The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2012/03/13 Additional InformationMajor Donor & Independent Expenditure Reports Earl and Karen Jentz 2010 Earl Jentz $ 67,320.69 Karen Jentz $ 47,788.00 Total: $115,108.69 To: Councilman Casteneda $ 2,966.00 Council member Aguilar $ 19,801.00 2009 Earl Jentz $ 31,383.75 Karen Jentz $ 0.00 Total: $31,383.75 2008 Earl Jentz $515,313.25 Karen Jentz $ 17,287.11 Total: $532,600.36 To: Councilman Casteneda $ 18,781.00 2007 Earl Jentz $129,353.07 Karen Jentz $ 54,874.76 Total: $184,227.83 2006 Earl Jentz $134,962.70 Karen Jentz $ 51,585.30 Total: $186,548.00 To: Councilman Ramirez $ 5,100.00 Councilman Casteneda $ 4,100.00 Total Earl and Karen Jentz 2006 -2010 $1,049,868.62 Council member Aguilar $ 19,801.00 Councilman Casteneda $ 25,847.00 Councilman Ramirez $ 5,100.00 EARL JENTZ'S ACTIONS AGAINST CITY Case Title/Number Descr!Rtlon Earl Jentz v. UCSP City of Chula Vista & David Garcia 37-2007-00003502-CU-WM-SC Earl Jentz v. Appeal of above matter City of Chula Vista & David Garcia D055401 Earl Tentz/Jackic Lancaster v. Writ for Review of Public Records City of Chula Vista 37-2007-00076370-CU-WM-SC Earl JenWJackie Lancaster v. Appeal of Ruling in above i:ase City of Chula Vista D053525 Earl Jent7 v,. Deborah Seiler Writ re: Prop E Cox & Rindone Real Parties in Thtc-rest 37-2009-00080752-CU-MC-CTL Date Filed 06/14/2007 06/25f2OO9 09/2112007 07/1912008 03/27/2008 Major Donor and Independent Expenditure Comm Campaign Statement SEE ON REVERSE -09 FEB -2 P 3 :4 6 NAME OF FII-ER my OF CHULA VI"'Ir Earl Jentz CITY CLERK'S 0'7 P INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURE COMMITTEE AND MAJOR DONOR COMMITTEE STATEMENT Type or print In Ink StahmienIt comrs period Amounts may be rounded to whok) dollars. from 10/19/2008 through 12131 /2008 1 3/5 6. Contributions (Including Loans, Forgiveness of Loans, and Loan Guarantees) and Expenditures Made (If more space is needed, use additional copies of this page for continuation Sheets.) DATE NAME AND ADDRESS OF PAYEE TYPE OF PAYMENT DESCRIPTION OF PA'Y'MENT CANDIDATE AND OFFICE, MEASURE AND JURISDICTION. AMOUNT THIS CUMULATIVE AMOUNT RELATIVE TO THIS (W- COWITTFE. ALSO ENTER J.D. KOSER) (IF OTHER MAN WRAETARY OR COMMITTEE PERIOD CANDIDATE, MEASURE, COHiFiRM ION OR LOAK) OR COMMITTEE I013012008 Chula Vistans for Elected City Attorney, [] mm-wy sign vArers 508.10 Calendar YW Yes on 0, supported by Earl Jentz a Corktrir Chula Vista concerned Chula Vista property owner r-1 Lom Prop Q 1400.85 and other concerned residents (#1299131) L-J Noft-Monotuy November 08 Election Other 261 Garrett Ave. Chula ViSta, CA 91910 0 Contftstion ❑ Wepenciam $ support ❑ oppose 10131/208 Chula Vistaos for Elected City Attorney, M"tary Contri1xition mailer Chula Vista 6987-00 CalarKlaryear Yes on Q, supported by Earl Jentz a Prop Q 147210.85 concerned Chula vista property owner 0 Loan g and other concerned residents (01299131) tit W November 08 Election 261 Garrett Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Corn4"awy � 0 Support ❑ oppm 11/06/2008 Chula Vistans for Elected City Attorney, Monelary ConvibLwm Chula Vista 20000.00 CaisndarYw Yes on 0, supported by Earl Jentz a Prop Q 147210.85 concerned Chula Vista property owner ❑ Lown $ and other concerned residents (#1299131) mn-monstaq November 08 Election Qttiar 261 Garrett Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91910 ❑ Contribution El kxlepenftnt E)wendftuce Support ❑oppose 11/1312008 Chula vistans for Elected City Attorney, ❑ Moroewy Cont0bution office Chula Vista 425.00 Calendar Ymr Yes on 0, supported by Earl Jentz a concerned Chula vista property owner Loan Prop Q 3 147210.85 and other concerned residents (#1299131) Non-monelary November 08 Election O1I`W 261 Garrett Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Contribution ❑ Independent $ 8 0'"', ❑ Oppose EVenditure SUBTOULS FPIPC From 461 (8189) For Technical Assistance: 9I6f322-SM [Jajor Donor and Independent Expenditure Committee Campaign Statement SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE NAME OF FILER Earl Jentz INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURE COMMITTEE AND MAJOR DONOR COMMITTEE STATEMENT Type or print in ink. Statement covers period Amounts may be rounded to whole dollars. from 011011 01D through 05129,12010 I 5/6 5. Contributions (Including Loans, Forgiveness of Loans, and Loan Guarantees) and Expenditures Made (If more space is needed, use additional copies of this page for continuation sheets.) DATE NAME AND ADDRESS OF PAYEE TYPE OF PAYMENT DESCRIPTION OF PAYMENT CANDIDATE AND OFFICE, MEASURE AND JURISDICTION, AMOUNT THIS CUMULATIVE AMOUNT RELATIVE TO THIS (IF COMMITTEE, ALSO ENTER I.D. NUMBER) (IF OTHER THAN MONETARY OR COMMITTEE PERIOD CANDIDATE. MEASURE, CONTRIBUTION OR LOAN) OR COMMITTEE 05/10/2010 San Diego Co Citizens for Representative Govt ® Monetary SD Co Citizens for Representative. Govt 6000.00 Calendar Year 339 East J Street Contribution ❑ Loan $ 33400.00 Chula Vista CA 91910 ❑ Non - Monetary Other ID' 1326881 Reference No: Contribution NO- ❑ Support E] Oppose E] Independent $ Expenditure 05/16/2010 San Diego Co Citizens for Representative Govt ® Monetary SD Co Citizens for Representative Govt 4500.00 Calendar Year 339 East J Street Contribution ❑ Loan $ 33400.00 Chula Vista CA 91910 ❑ Non - Monetary Other ID: 1326881 Reference No: Contribution ❑X Support ❑ Oppose ❑ independent $ Expenditure 05/21/2010 San Diego Co Citizens for Representative Govt ® Monetary SD Co Citizens for Representative Govt 5000.00 Calendar Year 339 East J'Street Contribution ❑ Loan $ 33400.00 Chula Vista CA 91910 ❑ Non- Monetary Other ID: 1326681 Reference No. Contribution Q Support ❑Oppose ❑ Independent $ Expenditure 05/22/2010 San Diego Co Citizens for Representative Govt ® Monetary SD to Citizens for Representative Govt 2000,00 Calendar Year 339 East J Street Contribution ❑ Loan $ 33400.00 Chula Vista CA 91910 C] Non - Monetary Other ID: 1326881 Reference No: Contribution NQ- ❑X Support ❑ Oppose Independent ❑ $ Expenditure SUBTOTALS FPPC From 461 (8/99) For Technical Assistance: 9161322 -5660 Page 1 of 3 John S. Moot From: Georgene Pharis (gpharis @ci.chula- vista.ca.usj Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 9:48 AM To: John S. Moot Cc: Bart Miesfeld Subject: RE: Open Act records request/John Moot Hello Mr. Moot, Responding to your below email, the costs incurred by the city are: Catzke Dillon & Balance S 438,705.54 McDougal Love S 31,544.32 Charles Bird (Luce Forward) S 11.725.9 TOT_4L COSTS: S 481,975.80 CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE ALSO ESTIMATES kN1 ADDITIONAL 5300,000.00 oI CITY STAFF TIME. Please let me know if f may be of further assistance. Regards, Georgene Pharis Records Manager Ofi-iae of the City Clerk 619,691 -6041 ex 3149 - - - -= Original Message - -- From: John S. Moot [mailto , Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 9:40 AM To: Georgene Pharis Cc: Bart Miesfeld Subject: RE: Open Pict records request /John Moot Ms. Pharis, Mr Meisfield advise he has the summary of legal costs incurred by the city as well as an estimate of the internal costs. Could you confirm those dollars to me. John S. Moot 1 Lawyer San Diego County Citizens for Representative Government. Notauthorized by a candidate or committee controlled by a candidate. 339.. E��.� J Street, Chula Vista, CA 91914 n -0911-01115. R PRST STD US Postage PAID PDI As Chula Vista City Attorney 1 would emphasize three core values: The first is Honesty: Fm I believe thatcltizens are entitled to honesty from their elected officials and the public servants whom they employ, Honesty should be at the core of what we do as attorneys and as public servants, All too, often it is not 'As your City Attorney I will bring with me the same values of honesty and integrity that I practice everyday at the Sheriff's Department and as I did as a prosecutor., l Vitt work tirelessly to restore the trust and confidence that you should have in your elected officials. The second value that I will work to promote is Independence. You have asked for a City Attorney who is independent from the Council and City officials. I come to this election as the only candidate qualffiedto be that independent City Attorney, Unlike my opponent, I have no ties to the City of Chula Vista that would cause someone to worry abaut the appearance of impropriety or bias, Myonly desire is to provide good, solid and unbiased legal advice that yourelected officials can count on and that you as citizens deserve. The final value that I will emphasize as City Attorney is Open Government. As your independently elected city attorney I promise to broadly interpret any statute, court rule of other authority that furthers your right of access to information concemi ng the conduct of the people's business. If you are looking for a City Attorney who recognizes that you are my most important client, then I would ask for yoursupportnow and your vote on June 8th. e Sbr Netws- April a, 2010 .. O, Vote for itisan Watry, Chula Vista 'i"L•RS FROM READERS what have we done? Vgien citizens 'oticing so hard to gee Proposition ctcd City Attorney) on the ballot m to pass it we never dreantecl of d of candidates would be pared :o only two candidates. Where are ;c slick lawyers from Los Angeles ayor Cheryl Cox warned us about Aorts to defeat it? ;tr:: in grave danger of electing Ise who will ensure "business as dy at City Hall and than is exaf- rc wanted to stop. it seems Glen its was a city ?ttorneywheia those c. nce packages were being paid Dave Rowlands, Laurie Madigan io knows who else. Mare trouble Googins was a recipient of one of it packages in at least the amount 5:921. lei". he disappeated from city staff IGer asking where lie had gone but seemed to know. Now it seems .signed from the city Attorney's in 2004 because of an inability ... k together as a team" and very I took his pot of our money and tvray. .v he's back wanting to be our City Iey ... the independent one who for when we passed Proposition what have we done! San Diego County Citizens for Representative Government. Not authorized by a candidate or committee controlled by a candidate. 339 E. J Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 Y-*ECRLOT"'C-050 Humberto & Lisa Peraza 957 Camino Del Sol Chug V sta, CA 91910 -6791 IIAI11 III IIII III I III IIIIIIIIIIiIII114 "FI +l[,IIIrIit -AIl I It PRST STD US Postage PAID PDI (Googins) resigned from the City Attorney's office in 2004 because of "an inability... to work together as a team" and very quietly took his pot of our money. Now he's back.. . SOME OF YOU KNOW ME, BUT FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO DON-9T; MYNAME IS MARK CROSHIER, I RESIDE IN BONITAICHULA VISTA AND RETIRED CHULA VISTA POLICE OFFICER. WHAT BRINGS- ME HERE TODAY IS THAT I READ ANARTICLE IN THE SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE DATED THURSDAYMARCH 8TH 2012. THE HEADING IS; CITYATTORNEYSQUABBLE SURFACES IN CHULA VISTA. I WILL LEAVE WITH YOU COPIES OF THAT ARTICLE. ALONG WITH MYSTATEMENT IN FEW DAYS I WILL BE EIGHTY YEARS OLD, AND I BELIEVE THAT I AM STILL WITH MY COMMON SENSE AND CONCERN FOR OTHERS TO SOME I AM COMPARED TO PETER FALK, BEST KNOWNAS COL UMBO. YES AND LIKE HIM - AM VERYPERSISTENT IN MYSEARCH OF THE TRUTH IN READING THAT ARTICLE, AN OLD ADAGE CAME TO MIND - ONE SHOULD BE CAREFUL OF WHAT ONE WISHES FOR - WHICH I BELIEVE CAN BE APPLIED TO THE CITYATTORNEY ISSUE. THE PEOPLE OF CHULA VISTA DECIDED THEY WANTED AN ELECTED PERSON IN THAT POSITION. THE ISSUE WAS WELL THOUGHT OUT, THEN REVIEWED AND PUT TO THE VOTERS. OUR FIRST ELECTED CITYATTORNEYNOW ASSUMES HIS POST THERE ON THE DIAS, AND I MIGHT ADD, THAT I HAVE NEVER MET HIM. B UT IT SEEMS HE MUST BE DOING A GOOD JOB, AS I HAVE YET TO READ OTHER WISE . THAT ARTICLE CAUSED ME TO FLASH BACK IN TIME TO SOME CHULA VISTA HISTORY ONCE THERE WAS WEAL THYMAN WHO WAS NOT HAPPY WITH THE WAY THINGS WERE BEING DONE BY OUR THEN CITYADMINIS TRA TION. HE HAD JUST SOLD A BANK AS I RECALL FOR SOMETHING LIKE TEN MILLION DOLLARS HE RAN IN OPPOSITION TO A WOMAN WITH ROOTS INKENTUCKYBUT WHOSE HEART WAS IN CHULA VISTA AND BUSINESS WOMAN TOO. SHE RAISED A FEW B UCKS, WALKED NEIGHBOR HOODS, POSTED SIGNS AND WAVED AT PASSING CARS. SHE WON, AND NOW TO A POINT; - THE PEOPLE OF CHULA VISTA ARE NOT FOR SALE. NOT THEN AND HOPEFULLYNOT NOW. BACK TO THE PRESENT; IT NOW SEEMS THAT TWO POLISHED POLITICIAN ARE AGAIN WITH MAN WITH DEEP POCKETS. WHOSE A GENDA I AND OTHERS ARE YET TO UNDERSTAND. IT SEEMS NOW, THAT THE CITYATTORNEY WASN'T THERE CHOICE IN THE ELECTION. SO THEYNOW WANT US TO CHANGE THE EXISTINGAGREEMENT . BECAUSE THE CITYATTORNEYHAS FOUND FLAWS IN SOME OF THERE DEALINGS, AS MENTIONED IN THAT ARTICLE AT FIRST REFUSE TO FESS TO WHAT THEY WERE ABOUT. THEN TRY TO EXPLAIN IT AWAY. NOT THE IMAGE I WANT THE WORLD TO SEE. ONE OF THE TWO SETTING POLITICIANS WANTS TO SPEAK FOR US. SAYING WE DIDN'T UNDERSTAND THE NITTY - GRITTY OF WHAT WE HAVE GOTTEN OUR SELVES INTO WITH OUR ELECTED CITYATTORNEY NOT SO: THE PEOPLE OF CHULA VISTA DO, AND HAVE SPOKEN - OUR CITYA TTORNE Y IS DOING WHAT WE EXPECT OF HIM. HE'S NOT ONE OF YOU YOUR RIGHT - -BUT IS TO BE INDEPENDENT OF YOU AS HE HAS DONE ON THIS ISSUE AS FOR HIS SALARY- I EXPECT HIM TO BE PAID EQUAL TO HIS PEERS - AS IS DONE WITH MOST ADMINISTRATIVE POSITIONS. IF HE CAN PREVAIL IN JUST ONE CASE AGAINST THIS CITY AND GIVE YOU THE GUIDANCE THAT IS NEEDED, THEN THE MATH WORKS OUT IN OUR FAVOR. THESE SAME FOLKS SEEM TO BE WORRIED ABOUT OVER PAYING OUR CITYATTORNEY THEN ON THE OTHER HAND ARE WILLING TO SPEND BIG MONEY ON SPECIAL ELECTIONS. NOT A MATH MAJOR BUT AGAIN, THAT JUST DOESN'T MAKE SENSE TO ME. AGAIN ON THE SUBJECT OF MONEYAND HOW IT CAN INFL UENCE ONES ACTIONS. AGAIN GOING BACK IN TIME I CAN RECALL WHEN ONE OF OUR COUNCIL WAS CAMPAIGNING FOR HIS NOW SEAT. HE WAS A REPUBLICANAND WHEN THEY REFUSED TO FUND HIM, HE BECAME AN INSTANT DEMOCRAT AND WAS GIVEN BIG B UCKS BYAN OUT OF STATE UNION, AND AS YOU CAN SEE HE WON. I STILL HAVING TROUBLE WITH THAT ONE. FOLKS TRULYI DON'T TAKE PLEASURE IN COMING BEFORE YO U WITH THIS - B UT I REFUSE TO SIT BACK AND LET BAD THINGS HAPPEN TO THE CITY FOR WHICH I DEDICATED MUCH OF MYLIFE TOO LIKE I HAVE SAID ON PRIOR OCCASIONS BEFORE YOU, I WILL PRAISE YOU FOR YOUR GOOD DEEDS, B UT IF I SEE CONFLICT, I SHALL RETURN. YES, MUCH LIKE MY MENTOR - COL UMBO 'CITY ATTORNEY SQUABBLE SURFACES IN CHULA VISTA Voters to decide on E limiting authority WENDY FRY • U -T d CHULA VISTA Voters will decide in June whether to place linikson the F authority and salary of the _ elected city attorney. o The City Council decided w 3 -2 early Wednesday, min- A utes past midnight after a z marathon eight -hour coun- cil meeting, to put forward a F ballot measure in the June 5 general election. The propo- sition is a result of a lengthy Z power struggle between the =) council majority and City v Attorney Glen Googins, who x was elected in 2010. 5 The measure will ask vot- N ers if they want to limit the authority and compensation of the city attorney, establish term limits for the office, and establish an independent le- gal office. The issue stems partly from a meeting in August, when Googins told the coun- cil that removing his author- ity to advise a committee that evaluates misconduct complaints' against top city officials would require a spe- cial vote of the people and a charter amendment. "There is no more conflict in your duty to make the pol- icy than there is in my char- ter- directed duty to actually advise on those policies to the various boards and com- missions that take up these issues," he said then. The June ballot measure would give the City Council the authority to establish an outside Office of Legislative Counsel to advise the city should concerns about con- flicts of interest arise. "It would essentially re- align some of the duties of the city attorney," said Dep- uty Mayor Steve Castaneda, who brought forward the proposal. "As we all know, voters approved an elected city attorney. I did not sup- port that measure. I think there were a number of flaws in it, and unfortunately a lot of voters don't get down into the nitty- gAtty." "There are some inherent conflicts with respect to the fact that we now have a pub- licly- elected city attorney, and in essence, one more poli- tician up here on the dais," he added. . A June ballot measure could cost taxpayers between $80,000 and $100,000, ac- cording to City Clerk Donna Norris. The manner in which the proposition was originally brought forward caused a stir. The draft document first appeared around 11 p.m. at a `Feb. 14 meeting when coun- cilmen Steve Castaneda and Rudy Ramirez began discuss- ing it. No other council members or city staff appeared to have a copy. Googins advised the two council members that the document could not be dis- tributed and discussed on the spot in accordance with the Brown Act, a state law that mandates thepublic be given prior notice of issues slated to be discussed. AEeb.16 public records re- quest by U T $an Diego pro- duced no correspondence to describe how the resolution came to be drafted or who paid for any" legal research involved. "Who paid for this docu- ment that was produced on the dais at the last council meeting and then emailed to us the next day?" Bensoussan asked Tuesday night. Ramirez said he was un- willing to answer. "You know, I'm here, and I serve the people of Chula Vista. I'm not here to answer other questions from other council members," Ramirez said. "So, you won't tell us who paid for it ?" Mayor Cheryl Cox chimed in. "I have no comment," Ramirez answered. The response did not sat- isfy Bensoussan, who was mentioned in a U T San Di- ego story last year concern- ing her use of private email to conduct negotiations about the South Bay Power Plant. "We all have, at one time or another, taken individual pledges to conduct govern- ment in an open or trans- parent manner, and this mysterious document just materialized," said Bensous- san, who joined Cox in opposi- tion. "I believe the public has the right to know who. paid for it and who prepared it:' The council members declined to answer Tues- day night, but on Wednes- day, Castaneda said he met months ago with landowner Earl Jentz and Ramirez to draft objectives of the pro- posed ballot measure. Jentz declined to state who wrote the legislation or how much he paid for a legal analysis of it. "The focus was to put the issues before the voters so the public could decide," said Jentz, who provided most of the campaign funding for the 2008 proposition creat- ing an elected city attorney position. Jentz, 69, and his wife, Kar- en, each spent about $50,000 on Googins' opponent in the 2010 city attorney's race, through independent ex- penditures. That money also supported two other council members who were funded to a lesser degree. Googins currently has a base salary of about $208,000 annually and there are no term limits on his office. The proposed measure would align his salary with those of Superior Court judges, who are now paid $178,789 a year, instead of basing it on comparable city attorney positions across the state. wendy.fry @utsandiega.com 619- 293 -1743 Twitter: @utsdFry Contact South County staff Wendy Fry, (619) 293 - 1743, wendy.fry @utsandiego.com Tawny Maya McCray (619)2934859, tawny.mccray -@ utsandiego.com John Cannon, editor, (619) 293 -1374, john.cannon@ utsandiego.com ark Croshiez a r c ~ a '~ A .-• v J~ : ' '_' ~~ ~~ ~ ~' , ~• ~a 'r' ~ ' < M : ~ ~. , . . .. ~a e ~ ~: ~ ~ re O ~ L: ^*+ ~, rr . ~ ,~ n ~. ~ _ ro rt ~t co rp ~ °-' ~ ry ~ O ~ ~ ~ ^ f 9 . r a ~_. ~ G ".S ~ qa ~ ~ ~ ~ R C C ~ ~ ~ ' __ d ~ d ~ ~' ~ `~' ~, b ~ ~ C ® ® ~ ~ '~ ~ U ~ ~ ~~ ,.~ ~ d a ~ ~~ w ~~,,, ° ~ tnrl ^ U ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c- c~ a j `~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~' m O r cfl o CZ. ~ ~ ~ o ~' '~' ,~ ~, y H ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ` ~ ~' t~J o y ~ x~ ~ ~, ~ o y ~~~ ~ o ~ ~ '~ n o~ o ~~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~~~ ~~ r ~~ ~~ ~ r ,,~ ~ VV - ) i c ~ A G ~~' ff ~ ~~ o ~ ~' ~ ~-~ ~~ ~ ~ V' J _ - ~ ; to .."~ i ~ ~ .~ ~ ~i~I ~~ Mark Croshiez 3~73/2oi2 U~~~ t~Y? CO lY` M~~1~ i GG~~i d ~j BRIEFLY ONANOTHER ISSUE - IF I MAY? THIRD AVE IMPROVEMENT OR A PARK???? AGAIN NOT HAVING THE FIGURES :BUT WOULD LIKE TO OFFER MY CONSER VATI VE SUGGESTION ON THE WEST SIDE WE HAVE SOME FOLK WHO ARE ENTITLED TO THERE FAIR SHARE =PARKS AND ALL ELSE THAT THE CITYHAS TO OFFER. AT ONE TIME CHULA VISTA HAD MORE PARK THAN MOST CITIES PER CAPITA I SEE B USINESS ON THIRD AVENUE IN DIRE NEED OF HELP TO SURVIVE. IMPROVE IT, MAKE ITANATTRACTIONAND THEY WILL COME. IF DONE WELL WILL HELP TO PROVIDE THE FUNDS FOR THAT PARKAND OTHER NEEDS. I THANK YOUALL FOR YOUR TIME FOR MY PRESENTATION 2 ~~Z Theresa Acerra x ~o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ „~• v ~ o rr- "t UQ ~ b ~, ...~ ~ ~' ~ ~' ~~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~s o b ~ ;. i 0 0 '~ A: ''~+ O ~ ~r rt to ~• ~" ~ ~ ~o cfl ~ ~ ... ~ C ~ ~ o ~ re ~ ~. G. ~' '-y o o ,~ ~s a~ b A~ /~ v 4 Q( ~ ~/ ~~ ~' , ~ r---~ ~~ ~ ~ z ~ H y ~ ~; '~ ~ O ~: O x ~ ~;~, z o v ,_ ~ z -~ ~ ~~, ~ o ~ ~~ n ,-. ~. ~ Z ~ F~. ~ ~ ^ ^ A ~s h o y ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~. v~ c ~ o `~ ~ ~ O ~ C ~~ ~ ~ 't C m_ ~ '..~ C ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ +~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~'~' ~ ° c ~ o '~ -- ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ .. ` ~- c ... ,-1 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y '~ (~ rO^ ~ e~ O V J ~ ~ ~ ~ b ~~~ )~ r r~ J b ~ ~ n o z ~~ ~\_,_/~ -~ -~- 7 ~) ~) ~_ C- ~,