Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 2000-367 RESOLUTION NO. 2000-367 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROV1NG THE MULTIPLE SPECIES CONSERVATION PROGRAM (MSCP) SUBREGIONAL PLAN AS THE FRAMEWORK PLAN; ADOPTiNG THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA MSCP SUBAREA PLAN CONDITIONED ON THE FOLLOWING: 1) THE FUTURE EXECUTION BY ALL PARTIES OF AN IMPLEMENTING AGREEMENT SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM OF THE DRAFT IMPLEMENTING AGREEMENT, 2) THE ISSUANCE OF A BIOLOGICAL OPINION CONSISTENT WITH THE CHULA VISTA MSCP SUBAREA PLAN AND THE DRAFT IMPLEMENTING AGREEMENT, AND 3) THE ISSUANCE OF TAKE PERMITS WITH CONDITIONS THAT ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE CHULA VISTA MSCP SUBAREA PLAN AND THE DRAFT IMPLEMENTiNG AGREEMENT; AND FINDING THAT THE DRAFT IMPLEMENTING AGREEMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CHULA VISTA MSCP SUBAREA PLAN AND AFFIRMING ITS SUBMITTAL WHEREAS, as lead agencies for the Multiple Species Conservation Program CMSCP'') Subregional Plan, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the City of San Diego prepared and certified a Final Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement for the Issuance of Take Authorizations for Threatened and Endangered Species due to urban growth within the Multiple Species Conservation Program CMSCP'') planning area ("Final EIR/EIS") in January, 1997 and adopted the Final MSCP Subregional Plan in August, 1998; and WHEREAS, as a responsible agency, the City of Chula Vista ("City") participated in the preparation of the Final EIPJEIS through consultation and comment; and WHEREAS, the MSCP Subregional Plan contemplated that local jurisdictions including the City of Chula Vista would participate in the MSCP Subregional Plan and seek federal and state take authorization by adopting a subarea plan consistent with the conservation strategies contained in the MSCP Subregional Plan; and WHEREAS, the City prepared and submitted a Draft MSCP Subarea Plan to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the City of San Diego in August, 1996, for inclusion in the Draft MSCP Subregional Plan and for consideration by the lead agencies in their environmental review of the Draft MSCP Subregional Plan; and WHEREAS, since the adoption of the MSCP Subregional Plan, the City, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Califomia Department of Fish and Game (hereina~er referred to as the "Wildlife Agencies") have continued to negotiate a number of aspects of the Subarea Plan, including but not limited to, the refinement of the conditions of coverage for covered projects, the type and extent of protection for narrow endemic species, the amount and type of public facilities and infrastructure to be allowed in the Preserve (as defined in the Subarea Plan), and an acceptable configuration for the university site adjacent to the Preserve; and WHEREAS, the City issued a Draft MSCP Subarea Plan dated February 16, 2000, to the Wildlife Agencies and the general public and received 17 public comment letters from various environmental groups, landowners, developers and the Wildlife Agencies; and Resolution 2000-367 Page 2 WHEREAS, the City continued to worked with the Wildlife Agencies and various landowners, developers and environmental groups to respond to comments and resolve issues during the Spring and Summer of 2000; and WHEREAS, on September 21, 2000, the City issued a draft MSCP Subarea Plan dated September 11, 2000, and a Draft Implementing Agreement dated September 20, 2000, to the Wildlife Agencies and the general public; and WHEREAS, the Draft Implementing Agreement dated September 20, 2000, follows the Model Implementing Agreement prepared as part of the adoption of the MSCP Subregional Plan; and WHEREAS, on September 22, 2000, the City submitted to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service a complete application for a Section 10(a)(1)(B) permit for incidental take pursuant to the U.S. Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, and submitted to the Califomia Department of Fish and Game a complete application for a take authorization permit pursuant to Section 2835 of the California Endangered Species Act, with both applications including the Draft MSCP Subarea Plan dated September 11, 2000, and a Draft Implementing Agreement dated September 20, 2000; and WHEREAS, the City desires to approve the MSCP Subregional Plan and adopt the Draft Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan dated September 11, 2000, including revisions attached hereto CChula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan"), but that the adoption shall be conditioned upon 1) the City's future approval and execution of an Implementing Agreement substantially in the form of the Implementing Agreement dated September 20, 2000, 2) the issuance by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service of a biological opinion that is consistent with the Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan and the Draft Implementing Agreement dated September 20, 2000, and 3) the issuance of a Section 10(a)(1)(B) permit pursuant to the U.S. Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended and a take authorization permit pursuant to Section 2835 of the State of California Endangered Species Act with conditions that are consistent with the Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan and the Draft Implementing Agreement dated September 20, 2000; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and the City Cotmoil set the time and place for a joint hearing on said project and notice of said heating, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City at least 10 days prior to the heating; and WHEREAS, the heating was held at the time and place as advertised on October 17, 2000, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission and City Council; and WHEREAS, the City's approval of the MSCP Subregional Plan and adoption of the Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan are discretionary actions covered by the Final EIR/EIS, and therefore, as a responsible agency, the City has a more limited role than does a lead agency under the Califomia Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"); and WHEREAS, the City has considered the Final EIR/EIS prepared by the lead agency together with the Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan and the Draft Implementing Agreement dated Resolution 2000-367 Page 3 September 20, 2000, and has reached its own conclusion about whether and how to approve the MSCP Subregional Plan and the Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan; and WHEREAS, the City has prepared an Addendum dated September 11, 2000, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15164 to fulfill the City's obligations as a responsible agency; and WHEREAS, the City has issued Findings of Fact for each of the significant environmental effects of implementing the Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan, in conformance with the CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, which enable the City to make full use of the Final EIRJEIS and the Addendum (CEQA Guidelines, sections 15101, 15093 and 15096, subd. (h)); and WHEREAS, the City has prepared an MSCP Mitigation And Implementing Agreement Monitoring Program For Biological Resources dated October 12, 2000, in compliance with Public Resources Code section 21081.6, subd. (a)( 1 ); and WHEREAS, the approval of the MSCP Subregional Plan and the conditional adoption of the Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan will not constitute a binding set of obligations on any public or private entity within the City of Chula Vista unless and until 1) the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service issues a biological opinion which affirms the conservation strategies in the Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan and the Implementing Agreement dated September 20, 2000, 2) take permits are issued by both Wildlife Agencies that are consistent with the Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan and Draft Implementing Agreement dated September 20, 2000, and 3) the City approves and executes an Implementing Agreement substantially in the form of the Implementing Agreement dated September 20, 2000~ and WHEREAS, full implementation of the Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan will also be subject to the City's future adoption of a Habitat Loss and Incidental Take CHLIT'') ordinance and amendments to the grading ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find, recommend, determine, resolve and order as follows: A. The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission and City Council at the joint public hearing on this project held on October 17, 2000, are hereby incorporated into the record of proceedings. These proceedings, evidence and documents, along with any documents submitted to the decision makers, together with all documents identified in the CEQA Findings of Fact, shall comprise the entire record of the proceedings for any California Environmental Quality Act claims; and B. The City Council does hereby consider that the Final Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement for the Issuance of Take Authorizations for Threatened and Endangered Species Due to Urban Growth Within the Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) Planning Area ("Final EIRJEIS") prepared and certified by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the City of San Diego in January, 1997, adequately addressed the environmental impacts of the MSCP Subregional Plan and the Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan~ and Resolution 2000-367 Page 4 ', C. The City Cotmcil does hereby determine that no subsequent or supplement environmental impact report is necessary for the City to conditionally approve and adopt the MSCP Subregional Plan and the Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan; and D. The City Council does hereby find that the Addendnm, the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the MSCP Mitigation and Implementing Agreement Monitoring Program for Biological Resoumes are prepared in accordance with the requirements of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista; and E. The City Council does hereby approve the MSCP Mitigation and Implementing Agreement Monitoring Program for Biological Resources dated October, 2000; and F. The City Council does hereby approve the MSCP Subregional Plan dated August, 1998, as the framework plan for the Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan; and G. The City Council does hereby adopt the Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan and does hereby find that the Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan is consistent with the MSCP Subregional Plan and will provide for the conservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of biological resources for protected species while at -- the same time allowing the City to carry out its development plans, and conditions the adoption on all of the following: 1. The future approval and execution of an Implementing Agreement substantially in the form of the Draft Implementing Agreement dated September 21, 2000; and 2. The issuance of a biological opinion that is consistent with the City of Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan and the Draft Implementing Agreement dated September 20, 2000; and 3. The issuance of a Section 10(a)(1)(B) permit pursuant to the U.S. Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended and a take authorization permit pursuant to Section 2835 of the State of California Endangered Species Act with conditions that are consistent with the Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan and the Draft Implementing Agreement dated September 20, 2000; and 4. City Council review and approval of a final fiscal impact analysis of the proposed Subarea plan, which addresses the economic feasibility of preserve assembly for the proposed plan in light of current and forecasted economic and fiscal factors. Issues to be considered in this analysis include but are not limited to the estimated completion schedules for key Resolution 2000-367 Page 5 infrastructure projects that are planned for the study area, such as State Route 125 and Salt Creek Sewer interceptor project. H. The City Council does hereby find that the Draft Implementing Agreement dated September 20, 2000, is consistent with the Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan and does hereby affirm the submittal of the Draft Implementing Agreement dated September 20, 2000, to the Wildlife Agencies. Presented by Approved as to form by Robert Leiter John M. Kaheny Planning and Building Director City Attorney PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, Califomia, this 17m day of October, 2000, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: Davis, Moot, Padilla, Salas, and Horton NAYS: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: None Shirley Hort~, Mayor ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, Susan Bigelow, City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2000-367 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 17th day of October, 2000. Executed this 17th day of October, 2000. Susan Bigelow, City Clerk