HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 2012-009RESOLUTION NO.2012-009
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA CONSIDERING THE ADDENDUM (IS-11-001)
TO SECOND-TIER FEIR 02-02 AND APPROVING
AMENDMENTS TO THE OTAY RANCH GDP, OTAY RANCH
VILLAGE 2 SPA PLAN, AND ASSOCIATED REGULATORY
DOCUMENTS IN ORDER TO REALLOCATE 113 DWELLING
UNITS AMONG TEN NEIGHBORHOODS WITHIN VILLAGE
2
I. RECITALS
A. Project Site
WHEREAS, the area of land that is the subject of this Resolution is
diagrammatically represented in Exhibit A attached to and incorporated into this
Resolution, and commonly known as Village 2 Unit Transfer ("Project"), and for the
purpose of general description herein consists of 111.6 acres of the approximate 775 acres
located south of Olympic Parkway and west of La Media Road ("Project Site"); and
B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approvals
WHEREAS, a duly verified application was filed with the City of Chula Vista
Development Services Departrnent on April 5, 2011 by Baldwin and Sons, LLC
("Applicant, Owner, and Developer") requesting approval of amendments to the Otay
Ranch General Development Plan (GDP), Otay Ranch Village 2 SPA Plan and Otay
Ranch Village 2 Planned Community District Regulations and associated regulatory
documents affecting 111.6 acres ("Project"); and
C. Prior Discretionary Approvals
WHEREAS, development of the Project Site has been the subject matter of various
entitlements and agreements, including: 1) a General Development Plan and SPA Plan and
associated Design Guidelines, PFFP, WCP and AQIP and Comprehensive Affordable
Housing Plan previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 2006-156 on May 23,
2006; 2) Planned Community District Regulations and Land Use Districts Map approved by
City Council Ordinance No. 3036 on June 6, 2006; and 3) Tentative Subdivision Map
approved by City Council Resolution 2006-157 on May 23, 2006; and
Resolution No. 2012-009
Page 2
D. Environmental Determination
WHEREAS, the Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed
project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has
determined that the project was covered in previously adopted Final Second Tier
Environmental Impact Report (FEIR 02-02) for Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a
Portion of Village Four Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan. The Development Services
Director has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document
are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State
CEQA Guidelines calling for the prepazation of a subsequent document have occurred;
therefore, the Development Service Director has prepared an addendum to this document
FEIR 02-02; and
E. Planning Commission Record of Application
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing on the
Project, and notice of the hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in
a newspaper of general circulation in the City and its mailing to property owners within 500
feet of the exterior boundary of the Project Site at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the date and time
on which it was noticed, namely January 11, 2012, and voted 6-0-1 to forwazd a
recommendation to the City Council on the Project; and
WHEREAS, the proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning
Commission at the public hearing on the Project held on January 11, 2012, and the resulting
minutes and resolution aze incorporated into the record of this proceedings; and
F. City Council Record of Application
WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for the hearing on the Project
application and notices of said hearings, together with its purposes given by its publication
in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners within
500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the Project Site at least ten (10) days prior to the
hearing; and
WHEREAS, the duly called and noticed public hearing on the Project was held
before the City Council of the City of Chula Vista on January 24, 2012 in the Council
Chambers in the City Hall, Chula Vista Civic Center, 276 Fourth Avenue, at 4:00 p.m. to
receive the recommendations of the Planning Commission and to heaz public testimony
with regazd to the same.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista that it finds, determines, and resolves as follows:
Resolution No. 2012-009
Page 3
II. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA
The City Council finds that, in the exercise of their independent review and judgment, the
addendum to Second Tier FEIR-02-02 in the form presented, has been prepared in
accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and the
Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista and has considered
Addendum to Second-Tier FEIR-02-02.
III. GDP/SPA FINDINGS/ APPROVAL
A. THE SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN, AS AMENDED, IS IN
CONFORMITY WITH THE OTAY RANCH GENERAL DEVELOPMENT
PLAN AND THE CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN.
The proposed amendments to the Otay Ranch Village 2 SPA Plan reflect land uses
that are consistent with the Otay Ranch Village 2 General Development Plan and
the City of Chula Vista General Plan. The residential nature of the proposed unit
transfers would be consistent with the adopted medium-density residential
designation for the project site and compatible with the surrounding residential
densities of up to 15 du/ac and open space land uses of the Otay Ranch azea. The
transfer of 113 residential units from the westerly and southerly portion to the
northerly portion involving 111.6 acres would occur internally within the
boundaries of the approximate 775-acre project azea. The transferred units would
be located in closer proximity to the village core that provides for commercial and
public/quasi-public uses adjacent to transit, furthering the policy of the Otay
Ranch GDP that "Urban Villages" have "higher densities and mixed uses in the
Village Core ".
B. THE SPA PLAN, AS AMENDED, WILL PROMOTE THE ORDERLY
SEQUENTIALIZED DEVELOPMENT OF THE INVOLVED SECTIONAL
PLANNING AREAS.
The requested amendments to the Otay Ranch Village 2 SPA Plan rely on a
combination of the previously prepared and approved PFFP and the newly prepazed
supplemental PFFP to outline infrastructure required to serve the entire, previously
approved 2,786 unit project, along with the timing of installation and the financing
mechanisms to promote the sequentialized development of the project. The
requested transfer of 113 units will not affect the timeframes outlined in the
previous PFFP. Development of the 113 units will occur in an orderly,
sequentialized manner as outlined in the PFFP, as part of the overall development of
Otay Ranch Village 2, such that facilities are available at such time as needed.
C. THE OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 2 SPA PLAN, AS AMENDED, WILL NOT
ADVERSELY AFFECT ADJACENT LAND USE, RESIDENTIAL
ENJOYMENT, CIRCULATION OR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
Resolution No. 2012-009
Page 4
The proposed modifications to land use and development standard provisions
within the Project Site have been fully analyzed and will not adversely affect the
circulation system and overall land use as previously envisioned in the Otay
Ranch General Development Plan and Village 2 SPA Plan. The transfer of 113
units involving 111.6 acres would occur internally within the boundazies of the
approximate 775 acre project site. The existing infrastructure (sewer, water,
public services and facilities) has been determined to be adequate to serve the
proposed ] 13-unit transfer, as described in the supplemental PFFP. Additionally,
a Water Quality Technical Report has been prepazed, reviewed and approved by
the City Engineer, ensuring that the proposed project meets the required water
quality standards that are in effect. An Addendum to FEIR-02-02 has been
prepared and the Development Services Director has determined that any impacts
associated with the proposed amendments have been previously addressed in
FEIR-02-02; and thus, the requested amendments to the SPA will not adversely
affect the adjacent land uses, residential enjoyment, circulation or environmental
quality of the surrounding uses.
IV. APPROVAL OF GDP/SPA AMENDMENTS
Based on the findings above, the City Council approves the amendments to the Otay Ranch
GDP and Village 2 SPA Plan shown in Exhibits "B" and "C" attached hereto, and
Attachment "6", on file in the Office of the City Clerk, subject to the conditions set forth
below:
1. The Project shall comply with all mitigation measures specified in FEIR-02-02, to the
satisfaction of the Development Services Director.
2. Prior to approval of building permits for each phase of the Project, the Applicant shall
demonstrate that the air quality control measures outlined in the Otay Ranch Village 2
SPA Plan Addendum to the AQIP pertaining to the design, construction and operational
phases of the project have been incorporated in the project design.
3. Prior to the 30`h day after the Ordinance becomes effective, the Applicant shall prepare a
clean copy of the SPA Plan document by deleting all strike oub underlines and shading.
Where the document contains both an existing and proposed exhibit, the previous
existing exhibit shall be removed and substituted. In addition, the strike-out underlined
text, document format, maps and statistical changes within the Otay Ranch Village 2
SPA, PC District Regulations, Design Guidelines, WCP Addendum and AQIP
Addendum for the Village 2 Unit Transfer project shall be incorporated into the final
document and approved by the Director of Development Services for printing.
4. Prior to the 30`h day after the Ordinance becomes effective, the Applicant shall submit to
the Development Services Departrnent 10 copies and a CD of the approved amendment to
the Otay Ranch Village 2 SPA Plan, and PC District Regulations.
Resolution No. 2012-009
Page 5
V. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS
If any of the forgoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, and any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to the their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition the issuance of
future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigate or
compel the compliance or seek damages for violations of such conditions. No vested rights
aze gained by Applicant or successor in interest by the City approval of this Resolution.
VI. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION
It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon
enforceability of each and every term provision and condition herein stated; and that in the
event that any one or more terms, provisions or conditions are determined by the Court of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, if the city so determines in its
sole discretion, this resolution shall be deemed to be revoked and no further in force or in
effect ab initio.
Presented by Approved as to form by
~ _~
Gary Halber , .E., AICP Glen R. ogins i
Assistant C t Manager/Development Services ~ Atto y
Director
Resolution No. 2012-009
Page 6
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista,
California, this 24th day of January 2012 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers: Aguilaz, Bensoussan Castaneda, Ramirez and Cox
NAYS: Councilmembers: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers: None
ATTEST:
~.~ ~ ~~~
Donna R. Norris, CMC, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
t ^
4
Cheryl Cox, M or
I, Donna R. Norris, City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 2012-009 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a
regulaz meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 24th day of January 2012.
Executed this 24th day of January 2012.
,~.~,~
Donna R. Norris, CMC, City Clerk
Resolution No. 2012-009
EXHIBIT A
Resolution No. 2012-009
Page 8
Of¢y Ranch GDP/SRP o part ft
Legend
P~d,rlYwl
_ ~~
_ rr q~r~w
rr.~sa,r~ ®Yw,w~u~Ki
`IU.Irna.~Mwsw•.rvM r ~ ,wvr~
_w~~ s~rlnu l7JL uanlnorr~~
SO~IVYIrIrvrgY~~'Gpl,un~fyl ~e a ra
INreuJ
rnw,uiw,sM
~~~
VWR'OAnSMUlpl,n
® w• Ire
nm u.
u~rs.erwrnW r
. ~.
Proposed
Exh3k A7 Village Two Lantl Use Map
~
` _+
/ILLAGE
`
:';
,' f r,
`,
i r
..j-
f~:/=
0 4a0 80P 160U
Srak in ast
Exhibit B
Adopted October 28, 1993 Amended Jane 4, 7996 Amended November ]Q 1998 Page I26
Amended October 23, 2001 Amended December I3, 2005 Amended May 23, 2006
Amended December 20, 1011
Resolution No. 2012-009
Page 9
Monrente ~ Oray Rarvh Bwiness Pmk Sec:iond Planning A*en Plan
Gray FaKn Villag_s Two, Tutee aril a Portion of Faur II-Dewlrymen: Corcep[
a'f-!
a
R-6
h~Yrl
a R rt.~•f
tUyR«M R-D IINLY
f
~A~IW.1fFR/i / //~SFMI 1 SMlAK6ill
9 ~( !
~` -
-
R u
§ ~
~
. '
R-r R-% F.I N
y/ /\
\/ R
A
r ; ~ KPf~
R 19 LJ
F
Of R R
I R! R-gl ~~
R-Ih '
/i
~ Fs R!9
exan~sr.e Rte/ R-H
/ - Q P
nga.Fw R,% R-t
R-D R-1N
o R-i] R-F{ l
R-D
RifN R-ss
pyl _ AY i! i ,
R ~
4WV/I __ R,sp r+
•
North 4/AJdFr I/ R-1h ~~~
C
I qRf Ril R-N ~. ~, ~ ~h
~ ~~•/
I} .~/
n n ^
~J a x:~n. m.e.reee..r,e. evu
P SW' IMG {~MMMM p~M¢uie MFprwY
pmexlm[b batlon 8lpm R~ M~gtlM YrbnM~
W
NApWU1PlG. WmIGYWC
mW bLL
LEGEND
R Resitlentiel
S School
P Park
CPF Community Purpose Feality
OS Open Space
C Commercial
PO PubliNQuasl-Public
Exhibit C
Exhibit tOa
Montecito Site Utilization Plan
u-3u
Amended December 20, 301!
Resolution No. 2012-009
Page 10
Montecita Ed OtaY FarY31 Busirvcs Pmk Sectional Plnnrv'ng Aren Plan
Otay RarKh Vilhga Turo, Tnree arlZ a Portion of Frnn II-Deuelynnenx Concept
uNO use
9UMMART
NaIgMOSN000 ~'~ gclups OUS Ta
ISN
U
~
IY
9FpM hmlly
B_Aff SF ]i1 92 Sd
d1.5 160 3.0
1396 $E 214 9fl :.E
R-] sF 9 d 60 l]
ILGS 9E )~ 9fl S4
10.0 50 6.1
8 A8 SE Z1 il4 IP
133 101 )B
)2 d5 83
R-tBa 9F ]tj 85 6G
t1.e se
R-tse sF yy da 1
tad id
R-10 sF tae 83 1)
R$0 SF >S 3B
183 fl3 (3
R31 SF 23 B< RB
22 R
R23 SF yi,8 4fl yB
131 H 6d
R-zd sF 9y. $$ 3,$
).B dt 6d
R-TSe sF g5 (¢ •y9
R-RSO SF d0 24 g2
BS 88 ]T
1BB.] BBG 6.0
MYM1FFNnIIy
RS MF t5] t30 83
R-e MF ]2g ]2L LS
as 3G
nre MF u as ~z.s
11FB MF 5g !ifl tSQ
R-10 MF 65 g7 ,~p.y
80 '10.0
R-11 MF ~ ]ay 3a3
0.0 tdd 1d.5
W1T NF }a$ LS 1.t11
Rio 2B5 1TJ
R~13 M1F ]iLg t3 ]3y
109 uB tdS
R-td ks v1 tg;, ]pl
TB 13) 180
R-le MF 9,¢ 21 141
as )d zt.l
ns ma
R-TB MF yq ]5 g,2
88 BS
R3] MF ]_ _G BO
BB n0 tTS
R~RB MF 5„2 AG $$
50 BS tU
R-20 MF p B gT ]y
BB 15T 9.1
Rao MF ]p] ](¢ j]y
t0.0 t80 tL8
9u0toMl j$Q,Q t.B52 i~l_Q_
1N.8 1,]60 15.{
Mfrs] Wa
Mw Mu >g tG ,g
u et
MLL2 MU L< 1T
vd ee
MW ku da 3e ee
suerom =s w ~t
6.8
NalON0ortw00 LsnO Uaa gaaaBa UOa
CcTmwc151
GI CMaMftiBl 12:
11B
SYEbbI ](j
11.9
InOUatrlal
IN0.t IMYSYIeI yy
S1S
INUR IMY6NM !~fl
B)
INp.9 Irqusln0l jl~
~)
9uGrotal 906
eT.B
ua. i~ewrre w<+: meyn.6.wapN w~.Y aOaa aM CPB waa
etl la N
Wn emn~orm
sua eMl nurv eM SPAPoIIOa W
M1
~
a ~.,~. ..... wO,N~was.n
IM paYLn0111.
Park
P-1 Tam 54era 1d
POrc
P-3 PaM Tt
P-3 Pelk 8 8
Pd Pelk ~fl
4R
9uEb11 e
58.8
cPF•
WF-t WF 1.R
WF-3 CPF OB
(TF-3 CDF 1.]
WF-d WF is
C4F-S CPF OB
ONY
St StlvN 103
OpmsFxa OS ]$§.1
1843
W»MVe OS .','~
)d.)
FNVO Umakpnml FNUre $'t]
Ld oevekjMMn
E#. CtMNCO R83
IN. CtptlWm dR.B
9YOroMl ]~
510.)
TOMI 830.8 1]86
OtB.O
'M BtltlMp~Y 3 0 b 5 0 Bw WF We MII la poMap rMHn
MO NIIgO CIXB PYRwrM1IO B BWBpuwk SPA Anw Snail
Blue = SCR/Clerical Update
Pink =Proposed Amendment
Exhibit C
Exhibit 10b
Montecito Site Utilization Plan
Q-31
Amended December 20, 20l]