HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012/03/27 Item 06CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA STATEMENT
~~~ CITY OF
CHULA VISTA
3/27/12, Item
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING ON CHULA VISTA'S PORTION OF THE 2012
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE TRANSNET LOCAL STREET
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL
YEARS 2012/2013 THROUGH 2016/2017 FOR INCLUSION IN
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM, PROVIDING THE CERTIFICATION AND
INDEMNITY STATEMENTS NECESSARY TO OBTAIN
TRANSNET FUNDS AND PROGRAMMING $535,873 IN FUNDS
FROM COMPLETED PROJECTS
SUBMITTED BY: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
ASSISTANT DIRECTO OF ENG
REVIEWED BY: CITY MANAGER
ASSISTANT CIT ANAGER S~
4/STHS VOTE: YES ^ NO
SUMMARY
State and Federal regulations require the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) to
develop and adopt a Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) every two years in
order to continue receiving Federal and State funding. All projects that the City of Chula Vista
proposes to fund with Transnet funds must be included in the RTIP, as well as projects that are
funded with Federal or State transportation funds.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed activity, consisting of
approval to submit a funding request for various Transnet Projects to SANDAG, for compliance
with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is
not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Therefore,
pursuant to Section 15060 (c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to
CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is necessary at this time. Although environmental review
is not necessary at this time, once the scope of the individual projects proposed to be funded have
been more specifically defined, environmental review will be required for each project and the
appropriate environmental determination will be made.
6-1
3/27/12, Item ~O
Page 2 of 7
RECOMMENDATION
Council conduct the public hearing and adopt the resolution.
BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Not applicable.
DISCUSSION
Transnet History and Regulations
The voters of San Diego County approved the Transnet Program as Proposition A in November
1987. This proposition enacted ahalf--cent increase in the countywide sales tax through 2008 to
fund specified transportation programs and projects. One third of the revenues generated by the
tax were allocated by SANDAG to the local agencies for local streets and roads purposes. These
funds have been distributed to cities annually and programmed by cities into local projects.
In November 2004, 67 percent of County voters supported Proposition A, which extends
Transnet from 2008 to 2048. The Transnet Extension Ordinance states that at least 70 percent of
the funds allocated to local agencies for local road projects should be used to fund construction
of new or expanded facilities, major rehabilitation and reconstruction of roadways, traffic
signalization, transportation infrastructure to support smart growth, capital improvements for
transit facilities, and operating support for local shuttle and circulator transit routes (Congestion
Relief). No more than 30 percent of Transnet funds allocated to local agencies for local road
projects are expected to be used for local street and road maintenance.
The SANDAG Board has subsequently adopted guidelines implementing this policy (Attachment
1). The Maintenance and Non-Congestion Relief category includes maintenance activities such
as pothole repair, seals, traffic signal and lamp replacement, roadway signing and striping, minor
drainage improvements and overlays less than one-inch thick. The Congestion Relief category
includes roadway and bridge widening, pavement reconstruction and overlays one-inch thick or
greater, new sidewalks and roadway drainage improvements for the purpose of reducing
significant and frequent roadway flooding. This category also includes various traffic operations
improvements, such as traffic signal coordination and interconnection, traffic signal upgrades,
video surveillance and data collection for performance monitoring purposes. Certain
improvements, such as traffic calming measures, pedestrian ramps, street buffer areas (such as
landscaped strips), bus stop enhancements and pedestrian traffic signals, are included in the 70
percent category if they are in SANDAG-designated Smart Growth areas.
Projects included under the Congestion Relief portion of Transnet aze required to accommodate
travel by pedestrians and bicyclists in accordance with the Transnet Ordinance and Rule 20 of
SANDAG Board Policy 31, "Accommodation of Bicyclists and Pedestrians". This rule states
that evaluating bicycle and pedestrian accommodation is required for all major reconstruction
projects included under Congestion Relief under the 70-30 requirement. Cities may use a
bicycle or pedestrian master plan adopted by the city council and approved by SANDAG within
the last five years to determine the appropriate means of accommodating bicyclists and
pedestrians in a given project. Since Chula Vista's Bikeway Master Plan Update was adopted by
6-2
3/27/12, Item ~i
Page 3 of 7
the City Council on February I, 2011 and the Pedestrian Master Plan was adopted on June 22,
2010, they qualify under this provision.
The 2010 RTIP was last amended by Council on February 28, 2012 by Resolution 2012-030
(Attachment 2). The purpose of this amendment was to enact four minor changes to the 2010
RTIP that would take effect as soon as possible. This included the addition of new locations to
CHV48 (Major Pavement Rehabilitation) and CHV50 (Emergency Storm Drain Repair) and a
refund to SANDAG of $16,175 in TransNet Bicycle funds that had been allocated to an
ineligible project. Additionally, the description under CHV39 (Traffic Signal Systems
Optimization) was amended in order to include payment for the Regional Arterial Management
System (RAMS).
Proposed 2012 RTIP
SANDAG's letter dated January 27, 2012 provided the schedule for the 2012 RTIP. Agencies
are required to submit their proposed projects to SANDAG for inclusion in the 2012 Regional
Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) by April 6, 2012. The 2012 RTIP will cover five
fiscal years from Fiscal Year 2012-13 through Fiscal Year 2016-17. The SANDAG Boazd of
Directors is scheduled to adopt the final 2012 RTIP on September 28, 2012, with Federal
adoption predicted to occur in mid-December, 2012.
Chula Vista's share of the FY2013 allocation is estimated to be $4,700,000, with a total
estimated revenue of $26,152,000 for the five yeazs ending with FY2017. This is an increase of
approximately $2.9 million over the last five year estimate prepared by SANDAG in February
2011. Additionally, the new Chula Vista estimate of $4,497,000 for FY2012 is $150,000 over
the original estimate. This amount has been added to the FY2013 amount, for a combined total
of $3,395,000 for Congestion Relief (CR) projects and $1,455,000 for Maintenance (M).
Chula Vista's proposed allocation for the 2012 RTIP is shown on the table, TransNet Allocations
FY 2013 through FY 2017 (Attachment 3). These projects will be incorporated into the Fiscal
Year 2012-13 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
The following new projects are proposed to be added to the 2012 RTIP
1. Safe Routes to School FundinE Match
On March 13, 2012, Council approved the submittal of a grant application from the State
Safe Routes to School (SR2S) for funding of pedestrian safety improvements in the
vicinity of Castle Park Middle School ($798,900) and Hazel Goes Cook Elementary
School ($434,200) (Attachment 4). These projects would include the construction of
missing sidewalk along Quintard Street, bulb-outs and raised medians, crosswalks and
pedestrian ramps, traffic signal modifications and safety educational activities at the
schools. If these grants aze approved, a total of $398,600 in matching funds will be
needed, including $349,100 for Castle Pazk and $49,500 for Hazel Goes Cook. These
funds will be allocated to RTIP Project CHV33 School Zone Traffic Calming.
2. Alpine Avenue Sidewalks (CHV581
As part of the Castle Park Improvement Program, curb, gutter and sidewalks and street
improvements have been constructed along various streets in the Castle Park section of
6-3
3/27/12, Item
Page 4 of 7
the Montgomery area. Property owners have contributed a portion of the cost through the
formation of assessment districts. One of the last districts to be established is on Alpine
Avenue between Emerson Street and Oxford Street. Since funds from the Section 108
loan used to finance this program are running out, it is requested that $300,000 be
allocated from TransNet. Section 108 funds will be used first.
3. Industrial Blvd./ Anita Street Intersection Improvements (CHV60)
SANDAG will be widening the rail crossing at Anita Street east of Industrial Blvd. Due
to this construction, the City will need to widen Industrial Blvd. along the west side to
approximately 100 feet north of Anita Street and relocate the existing traffic signal.
Associated work to be funded by the City includes construction of bike lanes, traffic
signal upgrade, pedestrian improvements on the west side and drainage work needed to
construct the additional roadway. All work will be within existing City right-of--way. It
is projected that construction will take place in Fiscal Year 2013-14. $200,000 will be
allocated to this project from TransNet in Fiscal Year 2013-14.
4. Heritage Road (CHV-NEW)
In order to serve new development in southeast Chula Vista, Heritage Road will need to
be extended from Main Street north to Olympic Blvd (STM374). This project was
included in the 2005 Transportation Development Impact Fee revision. Anew six-lane
prime arterial is needed, with an estimated cost of $20,649,250. This project needs to be
included in the RTIP; however, no TransNet funds will currently be added. $150,000 in
TDIF funds will be included in the project for Fiscal Year 2012-13.
Additionally, the following are the major ongoing projects that are proposed to receive additional
funding allocations through this amendment:
Traffic Engineering Programs: These projects relate to several ongoing City programs
related to maintaining compliance with City threshold standards, traffic monitoring and
safety improvements. Proposed Transnet funding and CIP projects include the following:
a. CHV45 -Traffic Monitoring (STL274, TF321, TF325): $70,000 per year
b. CHV43 -Congestion Relief (TF354): $30,000 in FY13, estimated $75,000 per
year subsequently.
c. CHV35 - Traffic Signing and Striping (TF332) (STM369), Studies and
Signal/Streetlight Upgrade (TF366): $140,000 in FY13, estimated $150,000 per
year subsequently.
d. CHV33 -Traffic Calming Program (TF345): $50,000 per year beginning in
FY14.
e. CHV34 -Neighborhood Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Program (TF327): $20,000
in FY13; $50,000 in subsequent years.
£ CHV39 -Traffic Signal System Optimization (TF350): $100,000 per year.
2. Traffic Signals (CHV601: Traffic signals will be installed at the two intersections of
Industrial Blvd./ Moss Street and at Industrial Blvd./ Naples Street as a joint project with
SANDAG due to requirements from the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC)
on upgrades that SANDAG would like to make to the rail crossings. The City's share of
6-4
3/27/12, Item~_
Page 5 of 7
this funding is $250,000, but it will not be needed until Fiscal. Year 2013-14. An
additional $250,000 will be allocated for traffic signal modifications at Third Avenue and
Naples Street.
3. Pavement Maior Rehabilitation (CHV48): This includes the portion of the Pavement
Rehabilitation Program that includes overlays (one-inch and greater) and reconstruction.
Compliance with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) is required. The City has
revised this street list (Attachment 5), previously included as a part of the 2010 RTIP
Amendment approved by Council in March 201 I. This list will be used for the Transnet-
funded Pavement Major Rehabilitation program. A total of $2,665,000 in TransNet
funds should be available in FY13. Subsequent years' allocations are estimated.
4. Other Existin¢ Proiects: The following are other existing projects that have proposed
allocations:
a. CHV22 -Advance Planning Studies (OP202): $47,000 to $57,000 from FY13 to
FY17
b. CHV50 -Emergency Storm Drain Repair: The allocation is proposed to be
$850,000 in Fiscal Yeaz 2012-13, with $600,000 from current funds and $250,000
from reallocated funds (see below). These funds will be used for rehabilitation of
deteriorated and failed Corrugated Metal Pipe (CMP) that are used to transport
storm water from public roadways. This list has been expanded to include
additional priority projects (Attachment 6).
c. CHV06 -Pavement Management System (OP219): An additional $150,000 will
be allocated to expand the City's pavement management efforts, including
additional inspection and analysis.
Reallocation of Existing Funds
TransNet funds in the amount of $535,873 need to be reallocated to new and existing projects
from several completed projects. These projects include the following:
CHV 19 -North Broadway Reconstruction (STM354): $526,441
CHV42 -Major Intersection Safety (TF353): $6,498
CHV55 -Castle Park Improvements (STL342 only): $2,934 (reimbursement from Sweetwater
Authority)
Since the funds from CHV 19 and CHV42 are from Old TransNet funds (prior to Fiscal Year
2008-09), there are no restrictions on their allocation to any TransNet-eligible project. The funds
from CHV55 were originally from the Congestion Relief portion of the TransNet allocation, so
they need to be used on a Congestion Relief project.
These funds will be used as follows:
• CHV 18 -Fourth Avenue Sidewalk Improvements (STL291): $25,000 (Congestion
Relief)
• CHV33 -Enhanced Traffic Calming Crosswalk Improvements at the Vicinity of
Montgomery Elementary School (STL375): $80,000 (Congestion Relief)
• CHV08 -Willow Street Bridge (Traffic Signal Design): $75,000 (Congestion Relief)
6-5
3/27/12, Item
Page 6 of 7
• CHV59 -Sidewalk Installation along Naples Street (STL365): $90,000 (Congestion
Relief)
• CHV50 -Emergency Storm Drain Repair: $250,000 (Maintenance)
• CHV22-CIP Management (OP208): $15,873 (Maintenance)
Staff has evaluated all the projects for compliance with the bicycle and pedestrian regulations.
Some of the streets included in the list for CHV48 were already reviewed for compliance for the
2010 RTIP amendments, so they do not need to be reconsidered. The inclusion of new sidewalks
along Alpine Avenue will improve the current pedestrian accommodations. All projects are in
compliance with the City's 2011 Bikeway Master Plan. There is only one project that will need
a pedestrian exclusion, and that is the Anita Street/ Industrial Blvd. Improvements. Bikeways
will be provided on Industrial Blvd. along the project route, and sidewalks will be provided on
the west side of Industrial Blvd. The only pedestrian exclusion will be along the east side of
Industrial Blvd. The City is asking for an exclusion for the following reasons:
• The City will not be extending the roadway width along the east side of Industrial Blvd.
• The City is constructing the project as a result of an adjacent project constructed by
SANDAG.
• It would be more effective to provide a sidewalk that will extend from Anita Street to
the next intersection, not just from Anita Street to 100 feet to the north. Such a
sidewalk would be a "sidewalk to nowhere" and would not provide any additional
access.
The TransNet Extension Ordinance also requires per the Regional Transportation Congestion
Improvement Program (RTCIP) that the City collect from the private sector a minimum of $2000
per new residential unit (EDU), effective July 1, 2008, with annual escalation of not less than 2
percent based on the ENR (or similar) Construction Cost Index. These exactions are to pay for
the proportional share of funding to improve the Regional Arterial System (RAS). The
minimum amount for the RAS is $2123 for Fiscal Year 2011-12 and will increase by 2 percent to
$2165 for Fiscal Year 2012-13. Low to moderate income housing units are exempt. The City's
Transportation Development Impact Fee has been in place since 1988 for the area of the City
east of I-805. On March 18, 2008 Council enacted the Western Chula Vista Transportation .
Development Impact Fee (WTDIF) at the rate of $3243 per EDU. The City is in compliance
with these requirements. The WTDIF began to be collected as of May 19, 2008. The TDIF also
complies, even though it was enacted before the new TransNet legislation was adopted.
DECISION MAKER CONFLICT
For On¢oing Projects #3 and #4b: Pursuant to California Code of Regulations Section
18704.2 (b)(2), there is no material effect on any economic interests in real property as the
"decision solely concerns repairs, replacement, or maintenance of existing streets, water, sewer,
storm drainage or similar facilities."
For Fourth Avenue Sidewalk Improvements: Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated
by this action and has found that a conflict exists, in that Councilmember Ramirez has property
holdings within 500 feet of the property which is the subject of this action.
6-6
3/27/12, Item
Page 7 of 7
For All Other Projects: Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council and has
found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the properties which are the
subject of this action.
CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT
These actions will have no impact on the General Fund. However, approval of this resolution
will result in an allocation of $4,850,000 in TransNet funds during Fiscal Year 2012-13 and a
reallocation of $535,873 in existing TransNet funds. These allocations will be included in the
Fiscal Year 2012-13 Capital Improvement Program.
ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT
None.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Accommodation of Bicyclists and Pedestrians
2. Resolution 2012-030
3. TransNet Allocations
4. Resolution 2012 - 042
5. Revised Street List for CHV48
6. CMP Priority List
Prepared by: Elizabeth Chopp, Senior Civil Engineer, Engineering Dept.
J:\Engineer\AGENDA\CAS2012\03-27-12\RTIP 2012FINAL.doc
6-~
Attachment 1
TransNet Local Street and Road Program
TransNet Ordinance and Expenditure Plan Implementation Guidelines
June 23, 2006
The TransNet Ordinance requires that at least 70 percent of the revenues provided for local street
and road purposes should be used to fund direct expenditures for facilities contributing to
congestion relief. No more than 30 percent of these funds should be used for local street and road
maintenance purposes. The required multi-year Regional Transportation Improvement Program
(RTIP) project lists submitted by local agencies that are found to be out of compliance with this
requirement will not be approved. Local agencies may request an exception to this requirement and
must providejustification for such a request as part of its project list submittal.
The following table categorizes and lists the more typical types of facilities that are considered to
contribute to congestion relief. For other facilities not listed, it must be demonstrated that
congestion relief can be obtained before the project can be considered part of the 70 percent
Congestion Relief category. Maintenance costs of items listed in the 70 percent Congestion Relief
category are eligible under the 30 percent category. Facilities that are not considered to contribute
to congestion relief (Items 28-30) are eligible under the 30 percent category.
Congestion Relief
(At least 70%)
New or Expanded Facilities
1. New roadways and bridges
2. Roadway and bridge widening
3. Roadway widening for bike lanes
Maintenance and Non•Congestion Relief
(No more than 30%)
Lane removal for bike lanes
Major Rehabilitation and Reconstruction
4. Roadway rehabilitation (grinding and overlay, or
new structural pavement, or new overlay 1-inch
thick or greater)
• Pavement overlay (less than 1 inch)
Pot hole repair, chip seal, fog seal, crack
seal (except when part of roadway
rehabilitation project)
5. Roadway realignment
6. Bridge retrofit or replacement
7. Roadway drainage improvements for the purpose
of improving capacity-impeding conditions such as
significant and frequent roadway flooding
8. New sidewalk or sidewalk widening
• Roadway realignment that does not
increase roadway capacity
Bridge replacement for aesthetic purposes
Minor drainage improvements not part of a
congestion relief project
Traffic Operations
9. Median installation for safety improvement or left-
turn movement
• Stand alone landscaping project of an
existing median
10. New traffic signal, passive permissive left turn • Traffic signal replacement, bulb
(PPLT) installation, signal removal far congestion replacement, hardware, software, inductive
relief reasons, traffic signal upgrades, intersection loop repair
lighting
~~. Traffic signal coordination
12. Traffic signal interconnection
3
6-8
Congestion Relief
(At least 70%)
13. Centrally controlled traffic signal optimization
system
~ 4. Traffic surveillance or detection system (video)
15. Traffic data collection system for performance
monitoring purposes (in pavement detection,
radar)
Smart Growth-Related Infrastructure•
16. Traffic calming measures
17. Pedestrian ramps
18. Pedestrian traffic signal activation
19. Pedestrian crossings/overcrossings
20. Buffer area between sidewalk and street
21. Pedestrian roadway lighting
Transit Facilities
22. New bus stops
23. Bus stop enhancements
24. Bus-only lanes
Maintenance and Non-Congestion Relief
(No more than 30%)
Light bulb replacement
Bus-only lanes that do not provide
congestion relief
25. Queue jumper lanes for buses
26. Traffic signal priority measures for buses
27. Transit operational costs for shuttle and circulator
routes
Non-Congestion Relief
28. Erosion control (unless required as part of
a congestion relief project)
29. Landscaping (unless required as part of a
congestion relief project)
30. Roadway signing and delineation (unless it
is a congestion relief project)
Note: Staff costs for congestion relief project development (environmental, preliminary
engineering, design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction management) are eligible
expenditures under the 70 percent category. Staff costs for transportation infrastructure
maintenance or traffic operations efforts are eligible under the 30 percent category. Costs for
general TransNet fund administration and transportation planning are eligible up to 1 percent of
annual revenues.
" Toreceive credit For providing congestion relief under [he 70 percent category, smart growth-related infrastructure must
be provided in one of the existing or planned (not potential) seven Regional Comprehensive Plan smart growth land use
type characteristic areas: Metropolitan Center, Urban Center, Town Center, Community Center, Transit Corridor, Special
Use Center, or Rural Community. Smart growth-related infrastructure built outside of one of the seven types of
characteristic areas is eligible under the 30 percent category.
4
6-9
AT7A~'`~MEIJT ~
RESOLUTION NO.2012-030
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE TRANSNET LOCAL
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FOR
FISCAL YEARS 2010/2011 THROUGH 2014/2015,
PROVIDING THE CERTIFICATION AND INDEMNITY
STATEMENTS NECESSARY TO OBTAIN TRANSNET
FUNDS, AND APPROPRIATING $16,175 AND RELATED
INTEREST IN THE TRANSNET FUND
WHEREAS, on November 4, 2004, the voters of San Diego County approved the San
Diego Transportation Improvement Program Ordinance and Expenditure Plan (TransNet
Extension Ordinance); and
WHEREAS, the TransNet Extension Ordinance provides that SANDAG, acting as the
Regional Transportation Commission, shall approve amulti-yeaz program of projects submitted
by local jurisdictions identifying those transportation projects eligible to use transportation sales
tax (TransNet) funds; and
WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista was provided with an estimate of annual TransNet
local street improvement revenues for Fiscal Years 2013 through 2017; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends amending the Regional Transportation Improvement
Program (RTIP) as follows:
1. Add the segment of Brandywine Avenue from Point La Jolla to Mendocino Drive in
project CHV48; and
2. Amend Transnet project CHV39, Traffic. Signal Systems Optimization, to include the
Regional Arterial Management System (RAMS).
3. Amend CHV50, Emergency Storm Drain Repair, to add F Street east of Woodlawn
Avenue, due to failure of existing corrugated metal pipe, and other urgent locations needed to
maintain safe travel conditions.
WHEREAS, $16,175 in Transnet Bicycle funds were transferred to an ineligible project,
STM361, I-5 Multi-modal Corridor Analysis, and must be returned to SANDAG with all related
interest. An appropriation to the expense category of the Transnet fund of $16,175 and related
interest will be necessary to accomplish this; and
WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista has held a noticed public meeting with an agenda
item that cleazly identified the proposed list of projects prior to approval of the projects by its
authorized legislative body in accordance with Section 5(A) of the TransNet Extension
Ordinance and Rule 7 of SANDAG Board Policy No. 3 L
6-10
Resolution No. 2012-030
Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that pursuant to Section 2(C)(1) of the
TransNet Extension Ordinance, the City of Chula Vista certifies that no more than 30 percent of
its annual revenues shall be spent on maintenance-related projects.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that pursuant to Section 4(E)(3) of the TransNet
Extension Ordinance, the City of Chula Vista certifies that all new projects, or major
reconstruction projects, funded by TransNet revenues shall accommodate travel by pedestrians
and bicyclists, and that any exception to this requirement permitted under the Ordinance and
proposed shall be cleazly noticed as part of the City of Chula Vista's public hearing process.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that pursuant to Section 8 of the TransNet Extension
Ordinance, the City of Chula Vista certifies that the required minimum annual level of local
discretionary fends to be expended for street and road purposes will be met throughout the 5-
yeaz period consistent with the most recent Maintenance of Effort Requirements adopted by
SANDAG.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that pursuant to Section 9A of the TransNet Extension
Ordinance, the City of Chula Vista certifies that it will extract $2,000, plus all applicable annual
increases, from the private sector for each newly constructed residential housing unit in that
jurisdiction to comply with the provisions of the Regional Transportation Congestion
Improvement Program (RTCIP).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that pursuant to Section 13 of the TransNet Extension
Ordinance, the Ciry of Chula Vista certifies that it has established a sepazate Transportation
Improvement Account for TransNet revenues with interest earned expended only for those
purposes for which the funds were allocated.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that pursuant to Section 18 of the TransNet Extension
Ordinance, the City of Chula Vista certifies that each project of $250,000 or more will be cleazly
designated during construction with TransNet project funding identification signs.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Chula Vista does hereby certify that all
other applicable provisions of the TransNet Extension Ordinance and SANDAG Boazd Policy
No. 31 have been met.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Chula Vista agrees to indemnify, hold
harmless, and defend SANDAG, the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission,
and all officers and employees thereof against all causes of action or claims related to City of
Chula Vista's TransNet funded projects.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista adopts
the Transnet Local Street Improvement Program of Projects for Fiscal Years 2011/2012 through
2014/2015 and amends it as follows:
1. Adds the segment of Brandywine Avenue from Point La Jolla to Mendocino Drive in
project CHV48; and
6-11
Resolution No. 2012-030
Page 3
2. Adds Regional Arterial Management System (RAMS) to Transnet project CHV39,
Traffic Signal Systems Optimization; and
3. Adds emergency repairs to storm drains at F Street east of Woodlawn Avenue, due to
failure of existing corrugated metal pipe, and other urgent locations needed to maintain safe
travel conditions to CHV50, Emergency Storm Drain Repair; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City Of Chula Vista
appropriates $16,175 in Transnet Bicycle funds that were transferred to an ineligible project,
STM361, I-5 Multi-modal Corridor Analysis, including all related interest to the expense
category of the Transnet fund to return to SANDAG.
Presented by Approved as to form by
r
/~___. % T
~ / ~~ ~ U
Richa d A. He tins Glen R. ogins,
Director of)~ blic Works eY \ ~
6-12
Resolution No. 2012-030
Page 4
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista,
California, this 28th day of February 2012 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers: Aguilaz, Bensoussan, Castaneda, Ramirez and Cox
NAYS: Councilmembers: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers: None
Cheryl Cox, yor
ATTEST:
~~~~~~
Donna R. Norns, CMC, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
I, Donna R. Norris, City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 2012-030 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a
regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 28th day of February 2012.
Executed this 28th day of February 2012.
Gtr ~
Donna R. Norris, C C, City Clerk
6-13
ATTACHMENT 3
TRANSNET ALLOCATION - FY 2013 THROUGH FY 2017
Estimated Annual Allocation $4,700,000 $4,951,000 $5,230,000 $5,503,000 $5,768,000
Allocation+PreviousYearRemainder $4,850,000 $4,951,000 $5,230,000 $5,503,000 $5,765,000
Major Pavement Rehabilitation (Overlays) CHV48 $2,665,000 $2,910,000 $3,560,000 $3,760,000 $3,910,000
Traffic Signal System Optimization (TF350) CHV39 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000
I-805, SR54 and Otay Mesa Transportation System
Improvements (TF344, TF359, TF356)
CHV44
$80,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
New Sidewalks: Alpine Ave. CHV58 $300,000
Traffic Signal Upgrade: Third & Naples; Industrial & Anita,
Moss, Naples
CHV60
$250,000
$450,000
SUBTOTAL Congestion Relief $3,395,000 $3,500,000 $3,700,000 $3,900,000 $4,050,000
Congestion Relief (TF3S4) CHV43 $30,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000
Emergency Storm Drain Repair CHV50 $600,000
Neighborhood Traffic/Ped Safety Program (TF327) CHV34 $20,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000
School Zone Traffic Calming Program (TF345, TF-NEW) CHV33 $398,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000
Minor Pavement Rehabilitation Program (Including seals) CHV06 $150,000 $],007,000 $1,083,000 $1,153,000 $1,266,000
Advance Planning Studies (OP202) CHV22 $47,000 $49,000 $52,000 $55,000 $57,000
Traffic Monitoring Program (TF274, TF321 and TF325) CHV45 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000
Traffic Signing and Striping (TF332)(STM369), Studies and
SignaUStreetlight Upgrade (TF366) and Maintenance
CHV35
$140,000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
SUBTOTAL Maintenance $1,455,000 $1,451,000 $1,530,000 $1,603,000 $1,718,000
TOTAL $4,850,000 $4,951,000 $5,230,000 $5,503,000 $5,768,000
REMAINING FUNDS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
co
Prepared 3/20/12
1kTTAGHMENT `1
RESOLUTION 2012-~~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY"COUNCIL OF:THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL OF GRANT
.APPLICATIONS FOR` STATE-LEGISLATED. SAFE ROUTES
TO SCHOOL (SR2S) FUNDING CYCLE 10 TO IMPROVE
`PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES AT TWO
ELIGIBLE LOCATIONS .
WHEREAS, California legislated a Safe Routes to School (SR2S) program in 1999 with
the enactment of AB 1475; and
WHEREAS, the goals of the SR2S program are to reduce injuries and fatalities through
the construction of capital projects that improve safety for children in grades K-12 who walls or
bicycle to school and. to encourage increased walking and bicycling to school; and
WHEREAS, Section 2333.5 of the Streets and Highways Code calls for the Department
of Transportation, in consultation with the California Highway Patrol (CHP), to make grants
available to local governmental agencies under the program based upon the results of a statewide
competition; and
WHEREAS, a Call for Projects has been announced for Cycle 10 which would be funded
from the 2011/12 State Budget Act and the projected funding from the 2012113 State Budget;
and
WHEREAS, the deadline for submitting applications is Mazch 30, 2012; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends the submittal of the following two applications for SR2S
funding:
• Quintazd Street Corridor Pedestrian Safety Improvements from Third Avenue to
Hilltop Drive. (estimated cost up to $798,900)
• Hazel Goes Cook Elementary School Pedestrian Safety Improvements (estimated cost
up to $434,240)
WHEREAS, at the March 7, 2012 meeting of the Safety Commission, a motion was
made and approved to support the submittal of grant applications for State-Legislated Safe
Routes to School funding; and
WHEREAS, a ten percent minimum local funding match is required for the SR2S grant
program.
ATTACHMENT 5 CHV48 OVERLAY LIST
RoadName BegLocation EndLocation
7TH ST ~ MAIIJ ST - S END
ADA ST BAY BL . FRONTAGE RD W
ALPINE AV MOSS ST NAPLES ST
_.
ALVARADO ST ..___ .
.THIRD AVE SECOND AVE
... _
~
. _
AMENA CT 'SCDS TIERRA DEL RAY
ANITA JUNE CT W CDS FOURTH AV
AUSTIN CT REDLANDS PL SCDS
AZALEA ST OLEANDER AV
_ _ _ LAUREL AV
_
AZUSA CT REDLANDS PL ECDS
BANNER AV MONTGOMERY ST ZENITH ST
BAY BL _.
I-5 FREEWAY RAMP __.
PALOMAR ST
BEECH AV - 'JAMES ST ~ K ST '
BEECH AV MADRONA ST .END OF STREET
BEECH AV SIERRA WY L ST '
BONITA RD CITY LIMIT @ WILLOW ST ALLEN SCHOOL RD
BRANDYWINE AV MENDOCINO DR MAIN ST
BRANDYWINE AV POINT LA JOLLA MENDOCINO DR
BRIGHTWOOD AV - KEARNEY ST K ST
BRISBANE ST N FOURTH AVE TROUSDALE DR
BRITTON AV REED CT MACE ST
BUCKNELL ST -STANFORD AV LEHIGH AV
BUENA VISTA WY ~ CALIENTE LP -0ERRITOS CT
.CANYON DR ._ _..
CANYON CT
'VIA HACIENDA
CEDAR AV I ST
~ - '.CDS
'CEDAR AV - JAMES ST - ~KST
CENTER ST FIRST AVE ;ROSEVIEW PL
CHARDONNAY TE REISLING TE ECDS
CHURCH AV ~ CENTER ST
_ MADRONA ST
.
..
CHURCH AV _ .
_ EST _ F
ST
_
CHURCH AV _
J ST K ST
CITADEL CT W CDS RUTGERS AV
COE PL STANFORD AV E CDS '
COLORADO AV ~ _..
SIERRA WY
1ST
COLTRIDGE LN TRAILRIDGE DR CORRAL CANYON
~ CORDOVA DR E J ST DORADO WY
CORTE CERRADA _... ___
BUEN TIEMPO DR
ECDS
CORTE HELENA AV '.CDS
..
. EST
,.
.. _... _
CORTE MARIA AV .. .
_ ... CDS _... G ST
__
CORTE MARIA AV _ __ _
DST EST
.DST .THIRD AVE W MOUNTAIN VIEW DR
D ST ~ W MOUNTAIN VIEW DR SECOND AVE
DATE AV ._._ _
JAMES ST
K ST
DATE ST OTAY VALLEY RD
__ DATE CT
_ _.
DAVID DR ~ 180FT W/O LORI LN WILER DR
DAVIDSON ST ,FOURTH AVE
.....
.. DEL MAR AV
. _.
'
'.DEL MAR AV __.... .
_. .EST. .. ... ..
_._ G ST
_._ __
-0EL MAR AV_. _.. __.. IST.. _. _
__._. .
KST
__ _ _.._._ __,
.
DEL MAR AV_. _.... _.. .KEARNEY ST.__ .KST
DEL MAR AV SEA VALE ST
_ _ _ -CHULA VISTA ST
_
.
DEL MAR CT __
CDS ALVARADO ST
DEL MONTE AV 'MONTGOMERY ST
~ MAIN ST
~
DENNIS AV ~ ~ EJST E MILLAN ST
DESIGN CT W CDS MAXWELL RD '
'DOROTHY ST FRONTAGE RD .INDUSTRIAL BL
,_ _._
DOUGLAS ST CREST PASEO DEL REY
DRAKE CT REDLANDS PL .SCDS
6-~~ ~
RoadName Beg Location EndLocation
DUKE ST - - -_
STANFORD AV
tEHIGH AV
E J ST ~ MELROSE AVE FLOYD AVE
'.E LEANNA CT MYRA AV ECDS
E MILLAN ST W END E CDS
E MOSS ST __ _ _
MELROSE AV~
' NOLAN LN
E ONEIDA ST JUDSON WY NEPTUNE DR
E ORLANDO ST MONSERATE AV MELROSE AV
E OXFORD ST HILLTOP DR MELROSE AVE
E OXFORD ST OSAGE AV ~ OLEANDER AV
___
E PAISLEY ST _
HILLTOP DR
HELIX AV
..
E PALOMAR DR ...
HILLTOP DR
CUYAMACA AV
:
E PALOMAR ST _
E EDGE/O 1805 BRIDGE OLEANDER AV
E PARK LN EST F ST
E PROSPECT ST HILLTOP DR MONSERATE AVE
E QUEEN ANNE DR .THERESA WY MONSERATE AVE
~E QUEEN ANNE DR W CDS JUDSON WY ,
E RIENSTRA ST MELROSE AV NACION AV
~~
~~
E~SIERRA WY~ - ~ HILLTOP DR~~~ -~ ~ CUYAMACA AV
---- - -
EL CAPITAN DR
HILLTOP DR
E CDS
.
EL CAPITAN DR ... _ ... _ __... - .WCDS ..E END
ELDER AV N CDS ~- K ST
ELM AV -......... _. .IST _ 'CDS
ELM AV - PALOMAR ST PROSPECT ST
ELMHURST ST XAVIER AV ~ CORNELL AV
.EMERSON ST _... _
T~THIRD AV
FIRST AVE
F ST .FOURTH AV THIRD AVE
FAIVRE ST JACOUA ST ' 27TH ST
' FALLBROOK CT WCDS ACACIA AVE
FENTON ST EASTLAKE PW
. HALE PL
.
_.. _._._ .....
'
FIG AV .. _. __ ....
... .. .KEARNEY ST_.. _ .
.
SEND
.FIRST AV ~- IST -~- J ST
FIRST AV .PROSPECT ST N
FLOYD AV _ .
E J ST
HALE ST
G ST FOURTH AVE
. SECOND AVE
__
_~
GARRETT AV .
_ DST E ST
GARRETT AV J ST KEARNEY ST
__
GARRETT AV ___
PARK WAY
G ST
GENTRY LN ~ FIRST AV .FEND
GLOVER AV MANKATO ST SCDS
_....
..
GRANJAS RD N CDS .NAPLES ST
_.. _.
GRETCHEN RD _
EJST ~
EMILLAN ST
. .,_.
GUAVA AV ~ ~ KEARNEY ST S END '~
HST BROADWAY HILLTOP DR
HALE ST FLOYD AV HALECREST DR
HALECREST DR LORILN ,TELEGRAPH CANYON RD
HALSEY ST COLORADO AVE
~ WOODLAWN AVE
HALSEY ST .SECOND AVE MINOT AVE
HAMPTON CT WCDS BRISTOL CT
.HARTFORD ST HAMDEN DR ~ 'LAKESHORE DR -
'. HELIX AV ~ - E PALOMAR ST E PAISLEY ST
HELIX AV N CDS E PALOMAR ST
HELIX AV OXFORD ST SCDS
~HERITAGERD CITY LIMITS CITY LIMITS
HILLTOP DR ~ .CDS ~ D ST
HILLTOP DR ,NAPLES ST EAST PALOMAR ST EAST
IST BROADWAY FOURTH AVE
INKOPAH ST OSAGE AV
_ OSSA AV
_.
6-18 2
RoadName BegLocation EndLocation
'J ST ~ BROADWAY .FOURTH AVE -
J ST THIRD AVE .SECOND AVE
JADE AV ~ JASPER AV
__ TOURMALINE ST
JAMES ST _ _
ASH AV .FIFTH AV
JAMUL AV ~ E NAPLES ST SAN MARCOS PL
JAMUL AV MONSERATE AV MELROSE AV
__...
_ _.
JAMUL CT _..
OSAGE AV
OLEANDER AV
JASPER AV ,ORANGE AV JADE AV
'JEFFERSON AV __ __
9 ST
J ST
JEFFERSON AV MOSS ST NAPLES ST
JEFFERSON AV SIERRA WY L ST
_
~
JUDSON WY ~ - E PALOMARST E PAISLEY ST ~
----__.
JUDSON WY ~
_ -____
E QUEEN ANNE DR
E OUINTARD ST
JUNIPER ST LILAC AV LAUREL AV
KST ~ ,FOURTH AVE THIRD AVE
KEARNEY~ST FIFTH AV BRIGHTWOOD AV
~.
~KEARNEY ST - ~ ~ THIRD AVE ~ ~
_. SECOND AV
_
KENNEDY ST ___._
.THIRD AV (SECOND AV
KINGST ~ SECOND AVE FIRST AVE
~LAKESHORE DR ASHBROOK DR CREEKWOOD WY '
__
LANDIS AV _._ ...
D ST
EST
LAS FLORES DR LANSLEY WAY
r
. MONTEBELLO ST
..._._._ _
- _. .. _.. _...
LAS FLORES DR _...
_ ....,... _
. __
~ N CDS .
~ D ST
LAUREL AV .JUNIPER ST ~ LILAC AVE
' LEHIGH AV GOTHAM ST BUCKNELL ST
LILAC AV JUNIPER ST AZALEA ST
LILAC AV WISTERIA ST RIVERA ST
:LOYOLA CT 'NW CDS 1THACA ST
~,LYNNDALE PL ~ 'CITY LIMITS CITY LIMITS
LYNWOOD DR ~ BONITA RD 131 FT S/O BONITA RD
_ __
M AV
N CITY LIMIT
E 30TH ST
-MACE ST ..__
,MAIN ST
SEND
MADISON AV CRESTED BUTTE ST NAPLES ST
MADRONA ST DEL MAR AVE SECOND AVE
MANKATO ST MADISON AVE ECDS
MANZANITA ST ~ MARIPOSA ST OLEANDER AV
. _.___
'MARIA WY _. __... _..._. _..__.._ __.ELST _. .. _ _...._ IE MOSS ST__
__
MARIPOSA CI
bLEANDER AV
'
_
.MARIPOSA ST _.
_._.
MANZANITA ST OLEANDER AV
MAX AV E PROSPECT ST E RIENSTRA ST
.MAX AV E QUINTARD ST E RIENSTRA ST
MEDICAL CENTER CT - 660FT SW/O MEDICAL CENTER DR ISW END '
MELROSE AV 'CDS SHEFFIELD CT
MESA GRANDE PL ,. _. _.
N CDS
'.TIERRA BONITA PL
MITSCHER ST MINOT AVE
_ FIRST AVE
__. _ _ _.
MONTCALM ST NEPTUNE AV NACION AV
MONTCLAIR ST MELROSE AV ,MONTEREY AV
MONTCLAIR ST MONTEREY AVE NEPTUNE AV
MONTCLAIR ST NEPTUNE AV NACION AV
MONTEBELLO ST FIRST AVE
. ECDS
__
MONTERA CT TERRA NOVA DR ECDS
__
MONTGOMERY ST .FOURTH AV
~ FRESNO AV
MOSS ST- ~ ALPINE AVE `NAPLES ST
... _..
MOSS ST
THIRD AVE
FOURTH AVE
MURRAY ST SECOND AVE CDS
_..
!
.MYRA AV. .. .. _.. ELST. _. _. E MOSS ST
MYRA AV E NAPLES ST S CDS
6-19 3
RoadName BegLocation EndLocation
MYRA AV MELROSE AVE 90 DEGREE TURN
MYRA AV - - ~ ~ MYRA AVE 90 DEGREE TURN ' E J ST
MYRA AV N CDS E OXFORD ST
_. -... -_
'MYRA CT
.NCDS
MALTA AV
NACION AV 'J ST EAST TELEGRAPH CYN RD
NACION AV NAPLES ST EAST MELROSE AVE
NAPAAV NCDS EONEIDAST
..
.
NAPA CT .. _ _ ...N CDS - ,QUINCE PL
NAPLES ST THIRD AVE ALPINE AVE
-NEW HAVEN DR HARTFORD ST HAMDEN DR
_..-
~
..._
NILE CT E OXFORD SY - S CDS
__.
NIXON PL __
N DEL MAR AVE CDS
-.... -
NOCTURNE CT
NOLAN AV
SCDS
NOLAN AV E ONEIDA ST
.. _ E PALOMAR ST
__
_
NOLAN AV
.
_..
QUAIL PL
E RIENSTRA ST
NOLAN CT E RIENSTRA ST SCDS
-.......
NOLAN WY . .,. - - _ - ROMAN WY
. -
- E MOSS ST
.
~
OAKLAWN AV -. - -
-... I ST ST
J
OAKLAWN AV MOSS ST NAPLES ST
.OASIS AV E NAPLES ST E OXFORD ST
OCALA AV NCDS S CDS
- - -
OCELOT AV __.
NANETTE ST
'. E OXFORD ST
OLEANDER AV OLYMPIC PW ~
_.-__
_ SEQUOIA ST
..-
"--
.OLIVE AV .. ..... .._ .-
_ SEQUOIA ST -_ TALLOW CT
OLIVE CT 'NCDS SEQUOIA ST
ORIOLE PL E PALOMAR ST ,SCDS
__ __
_._
OSSA AV _. _ ._
NCDS
JAMUL CT
OTAY LAKES RD E H ST GOTHAM ST
OTAY LAKES RD GOTHAM ST
-~ - - MIRACOSTA CI
-
.- ~~
OTAY LAKES RD - - - ~ ~~ RIDGEBACK RD EHST
OXFORD ST ~ W CDS BROADWAY
.
PACIFIC AV - BAY BL- ~ ANITA ST
PALM AV ~ VALLEY AV SEND
PALOMAR DR FOURTH AV W CDS
PALOMAR ST BROADWAY ORANGE AVE
PALOMAR ST TOBIAS DR HILLTOP DR
PASEO DEL REY ___
BAJO DR
- -
~ -
DOUGLAS ST
PASEO DEL REY - -~ .
~~ ~ ~ EHST EJST
___
PASEO MAGDA
PASEO RANCHO
REGULO PL
_.
PEPPERWOOD CT ~ OAK VIEW TE SCDS
PLAZA CT MALL ENTRANCE PASEO DEL RAY
'POINSETTIA ST~ LANTANA AV CARISSA AV
POINT CAIMAN CT NW CDS MORRO POINT DR
.POINT CONCEPCION CT N CDS POINT ARGUELLO DR
POINT LOMA CT POINT ARGUELLO DR S CDS
POINT MUGU CT .SEQUOIA ST S CDS
POINT PACIFIC CT ~ NW CDS 'POINT LAJOLLA DR
POINT VICENTE GT CROWN POINT CT SE COS
PORT CARDIFF ~REISLING TE 'SCDS
_..
PORT CHELSEA PORT RENWICK .SCDS
__.. _-
' PRINCESS MANOR CT
E RIENSTRA ST
SCDS
PROSPECT ST ELM AV TOBIAS DR
.QUAIL CT W CDS
- OLEANDER AV
QUAIL PL -~- NOLAN AV- NACION AV
~
QUEEN ANNE DR FIFTH AV FOURTH AV
QUINTARD ST TOBIAS DR HILLTOPDR
-
RACE POINT CT
W CDS
TORTUGA POINT DR
6-20 4
RoadName BegLocation EndLocation
REGENCYCT REGENCY WY ECDS
, RIDGE CREEK DR ~~ ~ WCDS ~
_.. FORESTER LN
RIDGEBACK RD~ N RANCHO DEL REY PW OTAY LAKES RD
_
ROMAN WY _ _
NOLAN WV NACION AV
RUE AVALLON ~ .HILLSIDE DR S CDS
RUTGERS AV GOTHAM ST
-. _._ ... OTAY LAKES RD
_.. _.. __ _ -
SAN MIGUEL DR -- - .._~.. - -_._ FOURTH AV_._. 'ECDS
SANDSTONE CT MELROSE AV E CDS
SATINWOOD CT ~ N CDS
- -..
: .SATINWOOD WY
-... -..
.
SEA VALE CT - -, -_. .. .
CDS_ .DATE AVE
.__..
SEA VALE ST THIRD AVE DELMAR AVE
SECOND AV PALOMAR ST .ORANGE AVE.
SEQUOIA ST BRANDYWINE AV POINT CABRILLO CT
SEQUOIA ST OLIVE AV BRANDYWINE AV
SEOUOIA ST POINT CABRILLO CT POINT ARGUELLO DR
SHASTA ST FIRST AVE ECDS -
SHEFFIELD CT ~ END OF STREET
_, MELROSE AVE
__.
SHIRIEY ST _
N DEL MAR AVE N SECOND AVE ,
SIERRA WY BROADWAY FIFTH AV
SKYLARK WY. ~ _. .._ __.. N CDS._ TEAL ST
SMITH AV G ST .ROOSEVELT ST
STANFORD AV ~ N CDS GOTHAM ST I
,TALLOW CT OLIVE AV ECDS
TAMARACK CT OLIVE AV
. E CDS '
_.__.. -
.TAMPA CT REDLANDS PL SCDS
-
TANOAK CT ... _- -
OLEANDER AV
ECDS
'TEAK CT ~ ~ OLIVE AV ECDS
TELEGRAPH CANYONRD CAMINO ENTRADA MELROSE AVE
TERRA NOVA DR ~ BEACON PL PLAZA DEL CID
THERESA WY E PROSPECT ST E OUINTARD ST
THIRD AV N FOURTH AVE DST
THORNTON RD
._..__.
___ -
FORESTER LN
CORRAL CANY
THRUSH ST FINCH PL ROBIN PL ,
TIERRA BONITA PL BUENA VISTA WY
-
~ .MESA GRANDE PL
~-
TOBIAS DR ~ ~- -~~ ~~-~~
-- BISHOP ST ~
_.--.. 'SHERWOOD SY
.. _-...
..
.. .
''TOBIAS DR _-. ..... _.-._. __.OXFORD ST-._._ GENTRY WY
.
_.
TOBIAS DR QUINTARD ST .BISHOP ST
YOBIAS DR SHERWOOD ST KINGSWOOD ST ,
TRAILRIDGE DR WCDS ECDS
TURQUOISE CT ~ MELROSE AV NE CDS
TWIN OAKS AV ' DAVIDSON ST F ST
TWIN OAKS AV EST DAVIDSON ST
___
TWIN OAKS AV
F ST
CYPRESS ST
TWINOAKS AV _.
J ST
K ST
VANCE ST FOURTH AVE ,.
- ECDS
VANCE ST - - - ~ - WCDS .
~ MINOT AVE
VIA TRIESTE E NAPLES ST
~ W CDS
.WALNUT AV ~ NCDS- PALOMAR ST _..
WALNUT DR SPRUCE RD .MAX AV
_
_
WESTMONT CT WCDS CAMINO ELEVADO
WHITNEY ST ~ 'MADISON AVE ECDB
WINDSOR CI WINSOR COURT INLET
~ 'WINSOR CT OUTLET
WISTERIA ST OLEANDER AV
~ LANTANA AV
WOODLARK LN WOODLARK CT
__ LARKHAVEN DR
.____
WOODLAWN AV ~ ___
E ST
__.._. , _.-
FST
.. `
. .. _.
WOODLAWN AV. - - ._ KST
__ L ST
_-_
.ZENITH ST ~ _
~ THIRD AV ALBANY AV
_ __
6-21 5
RoadName BegLocation EndLocation
ZINFANDEL TE CABERNET DR '~ PORT CLARIDGE
285 SECTIONS
6-22 s
ATTACHMENT6
CMP Priority List
REF PIPE ID # Segment As Built Width LENGTH
FT EASEMENT
2 1738 Elsie Way & Penelope Dr 49-039-02 15" $0' 10' Sewer/Drainage Eas.
3 10737 Del Mar & Moss 77-356D 18" 383' 10' Drainage Eas.
4 10262 Maple Dr & Spruce Rd TM 3185-1 18" 41' Public street
5 13570 Orange & Third Ave 88-704 18" 49' Public street
6 1105 J Street & Garrett 71-13D 36" 308' Public street
7 1157 Inkopah St & Melrose Ave 59-139/140L 18"X 29" 122' No Records
8 4590 Mankato St & Fourth Ave 72-212D 30" 10' Public Alley
9 3719 Minot St & Las Floras Dr 79-127D 12" 209' 6' Drainage Eas.
10 10724 E St & Fourth Ave 75-79/80D 24"x 36" 47' Public street
11 10300 Fourth Ave & Moss St 92-485 30" 317' Public street
12 4113 Flower St & Woodlawn 77-266D 30" 388' 8' Drainage Easement
* 13 4140 Fourth Ave & Roosevelt 73-144 16" 6']' Public street
14 10037 Main St & Fresno Ave 01029-03 36" 520' Public street
IS 11380 Broadway No Records 48" 607' Public street
* 16 1 1201 Industrial Blvd & I-5 Freeway No Records 12" 27T I-5 Freeway R/W
17 10717 Press Lane & Trousdale Dr 60-74L 16" 75' Public street
M
N
I
cD
`Pipe is undersized
RESOLUTION NO. 2012
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE TRANSNET LOCAL
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FOR
FISCAL YEARS 2012/2013 THROUGH 2016/2017 FOR
INCLUSION IN THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, PROVIDING THE
CERTIFICATION AND INDEMNITY STATEMENTS
NECESSARY TO OBTAIN TRANSNET FUNDS AND
PROGRAMMING $535,873 IN FUNDS FROM COMPLETED
PROJECTS
WHEREAS, on November 4, 2004, the voters of San Diego County approved the San
Diego Transportation Improvement Program Ordinance and Expenditure Plan (TransNet
Extension Ordinance); and
WHEREAS, the TransNet Extension Ordinance provides that SANDAG, acting as the
Regional Transportation Commission, shall approve amulti-year program of projects submitted
by local jurisdictions identifying those transportation projects eligible to use transportation sales
tax (TransNet) funds; and
WHEREAS, in February 2012 the City Of Chula Vista was provided with an estimate of
annual TransNet local street improvement revenues for fiscal years 2013 through 2017; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends adopting the TransNet Local Street Improvement
Program of Projects for Fiscal Years 2012/2013 through 2016/2017 for inclusion in the Regional
Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) as shown on the attached table (Exhibit A); and
WHEREAS, there are $535,873 in prior year TransNet funds previously allocated to
projects that are now complete. These projects include: CHV19 -North Broadway
Reconstruction (STM354); CHV42 -Major Intersection Safety (TF353); and CHV55 -Castle
Park Improvements (STL342 only); and
WHEREAS, the TransNet Local Street Improvement Program of Projects for Fiscal
Years 2012/2013 through 2016/2017 reallocates the funds from completed projects to other
TransNet eligible projects; and
WHEREAS, the City Of Chula Vista has held a noticed public meeting on March 27,
2012, with an agenda item that clearly identified the proposed list of projects prior to approval of
the projects by its authorized legislative body in accordance with Section 5(A) of the TransNet
Extension Ordinance and Rule 7 of SANDAG Board Policy No. 31; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that pursuant to Section 2(C)(1) of the
TransNet Extension Ordinance, the City Of Chula Vista certifies that no more than 30 percent of
its annual revenues shall be spent on maintenance-related projects.
6-24
Resolution No.
Page 2
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that pursuant to Section 4(E)(3) of the TransNet
Extension Ordinance, the City of Chula Vista certifies that all new projects, or major
reconstruction projects, funded by TransNet revenues shall accommodate travel by pedestrians
and bicyclists, and that any exception to this requirement permitted under the Ordinance and
proposed shall be clearly noticed as part of the City of Chula Vista's public heazing process.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the pedestrian exclusion on the east side of Industrial
Blvd. north of Anita Street be approved because roadway construction will only be done along
the west side of Industrial Blvd. and addition of said sidewalk on the east side would not provide
continuous access. This exception has been noticed as part of the public hearing process.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that pursuant to Section 8 of the TransNet Extension
Ordinance, the City of Chula Vista certifies that the required minimum annual level of local
discretionary funds to be expended for street and road purposes will be met throughout the 5-
year period consistent with the most recent Maintenance of Effort Requirements adopted by
SANDAG.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that pursuant to Section 9A of the TransNet Extension
Ordinance, the City of Chula Vista certifies that it will collect $2,165, plus all applicable annual
increases, from the private sector for each newly constructed residential housing unit in that
jurisdiction to comply with the provisions of the Regional Transportation Congestion
Improvement Program (RTCIP).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that pursuant to Section 13 of the TransNet Extension
Ordinance, the City of Chula Vista certifies that it has established a separate Transportation
Improvement Account for TransNet revenues with interest earned expended only for those
purposes for which the funds were allocated.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that pursuant to Section 18 of the TransNet Extension
Ordinance, the City of Chula Vista certifies that each project of $250,000 or more will be clearly
designated during construction with TransNet project funding identification signs.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Chula Vista does hereby certify that all
other applicable provisions of the TransNet Extension Ordinance and SANDAG Board Policy
No. 31 have been met.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Chula Vista agrees to indemnify, hold
harmless, and defend SANDAG, the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission,
and all officers and employees thereof against all causes of action or claims related to City of
Chula Vista's TransNet funded projects.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista adopts
the TransNet Local Street Improvement Program of Projects for Fiscal Years 2012/2013 through
2016/2017 for inclusion in the RTIP.
6-25
Resolution No.
Page 3
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Chula Vista has added to the 2012 RTIP
the Heritage Road extension from Olympic Parkway to Main Street funded with local
development fees, because the need for the road will occur within the next the five fiscal years.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the prior year TransNet funds, previously allocated
to projects now complete, will be programmed as follows:
• CHV 18 -Fourth Avenue Sidewalk Improvements (STL291): $25,000
• CHV33 -Enhanced Traffic Calming Crosswalk Improvements at the vicinity of
Montgomery Elementary School (STL375): $80,000
• CHV08 -Willow Street Bridge (Traffic Signal Design): $75,000
• CHV59 -Sidewalk Installation along Naples Street (STL365): $90,000
• CHV50 -Emergency Storm Drain Repair: $250,000
• CHV22 - CIP Management (OP208): $15,8~~
Presented by
Richard A. Hopkins
Director of Public Works
Exhibit A
6-26