z-a `r ~l ~n `.'{~i yP ~l~/ Y VLL( }l (( 4.N~te ~ ~ / ~ 7 r `~~S ReAddressce 4 Z~ 1 .(~,, _~~.p_~ G~` Signamm es ~( ( ~+ / ~ - Requested ~ V~ City ~.y1,Lt_~(A U ~ S~ fe1 y+P ~ 1~f 3 ~~~~TT """ VVVV ~--~'l'~`'' S. Print Residence Name'"....... ~ Gc c~ A v'e~ nddres: l ZZ~ lk~w f-~i ~K S i - --- --' signature -`----~----`-~ City / yip G~~~IG ~~(~- i/,1s-~~- ~- 5/ ~3 Name ~ =-'...L_`.1dZ •S.{Address C2 1 ~ f'~i-iY 1)(~'T~~_~ ~.-~~~J? - Signature ( ( \\° Requested ~ f ~. City ~1 _ ~ s. Zi ~ ~ .., P ~ ~f V ( ~. 3 7. Prints, Residence Nam T +1 lV7C^ l ~~--- Address ~ 1 l ~f'P .rte S~ , ` ,- _ - ` ~+ ~ -",-----° SlgnadlR 85 c~~!1, Q f y ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 C ; Request Ctry ~~.W-f V L~1 1 r.~' r~ ~P `' `' l 8. Prin ~~ Residence e ~ C r,_ ~ y . Name ` / Address ` \ t~~/ `E `~ -_ - ` r ~-1--~ 11_ eture as R nested City ``^ +\ Zi 9.Pti Residence Name ~ J ~/ nr Addresv ~~ ~ L .n ll ( d~~ ~~ 4-~_ ~ ~ ~1 ~%l _ _ _ _ ~ y -___ Sigfiatnre =v~- ~ 1 ~ --_____ Requested City n ~~G(, ~~t~tC~. yP ~ ~~ 10, flint Residence Name Address Requested Ctiry yiP e, the undersigned are residents of the Heritage Station region of the planned South Bay Bus Rapid Transit in the City of Chula Vista, CA. SANDAG has released a Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project, The release of the Draft EIR has a 60-day public review and comment period ending March 29, 2013, which we find unreasonable to review a 559 page report. We DEMANID that the SANDAG Board of Directors EXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD for a minimum of siz (6) months in which to provide SANDAG with studied input. We further DEMAND that the City of Chula Vista exercise its SANDAG votes to EXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD for a minimum of Six (6) months in which to provide SANDAG with studied input. This petition is being submitted to Mayor Cox, Chula Vista City Counsel members and the SANDAG Board of Divectors to DEMAND that they take action consistertt with this petition and SUPPORT the request to reasonably EXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD in which to properly respond to the SANDAG South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project. 1. print /` / Residence j Name ~ 1 Q Gam. {~/( sd!/ 0 Address 1 z f Z ~a" f (/VGI~C'. Y- fir -~ Signature az --_- ~] A //1 [/~ ' / / / Requested ' ~1 /, City ~p ~ f ~ ( 3 L ~l I L _ _ V • l \- h \ V Ij 2. Print Residence j L Nmne Gl. Q.s,s ~~~ Q ~Lv Address ~ a / 2 ~" (wCti#'~1" 's J I __ Signnture as Requested ____ yP G' /~ `fi~ lt ! 1/ r^ ~ity l~Yt ~/t./~ V (,~i ~ I / ^ ~ , - ~/ ~ ,r J Name ~'~./ 1 ~~ ~ L~ / ~-^ ~-' Addressce , z. z (J /~ ~N~ t I-~'~ Signature as `~ -- -- "'---___~-___ ~ V Requested ~ City ~~ ~~~tl ~yy~_ Lp ~ IGj I "` " 1 L / (11~~r----~~~~ >I F' 4. print / p, ~~, ~,~~ yn Residence ~~~Q _ ~{A ~/.~t- j SiFyarure as 1 ~ /~ Requcged ~ ~~tY ~y" ~ -a' 6 ,/a.-j a ~Z/'~p °i ~ ~ ~ ~ . 5. print Residence ' Nmne ,,,y ~~ Address ~Z h2 +Q7~(~/t'~J'i t''Y ~ /~JI77 Requested Y Z City G, ~( Zsp ~ ~ °l ~ ~ Residence ~Z 3 ~ ~ J , ~,~/ 6. Prim ,q. A' Name +~~~Ct /`~_ /''l iC rfJ Add~essTLU f'~~'ti- .__._ _~___~__ -~____________-____~~_ Sigtarure u Requested ~i7.y~ ... ~~ City C~ .r ~~ lip ~1 / /~ > 1. print Residwce ~ ~ (' Name // Address 1~Z~ ~. ~. r"t~e (I st ~ Gl'r~~ Ij' ~ .~ ~?rr f<r i.Ct O.S Sipmture as /1 , Requested City C~'^ l~ v\t~l,}-.~, ZiP r~dL(13 N 8. Print ~ -. J~ Residence /~ ~ A ~ [~ _Name hL-~Uly h. '-. .l~,~k~ Address I ~11-~~~ .d ~ 1/c tv~ ~1 U _ _ J~.- Signature as ' . R ested"- City yip -~ i` ~ _ ~-~%~~ ~-~-k%ua ~r~ loll 9. Rim .~- Residence SigoaN as Req ed t!~ / ~ CitY ~~ ~ L'~ ~ ~~Y~ \~ ~p C~ ~ I ~~// lll... Residence `, 10. Print (~(7 ~~jQ ~ ~ ~V j'i Name 1t~.1 4_' _~~~ ~ ~~ 1 l ~~ ~ ~ ~ ' ___ -_ ~_~__ $l~TBnrre 39 V ~ Requested /-~ Crty ~~ ` _ /- Z.tp ` IVV V \-1(~ ~ e, the undersigned are residents of the Heritage Station region of the planned South Bay Bus Rapid Transit in the City of Chula Vista, CA. SANDAG has released a Draft Environme~dal Impact Report (Fill) for the South Bay Bus Rapid Ttansit (BRT) Project. The release of the Draft EIR has a 60-day public review and comment period ending Mazch 29, 20] 3, which we find unreasonable to review a 559 page report. We DEMAND that the SANDAG Board of Directors EXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD for a minimum of six (6) months in which to provide SANDAG with studied input. We further DEMAND that the City of Chula Vista exercise its SANDAG votes to EXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD for a miuimum of Six (6) months in which to provide SANDAG with studied input. This petition is being submitted to Mayor Cox, Chula Vista City Counsel members and the SANDAG Board of Directors to DEMAND that they take action consistent with this petition and SUPPORT the request to reasonably EXTEND the REVIEW PERIOD in which to properly respond to the SANDAG South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project. t, erim f~ /~ Nerve /+'~I~r~ ,p~ 7 e / ~/::.i~/p. U ~7- L ? Recaenm Ad~.° l~(1 y^i~~dT.Y'~~'Cr i1~~ '~° f~ / ~ / ~ J / ~ - 2 ,/11ra /~ ~Q ~° 5/G < /;,, , , q~~ gyj d / 2.P~e /"rr~ /~'~./~~ l'~ /Y•Cti' ~- Ra p y ~~G-)C-~ ~~L~"t/'~~~~~. J / SI@teNtG~ off~ff ~ T ary Clai/~ t~., Tier. e-A ~ i'i ~~ / 3 ! %l ~~ C~ , - 3. Prim ~ - Nemc /~~~ ~ ~ Residmsz AddRCS Sipietme es ~ - Rry _ ~ ~~ a Nmmisc . G ~ ~- ~ d naaeseR o2lG A'fL+~'x{w` ~- ~~ m Requested Qry ^/' s~ //7/~l'tf//"t~ ~ /~ `~3 s. N~ ,'I ( ~jA2v~,tO L ~y~ `V - RA"°"ss~ ~ G ~~L~ ~ ~ _ ~ e../r.~ l~ Gr J Requested ~ ~ /~ ~ ~J ~p ~~ y~J 6ry v`"tf(~-. ~ /I ~j ~ ~J 6. Rim Residmm Nmnc Addmss Sipienve ss Requested City Zip 7. Prim Reddeem Nrmte Address Si~msuc o RequeACd City Lp 8. Rim Re4dmce Nmue Addstss SigeMVe ss Requested City Zip 9. Rint Residevee Name Address Si~NOm m Requested Rty Zry 10. Prim Residenm Nmrc Address Sigsmusess RaNWCd CtY LP