HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1973/10/02 Item 18,.
CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF: October 2, 1973
AGENDA ITEM N0. [ 18 ]
ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing/Resolution - Ordering Formation of Open Space
District No. 2 of the City of Chula Vista and Approving the
Spread of Assessments I
INITIATED BY: Director of Public Works/City Engineer
RnrurRnirnm
The City Council on September 11, 1973, by Resolution No. 7011, declared
the intention to form Open Space District No. 2 of the City of Chula
Vista and set the date of October 2, 1973 for a public hearing to hear
protests to the formation of this district.
The description of the Open Space District is as follows:
A portion of the West Half of Fractional Section 13, Township 18
South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, according
to Record of Survey Map No. 3307, filed in the office of the
County Recorder of San Diego, State of California and lying within
Larkhaven Chula Vista Unit No. 1 Subdivision per Map thereof No.
7430, Larkhaven Chula Vista Unit No. 2 Subdivision per Map thereof
No. 7435, Larkhaven Chula Vista Unit No. 3 Subdivision per Map
No. 7590, and Larkhaven Chula Vista Unit No. 4 Subdivision per Map
No. 7591, records of said County, excepting therefrom Lot "A", Lot
"C" and pedestrian access.
The estimated first year's cost for maintaining the Open Space District
No. 2 is $7,029.84. The assessments have been spread equally among the
235 parcels lying within the district and amounts to $29.91 per parcel
per year.
A transparency of the Open Space District No.
available for Council viewing.
ATTACHED: Resolution [X] Ordinance [ ]
Financial Statement:
N.A.
Commission-Board Recommendation:
2 of Chula Vista is
Agreement [ ] Plat [ ]
See EXHIBITS [X] No. 1,2
Planning Commission, at their meeting of August 22, 1973, recommended
the establishment of Open Space District No. 2 of the City of Chula Vista.
Department Head Recommendation:
1. City Council order the formation of Open Space District No. 2 of the
City of Chula Vista.
2. City Council approve the spread of assessments.
City Manager Recommendation:
Concur
~i~~
Q
a ~-
.~
~ ~
z
Q
J
U ~
~ V
~ ~
0 0
~1.~ ~
V ~"
Q V
a.
w
z
W ~
LL
~ O
QI
~I
Q
Q
~,
~\
~-----
z
a~.
~,
pCQ2~0 p
oO~~QQ~Q
~v~~Q~ ~.
-.~~v~Q ~ O
J O~
v~io~aQQ'~n~0
~~JQ ~ a
~~v~Mp0~4
W W v
~Qp~~~QZ~
oW QoW
v~~~~Q ~~
v
o~~iv ,J ~
~~ ,vo~N~
~~a, o~
~W~ o~~~o
m
3Q~R~~Q~~N
~ ,Q ~,~ v
''~~o~JQ~pQ
o~~.~~.Q~~ o~
oN~~j~vQW~
~WjQ Q~~~~
Q~-oo~~~~~a
r
~\
c
z
0
V
Q
Z
~ AvE
c~ A~1A
M
~ ~ ~ ~
v ~ ,
.,
h S
~ w.
V
~,. `L N
0
w ~ ~
~ v
N
~ ~
V 1
Q
~ `~7 ~ N
~L~~ ~ N..
b
D 0~
~ N ~ ~ N N N ~ ~.'
Q .. `~;
N :L ~ NO1 ~1 "~
~ ~.
~ ~ N ~ N ~ oV.
N ~` p N H N Q ~ ~ ~:~
o N _ ~c h v ~, ~~
i ~ ~ ~ ~ a a ~ ~~: ~~
v _~ N N 1
Q~ ~ ~ ~ ~ AVE. ~ ~
~ N
.:h
N
x a~ ~ ^ ~
~~
~-\
Q
4 l
Z
~ ~,1
~ t~1
~f>
~l
' "~
~~
z \ l~
O
l~
~ " h
h
H ~
~ o.
b~
M
~ '~
N
~ ~
y
~fia.
b
v ~
~ ~V ,
h
~
W W
ti
~ ~
~ n Q
~ ~
Q
~`
a
~`
Q
~
~
~
~
~
s~
~
~
~
~
~
°
~
o
~
0
~
0
~
0
~
0
~
0
~ ~ o
o W
~ ~ o
_,
't
~r7N~n tr
Z..
i O
~ ~ ~•.
~ ,.
~/
a ~~/ d
~.
~[ v r.
. N~ -..
:....N N n
----
~
~
.~
~6
~
QO tV
Cq
. ~~
~ h
b
.•~
ao
b
b
,ooz=..~ : ~~d~sL~
~~~
.~ ~~
~l
~^
Q1
~~ ~
~^
.\
l~ ~
~ ~'
.~
~ ~ ~ ~ v
.~
~ ° ~1
c ~ ~ ~
O V ''~ ~ ,~
~ ~ •y
~ ~ ••
H °~ h
~ c ,~ ~
Q ~ ~
~ Q o Q ~ ~
W I
~ h
• N
..
v `
I •
v
Q
O
~t
Q
Q
Q
3
~
Q ~
Q
a
o `~
0
0 0
v v
~ o 0
Q
\ ~
V
Q
N
~ ~
~W
VZ
W~
~Q
~O
~~
o~
~~
Qj
Qo