HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006/02/13 Board of Appeals & Advisors Minutes MINUTES OFA REGULAR MEETING
BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADVISORS
CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
February 13, 2006 Council Conference Room No. C-101 5:15 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Romo (5:35pm), Vice Chair Monahan,
Members Flach, Snider, Monaghan and Buddingh
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
MEMBERS ABSTAINING: None
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Brad Remp, Building Official, Tom Nikzad, Plan Check Supervisor, and Judi
Bell, Recording Secretary
OTHERS PRESENT: None
CALL MEETING TO ORDER: Vice Chairman Monaghan called the meeting to order at 5:20 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Members present constituted a quorum.
1. DECLARATION OF EXCUSED/UNEXCUSED ABSENTEEISM: None
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MSU Snider/Monaghan (5-0) to approve the minutes of regular meeting
of September 12, 2005.
3. NEW BUSINESS:
A. Addition of Climate Zone 10 -Higher Energy Standards for eastern Chula Vista:
Brad Remp, Building Official and Tom Nikzad, Plan Check Supervisor, presented an
overview showing a map which reflected delineation of Zones 7 and 10 in the City of Chula
Vista designating climate zones. Chula Vista previously was all in Zone 7 in the California
Energy Codes. Recently maps have been published that specifically identify where the
boundary lines are between the zones.
Because of the overall expansion of the community, portions in the far eastern areas of Chula
Vista are now identified as being in an area designated Zone 10. Zone 10 is further from the
coast and is less temperate and has higher average temperatures. There are also
fluctuations in those temperatures. As a result, the requirements for energy conservation are
more restrictive in that Zone 10 area. We have not publicized this yet. We are identifying the
specific date on which we will advise applicants about the different zone when they come in
for permits, etc. The owners of the property will be getting additional energy conservation
measures incorporated in their structures. Some of the requirements are not that much
different, but the developers need to know now.
One of the other areas that will be impacted are areas that have existing houses. When it
becomes time to change out the air conditioning or the heating unit, the existing duct work
has to be tested to confirm that it doesn't leak over a certain amount. Currently the amount is
a maximum of 6% or in the case of existing buildings it is an improvement over what it was
before. But, generally speaking everything new in Zone 10 is going to need to comply with
these new requirements.
Chula Vista has always been environmentally sensitive and promotes energy conservation.
Board of Appeals and Advisors -
Page Two
February 13, 2006
Therefore, once we became aware of the two zones, the appropriate thing to do was to
implement as quickly as possible.
Tom Nikzad presented an overview of what the requirements are. He distributed a handout
with tables which showed the comparison of the energy requirements for low-rise residential
buildings between Zone 7 and Zone 10. These are:
• Insulation Minimums: for the two zones, the insulation minimum is the same except
that Zone 7 does not require a Radiant Barrier (the plywood used for sheeting) and
Zone 10 requires it. Roofing makes a difference, i.e. with tile, less heatwill dissipate
into the roofing material. There is an anti-radiant paint and also a film which can be
applied to plywood to help keep heat out.
• Fenestration (arrangement of windows in a building): Glazing of glass which affects
the amount of light which comes through the windows. In the Zone 10, windows will
let less UV rays and heat in.
• Thermal Mass: (heavy (stone, concrete slab) and light (tile on counter cabinets or
wood for flooring).
• Space-Heating: Electric is not allowed and gas efficiency is minimal requirement.
We generally get high efficiency with gas.
• Space Cooling: Seasonal Efficiency Energy Rating is minimal.
• Ducts: Duct system may be the most important rule. They need to be sealed. It is a
requirement for Zone 7 and Zone 10. In order not to have to have sealed ducts, you
would have to have the higher seasonal energy efficiency in the Space Cooling
category.
If one was to go down the line and do all of these features then it is deemed to comply. An engineer would be
needed if a "mix and match" was desired. In the past five or six years, energy conservaticn has been modified
to be more restrictive by approximately 25%.
The requirements are in effect as of October 2005. W e propose to contact the developers to explain the new
zone to them so they can start planning for it now. Each development will be identifed by their zones. This
way when they come in for their permits, they will know in advance.
Also, Planning and Building has a newsletter which comes out quarterly. This information will be made public
in the newsletter.
Adoption of the International Building Code with the California Building Code amendments is scheduled to be
adopted and become effective on or about January 2008. There'is still work to be done in working with State
agencies and task forces to help provide some modifications. It is an aggressive schedule. There is a strong
push to delay adopting the 2003 version of the Plumbing Code which questions the Uniform Plumbing Code
and Uniform Mechanical Code. If it can be delayed, then the 2006 version of the Plumbing and Mechanical
Code can be adapted. There are not enough staff at state level to push these items any faster. The 2006 is a
different code with different philosophies and staff training is required. We're sending our staff to training now.
The Urban W ildlife Interface Code is being worked on. We're waiting for numbers from the consultant to get
overall costs. When the City's Open Space was setup, there was no maintenance program with it. Because
of the fires that occurred in 2003, the brush in those areas have to be managed in order to protect the
adjacent properties. We are working on plans to do that and we also looking at building construction
requirements for the actual buildings that are along those rims.
4. MEMBERS' COMMENTS: Mr. Snider announced that this will be his last meeting. He is moving to
Arkansas. Mr. Snider stated that being on the Board of Appeals has helped him to have a better
Board of Appeals and Advisors
- Page Three
February 13, 2006
understanding of the permit process. He has seen many changes and will continue to "keep an eye"
on Chula Vista's development.
5. CHAIRMAN'S COMMENTS/REPORT: None
6. BUILDING OFFICIAL'S COMMENTS/REPORT: Planning and Building will be moving to temporary
offices (old PD building) on February 15, 2006. The Public Services Building will be renovated. At the
end of renovation, there will be one centralized counter. This renovation is estimated to take a year.
There are now three openings on the Board of Appeals and Advisors and each member was
encouraged to promote membership to anyone who might be interested in a seat.
We are also in the process of staffing the Access Board of Appeals which relates to disabled access.
This board was set up by an ordinance several years ago, but has never been staffed. In a report that
was provided recently, there is a discussion which states that at least 20% of the population of Chula
Vista has some form of disability. The makeup of the Access Board of Appeals requires that a
minimum of two members be disabled. Other members will be in the construction areas and the
general public.
Some of the existing apartment complexes require modification to accommodate the disabled.
Generally, the federal requirements only apply to new construction. The enforcement mechanism for
the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in California is the federal government. We are responsible
for enforcing codes for California requirements. They are similar, but there are some exceptions.
Unless existing buildings are modified, additional accessibility upgrades are not required. A number
of these facilities that have been in business for a long time did not undergo any renovations or
modifications that it took to require a permit. They are in compliance with California code, but they
may not be in compliance with the ADA because the ADA has a higher standard which says if it's
feasible to do it you shall do it. We are looking to take a leadership role in looking at accessibility
problems.
7. COMMUNICATIONS (PUBLIC REMARKS/WRITTENCORRESPONDENCE): Planning and Building
has a newsletter which is published quarterly. The members of the board were asked to furnish their
email address so they could receive the newsletter each time.
8. ADJOURNMENT: Chair Romo adjourned the meeting at 6:10 p.m. to a regular meeting
in the Housing Conference Room on March 13, 2006.
BRAD REMP, C.B.O.
ASST. DIR. OF PLANNI & BUILDING /BUILDING OFFICIAL
SECRET~ARYA TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADVISORS
5~it~.
MINUT TAKEN BY:
JUDIBELL,SECRETARY
PLANNING & BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(J:\ Board of Appeals & Advisors FY 2005-2006\02.132006m.doc)