The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReso 2012-189RESOLUTION NO. 2012-189 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 2010-115 OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA BY ADOPTING THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION'S AUGUST 9, 2012 ACTIONS ON THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA LOCAL COASTAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1-11 AND ACCEPTING AND INCORPORATING MODIFICATIONS TO THE LAND USE PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista (City) and the San Diego Unified Port District (Port District), in a collaborative effort with the community began working on a comprehensive Chula Vista Bayfront Master Plan in 2002; and WHEREAS, the area of land, which is the subject of this Resolution is diagrammatically represented in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and for the purpose of general description is the Chula Vista Bayfront generally located west of Interstate 5, south of the Sweetwater Marsh, east of the San Diego Bay, and north of Palomar Street, including two temtory islands one generally located south of State Route 54 between Broadway and Fifth Avenue, and the other generally located on the west end of Faivre Street; and WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista prepared Local Coastal Program Amendment 1-11, comprising the Land Use Plan and Specific Plan, for submittal to the California Coastal Commission for consideration; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution Number 2010-115 on May 18, 2010 approving, on conditions, the Land Use Plan Amendment, and making certain findings with regard thereto, and directing the City Manager to submit said Local Coastal Program Amendment, including the Land Use Plan to the California Coastal Commission for consideration; and WHEREAS, the City Manager subsequently submitted the Chula Vista Local Coastal Program Amendment 1-11 to the California Coastal Commission for review, public hearing and action; and WHEREAS, on August 9, 2012, the California Coastal Commission reviewed the Local Coastal Program Amendment 1-11, held a public hearing, and approved Local Coastal Program Amendment 1-11 with suggested modifications to the Land Use Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit B and Exhibit C, respectively; and WHEREAS, the California Coastal Commission subsequently forwarded a copy of its resolution of certification, including all of the suggested modifications to the to the Land Use Plan, to the City Council; and Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 2 WHEREAS, the City Council acknowledges receipt of the California Coastal Commission resolution of certification, including all of the suggested modifications to the Land Use Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista reviewed the California Coastal Commission's suggested modifications to the Land Use Plan and determined that they are acceptable. I. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find and determine as follows: A. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed LCP amendments were the subject of the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the Bayfront Master Plan and Port Master Plan Amendment (dated April 2010) (UPD #83356-EIR-658; SCH No. 2005081077) (Final EIR) which was certified on May 18, 2010 and whereby, the requisite CEQA Findings of Fact pursuant to Section 15096(h) of the CEQA Guidelines and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) were adopted. B. CONSISTENCY WITH GENERAL PLAN AND CALIFORNIA COASTAL ACT The City Council finds that the amendment to the Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan, including the California Coastal Commission suggested modifications thereto, are consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan and the California Coastal Act Policies. The proposed amendments and suggested modifications aze based on sound planning principles and practices that will provide for the protection and conservation of sensitive natural resources. The amendment allows the transfer of development from the Sweetwater District to the Hazbor District, which is a previously developed and less sensitive azea of the Bayfront, leading to the development of a project that will minimize potential negative impacts. The amendment will also contribute to provide and conserve bay views and provide more direct access to the Bayfront creating better connection to the rest of the city and the region. This will open up the Bayfront for the enjoyment of residents and visitors. The proposed amendment will be conducive to the development of the Bayfront and the creation of a world-class destination for residents and visitors. C. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND ACCEPTANCE OF RESOLUTION The City Council does hereby acknowledge receipt of the California Coastal Commission resolution of certification, as referenced in the California Coastal Commission's Staff Report of August 9, 2012, including all of the suggested modifications to the Local Coastal Program Amendment 1-11 Land Use Plan, and accept the same. Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 3 II. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council does hereby adopt this resolution approving the California Coastal Commission's August 9, 2012 actions on the City of Chula Vista Local Coastal Plan Amendment 1-11 and accepting and incorporating modifications to the Land Use Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit B and Exhibit C, respectively, and incorporated herein by this reference. Approved as to form by ~- ary Halbei P.E., AICP len R. Goggins Assistant Ci y Manager/Director of Citrney ~-~" \ Development Services PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California, this 25th day of September 2012 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: Aguilar, Bensoussan, Castaneda, Ramirez and Cox NAYS: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: None ATTEST: ~:~ ~ 0~(.4~~ Donna R. Norris, CMC, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CITY OF CHULA VISTA ~~ 1 Cheryl Cox, yor I, Donna R. Norris, City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2012-189 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 25th day of September 2012. Executed this 25th day of September 2012. /~ ~ Donna R. Norris, CMC, City Clerk Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 4 LCP Planning Area EXHIBIT B Resolution No. 2012-189 Resolution No. 2012-189 5 Chula Vista Bayfront Local Coastal Program Amendment Land Use Plan Planners City of Chula Vista Miguel Z. Tapia, AICP Marisa Lundstedt P&D Consultants, Inc./EDAW` John E. Bridges, FAICP Jennifer Guigliano, E.I.T, CPSWQ, CPESC, REA Yara Fisher, AICP Jason Erlich Nick Larkin Kimberlee Harvey `prepared original draft dated August 2006 STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES California Coastal Commission San Diego Coast District Office 7575 Metropolitan Drive Ste 103 San Diego, CA 92108-4402 California Department of Fish & Game 4949 Viewridge Avenue San Diego, CA 92123 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 6010 Hidden Valley Road Carlsbad, CA 92011 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District Regulatory Branch 915 Wilshire Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90017 Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment April ZO'12 Land Use Plan 012-189 Chula Vista Bayfront Local Coastal Program Amendment Land Use Plan Table of Contents THE TABLE OF CONTENTS BELOW REPLACES THE DELETED TABLE OF CONTENTS ON PAGES IV-VII INTRODUCTION/OVERVIEW ................................................................................................. I-1 A. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... ...................... I-1 1. Purpose of Plan ............................................................................ ...................... I-2 2. Area Location and Description ..................................................... ...................... I-8 3. Chula Vista Bayfront and Subareas ............................................. ...................... I-8 4. Related Projects ........................................................................... .................... I-13 B. LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM OVERVIEW ......................................... .................... I-14 1. Coastal Act Provisions .................................................................. .................... I-14 2. Organization and Format of LCP .................................................. .................... I-14 3. History of Chula Vista Coastal Program ....................................... .................... I-16 4. Coordinated Planning Efforts ........................................................ .................... I-17 C. IMPLEMENTATION ............................................................................... .................... I-17 II. PLANNING CONTEXT ....................................................................................... ..................... II-1 A. LOCAL PLANNING PROGRAMS ......................................................... ..................... II-1 1. General Plan Bayfront Vision Statement ...................................... ..................... II-1 2. Goals for Development ................................................................. ..................... II-1 B. CALIFORNIA COASTAL ACT ............................................................... ..................... II-2 1. Shoreline Access .......................................................................... .....................II-3 2. Recreation and Visitor-Serving Facilities ....................................... .................... II-4 3. Water and Marine Resources ....................................................... ..................... II-5 4. Diking, Dredging, Filling, and Shoreline Structures ....................... .................... II-6 5. Commercial Fishing and Recreational Boating ............................. .................... II-7 6. Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas ...................................... ..................... II-7 7. Agriculture ..................................................................................... .....................II-8 8. Hazard Areas ................................................................................ ..................... II-9 9. Forestry and Soil Resources ........................................................ ..................... II-9 10. Locating and Planning New Development .................................... .................... II-9 11. Coastal Visual Resources and Special Communities ................... .................. II-11 12. Public Works ................................................................................ ................... II-11 13. Industrial Development and Energy Facilities ............................... .................. II-12 III. AREAWIDE DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES .............................................. III-1 A. LAND USE .................................................................................................................III-1 1. Existing Conditions ........................................................................................... III-1 2. Land Use Regulations Objective/Policies ......................................................... III-9 Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment i April 2012 Land Use Plan n ,.,.t...:,._ wr~ ~ni ~ 189 Page No. 8 3. Development Intensity Objective/Policies ........................................ ...............III-17 B. CIRCULATION, PUBLIC ACCESS, AND PARKING ................................ ...............III-19 1. Existing Conditions ........................................................................... ...............III-20 2. General Circulation and Public Access Objective/Policies .............. ...............III-22 3. Roadway Improvement Objective/Policies ....................................... ...............III-28 4. Public Transit Objective/Policies ...................................................... ...............III-31 5. Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation Objective/Policies ..................... ...............III-32 6. Parking Objective/Policies ................................................................ ...............III-33 C. PHYSICAL FORM AND APPEARANCE ................:................................. ...............III-37 1. Existing Conditions ........................................................................... ...............III-37 2. General Form and Appearance Objective/Policies .......................... ...............III-37 3. Bayfront Gateway Objective/Policies ............................................... ...............III-44 4. Architectural Edges Objective/Policies ............................................. ...............III-45 5. Views Objective/Policies .................................................................. ...............III-45 6. Landscape Character and Function Objective/Policies ................... ...............III-48 D. UTILITIES AND AREAWIDE GRADING .................................................. ...............III-50 1. Existing Conditions ........................................................................... ...............III-51 2. Utility Service Objective/Policies ..................................................... ................III-54 3. Areawide Grading Objective/Policies .............................................. ................III-55 4. Utility and Grading Design Objective/Policies ................................. ................III-55 E. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ....................................................... ................III-56 1. Background/Existing Conditions ..................................................... ................III-56 2. Environmental Management Objective/Policies .............................. ................III-59 IV. SUB AREA DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES ............................... ............... IV-76 A. SUBAREA 1 - SWEETWATER DISTRICT ............................................. ............... IV-88 1. Special Subarea Conditions ............................................................ ............... IV-88 2. Subarea Objective/Policies ............................................................. ...............IV-88 B. SUBAREA 2 -HARBOR DISTRICT ........................................................ ............... IV-90 1. Special Subarea Conditions ............................................................ ............... IV-90 2. Subarea Objective/Policies ............................................................. ...............IV-93 C. SUBAREA 3 - OTAY DISTRICT ............................................................. ............... IV-98 1. Special Subarea Conditions ............................................................ ............... IV-98 2. Subarea Objective/Policies ............................................................. ............... IV-98 Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment ii Apni zutz Land Use Plan RPCnhitinn Nn 'JM'J 1 RQ Page No. 9 LIST OF TABLES Table 3-1 Land Use Distribution ........................................................ .......................................III-14 Table 3-2 Permitted Development Intensity ...................................... .......................................III-18 Table 3-3 Landscape Functions ........................................................ .......................................III-48 Table 4-1 Subarea Zoning Types ...................................................... ...................................... IV-87 Table 4-2 Cross-Reference of LCP Planning Area Parcel Numbers and Chula Vista Bayfront Master Plan Parcel Numbers ............................................ ...................................... IV-91 LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 Regional Location Map ........................................................................... .....................I-3 Exhibit 2 Coastal Zone Map ................................................................................... .....................I-4 Exhibit 3 Jurisdictional Boundaries ........................................................................ .....................I-5 Exhibit 4 LCP Planning Area ................................................................................. .....................I-6 Exhibit 5 Land Exchange Parcels .......................................................................... .....................I-7 Exhibit 6 Subarea Districts ..................................................................................... ...................I-11 Exhibit 7 Parcel Areas Map ................................................................................... ...................III-3 Exhibit 8 Land Use Map ......................................................................................... ...................III-4 Exhibit 8a Land Exchange Development Cross Section 1 ...................................... ...................III-7 Exhibit 8b Land Exchange Development Cross Section 2 ...................................... ...................III-8 Exhibit 9a Circulation Map -Road and Public Transportation Network ................. ..................III-23 Exhibit 9b Circulation Map -Pedestrian Network .................................................. ..................III-24 Exhibit 9c Circulation Map -Bicycle Network ........................................................ ..................III-25 Exhibit 10 Form and Appearance Map ................................................................... ..................III-43 Exhibit 11 Utility Systems Map ............................................................................... ..................III-53 Exhibit 12 Environmental Management Map .......................................................... ..................III-58 Exhibit 12a Environmental Resources Map .............................................................. ..................III-64 Exhibit 13 LCP Planning Area Parcels and CVBMP Parcels Overlap .................... ................. IV-92 Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment iii April LtJ1 L Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. ] 0 CITLJLA V15TA BAYFRONT LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM -LAND USE PLAN- Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION/O VER V IE W A. Invodudion ...,~E~~E'FED' ~ - l. Purpose of P 2. Area Location and Description 3. Coastal Zone and Subazeas Related Projects Application of Plan Provisions D. Coastal Program Overview ........... ....... i- 1. W Act Provisions 2. 'raation and Format of LCP Re-sub ' 3. His of Chula Vista Local Coastal P 4. Coor d Planning Efforts C. Implementa[io ............. I- ^. PLANNING CONTEXT' A. Local Planning Programs .................... ^- I. General Plan Bayfron on Statement 2. Goals for Develop D. California Coastal Act .... .................. II- 1. Shoreline Ac 2. Recreation isitor Serving 'ties 3. Water an rine Resources 4, piking dging, Filling, and Shore vuctures 5. Com ial Fishing and Recreational 0 h. E nmenlally Sereilive Habitat Areas 7, culture B. vwd Areas 9 Forestry and Soil Resources locating and Planning New pevclapment 1, Cousml Visual Resources end Special Cotnmunitia 12. Public Works 13. Industrial Development and Energy Facilities Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment iv April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 1 l Table of Contents (conYd) III. AREAWIDE DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES A. Land Use and Development Intensity .................. [ 1. Existing Land Uses and Development Intensity 2. Land Use Regulation Objectives/Policies 3. Development Intensity Objectives/Policies B. Circulation, Public n ........ .. III- Existing Cond~L~~, General Circulation and Public Access Objective icier 3. oadway Improvement Objectives/Policies 4. g Objectives/Policies 5. Pu Transit Objectives/Policies 6. Ped and Bicycle Circulation Ob' es/Policies C. Physical For d Appearance 1. Existing '[ions 2. General For d Appeaza 3. Bayfront Gatew bjectiv 4. Architectural Edg bje 5. Views Objectives/Po 6. Landscape Character D. Uti lities and Areawide mg 1. Existing Condit 2. Utility Servi jectives/F 3. Areawide ing Objectiv 4. Utility rading Design ..... / .............. II[- [ion Objectives/Policies ................... III- E. Environme anagement ...... ]. Ba ound/Existing Conditions 2, ronmental Management Objective: IV. SUBA$~CDEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND ........... III- Subarea 1 - Midbayfront .................... . 1. Special Subazea Conditions 2. Land Use/Intensity Objectives/Policies 3. Circulation/Public Access Objectives/Policies 4. Physical Form and Appearance Objectives/Polices 5. Utilities and Grading Objectives/Policies 6. Environmental Management Objectives/Policies 7. Phasing of Development IV- Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment v Land Use Plan April 2012 Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 12 Table of Contents (cont'd) IV. SUBAREA DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES Subarea 2 - Indusvial Area ..................... IV- 1. Special Subarea Conditions Subarea Objec' °'ETED C. area 3 -Souther ............... ...... N- 1. pecial Subarea Conditions 2. area Objectives/Policies D. Subazea Inland Pazcel ............ ........... N- I. Spec ubazea Conditions 2. Subarea 'ectives/Policies E. Subarea 5 - Fai veet Parcel .. . 1. Special Sub onditions 2. Subazea Objecq olicies F. Subarea 6 -Palomar/Ba d. orI I. Special Subarea Con 2. Subarea Objectives! G. Subazea 7 - Sweetwate sh 1. Spacial Subaze nditions 2. Subarea Ob' es/Policics ............... IV- Parcel........ N- Wildlife Refuge ...... iV- Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment vi Land Use Plan April 2012 Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 13 I. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. List of Exhibits 1 Location .. ........................... . Zone with Subareas ......C....C............. . ~e Plan Map ..... ~C'+LE•T~a~........ ort District Concept .................. /. Building hts . . Circulation eni , Form & App Utility Systems . Environmental Mans Buffer Zone Section Conceptual "F & G" i ent .............~....... III- III- III- III- iII- [fI- III- III- Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment vii April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 14 Preface Although the land exchange between the Port of San Diego and private property owner described in this Land Use Plan (LUP) has not yet occurred, it must occur before this project can be implemented. Therefore, this LUP describes the exchange as if it has already been consummated to reflect an ownership condition that will exist following LUP adoption. Definitions Adaptive Management Review: This will mean review of the adopted Natural Resources Management Plan (NRMP) and it achievement of Management Objectives with the goal of adjusting implementation measures to enhance the management objectives. FEIR: Final Environmental Impact Report for the Chula Vista Bayfront Master Plan (SCH 2005081077, UPD Number 83356-EIR-658). PWCs: A motorboat less than sixteen length which uses an inboard motor powering a jet pump as its primary motive power and which s designed to be operated by a person sitting, standing or kneeling on, rather than in the conventional manner of sitting or standing inside the vessel. Wildlife Advisory Group: A group to be formed to advise the District and City in the creation of a Natural Resources Management Plan (NRMP), cooperative management agreements, Adaptive Management Review and any related wildlife management and restoration plans or prioritizations. Wildlife Habitat Areas: Wildlife Habitat Areas (WHA) s are defined as • All National Wildlife refuge lands, currently designated and designated in the future, in the South San Diego Bay and Sweetwater Marsh National Wildlife Refuge Units. These areas are included in the definition of Wildlife Habitat Areas for the sole purpose of addressing adjacency impacts and not for the purpose of imposing affirmative resource management obligations with respect to the areas within the National Wildlife Refuge lands. All District designated lands and open water areas in the Conservation Land Use Designations of Wetlands, Estuary, and Habitat Replacement as depicted in the Draft Precise Plan for Planning District 7. Parcels 1 g and 2a from the City's Bayfront Specific Plan. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 15 INTRODUCTION/OVERVIEW A. INTRODUCTION This document is an amendment to the Chula Vista Local Coastal Program (LCP) certified by the California Coastal Commission on January 15, 1993 and amended by City of Chula Vista City Council Resolution No. 17036 and Ordinance No. 2546. City Council Resolution No. 17036 and Ordinance No. 2546 adopted the California Coastal Commission's January 15, 1993 actions and incorporated modifications to the Land Use Plan/General Plan Land Use Element/Land Use Circulation Diagram/Parks and the Recreation ElemenUBayfront Area Plan and Specific Plan, respectively. This LCP Amendment is the result of two primary conditions: (1) changes to jurisdictional boundaries for the Port of San Diego (Port) and the Citv of Chula Vista (Gifu) resulting from a Port Master Plan Update and (2) changes to existing conditions and proposed land uses resulting from a land exchange between the Port and a private land owner. As described in Section B(2), the LCP amendment includes both this Land Use Plan and the implementing ordinance (Bavfront Specific Plan). The Chula Vista Coastal Zone (Coastal Zone) is located in the City of Chula Vista, San Diego County. California (Exhibit 1). Chula Vista is bounded by the cities of National City to the north and San Diego and Imperial Beach to the south. The Chula Vista Bavfront coastal area (Bayfront) is located within the Coastal Zone and encompasses the coastal lands from City's northern boundary south to Palomar Street and west of, and including, Interstate 5 (I-5). The Bayfront area also includes two inland parcels of land located east of I-5, one located on the south of the west end of Faivre Street and the other located in the northern part of the Citv. The portion of the Coastal Zone located south of Palomar Street, known as the West Fairtield Planning Area, is not included in the Bavfront area (Exhibit 2). The Bavfront area consists of lands under the iurisdiction of the Port and lands under the iurisdiction of the Citv (Exhibit 3). The subject of the LCP Amendment (Chula Vista LCP Planning Area) is non-Port parcels that are under the iurisdiction of the Citv. including privately owned lands and City-owned lands, within the Bayfront area (Exhibit 4). A private entity controlled a large block of land located in the northern portion of the Bavfront area near Sweetwater Marsh National Wildlife Refuse (LCP Subarea 1. Sweetwater District), which was part of a land exchange with the Port for parcels located in the central portion of the Bayfront area (LCP Subarea 2, Harbor District) that were deemed more suitable for residential development. The land exchange included the transfer of six parcels in the Sweetwater District from the private entity to the Port in exchange for four parcels in the Harbor District from the Port to the private entity. This land transfer shifted the iurisdiction of the four parcels in the Harbor District from the Port to the Citv and iurisdiction of the six parcels in the Sweetwater District from the City to the Port. Parcels involved in the land exchange are shown in Exhibit 5. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment I-1 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 16 The parcels within the Bayfront area but outside of the Port's jurisdiction are within the jurisdiction of the City and are included within the LCP Planning Area. Properties under the jurisdiction of the Port are addressed by the Port Master Plan. Although the jurisdictional areas have changed, the objectives and policies have been modified only to the extent necessary to reflect the modified land uses. 1. Purpose of Plan The purpose of the Chula Vista LCP is to provide a detailed plan for the orderly growth, development, redevelopment, and conservation of the City jurisdictional parcels located within the Chula Vista Bayfront coastal area. The LCP must be consistent with both local and state land use policies. First, every coastal city and county is required to prepare an LCP, pursuant to the California Coastal Act, to be approved by the Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment I-2 April 2012 Land Use Plan ~ Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 17 a 1 N ~ ~~~ - - ~ California \\ 1h ~; '~ She Location \\ A ~ V~ ~ 7 / s~~ J +- coy __ ~_ ~ ,! y-~.r Pacific r~~\ i. .. ~_ p Ocean Y~ \ ~. ~. ~1 1 ~. ~'.- - .~ ` t ~~ :~ Feet 0 3,100 8,400 4,800 19,200 25600 LCP Planning Area Chula Vista Bayfront Local Coastal Chula ~lista, California Exhibit 1 Regional Location ~.ee ~.. F~.~ Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment I-3 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 18 Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment I-4 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 19 Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment I-5 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 20 Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment I-6 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 21 Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment I-7 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 22 California Coastal Commission. The LCP must be sufficiently detailed to indicate the kind, location, and intensity of land uses and the applicable resource protection policies for development within the local coastal zone. The Land Use Plan component of the LCP must provide land use and development policies, which will ensure that development within the local coastal area will be consistent with the provisions of the Coastal Act. In addition, the LCP must contain implementing ordinances to carry out the policy provisions of the Land Use Plan. These are provided in the Chula Vista Bayfront Specific Plan, which serves as the implementation plan for the Chula Vista LCP. Second, this LCP must be consistent with, and implement, the City of Chula Vista General Plan, which is the primary local land use and development policy document. The Bayfront Specific Plan is a component of the City's General Plan and represents a step toward systematic implementation of the General Plan in the Bayfront. 2. Area Location and Description The City of Chula Vista was incorporated in 1911 and became a charter city in 1949. The City currently has a population of approximately 740 9A8 209,133 and covers an area of about 34 52 square miles. Geographically, the City is located adjacent to the east side of San Diego Bay, 8 miles south of San Diego's downtown and 7 miles north of the International Border (see Exhibit 1). The Chula Vista Coastal Zone currently includes a large amount of industrial development and the National Wildlife Refuge (Sweetwater Marsh and F&G Street Marsh). It also contains one of the last remaining large blocks of undeveloped land on San Diego Bay. Regionally, the area is served by I-5, the major freeway connection between San Diego and Mexico. State Route 54 (SR-54) and its interchange with I-5 in the Bayfront enhance the site's locational advantage. The Bayfront area is located 10.8 miles south of the San Diego Intemational Airport. 3. Coastal Z-0ne-ar+d-Subareas Chula Vista Bayfront and Subareas The boundary of the Chula Vista Bayfront area extends from the coast to just immediately east of I-5, except in the northerly portion of the City where it turns east (inland) along the prolongation of C Street to a point approximately midway between Broadway and Fifth Avenue and then north of the City boundary. The Coastal Zone and Bayfront boundaries are shown in Exhibit 2, #~age-I-4. The-fhi+la Vista-E;pasta€~oneis-cc3mpr+seddlhe-Bay€rc3nt--Planning-Area{Subareaa-~~aad~~,--in which-the-Laity-has-permit.jar+sdiclian,-arad-ihe annexed minas€a€-areas~n wlur#1l~e-Cali€ernia Coastal Gomissic>a taas-jausdiction.----The {~rr~visior~se-0ntained~a-lhe-plar~u~iU-oa€y-thas-app4yTO~he-Bay€ront ;?-taming-Area-: 7Jae~k~2-i31af}ai~-area-(lesat~~~ase} e~-sPf~e~aate4y-a-9~3-acre~`.~--`'ish--~48 acres aretaptands-oFtitled-areas above-mean h+gh-fide-and mare in-n~rr~.t°'zlaads- 4l>lete:-k~GP ~.~ acreages-~+re prev+d. a~~h~_x~e..°~~.~-a~~z,.~~n,m,-sa,~,~ °,~,#tized f,.-,~a:g~~° ptanx~ing-{cur{poses }--FoEtr~~aj©r-ownersh+ps-_dominate-ihe-plamirag-area-1.~-San-[liegs~a` -& ~l@6fnF..(~,e a€-tl'.~wR~ T-ef7d~-4Wt17-~~ "'° ~ 1 Dnhr Ins n fV.n nhr~l nf~~~g acaes~and-a+~addiiional6C~aeres-e€-Sar~Biego Unitied~ori 9isk€st-awned-land-$las-SBG~€-R9W acid-SB6~.€/MTBB-F~C~n~~~,e.-L-1 S-~~sh-and=A4ldl+te-Sewice-which scans -X76-sexes-(Same-e# whith-~a~~ttside-ftae-G+iy~}f-Chula-V+sta}an fwo-parcets~vhisb somryr+se-the-Nat+onal~^~ ~~'~{ ..° D°~~ 4 ~-Slu~la-Vista Javesiers-wl~ish-ewas-l-l~acres ta-the-sealraJ-pert+en~rent-aa~d-5}~ala Vista Redevelopment-Agency-which-owr~sagpreximaiely- J fi-mixes-ako-i+~-tJ~e-senka!- pn~tior~at fJae $aytrenL The wildll€e re€r=+ge-+taelades the naajer+ty-e€-6anpowder~oinf, D Stcee~FaU.-4he e++tire Paradise >/reek area-and4Jae. c~°•,•.~~°r-~~ex--(inslading-fhe-°€-6"~4reef-~ars~~he-Per{-~<ts Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment I-8 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 23 c,V'nf'n ..fl .. .. h'n of nll fhn •'flnin.,,lc I,' n 4.nf. ...~e_h'~7r1~~1 ~,F~.~I fl,..~«n~ t,n~~fn, ol.,n ,nfhn. fhnn fhn I r•o ;.., fhn r'f„ ~,~-flnr fnan'I'fn+o }4,o nl-. .,.V .V., nl„ ..f ..f tno Rm,f.n..} Th.. -,II nln hn 4.n nfl'nnfn.i '.. CvV.'h'f 7 ~ I ~ .. rl ~ n rincnr hurl hnin ., c I,.,.~„~~F Th+S~S- 2-~ar6d~~_na f.n.,, fhn r'f, ,.f c ,., n'„ 4k~e--Ra46m2f{(day f'I'-.o,J r I„ fn -+If n ~. f'n n.Vo ~. -.fn.,l lL. tL.~ \T/n~~~n Cnl~~ofn f~hcn ~afh h f nl~d~~~~n_i ini~n,~l Subarea ~ T#i~s~a+ea~+~sisFs o:-the-s}aajor+by- e# tJa0.-National lei+dl+te~etuae~rahist; is ©sakec-l~F-the ~nasFh-and~west-o€11+e-M+dda yfre•aY-4sa~are2.-~F The Chula Vista Coastal Zone was previously defined by subareas, comprising: (a) the Bavfront Planning Area (Subareas 1, 2, 3, and 7), in which the Citv had permit iurisdiction: (b) the annexed coastal areas (Subareas 4 and 6), in which the California Coastal Commission had iurisdiction; and (c) one inland parcel located outside of the Coastal Zone (Subarea 5). Due to changes in land ownership resulting from the land exchange, and in an effort to clarify jurisdictional authorities in a manner consistent with the Port Master Plan, the Chula Vista Bavfront area, covered by this LCP amendment. has been redefined into three districts (Sweetwater, Harbor, and Otav). The Sweetwater District includes the northern properties and generally extends south to "F" StreeVLagoon Drive (hereinafter referred to as "F" Street) and a small peninsular area at the southwest corner. The Harbor District is the central area and includes the majority of Port lands. The Otav District includes the southern Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment I-9 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 24 portion of the Chula Vista Bavfront area and is defined on the southern boundary by Palomar Street. with the addition of the inland coastal zone parcel at Faivre Street. The districts are shown in Exhibit 6. The three districts are further defined into three subareas within the LCP Planning Area for land use planning purposes The three subareas generally coincide with the boundaries of the three districts and are described in more detail below Only properties within the districts that are under the City's jurisdiction are within the LCP Planning Area subareas and are subject to the provisions contained in this Plan The Chula Vista LCP Planning Area (City jurisdiction) is shown in Exhibit 4. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment I-10 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 25 Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment I-11 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 26 The Chula Vista Coastal Zone totals approximately 1 345 acres of which 722 acres are within the LCP Planning Area (local coastal zone) 536 acres are within the Port's jurisdiction (Port Master Plan), and 87 acres are outside of the Bavfront area (West Fairfield Planning Area).' Five major ownerships dominate the Planning Area' (1) Goodrich Inc. (Goodrich) which purchased the land previously owned by Rohr Inc in the Harbor District with 79 acres (2) the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) which owns 316 acres in two parcels (Sweetwater Marsh and the "F&G" Street Marsh) which comprise the National Wildlife Refuge (3) a private entity which controlled approximately 97 acres in the Sweetwater District that was exchanged for approximately 30 acres of Port lands in the Harbor District (4) Chula Vista Redevelopment Agency which owns approximately 16 acres also in the Sweetwater District of the Bavfront and SDG&E which purchased approximately 12 acres of land from the Port District. The National Wildlife Refuge includes the majority of the area known as Gunpowder Point "D" Street Fill the entire Paradise Creek area and the Sweetwater Marsh Complex (including the "F&G" Street Marsh) As stated above the Port holds jurisdiction of over 536 acres within the Bavfront area. Although the Port area is within the City limits it is included in the Port's Master Plan, rather than the City's LCP. The Bavfront is characterized by a land use mix that balances coastal development and protected coastal open space Development associated with the land exchange will enhance this goal by facilitating the movement of development having more intensive land uses to those less environmentally sensitive parcels and placing less intensive land uses in the Sweetwater District This exchange also allows for large protected open spaces and buffer zones adjacent to sensitive environmental resources associated with the National Wildlife Refuge. Many of the Bavfront developed areas are also a part of the Chula Vista Bavfront Master Plan (CVBMP) and the provisions in the City's LCP and the Port Master Plan establish the guidelines for redevelopment of these areas. Land parcels in the Sweetwater District currently zoned as open space USFWS property. Parcel Area 1-q and a portion of Parcel Area 3-k (see Exhibit 7 in Section III A) are planned to remain as open space and the City Park (Parcel Area 1-f) is to remain zoned as Parks and Recreation. Thoroughfare and visitor commercial uses have been developed along Bav Boulevard between "E" Street and "F" Street South of "F" Street the Goodrich corporate headquarters and industrial facility extend to "H" Street The South Bav Power Plant and smaller industrial users are located south of "J" Street to Palomar Street In addition to these areas located west of I-5 one parcel east of the freeway is within the Bavfront and LCP Planning Area and is known as the Faivre Street Inland Area. This inland parcel is located south of the western end of Faivre Street and is currently used as a lumber yard distribution facility and open space. To facilitate the planning and development of parcels within the Chula Vista Bavfront under the jurisdiction of the City the overall LCP Planning Area has been divided into three "subareas" to focus on the issues specific to each area These subareas which correlate to the Port's districts, are indicated in Exhibit 6 and are described below: Subarea 1 This subarea is located generally north of "F" Street The National Sweetwater District Wildlife Refuge is located in the northwest corner of the Sweetwater District This subarea also consists of several parcels on the easternmost edge of the Sweetwater District (owned by the Redevelopment Agency of the Citv of Chula Vista San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&El San Diego and Arizona Eastern Railway, and private owners) located outside of Port properties acquired as a part of the land exchange and four parcels located in a peninsular area on the west side of Marina Parkway south of "F" Street (owned by LCP acreages are approximate values used for large-scale planning purposes. Chula Vista Bavfront LCP Amendment I-12 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 27 the Redevelopment Agency of the Citv of Chula Vista and Goodrich Subarea 2 This subarea is located generally between "F" Street and "J" Street Harbor District (including "F" Street and "J" Street). Most of the properties within this subarea are developed with industrial or related uses This area contains four parcels transferred to a private entity as a part of the land exchange that were previously under Port iurisdiction but are now under Citv iurisdiction The exchanged parcels are also part of the CVBMP area. Subarea 3 This subarea, known as the Otav District is located south of Otav Disfrict "J" Street and includes parcels located alone Bav Boulevard which are primarily developed with light industrial and related commercial uses under Citv iurisdiction. This subarea also consists of the small southern inland parcel on Faivre Street annexed to the Citv from the County of San Diego in 1985. This parcel is located adjacent to wetlands associated with the Otav River The undeveloped portion of the property characterized by native habitat is zoned as Open Space. The Chula Vista Coastal Zone contains parcels under either Port or Citv iurisdiction Onlv those parcels within the Bavfront area under Citv iurisdiction are included in the City's LCP Planning Area and are subject to the provisions of this Land Use Plan 4. Related Projects t~+ver- ~ler3,~ E,oaI~ oF-Fk~anf,e~~loint- GatTrarr~ kl-~.- Army ~,~s ©t-E~~~+;eery. Pro}eel-TJ~~&~t~F~~Save~waier-R+ve+~lea~-Ge+atre~ Shaaaet_is_8-}eiv~i SakfoK+~ia iJ~#naeni-©f-T{ar}s~ortat+ca4~- {F~a4trans{ , ~jitj~~a~n~_~ olf rn rnn~imr~4/A TD~rL~.~n~~ ~_ f 1hn ^n f n4 h I I C C h P \~/'LAI'f C .J i 14.o Qrn F..nf ~.n(1 of 1hn f~ntnro in-. ~'n.. 4n 1L.n n n4 I r`D Dn V....'}L.I There is one major project adjacent to the LCP Planning Area that affects the Chula Vista Local Coastal Zone and LCP provisions: the CVBMP and the associated Port Master Plan Amendment The Port Master Plan update and proposed CVBMP area project encompass properties adjacent to and within the City's LCP Planning Area The Port Master Plan and CVBMP proposed plan of development also involve the land exchange and the resulting transfer of iurisdiction of six parcels previously under a private entity's control from the Citv to the Port and four parcels previously under Port ownership from Port iurisdiction to Citv iurisdiction and a private entity's control The properties Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment I-13 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 28 within the Bayfront area not covered by the provisions of this LCP are within the jurisdiction of the Port and will be governed by the provisions of the Port Master Plan. B. LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM OVERVIEW 1. Coastal Act Provisions As provided in section 30500(a) of the Public Resources Code, "Each local government lying, in whole or in part, within the coastal zone shall prepare a local coastal program for that portion of the coastal zone within its jurisdiction." The Local Coastal Program is defined as "A local government's land use plans, zoning ordinances, zoning district maps, and implementing actions which, when together, meet the requirements of, and implement the provisions and policies of, the Coastal Act at the local level. The Coastal Act divides the LCP process into three documented phases: (1)Coastal Act Provisions/Issue Identification; (2) Land Use Plan; and (3) Implementing Ordinances. Issue Identification was completed in connection with the original LCP approval in 1986 and has not been included in this resubmittal. This revised LCP includes (1) the Land Use Plan and (2) the Implementing Ordinances (the Bayfront Specific Plan}. 2. Organization and Format of LCP Re-Stror~~ittal Theinitial-{aortior> taf-tlii&-L~ text-+sThe-Land lJse~lan-the ~ ^,_-~d~.~~ ~°~_Plaa-~udes4laree+aajer components:--1}antrodrrst+oa--P-tanairrg Gonte~rt--and-Ccaa --2) n.~a,.,.. ~'~ 9euelc~Ka<v+tOt3jeet+ves-aad?olicies~adz~}~,a#xar^~,-op~G esar~d o„r~-~,,.~„~^^ ThePc>lieaesef-f#eLandlose-Rlaa-wtttbe-rev+ewedby--the-State- - ttaaf~t3ey are-se+~sis{er+t-witJa~+e-fegE+irerr~enis~theC-,oastai-As2- AsterT#iis-irttradast©ry ~apter _t~„ ~~~' ~ ~~.;a-o-:an-p,~:,~° ^ ''~,°° „^,~~~e-GeasieFAst-Rel+s+e5 which are~etevant-tolhe-Bay#rerxt-identi#ies2xisking eo+zditiertswhiekt-per;airt #e-that.Petioy sategerY: arrd-e~+tl+nes-tkxe-L~-{~revis~~rr~leaaen~the-errasta!-pe4is+es--TJaese-pe{isies_are~pes+€isa14Y klenti#ied ica aid-ira suppcar~in~~he finds-ef~oastal,4st ~caasisteaay- The-second-conipenanY-et-this Paan-c-er~sists-cx#-t!}e~jectives-acct-p©licies-whie#are-irriended-to-be applied-ihra+rgh~+i-the €~ayireat-are-identi#ied---These lueawide-9bjest+ves aad~o4ias:.i: d into-five elenxents' ~-) l=arid-lase aad~ntensity-~~~ir~ulaNor~ar~Puhlis-Acces~3}~hysisal-Poraa~r-rd Appearanck:- 4 )- Uiil+lies-aa~Areawide grading:..and-5~€nvironmeata~ar+aye:r^ ^,,~..~€ash- ^~.-.~^'^^.t c:caniair+s a ;+irvey.-ot-existing-cnnd+ti©ris--rihjestives #or develspmenY -and-spepolicies~elat+ue-to that element:-This-see~ien isintended-t©-describe thee;positierxef~#te-everal4--Bay#re+itaad ensure taalhaanfflri~+anse--lhe-Eeaslal-Act-;='a.' ^~s~~-w~~~ ^~~^° °,^ ;sy with the-City-s-6eaeraL P~ Because e#~he-irxrportance af~t,e-"rxiandatery-andsonirolling=pelisies ©1 ##te-~f P-,-iheyace+auriabered separaieJy-aad +ridtsateduaiNi keld~ype{~eNsy fypefa<,e)- The~kiirds©a}parient-e~tA~ ~ ^~,d'~°a8kan--eeaiaiasarxarial~s+safcenditiens,t4evelepmerK-ebjestwes and pcalisies-whlr;h--are-respensiue#n-{he-~aigiae-rieeds~f-each--s+~area--TJie-Subarea--Specific Beveka prnent-9bj esiives-arid-Palisies-f©sus-the-areawiide {xolicies~The-i~ae-c~iaraeTeristics~nd needs-ei eash~lanr?inq-~^~~a_ and-pr-0vide._a .greater~elisy e#etailaite spesifi~~evelopment ise~+es Tkie see<and-pe#ien~if-~#e ~SP~e-suhrriiti~nl+s-Nae lrr~?leri he-la~plenientatiea Pregrarar as i+Nended#e implenient-the pelic~es ©#-x,`ae Landl~se-r'lan-thr©ugh{ievek+pnient~egalatic>ns and-standards #©r ihe-Bay#ron~The imple,7^,~n~' ^g erdiaance #or the~liuta-Vista€ay#rant i&-ikie @aytrant.Spesi€is-P-lan wl~# is adepted#ar+rsuant t~TiNe ~9-et-N~-Gti+~Ja~l+sta Mu+~ipat~ede {~e+ting 9+fi+riance3- AsTirevided-ui~Sestiuarx-3A51~e#Xhe~oastal-Act, the~ciniagerdianses~raing~+str+Et Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment I-14 April 2012 Land Use Plan - Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 29 69Rfen~i~YJ+t#. ,. ., a,,,. .,rte r,. ~ r r~,o .. ..t rti~ i ~.,a i ice., oi.,., This LCP consists of the Land Use Plan and Implementation Plan described in further detail below. Land Use Plan The first portion of the LCP is the Land Use Plan. The Land Use Plan includes three major components: (11 Introduction, Planning Context, and Coastal Act Policies Summary' (2) Areawide Development Objectives and Policies; and (3) Subarea Specific Development Objectives and Policies. The policies of the Land Use Plan will be reviewed by the California Coastal Commission (Coastal Commission) to ensure that they are consistent with the requirements of the Coastal Act. After this introductory chapter, the Land Use Plan presents a discussion of the Coastal Act policies relevant to the LCP Planning Area, identifies existing conditions pertaining to each policy category. and outlines the LCP provisions that implement the coastal policies. These policies are specifically identified to aid in supporting the finding of Coastal Act consistency. The second component of this Plan consists of the objectives and policies that are intended to be applied throughout the LCP Planning Area. These Areawide Objectives and Policies are organized into five elements: Land Use and Intensity Circulation and Public Access Physical Form and Appearance Utilities and Areawide Grading Environmental Mahagement Each element contains a survey of existing conditions, objectives for development, and specific policies relative to that element. This section is intended to describe the composition of the LCP properties within the Bayfront and ensure both conformance with the Coastal Act Policies as well as consistency with the City's General Plan. Because of the importance of the "mandatory and controlling" policies of the LCP, they are numbered separately. The third component of the Land Use Plan contains an analysis of conditions, development objectives. and policies, which are responsive to the unique needs of each subarea. The subarea Specific Development Objectives and Policies focus the areawide policies on the unique characteristics and needs of each planning subarea and provide greater policy detail for site specific development issues. Implementation Plan The second portion of this LCP is the Implementation Plan. The Implementation Plan is intended to implement the policies of the Land Use Plan through development regulations and standards for the LCP Planning Area. The implementing ordinance for the Chula Vista Bavfront LCP is the Bayfront Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment I-15 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 30 Specific Plan which is adopted pursuant to Title 19 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code (Zoning Ordinance) As provided in Section 30513 of the Coastal Act the zoning ordinances zoning district maps or other implementing actions shall be reviewed by the Coastal Commission to ensure they conform with or are adequate to carry out the provisions of the Land Use Plan. The Bayfront Specific Plan specifies in detail the permitted land uses and the standards and criteria for development and conservation of resources It contains the implementation plan for the LCP Bavfront properties (LCP Planning Area) as well as specific development standards unique to each subarea where required The Bavfront Specific Plan is consistent with and will carry out the provisions of both the LCP Land Use Plan and the City's General Plan. The Implementation Plan (Bayfront Specific Plan) includes seven major divisions: 1. Scope and Purpose 2. General Provision 3. Coastal Development Permit Procedures 4. Land Use Zones 5. Development Criteria 6. Environmental Management Program 7. Infrastructure Financing and Funding Mechanisms 3. History of Chula Vista Coastal Program This LCP Re-&~n}itta7 Amendment is the latest in a series of studies and plans that have been prepared for the Chula Vista Bayfront. In 1972, the City initiated a program to evaluate development options and prepare a master plan for the area. In 1972, Proposition 20, the Coastal Initiative, was passed by the voters of California. Proposition 20 mandated the preparation of the California Coastal Plan, which was issued in 1975. The California Coastal Plan and subsequent legislation established stringent review requirements for projects in the Coastal Zone. To respond to blighting conditions in some areas of the Bayfront, in 1974 the City established the Bayfront Redevelopment Project Area, which includes a majority of property within the Bayfront area. Many of the blighted conditions have been removed or redeveloped through the successful implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. The City began the Coastal Commission review process in 1976. A lengthy process that included additional environmental review and analysis, several lawsuits, and reconfiguration of portions of the plan extended to March 1984, at which time the Chula Vista Bayfront Land Use Plan was approved by the Coastal Commission. Subsequently the implementing ordinances (specific plan) were also approved in June 1985. Certification was challenged by lawsuits regarding the adequacy of endangered species habitat protection within the Bayfront and mitigation of on-site and off-site impacts. The settlement agreement concluding the lawsuit resulted in the creation of the Sweetwater Marsh National Wildlife Refuge, which includes property designated for the principal visitor-serving use in the Bayfront. The settlement agreement required that Gunpowder Point (designated resort hotel site), the "D" Street Fill (designated for marina, commercial, and residential development), and the entire Paradise Creek and Sweetwater Marsh complex be deeded to the U.S,-~ °~R--`^' 1d4i#e-Service USFWS. Eliminating these uses from the Bayfront Plan resulted in an imbalance in the land use allocation for the remaining developable upland property. Because of this, the City re-initiated a planning program to formulate a new plan for the Bayfront in 1988. This effort was curtailed when the major undeveloped portion of the property was sold and the new landowner expressed an interest in working with the City to prepare a new plan emphasizing amixed-use, visitor-serving development. Thi~LFP Re-!:uk~mittal- re#leels#kae-iaevwdevelepment concept-feuaalaied by the-r;iiy~nd 6haFa-Vista-Invest©rs. a+~d this-is-the-first~u~rehensive+iaa}or amendment fe-N~e LCF?~a/~s#~was-se#+#ied~n-1g8f.The current LCP Amendment reflects the changes to jurisdictional boundaries resulting from the land Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment 1-16 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 31 exchange between the Port and a private entity and the associated new development concept formulated in partnership by the City, the Port, and a private entity. This amendment is the second comprehensive major amendment to the LCP. The previous amendment to the LCP was certified in 1993. This resubmittal follows Resolution No. 17036 of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, which amended resolution No. 16838, and Ordinance No. 2546 of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista, which amended Ordinance No. 2532. 4. Coordinated Planning Efforts The LCP establishes the conservation and development requirements for coastal zone lands 4yJag '^°^ ~~~ ~' ' ^^ ' ^ ` that lie within the jurisdiction of the City and excludes properties within the jurisdiction of the Port (see Exhibits 3 and 4). ^^~.~~^ ^'^ ^~'' ^^* ^ , ~ti ^~° ~^''° ^' n° °'' The National Wildlife Refuge, under USFWS ownership, is part of the LCP Planning Area. Close cooperation between the City, the Port, and Federal agencies is necessary to ensure: • Coordination of road, water, sewer, and storm drainage improvements; • Effective management of coastal environmental resources; • Harmonious land use and development, which permits all portions of the Bayfront lands to benefit from the economic, visual, and recreational values of the waterfront site; and • Provision of public access to coastal resources. State law and good planning practice require that the Bayfront Land Use Plan address the relationship between the lands within the LCP boundaries and the adjoining Port lands. This is done by indicating where the continuity of public facilities (roads, water lines, sewers, storm drainage provisions, and pedestrian and bicyclist routes) is to be maintained, where protection of economic and aesthetic values provided by water-oriented views are to be protected, and where safeguards are necessary to prevent conflicts in land use and development. Specific aspects requiring coordinated action include: Rerouting and design of Marina Parkway it 1iaa-f~ic~naytrtx}6~rea; • Maintenance of a protected habitat for the least tem and other sensitive species within the National Wildlife Refuge; • Integration of pedestrian waterfront access; • Protection of existing water-oriented views from inland areas; and • A balanced mix of developed land uses within the coastal area of the City. C. IMPLEMENTATION As indicated previously, the Chula Vista Bayfront Land Use Plan will be implemented by the Bayfront Specific Plan per the California Government Code Sections 65460 et seq. The Specific Plan, +e adopted by Ordinance, x~~ will meet the Implementing Ordinance requirements of the Coastal Act. The implementation provisions will include: 1. Land use and development regulations and standards ("zoning' including permitted uses, parking requirements, development and pertormance standards, signs, etc., plus provisions addressing roadway standards, grading and drainage regulations to control impacts to wetlands, landscaping standards, and design review requirements) 2. Environmental management regulations 3. Design regulations and standards controlling specific projects Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment I-17 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 32 4. Administrative and permitting procedures Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment I-18 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 33 II. PLANNING CONTEXT A. LOCAL PLANNING PROGRAMS Adopted local plans and State law create the planning context for the Chula Vista Bayfront LCP. The LCP must be consistent with both the City's General Plan and the provisions of the California Coastal Act. State law (Code Section 65300) requires each city to adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the city. The State requires general plans based on the belief that the future growth of the State is determined largely through local actions. By requiring general plans, the State can be ensured of a consistent framework for decisions while still allowing local control. In a similar manner, an approved LCP provides assurance that the specific interest of the State, as expressed in the Coastal Act, will be met within the Coastal Zone while still allowing local decision- making. 1. General Plan Bayfront Vision Statement The 2010 Chula Vista General Plan includes a description of "The Vision" for the development of the City. The City considers the Bayfront an important development area due to its location and potential tp create a unique image for Chula Vista. The following statement from the General Plan describes the vision for the Bayfront: ~~;.^ r~~ , innth ~..., ^h^^~^ hr^ ,. ~:,~„ .. ~:, .',.,^ '~,,.,,,,,,-2f3(~E3gS~wvll ,i'4o I't i niJ o h i oll ~i~~ The Bavfront Master Plan envisions aworld-class Bavfront in the Citv of Chula Vista to benefit citizens and visitors to the region, and to compliment existing and proposed development within the City's corporate boundaries. A major component of the Bavfront Master Plan is the protection of natural areas and sensitive biological resources. The Bavfront Master Plan supports the implementation of a variety of uses including offce, residential, retail, entertainment, recreation, other visitor-serving uses and reconfiguration of the harbor. 2. Goals for Development The preceding vision statement can be expressed as a series of ooals for Bavfront development as listed below: • Create a water oriented focal point for the entire city Of Chula Vista which includes uses which are attractive to visitors and residents alike. • Establish linkages between the Bavfront Plannina Area and the Northwest Planning Area for pedestrians, bicycles, and transit. • Provide for the extension of the downtown urban core into the Bayfront to emphasize a strong east-west connection. • Establish_roadways in the Bavfront Plannina Area that respond to the special operating characteristics of roadways within a more urbanized environment, accommodate slower Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment II-1 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 34 speeds in pedestrian-oriented areas and facilitate multi-modal design elements and amenities. • Provide continuous open space network which links the Bayfront to the planned "Chula Vista Greenbelt" incorporating the Sweetwater River Valley to the north and the Otay River Valley to the south. • Increase mobility for residents and visitors in the Bavfront Planning Area. • Promote integrated land uses in the Bayfront and create an identifiable image for the Bayfront. • Create park and recreational opportunities in the Bavfront Planning Area that protect the natural beauty of the Bay and improve access and usage by area residents and visitors. • Provide good regionalaccess to encourage visitors to the Bayfront. • Provide for natural open space conservation in the Bavfront Planning Area. • Provide for the long-term protection of important natural resources, including those withing the National Wildlife Refuge. Encourage redevelopment and new development activities within the Sweetwater Subarea that will minimize impacts to environmentally sensitive lands adiacent to the Sweetwater Marsh National Wildlife Refuge. Promote opportunities for public coastal success, open space, park and recreational uses adjacent to the natural resources of the Bayfront. Provide for the redevelopment and new development of the Harbor Subarea that will reinforce its identity as the City's Bayfront focal point. Reta+n~2-criajer--empleq'eFaad-iadustr+al-bN~.~C:=.,::::&'^, ~~t !;m;r eh e~~~' ^r^r-any_new.genera! +ndusirial-arid-cen~te-assay.. ~'~„ ~~^;,,~;,ar~e€~+nique v+s+feFerienled--u Encourage redevelopment and new development activities within the Otav Subarea that will provide employment recreational and visitor-serving opportunities and energy utility needs The Chula Vista Bayfront contains scenic resources of local and regional importance. The scenic and visual qualities of these areas shall be protected and, where feasible, enhanced. B. CALIFORNIA COASTAL ACT This section is organized following the policy categories identified in the California Coastal Commission LCP Manual. This section provides three types of information for each category: 1-a. A summary of applicable Coastal Act policies ~ b. A discussion of existing conditions for each policy category 3,c. A summary of the LCP provisions that address the coastal issue Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment II-2 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 35 1. Shoreline Access a. Coastal Act Policies Sections 30210-30212 of the Coastal Act require that public and recreational opportunities be provided for all the people, that development not interfere with the public's right of access, and that new development provide public access to the shoreline. b. Existing Conditions There is currently limited physical, public access to Chula Vista's shoreline. The only direct public access to the bay is outside the LCP Planning Area on Port property. This includes a boat launch, marina, and park that are located off the westerly extension of "J" Street. Also on Port property is a park and public beach located immediately west of the Goodrich facility. Public access is also provided via a shuttle bus that serves the Chula Vista Nature Center, located on Gunpowder Point, and within the boundaries of the National Wildlife Refuge. The lack of adequate public access is due partly to the types of land uses that currently exist along the shoreline. ~r Goodrich's major industrial/manufacturing facility, boats yards, SDG&E {3rcaf~rtu utility infrastructure, power plant operations, the National Wildlife Refuge, and undeveloped property all have resulted in very limited direct public access opportunities. Access is also Jinuted due-to-the-e+w+rof~+aea,`m„ ~°^a;ti+vity-a#-!Jae si~re4u}e~viJJ~i+a-tAe~4aHn+ag~ra7-~ia~+Jed c-~r- resirJcied-ee~ess-is- ;e~~.,aseaae-areas-to--preserve-lhe-habitat~aJae-ot-ik~e~J3areJi~e itse!€ Due to the environmental sensitivity of the shoreline within the Bavfront area, limited or restricted access is necessary in some areas to preserve the habitat value of the shoreline itself. c. Plan Provisions Public access to the shoreline, consistent with habitat preservation, is one of the key provisions of this Land Use Plan. The Land Use Plan designates approximately 4-26 acres of public and quasi-public areas and parks and recreation ^'''^^^^' '^ '~^ s~~ ~^'' ^~' ° rh°~°h„ °~"~ ^^~~^^'^^ ~' ^ ~ ° '^ '~^ ^ ~^'~' ~ with over 30 additional acres of public areas and parks and recreation being designated within the Bavfront area on Port lands. The areas within the Port's jurisdiction provide the adjacency of public spaces to the bay and National Wildlife Refuge, thereby greatly enhancing public access to coastal resources. These areas are governed by the provisions of the Port Master Plan. All of the public, park, and open space lands will be permanently dedicated and maintained to ensure future access. v,,, ni~~,~i ~nriarv° ~°f ..° . h'nF, nffn. V,~~h .,.i.,~tr'.,., .,d L.'.. .-I,. .ah The Port Master Plan includes public accessibility in the Bavfront through a series of public shoreline parks and open space areas adjacent to the National Wildlife Refuse that offer both pedestrian and bicycle paths. Development on parcels within the LCP Planning Area will ensure continuity with such access defined in the Port Master Plan. In addition, shuttle bus operations from the Bayfront to the Chula Vista Nature Center will continue to provide public access to a unique educational and wildlife resource. o t,r.. ^.,,~ „^ „ , ,,°a „ ~ti^ ne,~r,..,,r.^„, ~^ ^ Implementation of the policies in this Land Use Plan will ensure that public access and recreational opportunities will be provided, that new development will not interfere with the public's right of access, and that new development will not conflict with Port plans to provide public access to the shoreline. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment II-3 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 36 2. Recreation and Visitor-Serving Facilities a. Coastal Act Policies Sections 30212.5 and 30213 [part, 30220-30223 and 30250(c)] of the Coastal Act requires the provision of public and low-cost recreation and visitor-serving facilities, and encourages the provision of commercial recreational and visitor-serving facilities by requiring that suitable land be reserved for such uses and that uses be given priority over other uses. b. Existing Conditions Limited visitor-serving facilities are located adjacent to I-5 along Bay Boulevard, including a small motel and four restraints. The Port District Marina and boat launch facilities contain restaurants, boat slips, and a marina. Marina View Park and the Port District's fishing pier are adjacent to the bay and provide low cost public recreational facilities. A yacht club facility and excursion pier have been constructed to provide additional recreational opportunities. Within the LCP Planning Area limited visitor-serving facilities are located adjacent to I-5 along Bav Boulevard including a small motel and two restaurants. The adjacent Port Master Plan Ptirt C. ~t~~~,t-P,Aarir,a ants b++at ~a;a~E~ fa~,l~t+e4 area includes a marina and boat launch facilities containing feartwo restaurants, boat slips, and a marina. Marina View Park and the fishing pier, also within the Port Master Plan area, are adjacent to the bay and provide low cost public recreational facilities. A yacht club facility provides additional recreational opportunities. c. Plan Provisions In-add+tionto-the~c+sting reerealion-ar~~visiter-serving#ac{liiies~he~and-Use-War~prevides a vat+ety-ef-cesreatianal~e#dnitie~,^~ Wing-a.-to sees-©f-Harks-and Recreafion~se:-lhe~ast-majouty-e#-whish~rvill--tae-parkland-open-to-tk~e public-with©ai-ses6--the Lind i~P~an-alse-previdesa-tatal-o#-appraxiraately-~g-asFe°,-~,~p~.'sind-sfuaepen spasms and water--including-an eigh~asres-lagoonwiihi+~Niel~AidJ3ayf+ont~wwhisti-wllF-have assess for-luaifed-resreat+ena#ase !n -addi3isn--the-Central-Resort- Caistrtst-of-the-Midbay#rant-is-tlesignafed-fer-+ed-use--vister sewing Bevelef~ment-kJses w+ih~he-Midlaaykaatinsludehotels:-sen#erer~ecenter.a~ulkaral-arts fiaeilily-{estaurants-,,--specialty relai~and-eommer~+al-rec~eati©n uses: As--listed-above: -the~el+c:es ei-tf~-L~2R-provide-#oF~ublis- and- low-c-0sFrecreation: --F!!ae lvlidbay#roFrl-prejest-as-intended-#c}~~ler-serving tasilities-with-Nae-Seastal-done-and inc;lodes-major~~rur+ercialreereational uses, In addition to the existing facilities provided within the Bavfront within both the LCP Planning area and the Port Master Plan area as mentioned above the Land Use Plan designates new visitor- servinq facilities within the Harbor District Future facilities within the LCP Planning area include a hotel and ancillary retail establishments such as restaurants shops and shared public plazas. Although the Land Use Plan specifically provides new facilities within the Harbor District other new facilities are provided within all districts through the Port Master Plan. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment II-4 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 37 3. Water and Marine Resources a. Coastal Act Policies Sections 30230, 30231, and 30236 of the Coastal Act require the preservation and, where feasible, the enhancement and restoration of water and marine resources including coastal water, streams, wetlands, estuaries, and lakes. Special protection shall be given to areas and species of special biological or economic significance. b. Existing Conditions The Bayfront contains marshes, mudflats, and uplands and includes one of the last remaining major wetlands in San Diego Bay. These wetland areas provide habitat and nesting sites for a wide range of avian species, which are of special concern due to diminishing habitat throughout their range. `~'~toa„"~a'~~Many of the important wetlands are located within the S+nr~~e~aaF~ars#-National Wildlife Refuge (Subarea 1). ^ ~ ^~ °~'^ +~~ Dnhr v,.. r+,. .,a ~~,,, nn a~,., ,v..,..: c ti...o,. Establishment of this refuge has assured ensured, ,the preservation of the important wetland and biologically valuable upland resources. The long-term protection and enhancement of these resources are now the essential objectives for environmental management in the Bavfront area. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment II-5 April 2012 Land Use Plan Reso]ution No. 2012-189 Page No. 38 Plan Provisions This-LEA{~r9v+deS-f9f-W~«~^.`~,d-~•~Ster2F{6a-and„^h~....°..._^« _. ,+_ ^,a^_ h^h~-„« .°.2fafeaS +f l~~ Alat+ena _ uplands ~ fill-to ~^'°'.T . oi-,...,. ,«~ s... «ho ~o~«,.. - _At'~-~" ~YCeet tvlar3la,the~andUS~P.ov.,~-.~t.~.o. enhancement-of-degraded ~~.~f,~'^^ds.~ad~or-the-ceaskastioFrof-a-~' ^~ ' ^ h~°~^ ~~'~^^^-r~' to-the marsh-€ Wildlife-Refuge: Wildlife-{flat+cis-{px«mar+~t-bi~z+r~~Ehe-lN+ldlife- sal ar~visttal-iatr+~splemer+tl ~. ~... ~ ryY...~ througk~sasek+!-siting-and-design of-bu+ldings-aseord+,. `~^ '~^~° '' . ~~«~ ^F «h^ i ~ 92ta4k:d 6F+teR3!? .• .a.~..°.^ = ~veieped-ter design ef-fia+ture strustdres~rsonsideratier~ef t le~ertherfl-and Wildlde-Refuge, the-LfladkJse Raan~rovide°~.h°'^ n«ial~arklaadlepea spase~uffeFlandward of the~Wktl+f~ °°?..-Page-Wildlife populations (primarily birds) using the National Wildlife Refuge will be protected from physical and visual intrusion by (1) implementing the arrangement of uses resulting from the land exchange depicted in the Land Use Plan, including the placement of more intensive land uses farther from environmentally sensitive areas such as the National Wildlife Refuge and the incorporation of buffer zones and other adjacency measures around sensitive habitat, and (2) through siting and design of buildings according to the design requirements of the LCP. !atlae ~Street~ilt-Area.-vvRhiFathe~/ikJl~Re#uge-Ehe€nwsanment2~Man agemeat€teaaeat pr^~^°'~...s4c3ratie«~-ef-appreximate4y-~dasres~e€-rlaL-marsk~9a-the-6unpewder~-Reint uplands.--alsexrithin-theNVildlite Refuge; the Viand-Use F~aa-prevides ~eFC~reatic3wofapproximate4y tW9-a6f2S82-fi..~h, "'«,e.~• ••,~•~~ The Environmental Management policies of the LCP provide for preservation, enhancement, and restoration of the important water and marine resources within the Bayfront area. Establishment of the National Wildlife Refuge ensures protection of the sensitive species/ habitat areas, while the policies of the LCP require mitigation of impacts to wildlife areas from development on adjacent uplands parcels. 4. Diking, Dredging, Filling, and Shoreline Structures a. Coastal Act Policies Sections 30233 and 30235 of the Coastal Act establish the limited conditions under which diking, dredging, filling of wetlands, restoration of wetlands, and construction of shoreline structures may occur. Section 30411(b) provides additional provisions for the filling of wetlands, provided it is accompanied by substantial restoration of degraded wetland. b. Existing Conditions In the past, there has been considerable alteration of the Bayfront. Filling to some degree has occurred along much of the shoreline. By far the most significant, in terms of total fill and amount of shoreline affected, is the "D" Street Fill. A railroad has also been constructed across the Sweetwater Marsh using fill material. The majority of lands potentially impacted by existing diking, dredging, or filling of wetlands are within the Port Master Plan area. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment II-6 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 39 c. Plan Provisions Except as permitted by the Coastal Commission, no significant diking, dredging, or filling of wetlands is associated with the development concept within this LCP. A° ^^«^-~ ^"^~~^, ~"^ ~ ^^~+ `~~ ,.~~„ cam.^^~ The preclusion of significant diking, dredging, or filling, beyond the limited conditions allowed by the Coastal Act, ensures consistency with these Coastal Act policies. 5. Commercial Fishing and Recreational Boating a. Coastal Act Policies Sections 30224, 30234, and 30255 of the Coastal Act encourage increased recreational boating, require the preservation of boating facilities, and give precedence to coastal-dependent development, except in wetlands. b. Existino Conditions All properties associated with commercial fishing and recreational boating are within Port jurisdiction and outside the LCP Planning Area. Boat launch and marina facilities are located on the Port property within the Bayfront. Additional recreational boating berths were constructed on the Port property, along with a yacht club facility and excursion pier to expand the initial marina facilities. c. Plan Provisions Due to the sensitive environmental resources associated with the Bayfront shoreline, access for fishing or boating is not currently permitted or proposed in the LCP Planning Area. 6+ra;4et~ put3!ic- rt~Pa=icaaa4-~aa!;,;«~+na^ ~ .~~,~:~n~~^~3~-~~t?~-A4+dba~f.^,~.t-=.,za.~~?a~~n,ittec~ In addition, boating and fishing are limited to areas within the Port's jurisdiction and will be governed by the provisions of the Port Master Plan. Because of the environmental sensitivity of the i Bayfront area, increased major recreational boating facilities within the LCP Planning Area are precluded. This general policy is consistent with the provisions of the Coastal Act. 6. Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas a. Coastal Act Policies Section 30240 of the Coastal Act provides for the protection of environmentally sensitive habitat areas by restricting uses within, or adjacent, to such areas. b. Existino Conditions In addition to the marsh and mudflat areas discussed under the Water and Marine Resources category, some upland areas have been identified as environmentally sensitive habitat areas. A minimum of 13 vegetation communities and land cover types have been identified within the Bayfront, including Diegan coastal sage scrub (disturbed), non-native grassland, eucalyptus woodland, ornamental vegetation, disturbed habitat, ruderal, southern coastal salt marsh, mule fat scrub, coastal brackish marsh, seasonal pond, disturbed riparian, bay, and urban/developed. The marsh environment within the Bayfront is critical feeding and nesting habitat for three Federal and/or State listed endangered species: California least tern, light-footed clapper rail, and Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment II-7 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 40 Belding's savannah sparrow. --~~ ~ ~~,~- - ~ _ ~ - + ~ ~^=~ ~ ~ ~~,~t ~~ °~- r~ -Other special status species that have been identified-within the Bayfront include osprey, western burrowing owl, and northern harrier. In addition, there are several other special status species that have the potential to occur within the Bayfront. Virtually all of the environmentally sensitive habitat areas are located in the National Wildlife Refuge or in the Port Master Plan area. Several potential wetland areas have been identified within the LCP Planning Area: (1) a drainage ditch, degraded due to contamination, located within the Harbor District (Parcel Area 2-g); (2) in the open space on the Faivre Street parcel (3-k); (3) the "F&G" Street Marsh (south of "F" Street); and (4) USFWS property and Parcel Area 1-g within the Sweetwater District. c. Plan Provisions In response to the need to protect these environmentally sensitive areas from the potential impact of adjacent development, the Land Use Plan provides for ex ~=r•;.-e extending setbacks and buffering land uses adjacent to the National Wildlife Refuge and other sensitive habitat areas. T~+s-ot~,~pa,..,~~ „r.,~~ ~nelude~-490-feet-Amara}-bdffer--adiaT^^sT^~Ls ,.,mss ""`''=T wtiist~wi4t- bey", :r cfer;zed-by-Rat+vc~vegetatiec~-2-berR~ead-a-rata,' zs2i1-avtF# iRterpretatwe-s+gnage-The National Wildlife Refuge open soace areas shall include a 400-foot- wide buffer adioining the refuge boundary with the 200 feet buffer area closest to the refuge as a no-touch zone characterized by native vegetation. Public access to the National Wildlife Refuge is limited to a shuttle bus that serves the Chula Vista Nature Center. Humans and domestic pets are prohibited direct access to the National Wildlife Refuge through the use of fences and perimeter signage. 1R additier~MidbayfreRt-developments w+µ~emes~spFOhitxl~egs aRd sorts. Special setbacks are required adjacent to the "F&G" Street Marsh. The design and use of both the "F&G" Street Marsh setback and the park/open space area adjacent to the National Wildlife Refuge are consistent with Army Corps Permit No. 88-267-RH. As summarized above, the LCP policies protect environmentally sensitive habitat areas by restricting uses within, or adjacent, to such areas. 7. Agriculture a. Coastal Act Policies Sections 30241 and 30242 of the Coastal Act provide for the preservation of prime agricultural land in order to ensure the protection of an area's agricultural economy. The policies establish criteria for the conversion of lands to non-agricultural uses. The criteria minimize conflicts between agricultural and urban land uses. b. Existing Conditions A major portion of the Bayfront was once used for agriculture production. However, agricultural operations were discontinued years ago and none of the area is considered prime agricultural land. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment II-8 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 41 c. Plan Provisions The Land Use Plan does not provide for the preservation of the agricultural land within the Bayfront because it is not considered high-quality agricultural land. In addition, agricultural activities would not be compatible with the type and scale of development proposed, nor with the enhancement of wetland resources and habitat areas. The absence of prime agricultural lands precludes any conflict between the designation of lands for development and the agricultural preservation provisions of the Coastal Act. 8. Hazard Areas a. Coastal Act Policies Section 30253(1)(2) of the Coastal Act requires new development to minimize risks in areas of high geologic, flood, and fire hazard and to prevent structural damage to bluffs and cliffs. b. Existing Conditions There are three potential sources of hazards within the Bayfront. They are land settlement hazards, seismic hazards, and flood hazards. The settlement hazards are attributable to the presence of relatively shallow surficial deposits of soft compressible bay mud throughout the historic marsh lands and tidal flats, as well as in deeper water areas. Two major faults have been mapped near the Chula Vista waterfront area: the north-northwest-trending Rose Canyon /San Diego Bay/ Tijuana fault, and the east-west Otay fault. Parts of the Bayfront area were within the standard project flood area of the Army Corps Sweetwater River Flood Control Project. However, at the completion of the flood control project, these flood hazards were eliminated. c. Plan Provisions To address flooding, settlement, and seismic hazards, the Bayfront Land Use Plan contains provisions to require engineering investigations to minimize potential hazards to development. Buildings will be designed and constructed to meet earthquake safety requirements as required by the Uniform Building Code. Soil conditions will be monitored and evaluated for geologic conditions related to possible liquefactions. The LCP Utilities and Area Wide Grading (Section III.D) policies will minimize risks from the known geologic and flood hazards associated with the LCP Planning Area. 9. Forestry and Soil Resources This category of Coastal Act policies is not applicable to the Bayfront area. 10. Locating and Planning New Development a. Coastal Act Policies Sections 30244, 30250 (a), and 30253 (3)(4) of the Coastal Act provide criteria for the location of new development. Generally, new development should be concentrated in areas of existing Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment II-9 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 42 development with adequate public services. New development should provide adequate support facilities, including provisions for recreation facilities and for public transit, and should preserve archaeological or paleontological resources. b. Existing Conditions ~#e-L;#f~#a-alista-Bayffor~t+sessential4y-develot,~d~ ^^,~~°-i..~~~ ef-~.;=., cf.^no„ [3fFVQ-]-and36attP.ief~$fRat{2r~3ar6Pl• Sr-,~vrge~&^oa~^rt pvrccYr.vrv ~~" ~}F~6~eRt~~e-~t#e-$QFlt#~-a:~rc-c^~f~ ~+fc1'rznc ~In..... ..^.I MI'Lll fn Dnf n 4.. 4L.n n.i L. /iV..~ #eau~l y iadasts+a4izes#-N .~ .. _ .. _ _ , The Chula Vista Bavfront is characterized by a land use mix that balances coastal development and protected coastal open space The area north of "F" Street and scattered smaller parcels are currently undeveloped parcels The large vacant parcel north of "F" Street is adjacent to urban development to the south and east with the National Wildlife Refuge to the north (the heavily industrialized National Citv waterfront is immediately farther to the north) and San Diego Bay to the west This parcel north of "F" Street is within Port jurisdiction following the land exchange and is covered by the provisions of the Port Master Plan One previously recorded archaeological site (CA-SDI-5512) and one historical site the Coronado Belt Line Railroad line (CA-SDI-13.073H), is present within the LCP Planning Area. c. Plan Provisions The Land Use Plan provides specific locations for a wide range of uses including commercial recreation, residential, visitor-serving commercial, manufacturing, retail, office, public facilities, parks and open space. An overall grading concept and performance standards to ensure the provision of adequate public services are established in the policies of this Land Use Plan. Interconnection of existing and proposed public transit will integrate Bayfront circulation patterns into the San Diego Trolley, the Chula Vista Transit System, and the regional bicycle/pedestrian circulation system (see Exhibits 9a 9b and 9c in Section III.B). The Land Use Plan policies take into consideration the unique relationship between new development and sensitive environmental areas (biological, archaeological, and paleontological)adjaser~t-tEri#e-tvtidbayffeat• The Land Use Plan integrates the Chula Vista Nature Center with the Bayfront via the shuttle and through the provision of public parking i~ ~~ P~~ ;~~ ~-r within the t+~F<?,>~tl+E,r,:. gayfront. New development is concentrated in an area of existing development. T#e-faew-develepr~ient envisieaed are t#iskSR-iraelodes-as a pa+# e€ t#e-seaseptual dev..'^~mn,T,~' ~Iaa-eFwil4be ~wa+red t©-provide-s~tpport~asil+Nes~neludi+~g{eefeatien-fas+++fies~rans+t. Adequate facilities will be included within the Bayfront to provide expanded services including recreation and fire station facilities and public transit. Development within the LUP Planning Area is in balance with proposals contained in the Port Master Plan. Overall, these uses are complimentary, meet the needs of users and visitors, and are supportive of the maintenance of open space. This is accomplished through balancing traffc patterns, providing transit and walking paths, and providing an array of financially and fiscally sustainable uses which generate the revenues necessary for the maintenance of public access, facilities, and open space. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment II-10 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 43 11. Coastal Visual Resources and Special Communities a. Coastal Act Polices Sections 30251 and 30253 (5) of the Coastal Act require the protection of scenic and visual qualities of coastal areas, and the preservation of unique visitor destination communities. b. Existing Conditions The potential visual and scenic qualities of the Bayfront are currently not being fully realized. The views of the area from adjacent I-5 are impaired by the lower elevation of I-5, and in some locations are marred by visual blight, including abandoned buildings, open storage, vegetation overgrowth, non-landscaped transmission line corridors, and aboveground transmission lines. c. Plan Provisions The Land Use Plan provides for the removal of existing blight from the Bayfront LCP Planning Area .,,r f^. "r^ ~ r^ ,~~^,. ."^ "~,. ,^ .",. , E.,.....",. ^,°'°~ ^` '"° °^•'Prn^' ^~ '•••^~'' The removal of this blight will allow the public to experience views from the Bayfront outward toward the coast. The removal of this blight will also enhance the views of the coastline from the east. In addition, the Land Use Plan requires that view corridors from the freeway and roadways be preserved, framed, or uncluttered, pursuant to the provisions outlined in Section III (C1 of this plan, to ensure an attractive view of, and to establish a visual relationship with, the marshes and bay-related activities. A Fire Station is planned to be developed within the Bayfront to provide added public services to the Bayfront area. Entrances to the Bayfront have been designed to form visual gateways to the water's edge to support the sense of the City's proximity to the bay. Landscaping and architectural edges are used to form sequences of views throughout the Bayfront. New buildings have will be sited to create view corridors. Buildings are to be stepped back from the bay to preserve views as set forth in the Land Use Plan. The policies of this LCP will enhance the existing scenic and visual qualities of the local coastal zone and accommodate development of a unique coastal community. 12. Public Works a. Coastal Act Policies Section 30254 of the Coastal Act limits the construction or expansion of public works facilities to the capacity required to provide service to only those users permitted by the Coastal Act. b. Existino Conditions Adequate water, sewage, and other utility services are currently present to serve existing uses; " . ., ~~ .,^°,± t^ ^.,t^..,± ^..tc ttio nn .a"~ ,:.^.,. a ~ t t v however they will need to be ., _.. ~.. .,.. ..,, ..,,. .._ .,r.,,", .,, extended to serve specific development sites. c. Plan Provisions The Land Use Plan requires adequately sized utility lines to serve development of the Bayfront within the capacity of the utility services. These lines will be extended and upgraded where necessary to serve future development as planned in this LCP. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment II-11 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 44 13. Industrial Development and Energy Facilities a. Coastal Act Policies Sections 30255, 30260-30264, 30232, and 30250 (b) of the Coastal Act provide guidelines for the development of new or the expansion of existing coastal dependent industrial facilities, tanker facilities, liquefied natural gas terminals, oil and gas development, refineries, and electrical generating plants. b. Existing Conditions Rehr-oaf=fac+li{ie~aaEf-#he~G~€ ~~n^•^r ;y f~lant-aad-#an~' ,~T..,^~^~^""°, c~nty-twe ma}er-iadr+s{ria{and-energy-taeili' ^~~~°^"y-wee Sayfreai---Goodrich facilities and transmitter lines represent the only major industrial facilities currently within the LCP Planning Area. The South Bay Power Plant is located outside of the LCP Planning Area. c. Plan Provisions The Land Use Plan allows for the expansion of existing industrial facilities but does not allow additional r~:,r~-.~~ast:+l--<1r ~~~~14~nt industrial development to occur beyond the areas shown as industrial use on the Land-'~-ate ~i~a Zoning Map (see Exhibit 8 in Section IILA). Expansion of the existing Roh~Goodrich facility is permitted, including industrial and office uses, I'.~8 research and development, and light manufacturing}n the~Widk~ay#roet-within their existing property boundaries. These provisions are consistent with the Coastal Act requirements. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment II-12 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 45 AREAWIDE DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES This chapter is organized into five separate sections: Land Use; Circulation; Public Access, and Parking; Physical Form and Appearance, Utilities and Areawide Grading, and Environmental Management. Each of these sections includes a brief description of existing conditions and then provides basic objectives for development in the Chula Vista Bayfront area. The objective for each section is italicized for quick identification. Associated specific policy provisions are defined to guide development and resource enhancement in the LCP Planning Area for each topical area of concern. These policies, which are key to the consistency between this Land Use Plan and the Ceastal Act, are numbered aa~+~itf#icE$ by asa+~s-sefft-#yae#acr ,[~fl+cy ~y~e#ae~) to aid in making reference to and application of the policies. In some cases, the areawide plan provisions are supplemented with policy diagrams and exhibits keyed to the text to clarify the intent of the specific provisions. A. LAND USE ^"'^ ^°vn l1DMCl\IT 1"ITZC"1 C~~. __rTV The Bay#ent LCP Planning Area (local coastal zone) totals approximately a 813 722 acreset~a#ici~ ..I,....J~ ... f'll`VI .. -. L.n .. h' h !'.VIA ,,..ll '~CG .. ..:!.^.. '~. s-~.. '^^^ ~ ^,°~ ..,, •^ .,. ;=eu~Five major ownerships dominate the LCP Planning Area: ~1 ~~ ~+ega~as~not~tr+s~,rra{,,a~v~~~GB€dat ?~ seaf"~,-~--~,,~ nah-#?~-asfes (1) &alaf~f>c, Goodrich in the ser~rat-area Harbor District (Subarea 1) with 90 92 acres {aee-a+~-a~#iiiorla#-€,6 asses of ~aN-[~}o-k1a+#~-~or4-0i,~l+ist-o~a+~ed-la~€.E F~AUV~nd~A€=R~T~B-R~~w~#+s+~-are-leasaci-t;y-Rol,rl:-(2) the USFWS, which awns 316 acres in two parcels (Sweetwater Marsh and the "F&G" Street Marsh), which comprise the National Wildlife Refuge fsems-#+c#+s-aaiside-~#e-F,it~+ t~}-~N~;ta -Vista-4r>uesFer~-w#iekrowrts--416-asces~-1#e eer~#fa:-~R;exr-e#-t#e-E3ay#rrf~t.---(3) a private entity, which controls approximately 97 acres in the Sweetwater District that will be exchanged for approximately 30 acres of Port lands in the Harbor and Otav Districts; (4) ~h '^ "°'^ °^''^~ ^'^^^~°^f ^^^^^ .city of Chula Vista which owns approximately 16 acres, also in the Sweetwater District of the Bayfront; and SDG&E. which purchased approximately 12 acres of land from the Port District. 1 °°•°•:^^' °^^"'°^°'^^' ^^.,^'^^^.^^•'^«^^^;•,. Existing Conditions T4.., ... :h .,f fh^ nL.nfi o .'th'.. fh.. nl^nn'^ ..fi rl I ......~.,...~ ...., .., ..r,.., ,.. ... ~...., ........, .,.~. r,.., ,, y ....,.. ,,, .,.,......,y ...,...~., .~,.~,......~.... ^.~ ~.,, .,.~.., ^^y.^y ~ ~ .... aSSErHbt~y-R6h.~° ., .., f'„ ~f~...~.+1° rh^ rh L. ~r~t,. I ro „ .,a fh., .. FE3r~-B+s#fVSt-Ic'~ndS- Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-1 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolutian No. 2012-189 Page No. 46 A total of 2g ownerships and leaseholds have been identified in the Bavfront area. including Federal, State and local government entities local agencies and private owners. The parcels within the Port Master Plan area are under the jurisdiction of the Port. Parcels within the Bavfront area, but outside of the Port Master Plan area are within the jurisdiction of the Citv and are included within the LCP Planning Area The maiority of developed use areas accessible by the public are located within the Harbor District The Otav District is characterized by industrial uses and primarily closed to the public. The Sweetwater District is generally undeveloped The maiority of the upland areas within the LCP Planning Area are currently developed with urban uses The major land user is Goodrich with manufacturing activities ranging from research and development to assembly Goodrich's operations straddle the Chula Vista LCP Planning Area and the adjacent Port lands Other existing land uses within the LCP Planning Area include commercial retail industrial warehousing natural open space preserve active parks and passive parks visitor-related uses bikeways transit corridors and roads. SDG&E transmission lines and 40-foot Coronado Railroad track easements extend the entire length of the Bavfront area on its eastern edge. The LCP Planning Area includes 29 parcel areas Descriptions of Parcel Areas 1-a through 3-I within the City's jurisdiction are summarized below The descriptions are based on parcel areas that define land use areas and include a summary of existing conditions and Bavfront Specific Plan zoning There are three general categories for parcel areas within the LCP Planning Area: Developed Parcels Undeveloped Parcels and Land Exchange Parcels. These categories and associated parcel areas are summarized below The parcel areas are numbered based on district (Sweetwater Harbor and Otay) and a sequential lettering system and are shown in Exhibit 7 Zoning per the LCP is shown in Exhibit 8. Chula Vista Bavfront LCP Amendment III-2 Land Use Plan April 2012 Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 47 Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment 1113 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 48 Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-4 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 49 Developed Parcel Areas: The majority of parcel areas are currently developed. There is potential for these parcel areas to be redeveloped within the limits of the existing zoning and provisions of the LCP; however, the existing uses of these parcel areas are expected to remain the same. • Parcel Areas 1-b through 1-e are currently developed with commercial land uses including Anthony's Fish Grotto, Good Nite Inn, EI Torito, and the Highland Partnership office building, from north to south, respectively. These parcels are zoned Commercial-Thoroughfare (C-T). • Parcel Area 1-f is a small City park. The park is accessed from "F" Street and consists of grassy landscaped areas, benches/seating areas, and parking areas. This parcel is zoned Parks and Recreation (P-R). • Parcel Area 1-g is existing open space characterized by wetlands and native habitat. There are four parcels within this area. Three of the parcels are owned by the City and one is owned by Goodrich. This area is zoned as Open Space (O-S). • Parcel Area 1-h is characterized as developed with industrial uses with a portion of the parcel as open spaces uses. This parcel is privately owned. This area is zoned for Industrial- General (I-G). • Parcel Area 1-i is characterized as developed with commercial uses with a portion of the parcel as open spaces uses. This parcel is privately owned. This area is zoned for Commercial -Thoroughfare (C-T). • Parcel Area 2-a is existing open space characterized by wetlands and native habitat. There are two parcels within this area, both of which are owned by the USFWS and encompass the "F&G" Street Marsh. This area is zoned as O-S. • Parcel Area 2-b is owned by Goodrich. The area consists of existing industrial and commercial land uses, including warehouses, office, and parking structures. The Goodrich facility has been involved in aircraft manufacturing since the early 1940s. Parcel Area 2-b became known as the Goodrich North Campus Facility following sale of the South Campus (south of "H" Street) to the Port in the late 1990s. The North Campus facility is generally bounded by Bay Boulevard to the east, Marina Parkway to the west, the Sweetwater Marsh National Wildlife Refuge to the northwest, "F" Street and the National _ north, and "H" Street to the south. The _ _ within the City's jurisdiction - Campus includes-three zon -~~ _ G), and Commercial-Professio - T_ =~'~~` -, • Parcel Area 2-c is commercial land use and consists of a Pacific Trust Ban~nd asso'aated parking areas. This parcel is zoned as I-G. • Parcel Area 2-d is a small retail complex, Gateway Business Park, which includes the West Marine shop, Kelly Paper, and Fleet Pride. The retail area includes parking areas and access from Bay Boulevard. This parcel is zoned as I-G. • Parcel Area 2-e is a commercial office land use that includes a National University campus. This parcel is zoned as I-G. • Parcel Area 3-b contains the Community Health Group building and associated surface parking areas located at 740 Bay Boulevard. This area is zoned as I-G. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-5 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 50 Parcel Area 3-c contains the PIMA Medical Group building and associated surface parking areas. This area is zoned as I-G. Parcel Area 3-d contains the LAING office building and associated surface parking areas. This area is zoned as I-G. • Parcel Area 3-e contains the Furniture Warehouse on the east side of Bay Boulevard and associated parking and loading areas. This area is zoned as I-G. • Parcel Areas 3-f, 3-g, and 3-h are currently commercial/retail and light industrial uses with various businesses such as pest control, antique sales, clothing sales, produce sales, and offices. The business complex is characterized by multiple single-story buildings, storefronts, loading docks, and parking areas. These areas are zoned as I-G. Parcel Area 3-i consists of the Bayside Business Park with several different leasers. This area is zoned as I-G. • Parcel Area 3-j includes the Grainger building. This area is zoned as I-RL. • Parcel Area 3-k consists of the Faivre Street industrial area. This area includes industrial land uses in addition to some undeveloped areas within the floodplain of the Otay River. This area was annexed from the County of San Diego and contained the County's zoning of Manufacturing with a floodplain overlay (M-54). In the late 1990s, the M-54 zoning designation was changed to the City's Industrial-Limited (I-L) zone and the floodplain overlay in the City's General Plan was changed to O-S. Undeveloped Parcel Areas: A few parcel areas, which are currently undeveloped, are also within the LCP Planning Area and have the potential for development within the limits of the designated zoning and provisions of the LCP. Parcel Area 1-a is owned by the City. The land is currently vacant and is zoned as C-P. The parcel is located just north of "E" Street and west of a freeway off-ramp. A portion of the property is under the jurisdiction of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and is not included in the LCP Planning Area. The portion of the property located outside the Caltrans area is approximately 5 acres and is planned for office development in the CVBMP. This parcel has restricted access. Parcel Area 2-g is-owned by the City of Chula Vista. This site has an area of 1.81 acres; it is currently vacant and is designated as Public/Quasi-Public (P-O). This site is planned for construction of Chula Vista Fire Station Number 11. Parcel Area 3-a includes a surface parking lot adjacent to "J" Street and undeveloped lands located between Bay Boulevard and I-5 south of "J" Street. These parcels have the potential for additional development based on existing zoning. The surface parking lot parcel is currently zoned as C-V. The remaining parcels in Parcel Area 3-a are zoned I-G. Parcel Area 3-I includes approximately 18 acres of land previously disturbed and currently vacant. It is currently under the ownership of SDG&E and the Port District and it could potentially be used for the relocation of the electrical substation. Parcel Area 3-I is zoned I-G. Land Exchange Parcel Areas: Four parcel areas have been transferred to a private entity as a part of the land exchange with the Port. These parcel areas are located in the Harbor District and have a specific proposal for development per the CVBMP. Please see Exhibit 8a for the permitted height and massing of the proposed private development. Also please refer to Table 3-2 for permitted Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-6 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 51 _... - HD-AR. __._ 45' 25' 110 _ 45' J 1 45 _-i 45' ~ ' ' ~ 25' 60' !I 70' 35' r-i ~I ^ 35 I 70, ~ ~ 45' U U _ 60' !' 190' i ,' '~ ~I _ ~. ~ ' 4i _ _ j 90~ 35' 140' 0' ~ 20 9 ~.. }iE,.yB~. - _._ ~ 25"~ __ ~_\``_ 30' ~\ ~ -=~ rte i`I 50' - I 3 ~ 106' 92' 0 30' 30' Parcel 2-f 1 I ~ Parcel2-h 1 W s-~ r E Land Exchange Development-Cross Section 1 C~Wa Vlala Bavlmm Loral Coaslel Plan Exhibit 8a Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-7 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 52 Nt; ,;,~ 45' J 25 110 ~ ,'. i 70 --"_-l 30' 60~ 30' 45~ ~__ 45• _ -- 45' -~ ~~, 801 ~ 70' 35' 35' -~) I _.._ ~' ,. 45 - - 60 90 it - !__-: - -, - --~ f I I Pa ~_ ~ 90' 35' 140'' 90' 45~ ,' 35. 200 ~ i ~ ~- ~~~-..._-..- 7Z'Sr...__.._ I I BO r~D °.~ .. ----,' ,n rL: I _ ..-.-. .. ~ J - 1'~ -t> tos~ ~ s2' ~ i 30' i 30 _._, _.__...~ _ _1.._.... ~I P. ~~ rcel 2-f Ircel 2-h W S~N E Land Exchange Development-Cross Section 2 C1NP VIOIp BRy110111 LOCI COPplpl PIpY CILIR Vplp. CIp1101111R Exhlblt Bb Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-8 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 53 development intensity, as well as the Subarea 2 Harbor District section for special conditions including height limitations. • Parcel Area 2-f is currently undeveloped land and includes CVBMP Parcels H-13 and H-14. This parcel area is zoned as Residential-Mixed Harbor District (R-MH). Parcel Area 2-h consists of industria South Campus and includes CVBM categories: the southern portion. is portion is zoned C-P. I properties that were previously part of the Goodrich P Parcel H-15. This parcel area includes two zoning zoned as Commercial-Visitor (C-V) and the northern 2. Land Use Regulation Objectives/Polices Objective LU.1 New Bayfront development should encourage amixed-use development combining visitor serving commercial/recreational uses, public parks, and residential. The mixed use character of the Bayfront will: 1) minimize the traffic impact of development on the surrounding roadway system by splitting fhe peak hour traffic between trip origins and destinations; and 2) significantly expand public access and use of the Bayfront. Objective LU.2 Integrate new development with the existing National Wildlife Refugre in a manner which permits public enjoyment/access to the resources while protecting sensitive habitat areas from intrusion or adverse impacts due to development and/or human activities. Policy LU.2-R Public parks and open space are designated on the Land Use Plan Map, Exhibit 38- N^^~."'-~, -to buffer the wetlands from development and to provide visual access to the coastal resources. ° ~' ^ ..~~~..,., tc t~, ^!c„.,~ !,.,~,,,,,,,,,,,.~_ Cam„ ,~~' . Public trails with interpretive signage shall be provided within the buffer adjacent to the Wildlife Refuge to allow public enjoyment of the refuge without distributing its inhabitants. ~eAsy-Objective LU.3-.4 General undustrial uses are permitted and may expand in the areas designated for Industrial use on the Land Use Plan Map, Exhibit 38 -page-~Il~. these areas correspond to those areas which are already commited to industrial uses. New industrial development in other areas shall not be permitted. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-9 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 54 Objective LU.4 Preserve and enhance the existing saltwater marshes, ponds, and mudflats to protect the many natural resouce values of the habitat and contribute to the visual quality of the Bayfront. Policy LU.4.A Most sensitive habitat areas have been placed within the Sweetwater Marsh National Wildlife Refuge, though other sensitive areas exist in the LCP area adjacent to the Sweetwater and Otay River. The land use area designations and locations indicated on the Land Use Plan Map have been selected to allow for development while buffering sensitive environmental areas. In addition, the Environmental Management section of this plan sets forth numerous polices which shall ensure the preservation and enhancement of these resources and areas discovered during plan implementation. Policy LU.4.B Permitted uses in the wetlands, wetland buffers and upland areas of the National Wildlife refuge shall be under the primary jurisdiction of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service which owns and operates the refuge. The California Coastal Commission will participate in the review of improvements in these areas through "consistency' process for Federal activities. Objective LU.5 Provide ample opportunities for public open space and adjacent to the natural resources of the Bayfront to increase public access to the waterfront. Rc~lisykU:6„~-R~+b1iE parks~i-epe+~ 3pase-to ir~periraeter e#~e-Midbaytsenf development area-.- will~atair}-pedesfcian~rtdbisysle trails.--epperiunit#~~rs '~^^°~si ..,__^ ©ryperiaaii+es~vi^~'~,. ^~..~^ ih.~-~' ^^ ^' ,.. _tta+ads,-anrl '.,~. °~„~ ~s ar2#a-ia~he-€~wireamenial ^"^,,,~^„^..^°~,,z~s< 4 ~ t~. , a, ii r a ^ .,~ ~~, wild~#e-habitat: Objective LU.6 Permit a balanced and well defined mix of land uses which will be responsive to the development and conservation goals of the Bayfront LCP. Policy LU.6.A The Land Use Plan Map, Exhibit 38,~age-Jlt-3 indicates the location of the various permitted uses. The permitted use categories include: general industrial, research and limited industrial, Harbor District mixed residential (including combinations of high-rise residential and mid-rise residential), visitor commercial, thoroughfare commercial, professional and administrative commercial, public; and quasi-public uses; parks and recreation; and open space.higkf dens+ty-resiEleai+a# -fiear-iyPes~# eommersia! ~ubks-aad-quasi-pub4is uses-..ik~e-seatcal-fesert-distr+s~-and~a~i+fe re#age. A more detailed mapping of public open space is provided in the Environmental Management Map, Exhibit 912, in Section IILEpage Table 3-1 pageaU-~- summarizes the land use distribution within the Bayfront. Policy LU.6.6 The description of the permitted uses is as follows: ~ Reside+~i+a4 -}~es}dea#iai-t~°~e limUed- sr^.~,~` „^'W~3 - - , sir~~res farihef -inland--Tk~is-FSn#iguraiien-will-af{erd--max+r~-a+ews-anc~-vertically-~ntegfaie~iae proposed-aew--tESes iaie-ilaei~+~atura#~eii+ng:--Allesaiier3=ap}~rexiaaaiel"~'R~asres-(~-pereeai~f develepmerit~ra,-r~at~r~siadi+~9 n~lai+er~h Senaraescial, _A flar+aber-taf-spesi#i~ eemmersia! Wises-ar~{~niitie~in the Bay-tfoni,--TQtal>aFic~n a{~{3roxiruaiely -35--asre~ net- iaetudir~g-~;e&-loeaied- i+~- Nae-men#al-~Zeswk-0istcict-~4 perseni -oi development area-net+rwladia9 rr~ajer FirsutaFier~) Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-10 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 55 +~ ~~ laaaf+#asia sat sitsalatlea~ pi ioi iron°C'?~' ~°co ~c~+etisn, i ^y uy. the_{3re.,~, ~'~.,. it .aefita S°°.., i.. ~",,, !~..,.~ ~.,.,~.^t Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-11 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 56 fru parkin`}-©a-tk+e~-0W~-beEweea-it+e-pr'Fyest-propeaeats-and-~86~€ .,.:•^~' n^;~d parking..irrthw~4E~€-RAW--cwr2J~-0t-Lagoea~rive_sha~~ h '~ h~ T.~, '' "^'' ^„°^^^` o,,. apprex Parks-~ Re`>Feati©n--Thisdesignati©n~e#ecs-taaU-Physically-a~dlery $ iatended-ins-tr~raf~bliE-evµnersh+f}---I~hts-13Flt1- ~tse~estgnat+en-ine-{ ~' +,,, o:..,^.,, ^ #f2.• ~~.^.° adjar~' taibe-w ~ ~~' •J~~erV~--~Ve~and-eF~9$~512 rH D. . 4 .d 4h L. H cli .1., f., GfdRiF9u2dpNbl~--'fir . envi raamer~takrx+a+aageme+~i--patieie~©# -~estier>-ll-€-~ierein~--ar4c~-min©r-ssier+titis~er ~dasatiera•-aces ae-nekto-beF;onstu+F.ted~hreagheut t#ie-~ayfron:-These-are vrFes and~aiti~~+elinked--~ ' aka {+ubtisly-©wned-Gii4faraF A+#s €aeil+fy-isar,.ttec~-wifNia-th ~r~ma~}y_~oms{q_per a,-aet~ae}ndtn~latien} CJpen~~ase/>PN#U+te-Ref+,~. ~,,erlay--~kris- VVildlife~e#uge-w rr, ~~ c c h .+ ~nr'i.ri r c i i ii a limited-#a-wiJdli#e habiiakpr~:a areas with signi#isant-habitat-vvalue which are-neEapart-~~#he-€ederaJ owner~+if~ar+' shewa as 9pea ~pase without-an averta~~°sigr~atiaa--~addiFien-isihe-areas designated-by~#isevaday~stiemN I- ;m^a,^,oya^n.er , -~ ~ Po pregra^7,° `^r .aspand+ng--te _ €nwranmenta~ ,#- modes- es+fi~ ~',.~,aT° ~~--- envirenmeatal--reser~rces-wit c'•-~' ~ ~breas-a, ~' 'h^ ~ ~^ c',~a' ...-.'°''. rf,. °~^~~hali h,,-~,~!'° .~spen:>•bi!+i-Y J3etermi++ai+oA andadmu+istratiea-ef~ermiF4ed-~sese-W+}d, ot--4he~+sh and~/Vi#dl+fe-Serv+ee- Re„^.,~:~~etaJ-0pea-Spa~ior~ approximately 1'~J 1-acres{;?~ percent-©f-develt3pment araa. ~+arir~4ed+ng-rs+ajer~iraalatien} ~ir~lanonl9ik+er---ibis sategoF~~nsk+des- a~,reac~he -maja~-pebl;~'• z~aYs (iru;i++ding~-rrrand~aiJroad-right-wraysw+thrr+ N~Ia~~Jr+g-area-- Table-3-1 {i3age-Jll-~-ideati#iesa separate eateger~- f©r-tbe~-5 acreage-(apprc~imatety-1~~i3-acres},- whick~~s_.r+ei-withir+ any-o€..the subareas- This aexeage~s-not part-o#-th~deveiepn~ent--area -uvithin-the--coastal gene-_AlJocation: appr©ximately ;?~asres~+oE-inskidir~g~a}or c~irs+alation-f 3-persenf~ef~evelopmea6area-not-,lading n+a}oFSUe~+latiar>-1 SPE~lAI_-Pl-AtuAR€A---This designation~ncltidesthe-Genkaf ~esori-~islr+at-whiek+~revidesan~rea within the-Midbaytro++t~ar- a _mixiFrre~tv.,eT;r',~..oed- to-serve ioer{cis-tra+relers:~-and~eear residents: ~,eciaJ-t+se-and-developme+~i-regulations-shall-be-preuided to ene~xrrage-+nnovative-designs-ar+d sa+at~i++atiansef~+ses~~;reatea-/uality ~^°^•r^•^ +^~~he~vlidbayfra#-4r+-~rdert©evalt+ate-!he proposed- <1e~~1-ir+ Ehis a{aa--,^,r;e~ '~aay-develor,. ^.,~ a-^b",aster-Paan-shall-be-preParechaad approved ta-allocate-{+sec-andciessr'ibe~iJiebuildingsand-spatial~e4a#ionships-witlain~t+e-~buiJd+ngs,-anti parking-alkaea#ior+-the--preparatiar}et a ivtaster-A{an~or the ~eakal Resort-BisKisi-fsa-reQuirement-in adc4ition-k~~.omp}ianse-with other cleveleprr+eat-regu}at+©rrs~nd-policies-of 4tais-Viand-Ise R~r- The purpose oiiho Master~~an is towns+rre-that-4he intent-and et~nsept ©f a ~isitorserving£~raJ-Resort in in~3lemenled ir} a manner-eansistent wvth iF}is 6GP- ~svaeli-as:-ether pollees-and standards4# lJ~~ity. A-cc3neeptual-illustra4ion a#lk+e-vision-for-the-Sentra# Resort Cliskist +s def~+sted in-Exhibit ~ pac,}e. J l}_. 1{~raphieally portrays one-0# fr+ar~-desig+~so}utior~=llaat -weuldkre consistent-with the~urpose-and intent-o#-lk+island~+sec~tegery.. -This~onceptual~JJE+sEration-is-providedher2in-asa++-e*ample-ofinteni, but-not- ta~ndisale a-spesitu=Josatierx: rummer--~i~e~e~n#guraiion~-brtiJdings -p~ar~+ng-a~Ht#er devnleped-s+tef eai+~res There -is~n-oaeraJ}-Jimitatio+~af isJ68 089 sq -#t- n~a~imuN} building. area-perr+~itted ir+~he Genkal r~+rl ©isirr+ tlNitk~~{k+JS-s~are~~,~e- therearafraax imams o€138A-resin!-dweUir~-u+Nts a+ui Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-12 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 57 RESIDENTIAL. Residential uses are allowed within the LCP Planning Area. Total allocation: approximately 23 acres. Residential -Mixed Harbor District (R-MHI. This land use zone refers to residential areas in the Harbor District with a mix of residential units including high-rise and mid-rise development (as defined below) within combined or separate building structures. Residential uses include multiple-family dwellings in clusters of varying size and configuration to provide a range of housing types. Retail uses will be included at the street level to create a village atmosphere and pedestrian-friendly area. shwa wsta Bayfront LGP Amendment III-13 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 58 TABLE 3-1 SUMMARY OF PERMITTED LAND USES BY SUBAREA (Approximate area - In acres} LEND vse TOTAL l d 3 5 ~ fi 2 Aaaideatlal, hig Commercial 1D E L~ T E D - V1a1toY 11 it - Thoroughfare `~12 8 4 - ProYaasional 4 AdmlaiaCretly! 2 • 12 Tadustrlnl - Research A Limited 8 ~ 10 6 63 - Denerel 289 155 96 - 6 Public s opaa fipace - Public s Quaai-PUbl3c 16 -Parka & Reoreation 37 3d - waeer e e - Dpen fipace 301 26e - CSYCU1aClon/DCher 2? 8 2 fipacial Plna Arac '- CeaCr'el RCfiart DSetrict a a0 Ma jar Circwlation TOT7.L6 1013 161 216 101 36 63 170 • A3lewted wiehln cent eetc aSaerio< v a permiteed a.a - 11mSL~ Aesngu era ted to tba naarut • • bead an ylakA~etar reading. and wailabla in[ermatSen. Mina mament• CaaC nay ra.ulC lzmn Che dawlapmene petmiC am6 rubdiviaien p eha11 mt raluir amGneM to khSe Gcp prevSMd ebat eh. aharael.r et d.wlmpn.nt and appmCwta prepertlen a!! 1 au St auintalnad. Table 3-1 Land Use Distribution Zone Acreage Commercial Visitor (C-V) 6 Thoroughfare (C-T) 42 Professional and Administrative (C-P) 26 Commercial Subtotal 74 Industrial General (I-G) 112 Research and Limited (1-RL) 14 _Limited (1-L) _ 8 Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-14 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 59 Industrial Subtotal 134 Residential Mixed Harbor District (R-MH) 23 Residential Subtotal 23 Public and Open Space Public and Quasi-Public (P-O) 28 Parks and Recreation (P-R) 1 Open Space (O-S) 310 Public and Open Space Subtotal 339 Mid-rise development is defined as 4- to 7-story buildings with condominium style residences and central garage structures. • High-rise development is defined as 8-story and above buildings with condominium style residences and central garage structures. Allocation: approximately 23 acres. COMMERCIAL. A number of specific commercial uses are permitted in the LCP Planning Area. Total allocation: approximately 74 acres. Commercial -Visitor (C-V). This land use zone provides uses for the needs of tourists, travelers, and local residents. This use is primarily located in proximity to the freeway. The regulations of this zone are designed to encourage the provision of transient housing facilities, restaurants, service stations, and other activities providing for the convenience, welfare, or entertainment of the traveler. Permitted uses include: Hotels and inns Retail, including: • Restaurants with a cocktail lounge as an integral part; • Art galleries; • Retail shops; • Parking garages; • Bonafde antique shops; • Markets; • Restaurants and snack bars; • Service businesses; and • Any other establishment serving visitors determined to be of the same general character as the above-permitted uses. Allocation: approximately 6 acres. Commercial -Thoroughfare (C-Tl. This land use zone includes primarily motel and restaurant facilities similar to the existing developments that principally serve auto- oriented traffic and require clear visibility from the I-5 corridor. Additional permitted uses would include gas stations and similar traveler- oriented goods and services. Land uses not permitted within this designation are those that would Chula Vista Baytront LCP Amendment III-15 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 60 principally serve pedestrian traffic. These non-permitted uses include convenience retail, food and beverage retail sales, business and personal services. Allocation: approximately 42 acres. Commercial -Professional and Administrative (C-P). Three areas of Professional and Administrative Commercial are provided. The locations are indicated on Zoning Map, Exhibit 8, and include Parcel Area 1-a within the CVBMP proposed for office use, new parcels within the Harbor District, and an existing parcel within the Goodrich Parcel Area 2-b. The permitted uses include administrative office and support uses for the adjacent industrial uses. Allocation: approximately 26 acres. INDUSTRIAL. Three types of industrial uses are designated on the Zoning Map: Limited, Research and Limited, and General. These land uses are confined to an area generally south of "F" Street, plus the inland parcel east of I-5. Existing uses will continue to be permitted and to expand within the limits of the LCP. Allocation: approximately 134 acres. Industrial -Limited (I-L). This zone includes light industrial activities (manufacturing, laboratory, wholesale businesses, storage and warehousing, etc.) and is defined by the provisions of the Chula Vista Municipal Code (CVMC) Chapter 19.44. Allocation: approximately 8 acres. Industrial -Research and Limited (I-RL). This zone includes research and development, light manufacturing, warehousing, and flexible use buildings that combine these uses with office. Allocation: approximately 14 acres. Industrial -General (I-G). This zone provides for large-scale and more intensive industrial uses such as manufacturing and public utility plants. The Goodrich facilities are within this zone. Allocation: approximately 112 acres. PUBLIC AND OPEN SPACE. This zone includes a variety of uses ranging from a Fire Station, landscaped parking within the SDG&E right-of-way (ROW) to the dedicated Open Space of the National Wildlife Refuge. Allocation: approximately 339 acres. Public and Open Space -Public and Quasi-Public (P-Ql. This zone provides regulations for uses in appropriate locations that are maintained by public or publicly controlled agencies such as municipal and county agencies, school districts, and utility companies (e.g., water, gas, electricity, fire station, etc.) The site at the northeast corner of J Street and Bay Boulevard (Parcel 2g) is planned for the construction of a Chula Vista Fire Station." Portions of the SDG&E ROW within the LCP Planning Area may be physically improved at the ground level with landscaped parking areas. To encourage landscape improvements to these areas, development bonuses are permitted for projects adjacent to the ROW that implement the improvements. These bonuses allow the development to increase permitted densities and to use the ROW for parking lot expansion. Bonuses are calculated by applying the permitted land use intensity of the parcel to the adjacent portion of the ROW to be in the project and transferring this added development of the ROW onto the project site. To qualify for the bonus development, along-term lease agreement between the project proponents and SDG&E, for parking on the ROW, is required. Any landscaped parking in the SDGBE ROW north of "F" Street shall be available on weekends and evenings for use by coastal visitors. Allocation: approximately 28 acres.2 Public and Open Space -Parks and Recreation (P-Rl. This zone refers to all physically and/or visually accessible open lands intended for local public ownership. This category includes parks to be developed for public recreation. Parks intended for passive recreational activities will be linked via continuous, publicly accessible pedestrian and bicycle trail systems. One area is zoned as Parks and Recreation and consists of an existing park located within the LCP Planning Area. Allocation: approximately 1 acre. s Approximately 12 acres are presently used for parking by Goodrich. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-16 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 61 Public and Open Space -Open Space/ Wildlife Refuse Overlay (O-S1. This zone applies to the National Wildlife Refuge, which is owned and operated by the USFWS. Uses are limited to wildlife habitat preservation and enhancement, scientific study, and educational uses. Other areas with significant habitat value that are not a part of Federal ownership are shown as Open Space without an overlay designation. In addition to the areas designated by this overlay, Section III-E, Environmental Management, provides specific policies and programs for responding to environmental resources within Parcel Area 3-k (Faivre Street). Determination and administration of permitted uses within the National Wildlife Refuge shall be the responsibility of the USFWS with Coastal Commission Review. Allocation: approximately 339 acres. CIRCULATION/OTHER. This category includes acreage within the major public street ROW (including I-5) and railroad ROWS within the LCP Planning Area. This acreage is not part of the "development area' within the LCP Planning Area. 3. Development Intensity ObjectivelPolicies The intensity of development is determined by height limitations, parking requirements, on-site open space or landscape provisions, traffic and infrastructure capacity, and economic feasibility. The intensity of development consequently varies by land use type. Objective D1.1 Allow development intensity that provides for the economic development of the Bayfront within the capacity of public service and infrastructure systems. ~t#~e-fellew4ag rJ ..r~ri rni-.tn '~ RI~ IL. n~~^ clrclr, R non n...4. n...~l I 'm'InrA nAn OC Sn.,i 'n hn"nh1' ...'Ihnfl h'nn4 In i ~~ nhn c~annrln rrlc chnll ' ni rln n,~ L. 'I.i'n nlhnnLc nhnn o Inn.l a-n~n'n nl-. r. #astl#y:-. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-17 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 62 aac~ped+suian~raEher eft-sFreeirireu adjasenF~°^~° ~'essr+bed-is-iktie Sak~area 2 ~tandarr#~:d ihe~ayfrc~r~t~~cetisPlaa-: Bel}sy-©1,1~-P-erm+f~y-~~e~~}Fy-feF~e @ayfrent+&Shewa is Table 3 2~Page =~-._~ka~,' , wil4~fermie#3erm+Kedinter~sify-Fir-r~~r~.,~.~~ oo~.,.r~jr,,t . tlex+t~4e-24166afiel} a ~+ T tii z ~n io iii _~ T~,,, .. ~.. .-~~,. „r heursiag+n-fhe ' Eea4raf reseA=BvskisF hasbeera~st Policy DI.1.A The allowed development intensity for the LCP Planning Area is shown in Table 3-2. Generally, the permitted building heights, parking standards, and traffic and infrastructure capacity will determine the permitted intensity. Table 3-2 Permitted Development Intensity Zoning Maximum Development Intensity''' Commercial Visitor (C-V) Thoroughfare (C-T) Professional and Administrative (C-P) 0.5 FARZ plus Special Conditions 8 and D 0.5 FARZ 0.752 FAR plus Special Condition A and D Industrial General (1-G) Research and Limited (I-RL) Limited (I-Ll Residential Mixed Harbor District 0.52 FAR 0.52 FAR Per CVMC Chapter 19.44 105 DU per acre 1 Special Conditions have been established for several parcel areas within the LCP Planning Area (refer to Section 19.85.12 of the Bayfront Specific Plan). The special conditions are provided in the Bayfront Specific Plan and include provisions for development on the Goodrich parcel (Parcel Area 2-b), Parcel Area 3-a, and land exchange Parcel Area 2-h. 2 Actual achievable development intensity on any given parcel is a function of site design, landscaping requirements, parking requirements, height limits, setbacks, and environmental constraints. 3 FAR excludes parking structures. CVMC Chula Vista Municipal Code DU dwelling units FAR floor area ratio Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-18 Land Use Plan April 2012 Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 63 TABLE 3-2 PERMITTED DEVELOPME~~ T E D DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY lub 1 - Midbayfront - Cent Resort District (See Table 3-2A) Residen - High Residential: 949,000 sq. ft:/700 du Visitor Co 'al "' Western Parcel: 204,000 sq. ft./ otel zooms; Eastern P3rce1: 200,000 sq. ft 0 hotel rooms Public & Open Sp ses Intensity limited by mini permitted uses; except Cultural Arts Facility 75 sq. ft. (2,000 seats) Subarea 2 - Industrial Industrial (IR & IG) 0.5 except Commercial - VisitoY/Highwa 0.25 ex Commercial - Prof, & Admin. Sp C Landscaped Parking May be in with re Parks & Recreation Into limit Subarea 3 - Southern Parce Industrial 0.5 ' Subareas 4, 5, and 6 Industrial Existing Zoning Iec1 ndition "O" (see notea) pecial Condition ^F" (see, not es) ion "C" (see notes) in adjacent parcel for FAR calculation irovements and use agreement. minimal permitted uses Subarea 7 - Swe er Marah- - \ National Wil Refuge Open Space Determined by IISF6WS - NOTES Floor area ratio or ratio of groae building area to nek devnlop d area. Special Condition "C": FAA of 0.95 pezmitted aabj mt to special conditi See Special Condition ^C" (8 ayfront Specific Plan Sec. V.D~ and Subarna 2 SCandarde a Bayfront Specific Plan, provided that the c eeponding domo11t1ov/removal of exist zuctvree elsewhere on thn Rohr mmpue commensurate with the allowed bonus will o timely £aehion and a e fated traffic impacts will be mitigated to LOS •-". or better a Hay Blvd./•E" screee/z-s interobanEn. _ Special Cenditioh °F": Ia the nvnnt addltioxul land area-ia gaived for developmen prapnrtiea located at the northeast and southeast corvere o£ Bay Boulevard and "J^ Street verang adjacent drainage hannele, the o -efts FAR and setbacks may vary in accordance wiC Spmial Condition "F^ (eayfront Specific Plan Sec. V.DI and Subarea 3 SCandarde~ of'the Bayfront Specific Plan. -' Policy D1.1.B Parcel Areas with development intensities greater than the maximum permitted shall be permitted only if the proposed intensity and site development standards are consistent within the Bayfront Specific Plan by Special Conditions (refer to Section 19.85.12 of the Bayfront Specific Plan) and consistent with resource, public access and view protection policies of the Land Use Plan. B. CIRCULATION, PUBLIC ACCESS, AND PARKING The identified circulation improvements to serve the Bayfront result from a number of basic objectives, including convenient vehicular and pedestrian access, natural habitat protection, traffic capacity Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-19 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 64 constraints, parking, and incorporation of public transit via the trolley stations located east of I-5 at "E" Street and "H" Street. 1. Existing Conditions The 15/SR 54 interchange has been completed and provides regional access to the Bayfront The regional entries to the Bayfront are limited by the off-ramp configurations of Interstate 5 and the location of wetland resources. At the present time, access is available at "E" Street, "H" Street, and "J" Street. One additional bridge at "F" Street provides a local connection to the east side of I-5 but no freeway on- or off-ramps are provided. The southerly and inland portions of the Chula Vista Coastal Zone are adequately served by existing local streets. The "H" Street ramps f+r;rx~ilq - - R;>~+« ._ because of their location primarily serve the Goodrich facilities, and the "J" Street ramps primarily serve Port lands and the marina westerly of ~:~~•~. Goodrich. "J" Street also serves as the ., rk~ert, termination of Marina Parkway ,r~3~~a=.r ,,4t•+«~te+~t~~„n-thy J -Slreei~~ay-P,ou~e.---r+i ,r.4.,~.yc.cwF~~~r.t _u~~l ~,~>r;t+~,.4+.-~Au~t3a it ~ r.+cnin-Tt.- F~>r7 EJ~,icie-tzf~iscJ~k<~+?.. Marina Parkway is the main street through the Bavfront and runs from the "J" StreeUBay Boulevard intersection west toward the marina then north-south parallel to the marina within the Port jurisdiction. Marina Parkway has been constructed as a divided roadway with a landscaped median. lt~p^~~"o-13eextended 1~9f1e-fhe-AAIdh2yffeRt-and « r « «v. ~~c,.. c« „«ro-. , o„ ice, -,.a ~..«,..~o~«~., ,dot andnortkrte-the-A4idbayfren6^~^ ~~.°t{E~-ea~ne6t-to-fhe-E~«•~„«r~aeal., ,~d~'°.^~~,«„ Ti~e{+ropssed new~evela{~men4~ ;r^ ^,,T«^'' ayffent-wt+ick~ will-tal~eaee-essdrem the-~-5 and ~R 54 uia the-~" St. ^~;-ro•^ :. Bay Boulevard is an improved frontage road serving the areas easterly of the railroad ROW. The improved portions extend from "L" Street to "E" Street.---"F° c«.^~«~, p{av^~~~{~~yy9 irapr©ae~in~sc3njanetiea-wwitk~ttie-ReMn-Jr+~expas>stea;-fre+~~ay-Se«s{e.~•~ r^ «~,^ ~~r r_~~ c,.o~-Marsf+. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-20 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 65 TABLE 3-2 PERMITTED DEVELOPMEN"~t~i~~ ^ E D Da-'VELOPMENT INTENSITY ub 1 - Midbayfront Cent Resort District (See Table 3-2A) ' Residen - High Residential: 949, D00 sq. ft:/700 du Visitor Co 'al "' Western Parcel: 204,000 sq. ft./ otel rooms; Eastern Parcel: 200,000 sq. ft 0 ho[el rooms Public & Open Sp ses Intensity limited by mini permitted uses; except Cultural Arts Facility 75 - sq. ft. (2,000 seats) Subarea 2 - Induatrial Industrial (IA & IG) 0.5 except Commercial - Visitor/Highwa 0.25 ex Commercial - Prof. ~& Admin. Sp C Landscaped Parking May be in r with re Parks & Recreation Inte limit Subarea 3 - Soutfiern Parce Industrial 0.5 ' Subareas 4, 5, and 6 Induatrial ~ Existing Zoning ~ecl nditian "C" (see notes) pecial Condition ^F^ (see_not es) ion "C" (see notes) in adjacent parcel for PAR calculation :rovements and use agreement. minimal permitted uses Subarea 7 - Swe er Marefi \ National wil Refuge Open Space Determined by LiSF&WS NOTES Floor area ratio oz ratio of gross building area to net develop d area. special condition "c": FAA of 0.95 permitted aabject Co special conditi See Special Condi<ion "C" (Hay£ront 6pecific Plan Sec. V.Di and Subarea 2 6tandaide a Bayfrmnt specific Plan, provided these the eeponding demolition/removal of existr zuctvzes elsewhere on the Rohr campus conwexssurate with the allowed bomve will a timely fashion snd see Sated traffic inQaete will be mitigated to LOS •D^. or bettor a Hay Blvd./"E" strove/1-s interchange. special Condition ^F": In tha event additioxul land area'ie gained for developmen properties located a[ the northeast and southeast corners of Bay Boulevard and "J" Street covering adj acevt drainage chu:nele, the on-site FAR and setbacks may vary in accordance wit special Condition "F" (Bay£ront specific Plan Sec. V.D) and Subarea 3 Standarda~ d€'ChB eayfront specific Plan. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-21 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 66 TABLE3-2A DELETED. PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY Subarea 1 - Midbayfront Central Resort District Building Allowance r.And IIae Catevorv Residential-Mixed Uae Commercial-visitor Commercial-Prof. & Admin. ~PUblic & Open Space _ ~ Maximum Minimum Building ' - f Maximum DU/Hotel Rooms 00 406,000 300 du 1,00 1,503,000 1,360 rm ,000 60,000 N/A •Pezmitted 1,969, q. Et. The tam lding aq. ft. in any mategory may be exceeded to 30} provided that the 1 e L offeet by a gosruprnding reduction in other c iea, and that the in will not prgduce addiCio~ssl unmiCigaCible enviroomental a. The maximum square feat for the entire Central Resort District oha11 n exceeded. u in. building square Pootago Erom one category to another that es the evel of service below the TraEEia service Thraahold shall not be pnrnit Limited by limited Bermittod uaea. The San Diego Trolley operates on the railroad ROW on the east side of I-5. Both stations adjacent to the Bayfront (at "H" Street and "E" Street) are developed with "park and ride" lots. The trolley schedule creates frequent gate closures that result in traffic interruptions at these major streeUfreeway on- and off-ramps. 2. General Circulation and Public Access Objective/Policies The following objectives and policies relate to the general issues of circulation and public access. These f~ ~Aciad~.?t~ sections provide specifc policy language for roadway improvements, public transit, bicycle/pedestrian circulation, and parking. More detailed application of these general objectives are graphically shown in €xhlbit~`;~e "' =-Exhibits 9a, 9b, and 9c, =1~e Circulation Maps and are described below in the discussion of specific circulation components. Recognition must be given to the fact that the proposed improvements alai -with and associated diagrams are schematic and typical. Additional engineering analysis: errwr~nme++tal revievr and coordination with Caltrans and the Port will be required during the design and construction phases of some roadway improvements projects. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-22 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 67 Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-23 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 68 Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-24 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 69 Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-25 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 70 9bjestlve-pr,~~o,~;~.+ ~d_regienalassesstetl3e-Bajdre~nfftesr~l-5aad-SR-.`~4 ,Y, ,,-;r ~ ~ ,. ... - .. ~-, Li {-~:., F,1 ,. ,rte+Y.11c c.<{=J..=~ ~u4 .... r>F9fl~c _ -~, =_ _ ~..n a.:.o f~ Objective AC 1 All facilities within the jurisdiction of Caltrans shall be designed and operated in a manner consistent with State standards. Objective AC.2 Good regional access should be provided to the Bayfront, 1-5 and SR-54 as well as P-rflviEl~ tE3r convenient access to the Bayfront for visitors and residents of community areas east of 1-5. Policy AC.2.A Convenient access shall be maintained by assuring that traffic congestion does not fall below the City's established threshold standards for road segments: Level of Service (LOS) "C' _' ++~ ~+e~ ~ *~~~+.i~-r~.rx tu~rr: on all street classifications, except for 2 hours per day (tvoically during peak travel periods) when LOS "D" is permitted. AI_~o intersections. The City's threshold standards recognize that the management of the freeway system is under the control of State a~uJ-Foie+-:+i agencies and therefore signalized intersections at freeway ramps are not included in the City's threshold standards. Any proposed development project that has the potential to adversely affect compliance with this threshold standard shall be evaluated with a traffic study and may be approved only if the standards are maintained. All traffic facility improvements assumed or proposed as mitigation for project impacts shall be provided concurrent with or prior to project development. Policy AC.2.B The Port and the City shall participate in amulti-jurisdictional effort conducted by Caltrans and SANDAG to assist in developing a detailed I-5 corridor-level study that will identify transportation improvements along with funding, including federal, state, regional, and local funding sources, and phasing that would reduce congestion management with Caltrans standards on the I-5 South corridor from the SR-54 interchange to the Otay River. Local funding sources identified in the Plan shall include fair-share contributions related to private and/or public development based on nexus, as well as other mechanisms. Policy AC.2 B _ Circulation facilities shall be designed, constructed, and maintained according to State and local standards to ensure that safe and efficient circulation systems are provided. The protection of sensitive habitats may require roadways to be built to lesser standards in order to reduce environmental impacts, provided that such reduced standards do not threaten public safety. Objective A6~ AC.4 Route and design roadways in a manner which minimizes adverse affects on valuable marshlands, protects lands with high recreation value, and avoids fragmentation of developable lands into inadequately sized or located parcels. Policy ~ -' "• AC.4.A Major roadways shall follow the alignments depicted on ~ ~~ ,,'• c in Exhibit 9a, which have been carefully determined with regard to the Objective. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-26 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 71 Policy ~~- € AC.4.6 Minor roadways that serve ~-,...~: proposed development areas shall be evaluated with submittal of project development plans. Such roadways shall not be permitted outside of areas designated for development on the Lard-t3;e-F4a+; -, Ex+~;t-3-Vane.;.-> Zoning Map, Exhibit 8. Policy rG-_ G AC.4.C All road construction and improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the applicable Environmental Management policies (Section III.E). Objective A~4 AC.S Create auto-free zones along the shoreline and other areas which have unique environmental conditions or potential, and make provision for pedestrians and bicyclists. Objective AC-:5 AC.6 Reduce dependency upon the private automobile 6y providing for complementary public transit servive, including smaller 'mini-sit' vehicles or private jitneys. Policy~S-~AAC.6.A-A comprehensive T~^^°r.~,~^^ ,~,fl.~~ Public Access Plan shall be prepared and approved ". The plan shall address the use of private intraproject transit, as well as connection/coordinate with public bus and trolley transit services. The plan shall demonstrate that ofland uses w - _ ~~ ~-s`~-~~'? - - - ~~ _.t~e.~. Policy G-6 A AC.7.A The land use mix identified in this Land Use Plan has been selected to ,,,,~,,, ilus--eb{ecz+ve-avoid congestion of the freeways and connection arterials. Abe en~pi~+asi-~-~~. vis+io+~--servinq,--+ee~eatii~nal-a+ad--resideai+a!-~;ses-wi£hia-4#e~'d1+dbayfr~r+F wi#~-t+alaace-trauel-~deFna+-ids -of--klie~mployare~~t~uenFec#- ~evelep+~~er}t...3hcc~gt~ut eti~e~-areas-e#-Y+~~isaytre~~i- All development within the Bay#ce~aF LCP Planning Area shall be consistent with the land use policies of this Plan. Objective AC. 78 Provide for convenient pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular access to the Bayfront from community areas east of Interstate 5. Policy:lGJ-.~AC.8.A Local access to the Bayfront shall be provided along the same routes that provide regional access-Ira additien the "F" ^~-~^~ ~~ ~+^^ ^ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~+ Policy aF. ; -E AC.8.6 Circulation routes and public transit services that exist within the urban core of Chula Vista shall be extended to and through the Bayfront to integrate the coastal area with the overall community. Development projects within the LCP Planning Area shall incorporate and/or extend the use of these transportation facilities as a part of the development concept. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-27 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 72 Objective AC.9 Implement measures to reduce transportation-related air quality impacts. Policy AC.9.A Limit idling time for commercial vehicles, including delivery and construction vehicles. Policy AC.9.B Use low- or zero-emission vehicles, including construction vehicles. Policy AC.9.C Promote ride sharing programs, for example, by designating a certain percentage of parking spaces for ride sharing vehicles, designating adequate passenger loading and unloading and waiting areas for ride sharing vehicles, and providing a web site or message board for coordinating rides. Policy AC.9.D Provide the necessary facilities and infrastructure to encourage the use of low- or zero-emission vehicles (e.g., electric vehicle charging facilities and conveniently located alternative fueling). Policy AC.9.E Provide public transit incentives, such as free or low-cost monthly transit passes. Policy AC.9.F For commercial projects, provide adequate bicycle parking near building entrances to promote cyclist safety, security, and convenience. For large employers, provide facilities that encourage bicycle commuting, including (for example) locked bicycle storage or covered or indoor bicycle parking. Policy AC.9.G Institute a telecommute work program. Provide information, training, and incentives to encourage participation. Provide incentives for equipment purchases to allow high- quality teleconferences. Policy AC.9.H Provide information on all options for individuals and businesses to reduce transportation-related emissions. Provide education and information about public transportation. 3. Roadway Improvement Objective/Policies The following objectives/policies relate to the construction and improvement of roadways within the ;rt~,:r.r LCP Planning Area. All onsite roadways in the Chula Vista Bayfront Master Plan are proposed to be in the Port's jurisdiction. 9l~jecNve-Rl-~-- tviarina-F~rkway~nd-Tidelands Avenge are-lo-Ne-eon stSructed-te~erae-development wi€hir}ihe-AAidbay-free t~t~are~ Objective R1.1 Improve Bayfront access through improvements to Marina Parkway, the "E" Street bridge, "H"Street, 'J" Street, and on- and off-ramps to 1-5. Public access to the Chula Vista Nature Center on the National Wildlife Refuge shall be maintained. Rflltey~l--1-A~"„a,,• ~a-Rarkway-willk~e-ex€e€ear-~aA4~Or-S{reef-fe~ESept€er-tk~eas{er+~ mast-segmenfdesc~r+bed bebw}Srer~iis impreved-{ern~inasaE ihe+ierth-edge o€ {i~Chala Vista Marian Pert~is{rist-proper -parwaY-~^ «~~F"~€reef~alew~t- TadelarrdsAvenae~r-egalvalent-access all-ex{end-frerm Marina~arkway-norNa-t© sewelhe small deve4ery+meat-pars~l-I©Ea€edeast-~r',~".~~~9nrr~on~,nT.~j~#€ie-gafiasity ^a.,d ga€oty~nd create a-parkway ckaaracler~er-Mar+nab'arkway,-ne-F,arbside-parking~hc3t~ld-be#oermi€tec~sirrce Noe e#f-street-parking standards~ierein~wll-grovide-adegaate-~arking~a+-coastal-viskors.--Nandssaped king an {I?ezSL?G~€-RAW-rujrthof Lagoon-Drave~l~aU-#~e-available- far everAcw andspec~alevenf parling-derTaands Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-28 Land Use Plan April 2012 Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 73 Policy RI.1.A The alignment of Marina Parkway within the Port property will move westerly to bypass the edge of the existing "F&G" Street Marsh. This alignment will introduce major views of the waterfront from the roadway. Marina Parkway will become a S- lane Class II collector street running north-south between "E" Street (north of "H" Street) and "J" Street. Policy RI.1.6 "E" Street shall be extended west as a 4-lane Class I collector street from Bav Boulevard westerly to the new "F" Street intersection. This will provide additional capacity to maintain adequate traffic flow at the major northern protect entry "E" Street shall then change to a 2-lane Class II collector street through the remainder of the Sweetwater District and into the Harbor District. "E" Street will turn into Marina Parkway at "H" Street. 9~J26Nve-RI 3-€xteRd='F" cr~r..~' . ~Stef4}~s-L2gooR-Dr+ve-t6~e_, _,---,.~-, •, ~~••_^~ ..----- - '- ~~- Policy RI.1C "F" Street (Lagoon Drivel shall be removed from the west end of the Goodrich property west, adjacent to the "F&G" Street Marsh. "F" Street shall terminate at a cul- d-sac. The road will be redirected north as a Class II 2-lane collector street and intersect with the extension of "E" Street to facilitate the movement of traffic into the Bavfront. "F" Street shall cross "E" Street to access facilities in the Sweetwater District. including parking for the Chula Vista Nature Center located in the Sweetwater Marsh National Wildlife Refuge. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-29 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 74 ©~~ 5kiati~e~3n- . has beenintegcated~nie tk}e-levee witaa parkingael-and-bas~'~t~„3h^~' be{~r }3e2ntry. Fiefag~~cipptemealai #~ackincJ-wFltbe preuide~u} ~k-f~Park-pufpos~~r'~~rd..; p°~ .2-f~ Policv RI 1 D Public access to the Chula Vista Nature Center shall be restricted to shuttle bus operation to minimize disturbance to the sensitive resources of the refuge. The shuttle bus access route shall be a controlled access 20-foot roadwav on the existing southern levee This existing route has been integrated into the levee without undue impact on the adjacent marshes A small public parking lot and bus shelter shall be provided in the Sweetwater District at the entry to the Sweetwater Marsh National Wildlife Refuge Supplemental parking shall be provided in the landscaped SDG&E ROW as part of the parking for parks and recreational purposes required under Policv A. P K3. Policv RI 1 E "H" Street shall be extended west to Street A (a new street) as a 5-lane major street. H" Street will serve as a major central entrance to the Bavfront area. "H" Street shall continue west from Street A to Marina Parkway as a 4-lane major street, at which point it shall continue west as a 3-lane Class II collector street until it intersects with "E" Street. Polic R1.1.F Street A will be a new street that will run north-south between Parcel Areas 2-f and 2- h. Street A shall be constructed as a 4-lane Class I collector street. Policv RI 1 G Bav Boulevard will continue to serve as a 2-lane Class II collector street south of "J" Street Bav Boulevard will serve as a 2-lane Class III collector street north of 'J Street to "F" Street The portion of Bav Boulevard located north of "F" Street will be a 2 lane Class II collector street Bav Boulevard will cross "E" Street and become a S- lane Class II collector to serve parcels lust west of the I-5 off-ramp and north of "E" Street. Policv RI 1 H Street C is a proposed new street that extends from Street "A" between "J" Street and Policv RI 1 I "J" Street shall b~ extended west from Bav Boulevard at the Gateway entrance to the intersection with Street A as a 6-lane major street "J" Street shall continue west from Street A to Marina Parkwav as a 4-lane major street following which it shall continue west as a 2-lane Class III collector street until it terminates at the south end of the marina. Policv RI 1 J Street B is a proposed new street that will extend from the intersection of Street A and "J" Street with a connection back to Bav Boulevard Street B shall be constructed as a 2-lane Class III collector street. Policv RI 1 K Additional access shall be constructed to the Bavfront from the I-5 off-ramps including (1) an exclusive southbound right-turn lane for the "E" Street/I-5 southbound off-ramp and (2) an exclusive southbound right-turn lane for the "H" Street/I-5 southbound off- ramps. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment 11130 April 2U12 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 75 Policy RI.1.L Rebuild the portion of Marina Parkway fronting 2F between Sandpiper Way and J Street as a 3-lane Class II Collector with excess ROW used for pedestrian facilities. 4. Public Transit Objective/Policies The Bayfront's transportation system was developed to focus vehicular activity on the eastern edges of the property, near I-5 and its interchanges, by placing a majority of the common parking areas on the eastern properties, while designing for pedestrian connections and transit service. This will result in narrower, more pedestrian-friendly streets along the waterfront. Strong public transit support is needed to ensure access to the western portion fo the bayfront while still limiting vehicular trips. There are ttuee two major public transit objectives for the Bayfront: T+~ey ara (1) maximize use of the two trolley stops adjacent to the Bayfront area and (2) provide future shuttle bus service to interconnect the Bayfront with the trolley stations and the adjacent community ~ .. Objective PT.1 Maximize use of the public transit services by visitors and residents of the Bayfront. D.+I'... DT 1 A .-vrroy-r r-~-~r-' ~L.vll h~ ....I.1. .1 mac(`..... L. T C DI i L. .. .. ,.....~.. vmrrpic^ ~BRF Inn~c.,l~,: Policy PT. 1.A Bus Improvements. Provide for convenient bus stop locations on convenient travel loops within the Bayfront and at areas of concentrated activity. Policy PT.1.B Pedestrian Access. Provide for convenient, direct pedistrian access to the Mtidbaytrent-Bayfront from the "E" and "H" Street Trolley Stations. Encourage the use of alternate transportation by also including bike and pedestrian pathways, water taxis, and a private employee parking shuttle. Policy PT.1.C The project shall include connections to the planned Bayshore Bikeway and provide an additional local bikeway loop that will be safer and more scenic as it is located closer to-the water. Pelisj PT.1-~ The and-epper ~,1~.'n" D...L "C" mar~.m-~am~- ~ . ~~I~f', DT 7 Cr. ~a r ~611Gy-A asa-parFefa{!-developmeat~repe ,~~ .+ ;«h~~-k}c-#aril+ti...,.,..:i:~,ct~~~i~aydrer~- Objective PT.2 Use of public transit services by visitors and residents of the Bayfront should be promoted and private traus+~shuttle services should be encouraged where feasible. c:huia Vista Baytront LCP Amendment III31 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 76 The Port and City shall explore the operating and funding potential for a shuttle service that would link various destinations within the western portions of Chula Vista, including the Chula Vista Bayfront plan area. Policy RT:1 -Pr PT.2.A The Bayfreat-J'+arrLCP recognizes that the connections to the trolley system are significant benefits to development in the Bayfront. Opportunities for interconnecting the Bayfront with the existing trolley stations are included in the Bayfront area. These opportunities shall include convenient shuttle bus stop locations on major travel loops within the Bayfront and at areas of concentrated activity (Exhibit 9a). Policy o~T-., n PT.2.B The Circulation Element provides for roadway ROWs with sufficient capacity and opportunities for shuttle bus stop locations to facilitate convenient shuttle bus services into the Bayfront along Marina Parkway, "E" Street, "F" Street", "H" Street, Street A, and Street C. This capacity shall be maintained to provide the greatest flexibility in the routing of future shuttle bus service into the Bayfront and to achieve an effective connection to the trolley system. Policy PT.2.C Tk~She~1a ~+sta-Bayireaf shattle~ervise~euld ser~+ce N~eiaastec$',a:-a"r~-and shotrl +„~w+cc;;~cv+ w c;ensiderai+ens Ensure that the shuttle has fewer stops than a conventional bus and is located as close as possible to the major traffic generators. Policy PT.2.D Plan the general route of the transit shuttle to travel along Third Avenue between F Street and H Street, along F Street between Woodlawn Avenue and Third Avenue, along Woodlawn Avenue between E Street and F Street, along E Street, Marina Parkway, Street C, and Street A within the Bayfront development area, and along H Street between the Bayfront and Third Avenue Policy PT.2.E Plan the route to operate as a two-way loop with stops in both directions. Policy PT.2F Plan for shuttles to run every 15 to 30 minutes depending upon ridership and funding availability. 5. Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation Objective/Policies i:., Major pedestrian circulation routes and a regional bicycle route are included on the Circulation Map, Fah+~++ ~~ t~~~~•r+ Maps, Exhibits 9b and 9c. ++>- Provision of these routes will provide significant public access to the waterfront and within the Bayfront ~Jut'e.nhiiwrit area »~-~~~~- ~ ->h~~~~ ~~i q,-,»-r~+3+<s- and will result in a substantial increase in both the quantdy and quality of available public access to the shoreline. =_~h+.. ht-~-I-' : I f ~ +'d:;.g. 1, ,~ iii,-~ -~ ~ esc i ~I ~ , :,, ~~I,+'+~.. Objective PB 1 Pedestrian access to the shoreline should be provided as well as bicvcle routes for alternative access and circulation within the Bavfront area. Policv P8.1.A Existing bikeway corridors along roads and highways should be upgraded, as feasible, to reduce, minimize or eliminate any potential hazards between motor vehicles and bicycles, consistent with sensitive environmental resource and visual Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-32 Land Use Plan April 2012 Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 77 resource protection policies. Improvements to any roadway containing a bikeway should not adversely affect the provision of bicycle use, to the extent feasible. Policy ~=-=+ P8.1.B SenNnaeus- 41z tl.'V~I; ~n n ..'.ln.~l ..~ lL.'n !hn ...L .....J p No pedestrian or bicycle paths are to be located on the southern or eastern edges of the "F&G" Street Marsh due to the limited setback area. Policy?c3,-. SPB.1.C .~ :~c~3;~ To provide continuity with adjacent planning areas, pedestrian shoreline access shall interconnect with other existing or proposed circulation routes within the Port Master Plan (Exhibit 9b). Project level planning and coordination shall provide for: ConnectionSeaN~ to Port Lands. ++~- ~~~--~,aafina-F-afkw~-yea Throughout the Ba ront public access will be integrated with other-exi~t+r'9~ F'r-0Posed-r+rr~laata~~a routes-Port development. This will result in a continuous public access routes with intermittent exposure to the water's edge within the Port lands. Connection North to Sweetwater River Protect Pedestrian and bicycle routes in the Bayfront shall interconnect with the recreational improvements included in the Caltrans/Army Corps of Engineers project, and/or the Chula Vista Greenbelt trail system proposed in the Sweetwater River Valley. The filling of wetlands for bike paths is not permitted, including, but not limited to, any extension of the toe of the Caltrans freeway fill slope into the mitigation areas of the connector marsh. Connection with Chula Vista Neighborhoods Pedestrian routes will interconnect major open spaces in the Bayfront area to adjacent Chula Vista neighborhoods via "E" Street, "F" Street, "H" Street. and "J" StrStreet. Policy PB.1.D Provide a continuous open space system, fully accessible to the public, which would seamlessly connect the Sweetwater, Harbor, and Otay Districts through components such as a continuous shoreline promenade or baywalk and a continuous bicycle path linking the parks and ultimately creating greenbelt linkages. ~'~e'~-n ~ °.~~n~ ~s{e-ro..l~ r~^Itea+at;, .z~,.r e+rsa4a€,.~-,-,-.,:.,._bar Policy A P-B,~A. P6.1.E The Circulation Map (Exhibit 9c) indicates extensive bicycle routes incorporated with the pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems. '^ '~'^~^ The bicvcle routes will consist of constructing a segment of the planned Bavshore Bikeway regional bicvcle route in addition to constructing a bicvcle spur that creates a loon through the Bavfront and back to the Bavshore Bikewav ("Bavfront Looo") Policy PB.1.F The Bavshore Bikewav shall be constructed as a Class I bike path facility within the existing SDG&E utility corridor running north-south from "E" Street to Main Street The Bikewav shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the applicable Environmental Management policies (Section III E) The construction of this segment of the Bavshore Bikewav shall occur following undergrounding of the high-voltage powerlines. In addition agreement from Goodrich for access through their site is required. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-33 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 78 Policy PB 1 G The "Bavfront Loop" shall be constructed through the Bayfront with connections to the Bavshore Bikeway The Bavfront Loop shall begin at the "E" StreeUBavshore Bikewav intersection traverse through the proposed Bavfront area, and rejoin the Bavshore Bikewav south of L Street. The Bayfront Loop shall be an off-street Class I bike path (12-foot total width) with minimal crossings of vehicular roadways. 6. Parking Objective/Policies Parking will generally be incorporated into the private development in the Bayfront with some additional off-street and on-street public parking to serve the community parks and other open space resources. While provision of adequate parking for all uses in the Bayfront is an important issue, undergrounding ~. +~~;- ~~~-~- or providing landscaping/screening to improve the appearance of large parking areas is also important. Utilizing "shared parking' among uses that have predictable and opposite peak parking demands is encouraged. • r F-~.: ~:i .~.ic.u~1atc,~+i!1[ir?(~r31~rJ'!NU{FNii-~{~=:==~ {h.~~. ~=~Fr: iF~F- Objective PK.1 Provide adequate parking should be provided for all developed uses in the Bayfront, including parking for all public park and open space uses in the Bavfront Parking should be provided in an efficient manner sharing spaces among uses when practical and in a manner that does not intrude upon the scenic qualities of the eavfront. Parking within the SDG&E ROW parcels should be provided to meet parking requirements provided the ROW parking is landscaped to improve the overall appearance of the Bavfront. Policv PK.1.A New development shall provide off-street parking sufficient to serve the approved use in order to minimize impacts to public street parking available for coastal access and recreation. Policv PK.1.B Adequate parking should be provided to serve coastal access and recreation uses. Existing parking areas serving recreational uses may not be displaced unless a comparable replacement area is provided. Policy PK.1.AC Off-street parking spaces shall be provided for developed uses according to the following schedule: Business and professional offices: 1 space per 300 square feet of floor area; minimum of 4 spaces. Dance assembly or exhibition halls without fixed seats: 1 space per 50 square feet of floor area used for dancing or assembly. Dwellings, multiple: 1 1-.b-space per studio ci ~.~F i>e~ ~- ~~ ~+n~i;1.5 spaces per 1 bedroom unit; 2 spaces per two-bedroom or larger unit; ~:~ spaces-per-threebedteona or larger~+~it {iae~{~de s ~3syase Pe~rest~ark+ng ): Hotels. motels: 1 space for each living or sleeping unit, plus 1 space for every 25 rOOR1S Or pgftlOn thereof. ~Fd~34eIF -3~1'I c~nt+-~l .!- t!I ! ~ -;+Sei1 1 u ~;, 1. lc~.rn Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-34 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 79 Manufacturing plants, research and testing laboratories: 1 space per 1.5 persons employed at any one time in the normal operation of the plant or 1 space per 800 square feet of floor area, whichever is greater. Medical and dental offices and clinics: 1 space per 200 square feet of floor area; minimum of 5 spaces. Public park/open space: 1 parking place for every 10.000 square feet of park or accessible open space. Restaurants, bars. and night clubs: 1 space per 2.5 permanent seats, excluding any dance floor or assembly area without fixed seats, which shall be calculated separately at 1 space per 50 square feet of floor area. Restaurants -drive-in, snack stands, or fast food: 15 spaces minimum, or 1 space per 2.5 permanent seats, whichever is greater. Retail stores: 1 space per 200 square feet of floor area; retail uses located on Parcel Areas 2-f and 2-h shall provide a minimum of 4 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of retail space. Sports arenas, auditoriums and theaters: 1 space per 3.5 seats of maximum seating capacity. Wholesale establishments, warehouses, and service and maintenance centers: 1 space per 1.5 persons employed at any one time in the normal operation of the plant or 1 space per 1,000 square feet of floor area, whichever is greater. Uses not listed: as required by Ghiala-Y""(sta-Zfr~iaq-F#~+~a;ase CVMC Policy PK.1.BD Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided for developed uses according to the following schedule. Only those uses listed below are required to provide bicycle parking. Bicycle parking facilities shall be fixed storage racks or devices designed to secure the fame and wheel of the bicycle.: Business and professional offices (over 20,000 square feet of gross floor area): 5 spaces._ Shopping center (over 50,000 square feet of gross floor area): 1 space per 33 automobile spaces required. Fast food restaurant. coffee shop, or delicatessen: 5 spaces. Other eating and drinking establishments: 2 spaces. Commercial recreation: 1 space per 33 automobile spaces required. Only those uses listed above are required to provide motorcycle parking and bicycle parking facilities. Bicycle parking facilities shall be fixed storage racks or devices designed to secure the frame and wheel of the bicycle. o ~ ~.1 ~ ~Y 3ie 240 iF2i& ~2K?r .. ' i r F -.~:?2h;P-v!u`c+H_-1a . ^. „rcT,i, ~,2_9~-... +1_ 9 a-FO~a .~~,~..:E.Fnt.a Heron . Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-35 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 80 Policy ~'.v' :; -_PK 1 E Off-street public parking areas shall be provided for community parks. The parking areas shall be integrated into the open space areas close to the roadways and where possible screened from view ~/:G= ,~ max. -~. __, F.i.4~:.;:. fcK ,. ~> .:yc~f~ -«=~-H.~-r-uak~+c:-3--cw~:-~+ ,-,Ft+-,-~.' SF.r ~,,.":. .,_,.._: --~. -.__.. --~1=__ . _,;,~4 t,-,a ~ ~;es -u. asp skw:i r. >rEa.k~-d- No additional parking is required for the one public park that exists within the LCP Planning Area (1-f) and no new public parks are proposed however potential future public parks shall require one parking space for every 10 000 square feet of park or accessible open space New public parks will be located within the Port's jurisdiction and will be governed by the provisions of the Port Master Plan No separate parking is required for the National Wildlife Refuge. Parking for public parks shall be provided in areas designated and exclusively reserved for public park users. This restriction shall be enforced during the operating hours of the public park Public parks shall be open in accordance with Citv standard operating hours. After-hours parking will not be restricted and may be shared with private development in accordance with other parking policies in t~~_~,~;F'--this specific plan. Cir,.~-~rav G'.K ~r< ,=1. ~.~ ..e.<,.:.~ ter: Ufsic~ia o.:hnr>L;r s:,ari~cj-spd~,Frsar~.,r ;,r.,.ar~.~::«-•, F,rasY+ral. Policy ~ ~ =~ ~+ PK.1.F Implementation of the "shared parking" concept shall be permitted where it can. be demonstrated that the proposed mix of uses have predictable parking demands that do not significantly overlap. The methods and criteria set forth in Shared Parking published by the Urban Land Institute shall be used to calculate the parking reduction permitted within amixed-use project. No reduction shall be permitted without specific justification. No reduction in residential parking or public recreational parking shall be permitted. Any parking that is shared among uses shall be available for use during normal operating hours and shall not be reserved or otherwise restricted. Control of uses intended to use shared parking shall be by Conditional Use Permit and shall require the execution of deed restrictions and other long-term commitments for the provision of parking. 1, I2,~w=1 P,•u-Flt 1- R2f k,nr{+.i1 -~N~?" i~r~ An ic.FF ai d+l.=.;u+yi V~'k rr;ll~It,FC n(~(.:~ is 1 ~iX ~-r IE Cl ..,I~~:c.~ ~~i ~ir~ I~s~~1r~?nt Policy F :- ~ -~ PK.1.G h~- ?res-=: To maintain views from the major roadways to the shoreline and major development sites, street side parking shall not be permitted along any of the major roadways identified in the Circulation Plan, including Marina Parkway, t.~>~-; : ~~-:+~+~- "E" Street, "F" Street I -:-.ors- ~~+u~~,or Bay Boulevard. Policy ~'}`~ ?-F PK.1.H Parking included as part of private development shall provide for the following: Location: Parking shall be located in areas away from the shoreline and public open space corridors. Screening. '~"~?~e,.---::,;+=::i..:= To the greatest extent possible, open parking will be screened from view from the major arterials by the use of landscaped berms, tree planting, and building placement Type. To the greatest extent :. - -_possible, open, large-scale parking will be avoided in favor of underground, op diem, or smaller disaggregated parking areas separated by buildings or landscaping. Parking structures shall be encouraged where additional open space or other public benefit can be provided. A-a~u+a}~+m-7z"-r~+t~tu' Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment 11136 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 81 G.~a~r ~.-o_+'h-.`~--i#+i+ye-tire-~-:~§,-€._k~u'4~-,:-r;~aa:--F.ark}FEU.-rer~~irewcti:k~.--i#-:k-+s +~sr,~-.;;a~3;#- rR9jir<) e-JlE 8j)i?CaKal9 ur G1 Fkle {ia di fFiGH-: Policy?+~::raPK1.1 Where parking is incorporated into the SDG&E ROW, th+a~ayrT-t+~e-tisP-cz i;cams,;~Kek~aK~s-E~,`?he-~4aa, the parking areas shall be landscaped with a perimeter planting of trees and ground cover. The tree planting will be tightly spaced to provide a dense canopy at eye level. Tree species will be limited to those that will not interfere with the overhead power lines and trimmed as necessary to meet standards of SDG&E. Due to environmental management requirements, this policy does not apply to Subarea 1: Sweetwater District. C. PHYSICAL FORM AND APPEARANCE The Bayfront provides a unique opportunity to establish a harmonious relationship between the natural setting and the man-made environment. The area's natural resources and scenic quality provide a setting that has a distinctive appearance and, in turn, can promote economic success for activities located in proximity. to it. Moreover, development that is properly sited and designed can support these natural areas in permanent reserve and provide for controlled access and enjoyment of them by the public. 1. Existing Conditions The Bayfront, by virtue of its location on San Diego Bay, represents a visual resource for the City and the region. Given the visibility of the coastal zone from major highways and streets, the Bayfront has the potential to create a defining City image. The Bayfront is characterized, from north to south, by the National Wildlife Refuge and the Alatufe '^+^~^~^'^' ~^ ~'^^'^~ Chula Vista Nature Center a relatively flat upland area that is currently vacant ( ,major office and industrial facilities associated with Fehr-I~~-Goodrich, the SDGBE pewefplan6 switchyard, the South Bay Power Plant, salt ponds, and a variety of smaller commercial and industrial uses to the south and parallel to the west side of I-5. Existing landmarks in the Bayfront are the "'°+ .,, '^+^.^.^'^~ „o r~^..,. Chula Vista Nature Center, the FUe.#c Goodrich facilities, and the ~DC~€ South Bay Power Plant with tall stacks. ~~Q^+~ ^^' 2. General Form and Appearance ObjectivelPolicies The basic objective to integrate man's use of the land arid water resources into a sensitive natural environment is provided through the implementing policies below. The following sections provide specific policy language for architectural edges, views, and landscape. Objective FA 1 The existino substandard industrial imaoe of the Bavfront should be chanced by developino a new identity consonant with its future public and commercial recreational Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-37 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 82 role The visual quality of the shoreline should be improved by promoting both public and private uses that will provide for proper restoration landscaping and maintenance of shoreline areas. Structures or conditions that have a blighting influence on the area should be removed or mitigated through facade enhancements and landscaping. Finally a readily understandable and memorable relationship of the Bayfront (and the areas and elements that comprise it) to adioininp areas of Chula Vista. including the freeway and arterial approaches to the Bayfront. should be developed. P' I~~-~12-~'~r@~°V~iSf°F~3RS6f-tl-~€RWGAnRl2ntal~ AA,...-...mm~n~ Cc~n4'.. ..f ~hn I n.,.~l I low Dl~n droll t~~r~rync~.~a.ntc~~~~~{~~sv~~m~c Ih-a/c1'nf'n~~_. ;l}-the ~te-~O9e-vrc. .....4renle~ri vna ....-..HO... ~'~ .,, hoolih r!-.L. . h'L. ~,t~~~,tlvE-Ft ~ t;fianr~ rt__.•.;t.~c~s~ibsiaa~,rfJ~ulHSt=ia+-una;eEtihe-~ayf+or~: a~~ ,.~- ict~ ~uyr-«;n=,.~.-,w wcil- ~ u.~ .. ,,~,t.+;r~rkt-rF~cr+rruu,ia~w4cr~iifinal-tale- Policy Fi..:.FA.1.A New development within the E~>q`<:+:-. LCP Planning Area shall be consistent with the land use designations permitted in the Land Use section. The majority of new development shall be visitor-serving commercial, r>a~--rF,=eat---=, commercial professional and administrative, and residential, with only a very limited amount of additional industrial development permitted. The scale of these new uses, combined with improved landscaping and screening of existing industrial development, will benefit the image of the Bayfront as a whole. , ,, , ~ ca:L~r-F.,. :Il ttq:.. ~ku is .,., ,~ r- .._i ,~y ~~ '. •)lq I 1ht15 >1 t 1`r 2~~• - ~.. ~,,h-+n~lll~~a~Mi~t;,rl>r„der;H=.{;,r„'.t~.r~ihc~d~.caF,.,;c+-an.}raainte~,h~ir er~f~,h~u el~nP ;yea Policy F,>.:'. '. FA.1.B The Land Use Plan designates improved parkland and open space along the shoreline area of the A4idbaytroai-Bayfront. Landscape and improvement standards for these areas will result in a major improvement in the visual quality of the shoreline. '_~ . F. _=~n"~ .i .~4 ~-~y~la I-.. ~p.~~ ~~rbdioc ~,r .~n~ltinu~,.wvct ~. ix q~~,,l ~~yurt t.: a-U>,,. a~~:,, Policy F,'~ -; ~4 FA.1.C New development within the Favir:>n. LCP Planning Area shall be constructed according to the high-quality and aesthetic standards set forth in the Land Use Plan. Continuing development and/or redevelopment will displace abandoned and substandard structures that have a blighting influence. Any vegetative areas disturbed by development shall be =c~ua=le~.~1:: re-landscaped. NoweNe~ The landscaping shall be consistent with the Environmental Management policies herein and shall give priority to the use ofdrought-tolerant plant materials. Cat ~.-t'tlb c,.F , ~-~g~s~.a+- .q ~~}~d~.d Ua+rlt~lz!al «~>lc_.~ir' +ne-niw--ak~l<+ ,g1:1a~=t ~Niplaf- 1l+•• t. 9F'4r::: ~i ...rx? ti a rNF-.i4-pl .-1 t-Ig~7~k=:ass-vvh~tJ; t ~n,h I~«.il +-l•+-~Jjfy~~n ~.i a~Fia~ .~( _ r..lla w ~. ;a~T in ., ~-, ~r~J Policy ~~~ ~~ FA.1.D New develc~+mer;t-projects~u >>~} ~~~ + ~~lt~?~ ,~, .~' shall be controlled by policies herein, including specific height, use, parking, and development intensity restrictions. In addition, +t-development shall be further reviewed by the City for consistency with the LUP policies e-0atxeUed-by-~ +,~+~;~~r I't.:~~ tl~ai-will-tally-inteclrate Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment 11138 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 83 tb~projesi-to ensure that projects are fully integrated with adjacent areas, thereby creating a united project in appearance and function. Policy FA.1.E All development projects shall be required to undergo a design review process (which includes architectural, site plan, landscape, and signage design), prior to the issuance of building permits, to ensure compliance with objectives and specific requirements of the City's Design Manual, General Plan, and appropriate zone or Area Development Plan. Objective FA.2 Improvements to the public realm should be made in conjunction with improvements to individual parcels through private development. Policy FA.2.A Concurrent with the preparation of Phase I infrastructure design plans for E and H Streets, a Gateway plan shall be prepared for E and H Streets. Prior to issuance of occupancy for any projects within the Port's jurisdiction in Phase I, the E and H Street Gateway plan shall be approved by the Port and City's Directors of Planning and Building. The E and H Street Gateway plan shall be coordinated with the Gateway plan far J Street. Policy FA.2.B Concurrent with development of Parcel 2f, the applicant shall submit a Gateway plan for J Street for City Design Review consideration. Prior to issuance of any building permits, the J Street Gateway plan shall be approved by the Director of Planning and Building in coordination with the Port's Director of Planning. The J Street Gateway plan shall be coordinated with the Gateway plan for E and H Streets. Further policies guiding Gateway design are provided in the following section (III.C.3) Policy FA.2.C The City shall create unique landscape designs and standards for medians for each major thoroughfare to distinguish each from the other and to provide a special identity for districts and neighborhoods. Policy FA.2.D The landscape designs and standards shall include a coordinated street furniture palette including waste containers and benches, to be implemented throughout the community at appropriate locations. Policy FA.2.E Prior to the approval of projects that include walls that back onto roadways, the City shall require that the design achieves a uniform appearance from the street. The walls shall be uniform in height, use of materials, and color, but also incorporate elements that add visual interest, such as pilasters. Policy FA.2.F Prior to issuance of Coastal Development Permits for projects within the City's jurisdiction, the project developer shall ensure that design plans for any large scale projects (greater than two stories in height) shall incorporate standard design techniques such as articulated facades, distributed building massing, horizontal banding, stepping back of buildings, and varied color schemes to separate the building base from its upper elevation and color changes such that vertical elements are interrupted and smaller scale massing implemented. These plans shall be implemented for large project components to diminish imposing building edges, monotonous facades and straight-edge building rooflines and profiles. This shall be done to the satisfaction of the City of Chula Vista Planning Director. Objective FA.3 To provide aesthetic improvements to existing and new development, including establishing clearly identifiable gateways to the Bayfront, preserving existing views Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment 11139 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 84 and creating enhanced views with development, and encouraging high-quality, well- integrated, mixed-use development with a harmonious relationship between sensitive habitats and the built environment. The factors that are important to achieve this objective are: , • Landscape Character Bayfront Gateways • Architectural Edges • Views • Building Placement • Architectural Character • Wildlife Protection Policy FA.3.A Landscaping shall be used to screen those elements of the existing built environment where necessary. New development within the Chula Vista Bayfront Master Plan area shall also be accompanied by a comprehensive landscape plan. Policy FA.3.B Landscaping shall provide visual connections that integrate the surrounding environment to the new development. Policy FA.3.C The landscape pattern and Bayfront Gateways shall be coordinated with the landscape form and appearance requirements of the Port Master Plan. Policy FA.3.D Soft architectural edges shall be used where development meets public parks and open space. Soft edges are generally composed of smaller increments of change from building mass to open area. Such edges emphasize a transition instead of an abrupt change. PolicyFA.3.E In addition to the wetlands setback policies (S2.C1E) and building height policies (S2.C1 E) of this Land Use Plan, the Bayfront Specific Plan shall establish building setbacks from public streets and lot boundaries to ensure appropriate building placement. Policy FA.3.F To increase view opportunities through developments, high- and mid-rise residential towers shall be oriented with their long sides parallel to the major view corridors. Policy FA.3.G A unifying, high-quality architectural character and design shall be established for all new buildings and fagade enhancements. Policy FA.3.H The following basic guidelines shall be followed in the design of buildings and structures: Colors -Coloration shall be perceived as a single thematic impression made up of subtle variations. Materials -Reflective materials shall not be used. The use of reflective glass is prohibited. Sheet metal finish surfaces shall be discouraged. The use of stucco, wood, and concrete shall be encouraged. Window Openings -Window openings or patterns, especially in the mid-rise and high-rise buildings, shall avoid monotonous patterning. Smaller units of glazing and openings shall be favored over larger, single-paned openings. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-40 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 85 Roofs -Flat roofs without varied parapets are discouraged. Variation in roof forms and parapet treatments shall be enwuraged. To discourage avian predators, roof designs shall incorporate anti-perching elements as stipulated in the design requirements developed in cooperation with the USF&WS and to be incorporated in the Natural Resources Management Plan. Policy FA.3.1 The following basic guidelines shall be followed in regard to streetscape and pedestrian features: Architectural and street furniture detailing shall contribute to the ambience of the new development. This is most effective at the pedestrian level where such details can readily be seen. Detailing opportunities include: • Floor paving patterns • Monuments • Fountains • Bollards • Railings • Window shape and window pane mullions • Door treatments • Light standards and lighting fixtures in general • Public outdoor seating • Trash/ash receptacles • Textile amenities -banners, awnings, umbrellas • Community sign boards • Planting urns and areas • Niches in walls and wall decorations in general All of the above-cited elements shall be chosen and placed in a manner consistent for all new development to "compose" an overall theme or character reflecting the goal of a vibrant, coastal atmosphere. Objective FA.4 Development shall have a unifying, high quality architectural character and design. Policy FA.4.A The siting and orientation of major high-rise buildings shall respect environmental issues. Such buildings shall be set back from the marsh to preclude their shadows from falling on the sensitive wetlands. In addition, the shall have non-reflective surface materials and be of muted colors. Policy FA.4.B A Bayfront Cultural and Design Committee ("BCDC") shall be formed to advise the District in addressing the design of parks, cultural facilities, and development projects. The public participation process for the BCDC will include broad community representation and will be modeled after the Community Advisory Committee (CAC) process. Membership will include at least one member each from the District, Chula Vista Planning Commission, Design Review Committee, and Resource Conservation Committee. The BCDC will advise the District in the establishment of CVBMP design guidelines to address cohesive development and streetscape design standards, walkways and bikeways design to promote safe walking and biking, standards for design of park areas, and cultural facilities but will not address NRMP and Wildlife Habitat Areas design guidelines described above. A minimum of three public meeting/workshops will be held to establish the design guidelines. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-41 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 86 To promote these objectives and policies, b -.. , nF:r,=ar-, 4 ,>~=,w n,-:~-~ -;-- _ ,-- 1=1=-three major components have been identified that comprise the physical form of the area: (1) natural resource areas to be preserved; (2) an accessible open space system including walkways, bicycle ways, and park areas; and (3) development units having common usage and/or qualities, which should be treated as distinctive, but closely interrelated, visual entities. To reinforce the physical quality of these three components, the Form and Appearance Map €~i;fUit-?-, ~ja~--;+«-_ Exhibit 10, identifies t me~~;at-„aye-E,~r_ .,~~s~,rale~k~es ~tt~w%sar~~~~an~i6,~, .,;i: -;,e~=~ ..r: `u~~-!~~ ~:-major gateways and views. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-42 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 87 Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-43 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 88 3. Bayfront Gateway Objective/Policies Certain points of access to the Bayfront will, by use, become major entrances to the different parts of the area. A significant portion of the visitors' and users' visual impressions are influenced by conditions at these locations. Hence, special consideration should be given to roadway design, including signage and lighting, landscaping, and the siting and design of adjoining structures. These special gateway locations are shown on the Form and Appearance Map, r ~ ~ -r- .- ~ Exhibit 10. 9b}eet+ve~T-1-AAaxiraizeihe-sense.^',,,~~,t,.,,^~-arad_ir3wtatiele~ay#r©ai via~z~'.^et-er3try- Pel+cy->37~-A. ".€~'~eei €s«ir~_f+om~ast-J-S-__pf_~~y-ot..ire^°~~^fh sides-0f tWariaa eel-~e-ebssa+e-view IFS7(~lEdl2te-k7Rd66ape-9f-tt1~5tKe2t-aAd-d9wn-- h~....~! 4.,,. ....1 ~h^ !or' Thn cfroM ~,-z~,,.arR., .~::a.`~s-e ge-r~~-trees shall-be c;~~!~ely-spaced grad- spae+ng-shah-be-sel~ ! ~'~^r" ~'°° ;^_d i iews y ~_n,~, ..,ham, h^ ,-~f,,a ..a senseef-enkyereated~y-ihesEreet-treeaade~cisl+agbdildiasse#tkaerestaa+aater+'h^ °^ 'h ° ~'~ 5eutlabound 1-0-9f#-+amp-t~€-"~Er2etlday-l~euleva+~-Fvsirxai#aFac^~o o` o•,r:; ~hal~be6reated-2s-IJais entry, _ F1-saar~y-ot~rees-shal#-be previdedalong rd-te-ssreen~tae-pewer ~+ -1 _{~tpe °~cfree2-Mar+aa-Ra+kway inkersec~ioa~,--the-intersestien..akaetiid-be ~h-landssapiag~ignag~-~av+ag; -and-c#Faer feaf+ares-w~iish-avill-ideakty # as a farad-vehi '-~free~a-~arkvr:~Y~l~ay--~sulevarr#-iaterses4+s - ^^'' ^.,,, Bc+uleuard-Noe-~enfirarlatle+~ef~kaeE-Neesaad- ~ Ee-~~}ew-serrid©r-{p~tae-may-, #a+aaed-by--baildiags©neither--side~Marina-ParkwaySpesia~attentiea-aNl+~e-rewaired-taensr+ra_tlaaY adecµ+atc~k++itdirag-setbacks-aa~siting~;riteria-vwll--lesate kt~+ldings-te~rame-a{ad-n©i-black-the l©ng garage-wive-tc>{he-water Pe! ~ ^,,~° --~Mariaa-parkway/T+delands-,4veer:zsiiea---._~o-~west--af-the-AAariaa ParkwaylTidelaads Avenue-tnterseetior+ views-will-Opera--up-t~~be~iay:--park ~~~' ^,a~,nd5-~kae resideniiat~rea-+3n-Ilae-ne##amide-©#~Aar+na-Rarkway-rraadES-th lwrat-ara~ taelg direst-views-lewardsil~- open spaF,es-street trees-and~ng aleragJlae-parkway-aviU alsc3-direct arad-frame views-. Pro{iey~T-,1:D-~+eweto Never-Penf-{wildlife refuge}. -The abeve~ieseribed-views skaould-be #cailewed by paneramie~iews-asress park-aad-open ° !^ ~~^^°• o~,.^,d-.-6urap©wder-P-Dint-aad-Sao E3ieg© Bay-- Majer-massi+ag-afNess-skaalJ-be- au©ided~leaag~lnis-porti©r+a€-the staoretirae-Te-pr©tee!-the view- Objective GT 1 Gateways plans shall be established at major access points to the Bavfront area. These gateways shall enhance the sense of arrival and invitation to the Bavfront through the use of prominent landscaping and signage. Policy GT 1 A A Gateway shall be established at "E" Street concurrent with development occurring between "C" and "F" Streets. A Gateway shall be established at "H" Street concurrent with development occurring between "G" and "I" Streets. A Gateway shall be established at "J" Street concurrent with development occurring between "I" and "L/Moss" Streets. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-44 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 89 Policy GT.1.8 Intersections should be enhanced with landscapino sionaoe liohtino, pavino, and other features that will identify them as pedestrian and vehicular oateways to the Ba ront. 4. Architectural Edges Objective/Policies The interface of open spaces, such as parks and natural habitats, with developed areas, constitutes functionally and visually critical areas deserving special design attention. Objective AE.1 Design Development to appropriately respond to the functional requirements (e.g., buffer, transition, etc.) of each structure's location within the Bayfront. Policy AE.1.A Structures shall be sited a sufficient distance from natural habitat areas, as indicated in the Environmental Management section to protect the natural setting and prevent interface with wildlife. Policy AE.1.B Structures shall be sited a sufficient distance from the marsh edge or open space edge to ensure unencumbered pedestrian and bicycle access. Policy AE.1.C Structures shall be designed to ensure that the uses that take place in a structure or private space adjoining the structure do not detract from, or prevent appropriate public use of, adjoining public spaces. In turn, the public areas shall be designed and uses regulated in a manner that does not diminish the intended private use of adjoining developed lands. Policy ~€ ~ A AE.1.D Firm edges shall be implemented where there is a readily distinguishable and abrupt change from open space to building mass. Firm edges are shown in the Form and Appearance Map, Exhibit ~10.~age III_ Firm edoes should be applied in T~ese~re areas where a strong visual form, generally linear, is necessary to provide either for a terminus of views, visual distinctions between areas, channeled or controlled views in certain directions, or a sense of entry or arrival. These edges generally would be formed by buildings but also may be achieved through use of earth berms or mass plantings. de4elepaaer}t-TkNS-prevents-#.afsW-seatmst.,~~t." ~ , ~'-~^ ^,c-arti ,a;#e:.s=:;~,a; r^ ,.~~,~ o,~ .a„at;or~m ~,~z;.~,-r,~„~~-a, ~,a..~~+n rT 5. Views Objective/Policies Objective VW.1 Plan and develop the Bayfront to ensure provision of important views to, from, and within the project area. Policy VW.1.A Views should be provided from freeways, major roads, Bayfront perimeter, and high- rise residential developments. Policies regarding each of these categories are provided below. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-45 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 90 Views from the Freeway and Maior Entrv. Development shall provide an attractive view onto the site and establish a visual relationship with San Diego Bay, marshes, and bay-related development. High-rise structures shall be oriented to minimize view obstruction. Views from Roadways within the Site (particularly from Marina Parkway to the marshlands, San Diego Bay, parks, and other bay-related development.) Development and activity. sites shall preserve a sense of proximity to the bay and marshlands. Views from the Perimeters of the Bavfront Outward. This view is primarily a pedestrian-oriented stationary view and more sustainable s;~~~r<e ~'. These views will be experienced from various parts of open space and pathway system locations and will enable persons to renew visual contact at close range with San Diego Bay and marshlands. Some close-range pedestrian views may be blocked to protect sensitive species in the National Wildlife Refuge. Hiah-rise Development Vistas. The limited high-rise development within the 1-"~:~~~«.~!- LCP Planning Area shall maximize the panoramic view opportunities created with increased height. #igh-rise-strusEaces-~a14-~ c'~~'-~.^ '~° g°T.eral Iosationsaadie~ted-or '~Q +I~r°~,~ ~ ~te+~irtimtx:,~~.~bstrustiea. Policy VW.1.8 Public views to the shoreline as well as to other scenic resources from major public viewpoints, as identifed in Exhibit 10 shall be protected. Development that may affect an existing or potential public view shall be designed and sited in a manner so as to preserve or enhance designated view opportunities. Street trees and vegetation shall be chosen and sited so as not to block views upon maturity. Policy VW.1.C The impacts of proposed development on existing public views of scenic resources shall be assessed by the Port or City prior to approval of proposed development or redevelopment to preserve the existing character of the area. Policy VW.1.D Buildings and structures should be sited to provide unobstructed view corridors from the nearest scenic highway or view corridor road. These criteria may be modified when necessary to mitigate other overriding environmental considerations such as protection of habitat or wildlife corridors. Policy VW.1.E Public views of the Bay and access along the waterfront should be provided via a proposed "Baywalk" promenade. This pedestrian path would also connect to the Signature Park, and the pathway system within the Sweetwater District, ultimately linking the two districts and "enabling viewers to experience visual contact at close range with the Bay and marshlands." Policy VW.1.F Fences, walls, and landscaping shall not block major public views of scenic resources or views of other public viewing areas. Policy VW.1.G The entry to the Bayfront from "F" Street shall emphasize the view down "F" Street to the bay as this shall be a major pedestrian access point to the "F&G" Street Marsh. Policy VW.1.H Firm architectural edges shall be used to emphasize various view corridors along "H" Street, "J" Street, and Marina Parkway. Firm edges are identified by an abrupt and Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-46 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 91 usually linear change from building mass to open area. These edges shall help to define an urban environment Policy VW.1.1 The panoramic view of the bay shall be emphasized at the "E" Street gateway. Policy VW.1.J A dense canopy of trees on both sides of the "E" Street Entry from east of I-5 shall be provided to focus views on the immediate landscape westerly along the street toward the water's edge. The street trees shall be closely spaced and in a regular pattern to achieve this objective. However, plant species and spacing shall be selected and designed to protect and enhance public views to the bay. Immediately west of the freeway, future buildings on the north side should be sited and designed to reinforce the sense of entry created by the street trees and existing building mass of the restaurant on the south side. Policy VW.1.K Building setbacks and coordinated signage shall be provided along Marina Parkway (a scenic roadway; City of Chula Vista General Plan). Policy VW.1.L Landscaping shall be planted along Marina Parkway to frame and enhance this scenic corridor, as well as on E Street and Bay Boulevard, adjacent to the project site. Policy VW.1.M Views of the Bay from the F Street and E Street corridors shall be preserved and views of the Bay would be created from the H Street corridor. Objective VW.2 Locate buildings in a manner that enhances views. The following view types have been identified. • Panoramic views- Typically views in the far distance (bay views). • Framed views- Views between landscape elements, natural forms, or architectural elements; usually characterized as a view corridors. • Axial Views- Views on axis sometimes with a focal element, usually architectural and vertically oriented. Objective VW.3 Locate buildings in a manner which enhances views and minimizes impacts to adjacent wildlife habitat area. Policy VW.3.A Views sFrall be locally focused within the urban areas to enhance the sense of arrival at the center of urban activity. Special attention should be given to plazas, architectural elements, plantings, and other landscape features to reinforce the area as a focal point. Policy VW.3.B Panoramic views across park and open space areas to San Diego Bay should be provided. Major massing of trees shall be avoided along this portion of the shoreline to protect the view. Plant species and spacing shall be selected and designed to protect and enhance public views. Objective VW.4 Signs should be sensitively placed throughout the plan area to ensure the protection of the visual resources. Policy VW.4.A Signs shall be designed and located to minimize impacts to visual resources. Signs approved as part of commercial development shall be incorporated into the design of the project and shall be subject to height and width limitations as set forth in Section Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-47 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 92 19.85.005 (Sign Regulations) of the Specific Plan to ensure that signs are visually compatible with surrounding areas and protect scenic views. Policy VW.4.6 Placement of signs other than traffic or public safety signs that obstruct views to the Bay, parks, or other scenic areas from public viewing areas, and scenic roads shall be prohibited. 6. Landscape Character and Function ObjectivelPolicies F~wc Five major landscape components are utilized to establish strong visual continuity in response to various functional needs. T~",ose ars~aadseape ~^~.,.^^ ^g,--Par+~i..~a-RJ~,,~b~^m,^^~"'",e Ssf~€--power-lines, -I~ferraa~-C~r~rv~~$ul3lie-park4aad; -and-F~H~Jant+ng--ea-ma}er ciFSUlati©n-spines~",°~haraESeristiesandrL-prc°°^?°!;~.° °pc~:es-fore a*e~hewn-i+~~able~-~-paga l+l-_. indicated-en-tpe-Ferr~and Appeararu,e-P^^?~.~" "it-~pag~ "~.;_: These are Dense Landscape Planting for screening, Special Planting within the SDG&E ROW, Informal Planting in public parkland, Formal Planting at major entries, and Buffer Zone Planting at areas adjacent to sensitive habitats. The characteristics for the various landscape functions are shown in Table 3-3. Objective LS.1(ltiliae Various landscape design treatments shall be used to improve the aesthetics of the Bayfront, help define land use and circulation patterns, and transition from the urbanized environment to natural open space areas. Policy LS.1.A Lanc4ssaf~-Ssreenir~-Dense plantings of trees and shrubs shall be used in certain locations throughout the Bayfront to serve three purposes: (1) to diminish the visual impact of large existing industrial structures, such as those of Rohr-lr:e Goodrich, the ~aF3?x€ power plant and tc2nsn+issu~n tFwars suoportino structures, and extensive parking and outdoor storage areas; (2) to help define major entry points to the Bayfront and to frame views; and (3) to be used in masses as visual stopping points to limit views and provide natural vertical elements. Table 3-3 Tree-FtantingSshedute Landscape Functions Representative Representative Function Characteristics' Species Locations Dense 40 to 60 feet high h;~l;,lHrs~>-lr Bay Boulevard Landscape Planting Upright form {- - r,,,,lscat~? - ' Evergreen a J -4 Q±~?F iFpQ Special Area 10 to 15 feet high ~~`~'~+~~~~~~~~ SDG&E ROW Planting lueru+~n ~ac{.ir~e--Argil Globular or multi-stem i~•ea,~~1r=+ ta„t++;~a form Evergreen i=at:;n ~. ~ r o 40 to 80 feet high a~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ " ~ CCU Park Pla nt ng - :_k 1~1a~ _~ Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-48 April 2012 Land Use Plan - Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 93 Up-right and open ~Ir~y+; "~""'"" branching to contrast ~'~ ~`-es with dense vertical form Mixed deciduous and evergreen + ~c~~s ni:a:;a Formal Planting 40 to 60 feet high Crown-shaped form ~+"" F 2>rnia:-s#eei u-ye T=Jelaad s-Hror-~ ~.,,.- Marina Parkway "E" Street "F" Street "H" Street "J" Street Buffer Zone Native species Streets adjacent to Planting sensitive habitat Transitional buffer areas3 Notes: 1 Height may be limited in areas adjacent to the National Wildlife Refuge (see Environmental Management). 2 Representative locations are not approved locations. Buffer Zone Planting will override other plantings for areas adjacent to sensitive habitat. 3 Transitional buffer zones between ornamental plantings and sensitive habitats may use native and/or non-invasive naturalized plant species. PolicyLS.1.B D.rL'nn n.^~ o~.,^~;^„ Automobile parking has been recognized by SDG&E as a compatible joint use of their 150-foot-wide ROW that btseets transects the entire Bayfront. The Port Master Plan and CVBMP also designate this ROW as a linear greenbelt. ~^ ^~~'°~ ~^ ~''~^ ^ °~ ^~^ ~ ^~ ^~ ^^~ ^r ~~^ ^ ~ ~ ^^^ To strengthen the ground plane connection between both sides of the ROW and provide an appropriate greenbelt character, an aggressive greenbelt planting program shall be implemented with-park,«y-i+r~u~~e~~?eris-beneath tt?a-{mower-ti+~s within the ROW. SDG&E criteria will only permit planting that can be maintained at no more than 15 feet in height, thereby maintaining sufficient clearance at the lowest point in the power line catenary. Planting in any parking areas provided shall establish a dense ground plane massing of shrubs ~nnd short trees to create a grove effect that screens cars from view. This policy does not apply in Subarea 1: Sweetwater District. Policy LS.1.C J-~faves-A sQre~~.~#arr~al fir. ~s ~.~^^^ iaenl+#ies#~}t#~e-Ferr.~~ad A{~ryearar~c~-Ma{~, €xhit~it ~{gage-Ul-: whicl} i~nt+ty-Nie raaje~puJ311e-parks ir~te..~,^,~ted-fay-ear~t+ntteus-pe~esfr;aa~ue~latron-alertgFiae-8ayfr~r4=`~''~~ +nto-it~H}ter~c~Thaese~reves-sha14-k3e p{aratet~fier+e<:reatie+aa{-uses:- ~heyrovc.s-shall #yest+e~~e~vaid~lesk+ru{~a+;sramiG ~ ~~,~-~:.~.a„a^~~~^,,~ arm-bay Informal planting has been designated for the public park (Parcel Area 1-e). Informal planting shall consist of groves planted with the same species in informal drifts to provide shade for recreational uses. The groves shall be sited to avoid blocking panoramic views to the wetlands and bay. Policy LS.1.D F^-^~°' c'~°°' T'°^ o'^^' ^^ Formal =lraet-,;~ planting has been designated for the major circulation spines of the Bayfront. The planting should be in regularly spaced Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-49 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 94 intervals using species with predictable form characteristics to achieve strong linear avenues that guide views and establish perspective. Polic ~ LS.1.E t~ir+++~um-~~^''°^°^° o^^ ~^m^^`° Landscaping shall be required to be y "--~ ~- provided in conjunction with all private development through the preparation of a landscape plan by a registered landscape architect. Drought-tolerant native or naturalizing plant materials shall be used to the maximum extent s=;,=.~= feasible. Landscape coverage shall include planted areas, decorative paving, and water features. != a ^ ~ a^ , .~ ^~..,n h^ ~co~ ^t,. ^ ~ ^^,~~,.^., .,$ for semmefsial~{+ses p:r~at~ 5 ~~ °; ;gam Policy LS.1.F Invasive plant species (as listed in the California Invasive Plant Inventory list or California Invasive Plant Inventory Database or updates) will not be used in the Chula Vista Bayfront area. Any such invasive plant species that establishes itself within the Chula Vista Bayfront area will be immediately removed to the maximum extent feasible and in a manner adequate to prevent further distribution into Wildlife Habitat Areas. A condition of approval for Coastal Development Permits will require applicants to remove any such invasive plant species that established itself within the Chula Vista Bayfront area. Objective LS.2 Buffer Zone Planting for streetscapes adjacent to sensitive habitats shall consist of native, non-invasive plant species. Buffer Zone Planting for transitional buffer zones between ornamental planting areas and sensitive habitats shall consist of native or naturalized non-invasive plant species. Policy LS.2A Non-native plants will be prohibited adjacent to Wildlife Habitat Areas and will be strongly discouraged and minimized elsewhere where they will provide breeding of undesired scavengers. Policy LS.2B No trees will be planted in the No Touch Buffer Areas or directly adjacent to a National Wildlife Refuge and J Street Marsh areas where there is no Buffer Area. Objective LS.3 Improve the appearance of the current uses and establish a land use designation and development regulations which are consistent with the City's land use planning and regulatory structure. Policy LS.3.A The City shall endeavor to improve the screening and landscaping of the site and shall require such improvements to current City standards with any new use or development permit approed for the site. D. UTILITIES AND AREAWIDE GRADING The utility improvements proposed to serve the Bayfront are interrelated to provide the most cost- effective means for servicing the developable areas. Extension of existing utilities and upgrading in mainline sizes is required for water and sewer. Additionally, electrical service, telephone, and gas services will be provided but are not included on the schematic Utilities Systems Map, Exhibit 811. Grading and drainage concepts incorporated into the street plans to ~ il~ze-ti,~ ~!re~~~- ~,, a~-use the streets with a curb. and gutter svstem as the primary storm water collection system. Building pad grades and generalized design grades for streets are designated to ensure protection from concurrent storm and high tide events and to provide sufficient cover over underground utilities. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-50 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 95 1. Existing Conditions Soils and Geolopv ea nfflnm rd hn .. rrlo n o« ~"},,. ~ TV.'c rl ~tonnc?c 'c rlnM mnn}nl }n cir ~f nri FI'£n ~r~ •~tt T of .,In .. L. n1 TV.n c !hn dM'I'hi ni `nll i'n nf~. nl:nn .L __. _. _ _°rfl'n -.Ln e ~I n n Frlnh nfiln nd. nd ti ti ~r I v~ll h~na FII~ G..1 ... _ . nl n}'n ni }L.n n'I .~ .. rl'f'n V." {\n -. rln LJn Surtace and sub-surface conditions vary throughout the Bayfront. The Bayfront is situated within the western portion of the Peninsular Ranges geomorphic province of southern California. According to published geologic maps and available geologic reports, the Bayfront area is undedain by fill materials, topsoils, bay deposits/alluvium, the Bay Point Formation, and the San Diego Formation. Fill soils underlie several portions of the site and can range in depth from a few feet to on the order of 10 feet in depth. Topsoil is present on undeveloped areas within the Bayfront at depths of roughly 1 to 3 feet. Areas near the western edge of the Bayfront appear to be characterized by bay deposits/alluvium. These Surtace soils are typically underlain by the Bay Point Formation and at depth, by the San Diego Formation. Groundwater within the Bayfront is expected from 2 to 15 feet below existing surface grades. The Bayfront area is subject to settlement hazards attributable to the presence of relatively shallow surficial deposits of soft compressible bay deposits/alluvium, minor to moderate thicknesses of fill Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-51 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 96 soils, and topsoils. The bay deposits/alluvium consist of an organic sandy silt to silty clay that is typically loose and not suitable for structural support. In addition, minor to moderate thicknesses of f II soils are present and, due to the age of the materials, it is considered unlikely that information on the compaction of fill materials is unavailable. Uncompacted fill material that may shift and settle and is not suitable for structural support. Topsoil was also identified on-site and is not considered suitable for support of structural fill, buildings, or other improvements. All of these existing conditions contribute to settlement hazards within the Bayfront and indicate the need for further site-specific geotechnical investigations for proposed developments.. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-52 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 97 Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-53 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 98 The Bayfront area is considered to be a seismically active area, as is much of southern California. The Bayfront is not underlain by any known active or potentially active fault nor is the site located within a State of California Earthquake Fault (Alquist-Priolo) Zone. However, one major fault has been mapped near the Chula Vista coastal zone: the north-northwest-trending Rose Canyon fault. Strands of the Rose Canyon fault have been mapped approximately 0.5 to 2 miles west of the Bayfront. While there is no active fault underlying the Bayfront, segments of the Rose Canyon fault are considered active and the possibility of seismic activity cannot be disregarded in evaluating the safety of critical structures such as power plants, public assembly buildings, etc. The probable effect of renewed activity along the Rose Canyon, or other nearby faults would be moderate to severe ground shaking, with surface rupture in the LCP Planning Area unlikely. The planning implications of these soils and geologic conditions relate to public safety and the economics of development. There is the possibility of soil liquefaction during a severe earthquake. This is of special concern in tideland areas reclaimed by hydraulically-placed fills. The potential for liquefaction and seismically induced settling within the Bayfront is considered to be moderate to high. A detailed evaluation of liquefaction should be made for any future major Bayfront engineering project. Utilitv and Roadway Improvements The northern portion of the Chula Vista Bayfront (north of "F" Street) is primarily vacant at this time. Utilities have been stubbed to the boundaries of the site and a major sewer line passes along the eastern edge of the property. Most of the utility lines are at the edge of a utility district and lack a complete network to provide sewer and water service to initial projects without looping utilities or building off-site improvements. Marina Parkway has been constructed from "J" Street at I-5 westerly and northerly to the north end of ;~~.!,r I.~d:~c-t,ie~ the Goodrich parcel (at the prolongation of "G" Street). The majority of that street, together with the Chula Vista Marina and RV Park, are on '~u~`-~ ~ ~ '~~r' •'~ ~-!~~~ within Port jurisdiction. Existing streets and utility systems provide service to the southern portions and inland parcel of the Bayfront. -= c + .,::! ~. ~!~-r b= The Sweetwater Authority, which obtains water from local reservoirs and purchases from the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA), provides water to the Bayfront area. The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California furnishes water to the SDCWA via aqueducts, including a 69-inch pipeline that Sweetwater Authority taps near the Sweetwater Reservoir 7 miles east of the project area. The Metropolitan Sewerage System of San Diego (Metro System), of which Chula Vista is a member agency, serves the City via a 78-inch-diameter trunk sewer, which lies easterly of the on-site railroad line and drains northerly to the Point Loma Sewage Treatment Plant. FaK~e-improverNent~to-~he cP~}i~;^2,}.syssea~Faay iaE4ude-~~um~-statieaaf~+#heaste "tbe fvlidbayfr©r#- 2. Utility Service ObjectivelPolicies Objective US.1 ~ - ~ .--.. ~ r~- i~~ ::, a :~~" Utilitv lines should be adeouately sized to ensure sufficient capacity for the most intensive uses allowed by this Plan. Policy US.1.A The schematic water, drainage, and sewer systems to serve the proposed development are depicted in Exhibit ' 11, Utility Systems Map. Policy US.1.B The basic water service for the area shall be water mains located in all streets within the Bayfront. Connections to the existing system will occur in "E" StreeU `~- Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-54 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 99 r=,i..~a,, "F" Street/ ?a-~:-~, ,--, "G" Street, "H" Street, "I" Street. "J" Street, and "Moss" Street. Water main sizes will be determined through detailed engineering studies for the proposed new development. Static water pressure within the system shall be maintained to the satisfaction of the Water District and Fire Marshall. A water main in "G" Street connects the lines in Bay Boulevard and Marina Parkway. This pipeline is necessary to maintain a looped system for development of the project. An easement for pipeline operation should be maintained even though the area may be fenced by or conveyed to R~eh+ a+~c - Goodrich. Policy US.1.C Phased development may require off-site pipeline construction, especially in industrial areas, to maintain adequate pressure and fire flows. The major factor in sizing pipelines shall be fire flows, especially commercial or industrial buildings. 3. Areawide Grading Objective/Policies Objective GR.1 Protect existing natural resources from any significant adverse impacts during grading and construction. Policy GR.1.A Special care shall be taken in development proposals adjacent to wetland habitat to avoid or minimize problems of silting and oil or chemical leakage-R-+~ajeF-siltaEiee h~~Trch~l~n h 'If fhn Art'.V L. n. h.nn1 fn n4 n .f-..ten .,I ,Ln~~ir'„ a n,L ..ffn.-_E-0pg±. nf,~,-~,~,nf E11?v210pmeR1--pfejecfz-.r-a:,~.'' -fOK-641--aad ~ho.,,~nni nnL.nn..,onf a.,~.r~ Policy GR.1.B All grading and stockpiling of earthen materialsis;~eka,;;,~'e~h°~ "~n°^~^ ~^^;-~^•a-aad A:1a+c-h ;~ -zxEepF~vk~eLe--prepo~e~ in.,a~~;ro2:~P.,,e~~..,~ t «hn y ^^t° of storm water runoff best management practices (BMPs). (?etet~er ~~al~k~e ~~;E~t-to-stanciar~ =tiF;e Policy GR.1.C All grading shall comply with the environmental protection policies of the Environmental Management section. °^i^r !c !~c t:~.c ~cc!:grc..^~± ~'cc,.^::, ;,, .o.l'n n fhn ~~'.~Ihn..L.n of 9 Policy GR.1.D All development proposals shall demonstrate that proposed improvements are located outside of the 100 year frequency storm flood hazard zone. 4. Utility and Grading Design Objective/Policies Objecfive GD 1-~<=dE?<~;~~~ade~te c~~; site_~,t+;~ ,=rN~,r-:nee srke;~~+PL,~,'^, -~~taa-a~~~ o#a-dev2lepFV}exit-G~c~r+a- An adequate on-site storm drainage system should be provided to preclude development's storm water runoff from draining directly into wetland habitat or San Diego Bav without adequate filtering of sediments and/or pollutants. The import of soil should be minimized to the maximum extent practicable for_the protection of developable areas from flooding during the 100-year design storm. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-55 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 100 Policy GD.1.A Design to accommodate drainage of storm flows shall consider the elevation of highest high tide and require gravity pipe or street flow to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Policy GD.1.B ~.~~=~:- - . > > ~-'- ~-~+.~~ ~ ti:,-~ ~~• ' - ~ ~ _= Drainage in the Chula Vista Bavfront area that drains. directly to sensitive marsh habitat areas requires special design criteria, including filtration of oils and sediments, -r~~-i_+e-rrr.--tu. ~ to reduce problems of silting and oil or chemicals entering wetlands in storm water runoff. Policy GD.1.C Development within the Bayfront shall comply with all applicable regulations and guidelines established by the Environmental Protection Agency as set forth in the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements for storm water discharges and in the Chula Vista Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) Subarea Plan, as required by the City. ~~ ~ , . ,~.» ., al , _ Est ~ zh~~a=~~ --~-r .-- r''v-.~ ~.a of Jar,l>i-~t~-~ n~ecs ,.41 '.i r -•_6^;.8, r q p~. ~r_J-1 +~d3f1~£-Sn+4 -,i ,. ... P©lic;y-F9~-A Policy GD.1.D Habitable areas shall be located above the 100-year flood level (approximately elevation 10), as required by the City's Floodolain Ordinance and above the highest high tide level ar,d~+~c.~f--r>;yr ~ghti L- -wrd. Sufficient cover to prevent flooding of underground utility systems during concurrent storm and high-tide events shall also be provided. Excavation of underground parking or other subterranean structures shall provide fill material for other components of the project. Any additional fill shall be minimized to ?;aai-:e~~ure~l-ie-meet floodino protection requirements. Po4icy~D 2.A Policy GD.1.E Water table elevations shall be carefully considered in the design of all subterranean building components and related features. Final design shall ensure that no permanent de-watering systems are required. Objective GD.2 Utilities serving the bayfront shall be undergrounded. Policy: GD.2.A The City will require undergrounding of utilities on private property and develop a priority based program of utility undergrounding along public ROWs. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 1. Background/Existing Conditions The proposed project site is relatively flat, although a slightly elevated area is located in the Sweetwater District. The surtace elevation of the site ranges between approximately 5 and 25 feet above mean sea level. The Sweetwater District is undeveloped and currently composed primarily of fallow fields. The majority of vegetation is generally ruderal with small areas of disturbed native habitats, including California coastal sage scrub. The Harbor and Otay Districts are generally developed and consist of limited areas designated as jurisdictional waters. Marine and biological resources are abundant in the project area, primarily due to its proximity to San Diego Bay and the estimated 3,940-acre San Diego Bay Natural Wildlife Refuge (SDBNWR) south of Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-56 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 101 the Plan Area. The SDBNWR preserves mudflats, salt marsh, submerged lands, and eelgrass beds that provide a fertile breeding ground for a wide range of species, including many designated threatened and endangered species. The Sweetwater Marsh National Wildlife Refuge, Chula Vista Nature Center, and "F&G" Street Marsh are all components of the larger SDBNWR. The unique ecosystem characteristics of the south San Diego Bay have made the area a resting area on the Pacific Flyway for a wide variety of resident and migratory shorebirds and water fowl, as well as a fertile breeding ground for a range of aquatic and land species. A continuing major objective of the Chula Vista LCP is the preservation, protection, and enhancement of sensitive wetlands and upland wildlife habitat resources in the Bayfront. With the 1988 establishment of the 316-acre National Wildlife Refuge, a substantial portion of this objective was achieved. Virtually all the wetlands and biologically valuable upland resources identified in the 1984 LCP are now incorporated in the National Wildlife Refuge under Federal ownership and management. Now that preservation of these resources is ensured, it is appropriate that the environmental management focus on long-term protection and enhancement. Accordingly, the primary environmental management objective of the Land Use Plan is the ongoing, long-term protection of critical natural habitat areas. In addition, a major secondary objective is the enhancement of natural resources in the Chula Vista Bayfront area, with particular emphasis on the resources in the National Wildlife Refuge. The USFWS refuge lands and other open space areas, including potentially Environmental Sensitive Habitat Areas (ESHAs) are shown in the Environmental Management Map (Exhibit 12). Thus, the Environmental Objectives and Policies focus primarily on protection of natural resources by ensuring that development e' «"^ nn ,+"~„s.^..« is "^.^^ a ~, is planned and implemented in a manner that is compatible with the resources of the Wildlife Refuge. T^~• °~~ `" ° °^~ '"^ ^•^'^•'•• ^' `"^ AAldbay#ren~-Bv implementing the land exchange between the Port and a private entity. future development leaving the greater intensity will be placed farther away from the National Wildlife Refuge and other land owned by the USFWS. Less intensive development will be located near USFWS lands. The lands outside of the LCP Planning Area and closest to the National Wildlife Refuge are governed by the Port Master Plan. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-57 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 102 Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-58 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 103 2. Environmental Management Objective/Policies Objective EM.1 Arevide--feFLong-term protection and enhancement of critical natural habitat areas should be provided by cooperating in a multi jurisdictional planning and implementation plan with adequate safeguards and guarantees. Policy EM.1.A Coordination with the ~^^ ^'^^^ "^'E'^'' °^~ ^ ^'~ ^' Port in the development of plans and programs for areas in the Chula Vista Bayfront shall continue to ensure that environmental management objectives in the Land Use Plan and Port Master Plan can be successfully implemented. Policy EM.1.B Coordination with the U.S. Fish -grad ~Nild!;fe oer:~ce ~~~R',~^.'~~USFWS shall continue for the development of plans and programs adjacent to the National Wildlife Refuge. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-59 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 20] 2-189 Page No. 104 PoNG~-€Ivl.-1-.-f, -k~i^L•'f.~t-°..~`:o:ut{cXt- Tn nr.Vn.l~~ n.f nff..o~...^.t ~r•-~nle~~~_nf 1{.~N ~N"n n.l nV•-.n.•`a..+nn! in-•f nfl n1'.. ^^P ~E--~nn~m nr~L~nc~e~~no4nr~•1'n n.f f,~-•nnnr~ n1 ~L• -•.n.l n.,l _ na _. fn n'1'nl:n of lln~.ilnnmonf u'fh'n !i• E31a ~ffgFl[--vy~ ~~- ~t-~ coa stay l]C'C V yr,~c ~`t . - --__-- .-~~tlc~-'efaE~Eat-ReS{AFaE sensideraf~^ns-~~~^'~-::'„''h~,~-Ehe--,esieratiera--ancf enhanced; a-~ ,and-lest-aaa4ysts- ~_~n nf~s 'gin" ~^- sparse ef$lanfs-etE E ~., nin....,. f ' ...,nhna in n,~ rhn_ n d ---Maaagement-pregram e---Meniter+n~-gre3ram €- -~Aaintenanse }~regFar~ g---Fandigg-arra r men~intenanse h:--foniractual agrn~nnf^^ !-_ _-pwnerskfip~rans4eF-`n~ere~9Prepriate P-feNaratic~- et~his-glar' -wild-invo4ve- pariie+pa4ierrby--tiae-develeper-,--ihe -Gity;- ~e Galiforrtia-~,c3astal~enuniSSic~.-:r., I~crA~c~ na~„`fhn. .____.__ ..._.. nnm of °, _. agencies- Peiicy EM 1,E~8io#ogieal-~esearses-ManagemenE-~?~ar~Additional-profestion- d-eke biro4egisal feseafc,es---in--Ek>e -W+4dl f~,.f ~ ^ha,~l--be-edema-gregaraF+en-and implerne+atation-e€a ~an~ryrehensive-Bielegisal-Researses-Management-Rian-feF tlae ~~E,f 1 C-.'.i DI-• h-•II hn fL.n L,~n^f of -, f~~J~f,~~ r P- regramamendment_ -whisi}spal~be-certified-by ~re~emmissien-prier~e~kte issuance o#-any-c-caa -for-t ~2nF-T#te plan_dvil# address the#ollow+ag-raallers a: --Acsla+teefural-Besegwrements t3:--?~ejestL-ighting-^^~^^ °~~~iremenis e-~ar,~^,...nn non` "n "'.",~ Manageme+~f .Rred2~2r ~anagen~enF f. Madflatand,ninf~nn.a AAenr4enng g. ement h-~ensifue-tionavlenitouag and fvlanagemen2 i. ~Gi~RslII slices --G€-QA-MIiNgatien~vlonitoringf~airemenE R~epariron-ef~his~larr-will-+nve!`.~d-p~,stis+pation~he Develepe~ikie~it~-kiSF&VVS !he-~aGfera _and-atlfe~+e___.__ ..._.. ~_ ._^'. _~_ ._ °=-=c appropriate. 2e4icy €M-9, E_--TJae-a~anagemer~provisien -of--t+re ~~nd-Use- Flan-are indicated~rap4~ieally- on_ it3e E nvironmenta~-Manager~tenl -AAafr-€ ~fil3il~3-~ac~_.11!_.-~k~ey -provide-tcu--sf3eeiGe -prekesiion-and Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-60 April 2012 Land Use Plan Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-61 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 106 seursesiathe-deve{epmenI-area-skaailbe~e-asb}evemin+ma! ze.^ `~.~~hwrafefieetf{eu~rs~a~he Cay -during-?k~e-dr~'-~,,.~~.--- R-~~-P~}.a... ~h~il ~~6" .-I,.,I~, i .,o,T-„owl h„ adversely ef#estec~by sEe~d~aia etitGew To-{froteet-the-E~iu€ogica{ty-r+skk~mudUat-a+~d~eelgr~sin-t ;~~rzas ^' I~°aTberder+ng-ea-tke Na~aal-~A!itd{i€e~etag~a6-Feefeati0R3F~-b92NnE3~r..~ rye;,; flr~.+ ~-0€-4k~Bay-wr+th6tft `_a6F3rEHk31-9fi-Ehe-~$~nrc ...-;,. E~OinHiVSSiEM-: P-eI+E~-€€W-.-~~-1JIIdl3ay#fon!-~iat3ita4-Pf~steraiierl-arld--€FhaFfC.. C ,4 TL,., fnlln,. g-asi+6F~S IH46{Ve-fi1213itat f efdefi-t9--prO V fde~nrt+f}atlon-t6F~f'~@VQ/A~ent--+n7paGtsBl`iRg•-the-~~Hatit~-aFld~-~tF3~1E2~-VattfeS-0t !4'ettaRF~'' Coastal-P rc3gra~esabca+#tal}: Restoratier~-€~Y-llptaad CoRVersien-t©--VUet€ands--As-the-=F-~~~z~'^~'.a^,d-e©aversien-te wetkHad--Slia€1~2b-fiklf~. L,~~r r, r~,. C,.h h f ~ n Rest©rali©r+2nd-€~hancemerit, °,-,nor,-^~~.g°, au-~ "..~~^.T i }---l3pland-conve~sien te-{~ea+de-3z`~asres-~yea~-reaf~l €ra the~asi- I~~ ~e~h' f ~L.. ~fnr _.-.rc L, r ..hnno fL. r~ r .. L.~ ~.~-ages-of-degraded~easenaF ,~.rl^^v-that-w+{I~e K f~ 1 ___I L.h...~1 rte... L. /ri.. ..f In cr O.Q-a6f°~ •~oi crtxc ..lf ^T °Pn}ar~sF~ pr+nkar+4y atenQ-t#e west and-ne#I~-sentra4-rnargias e€-Nae ~istu}g- sa4t-nosh--th ~^^"~'.r^~Ih^-,~C r , ur-~ --..-l=lpland~eaveFSion.. {o-prsv+de--2-:-0~-a~o.~e€-3alt-marsh inuaediateFy-wesE-0#-tvlartna-F?arkwa~ . Ilk°T,ding~-€kre ce~o r ~~il ..,~. „tee, .'eh c~ ~-6` -z,~,~.a~~„~._ €o _-sc3naest .dir~.T ...,.r~,n Diege-Bay- iv.:}..._.-~-add+tion, at-the-..~-D~~-street-€+{{--a{rpro-xima€ely-1~~sres and-at-bun{©wdeF-Rent-abc3uF-~asres-oi fireshwater mar-ski w+ltbesenstfac~ted-hy2xs2v~and- €nha+asenaenFr3fiE~iskngk~aiaital A6~he.`F G'~treet~ii~e~cist+ngtzaJ3itatsh~n h~~.~^haaced-at~hree beaEieo-sas #e/aews; lj ~~°aturesltggradc; A-S-rites-a~degra~fed J~gfa marsh-a{eng-the--east-aaargin- a€--the-' cof~,,~. r~•;aar"h`~Rh,+bit-7 9-Page~IJ-_ { i{~Npgrade ~-~a~;res s€ aaew~ceastal-sage-h.3bitat (~~-aggrade~xisting-severe€y-degraded-coastal sage-ssr~J~ahitat~ kat~.1.ngat-2:4aeaesaleng seleeted-u{.?land-margin-e€'h~'~ r~~-~{+'eei-mite Chula Vista Baytront LCP Amendment III-62 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 107 E-a d In_ 4hn r ..Li of niter to Ihn don ohnll V.n.. L. ~....~..~Q {.~i Ih..~~ 4IIn . ~ +F)I) rnrl fnr f4.n "r1" Clmoh £II /9G .. -.It ..~. .ch\ -+nd thn r n~.~dnr O~n1 !O tine-U/S/ Fish 8 Wildlife Service. Policy EM.1.C Any new development within the Bayfront LCP Planning Area shall comply with all the requirements of the Clean Water Act and NPDES. Policy EM.1.D Sensitive habitats exist in areas not delineated, including, but not limited, to Parcel Area 3-k (Faivre Street) and the "F&G" Street Marsh. All environmental resources shall be analyzed by an environmental professional, and an Environmental Management Plan shall be adopted to protect any sensitive habitats discovered prior to the commencement of any additional development. Environmental resources are depicted on Exhibit 12a Environmental Resources Map. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-63 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 No. 108 Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-64 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 109 Policy €-f.i-~-f,A EM.LE Diking, dredging, or filling of wetland areas consistent with the provisions of this environmental management plan shall be limited to the specific projects related to the creation of new or enhanced wetlands areas. Mitigation for all disturbance of wetland areas shall be provided at a ratio of 4:1 with an approved combination of creation and enhancement and for riparian resources, 3:1 replacement for impacted areas. No other diking, dredging, or filling of wetlands or other wet environmentally sensitive habitat areas shall be permitted without prior Coastal Commission approval through the LCP amendment process. Policy ~M:a-Aa EM.1.F Direct impacts to wetlands from site development and/or infrastructure shall be prohibited. Potential indirect shading impacts from pedestrian/bicycle and roadway crossings to allow for necessary access shall be minimized to the greatest extent feasible. Policy EM.1.G Buffer zones of 100 feet in width shall be maintained around all identified wetland areas with the exception of any wetlands that are adjacent to existing roadways. All buffers shall be as designated above unless the applicant demonstrates that a buffer of lesser width will protect the identified resources, based on site-specific information. Such information shall include, but is not limited to, the type and size of the development, the specific impact, and proposed mitigation (such as planting of vegetation or the construction of fencing), that will also achieve the purposes of the buffer. Policy EM.1.H The siting and orientation of major high-rise buildings shall respect environmental issues. Such buildings shall be set back from the marsh to preclude their shadows from falling on the sensitive wetlands. In addition, they shall have non-reflective surface materials and be of muted colors. +~ohc~-€A4 ~{~~rior-t©~he+scuar+e2©fan~ eoasta4de~~elaame+~+b-{~e+m#sfio~tlae-proposed--PMd~ay#+<>nt d^ ,^'~^^^~~.,,+-a-nrFx~i+?g-+~aeEhaa+s~fa+~e-maua£enai3se:+a~ro~eF+aeat-an~ce+;tiriuec~ e{3eraF+e+~-ot--ikae---NaFere--4rrEeFpati~° E:e+~te~-i+~o+atia~-a-he++efit-assessra=,ei~k distcisE~f-c~4hesae+~-ter+ii r++eFl~~#-r,?-Saad+ag : ~,,~ ~ ^,^~^^,^^~^~ ~ah>le 3 ~;-Resto*atro{u€nhaneen~3t-€eak~,~+~#AsF+c3+zsfc~~1idt~ayf+ent~,rea 3. Natural Resources Management Plan (NRMP): In recognition of the sensitivity of the natural resources and the importance of protection, restoration, management and enforcement in protecting those resources, the Port and City shall prepare a Natural Resources Management Plan (NRMP) for the Chula Vista Bayfront. The NRMP will be designed to achieve the Management Objectives (defined below) for the Wildlife Habitat Areas. The NRMP will be an adaptive management plan, reviewed and amended as necessary by the District and City in coordination with the Wildlife Advisory Group. Objective NR.1: A NRMP will be created and submitted to the Coastal Commission as a condition of this Plan and will meet the management objectives below. Policy NR.1.A Taking into consideration the potential changes in functionality of Wildlife Habitat Areas due to rising sea levels, the NRMP will promote, at a minimum, the following objectives ("Management Objectives') for the Wildlife Habitat Areas: a) Long term protection, conservation, monitoring, and enhancement of: 1) Wetland habitat, with regard to gross acreage as well as ecosystem structure, function, Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-65 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No.2012-189 Page No. 110 and value; 2) Coastal sage and coastal strand vegetation; and 3) Upland natural resources for their inherent ecological values, as well as their roles as buffers to more sensitive adjacent wetlands. b) Upland areas in the Sweetwater and Otay Districts will be adaptively managed to provide additional habitat or protection to create appropriate transitional habitat during periods of high tide and taking into account future sea level rise. c) Preservation of the biological function of all Bayfront habitats serving as avifauna for breeding, wintering, and migratory rest stop uses. d) Protection of nesting, foraging, and rafting wildlife from disturbance. e) Avoidance of actions within the Chula Vista Bayfront area that would adversely impact or degrade of water quality in San Diego Bay or watershed areas or impair efforts of other entities for protection of the watershed. f) Maintenance and improvement of water quality where possible and coordination with other entities charged with watershed protection activities. Policy NR.1.B In addition to the standards described above, the NRMP will include: a) All elements which address natural resource protection in the FEIR Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ("MMRP") including but not limited to those which assign responsibility and timing for implementing mitigation measures consistent with the City's MSCP Subarea Plan; b) Pertinent sections of the MSCP Subarea Plan; c) .References to existing District policies and practices, such as Predator management programs and daily trash collections with public areas and increase service during special events; d) Establishment of design guidelines to address adjacency impacts, such as storm water, landscape design, light and noise and objectives as discussed in this plan. e) Establishment of baseline conditions and management objectives; and. f) Habitat enhancement objectives and priorities. Poilcy NR.1.C The NRMP will be a natural resource adaptive management and monitoring plan initially prepared in consultation with the Wildlife Advisory Group and regularly reviewed and amended in further consultation with the Wildlife Advisory Group. Periodic Review will address, among other things, monitoring of impacts of development as it occurs and monitoring the efficacy of water quality improvement projects (if applicable) and management and restoration actions needed for resource protection, resource threats, management (i.e., sea-level rise, trash, window bird strikes, lighting impacts, bird flushing, water quality, fireworks, human-wildlife interface, education and interpretation programs, public access, involvement, and use plan, management of the human-wildlife interface, wildlife issues related to facilities, trails, roads, overlooks planning, and watershed coordination) and other issues affecting achievement of Management Objectives and related to Adaptive Management Review. Objective NR.2 Funding for the implementation of the NRMP and for the enforcement and implementation measures shall be provided by the Port and City. Policy NR.2.A The Port and City will commit revenues or otherwise provide funding to joint powers authority ("JPA'~ formed pursuant to the California Marks-Roos Act, Articles 1, 2, 3 and 4 of Chapter 5 of Division 7 of Title 1 of the California Government Code. Policy NR.2.B The Port and City will ensure the Joint Powers Authority (JPA) is specifically charged to treat the financial requirements described in this policy as priority expenditures that must be assured as project-related revenues are identified and impacts initiated. The Port and City expressly acknowledge the funding commitments contemplated herein Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-66 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 111 will include, but not be limited to, funding for personnel and overhead or contractor(s)/consultant(s) to implement and ensure the following functions and activities: a) On-site management and enforcement for parks and Wildlife Habitat Areas as necessary to enforce restrictions on human and Predator access regarding Wildlife Habitat Areas; b) Enforcement of mitigation measures including, but not limited to, trash collection, noise restrictions, removal of invasive plants, habitat restoration, and park use restrictions; c) Coordination, development, implementation and evaluation of effectiveness of education and mitigation programs, including implementation of NRMP; d) Evaluation of effectiveness of bird strike mitigation and design measures; e) Water quality protections; and f) Coordination of injured animal rehabilitation activities. Policy NR.2.C The initial unit sale contribution shall be directed to the JPA and placed into the community benefits fund that will be non-wasting, with interest revenues committed to the specific broad categories of: Natural Resources; Affordable Housing; Sustainability/Livability; and Community Impacts and Culture. The community benefits fund revenues shall be spent within the Chula Vista Bayfront and Western Chula Vista, subject to applicable law. Policy NR.2.D A Bayfront Community Benefits Foundation (CBF) shall be established as anon-profit foundation. The purpose of the CBF will be to gather funds, as both endowments and operating funds, from development activity contributions within the Chula Vista Bayfront, public and private grants and gifts, and other funds as may become available; and, to distribute funds to specific public benefit projects and activities within the Chula Vista Bayfront and western Chula Vista as determined by the CBF Board of Directors within each of the following categories of activities: • Natural Resources • Affordable Housing • Sustainability /Livability • Community Impacts & Culture Policy NR.2.E Additional-funding shall be secured in an independent community foundation from the following sources: • To support and endow the CBF, the residential developer will obligate residential homebuyers within H13 and H-14 parcels to contribute'/, of 1 % of the net sale proceeds (including any loan repayments) to be distributed to such homeowner from the subsequent resale of any residential unit sold within 7-years from the date of the initial Pacifica sale of that unit other than residential units designated as affordable. • Developer of hotel and commercial on H-15 will contribute $2,000.00 far each hotel room developed on the H-15, with such contributions to the CBF to be made in five (5) equal annual payments commencing on the first annual anniversary date of the opening of any such hotel. Objective NR.3 Potential sea level rise impacts due to climate change shall be considered when developing the NRMP. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-67 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 112 Policy NR.3.A Development shall consider the potential changes in functionality of Wildlife Habitat Area due to rising sea levels and coordinate management with the Port and City Climate Mitigation and Adaptation Plans. Policy NR.3.B Upland areas in the Sweetwater and Otay Districts will be adaptively managed to provide additional habitat or protection to create appropriate transitional habitat during periods of high tide and taking into account future sea level rise. Objective NR.4 Designate appropriate buffer areas and protective barriers between developed area and wildlife areas. Policy NR.4.A Designate "No Touch" Buffer Areas as defined and described in Exhibit 12. Such areas will contain fencing designed specifically to limit the movement of domesticated, feral, and nuisance predators (e.g. dogs, cats, skunks, opossums and other small terrestrial animals [collectively, "Predators"]) and humans between developed park and No Touch Buffer Areas and Wildlife Habitat Areas. The fence will be a minimum 6-foot high, black vinyl chain link fence or other suitable barrier (built to the specifications described in the FEIR). Fence design may include appropriate locked access points for maintenance and other necessary functions. Installation of the fence will include land contouring to minimize visual impacts of the fence. Policy NR.4.8 Prohibit active recreation, construction of any road (whether paved or not), within No Touch Buffer Areas and "Transition Buffer Areas' with the exception of existing or necessary access points for required maintenance. Policy NR.4.C Protect the No Touch Buffer Areas from the impacts of the Chula Vista Bayfront project including, without limitation, fencing necessary to protect the Sweetwater Marsh and the Sweetwater parcel tidal flats Policy NR.4.D Include additional controls and strategies restricting movement of humans and Predators into sensitive areas beyond the boundaries of the designated Buffer Areas. Policy NR.4.E Require the Recreational Vehicle Park to install fencing or other barriers sufficient to prevent passage of predators and humans into sensitive adjacent habitat. Policy NR.4.F Require all dogs to be leashed in all areas of the Chula Vista Bayfront at all times except in any designated and controlled off-leash areas. Policy NR.4.G Impose and enforce restrictions on all residential development to keep cats and dogs indoors or on leashes at all times. Residential developments will be required to provide education to owners and/or renters regarding the rules and restrictions regarding the keeping of pets. Policy NR.4.H Habitat buffers shall include a 400-foot combined buffer in the Sweetwater District. Objective NR 5 Design lighting such that it minimizes negative impacts on wildlife Policy NR.5.A All roadways will be designed, and where necessary edges bermed, to ensure penetration of automobile lights in the Wildlife Habitat Areas will be minimized subject to applicable City and Port roadway design standards. Policy NR.5.B Explicit lighting requirements to minimize impacts to Wildlife Habitat Areas will be devised and implemented for all Bayfront uses including commercial, residential, municipal, streets, recreational, and parking lots. Beacon and exterior flood lights are Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-68 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 113 prohibited where they would impact a Wildlife Habitat Area and use of this lighting should be minimized throughout the project. Policy NR.5.C All street and walkway lighting should be shielded to minimize sky glow. Policy NR.S.D To the maximum extent feasible, all external lighting will be designed to minimize any impact on Wildlife Habitat Areas, and operations and maintenance will be devised to ensure appropriate long-term education and control of light impacts. To the maximum extent feasible, ambient light impacts to the Sweetwater or J Street Marshes will be minimized. Policy NR.5.E Sweetwater and Otay District parks will open and close in accordance with District Park Regulations. Policy NR.5.F Laser light shows will be prohibited. Policy NR.S.G Construction lighting will be controlled to minimize Wildlife Habitat Areas impacts Policy NR.5.H In Sweetwater and Otay District parks, lighting will be limited to that which is necessary for security purposes. Security lighting will be strictly limited to that required by applicable law enforcement. All lighting proposed for the Sweetwater and Otay District parks and the shoreline promenade will be placed only where needed for human safety. Lights will be placed on low-standing bollards, shielded, and flat bottomed, so the illumination is directed downward onto the walkway and does not scatter. Lighting that emits only aloes-range yellow light will be used to minimize ecological disruption. No night lighting for active sports facilities will be allowed. Objective NR.6 Limit noise impacts on wildlife Policy NR.6.A Construction noise shall be controlled to minimize impact to Wildlife Habitat Areas. Policy NR.6.B A maximum of three (3) fireworks events per year can be held, all outside of Least Tern nesting season except 4th of July, which may be allowed if in full regulatory compliance and if the nesting colonies are monitored during the event and any impacts reported to the South Bay Wildlife Advisory Group so they can be addressed. All shows must comply with all applicable water quality and species protection regulations. All shows must be consistent with policies, goals, and objectives in NRMP. - _ Objective: NR.7Develop and implement an environmental education program to educate residents, visitors, tenants and workers about the natural condition of the Bay, the ecological importance of the Chula Vista Bayfront area and the public's role in the restoration and protection of wildlife resources of the Bay. Policy NR.7.A The program must continue for the duration of the Chula Vista Bayfront project and must target both residential and commercial uses as well as park visitors. Policy NR.7.B The environmental education program will include educational signage, regular seminars and interpretive walks on the natural history and resources of the area, regular stewardship events for volunteers (shoreline and beach cleanups, exotic plant removal, etc.). Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-69 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 114 Policy NR.7.C The environmental education program will include adequate annual funding for personnel or contractor/consultant and overhead to ensure implementation of the following functions and activities in collaboration with the Chula Vista Nature Center or USFWS: • Coordination of volunteer programs and events; • Coordination of Interpretive and educational programs; • Coordination of tenant, resident and visitor educational programs; • Docent educational; and Enhancements and restoration events. Objective NR 8 Implement design and maintenance strategies for predator management control Policy NR.8.A Walkways, paths, and overlooks near Wildlife Habitat Areas outside of the No Touch Buffer Areas will be designed in accordance with the following: • Alignment, design, and general construction plans of walkways and overlooks will be developed to minimize potential impacts to Wildlife Habitat Areas. • Path routes will be sited with appropriate setbacks from Wildlife Habitat Areas. • Paths running parallel to shore or marsh areas that will cause or contribute to bird flushing will be minimized throughout the Chula Vista Bayfront. • Walkways and overlooks will be designed to minimize and eliminate, where possible, perching opportunities for raptors and shelter for skunks, opossums or other Predators. • Walkways and overlooks that approach sensitive areas must be blinded, raised, or otherwise screened so that birds are not flushed or frightened. In general, walkway and overlook designs will minimize visual impacts on the Wildlife Habitat Areas of people on the walkways. Policy NR.8.6 The NRMP will include provisions designed to manage Predator impacts on Wildlife Habitat Areas which will include and comply with the following: Year-round, funded Predator management will be implemented for the life of the Chula Vista Bayfront project with clearly delineated roles and responsibilities for the District, City and Resource Agencies. The primary objective of such provisions will be to adequately protect terns, rails, plovers, shorebirds, over- wintering species, and other species of high management priority as determined by the Resource Agencies. • Predator management will include regular foot patrols and utilize tracking techniques to find and remove domestic or feral animals. Predator attraction and trash management shall be addressed for all areas of the Chula Vista Bayfront project by identifying clear management measures and restrictions. Examples of the foregoing include design of trash containers, including those in park areas and commercial dumpsters, to be covered and self- closing at all times, design of containment systems to prevent access by sea gulls, rats, crows, pigeons, skunks, opossums, raccoons, and similar animals and adequate and frequent servicing of trash receptacles. All buildings, signage, walkways, overlooks, light standards, roofs, balconies, ledges, and other structures that could provide line of sight views of Wildlife Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-70 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 115 Habitat Areas will be designed in a manner to discourage their use as raptor perches or nests. Objective NR.9 Implement measures to limit urban runoff from development into wildlife areas. Policy NR.9.A Vegetation-based storm water treatment facilities, such as natural berms, swales, and detention areas are appropriate uses for Buffer Areas so long as they are designed using native plant species and serve dual functions as habitat areas. Provisions for access for non-destructive maintenance and removal of litter and excess sediment will be integrated into these facilities. In areas that provide for the natural treatment of runoff, cattails, bulrush, mulefat, willow, and the like are permissible. Policy NR.9.B Storm water and non-point source urban runoff into Wildlife Habitat Areas must be monitored and managed so as to prevent unwanted ecotype conversion or weed invasion. A plan to address the occurrence of any erosion or type conversion will be developed and implemented, if necessary. Monitoring will include an assessment of stream bed scouring and habitat degradation, sediment accumulation, shoreline erosion and stream bed widening, loss of aquatic species, and decreased base flow. Policy NR.9.C The use of persistent pesticides or fertilizers in landscaping that drains into Wildlife Habitat Areas is prohibited. Policy NR.9.D Integrated Pest Management must be used in all outdoor, public, buffer, habitat, and park areas. Policy NR.9.E Fine trash filters are required for all storm drain pipes that discharge toward Wildlife Habitat Areas. Policy NR.9.G In order to ensure that sensitive resources are protected from adjacent development, fencing shall be required for the 100-foot buffer on the north side of parcel 1-a prior to any physical alterations of the site. In addition, at the time project specific development is proposed on parcels 1-a shading impacts, appropriate setbacks, step backs, and/or height reductions, will be analyzed as part of the necessary subsequent environmental review for those projects. Objective NR.10 Form a South Bav Wildlife Advisorv Group to advise the Port District and Citv on the creation and implementation of the NRMP. restoration plans and manaoement issues. Policy NR.10.A A South Bay Wildlife Advisory Group ("Wildlife Advisory Group') will be formed to advise the District and City in the creation of the NRMP, cooperative management agreements, Adaptive Management Review and any related wildlife management and restoration plans or prioritizations. The Wildlife Advisory Group will also address management issues and options for resolution. The Wildlife Advisory Group will initiate and support funding requests to the District and City, identify priorities for use of these funds and engage in partnering, education, and volunteerism to support the development of the Chula Vista Bayfront in a manner that effectively protects and enhances the fish, wildlife, and habitats of the area and educates and engages the public. The Wildlife Advisory Group will meet as needed, but at a minimum of every six (6) months for the f rst ten (10) years and annually thereafter. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-71 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 116 Policy NR.10.B The Wildlife Advisory Group will meet to: (i) determine the effectiveness of the NRMP in achieving the Management Objectives; (ii) identify any changes or adjustments to the NRMP required to better achieve the Management Objectives; (iii) identify any changes or adjustments to the NRMP required to respond to changes in the man- made and natural environments that are affecting or, with the passage of time may affect, the effectiveness of the NRMP in achieving the Management Objectives; and (iv) review priorities relative to available funding. At its periodic meetings, the Wildlife Advisory Group may also consider and make recommendations regarding (a) implementation of the NRMP as needed, (b) Adaptive Management Review and (c) NRMP Amendments. Policy NR.10.C The Wildlife Advisory Group will advise the JPA on expenditure of the Community Benefits Fund consistent with this plan subject to applicable law. Written recommendations from the Wildlife Advisory Group will be forwarded to the District and City for consideration on key decisions as the build-out of the Chula Vista Bayfront project occurs. Objective NR 11 Prior to issuance of anv building permits building plans shall be reviewed by a qualified biolooist retained by the developer and approved by the Port or the Citv to verifv that the proposed buildino has incorporated specific desion features to avoid or to reduce the potential for bird strikes. Policy NR.11.A The following lighting design guidelines shall be followed in order to prevent bird strikes: No solid red or pulsating red lights shall be installed on or near the building unless required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Where lighting must be used for safety reasons (FAA 2000 Advisory Circular), minimum intensity, maximum off-phased (3 seconds between flashes) white strobes shall be used. No solid spot lights or intense bright lights shall be used during bird migration periods in the spring (from March to May) and Fall (from August to October). All event lighting shall be directed downward and shielded, unless such directed and shielded minimized light spills beyond the area for which illumination is required. Exterior lighting shall be limited to that which is necessary and appropriate to ensure general public safety and way finding, including signage for building identification and way finding. Exterior lighting shall be directed downward and shielded to prevent upward lighting and to minimize light spill beyond the area for which illumination is required. • Office space, residential units, and hotel rooms shall be equipped with motion sensors, timers, or other lighting control systems to ensure that lighting is extinguished when the space is unoccupied. • Office space, residential units, and hotel rooms shall be equipped with blinds, drapes, or other window coverings that may be closed to minimize the effects of interior night lighting. Policy NR.11.B The following guidelines should be followed when designing glass and reflective surfaces in the Bayfront Development. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-72 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 117 • Use of reflective coatings on any glass surface is prohibited. • Buildings shall incorporate measures to the satisfaction of the Port or the City to indicate to birds that the glass surface is solid by creating visual markers and muting reflection. • Project design standards will encourage window stencilling and angling. These measures may include but are not limited to the following: i. Glass surfaces which are non-reflective ii. Glass surfaces which are tilted at a downward angle iii. Glass surfaces which use fritted or patterned glass iv. Glass surtaces which use vertical or horizontal mullions or other fenestration patterns v. Glass surfaces which are fitted with screening, decorative grills, or louvers vi. Glass surtaces which use awnings, overhangs, bris sole, or other exterior sun-shading devices vii. Glass surfaces which use external films or coatings perceivable by birds viii. Artwork, drapery, banners, and wall coverings that counter the reflection of glass surtaces or block "see through" pathways. Policy NR.11.C Buildings heights, massing and set-backs shall be designed to minimize bird strikes. • Structure design will include secondary and tertiary setbacks and, to the maximum extent possible, stepped back building design, protruding balconies, recessed windows, and mullioned glazing systems, shall be incorporated to the extent feasible. Balconies and other elements will step back from the water's edge. • Design features that increase the potential for bird strikes, such as walkways constructed of clear glass and "see through" pathways through lobbies, rooms and corridors, shall be avoided to the extent feasible. • Buildingsshall be sited and designed to minimize glass and windows facing Wildlife Habitat Areas to the maximum extent possible. • Parcels containing surface parking, such as those depicted for the Sweetwater District, will be designed with parking lots located nearer to the Wildlife Habitat Areas. Site plans on parcels adjacent to Wildlife Habitat Areas will maximize distance between structures and such areas. Policy NR.11.D Landscaping shall be designed to minimize bird strikes on surrounding buildings. • Exterior trees and landscaping shall be located and glass surfaces shall incorporate measures so that exterior trees and landscaping are not reflected on building surfaces. • In small exterior courtyards and recessed areas, the building's edge shall be clearly defined with opaque materials and non-reflective glass. • Interior plants shall be located a minimum of 10 feet away from glass surfaces to avoid or reduce the potential for attracting birds. Policy NR.11.E Owners and operators of buildings will conduct ongoing public education programs to ensure that bird-strike avoidance policies are followed by building users. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-73 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 118 The owner or operator of each building shall implement an ongoing procedure to the satisfaction of the Port or the City to encourage tenants, residents, and guests to close their blinds, drapes, or other window coverings to reduce or avoid the potential for bird strikes. The owner or operator of each building shall enroll in the Fatal Light Awareness Program's "Bird-Friendly Building Program" and shall implement ongoing tenant, resident, and guest education strategies, to the satisfaction of the Port or the City, to reduce or avoid the potential for bird strikes, such as elevator and lobby signage and educational displays, a-mail alerts and other bulletins during spring and fall migratory seasons, and other activities designed to enlist cooperation in reducing bird collisions with the building. Policy NR.11.F Project applicants shall develop a bird strike monitoring program for their proposed projects. For Phase I projects, the project applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to design a protocol and schedule, in consultation with the U.S. Department of Fish and Wildlife and subject to the approval of the Port or City, as appropriate depending on jurisdiction, to monitor bird strikes which may occur during the first 12 months after the completion of construction. Within 60 days after completion of the monitoring period, the qualified biologist shall submit a written report to the Port or the City, which shall state the biologist's findings and recommendations regarding any bird strikes that occurred. Based on the findings of those reports, the Port or the City, as appropriate depending on jurisdiction, in coordination with the U.S. Department of Fish and Wildlife, will evaluate whether further action is required, which may include further monitoring. Policy NR.11.G Bird strikes must be monitored and measures developed to address persistent problem areas in accordance with the Natural Resources Management Plan (NRMP). Nighttime lighting in tower buildings must be addressed and evaluated through adaptive management such that impacts on birds are avoided or minimized. Minimization of impacts of buildings on birds and the Wildlife Habitat Areas will be a priority in the selection of window coverings, glass color, other exterior materials, and design of exterior lighting and lighting of signs. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-74 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 119 TABLE 3~ SUMMARY OF RESTORATION/EN[L4hrCEMENT FEATURES AND ACTIONS FOR MIDBAYFRONT AREA . ELETED 1) water Marsh ~,5. 2) Sa arsh'iexpansion) 2.3 3} Salt sh (extension) 2.0 4} Salt t: at "D" Street Fill 15.0 5) Fresh Marsh on Gunpowder Point 2.0 6) Salt F1ar t Say Margin 3.0 Un1And 7) Coas tal Sage Sc - a) Perimeter sc ing ~ Z,p b) berm Habitat Enhan c~m=nt inp4rade) Wetland 8) Selt Marsh (high) 0.5 Upland 9) Coas L'al Sa crub 0.5 10) Desi g Basin 11) Imp d Tidal Flushing - ( _4B inch diame*_er culverts) Access Control ` Visual Screening 14) Bridge structure to provide underpass £or Fauna 15) New Coastal sage scrub/succulent scrub habitat . in primary buffer zone. i3 .5 :: For looxtion and aupplxmental infera,ation regarding •F-G" £ercet Nar"F reetoraticn, sea p x.)e ZII-~ . Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment III-75 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 120 IV. SUBAREA DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES In addition to the areawide objectives and plan provisions, this Land Use Plan provides site-specific development and design provisions that are unique to each of the -- -three individual subareas within the local coastal zone. A summary of the subareas and land uses identified within each subarea is provided in Table 4-1. A- _~harea-7-AA,dbay#ror# In-this-sestbn-..--0bjestivesaad-fio#isesare-arrangedunder-hhe ~~.~'~„e-issNe-saferLa..~b'se #r•kegsiFy--..F;u6tt#alierti-aat~R+ib4tia n °~, ..i ° .+ n i i,~r,~,. .,,a n.o^,. ~,a E~+ading, arui-€~vJr-0naaental-~vlar~agemen#-d+ssussed-i+~-the-Areawvde-Shapr^. ^s ,~" -~~„~ ~ ^^''.>=Lse-Wary To-~arkher- fiesus-r~r '!~~^:~~ re6E~trements-e€-_ devefopment-areas are-identifed- -Resc~6ore -&esidentia~V~##age:Par4F~ester -Pack Scalar -Gifylkiy hway-~aee~©r These 3eeters are Ic~i~a~ subareas-cyf Subarea- l- and Piave-asbouridaues ihe+ftajer-plar~#reets-The ReserkS©re-is~ieur~dec~t3y~/€ n+ ,h ^"st C~,•~^t{~ageea-srwe) ea-Nie-seutl~-and fvlarina -Parkway. -between- Gur,powde~F-0int-.give-and-the-~D6~€~a4V-:- . s~~..~s ~°-ark-~estor~s lava#ed ~+th-~~ewder-Poia~E3r+v., ~-a,~...• Est-ef-AAarina-Rarkway-the ~ity/#ighway Herter-is lec;ated~rth E3#tMarina Parkway,-east-of the-~~€-R9V>fand-adjacen#Fe-1-~ a_ -__Spesial St+harea-6anditions The-rr~i~lhayfron!-ir~4udes apprc~xima#e#y- a-1>}asreswJiish-is-the Jarges# Pasant parsekis the-Bay#roni ava+lahle-#or-new- devewlepmeat-- a rnajer+n:;.ev-.~~ ^~isiter-erieatec~devel the site, Gampletion-of-Nais-prejest-wife balances-the currer'.~,d~`,rial-€oer+s e#-bayfreat-devebpment: As~lu~s~le larc}esr-t~ew~evelapmeai-area-~he-9eals-ehi~revi+ng-1 #reat-and srt acing an identifia#~le.--attrac;Nue image-#c~r tkte-seastal-area-arid-tlie-G+ty-rxwsi be-achieved-thrash the-Midhay#roni-projec-k--9c~ta-its irnpcutantr©ieand-lhe~snique-sharaeter~f-development-~o-be e-0nstn,eted--a- cramprehensiae -sec- c,# -p©lices--.end-~mplementaYien- measuresare- xectuired--far--the MidbayfrruaL~tabarea- 2:-kancl-Usellntensity ~b}eetives4P-0fises 9bjesEive-Sa-/k-Prevideaawel!}~lannedand-designed, arneru#i~mixed-ase:~istor-er+ealecl develapment~i#htheAAidha~fraatwhiE;f}isfensisten6-wi#J~-itie-fcrn.,a-rf..~~ n~,._#epa~ent-Pfau approved-by-the-Siiy: Palisy- can 7--~Jie C~oaseHtua~9eve!©pineat Paan-#er floe-Midhay#rent~epists generaf #and-usesin ihe~}?atterr+-ind+sateden-the-#=and-~'~°° o~-;e."^~v1a#3-€~~--~additian-+t~ndisatesa-forge p,at~ic>fagaer~aiat3pro~+uafety-Z-1©acresassociaied-wiih~resor# ;ar~:d-adjacer,tliGUSe ~,r,,~ a. ° ^'~~~ag assesiated-withi^° ate.,..^, °I~ievelepr~enl-Three ha#ef~ main ao+ximer,eiatresrea#can foci!hies-retailandXesideatia!-+e.,s-ara-a#°,n #a3rated within the Rsart-~eree---A~arge-area a#publieaad-0pen-space: ~rsadi<,a~^tt©ihe~wifdii#e regruearPandisatedabngihenerihernandwestern-per+rnet°~. °~°~.d~^,::a~ses;-supperrsenunerc~al, and-an+nn-are de{~ie~ed ~~ t!?0.Residentia#-V+I#age/Park-~ec~en-Beve#epruent withi+~t#ie M+dbayfr©nt shall-i~-eeve+a~rlav~~vlaster{plan=~aah+elk+s-saasiska~k~with~he-Sca+~c2pFt+af-Be~ ^'~^m~°.:t-Wanand Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment IV-76 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 121 Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment IV-77 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 122 ne~it~#Ser$atks{2g...F r_-~r.o,.r nn-,«hi_~r^.,,~.,~,~,i;~ ~o &s~~, r, rs,,.i~^..,.~^r,..,~..ll ~,^e^r.l ~l,o~ ~,T. ~„T ergs+stcwt-witkr-die-ap~rAUr~a94 . Rri~aa~#le-EeRE I D n~ v. h-.li ~ r„ "r,..+, ,,.r~ ^ I " hEU+zantaliy-spesifis a ., three-dimensiea-+aFeQraFiea c~# ~er~a}tted~:rtktis afea: Abjective~1-6-AUow~imit„~',~°, ~'^„~'+n is #e-tk~e ~[~ d~ti#r~-F~e#0~2-aAd-W#16h c ___._~._t-..r r~, rh., r...,~~^r "i n^ ,,,I^.,.,, ~.,r Di.,^ Pc~irciy-~ k-ET-1 T-iTC~,cmrrii SDr'a~Dn1N}-Z-~.,~„~h^i#.fesi..,.r~~";r^s~^~.i,':,~''iBPPr~,aa'.,;,^~'~,°~„ri"^as r~~~ Ski3l~~fe~lOwS f2~riaaar-y--~6ae. 9q{j~f-FO-5~i'trGfllfE'S~ Park-~aa:Elpen~ase'©rae-aex{-39~#eei landwardtcem-Rr+raarY-'^^~^ sty " ,,,, v^~+ I .., , sErac~fares ~ermiEted-Fe 9-~ark-pawke, ,T-~^v,st , r~ver&#eet-Eir~sladir~sig+asl,^~.n"..~'..m,~.d~:v~.r ^'~,~,,.•~~••~~~rora-view~e€~he-wetlaad-teihe sa4isfacii©nd-L1SF~uY~-and-Gal+fornia-9eryartmen #eet- 6i-Beae{opraenl-Z-en~ l'r'- ne~08 :..^'~;an~r^~ #r t~ic~+n3 l~{~t}t-tkfRk~~~eet-e%Fi(,E3t-6r{IBR-B#-E#le I,., ,. rh ~.. znn r.,.,r „t rl,., Fls€8W~13et~aciar~~vhere the-heigh#-skralt be~~ #eet~nda-s+ngle~ii~h-r+se kwr^I~~is 229 Feet}as indisald-in-ihe~ildiagkte+ght>-Daa;TE~h;n;'~. $age -- l~a 'lalf-D ! .,., D.n.,.~rf. 1... ~L. -,II he subject-tr> {he_l~irr~iis~leE~ste~en the-Builidraghts-Maf~-€>c~ii-4; gage--- - --: Policy-~t-FS:2 AletwithstandtnQ-the pelisy-ak3eve- i~her+Xenia!-a©nes-fer~Ne-/=-r.~r.^^•~dtarsh-shall he~~t~rikAlledby~2~r©v+sic~nsd~#e-aP~ro-ved 484AeF+x+it-~sD nl va ~a~ Dui -fir ~~-h-^~ ''ef°^'.r>cs Objee~+ve~1-.G-P-reaideadegdaEe-sirr~tlaii -0nxaensarale ~ 'ms's^~dhlicly ertenFed~+ses-witk>tr~ihe-PA_+dhaytr©nl~asltidingdet#~ehisular-reatesand-{3ark+ru,} aad-n©+a-aehisE+lar ae~ess-: Peiiey-~1-G:1-7hefi©Itowiny-pub4+c--streets~shall~e~egaired for-the-deael©pment~4anned-wiNair~ihe Midhay#rtxtF Marina Rarkway shaU~e a dedisafed 4-lane ~4ajeF~tre^r'^~^°, ^#-~s leny'~4-`:;ihin~e AAidt~aykont (&-lane-n}ajerk~elween~ap BealEwardand #first-iaterseetien-west-..7 he-widtk~e€ AAarina-Parkway sh9wa-0F€~hi#~it-t-1-Page --- .•'-~^o~. ^riityef-€@~6:3t+~6hall ,.,r ~~,~-. ~',,.,•.'' beyond that-indicated thereir>: F -Street-(Lagoon-l3rive) shallbe pr©aided-between Bay-Br~ilevardaad~4arina-F~rkwayasa4lane Sc~ltee-ter- 6unpewder-Point-Drive-shall-be-+~aaintair~ed~t>etweer~the Nature-J+~Fer{~retive-Genler~nd-Marina Parkway- Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment IV-78 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 123 f.mn~ ..f n...L.cN ~n/h'n .~In -.fh~ h~li ti mA fn. lho .In...,l., n...., f ~~ /L. ~~Irl'n n hnfL. r-'.tnn1 M..n., n~.rL .. .. V. K... ..e... ~. Yh T~ n.. 1 n~.f L. !' .,fom.nf' irRCrPrc'Tic ...f4.o.n ~h~re~~. hn nrl~n. ~z^ crrf T...ll~cf~~,.n ff -i~$e{h alenQ seHfk} side ^f ~~~" c+.n,.f .. n,~ h: ,a ^o~i-~- Alnn.. ~An: nn D-.rL a u'Ih Tvn., 7 nn V.nfh drln~ f fh f i~~~ Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment IV-79 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 124 i~oliGy-C3:d-Ar~y_ParfroP-Ota-parJsar-rgstrt+e~are-{our-~feeF-ar aJl-be ~,erasit~ereda btiildir+g {ter-°.~'''^^~-pucpases-~.~s.~ ~'. ^~ ~ °''-. '", ^'^~en~pesfal arsk?+testEaralUaadssapieg-irealrru~le-reduce-vistfal-impacts- Above-grade-parktrrg skaa#k-be r;r~sErt3ezed~F perrth3r~eata~aEeriafs-(d^ ^, .~~° ^~^°~ ^,. , ~ ^~et-alkewedk Pc+tiey-t3:4 --Shared-paAFir3g-shal~be y#reat-as prcjviEk~t-+t+-Areawide-Rc~#ic-y PK.3,4: 4- ?~ysir.at ~er+~aad Appeara+~se 9bjestive ~o~~, bje ,uy „igh-gtrallty-acid-w~~~ed+~i reka#ionska+pbeFween-seasi#ive-we#Jar+dsar+dtk+e~x+ilteavir-0amerrF-. r~~~,^^'^~svdhisk~are+mpoRanY-#o achieve -Etas ebjesFiw~ara- -~andssape ~haraster -~ay{r4rrt-6a#eways -Arsh}FesFura4 €dges -Views -Bu i Ic#irig~lac,emeai-~uilF-Frew-Reka#ioastxps -Arshites4ural-~#>arasker P<>Jicy-~1:€.1..--~ ^~,'^,-~{~ing-shalt-k3e+lsed-Fo~sreer~tJnoseeler»enFs-t3#-ihe-exisFirrg-f3uili-eavicr3ns~enF which defrasi frr~~e-irrterrcfed-new+mageof-fhe Midf3ay#real as a dest+r~atiea-resor#~, semprek+easive-Jaadssapiag~laFl-staal€beregt+ir^''~~.^ ^^ ~o+~errF~#1#ie-masr"'~'^^ r~er develop:enta# the-Midbay#ren#. P©4ie-}+~~1:€,2-~,",~ti~^,~&€ RL~Y~~ha##be-fa#Fy-taadssaped-ita a~aaarrer-^~,:.s;steat-w+Fh-iFs useasa ka+€sorrider aac~{~^area P-oFisy-~1-€~-_. Jnfour+al~ckraves~# trees~#-iakl-be-f>#ar~wiFk~ tJae{rublKr{rarksta~rrivide-shade-aad de#inRionaad ider+tit+salierrf©r~Jaese-park~subjeet to-~iew-cr+rrsideratioaisaad-impact°~..,~h° ~rv}ldJife re#uge- P~iey-~1,E4Uvtar~a #?arkway-shall-beidea#died wiiJ~teu~ak~Fr~t,m,nFi+~g~regular-evenly-spaced trees Pekicy-S1-.-E--. Slarrrissapirx~-shallprovide-visual coneestier+s-wh+ch reta#eUhe-skurour>d+nger;vironmea~t #rrkhe Midbay#rc3nF~devefopraent--A#-the-devetopmerN-periraet.,~, ',tea.,^~'s~apiag-shall-pravid~~~n;ng ar}d-riati+ra~sper~-space-~mT :ith a sora43iaatiea e#~an-made arui-rratara~arfiefs 4aseraNatacsess i+~to ser~si#iae-we##arnd areae -7 he kansiliorro#~ar~dssape #raa iFie p,. r.,en'°r-a;zm.T;sto-ihe sore-of the pre}eci si~~ll-~aJ Ja dit#ereai-p4aaEsommuait+es--~laese-planF e-emmun+#iesshallEons}s{-e# sp^~sa~'ec'tid a~srd.^y-iearrigatierrar+d mai„€a.^,m;se regairemerrts, solri~#erm;-a+~d-Fer#ur~~ sr°^'~„^.npaYiblettrerrres- on-tk~ 4raasitien-#r4m ##re-naFivewetkarrds errvirenr~rsnl ie-lbedermal sharasfere# skeetssapesand urban {~la~as: Rolisy~l~~~he4eUewing-shallbe~J~e~efu+it+on©#!he{~laa eoa~muaii+esby-aeNe~u3wr}g-frgm deaek~pn+en#~e-tMe Alatienal-~A4ld4i#e Re#age: "AF~£+ve-P,rea '-~,.,^ .~+ieaaradssape-slaarasier #et~d ~e prejec-t-sere-s#raJFSesus sr '~~'~ g hs~ densifyaefivities-a##orded~y-the-praposed archilesFruallhefae-Many o#the-la+~dssape areas~;haU ronsistof {iae~a#aniirigsir}cori#ainers-orheuaeed-{34anters_-Li+nliedase-ef~t~rfgrass shal4be-peurriited as~.ss~,:° -to Fhe bdikJinq {sums ark to sreafe ia#orn; ^ ~a~^' ~q areas--;?#anF n~a#eria!-shall be naerr~ail#ed-asasceniste4hebta+k~irrr~-#arrnsaradXec~eaFeuvfarrazal~atinq-a+eas- Blarvtnaa#erta{skval! Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment IV-80 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 125 Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment IV-81 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 126 Tr,,,^^,~~ views--ViewsbeEween-IandssaPe~~~^^..T. naFuralfierfas-eFarshites£aral2lements asaalty oriented: Policy-~~-H A--AF#he-'€' Street-c~atewa~a-ter~raiaatier~view-te-a-ve#isat~esal ^^~shalrbs estabNshed between theta#-s€~unf3ewder-Puvea»d-the deve4epnient~-la9eer~ P-<ilicy S1-k+2-_ A-panwamisaaew-0f~he bay-shaltbees+^~~~^~' sihe~au»a Par#rway~ridge ever the-pErbiie-larger+-t5 ik+e-w Pouf,/ S ~k{:3 -RBp©ra+~}6-viewss#-the-bay a»d-tkre "F r_~.c+. T }.mat} s„ ,.~+~ti~ ^+,,,,+ ^,. +h „r "F" ~treet{t- r~A -Pr#ramEdvievw-Ealhe ~„ ^ +^,, ^++~, r" cam.°°r{-L aggo nve}- -bay-Sh6ald'+~~.., ,....., . _.... _ ~ee~+ve~ gateway-F+~-tk~e-AA+dbaytronF Bb)ectWCi c t ice. ~~+~ }~µ~/+ld4Rg5-iR-a~Na+~2Rh adjaf~n t-wi ldlife habi4af-area: Pcnic~r-S~:l~.-t-- Inaddition-tca-fhe wetlands-setback-pol+cya»d-t~t+ilding-herghi-pel~nd-l~se Purr.. the-kaplerae»Fation-~#a» shall-estab4+skr-wilding °^+~.~~~s3rern$ab4ie^.ro-°etsaad-lot-boaadaries toassare-apprepria#e~rNldi»g-p!~=.a:~. Pokey-~3~-~_--Migh-risesesideat+a4 towers~ha#t b^ ^•.,+^~' ,. ib~#eir~er~g~+des~araaYel+ng~he~ajer view corridors #rom '€~tree#lMarina~~rkway ta~he wetlaads Polley~S1:J:~7hat-po#ien e#a residea#ia4-bwkting-Jaoirig-+~n.~:.~,^+~^ads~~,~'~ ``.eve a~etatJengt#i-©i-ne mor^ +~,.,+~n r.,~,.vµ4lapyt_a-separation-9f-at-lea +zl,o ,,..,,.., ~'..,+.,^. ~ _° ++,,, ti is .;,~+~, r+.o .,~.,;o of a banding Jine~asing-the wetla, ,ds~.,~t~realF{minimum 5-ft3ot s#seE}at-IeastEVery~9-feet- Eabjecti ve S 1,~1- ldave a ant#yrng. high ~aality-awtutectaral fharac-ter a»d design to the~+indi»gs c+~ns4rt~eEed-within-fk>e-iVlidhayfre»t- gelic~S,1-fit- _ ..;..^,aT~h~" de-#ellewed i+i- s#ractares-+N+#hin th~€+Aidbaytrorrt Colors-Eoloration of-the IWldbayfro»t-shall be{>erckived as-asingle themati rimpressiorurrade ap-o€ sabtle-var~atiorrs o€ligl~pastel-te»esa€e#f-whites-srea+s>s rt+se ~easl~asaa"ea#h-tees. Sri~~k~t-assent-sc344ors-shal~be•-reserued-~#or-Frin}and--I:r" +„a,.r^ ^., ~., ~v ~: Mater ^.~..s~°teflest+va»~aterials~krall~a©t~e{+sed-3-lee-ace-ef~^"~' ~~°~~bited-~tieet metalS+nish sarlasesshall-be discearaged--The aceo#-stae-ee~weoc~and~onsrete-sball~e erioearaged: Y~{indew~penings-aNindew-openi»gs-or-pa{terns-especially+rr±.,~,~„~.; ;.n. „^d I,;yh r,~'~~''^y, shallev<3id monelonoas-pat{erring: -~n~a##er anitsef glaz+ngand e€aenings~l~all-be#avered-over .T larger: single-paned-0penings--4V+ndew-treatrneats w-bees-ard,ra:Ji.;g tv}res) char corrfarm toThe design~egairements es#ab#+shed an cooperation with-the l~~F,4r1NS Rents-Fir-0o#s~itheat-varied-parapets aFe dissoaraged- Var+aticrF~a roe##e+ms-ar+d-parapet trr~atmentsshaltbe enc~trraged- Toclise-0arageav+an-predaters. roofdesignsshalJ incx>rporatearit+- pen;hing eloments as34+pala#ed~+a~he desiga-rega+remen#s devebped~n eooperatien-w+lh-the t)~Fa»d tok~e-incorporak rt in the-8ielegisal Fiesoarses~Aa»ager~+ertt P#an- Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment IV-82 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 127 ~nrn, c~ 1 ~-o-r>. rn~T r~(~~ Si~~n fn . nh fhn f'rc! hnV.'fn hin In~~nl TV.'n .; 11 n n B.nf~ ~ \ n ~ ~Q"Q'C/ic nr~rt4'nn~ln nlr_n~\ nv-tuv ov""Qa`n".r'~naion i~`n cyan h~l nahi~ thn n'n'nh ~~n aa~_ AnNn n!'n Inlnnnn .J n.~ninnm nn! nL.nll ~~ Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment IV-83 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 128 Peitsy ~l-~-;?-Tk~e~:~` ^gai~d srier~FaFien etmajo;~'~' ^s-:d,.~~ . ~,.f ~n .,n,onf~ -,h-~3ESildir~c~. what!-be~ ~, s ~ ~ ~ •~,• ~~ a ^ s•,••,, s.,ii~n n f~,n serssikive weFFands--laadditioe~k}e.^~~,~~„~~a+-reflesFiue~#aee,...~sn.,~° °n~' k~e-e€awted colors ~-Subarea-2-kRdNSFria~Ar28 1--~pecia4-Subarea-SExsd+Fierks the +s nf,~oro t', f a.~,-rf'~ ex+sFirag-USe a{-itae-Nme llae Shaka-V+sFa-Bay#f., ~:as-..,~-adepFe~-V~lhea ..~.~ __ 69RSFKl~f>Fed-~-a: .J~'I.J'~r'....~..t'°~iSf ~ vc ..~ ..... ...... ... T1'.~ ___ ._ ~nl'r r~f..rl Foren~aia and-limited ex{3aansier++s~eca~iFted~adeF4kte~wvisiease~Fhe ~afld-ldse-~kaa--~n,~„°' landssaping2aesf#aeFieimpreveraerNs;o '; ~^ .,.:~!:^^ ....°I~ ^..._ . ~'°„~~„^n,~^s G desirable- ~-Sabarea~bjest+ves/;?-0lisies AbjesN+~e~?A-Prov+deaestkaeFis impreveraer#s Fe~is£iag and-new ~nduskiak-de,T P©lkcy 82-A: { New ~evelepmer~wiFbia-Fbis-sabarea staakEbe asseaapaaied-by-a-landssape~uasiee p4an ar~d imptemenFaFion-sCk~edrxle-- T#~e 6iEy~ay retire-Floe-landscape plans to ex{end-bey©nd-F#e baundaries-ot the eew-deuelepmenF-where-apprapriate to apgrade-exlsFingareas: S-~pesial~ubarea~oradiNens ~#~e-S9uFhem-passe4,-.;~,aF~~ "~f'~y', o.,d-.,mss;-of,T-o. Fh;s a, ~ 1ti n sh„ rn ~f,i ~., b11F~1S-nE)F~iOVef2d-~-Fl:iE~ay}f©nF ~T vmT. T~`"~.-crnmrcf ~ v(£~x?-GOnFarrrrupprv...,, ~.n.:.",t j On -. T4. r~ ,,,e.Jorn~'R s-a%~~acre~ F,a. , 1hr~rcr~vy.~ .,I~~ (4 aeres; which-is E+sed-a';-{sartd-t#e-calf-werks~nd-ate area-(~7-aexes} wksiskr+sdeveleped~a+f#-J+ghF i+~lusFrkal-ese>r Asc-,erduag~F~~,..r.,}Fi..ga~:~,~ -^',,.^~f~~!ate~y-af~1-Fkse-salF~~m^o,-Via'^~-F-.=''^ calf- wc>rks~vi4l~e-iFlSerporaFed~nF©-a-~kaFe-wildli #e~esewe~ever--a-EwenFy-year-{~eried--Ttjefea+alninQ area-i6desi~l7aFed~ef ,a f. vi n~ n e~ r_~.,~...i}.,na'~ o i i~n,s ~1r,~~. ,.-w.. s~.~.~~-...' " f~,.-.FS use. It+sanFie3pa4ed{}aa{{!~ ~DC~E-faeiliFy-~v+lkremalr; in caperation ona-perraanenF~iasis while~he~akF w©rks-wi4~seaFlnae-i+~Fo the-foreseeable#utere~#e uadusFrial-l ar~d~skocaFedk~eFween-Bay-Boulevard and~5ar~d-deer-net leave aayd}rest-Day~rentage- 2-subarea 4~jest+ve~uliees 9b)e6Fived3-A--&~revide-t Nng-deve4eprsteni-and-!©ng-Fenn c;rirwersion-©C potentlapbabiFal-areas Fe preFested-oper~spas~ Pc~4i<~-S3:R-{ - ~reclade-any-visitor-serving#aci#iiies here ksesause ei Fhe-prexir»ity of-N~e; freeway and Fhe~}enerati•ay~F~^f. kn-addiFion-ne properly-whic~k+ vx~+~ld~enem+sa4ty c©mpeFewith the-BayFront D-Subarea-a-Iralarad-garsek 1 _-SpeoiaESuk3area-6ondikions Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment IV-84 April "LU'I L Land Use Plan Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment IV-85 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 130 1- apeeial Suhaseat~cu~ditiens Tk+eske-+sappr©xi+aately-63-asses-i+f-size:-genes^'t~d~+west t>#8ay~ea ar ~tfeet~,-ai;d-atHF1E~}#t~e-BaSteffl~.L,...., l~n of Cam. FPAr ~ar1+~2E+fN>-0aFE AAA-l~+at~~~f Ey-A W REf62r}d-1t1E-c"1f., a"-9.r:.a.`> cd San-0. -a 986 Thr, f3r9Per#Y~af+Nyiised-fAr-S2lt-evaper8ti9a p9++dS{VVe^«.,.., c-.u r„ ~ ...,,, ., ^ «., f,,. ~.,.,,^ ~«.^.,~ tanks ^~»ted W}tb-asa-adJacef+t- ~on{pany#+reperty-+s"drytand" Tl~e dry ^.,,,Ri,,,.^r°~-at-tki2.,aaEha... ^^a ^f «v.^ ^.,. ,,,.« ^ «„- r. ~~.. _.._, ~~i}aG2f+1 i9~ay-B©kitevafr~aad'~^ ^^..~-~.c' ^^ m^~' Str~al~aflF ~k~lE-af$a- W a~dESi~F1d te~{~pE (HeaVjc~fulaStffal~-ua-8ar~ ~3~e~e's~GP- -~h~a..~T ;+~(}~E;}~{a V+sta~e+aefat-~f the3i12-i&~~k+ta .a i .a r „i~ ~, i ~, « .,a i i o^ i .,, «„a i^a ~«. -,i with-Pseeise~tarrlaith,~^,^a#aafae*atioa. Ts~,.°~st+f+g-uses are-se+~si~°^'~.~:.,~,,r~Fh^°~•~°^~ designations -. ter~t#~e entire sit~pase: ~udafea 9~yestivPSfRg4isies E~tfjective ~7-A ~stablisk~a Ja+~dase-plan a+ad~evelepa+efFt fegulati©as~ef 4hisafea'^~t~fa'n, ii+ftte tk+e-F~ity'slarfduse-plar+aif+c~~^~.d ~~^ latefy~tfu~areir~-a-mannef-w#~-isc-0rtsistef#Fwitla-its deve7c>pmenteapahilityandeauifonm.,r,^~^~ °_ Pr~lisy~7-A-1-Any devel©pment{3rcapesat-wiih+n-thissuharea-shall fequire~e~z+pfekienswe-anatys+s et the e+urea iadetermine~he<}ppu~pfiate~eag-Eefra~anderf+~k~fl-i;~t~e subarea. Pc+liey S7:/+.~-9n-an ~ir}ter+n~-basis-:-lt+a-pity's-I-L~-zei~ing-desigr>ati©n-shall t>e tft+lized-tc3-regulate devek~pnient- --~+basea ~--~aweetwate~tv9arsh i>latie+~al W+ldliteRetage AS This area isewr+edby~he €ederal6o~d isaperated-by~he-l~ S Fishand Wildli#e Service as the~weetwater~Aafsl3 Nati©++al-~PlildUte-Re#age-lt~uniaias~+ft~+aUyal~e#~he~nportaai~+ldli#e WabitaF ar+d-wetlandswithi+~-the-Bay#rent PIanFlsea-.-~euefr~ment-ewaership-assafes-that of+y develepn+er# vvitt~a-the-sudarea~rvill be~,easistent +a+th testiw~~aws-the psimatyassue fer-od~aw.;i-develcspment °'~° '° aueidingof a~isairaiz+++g-irsapasis~e~ wildlife hat~iiaE.- 2- -Buharea-Abjectives/Polise s ©hjestive~B:A dvtaiftitain aaEl enhance wildli#ekiahitat-vvithilatieaal YUitdti#e o.'~-while allewi~~njeyr+aent-e#seastal istenl wµih-k~af~itat-pwfee-tie+~ P-e4isy ~8/l-a-~h2envisen+Nentaa-managefnent pc~lisies °~'^~' -,~°s°''+n-E'~°~,~' ~ ~s° t~7an-wwhish pretee-t-a+u~e+~ane~ the awettar~and~ahifatareas-shall be implerraes~te+Tl©-assnre~t+atany dev~ nad}ae-eniparsels-w+U~ee+vsistert,~.T't„~.~°+~eeds~+l-th^,~a~T#~latlenaJ Wildlite~2e#ug~ Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment IV-86 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 131 Table 4-1 Subarea Zoning Types Subarea Zoning Subarea 1: Sweetwater District Commercial -Visitor (C-V) Commercial -Thoroughfare (C-T) Parks and Recreation (P-R) Open Space (O-S) Industrial -General (I-G) Subarea 2: Harbor District Commercial -Visitor (C-V) Commercial -Professional and Administrative (C-P) Industrial -General (I-G) Industrial -Research and Limited (I-RL) Residential -Mixed Harbor District (R-MH) Public/Quasi -Public (P-O) Open Space (O-S) Subarea 3: Otay District Commercial -Visitor (C-V) Industrial -General (I-G) Industrial -Research and Limited (I-RL) Industrial -Limited (I-L) This subarea component of the Land Use Plan focuses the areawide policies on the unique characteristics and needs of each planning subarea and provides greater policy detail for site-specific development issues, where applicable. Some of the development issues may not have Subarea specific conditions and would therefore be guided by the areawide objectives and policies. The three subareas are addressed below in two sections. The first section is the Special Subarea Conditions and the following section is the Subarea Objective/Policies discussion. The first section provides a general description of existing Subarea conditions. The second section provides basic objectives as well as specific policy provisions used to guide development and resource enhancement within each Subarea of the Chula Vista Bayfront area. Within the three subarea discussions, the objectives and policies consist of the same five issue categories addressed in the Areawide Section (Section III) of the Land Use Plan. The five issue categories are Land Use; Circulation, Public Access, and Parking; Physical Form and Appearance; Utilities and Areawide Grading; and Environmental Management. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment IV-87 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 132 A. SUBAREA 1 - SWEETWATER DISTRICT 1. Special Subarea Conditions Subarea 1, Sweetwater District covers approximately 369 acres of land, plus 39 acres of land covered by the northern inland parcel. The majority of the land within this subarea is owned by the Federal Government and is operated by the USFWS as the Sweetwater Marsh National Wildlife Refuge. USFWS lands include approximately 316 acres of important salt marsh and coastal uplands wildlife habitat within the LCP Planning Area (Sweetwater and F&G Street Marshes). Government ownership ensures that any development under that ownership will be consistent with Federal environmental protection laws. The remainder of the ownerships in this subarea, within the LCP Planning Area, consists of SDG&E, San Diego and Arizona Eastern Railway Company, and Union Pacific Railroad Company easements; a City of Chula Vista parcel; and four parcels located along the eastern edge of the Sweetwater District that are owned by CVAFG LLC, Good Nite Inn Chula Vista Incorporated, EI Torito Restaurants Incorporated, and Bay Boulevard Associates LLC, respectively. Two parcels in the Sweetwater District (inland parcel) are also owned by private entities including Wal Mart and Best Buy, as well as other various industrial owners. The remaining six Sweetwater District parcels were previously owned by a private entity but were transferred to the Port as part of the land exchange, which is addressed in the land exchange parcels discussion under Subarea 2, and as such are governed by the provisions set forth in the Port Master Plan. The primary use of the Sweetwater Subarea parcels within the LCP Planning Area, but outside of the Sweetwater Marsh National Wildlife Refuge, is commercial and industrial (inland parcel), including a small motel, restaurants, an office building Wal Mart, Best Buy and other industrial uses. 2. Subarea ObiectivelPolicies Land Use Objective SA1.LU.1 Implement the land exchange to minimize impact to environmentally sensitive lands from potential development adjacent to the Sweetwater Marsh National Wildlife Refuge and place more intensive development on less environmentally sensitive lands in Subarea 2. Development of parcels under Port jurisdiction in the Sweetwater District is governed by the provisions of the Port Master Plan. Policy- SA1.LU.1.A Development intensity within this area is determined by building heights and site development standards. Development in this area shall be coordinated with the Port and other regulatory agencies. Circulation Public Access and Parking Areawide policies apply. No additional subarea specific policies have been identified. Physical Form and Appearance Objective SA 1 PF 1 Maximize the sense of arrival to the Bavfront via the "E" Street entry and provide clearly identifiable gateways to the Bavfront. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment IV-88 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 133 Policy SA1.PF.1.A Provide a clearly identifiable gateway to the Bayfront at the intersection of Bay Boulevard and "E" Street concurrent with the development occurring between "C" and "F" Streets. Policy SA1.PF.1.B The Bay Boulevard and "E" Street entry shall be a primary northern entry into the Bayfront. This gateway shall provide a memorable image of the Bayfront. Landscape framing and architectural elements flanking the entry must reflect the importance of this entrance. Policy SA1.PF.1.C A canopy of trees shall be provided along both sides of Bay Boulevard at the Southbound I-5 off-ramp to "E" StreeUBay Boulevard. The "E" StreeUBay Boulevard intersection shall be enhanced with landscaping, signage, lighting, paving, and other features, which will identify it as a northern pedestrian, vehicular, and bicycle gateway to the Bayfront. Utilities and Areawide Grading Areawide policies apply. No additional subarea specific policies have been identified. Environmental Manaoement ObjectiveSA1.EM.1Protect, maintain, and enhance wildlife habitat within the Sweetwater Marsh National Wildlife Refuge while allowing public enjoyment of coastal resources. Policy SA1.EM.1 The environmental management policies established in this Land Use Plan, and in the future Natural Resources Management Plan, which protect and enhance the wetlands and habitat areas, shall be implemented to ensure that any development permitted on adjacent parcels will be consistent with the needs of the adjacent National Wildlife Refuge. Park Develooment Objective SA1.P.1 Ensure strong pedestrian access to parks in the Sweetwater Subarea and between these parks and other areas of the bayfront. Policy SA1.P.1.A The concept approval for the Signature Park will include a refined plan to address the linkage between parks over the F and G Street channel. The design will ensure that the linkage between the two areas of the Signature Park is easily accessed, obvious, and allows visitors to flow naturally and safely between the two areas of the park. A pedestrian bridge will be evaluated and, if necessary, a supplemental environmental review will be pertormed to address any necessary issues prior to the concept approval being forwarded to the Board of Port Commissioners. Policy SA1.P.1.B Create a meandering pedestrian trail constructed of natural material that is easily maintained and interwoven throughout the Signature Park. Policy SA1.P.1.C Create, as part of the E Street Extension, a pedestrian pathway/bridge to provide a safe route for pedestrians to walk and to transition from the Sweetwater District to the Harbor Park Shoreline Promenade and park in the Harbor District. Policy SA1.P.1.D Segregate pedestrian and bike trails where feasible. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment IV-89 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 134 Policy SA1.PD.1.E Provide a meandering public trail along the entire length of the Bayfront. Leave unpaved the meandering trail within the Sweetwater Park and adjacent to Buffer Areas Objective SA 1.P.2 Sweetwater District Public Parks should be designed to minimize impacts on adjacent wildlife areas. Policy SA1.P.2.A The parks will be Passive in nature and encourage Passive recreation, be low- impact and contain minimal permanent structures. Structures will be limited to single-story heights and will be limited in function to restrooms, picnic tables, shade structures and overlooks. The term "Passive' will mean that which emphasizes the open-space aspect of a park and which involves a low level of development, including picnic areas and trails. In contrast, active recreation is that which requires intensive development and includes programmable elements that involve cooperative or team activity, including, ball fields and skate parks. Policy SA1.P.2.B The parks will be constructed using low water-use ground cover alternatives where possible. Policy SA1.P.2.C Pedestrian and bike trails will be segregated where feasible. A meandering public trail will be provided along the entire length of the Bayfront. The meandering trail within the Sweetwater Park and adjacent to Buffer Areas will not be paved. Policy SA1.P.2.D The parks will not include athletic field amenities. Policy SA1.P.2.E No unattended food vending will be allowed. Policy SA1.P.2.F The parks will include enforcement signage that prohibits tenants, employees, residents, or visitors from feeding or encouraging feral cat colonies and prevents feral cat drop-off or abandonment of pets; and prohibits leash free areas near buffers. Policy SA1.P.2.G The use of amplified sound equipment will be prohibited Policy SA1.P.2.F Reservations for group events and activities will be prohibited. SUBAREA 2 -HARBOR DISTRICT 1. Special Subarea Conditions Subarea 2, Harbor District generally extends from the north side of "F" Street to the south side of "J" Street and contains approximately 195 acres of land. The primary land use in the Harbor Subarea is the Goodrich industrial and manufacturing facility. This was an existing use at the time the Chula Vista Bayfront LCP was first adopted. When the facilities were constructed, landscaping and building aesthetics were not an issue of concern. This use is anticipated to remain, and limited expansion is permitted under the provisions of this Plan. However, landscaping and other aesthetic improvements for the existing, as well as new development, is desirable. A Fire Station is planned to be built on Pacel 2g in the Harbor District. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment IV-90 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 135 The balance of land within the Harbor Subarea is owned by the USFWS, Foster Properties, Pacific Trust Bank, the City of Chula Vista Redevelopment Agency, the State of California, and a private entity as a result of the land exchange. Land Exchange Parcels The six parcels that transferred from a private entity's control and City jurisdiction to Port ownership and jurisdiction include CVBMP Parcels S-1, S-2, S-3, SP-1, SP-2, and SP-3, which are covered by the provisions of the Port Master Plan. The four parcels that transferred from Port ownership and jurisdiction to a private entity's ownership and City jurisdiction, and are covered by the provisions of this LCP, include CVBMP Parcels H-13, H-14, H-15, and HP-5,. Across-reference of the LCP Planning Area parcel numbers and CVBMP parcel numbers is summarized below in Table 4-2 and shown in Exhibit 13. The parcels involved in the land exchange are shown in Exhibit 5. Table 4-2 Cross-Reference of LCP Planning Area Parcel Numbers and Chula Vista Bayfront Master Plan Parcel Numbers LCP Planning Area Parcel Numbers ', Chula Vista Bayfront Master Plan Parcel Numbers 1-a ' S-4 - - - _ 1 _f - - -'- ----. - - - --- - __ ____ _____ _____ __ - - S-5 2-f H-13, H-14 and HP-5 2-h H-15 SDG&E Easement ' SP-4, SP-6 Railroad Easement SP-5, SP-7 Parcel Area 2-f is located just east of the Chula Vista Marina in Subarea 2 (Exhibit 7). This parcel area covers approximately 23 acres. The existing land use is entirely undeveloped. Proposed development of Parcel Area 2-f consists of mixed residential with a maximum of 1500 units and supporting ancillary retail uses up to 15,000 square feet. Residential buildings range from 4 to 19 stories and a maximum of 220 feet in height. Parcel Area 2-f zoned as R-MH will contain development blocks that will have individual building footprints and towers of varying heights. Off-street parking spaces will be provided for Parcel Area 2-f in accordance with Policy A.PK1 for residences. The required parking will be located in parking structures both below- and above-grade. The above-grade parking structures will be generally located in the center of the residential structures, generally surrounded and enclosed by the residential and ancillary retail uses in order to minimize their visibility. Parcel Area 2-h is located directly east of Parcel Area 2-f in Subarea 2. These two parcel areas are divided by the new road, Street A. Parcel Area 2-h is approximately 10 acres. Existing land use is industrial with multiple buildings. Proposed development includes office, retail, and a hotel. This parcel area includes up to 420,000 square feet (excluding structured parking) of mixed use office and commercial/retail use, and a 250-room hotel. The hotel is a maximum of 233,000 square feet (excluding structured parking) with a maximum height of 130 feet. Parcel Area 2-h off-street parking spaces will be provided in accordance with Policy A.PK1 for hotels and professional/office space. The required parking will be located in parking structures both above- and below-grade. The above-grade parking structures will be generally located in the center of the commercial structures, surrounded and enclosed by the office; retail, and hotel uses in order to minimize their visibility. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment IV-91 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 136 Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment IV-92 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 137 Subarea Objective/Policies Land Use Objective SA2.LU.1 Provide a well-planned and well-designed, mixed-use, pedestrian-oriented development with amenities within Parcel Areas 2-f, and 2-h. Policy SA2.LU.1.A Parcel Areas 2-f, and 2-h include general land uses in the pattern indicated on the Land Use Map, Exhibit 8. These parcels include up to 1500 residential units, 420,000 square feet of mixed use office and commercial/retail use, a 250-room hotel, and off-street parking structure spaces. Policy SA2.LU.1.6 Development within Parcel Areas 2-f and 2-h shall be subject to the provisions of the LUP, Specific Plan regulations and City site plan review. Devlopment within these areas are also subject to a Coastal Development Permit, which must be approved prior to any development within these parcel areas. Policy SA2.LU.1.C The following shall be the allocation of maximum permitted land useslmajor development intensity for the Harbor Subarea: Residential 105 Dwelling Units per Acre Retail 15,000 square feet Commercial Visitor 250 Rooms Commercial Professional/Administrative 420,000 square feet Policy SA2.LU.1.D Development within Parcel Area 2-f shall include mixed residential development with a combination of high-rise, mid-rise, and low-rise residential development with ancillary retail uses and public spaces. Parcel Area 2-h will include hotel, retail, and professional office uses. By combining these uses into one development area with the facets of numerous activities, the area will become a more active, economically viable, and desirable location. The development will be pedestrian-oriented and will ultimately consume less energy than if these activities were separate and discrete. Policy SAZ.LU.1.E New residential development within Parcel Area 2-f shall be subject to a 220-foot height limit. Policy SA2.LU.1.F New hotel development within Parcel Area 2-h shall be subject to a 130-foot height limit. Policy SA2.LU.1.G New office/retail development within Parcel Area 2-h shall be subject to a 110-foot height limit. Policy SA2.LU.1.H Residential development within the R-MH zoning shall have a maximum development intensity of 105 dwelling units per acre. Policy SA2.LU.1.1 Residential development shall provide usable open space at a rate of 140 sf /unit. Policy SA2.LU.1.J Commercial -Professional and Administrative development on Parcel Area 2-h shall have a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of 2.0. Policy SA2.LU.1.K Commercial -Visitor development on Parcel Area 2-h shall have a maximum FAR of 2.0. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment IV-93 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 138 Circulation Public Access and Parking Objective SA2.C.1 Provide vehicular access that integrates with the Port Master Plan; provide pedestrian-oriented development with access to coastal and other local amenities; provide bicycle circulation routes; and provide parking that accommodates the proposed new development. Policy SA2.C.1.A Pedestrian and bicycle connections shall be provided from all residential parcels, with access across public roads to the primary Bayfront pedestrian and bicycle routes (Exhibits 9c and 9d). Policy SA2.C.1.B Vehicle parking areas within the Harbor District should be visually obscured to achieve apedestrian-oriented, village-scale atmosphere with connected open space areas. Policy SA2.C.1.C On-street parking shall be provided to encourage patronage of retail establishments, slow traffic, and enhance the village-scale atmosphere. Policy SA2.C.1.D Subterranean parking shall be located at or below existing grade. Parking structures at grade shall be screened or partially screened by residential, commercial, office, retail, or hotel uses; or by earth bermed-up against the structure to a minimum of 4 feet in height where the parking structure exterior wall is otherwise exposed. Maximum slope for the berm shall be 2:1 or less, as required by City streetscape standards. To the extent that all or a portion of the structure is below the new finish grade, that portion of the structure shall be considered "subterranean." Policy SA2.C.1.E Any portion of a parking structure 4 feet or more above finish grade shall be considered a building for setback purposes. Such structures shall be given special architectural/landscaping treatment to reduce visual impacts. Above- grade parking shall be constructed of permanent materials (demountable steel structures are not allowed). Objective SA2.C.2 Ensure that the hotel development in the Harbor Subarea accomodates and is accessible fo the broader Chula Vista community. PolicySA2.C2.A Open spaces integrated into the hotel must include activating uses such as restaurants, outdoor sitting and dining areas and retail shops, which would be open to the public as well as hotel patrons. Policy SA2.C2.6 Public access and other path-finding signage should be placed at strategic locations throughout the hotel complexes and to guide guests and visitors to and from public use areas, shops and restaurants, restrooms, and other facilities. Policy SA2.C2.C To help integrate all publicly accessible areas and provide convenience and low cost services for the general public, the ground floor of the hotel development and associated outdoor areas should contain a variety of pedestrian-oriented amenities, which may include reasonably priced restaurants, newspaper stands, outdoor cafes with sit down and walkup service, informational kiosks, ATM's, public art or gift shops easily accessible to the public. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment IV-94 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 139 Policy SA2.C2.D Ensure that the residential portion of the plan is designed to encourage public access and "feet on the street" with features such as a "woonerf walk," where pedestrians and cyclists are given priority. Policy SA2.C2.E Ensure that the residential portion of the plan invites the public into the project to avoid the feeling of a "private' community by including anorth-south garden walk that connects through the site and is intersected by several plazas including a plaza near "J" Street that incorporates ground-level retail such as a cafe and two other large plazas with public art and water features. Locate the garden walk so as to connect up with the pedestrian promenade to extend through the mixed-use development planned to be build north of the site in future phases of the master plan. Policy SA2.C2.F Ensure that the residential portion of the development includes a "marina walk" on the west side of the project that brings the pedestrian into the site. Further enhance the experience by creating an interspersing of ground-level retail between residential units and on street corners. Physical Form and Aooearance Objective SA2.P.1 Provide clearly identifiable gateways to the Bayfront, preserve existing views and create enhanced views with development, and encourage high-quality, well- integrated, mixed-use development. Policy SAZ.P.1.A The intersections of Bay Boulevard with "H" Street, and "J" Street shall be primary entries into the Bayfront. These gateways shall establish a memorable image for the Bayfront. Landscape framing and architectural elements flanking the entry shall reflect the importance of these entrances. Utilities and Areawide Gradino Objective SA2.U.1 Allow development intensity that provides for the economic development of the Bayfront, within the capacity of public service and infrastructure systems. Grading design shall result in (1) all habitable spaces situated above the 100-year flood level, (2) to the extent possible, parking spaces obscured from view, (3) adequate slopes for surface drainage; and (4) project balance with on-site grading. Policy SA2.U.1.A New development within Harbor District shall locate, to the extent possible, first level parking slabs on or near existing grades. This will ensure that (1) all activity levels (vs. parking levels) are above the 100-year flood line, (2) the major circulation arteries coincide with these activity levels, and (3) most parking is hidden. Policy SA2.U.1.6 No new development that requires excavations to a ground level requiring permanent de-watering shall be permitted. Policy SA2.U.1.C No import or export of soil that will have significant environmental impacts shall be permitted to balance grading quantities, without an environmental analysis and mitigation program. Policy SA2.U.1.D Cut and fill activity shall be consistent with the Army Corps of Engineers requirements. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment IV-95 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 140 Policy SA2.U.1.E The provision of all utilities and service shall be achieved and timed to serve new development through public facilities programs or by agreements with the City and the Port, or some combination thereof. Environmental Manaoement Objective SA2.E.1 Protect environmentally sensitive lands in the Harbor District while implementing a land exchange option that places more intensive residential development on disturbed lands. Policy SAZ.E.1.A Activity along most sensitive areas adjoining wetlands shall be restricted per land use designations. Intense development shall be set back from sensitive edges and clustered toward the central portion of the site. Policy SAZ.E.1.B The siting and orientation of major high-rise buildings shall respect the adjacent environmentally sensitive issues. Policy SA2.E.1.C New development shall obtain all necessary permits to minimize impacts to, or from, environmental conditions such as required hazardous site assessments and wetland impact analyses. Objective SA2.E.2 Consistent with the requirements of the NRMP referenced above, developments on 2h and 2f must be designed to be sensitive to adjacent wildlife areas. Policy SA2. E.2 As part of its specific residential building designs focusing on the building elevations along J-Street facing south and along Marina Parkway facing west, developers will: Make a good faith effort to incorporate fenestration designs that obviate significant bird strike potential. Appropriate designs may include such features as stepped back building designs, protruding balconies, recessed windows, window cut-ups and/or other fenestration design techniques, with any technique to be considered in light of restricting raptor perching potential; and, To the extent significant bird strike potential remains notwithstanding the design techniques described above, make a good faith effort to investigate and incorporate other economically feasible design and/or construction measures identified as potential mitigation measures in the Final EIR such that bird strike impacts are considered mitigated by the Port and City. • Limit exterior lighting within the residential project to only that necessary and appropriate for resident and general public safety and for informational signage. Walkway lights will be located on low pedestals; • Ensure its projects contain no residential building accent lighting, beacon or flood lighting; Shield exterior lighting within its residential project to restrict intrusion into the J-Street habitat areas; and, Install only non-invasive plant species within its residential, office and hotel projects. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment IV-96 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012- ] 89 Page No. 141 Objective SA2.E.3 Development in the Harbor District should be designed in a sustainable and energy efficient manner as possible. Policy SA2.E.3.A Buildings should meet a LEED Standard of Energy Design, the specific standard level to be determined through subsequent investigations, analyses and discussions in good faith between devlopers of parcels 2-f and 2-h and the Bayfront Coalition; Policy SA2.E.3.6 Construction should meet an enhanced energy efficiency standard of Title 24 2008 PIUS 20%. Policy SA2.E.3.C Development should utilize solar pool heating and solar hot water heating systems for all common area facilities to the fullest extent feasible given design limitations on appropriate solar panel locations. Policy SA2.E.3.D Projects should utilize C-10 licensed contractors for installation of PV systems. Policy SA2.E.3.E Developers should install Energy "Star" qualified products where such products are generally equivalent in quality and cost to competing products. Policy SA2.E.3.F Make a good faith effort to investigate and incorporate other products, materials and techniques to reduce energy consumption and generate energy on-site where such products, materials and techniques are deemed by the project developer to be cost effective. Objective SA2.E.4 Development in the Harbor District should be placed at an adequate distance from existing hazardous material generators to protect the health of residents. Policy SA2.E.4 Development of residential units shall maintain the following minimum separations from its residential developments: (a) 1,000-foot distance from the BF Goodrich facilities north of H-Street; (b) 1,000-foot distance from the existing power plant south of J Street; and, (c) 500-foot distance from the existing I-5 freeway main lanes. Objective SA2.E.5 Development in the Harbor Subarea should protect the health of residents and wildlife areas by remediating any contamination before construction begins. Policy SAZ.E.5.A Parcels contaminated with hazardous materials will be remediated to levels adequate to protect human health and the environment Policy SA2.E.5.B Secure the approval of all agencies having jurisdiction over contaminated soil and/or soil gas remediation activities required in conjunction with the development by NCVW of the Exchange Properties. Policy SA2.E.S.C Ensure no development of 2-f and 2-h will occur prior to required contamination remediation and approval of agencies having such jurisdiction. Objective SA2.E.6 Construction and development of parcels 2-f and 2-h should be carefully managed to reduce impacts from dewatering on adjacent wildlife habitat. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment IV-97 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 142 Policy SA2.E.6.A Prepare and submit a Plan for approval of all agencies having jurisdiction to address groundwater contamination issues associated with temporary construction dewatering. Policy SA2.E.6.B Secure the approval of all agencies having jurisdiction to regulate foundation designs that penetrate groundwater. Policy SA2. E.6.C Design development on 2-f and 2-h such that it will not result in any permanent dewatering discharges into San Diego Bay or other water courses; SUBAREA 3 - OTAY DISTRICT 1. Special Subarea Conditions The Otay District is located generally south of "J" Street and west of I-5. The Otay River is this subarea's southern boundary. This area is within the Coastal Zone but only a limited number of parcels are within the LCP Planning Area, Subarea 3. Approximately 158 acres and 13 parcel areas are within the Subarea 3 LCP boundary. An additional inland parcel area (Parcel Area 3-k) within Subarea 3 is located south of the western end of Faivre Street, adjacent to the San Diego Trolley tracks. The site was annexed to Chula Vista in December 1985 as a part of the Montgomery Annexation. It is approximately 10 acres in size and is primarily used as a lumber yard distribution facility and open space. These current uses are unsightly and are especially visible from the trolley tracks, which are elevated along the western edge of the parcel. None of the parcels in the Otay District are part of the land exchange; therefore no changes in land use occur as a result of the implementation of the CVBMP. 2. Subarea Objective/Policies Land Use Areawide policies apply. Additional subarea specific policies have been identified below for the Faivre Street parcel (3-k). Objective S3.LU.1 Improve the appearance of the current uses and establish a land use designation and development regulations which are consistent with the City's land use planning and regulatory structure. Policy- S3.LU.1.A The City shall endeavor to improve the screening and landscaping of the site and shall require such improvements to current City standards with any new use or development permit approed for the site. Policy S3.LU.1.8 All development proposals shall demonstrate that proposed improvements are located outside of the 100 year frequency storm flood hazard zone. Circulation Public Access. and Parkin Areawide policies apply. No additional subarea specifc policies have been identified. Physical Form and Aooearance Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment IV-98 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 143 Objective S3. C.1 Maximize the sense of arrival to the Bayfront via the `J" Street entry and provide clearly identifiable gateways to the Bayfront. Policy S3.C.1.A Provide a clearly identifiable gateway to the Bayfront at the intersection of Bay Boulevard and "J" Street concurrent with the development occurring between "I" and "UMoss" Streets. Policy S3.C.1.B The Bay Boulevard and "J" Street entry shall be a primary southern entry into the Bayfront. This gateway shall provide a memorable image of the Bayfront. Landscape framing and architectural elements flanking the entry must reflect the importance of this entrance. Policy S3.C.1.C Immediately west of the freeway, future buildings on the south side should be sited and designed to reinforce the sense of entry created by landscaping. Policy S3.C.1.D The "J" StreeUBay Boulevard intersection shall be enhanced with landscaping, signage, lighting, paving, and other features, which will identify it as a southern pedestrian, vehicular, and bicycle gateway to the Bayfront. Utilities and Areawide Grading Areawide policies apply. No additional subarea specific policies have been identified. Environmental Manaoement Areawide policies apply. No additional subarea specific policies have been identified. Chula Vista Bayfront LCP Amendment IV-99 April 2012 Land Use Plan Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 144 ~cgi®nal LOCe. LETED~ 9d !DIEGO=;<=~ o »>;::i:`~~` CITY - ...:..-._... ~l SjpZE 54 .. IMPERIAL BEACH i L A N D- P L~ A_~ N` N~ ". IA N- G Gsar~F/ »~'yc5 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA P:x~oc (619)259-1815 Ea: (619)239-4 iii > STATES ~ is /+ ~'''' ~ f :xlco ~~.~~ ~~~ I rx'a C'nactal Prrn+am Q Midbeylrzmt Subar ~ -___ C,pastal Zeta goljdary ~_~ Induslrlal Subarea pro. Subarea boundary 3Q Southern Parcel SLbaree --------- City Limit Line ® Inland Parcel Subarea I v l Falvre S(reet Subarea "~~. ~'© ,Palomar/bay boubvard Subarea ` I v I Wli~le Beluga rah Nallonal '~ /Coa~~a! ~~ With Sub reas Exhi it 2 o y, 1 .6~_ ~ O e~ __ __ ....!!rte: ,~, ~.~ _ _. b r~ ~o z p o. ~ O N O N RESroITrrIAL` RH ~ kfgh CV ;I Vsitor CV-H ~, Visitor/Mghway ~ CP Prolessional & ~ /~rlrmishativa I, PHIAL IR ~i Research & L'vtvted IG ~ General V 1~/ COaSed~ Pr PUBLIC & OPEN SPPC,E PrbGc 8 Ouasl Prlcfc C~ Parks 8 Recreation Water Open Space IR ~~ SPECIAL PLAN ARFA CRD Central Resort District Sweetwater + ~ -~ Wicife Relu L""""'>,;',1 Landscaped //////////// Pr'maryry~ ICi I ro- I16 CFD'~H 3 v m m v IG ~I 7y ti -- -I _~ rn __f~ O C. _: L•~_::: as df O ~o ~ N z~ O N A ~ D1 ~ PU8L1C Source: Design by 5 ~II .2 6 it 9 7 LANDSCAPED PARKING Centra~'l1 Re rt PUBLIC PARK DlstrlCt V® '_ ~9~t Exhibit 64 z o 3 Io NATURE INTERPERTIVE CENTER 4 ~L N O 4 1 4 ~~d D KEY s s U1 Mid-Rise Hotel (op to ioo~) ® tna it asstlal ©High Rise HotelNp to zzs~> ~ 3Q Retail/Residential Above ¢m I~ ®Retail/Residential Above ~ ~ ~ ~ Conference Facilities LANDSCAPE ©ICe RIrII((Park, or alt. Cull. Arts Fac. PARKING ~ Child Care Orll Ramp ®Co-Generation Facility Sports Facility- nis Club 11 Interstate 5 d m in w C~ jUl . ,. I ~ S al g 't7 ~ ~ [D O o ~z ~o N O N ~-~' MAXIMUM BUILDIN, 1 130 Feet 2 't 35 Feel 3 44 Feel ~~-4 60 Feel '--~ 75 Feel i I rwrs: arrant wtrtwrn r"~r,l rngilauoru ram not plur~od for arty bWdmgs. i I .r SPECIAL HEIGI-fT C.OI~DI I-IONS ®2 Hlgh-Rise and 1 Mid-Rise Fbfel Sites ®1 Mid-Rise Cultural Arts FaciSly Sile (up fo 69') ~ 1 Mid-Rise Office Site (Iq to 95-) ® Viewing Tower Sile/Nature hlerprelive Center ®2 High-Rise Residential Sites (up to _229") ~ Special Architectural Feature j~ .v 0 ~~~~ >r o~ bz ~° ~N z° oN ~~ ro ~ o ^Cttl Exisling TroAey I ILyI I Ezisling TroOey Stop .~ S.D. &, A.E. Ralroatl V _HI I11~R I-5,Freeway Exlslin9 Arlerlals mw^ PlannadArlerlals c~u t1 OT}iEFl Regional Bicycle Route Local Bicycle Route Pedestrian Roulo hibit 6 v m ~! m :I, v o ~. ~ O N O N ^. 00 ICJ Firm Archllaclural E -~-~--- Irregular Architectural Edga f"""'""""I Formal Slreel Tree Planing o Informal Grove/Street Planl'vg h~ Landscape Scresning Landscape Parking Distant View to Prolact Getaway ~, L Focal Point i~~; ~ji~ ~. Mayor Open Space end Protected Areas Ol v m m m v r/ Local Coastal G bz ~° ~ N z~ O N .-~ . ~ ~ O ~O -~~--_ Waler Llna \ t-•-•~•r•-•-r Sewer Llne I u I Sewer Pump Slallon Possible Sewer Pump Slallon ... V E 8, v m m -~ m v b ~~ ~o z~ p O. .-~ ~ ~z 0 N _o N 00 c~u Wetlands Buifer Zone\ Primary Butfer Zone Public Park end Open Space Welland Enhancement Desillallon Basin ~~ Naturo Interpretive Center Svreetvrater Marsh Nalkxial a ~ WHdife Refuge Potential Emironmenlaly Sensitive Aroes. Note: Reler also to Policy EM.1.L hibit 9 v m m v ~~~~ 0 ~. a~ bz ~° ~N z~ O N .~ :-~ ~ Do N ~O First Rc of Resil ~ (Two Story Public Park ( Active ) Width Vari 100 Feet Mini i # Location of e and Berm witF~' °rimar Zone Varies Primary Zone 100 Feet Buffer Zone 100 Feet J ~i~~ ~i~~ .q ~~ i Buffer ~ i Wetl Note: Vertical Scale r-~ ~~ ~. inn ibit 10 m m m .~ w co °co° o o • o' .f ~ Wz 0 N 0 N Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 154 1 Davitl SrtdN 8 Associates ~~LJ Y tl i~~ G"ir 4/'eeac~3 j~. L Coastal Program ~0,~3,92 0 Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 155 I E~-IIBIT C ~ ~~ Chula Vista LCP Laod Use Plan Coastal Commission Suggested hiodifications Adopted August 9, 2012 The underlined sections represent language that the City of Chula Vista proposes be added to the certified LUP, and the stwek-out sections arc lancuuge the City proposes be deleted from the certified LUP. The double-underlined sections represent language [he Commission suggests he added, and the ~ sections are language which the Commission suggests be deleted from the existing plan and/or the proposed tent. Land Use Plan Modifications: "fhe following proposed exhibits in the LUP shall be replaced with the new exhibits attached to this staff report as Exhibit H I5. Exhibit I Regional Locatiat; Exhibit 5 Land Exchange; Exhibit 7 Parcel Areas; Gzhibit 8 Land Usc Map; Exhibit 8n Land Exchange Development Cross Section I; Exhibit 36 Land Exchange Development Cross Section 2; Exhibit 9a Circulation Map Road and Public Transportation Nehvork; Exhibit 9h Circulation Map Pedestrian Network; Exhibit 9c Circulation Map- bicycle Network; L"xhibit 10 Fonn and Appearance Map; Exhibil I I Utility Systems Map; 8~hibit 12a Gnvironmental Management Map; Exhibit 126 Grviromnental Resources Map; and Exhibil 13 I.CP and CVBMP Overlap. In addition, the new Exhibit 14 Land Exchange Illustrative shall be added. 'I'hesc Exhibits may be re-titled ac appropriate to be re-numbered sequentially. ?. On Page iii at the beginning of the LIIP, the proposed LIST OF EXHIBITS shall be revised as follows: [... ~ Exhibil I'_u Exhibit 126 Exhibit l3 Exhibit l4 3. On the unnumbered; Page titled Preface located before Page I-1, the following definitions shall be added in alphabetical order under the Definitions heading: Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 156 Chula Vista LCP Suggested Modifications . August 21, 2012 Page 2 4. On Page 1-8, the following additions shall be made to the top of the pace, before heading 2. Area Location and Description: California Coastal Commission. The LCP must be sufficiently detailed to indicate the kind, location, and intensity of land uses and the applicable resource protection policies for development within the local coastal zone. The Land Usc Plan component of the LCI' must provide land use and development policies, which will ensure that development within the local coastal area will be consistent with the provisions of the Coastal Acl.. Both lhe~biec[i~-es_and the_'Policies" of the LUP are the standard of teviety for coastal develonment_pennits:' In addition, the LCP must contain implementing ordinances to carry out the policy provisions of the Land Use Plan. These are provided in the Chula Vista Bayfront Specific Plan, which serves as the implementation plan for the Chula Vista LCP. Second, this LCP must be consistent with, and implement, the Ciry of Chula Vista General Plan, which is the primary local land use and development policy documept. The Bayfront Specific Phut is a conponent oflhc City's General Plan and represents a step toward systematic implementation of the General Plan in the Bayfront. If there. is a conflict between a provision of this LCP and a provision of the General P ap or am other City-adQple plan. resolutimr. or ordinance nut included in the LCP. and ii is not possible fur the devclopinent t2comR1y3yjth both the LCP and ", such other plan~tt591lt1ionsr ordinance, the LCP shall control and take precedence and the <le~lopment sliall not_4c_appr9ved unless it complies with the_LCP ptttvision. 5. On Pepe I-12, the fourth paragraph shall be revised as follows: Chula Vista LCP Suggested Modifica~Consolutiori No. 2012-189 August'_I,zot, Page No. 157 Page 3 • south of the western end of Faivre Street and is curtenily used as a Iwnber distribution lacility and open space. G. On Page 1-13, the second. paragraph under the heading Subarea 3 Otay District, shall be revised as follows: 'this subarea also consists of the small southern inland parcel on Faivre Street •~nnex'd to the City t}om the County of San Diceo in 1985. This parcel is located adi~cent to wetland< associated with the Otay River. The undevelooeJ portion of the ro rty choracterized by native habitat is zoned and desi,nateJ as Ooen Space. 7. On Page II3_, the first patagraph under b. Existing Conditions, shall he corrected as follows: There is currently limited physical,puhlic access to~Chula Vista's shoreline. Tfie only direct public access to the bay is outside the LCP Planning Arca on Port propertv. Phis includes a boat launch, marina, and park that are located off the westerly extension of"J" Street. Also nit Ymt DrOGertV is a Bark and public beach located west nl the Goodrich facility. Public access ig also provided via a shuttle bus that serves the Chula Vista Nature Center, located on Gunpowder Point, and within the boundarits of [he ?Jational Wildlife Refuge. 8. On Page 11=1, the first proposed (nut struck-out) paragraph nit the page under Plan Provisions. shall be revised as follows: Wildlife onpulntions (prim•yily birds) usin the National Wiltlife Refuge will be protected from nhvsic3l and visual intrusion by (I 1 implementinc the arrangement of uses resultin^ fiom the land exchange depicted in the Land Usc Plan, including the placemenrof more intensive land uses farther hom environmentally sensitive areas such zs the National Wildlife Refu~~e and the incorporation of butter nines and other adi'icency measures around sensitive habitat. and (2l through siting and design of buildings according to the design and environmental protection rcuuirements of the LCP. 9. On Page Il-7, the first section at the top of the page, c. Plan Provisions, shall be revised as follows: - - ~i®n-redo signi Gcant diking, dredging or with the development concept within this LCP. ~s Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 158 Chula Vista LCP Suggested Modifications August 2I, 2012 • Page 4 =(2) pdaintaining i ing pr restpring,ptcJyiisly died er<d_dCp2Jts in zxisting a 'vitiwml ch•mnelc tumin ~ basins vessel berthing and mooring areas. and boat IaunchiRg-iamps. ($~ Mineral extraction. including sand for restoring beaSdie.3, eece~nt in environntcntall~ensitive areas. 161 Re~torgtion_purposcs. (7) Nature study,aquacuiture or similar resource_dependenLacKiv_ities.. The preclusion of significant diking, dredging, or filling, beyond the limited conditions allowed by the Coastal Act, ensures consistency with these Coastal Act policies. 10. On Page II-R, the following shall be inserted immediately aficr c Plan Provisions: fR New or e~ an ed_ROrt eneri~2d colsnl-dependent inds~stri•tl facilities including cr2ntut rcial fishing facilities . Chula Vista LCP Suggested Mudificaiia~i~Olution N0.2012-189 npgast2l,ZOt2 Page No. 159 Pace 5 ] I. On Pagc III-5, Ill-(, and III-9 the following addition shall be made to the sections Developed Parcel Areas, Undeveloped Parcel Areas, and Land Exchange Parcel Areas [see 8xhibit #4 of staff report for map showing parcel areas]: Developed Parcel Arear The majority of parcel areas are currently developed. There is potential for these parcel areas to be redeveloped within the limits of the existing zoning and land use d~gnationc and provisions of the LCP: however. the existint- us's of these parcel areas are expected to remain the same. • t•arcei areas i-o mrougu r-care. wiru~uy uc.crv o , parcels are zoned anddesignat~tl Conunercial-Thomughfarc (C= fl. This erect is zoned • n signaled Parks and Recreation tP-Rl. Parcel Arca I-e is existing open space characterized 6v wetlands and native habitat There are four parcels within this area ~Thrce of the parcels are owned by the City and one is ownei by Goodrich This area is zoned and desien•tted as Open Space fO-Sl. • Parcel Arca I-h is characterized as developed with industrial uses with a portion crf the parcel as oven spaces aces This parcel is privately owned This area is zoned and designated for htdustrial- Uencral (I-Gl. • Parecl Area I-i is characterised as developed with cvmmercial uses with a eortionof the parcel as open spaces uses This parcel is privately owned. 'Phis area is zvncd a d_ d~ for Canmtercial Thoroughfare (C-Tl. Parecl Area ~-a is existing open space characterized by wetlands and native habitat There are two parcels within this area both of which are owned by the USFW S and en •omnassthe "PRG" Street Marsh This area is zoned and dc"FjCnated as O-S. • Parcel Area a-b is owned by Goodrich The area consists of existing industrial and commercial land use' including warehouses office, and t~arkiitg fractures The Goodrich facility has been involved in aircraft manufacturing since the early 19411s Par •el Area'-b became known as the Gotxlrich North Campus Facility followinN sale of the South Campus (south of"H" StreeB to [hc Port in the late 1900' Th-North Gunpus facility is _ gcnenlly bounded by Bav Boulevard to the east Marina Parkway to the west- the Sweetwater Marsh~Nutivnal Wildlife Refuge to the northwest.'~F" Street and the National Wildlife Refuge to the north and "fl" Street to thz south. The Goodrich North Campus area is the largest ownership wttlun the Giv's Resolution No. 2012-189 Chula visa LCP Sug,csted Modifications Page No. 160 nugusc 2I, 2012 Page 6 ~iurisdiction, encompassine approsimateh~ 78 acres. The Goodrich North Campus includes three wneslland_use_desi >nag bons: Industrial-Limited and Research (I-RLl Industrial-General (I-G t-and Commercial-Professional and administrative (C-Pl. • Parcel Arca 2-c is commercial land use snd consists of a Pacific Trust Bank and associated parkine areas. This parcel is caned agd d~sienated as 1-G. • Parcel Area 2-d is a small retail complex: Gateway Business Park. which includes the West Marine shop. Kelly Paper, and Fleet Pride The relaitarca includes parkina areas and access frmn Bav Boulevard 'I'bis parcel is weed at~_designaiEd as I-G. • Parcel Area 2-e is a commercial office land use that includes a National University campus. This parcel is zoned and des'<~[t„ rated as I-G. zoned mtd dcsi~~nated as 1-G • Parcel Arcs 3-c contains the PIMAMedical Group building and associated 'surface-parkine areas. This area is zoned and designated as I-G • Parccl Area 3-d contains the LAING olTicc building and associated surface parking areas. This area is zoned and_dc5ignate as I-G. • Parccl Area 3-e contains the Furniture Warehouse on the cas[ side of Bav Boulevard t+nd associated parkine and loading areas 'this areais zoned and design:+ted as I-G.. • Parcel Areas 3-t; 3-g, and 3-h are cuiTently commercial/retail and light industrial uses with various businesses such us nest controh antiuue sales. clothing sales, produce salts, and offices. The business complex is chnr~tcterized by multiple simile-~torv buildin^s storefronts loading darks and parkine areas. These areas arc zoned and ctcsi~nate~l as I-G • Parcel Area 3-i consists of the Bavside Business Park with several different leasers. This area is zoned and defilblmted as I-G. ' • Parccl Area 3-i includes the Grainger building.. This area is zoned and ~t~nated as 1-RL overlay tM-541. In the late 4990x. the M-54 canine designation was changed Chula Vista LCP Suggested ModificatiiahSOllltlOri NO.2~12-1 g9 n ugust'_l. 2olz Page No. 161 Page 7 «~ the City's Industrial- Limited (1-Ll wnc and [he floodolain overlay in the City's General Plan was chanced to the 0-S land use designation. Undeveloped Parcel Areas' A few parcel areas, which arc currently undeveloned. are 11so within the LCP Plannine Area and have the not •ntial for development within the limits of the desienated znnini and land use provisions of the LCP. • Parcel Area I-a is owned by Ote Citv The land is ati-rently vacant and is zoned anJ dcsigna as L-1' The parcel is locatedjust north nt "G" Street and west of a freeway oti-ramp A nortion of the procertv is under the ,jurisdiction ofthz C•tlifomia Dwartmcnt of Transportation (Caltrunsl and is not included in the LCP Plannine Area. The nortion of the property located outside the Caltrans area is approeimately 5 acres and•is planned fbr ottice development in the CVBMP 'T'his parcel has restricted access. . Parcel Area 2-~ is owned by the City of Chula Vista. This site has an area pf l 31 acres it is currenty vacant and is desienated as Publicl0uasi-Public (P- Ol This cite is planned fa' construction of Chula Vista Pire Station Nwnber l 1. • Parcel Area 3-a includes a surface n•trkinhjacent to "J" Street and undeveloned htndc ]pelted behveen Bav Boulevard and 1-5 south pf ",I" Slrcct. Th ~se parcels have the potential for additional development based on existing zoning The surfnce rru'kin~ lot parcel is currently coned atid_d:;.S!Snated as C- V 7"he remaining parcels in Parcel Area 3-a are zoned and e~i hated 1-G. Parcel Arca ~-I includes anprotinntely 18 acres of land previously disturbed and curtentiv vncanl It is currently under the ownership of SDG&E and the Port District •ntd it could potentially be used for the relocation of the electrical substation. Parcel Area 3-I is zoned and_desgnatcd I-G. Land Exchanoe parcel Areas l=our parcel areas have been Vansfen~ed to a private entity •{s n part of the land cxchanee with the Port 'these parcel areas are located in the Harbor District vtd hwe a specific bronosal for development per the CVBMP. Parcel Area ~-f is currcntlypndevelopcd land and includes CVBMP Parcels Ii-13 and t1-14 Thicynrccl area is zoned and~ecienated as Rcsidential- Mired hlarbor District (R-MHI. Resolution No. 2012-189 Chula Vista LCP Suggested Modifications Page No. 162 August 21, 2012 Page 8 and desjenated as Commercial-Visitor (C-V 1 and the northern portion is zoned and desi~;natcd CCP. 12. On Page 111.10, the following additions shall be made under Ohjeclive LU.S: the coastal zone. Objeclire Li/ 5.i >wcr cos! visitor and rc •renlinnal fcrcrlilreFS/jnll he nrolected encrurrnoed rand. where feasible. ornvided development. A ranee of ro2rT.! Noes. sizes. and_LOOm prices should_be_ provide in order to serve a variety of income rnn~ec. On land esisnatcd Cpm~ci~l Visitor. only Convner ial Visitor usce shall hg permitted, Chula Vista LCP Suggested Modifications0).Ution NO. 2012-189 Angnst at, aot2 Page No. 163 Vage 9 Policv II ll 5 5 F Shoal-(enn vacation renta(5_SLe permitted in all residential C4t15islent WithS~ty_epdc cnforctlnent regulations. A short-term yacationlelltal i~ rental of an;~onion of a building in alesidential dish-i cl or I to i0_cotas_e.~.4iYe_dag~eardless of buildipgsi7&, includi+ nn~iultiolc=fatally buildine~~tiu<nle~es. and sincle_f~mily resi en P lieu LU 5 5 fl' If~mor I or conversion 2f ower or modzmte cost ov rniel+t a4Wmin dally ^s i~RCOposrd In the Clty's 'oa51'~1 ~nne_ the illventon' shall be replaced with units that arc of comparable~QSt_with ~ht existing units to_ a removed or converted. The_City_sltall.proactively work~th hotel/nloJelttpcratots.;todoffcr incentives to maintain and rep v ~'s ing nrol eLs reyuired~s_a condition of approval for a coastal devel4pmEtrt permit, tt ngc of overnight a commodation>_are d ed witltill the Chuh V i t Bwfron aSt4r Plan and uth Bav area Hig Si def nevi ~~ rhoce hotels ~wi[h daily room rates 25°io higher tha the statewide av race for aiaslaf?reas. Resolution No. 2012-189. chpla visa 1.CP suggested modificatio„s Page No. 164 .Angnstzt, 201 Page 10 13. On Page III-10, the following additions shall be made after Policy LU.6.A Oh[eclive GU 6 .5 Envta•r l~e~nnvnanillttj~tgfnci/tiieutLe nltRinedmacl_irrlcXrulec! into 6ovfi~mrl c'lnsi rlenl with lAc e~isua! anJ ennirnnn¢•rrln/ c~ocrls ofUre Policv LU.(.S.A C9t i n 'nom ~ttrage_ and transmission ilities. and lit] s shall be sited. desiened, and oneroted to avoid. or minimize impacts to ESI-I~nd scenic resources consistent with all provisions of the_4~P No facil~h' can be located within an area mapped as ESHA~1Lther~ is ^nf_easible_alternative dtat_can_climinate all_imnac the alleIDative_Ihat wopld_result in the fewest_or_Icas[imnacts shall be selected' unders:round, where feasiblo,~•,is_ting comnntuication transmission lines sliould bet~located undeltr4und whClLdle av r~ replaced or when fundine fur t~ dereroundhe is availabS. P icv LU.C>.S.D Anv a4 ~ ~ n for the placemcllT.Si~llstrucllon m,dlor u>cedification ot_pursonal wirelesssel~Qnmunicati~ls_ervice facility sltal111tcludea reps„pts~ed by a_ ttanpi~riatzly ly_ceysccl wisel~ss t~~g~tmunicatia~service Yarility cncineer/technician that dueumguSs whether or not the_nronosed fac' c neceggarv tci till_,_sienifcant vap i the service-provider anolirn,t's Service nenvorli. 14. On Page III-13, the following addition shall be made to [he last proposed paragraph on the pace: Chula Vista LCP Suggosted ModificafonsOlUt101] NO.2~12-189 naqusi 31, 2013 Page No. 165 Page I 1 15. On Page 111-I5, the following revisions shall be made to the proposed new Commercial -Visitor ~C-V) paragraph in the middle of the page: 16. Starting with the last proposed ne~a paragraph on Yage III-15 and continuing through to Page III-.17; the following additions shall be made: , Alloc~ttion~ approaimatcly 6 acres. Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 166 i ~uumu.v - incl udcs res use buildinc acres. , Industrial - scale and m plants. TISe acres. llll C5. Chula Vista LCP Suggested Modifications August 2I, 201? Paee 12 ' Approximatcly~l2 acres are presentlyused for parking by Goodrich. continue to he oennitted and to exnand within the linuts ofihc LCP Allocation: •tooro~imately 134 acres Chula Vista LCP Suegcsted ModificatioiSOlUtiOn No.~2012-189 n uguu z 1, zo 1'_ Page No. 167 Page 13 17: On Page 111-1 Z the following additions shall be inserted after Uhjective U/J: )'~jcy_DI.I 5A_H_ tight limits shall be establisJte_d by Parcel Area as follows: [refrreitce Staff Report Exhibit Zia for map of Parccl Areas] Table 3 1 4 Buildine Hgieht Limits by Parcel Area Parcel Alga 111axitttlllll B ildinQ H ivht from Pad ffcetl* SwePtwat r 1-~ tilictnet'-5~., =,, ;_' 44 Lh 35 L-s l sl 35 lg ~_ 1=f 34 1~' 4 1-h 99 li , ~ ~ ~ ?~ 4425 2c 44 1~l 44 2 =g 44 Z-L' 244 2-~' ~~' 144 Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 168 Chula Visla LCP Suggested Modifications August 21, 2012 Page 1 ~3 Parcel Area MA]ImLm Ruildinn Heioht ' from Pad (fee[I• d 'tySnE ,~~ r { '.r '~ ~ ~ ~_ ~ ~ ,~ _`L.l heie t[s 15 measured from finished crude Ruildine oad ~ shall the raised fron cxis it]g,gLde more th_m 8 f.~c1. Notes' I Pa~cl A_ r~ e~ 1~ ned and de~ignaled nen Soace~ therefore the building heieht limit is 0 fees. ~pS ecific'_cequjis<t11CUtSSitr devzlgrynent standards for buL~ig stttbacks from 7 tre ~t Ciav Boulevard v' •w corridor re punts and build.ngy9_~et3~a~ Contained it the Specific Plan fur Parcel A[c~s 2-h and Z-fl 19.85.012 Special nditio~El ' Chula Vista I,CP Sug~csted Modi(icattae(i~olution No. 2012-189 nagust 21, 2012 Page No. 169 Pa+_c Is S.Iici~•ht limit is o masimunt_pf z~fect c+r no_hil;hcr lhanJhc elevation ctl_I-5 from the J Strect_Over{7as ad'acent_t2the site to maintaiit_csistin~ up blic vicw~[oward the Bay vcr_an}~tructure. l8. On Page If 1-26, the followine new policy shall be added slier Policy AC.2.A: Pulicy AC ~ !3 The Port vtd the Citv shall o•vticipate in'tmulti-jurisdictional effort conducted by Caltrvts and SANDAG to assist in devclopine a detailed 1-5 corridor-level study [ha( ++•ill identify trnnsoortation imnrovements alonc+vith fundine includine federal stole reeion~l ~md local fwtdina sources. and ph'tsint; tb'it would reduce conecetion n-~~°-°~., and imRrove tnffi i~n;;cn>_c~isQttiistcnt n•ith Caltrans st-tnd•trds on the 1-5 South corridor from the SR-54 inlerchanec to the Otav River Local fundine sources identified in the Plan shall include fair-share contributions related to private and/or public development based on news t+s well as ocher mechanisms. 'fhe_I-5 c4rridpr seynent lies within the LCP planningarea and i hown mt_lhe ih'g 'irwhui4i vV~ctn Any altcralion is o the I-S~e~tn~~1L~! a~~CCialc~ inmrovements thot impact +vstlands or BSh1A shall he limited to incident•tl public services in the wetland context or resource dependent nctivitics in the_ESI-IA cQntcxt and~hall bu_SUbjtct to approval of an L I'A by the Cos to CommisfliQn. t9. On Pagz III-2ti, the proposed Policy AC? shall be revised as follows: Policy AC?.BC Circulation facilities shall be designed, constructed, and maintained according to State and local standards to ensure that safe and efficient circulation systems are provided.'fhe protection of sensitive habitats may require roadways to be built ki {stxrtcirotxie~ not-tl+te:tE~t-pt.afe~ preservc~tlandiand ESI1A. 20. On Paec III-26; the proposed Objective ACA shall be revised as follows: Objective rF~3 AC. d Roult trod den'ign rnndwcrpc in a nrnrrner trhiclr mit»Marrs r~i.dc rrdvcrcc• rr/iri~•h~v~rr-:rhfcr~k iiry;acLLfn rtedunds. prolecls funds u~ilh high reerenlirnr nnhre, and mvirlc fragiuertlaliwt of developable lands nuo inndegrane/r .cLerl or locnred prrrcelc. 21. On Pagz III-26. die proposed Policy AC.4.A shall be revised as follows: Policy AC.3.A AC.4.A Major roadways shal I follow the alignments depicted on ~tp+yii-S-Fage-H-1~?; i» Exhibit 9a wlttnFt~+artca~fxFty d+'tewrrir,~:~;r;r~z+ed t~consistentw~ilh the Ubjective. 1ZeSOlUtlori NO. 2012-189 Chula Vista LCP Suggested Modifica[ions Page No. 170 August zl, zo12 Page I6 22. On Page III-27, the following new policy shall be inserted after the proposed Policy AC.S: 23. On Page 111-27, the proposcd Policy AC.6.A shall be reviscd as follows: comprehensive-'f•° •~~~..R,..-c~::~}a„° Public Access PlanIPAI'1 been oreoared and aoorovcd for the CVRMP anri is plan 2d. On Page III-27, the following neon policy shall be inserted after the proposcd Policy AC.6.A: 21. On Page III-2K, the proposcd Policy AC.9.P shall be reviscd as follows Chula Vista LCP Suggested Modi[icaGoesolution No. 2012-189 Augnsut,2l)l2 Page No. 171 • Pagc 17 26. On Pagc 111-30, the proposed Policy RI.I.K shall be revised as follows: Policy RI. LK Additional access shall be constructed to the Bavfront from the 1-5 off- ramps includina (l) ~n exclusive southbound ri^ht-turn lane for the `L"' Su'cct.I-5 southbound off-ratnp and !?) an ccclusive southbound rieht-turn lane for the "H" Street/l-5 southbound oft=ramus. This ace s shall of be nedp7itted to im act wet ands 27. On Page 117-31, the second paragraph under 4. Public Transit Objective/Policinx, shall be revised as follows There are three two major public transit objectives for the Bayfronc They--ara (1) maximize use of the two trolley stops adjacent to the Bayfront area and (2) provide future shuttle bus service to interconnect the Bayfront with the trolley stations and the adjacent corm mun try 2r+d ° `-r '~,~T°'~.~t°--..^ "^ r ^'''rate„zg f.,:+t-saFrBied-2tnp19y+1xH ^~^"+^~."3a.e;.~s~ Oh'm;~a:d~.~,~;ropdsedtle.tit3atrex . ~ c ,.~r ~ :,r.:_ .... .e~a~.....c___... As_n~ed above. a comprehensive C,1mh Vic[a Bavfront Master Plun Puhlic Access Prouram (PAP) Ims linkages, implementation o[a ner~Chula Vista Bavtiont public shuttle roadway impCUVetnettts, ai_id parliill ~ eyuirelttenYS. 28. On Page III-31 continuing onto Pagc 111-32, [he proposed OF?jective PT? shall be revised as follows: (lhiective PT'(1cC nfpxhlir tr•nnsit servieu' by ri.citnrc and residents q/The 6onjront +Itrxekl shall he promoted mrd/~irh•ate irerrrrit shuttle services a'HrxeFd .ebrr I he cncurrrugcul rrfnere )easihte. The Purt.and City shall esplnre Ore operating wu! finuling putesrtiu! jor a Iju rhnttle s~wiee that we~tkl ipi~ (ink vuriuus deainulinrts tvidrin O:c western pa'tiars gl'Chu1a 1'i.du, including the Chula Vi.uu _l3gvfi»nt plan aces ar deserihed in the Pub is 9 'crsa' Plan. 29. On Page III-32, proposed Policy PT.2.P shall be revised as follows: Policy PT '_ D Plan the initial ^enerul route of the transit shuttle to travel alone ThirJ Avenue benvccn F Street and H Street alone F Street between Woodlawn Avenue and Third Avenue alone Woodlawn Avenue between C Street and F Street aloof; F Strcct. Marina Resolution No. 2012=189 Chula Vista LCP Suggested Moditcations Page No. 172 A agust 2 I , 20 l2 ' Paee FS Parkway Streel C and Street A within the Bavfront development area, and along li Street between the Bavfront and Third Avenue. 30. On Page III-32, proposed Policy PT?.P shall be revised as follows: PplicY PT2F nr_._ e__ _~ .w _.. _ _ _ __ +n ._'_ _ _r~$itw_-ltABB fiderykt•~ ~ To initiall~sncou ce public use of the shuttle. shuttles would topically run evcrv I S ninute .After the shuttle se[vice has ~esn cstablishe it may~bc_pt:udept to reevaluaCe sh t equcncy based on-tlte_ridcr~h(p thal iS.~chiev_edl2dcCenniitt ' ch~jn headwavs. 31. On Page III-32, the follmving new policy shall be added after proposed Policy PT.2.F: 32. Starting on Page ]I1-32 and continuing to Page III-32, Proposed policy Objective PB.1 and proposed Policy PB.LA shall be revised as followed: Policy PB.I A 8xistinc bikeway eorridm's alone roads and hi4hwavs sAoukl shall be uperaded. as feasible. to reduce, minimize or eliminate any potential Iia~ards between motor vehicles and bicycles, consistent with sensitive environmental resource and visuaLresource protection policies. hnprovcments to am• roadway cont<iinine a bi kewav ~~ sha not adversely affect the provision of bicycle use, to the czten[ feasible. 33. On Page III-34, proposed Objective PK.I shall be revised as follows: Uhjeclive Pk'./ ,¢rrrrlAe•-e+•l dequntepm'kirrg shm.M shu be prnvidedfnr a!/ rlm~e/need accts in Ure 6at~'wn, includin~urkirm tar ullpnhlic nark and nnen space aces in the Qnv('vn1. Ptn•kinY .rhmdd he rn'oricted in rot ~icicnt nrunter aharine pueea~ umone xscs mhen practical and in u manner drat does nut in(rude upon the scenic nualities v! dre• 6m'(runl. Parkine +vithin the SDGcf E R(91f' nm'Celc should he provided to meet j i crop ~ r vided~ltxlLe~ignatu[e~aLtlie~l2ecrcatiQnaLV_eltitle Park. nd [he I~in Otay Distrjc~as these uses_1Le developed. Chula Vista LCP Suggested ModificatSD~tStO~Utiott No. 2012-1 g9 nn~ust' 1, 201 ~ Page No. 173 Page 19 p n~kine r>mrirrnu•nls pruvided Ihr /lt)11' purkine it lrrz~deeafled 1n inmrnre dre overall crppeunmec of the I3pl;•Irnnl. x•hilc presen'inr> puhfic riexslo the f3a1, ' 34. On Page,lll34, proposet3 Policy PK.LB shall be revised as follows: Policv PK t B Adequate parkine shall be provided to serve coastal access and rec7eation uses Lxistine parkins; areas servine recreational uses may not bt displaced-unless a comparable replacement area is provided. 35. On Page Il I-35, proposed Policy PK. LD shall be revised as follows: PnlicyPK.l.@D Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided for developed uses according to the following schedule. Only those uses listed below are required to provide bicycle parking. Bicrycle parking facilities shall he fixed storage racks or devices designed to secure the frame and wheel of the bicycle.. [...] Residential irtHarbor: bicycle racks slnll~+e Rroyided for 5_perceniaf vi ~itor motorise ivchiclc oa[ki caoaciri. with a minittlidu of one iwo-bike capacity rack 36. On Page III-36, proposed Policy PK.I.G shall be deleted: 37. On Page III-37, proposed Policy PK. LI shall be revised as followed: Policy {~-~S-APK_l.l Whdre parking is incorporated into the SDGK.G ROW, tbrtaf-berws~twvisio°-m-~`';~a::, the parking areas shall be landscaped with a perimeter planting of trees and ground cover. The tree planting will be tiehtly spaced to provide a dense canopy at ' ~ eye level. Tree species will be limited Io those that will not interfere with the overhead power lines and trimmed as necessary to meet _ standards of SDG~@G Duc to environmental manoecment reauirments this nolicy does not apply to Subarea I' Sweetwater District.:l7ee plantin~~ shall not encroach inttLidentifiedyiew co ' R2SO1l1YlOll NO. 2012-1 $9 Chula Vista LCP Suggested Modifications Page No. 174 nugnst z 1, zo 12 Page 20 38. On Page III-38, proposed Objective FA2, Policies PA2.A and FA:L.6 shall be revised u follows: Obiectirc R-0.? hnnrnoenrenrs 1n the public rculut nJ+«rer{el ~><r« be rvrude in ~onirarcrinn wirh inrnrocemuus ro in fividu rl p ircels r/v'wrih priv rte derclovntenl. Policy FA ~ A Concurtent with the preparation of Phase I infrastructure dcsien plans for E and li Streets, a Gatewav plan sh111 be prepared for E and fI Streets Prior to issuance of occupancy for any projects within the Port's jurisdiction in Phase I. the E and H Street Gatewav plan chill be improved by the Port and City's Directors of Plannine and Duildine The E ~tnd H Street Gatewav plan shall be coordinated wish the Gatewav plan for J Street AlI Gateway_plans~nust cvnfonn w~th the ~eiLaslcsolices mid he~f;hl_IintiS:: in the LUP. ' Policy FA 2 B Concurrent with development of Parcel of the applicant shill ~uhmil a Gateway plan for J Street fur City Design R wicw contidention Prior to issuance of any building permits, the J Street Gatewav plan shall be - approved by the Director of Planning and Duildin^ in coordination with the Port's Director of Planning 'fhe I Sn'ect Gatewav plan shall be coordinated with the Gatewav plan for E and FI Streets Further policies guiding Gatewav dcsien are provided in the followinc ccctiom II( LC.31 QII Gatewav plans mutt conform with the setbn'k n licie' and hejizhtlimits in tl>_c_L l II?. 39. On Page III-38, proposed Policy FA.2.P shall be revised as follows: Chula Vista LCP Sus_ested Modificafiansolution NO. 2012-189 .._ nngust 21, 2012 Page No. 175 Page ? I 40.On Page Ill-40, proposed Policy FA.3.E shall be corrected as follows: placement. 41. The single paragraph on Page 111-02 shall be revised as follows: To promote these ohjcclives and policies. peso+sieets-of=i}te „-~~ ~^~,o}n,:-;,~,:r,a.-}g~three major components have been identified (ha[ comprise the physical (pmt oflhe area: (I) natural resource areas to be preserved; (2) an accessible open space system including walkways, bicycle ways, and park areas; and (3) development units having cmnmon usage and/or yualitics, which should he treated as distinctive, but closely interrelated, visual entities. To reinforce the physical yualit}' of these three components, the Form and Appearance Mapr£alril3it-7; Page-FFl--j Exhibit 10, identities -I~-tnq~-r'~-`~^~elttt"_...__i~-~.:~rriews a,m-~-,a;td,~p~z„a.-~=~,--~a,~ncttert: major gateways and views. These1~rz 42. The first paragraph on Page 111-44 shall be revised as follows: Certain points of access to the Bayfront will, by use, become major entrances to the different parts of the area, A significant portion of the visitors' and users' visual impressions are influenced by conditions at these locations. Hence, special consideration ekeald shall be given to roadway design, including signage and . liehting, landscaping, the protection of Rublic vicws_and the siting and design of adjoining structures. These special gateway locations are shown on [he Fonn and Appearance Map, ~.: '~`-~.,,a,4-,~, °"ge-}i-1-0 @xhibit 10. 43. On Page 111-44, proposed Objective G'1'. I shall be revised as follows: 44. Slartiag on Page,lll-45 and continuing unto Page lIl-46, proposed Policy V W.LA shall be revised as follows: ~ Policy V W. Ln Public v~ietvs yitE+ekf shall be protested and provided firom frCCW3YS. _ '1, Formatted: Double strikethrough ' nor roads Bavfront perimct ~r - ' "~-me.*„` -''-" ~''~-`~~' Resolution No. 2012-189 ('hula Vista LCP SuCCested Modifications Page No. 176 __ attgnst 21. zol? page 32 dev~ts. Policies rccardine_ each of these catcaorics are provided below. Views from Roadways within the Site (particularly from ~~ Boulevard and Marina Parkway to the marshlands, San Diego Bay, parks, and other bay-related development.) Development and activity sites shall preserve a sense of proximity to the bay and marshlands. 45. On Page IIt-4G, proposed Policy V W. LD shall be revised as ti+llows: Policy V W. LD Buildines and structures sl~nid shall be sited to provide unobstructed ps~blic view corridors from the ncnrest scenic hi ~hway >r pu lie view corridor road. These criteria may he modified when necessarv to mitieate other overcidio~nviromnental considerations such as protection of habitat or wildlife corridors 4G. On Page I I I-46, proposed Pulicy V W. L6 shall be revised as follows: Policy V W.I.E Public views of the Bav and access alone the watertront s shall beyrovidcd via a proposed "Baywalk" promenade This ~destrian oath wEw1d ~Yilf also connect to the Signature Park, and the pazhwav system within the Sweetwater District. ultimately linkin_¢ the hvo districts and "enabline viewers to experience visual cmttact at close ran,e with thaBav and marshlands 47. On Page II1-07, proposed Policy V W. LM shall be revised as follows: Policy V W LM Public views of the Bav from IHe D Strec E Street F Strect,_L SI[~ and_Palonmc_Stt_eet R~t;~c~ con~idors shall be preserved and a lac views of the Bav would he created from the H Street corridor 4R. On Pave lil-47, proposed Policy VW.I.N shall be revised as follows: ime development is oroonsed in these loc_ ~mts. the ih~ shall idyl tifv public view corcidors that will et sure public views of the bay from Bav uulevard are_protectzd and preserved. The City shall coordinatf witltShe PortJ2istrict to urstect public vicws_from deyelgnJnent_on pat&cls withii>_tbe_Po~i District's iurisdictipn Chula Vista 1,CP Suggested Modificafionsolution No. 2012-189 Angnstal,zolz Page No. 177 Page 23 49.On Page III-47, proposed Policy VW.3.6 shall be revised as follows: 50. Starting on Page I I I-47 on continuing to Page III-48, proposed Policy V W4. LA shall be revised as follows: Policv VW.4.A Suns shall be deli coed and located to minimize impacts to visirnl resources Signs approved a+ part of commercial development shall be incorpor+ted into the desicn of the protect Pent iL_inOnument signs shall n2tear~esLsight 1'cc[jnlleigltLT[ec-standin, proof signs arc to oI1161Y~d. •• 1 .-'....~_L'..L.-_A.. :.J.I. 1:...'r.,~:.._..... E@€flESitrP~Nt'4iL`11MH1dN~S'~t199 _~ L '.L~ 51. On Page III-49, proposed Policy LS.1.6 shalF be revised as follmvs: Policy LS.I .B °°- ~',-~,.,g,z.~" -°^ °~a:.. 6. Automobile parking has been recognized by SDG&E as a compatible joint use of their I50-foot-wide ROW that kiseets transects the entire Bay (runt. l'he Port Master Plan and CVBMP al eo desienate this ROW as a linear ereenbelt. I ,„t,.~.Ho a''-a,,,n„{,nzL %R-.;aaa;-~.^.p~c-t-t>€the-pewel~l+nes To su~cngthen the ground plane connection between both sides of the ROW and provide an app'nnrinte ereenbelt character, an aggressive greenbelt ptanting program shall he implemented ~m-irnryn L ' t:. paver-}ine;: within the RnW. SDG&E criteria will only permit planting that can be maintained at no more than I S feet in height, ' thereby maintaining sufficient clearance at the lowest point iri the power line catenary. Planting in any parking areas provided shall establish a dense ground plane massing of shrubs and short trees to cieate a grove efTbct that screens cars from view. This policy does not ' arn9v in Subarea I' Sweehvater District. A_II landscapin ~ will e desi•~ned tQ_et su~tat identified pttblic~w corridors ure maintained. 52. On Page III-55, proposed Oblective GD.I sha11 he revised as follows: OGicc[ine GD.I---Fr< de-!« kmar 'Nrwr»w ! r rl-r.*ernt~l+ ! - ^' - .; .-ram- An ade mate ~+rsrr • c[orru (r rirrnee evelem Resolution NO. 2012-189 Chins Vista LCP Sug ~esteJ Modifications Page No. 178 ~ Angusrz t, 2otz , Page 24 ' ylrexrk!_g/JgIL be orovidcd In prechrde developnann'r storm wcrler nurafffierm drai+riue directh~ into wetland hahilar ur Sun Uievn L3uv rritlronl udeyucac Iikerine of sedimerils uncUur nollnlcnyv The imnan ufsuil ahrsn/d slurU he nrininri.ed ru the nmsinrunr csrerrt nrucricahle far dr~uvleiliun ofdevelanable w~eus fierm Iuudbre durinc~lhc 100- ' ~i~ear deli n slornr. 53. On Page III-57, the last sentence of the second paragraph on the page shall be revised as follows: The USFWS refuge lands and other open space areas, including potentially Environmental Sensitive Habitat Areas (ESh1As) are shown in the F.,nvironmental Management Map (Exhibit 12a). Sd. On Page 111-63, proposed Policy EM. LD shall be corrected as follows: 5,5, The following new policies ~shnll brinserted at the top of Page I I l-ti5, before proposed Policy EM.LE. f?olicv FM I.Da:FnvironmentaJlXsensitiye_hahila.L.ttiea" me:an~atly arz_a in~vhich plant or animal life or their habitat• n e ither rare of egp~Gially valuableLecause of theiLSpecial mluLe or role irLan ecosystem and whit Gould be easily ~ iict ~rbe or de __,_ - hwtlan activities and develo_nmerits. Areas that shall be considered ESI-1A. ulllSSS [here is comoellin>: site-specific evidence to th rnnrarv include but arenet ' ~ limited to the following ~ ~- Anv habitat area that i rare or espc~ ally valuable fro n a local. reei pal. or tate side basis. flLeas that contribute to theyiab~lity of nlanl_or~ninml species dtsignated as taro, threatened, pLendangct:edJtn__ir`er Stan or 'ederal law. Areas that corllLtl2ut to tl e viabiliq~ of species desienated as Fullv Prsztected ot_SDgGi~' e~S~tci~l_Cs2ocern unrlGL~taSt• laws oL rekulations. Chula Vista LCP Suggested Modificahb7l~°lution No. 2012-189 Angast 2t, zo iz ~ Page No. 179 ' Page 25 • Arias that contripute~szthe viabilit~of_plant species for which there is compelling uyidence of rarity, for_esample, those d~s~i};n r d by the Calij rnia Native Phnt SoCict. a~S ~b ( Lf. i!t endan4ered in alifornia and elsewherel. such as Nutlall's scrub oak c+r •`2_Irare. threatened or endangered in ~liforni~ b .t more common elcewhcrr) su~as wart-stemmed Cc•+notltu~, policyF~M 1_r °' New develo~e~ shall be sitcd~nd~~Ued to_avoid.impact o environm nt•+II}t srntsiti c tebitat areas (ESHAI. ESHA shalL~t arotected •}gainst any ~ienificlnt disrnotion of habilat~+es and only use de r urces ~hal '+ ' I' t real. [Ze~elo ment in ace;ls 1dLacen[ Li environmentally sensitive habitat areassutd narks.and recreation areas shall h~ sitttiand designed ttt prey nt impacts which wouW~gniticantly deandc those'+rea5 agd shall be c~nnoalible with the continuance of those habit t ud en'eation arena Tlte„c,yise include enhancement/r ~sl ration work passive resrcational parks and mtblic accei~or rccrcativrtal facilities such as t[aih an~bike_paths_integrsnled~tlt~thc natural_cnvimnment and sited Inddesigned to preserye_aod~e_compatiblc with, native habitat j11~n DUSed. additio tal~abitat on the created fl ~odolain Site specific studiesS~i assess_the exten[,Ztld_guality t t~.lse~eurccs_atlhr,~it_a will b~r,_eyuircd at the time_dcyclnpment i proposed. RCSOlution No. 2012-189 Chula Visa LCP Suggcstcd Modifications Page No. 180 nugust 2 t, 2012 Page 26 dcsienated as_GShl A,lhe policies and_standards iii the LCP an licable tp~uch sensiii_ve~s2u[cetshall_apuly ma~pdate and LCP Amendment. Chula Vista LCP Suggested Modifica[dift5olution No. 2012-1 g9 Aagast 31, z012 Page No. 181 _ Pale 27 protect Policy l'M I D I'' Protection of ESHA and nublieaccess shall take priority over other develomnent~tandaric an where tLier is anv cmtflict between general develonmentytandards a tt~~IiA~a~~ tiblic access protection the~tandards Ihal are tnpSLIlCgtective of ESHA and public a~tall-have precedence saltwater marshes freshwater marshes ones ox closed brackish wa4e[ m'trshes. swamps nmdtlats a d fens. Anv umna ned areas thaLmc_rt these criteria ais ~retland ~ id shall be ~~f1 QC ed all of th nrotec 'un pr6videJ for wetlands in the l.ll_F?. ReSOlutiOri NO. 2012-189 Chula Vista LCP Suggested Modifications Page No. 182 nngnst 21, zo lz Page 2R t_'Qlcy EM 1 Q. LS The biolo>;ical Aroductivity andshe_uuality~5tf wetlands_shall be pr_ole~i~d and,_whet:e.feasilzl_e„restored ~- Sb. OU Page911-65, policy EM. LE shall be revised as follows: ~(a) The dikin e. filling or dredeine of Oven coas4ll waters v~•etlands~estuari es=and lakes ch;~11 be o rmined in ac ordance with etheF applicab]e orosiaions_of thiidieivan_whcre thet:e~lto feasible less environs( nt~ally damaeing al(ernative. and where fea-ibl ' u ideation measu res have been orovi ed to n11n IIniZC a verse environmental e ffects. and3hall be limited to the lollowinn: e(J T~e.~or capande_d_tu2rt, energy„ and_coastal-dependent industrial facilities, includine commercial_fishinc facilities. t~l M~int~isine cxisti_na or restorine nrevio Iv dredecd i Ihs in ezstine navicational channels turnine basins. vessel h rthim• end moo[1tLCALeas, and]toat lauttEhin~ ramps. la-- n opctL&4ait41 watcr~o(1(g~tban wctla tt_d~cluding &tiflatns. e~[Ua[L~_ and Iake,S. new or ex[landed boalinc fac11it1e5.;inS1 the Ala_ccmeut4fstructuraloilinesfor2ultlctecreationa nier that provide nub is access and recreational ono rtunilie5 a(a1_IACldental_pulzicyervicc_pur2otes,_includinY..l?ut not limitcd_t2 huryiA~eables andplRe or inSRSC i n of piciS 2t>_~ maintenance off' exislingintake and outfall lines. (51 Mineral e~tmction. includine sanJ for rc Lorin^_ beaches. egcgt~in cnyjrQAtAenlally sensi_liv~ areas. ~(6~estoratlas_2uipose _ Chula Vista LCP Suggested Modificatonsolution No. 2012-189 Aagust21,2o12 Page No. 183 Page 29 7 Nature study. aquacultur . or similar resource deFendent activities. 57. On Paga III-GS, the following new policies shall be inserted afterproposed Policy EM.I.E: In cases where buffers hive not vet bec~Lestablishcd a bu er of a IeaS[ ISZQf~~t_in ~yidth trott)_thc upland ~dfe of wetlan~ls~trci at least 50~et ht widililipltEthc uplsind~€dge_ofripa[ultiltalzitat.ShaiLLe establisL~d buffer shoal take in o account and aslspt Tor rises_in.~ea del by incorvora' ~ wetland t. ~ ~_i n area r other sea level rise ad ot~tion ctrates~ies as apnrooriale The CDFG and l ISFW S must be consulted in~tch buffer dctenninations'+nd in some casts the rcauire~ buffer. esbecially far aJt marsh weSlands, could be erecter than_1Q0 feet lLs~iand doyzlopmen[ withittbuffecareas_flhall_he ased on a~rojtcted sea lgv_el_ria_c. recordation of an ooen spac!<~emcttlor other usable deyjcz that Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 184 Chula Vista LCP Suggested Modifications August 2 L 2012 Page 30 SR. On Pnge 111-C>5, proposed Policies EM. LP and EM. LG shall be deleted as shown: 59. On Page III-65, before heading 3. Nattval Resources Management Plan (NRMP), the following Objectives and Policies shall be inserted: aonronrialc and the Cily. or ~pmmissimt on appeal. must find that the evelonment could nut he feasibly con [rutted with ut a reduced buffer however. in no cave sh II the buffer he Icec thin 50 feet Chula Vista LCP Sugecsted ModificafPonsolutiOn No. 2012-189- nngnstzl,2ol2 Page No. 185 Page 31 Policy_EM_ .2.A I Watershed Plannine. tn: I 1 pursue fundin ~ c he d _ tcr~he or Identify ri ~h~ wltersheds whcrelhere are known water gstRlit ornblcmc r where develoomci t oressurea nre ercatest 31 Asscsihad uses in the p[isttit`' areas that degrade coastaLwater quality, 41 Ensu[ firll puhli4participalion in the_plan'~ development, designed to cosure the following:. ' ,~ proteclltcneficial uses uf~ tea ~rs areas_necessar~to maLltain ring i~~yualiC_121gSA, and/or arcaSlha[ are susceptible to erosion and sediment loss. ~ 1 LuniLi11G1'C1SC5 of iml2crvious ground surfac s to the maximum cztem oracticablc. tl Limi(_lansl disturbance lctivitie5_such as_clearin~ and >:radine Pcn Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 186 Chula Vista LCP Suggested Modifications August 21, 20 L? Page 32 Policy_EM.2.~I,~t' Impact Development Site_Qcsign MYs • I vclopm~Rtr)ttll_ic desiepcd so ac I minimize direct Rysical ewtecli~nc of impervious surfaces and to promote'txGltration u,~~~ ID techniques to the maximum eaten orac[ic~bl • Projects as_dcfined in the cun'ent NPDES Municipal Pennil_for [he San icg~Regic it ~shall,_to_lhc nm~illwnteztecLnmctic~a'b{,lc~~~gminimize the induction of Pollutants of ~oncem th~u mlyleypll it~alpu1u.61nt ' ~tct generated fr : site runoff to the storm drain:tac system. • All dcvclQpntent_Shall alsstd~ntrgl_agst~ev'elgpmeultRflak_stqcnt yvalcr cunvffdischarge_ratcs and ~~elocitics tLmainmin aueducc prc- devdopment_dizwnslceam erosigti and w proteersireanthatLilot in accordnnc~e ~s~ithlhu City of Chula V ist~ hydromodificalion control reguirem nts includ d in the City`s SUSMP. • All dcvclopment_can address thcs~ obieclixes_thcaugh Ute creatign of ~ hydtglggically_funetional_projcd design that~atteinpt~tQmimic_the naturul hydrologic regime. Xoluns_bascd IIMI?s and the R$th_perttntile,_I-hour storm event Ibr flmy- Policy ~M.2.C Minimize Proicc `Impervious Poggirint 8: Conserve Nlturil Areas • Conscrvc_na4n'al accas, soils, and vegetation whcreleasiblc. • se natural draina~c systems to the maximum ex(ent nractirihlP__ • Minimize oil compaction in landsca2ed areal and9.Qenspace. Chula Vista LCP Suggested Moditicatld~fS~Olution NO. 212-189 nng~5t a i, zol2 Page No. 187 Page ~~ Policy HM3.I;_In_Dlannin~,=itine_dcsirninr, constructing, and maintainingkrounds, ' landscapes andstructures_owned and-managed by the City _Silc objectives should indudc management and maiixenance practices_that.pceteet_and yn tanc _tl:•ttu?Lcc2systcm.. itv grounds designer ilcr• m tiage,~ LL'ws thc'r contractors should ^"ive nrior'ty l r A PracticjnE'_the princitlle of Ltlegrated Pe~L.Marmgement_inc(udin~the bodies wi[h_poor circulation oClide_p~ols, the RWOCB's municipal storm watcr_permit andlhel'/ater unlit S~ontrgJl?nJiey 1'or the Lgpl sed~};tYs undEstu;vics of alilit tr~fit. yigned statement accepline responsibility for all structural and treatment ernv roi BMP maintenance. until such_lime as ibe_proueity is tra tsfen~ed and ^nother ~y_takes responsibility,al tvhichJime the ne«~ owner utill be ~bligatcd to comply with_all pcrmit_conditiau, including o`t-~g water uglily ntaintenanee. Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 188 Chula Visla LCP Suggested Modifications n mast 2I, zo I z rage sa 60. On Pare III-C,S, the lirst paragraph under the heading 3. Natural Resources Management Plan (NRMP) shall be revised as follows: In recoenition ofthe sensitivity of the natural resources and the innxtnmtce of protection. restoration, manaecment and cnforcetncnt in orotcctin^_ those resources. the Port and Citv shall prepare a Natural Resow~ccs bt artaecment Plan 1NRiv1P1 for the Chuht Vista Davfront The NRMP will be desiened to •tchicve the Mana ~ci Obiectives (defined bclowl for the Wildlife Habilut Areas. '1'hc NRMP will be an adaptive mm~aeemenl ulan, reviewed and mnendcd as necessary by the District and City in coordination with the Wildlife Advisory Grotm. Because_ityvill be frequently LUP shall conu~ol and take~[ecedence. G I. On Page III-G5, Objective NR.I shall be revised as fnl lows: C)bieclive NX. l: :1 NRd"1P mill be ereu(ed crrt+ctmtfiti~atiddria-?lea, arrd will mee! Ibe munueenlcn! obiitclirev heluu. 62. On Page II I-67, the following new Objective shall be inserted after Policy NR3.6: 63. On Page I I I-C,8, Policy NR.4.n shall be revised as follows Policy NR 4 A Ucsienate "No Touch" 13u1Ter areas as dclined and dcecrihed in Exhibit 12a. Such areas will contain fencine desiened snecificnlly to additional insyectiQnS should oecur_afier~tQnns_as_negded throu;;lmul the rainy_scaaen.Repairs, nigdi6catienS~Qr_installatiuitofadditiona113M1's as needed shouLd_be cacrivd ~ut.prior to_th~ nextrainy season. Chula Vista I-C'P Suggcslcd MudilicafioeSOlutiOll NO. 2012-189 august 21, 20 i 3 Page No. 189 Paee 35 Iimit the movement of dotnesticated. feral. and t~tsisxne~ small predators (c e does cats skunks, opossums and other small Terrestrial ~mimals (cullectivcly. "Small Predators'll and humans between develo cd park ;md No Touch Butler Areas and Wildlife Habitat Areas 'I'hc fence will he a mininuun 6-foot hieh, black vinyl chain link fence or other statxbie gcts~ally effective barrier designed to take into censidcraSion public views of the bay_and thc_nced~4tect natural resources_and ensure wildlife_mobilitY_of lart;cr predatory that feed on small_orcdatorsH~err#1-t+ ' *N+~ F~F}Ra Pence desien may include appropriate locked access points for maintenanec and other necessary functions..Instal lotion of the fence will include land contouri m' to minimize vivual imp~ds of the I'rnce 64. On Page IIl-C,J, Policy NR.S.C shatll be revised ns follows I'olicv NR i CAII street and walkway liehtine eiieei~ shall be shielded to minimize x~ aloes. 65. On Paee III-(>R. Policy NR.S.D shall be revised as follows: I'olicv NR.S.U" _ -- -- 'All ~~ICrnal liehtine wt#shall be designed to minimiic am• impxl on Wildlife Iiabilal Areas, and operations and maintenance vfill shalLbe devised to ensure appropriate I +ne-term education and control of li ~hkt impacts. -Fo•tlac~naninterx+ ,~„~;,;-;~'~---o mbicnt lislit impacts to the Swccnvater or J Street Marshes will be minimized. 66. On Page I I I-70, Policy NR.R.B shall he revised us follows: 67. On Page 111-71, Policy NR.9.A shall be revised as follows: I olio NR 9 A "- --• '~ -. ~__. _ oK.tr6mH~tNd~mmml b~„;~~:;d~:nci•ch=tsat#xt~treasarmr~w'iatc~rrse~r-~rd'fgr . .._. .1 ..:..-_J .._.. 9rv~~ai^. SM~R 9~AMH duRh€ur~+erct~ Provisionsl'or access Cor non- destructive mainten:mce and removal of litter and excess sedimnn w4li s,1F all be inicerated into these facilities ht areas th;u provide for the ReSO1llYlOri N0. 2012-189 Chul^ Vista LCI' Suggeslcd Modifications Page No. 190 nagnst z I, zo I z Pace 36 nawnd treaunent of runoff, cattails. bulrush. nndefat. willow. and the like arc permissible. G8. On Page III-71, Policy NR.9,C is duplicative with Sue_esied Modification #55, Policy EM. LD 10, and shall be deleted as follows: Rf+7+er-R.Vi-9•C-~tt~-nwPe€~rfe~reiate+rt-txstieide~- `-~`' '---- ' rd~€lsett ,twins isrtc>-N~if~t+fi+-F4nbiYet,arnens-is•~te{tibite~- G9. On Page 111.72, the first paragraph of folic}' NR.I I.B shall be revised as follows: I'olicv NR.I I B The follotvine euidelines rFd sltall be followed when desiening lass and reflective surfaces in the Bavfront Develonmeitt. [...] 70. On Page III-73, the second bullet item under Policy NR. I I.C shall be revised as follows: I'oli_cy NR.I LC Buildings hci4h[s, massing and set-backs shall be dcsianed w minimize bird strikes • Desicn features that increase the potential for bird strikes. such as walkwavs constructed of clear class and "see throueh" pathwa,.y thruueh lobbies. rooms and con~idors. shall be avoided t~nthe-e~ae+~t fgxeibk except (s[lninor Ceatures irtended to enhance view o_oRC1[Simhies al_eradc Icvel and_atly when oriented awav from far ~e oRe^csRapfrci 71. On Page III-7J.. Policy NR.I I .P shall be revised as follp~es: consultation with the U.S.#~et>'tte++~w+N~4'1'ish and Wildlife Service and subiect to the approval of the Port or City, as appropriate dependins on iurisdiction. to monitor bird strikes which may occur durinc thefirst 12 months after the completion of consn'uction Within GO davs after completion oP[he moni[orins period. the uualified biologist shall submit a written report to the fort or the Citv. which shall state the biotoeist's findings and recommendations resardina am' bird strikes that occun-cd. Based on the findings of those reports, the Port or the Cilv, as appropriate dcpendinc nn iurisdiction, in coordination with the U. S. @entxtnmNt-e#~Fish and Wildlife Service, Chula Vista LCP Stiff+cstcd ModilicafionsOlution No. 2012-189 Anenst 21. 2olz Page No. 191 Page 37 will evaluate whether further action is required. which may include further monitorine or [cdcsi~f Structui;cs_for fuhirc_pha~es. 72. On Page I V-76, the first paragraph on the page under section IV. SUBAREA DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES, shall he reviscd as follows: In addition to the area wide objectives ;md plan provisions, this Land Use Plan provides site-speci lie development and design provisions that are unique to each of the eight Umee individual subareas within the local coastal zone. In lbe ev nt con flier the su11'+re•+ ar2vjSiun~shall Supersede area wide org_visions A summmv of the subareas and land uses identified within each subarea is provided in Table d-1. 73. On Page IV-89, Policy SAI.PP.I.B shall be reviscd as follows: 74. On Page IV-89, Policy SA LI'LD shall be delGCd as follows: ~~ n c.. F@~t3~Ff''iBtt•ltHt~fktwFtYtt{9"M'IHY~~~n'~nir~ 75. On Page I V-90, Policy SA LP.2 shall be revised as follows Ob%ectit~e S4 / P ?.Ari cheater Diclric! Public Parks shadrlahn!! be desierred hr rrrinimi_c innurcls on grlinccm wildlile arerac. 76. On Page I V-91, the following new paragraph shall be inscrled inunediately uticr 'T'able d-2: 1'he LLIP Policic~fgr Parcel Areas ?_I'_and ~h ;u-c_precise_nndmandatory Any, Iggposcd revisi4nitolhelimitations_oi? deyclgpment de5c[it)ed below,.jncluding prODOSCd uSeS,_ntasiniunl~quare footagrdensit};, building I,~eightS, building maS or required design features and elements,~l_I require an L P amendment. ROSOIUtIOri NO. 2012-189 Chula Vista LCP Suggested Modificatiau Page No. 192 Ansust z I, zo Iz Page 38 77. On Page I V-91, the first and second proposed paracraphs after "I-able 4-2 shall be rcvised as follows: Parccl Area 2-f is located just cast of the Chula Vista Marina in Subarea 2 (I'~hibit 71 'I'bis parcel area covers approsimatcly 23 acres. The existing land use is entirely undeveloped Proposed development of Parcel Area 2-f consists of mixttl residential with a m'+ximum of I SDU units and stpporline lncillmv retail uecs up to I S 000 scruare feet. Residential buildines rank from 4'to 19 stories and a masimuro of;12A 2Q0 feet in hei_•h[. Parccl Area 2-f zoned and e'ignated as R-A1 h1 will contain development blocks that will have individual building footori»IS and towers of vmvins hcishts. Off=street pnrking spaces +vill be provided for Pwcd Area ?-fin accordance with Policy A PK 1 for residences The required o~rkim• will be located in nm'kim• syuchmec both below- vrd above-grade Th ~'tbOVC-~•rade parkin, structures will be generally loaned in the center of the residential strucuires. generally surrounded and enclosed by the residential apd ancilla~ rdail uses in order ke minimize their visibility. Parcel Arca 2-h is located directly cast of Parccl Area 2-fin Subarea 2. i'hese two n'urel areas ~tre divided by the new road Street A Parcel Area ~-h is approsimatdv 30 acres. Lxisiing land use is indusyial.aith multiple buildines. I'rooosed development i~elndcw consists ~tf ollice. retail. and a hotel. This parcel arcs includes unto 42Q000 square feet (escludine structured parkinel of mixed use office and cununercialh~ctail use. and a 250-room hotel. The hotel is a m:ninuun pf 233 000 square feet Icxcluding structured parkins) with a maximum height of-43A 140 feet Parcel Area 2-h oft=street parkin4spaces will be provided in accordance with policy A.PK I for hotels and professional/office mace. The rcauired parking will be located in narking structures both abovo and below-grade. 'I'hc above-ende parkin- structures will be eenerdly located in the center of the commercial structures. surroun<Icd :md cncloscd by the office. retail and hotrl uses in order to minimize their visibility. 78.On Pagc I V-93, proposed Policy SA2.LU. LA shall be rcvised as follows: Chula Vista LCP Suggested ModihcaAD~olution No. 2012-189 nueusl z 1, zo 12 Page No. 193 Page 39 79. On Page I V-93, the following ne+r policies shall be inserted a0er proposed Policy SA2.LU. I .U: S0. On Page IV-93, Policy SA2.LU.LIi shall be revised as follows: Policv SAS LU I P New residential development +vilhin Parcel Area 2-f shall be subject m a?39 200-foot hci~_ht limit. , 8 L On Page I V-93, the following new policy shop he inserted alter proposed policy SAZ. LU. I . K: Policv SA2.LU.1: 1 _hi ordn_tu maintain c~liting vie+v corridors +vilhin the I~hu'bor Dist[ict_dcvcloptncnt oit_Parccl 2-f and 2_h_(trfer_lci Eshil2it Sal shaILl2~dcSlgned to meet the f~ILowin~tnt rd . I~evelonmcnt chap inc9l~GUC building s ~t-Ltackc an ste - acks to rcdSC thew',~u'tl i nnact~C bullS1j11stmassin<_, at d to further +viden the ublie view cotridar~et-backs anti terLbacks_ghall "marina walk;_;ds2brin~s~e_I2edes[rian intQlheiite. RCSOIUYIOri NO. 212-189 Chul::Vista LCI' Suggested Modifications Page No. 194 A agnst z I,. ?o I z Page 40 [zsult_in_a10_si'isle_mininuun_aublic view cun~idor width at [[odium level nnd2~svid~ minimuntpublic ~tiew_corridor width;[[ tower Ievcl. , • Rc~identialdcv loomcn on I'arc 12-f adjacent ~9 I Slrac s t II_bc setback 65 Icct from the curb. "I-his will enable an enhanced vu lie view corridor and public sVeet;zcn a or talc 'tad restaurant strccl~ealing, • Prop2sed_residen[ial_towerion_Pa[eel 2-f shall he s'ted to gt,~rlually stcRdy~nsvard_irthcigbLGtt~n north to sou(I>.r-cll~lg the m. re in en is~ve nrno sed and_uSe~ t ~ thc_nerth and_the ~t>wi ~utental preserve to the south, • The building set-bacti for [he_hQtel ort_Parecl 2_I>_at_bq~uud_le_vcl along J Strcct_kenvecn the L-~Corridpr and_A_St[cct_shall be 65 feet measured from the north curb of.l tree[. 'I'his_will re ult_in an ~uluutc~sikli. v~ icw c.Qrrisior 1_Tt1_mJntcrstatcS_._L1scc such us a otel ool will be aennitted in the set-back sn lone ac the public vi w t lh say_fr4in11tc_.L~trcct 1-5 Overaass is not inmc> mod- • TJIC pul2lic view con~idors identified in 13.vhibit a shall :d i,JLL~itlt the existing corridors_behveen the buildin~thal_are cunnntly located eastyt(~h ands ss>f I3~13 ulevurd [630 BaX Boulevar 660 Bw Bo levard and ti~ott 660 Bav Boulevard o the botch. Prom north o south. t es cxistine buildines arc currenth_occupied by_Pacific_I"rust Bank, Fresenius Medical CacC[JP_MOtor Saoris, andNational llnivcrsily Intuitive Innovations. A2. On Page IVA4, proposed Policy SA2.C?.B shall be revised as follows: restaurarns. reshvoms, acid other facilities. 83. On Page 1 V-94, proposed Policy SAZ.C2.C shall be revised as 1bllows: Policy SA2.C2.C To help intcarate all publicly accessible areas and provide convenience and low cost services for the eeneral public, the ;:round Fluor of the bore! development and associated outdoor areas slr€+ttld III comain a variety of pedestrian-oriented amenities, which may include rcasonabh~ priced restaurants. newspa~r sands. outdoor talcs with sit down and walkup service, Chula Vista LCP Suggested ModiRca[ib~isolution No. 2012-189 nnggsc ~ I, 20 l2 Page No. 195 Page 41 infonmtit pal 1'iosks nTMs public art or ci ft shops easily •tccessible to the public. 84. Oo Page IV-94, proposed Policy SA2.C2,C shall be revised as follows: Palicv SA2.P I A The intersections of $av Boulevard with "FI" Street, and "J" Street shall be primary entries into the t3av4onl These satewavs shall c ~nblish 'r memorable im'~ec for the [3avfi~ont Lundsc:me framine and architecnrral elements Rankine the entry IhaLpr4legLand cnhanc guhlic views to [he av shall reOcct the importance of these entrances. 8~. On Page IV-9f>, the second bullet under proposed Policy Sn2.E2 shall be revised as follows: Policti SAS F ~ As o'trt of its specif is residential buildine dcsiens focusine on the buiidin>~elevniona'don~ 1-Su'ect facine south and alone Marina P~rkww ftcim~ west. developers will ~...~ To the e~tcnt si~•nific~nt bird strike oolential remains notwithstandin>_ th ~ d •sien techniques described above. make a pod frith effort to investi~~ate and incorporate other econnmic311y feasible design end/or construction measures identi0ed is potenli'tl mitie'1[ion measures in the Final EIR such that bird strike impacts are considered mitie:tled Lnw1+e !?ortbntcf~6ita•. SG. On Pagc IV-97, OUlective Sn2.E.G shall be revised as follows: Uhiccli e SA ~ /- 6 Con ~+ rrir»+ +nd tier •I pmenl rfPcn-trls' Z-~mul 2-h a•{maJrl s(+ull be curefid(r uu+nnecd I t re luc ~ imnncts ha+u denm+erme nn ucliu ~mu wildlife huhiku. 87. On Page IV-97, Policy 53.C.L8 shall be revised as follows: Policv S3 C I U The l3ny~i oulevard ~tnd "J" Slt'eet entry shall be a nrintarv southern enirv into the B,v1Ymn This eitcwav shall nrovtde a memorable image of th • B•tyf}opt Landscape fmmine and architecuir~l elements flanking the entry that protec mt c rt c_e ~blic views of the av musl rc llec[ the importance of this entrance. RCSOIUtlOri NO. 212-1 $9 Chula Vista LCP Suggested Modifications Page No. 196 September 18, 2012 Page 42 8S. When the final LUP including all suggested modifiauions as adopted by the Cunvnission is prepared for final certification, any of the above new or revised politics may be rcfornm;ted and appropriately re-numbered if desired by the City, au long as they remain in thz same location within the LUP, and no revisions arz made to Lhe text, table, or exhibit i(self. 88.5.'1'he City of Chula Vista has requested that a series of administrative revisions to the LUI' be made to replace incorrect ro outdated references to agencies such as the Redevelopment Agency, canmittees, and/or applicable building officials. These revisions are shown on Fxhibi[ N I8, and arc hereby incorporttcd as suggested mod i Pcations. Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 197 Exhibits to be Replaced in Land Use Plan EXHBfT ~t0. T5 LUP Relacement Exhibits Chula Vista LCP #1-11 CVBMP LalMOmb Goasbl Cwnmicabn Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 198 a.~mo \ s~aroe Ocoart ` 0oimry Feet 0 3,200 6,400 12,600 79,200 25,600 LCP Planning Area Vista Bayfront Local Coastal Chula Vista, California Exhibit 1 Regional Location IN A, is ell , 5l, Hai b�= fv it ii ��a YI^��s i i• � fi�i `�y''= t'_ dal �4� 1Y�✓, r? INIM 4vsl(i" =jjE u n Resolution No. 2012-189 ~oi2-1 s9 No. 201 Resolution No. 2012-189 ~„ ,~ ~ ' ...:. ~~G,y ~ ' ~ ' ~1 ~ ~ g~ ` ~ ~~' ` t b i C r?~ „~ p ~t y4r c p ~ `~ , F p ~`Y~`~ ~~ 7.~4,?.. ~ ~~~ i+? ~ ~r~rf~-""~Mt ~~.~_ [ ~' g1b ~ '~ g S 1 ~ ^' f ~ >~4-;p ~~ ' ` `` ` a " 4 w p A; ~ .~ Y~` ~ ~ ' l i _ ., ~ , ~ . q. ~ ~ ~' ~ ~~ ~'Y ~Y t ~~ t t i~ a ~.fi'E3Yte/ 'F~LL~Mit~C'i ul e Wat ` ~y ~ ~ ' t e ~iY v ~~ 9 _ /~ \ ~ ~' ., w Jy ~ + ~ I ` F ~ l . o ~y Na~b 1 ~.~~ ~' c J ~~e r7 I .~ t ;~~ i ~~ ~ -.,, .. s ~ ~y~ ~l \~~' ~l~p~ ~ -, ~ s f ~ y 1e 3 ' c ~ 1! ~ ~~ a ~; ~ t t , ` ~-- r- ` ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ Sob p s y !~ Y t'- O ~' ' ~ I~ t ~i '~ ~~~ g`' ~ 1 :' i to N ~ F 1. >~ ~ K~ 4 ~p ~ -%ti - -- e i~„ "'1d- i ~ - Vila em~6nn1 Local Coastal Plan Exhibit 5 Land Exchange 2012-189 e No. 203 Resolution No. 2012-189 2012-189 No. 205 /~ toy :-. ® Commercial -Professional antl Administrative Commercial -Thorouflhfare Commercial -Visitor - Industrial -General -Industrial - Limited Industrial -Research and Limited `_j Open Space ~~ Public- Quasi-Public Parks and Recreation j ResitlenGal in Harbor - Railroad Easement Project Roads Nota: Areas b the LCP Planning Area rrol itlentdied Cy zoning wtegorfes are classllied a5 "Cirwlation and o sin uoo zzoo a.azs a,ooo LCP PlanNnB Area city at cwla vista ~ as hoot Master Plan Retlevelopmenl Area (_ ~ Y :hula Vista 8aylranl Local Coastal Plan _ Chula vista, California Exhibit 8 Land Use Map Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 206 Hotel I Residential l /:_. - t-4O-4A _ ,-"=-4-(`S;;S3=3~~A= i _ ="q~I=~;_-~ t ~~ U~0o4Q~ ~~v`~~ I i I ..... I //~ Sao' 3 ~~/ 80~ 70' i / I ~~ - f ~~ I ~ / 40' // 45' /% I ' ~~'160' I i .. --_,. I %~ - ---._.i.. i -` .. 90' ~ 4Q I ~ I I _ I I _ ~~ l I I ~,, 1-iD-AB~ liQ'9E{ -_ ~' I _ ;; I s 106' ~/ ...... ..........Z%~% 70' - 95' View Corridor 65' Setback from Curb Commercial /Office ~~~ Podiums Towers Row Houses Land Exchange Development -Cross Section 1 Parcel 2-f ~, ~ / , , _, ~. ~~~ I ~~ I Parcel2-h ' I ~: /~ :! i n J/ / ~ J W S~N E CAula Ysla eaylmnt Local Coailal Plan CAVIa Yrsla, Cafdomia Exhibit 8a ~~~w~ Resolution No. 2012-189 Page No. 207 I. __ HD 4fi ~ET1'3"~ -=~~ ~~kfls ~ HEM-1~c= d-~tl r ~ ~s~~~'45'x,X ;I ~~^;%,46,~'>x}~ ~~i'x%%' ~..:1; ,45~"t_~`~' I, ; ~~ l~ , ~ ~`~ HII 4B~ ~ ~~ ~ 4 L \ ~ 1' i` ~ ~ ~ v~ ~ 1 i I Ills ~ ~: i~i ' ( ~/~ l il1~l // j 14U J i i ~r. i 3B-` ``` ® Podiums Towers Row Houses / r ...., ~r ~ 1 ` "'; ~ /I /I "j Parcel2-h i /If I ~- ~' I Land Exchange Development -Cross Section 2 i%~/. ;190'j~~~ ~~ I; I { l~ ~~,~ I Parcel2-f ljl~ I j%%%~~200'~ I~ I! I ~~./~ ,J I BO~ I' J I ~.,~~ ..1 ''' ~ HO`i1~ ~ l pW 5~ N VE Chula Nsta Bayfroat ~orol r.08aiel Plan Chula Ysm, Ca1,ldnk Exhibit 8b LW Usv Pbn Resolution No. 2012-189 2012-189 e No. 209 i ~,.,,.,! taa~ v~~y.~ ~ ~~ ~ h ,~. '- /•_ ~~ f t r ~~ - ,~ _' a '. •,~ ~~, ~ ~ ` ~ ~~~ ~` _ _~, ea 1L LSLLt ' Sad aas Vr / ¢a~~a` _ Sw ' ~ A`':i'~ ' /-~- ~ , „'~ >jr rl~-r lu s' J` A.. \~-~'~ fi'.~w z -'-~- Pedestrian Circulation Inside LCP Pedestrian Circulation Outside LCP - Project Roads Inside LCP Project Roads Outside LCP i -red Cnula Vista Bay'mnl Local Goesfal Plan ~ soo szoo cn~la vz:a,call'omia o sso i aoo z soo ~, LGP Planning Area Gity d Chula Vsta Exhibit 9b Circulation Map - , Pedestrian Network Resolution No. 2012-189 Resolution No. 2012-189 wee No. 211 .'': --•, `~ .. Feel - Chula YSta 6ayrcom local coasai r~a~ o B00 100D 3600 5,000 x.200 Ghule Vista, Galilorrva LCP Planning Nea ~ EXhIbIY 10 Famaohiteaaal edge ~n Uews Maio cataways Form and.4ppe2rance Map - Project Roads ~~ Ciry o1 Chula Vista ~ •a Resolution No. 2012-189 ~a ~ < ~ ~'; ~,+ , r ,~ ,~; f ~ l"~,~~ s ~ ' 1`~ r ~'+' + s t ~1~, - '~ ';. ~+ -_~ ~~ i ~, `~ ;..~ ;, . ~:~ . ,. Water Line Inside LCP- ~«__~ Water Line Outside LCP o Water Connections to Existing Systems •-•-~- Sewer Line Inside LCP --~--- Sewer line Outside LCP o Sewer Connection to Existing Systems = Project Roads Inside LCP Project Roads Outside LCP - rK+ cn~~a v,ria o sso +:oo zsoo a?eo s,zoo cr. Exhibit 11 LCP Planning Area Ciry o/ Chula Visa Utility Systems Map 1 ~~ ~~ P,:_ ®h 'oucM1 BVHa _ °n ooahwEt~.weetwzler olsedn nlW hradtM1S<Parcel * ,~ I 4 ~t ~min ldOhwld~M1 OtzV D'neritl f~A-N'SF' 6' ~ y Limited Use Boger G ~y I : .miniW hwitlN ___ ~ ~manshional Use Buller _ 1 inlwfi:dt~ . Promer:ad. ~^ t / I teat o sw +~m z?ro ?~ a'ro LCP Pinning Aree ~ ppen Space City of Chula Vista ® ~' Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas (USPWS) Potential Environmentally Sensitive Habita[Areas .~.....~.......r e+r......,,~~..m..e...o-=.e~.. Resolution No. 2 Local Coastal Pian Exhibit 12a Environmental Management Map Resolution No. 2012-] 89 Resolution No. 2012-189 ---t-~r=~'!:` ee No. 215 "~;>~ 'f ,..t FeN 0 650 1,300 3600 3900 5,300 ~LCP Planning Area Rait Road Easement ®LCP Parcel Areas VJthin the CVBMP Ciry of Chula Vista tIR-s CVBMP Parcel Areas Within the LGP --.Chula Vista Bayfront Master Plan 'L. _~ R etlevelopme nl Area (CVBMP) ---- CVBMP Parcels o Project Roads Vista eayfront Local Coastal Chula Vista, California Exhibit 13 LCP and CVBMP ROW HOUSES ADJACENT TO MARINA WALK CAFE ON PEDESTRIAN PLAZA 1 STREET GATEWAY PARK MA0.1NA i -_ f ~~-~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~f • ~ ~ MARINA R WAY ~' ~~4 ~~ ~ i ~ r i-r= ~'~ v ~-Y-- ,, ~ •a v ~~}, ~' ~ ~~' i ~ ^ ~ NOTEL ' u\ ~ ~•' ~- ~ ( ~"Iti ,i ~ { , MARINA WALK WOONERF WALK GARDEN WALK PUBLIC PLAZAS WITH PUBLIC ART G WATER FEATURES ®Potential Location of Required Retail Nodes Chula Vista Bayfront Lowl Coastal Plan Chula Vista, California Land Exchange Illustrative Plen ~~~ ~~{~~ ~ j ~fI k t~+jt~,.iR ~r`~ v,~~~ s ~. 1 OFFICE ~ ~~~ -. OFFICE • i ~ ~f~' N~ H' WAt ~ ~, • ~ H ~r Exhibit 14 N O_ G rr O z O N O_ N 00