Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1971-6082Jennie M. Fulasz, City Clerk P. O. Box 1.087 Chula Vista, California 92(312 R:GSOL'JTIOid i10. g~g~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C'_"TY OF CHULA VISTA DE`T'ERMINING THE AMOUiv'T OF P^ZOT?E~ WHICH SHOULD L'E ASSESSED AGAINST' THE POTEN`1~IAL SERVICE AREA TO BE I:NOWN AS THi' DATE--FAIVRE TRUNK SEWER ASSESSMENT SERVICE AREA AND THE A'IETHOD 0~' LEVYING Z'HE ASSESSMENT WIiICII SHALL BE COLLECTED PRIOR `T'0 TI-IE CONNECTION O"r' ANY DWELLING UNITS OR OTHER BUILDINGS BY MEANS OF LATErALS AND SEWER MAIN EXTENSIONS TO TiiE DATE-FAIVRE SEGv'ER LIi1E The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby resolve as follows: WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista and the Montgomery Sanitation District, pursuant to a joint powers agreement, twill cause to be con- structed a trunk sewer known as the Date-r'aivre trunk sewer line pursuant to plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer, and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared a recommendation setting forth the anon to be benefitted by said t_run;t sewer line and the method of assessing developments within said area f.or repayment for the costs of said Date-Faivre truck sewer line, and G^7HEREAS, said reco~mmendaticn of the City Engineer, dated June i, 1971, and attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated. herein by refer- ence as it set forth in full, which recommendation has been filed with the City Council and is on file in the office of the City Clerk, and ;:' . ~, . Tn'HEREAS, said recor,~~raendation delineates the area to be benefitted, the sum of money to be paid To the City of Chula Vista prior to any sewer connections by meads of laterals and sewer main extensions to said trunk sewer and the method o.f spreading said assessment over the service area, and WHEREP:S, the recommendation of the City Engineer, on the basis of actual and estimated costs, will be the sum of $212,021.00 plus costs cf maintenance of records for a total sum of $214,521.00 to be spread through- Oilt the as:>E55ment SeV1Ce arei~ in 1~I"te :C_=:;Iliier ,~'.~t fi;~"~i: irl EX?"ii:~.~..i_ "?;" a:i attached 'Hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista as fellows: 1. That the construction~of said Date-Faivre trunk sewer line will. benefit that area designated as the Date-Faivre assessment service area as shown in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by referer:ce as if set forth in full. 2. That the recommendations of the City Engineer as filed with the City Clerk are hereby approved acid adopted, and tree sum of $214, 521.OC~ is hereby es.tablisried as the amount to be assessed against dwelling units and ether buildings as a result of the benefit received by said buildings, which stun of money shall be paid to the City of Chula Vista in accordanc with the method established by said Exhibit "A" prior to any connection s. ,., _ ~ _ ~ .. ~ L . fl -. 1... _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ ~ ,. _ _ a,.~ _ .., n__a, l.,J ti~lll~ t~~~\..V i..V L ~-~. i./l.: l~V 1G1~11G .^. 11:l~ J._: YV l.:1 1~iiC G:7 t-}1 llV lU~U 1J1 V1lA .i laGil V~` ~~ No. 405 as adopotecl or. amPr,de~ , ~~~~ ~ti~ - 1. - a -~ ~.<<. ~.: ~r~_ F ~ , .. ---- -- .. J .. ~ ~ NO FEE `~` _r~ ',~.~_„ Res. +vC~d`'~ ,~' .. v BE IT FtTRTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk of the City of h Chula Vista be, and she is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this resolution in the office of the County Recorder, County of San Diego, State of Califorrnia.. Presented by Approved as to form by _ - ,__ ~ _ _ (s) Lane F. Cole r '. ~ ' Lane F. Cole, Director of George D-.'Lindberg, City Attorne~ Public Works ADOPTED AND APPgOVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF C~;ULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this $th day of-~ ~~~ __^, 1971, by the following vote, to-wit: AYES- Councilmen Hyde, Bgdahl, Scott, Habel, Hamilton NAYES : Councilmen None ABSEPIT : Councilmen None ATTEST (s) Jennie M. Fulasz City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss. CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) (s) Thomas D. Hamilton, Jr. Mayor of the City of Chula Vista I, Jennie M. Fulasz , City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, California DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above is a full, true and ccrrect r_.ony of Resolution No. 6082 , and that the same has not been amended or repealed. DATED_ June 8, 1971 ~ ~ J City Clerk G - 2 - ~-eS, ~ 0 ~ 2 RESOLUTION N0. 6082 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF MONEY WHICH SHOULD BE ASSESSED AGAINST THE POTENTIAL SERVICE AREA TO BE KNOWN AS THE DATE-FAIVRE TRUNK SEWER ASSESSMENT SERVICE AREA AND THE D4ETHOD OF LEVYING THE ASSESSMENT WHICH SHALL BE COLLECTED PRIOR TO THE CONNECTION OF ANY DWELLING UNITS OR OTHER BUILDINGS BY MEANS OF LATERALS AND SEWER MAIN EXTENSIONS TO THE DATE-FAIVRE SEWER LINE The City Council of the City of_ Chula Vista does hereby solve as follows: WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista and the Montgomery Sanitation ..strict, pursuant to a joint powers agreement, will cause to be con- -ructed a trunk sewer known as the Date-Faivre trunk sewer line pursuant ~ plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer, ~d WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared a recommendation setting ~rth the area to be benefitted by said trunk sewer line and the method ~- assessing developments within said area for repayment for the costs said Date-Faivre truck sewer line, and WHEREAS, said recommendation of the City Engineer, dated June 1, a71, and attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by refer- zce as it set fortYi in full, which recommendation has been filed with the qty Council and is on file in the office of the City Clerk, and WHEREAS, said recommendation delineates the area to be benefitted, he sum of money to be paid to th.e City of Chula Vista prior to any sewer onnections by means of laterals and sewer main extensions to said trunk ewer and the method of spreading said assessment over the service area, nd WHEREAS, the recommendation of the City Engineer, on the basis of ctual and estimated costs, will be the sum of $212,021.00 plus costs of aintenance of records for a total sum of $214,521.00 to be spread through- ut the assessment service area in the manner set forth in Exhibit "A" as ttached hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City Chula Vista as follows: 1. That the construction of said Date-Faivre trunk sewer line will Benefit that area designated as the Date-Faivre assessment service area as shown in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference _s if set forth in full. 2. That the recommendations of the City Engineer as filed with _Yie City Clerk are hereby approved and adopted, and the sum of $214,521.00 s hereby established as the amount to be assessed against dwelling units end other buildings as a result of the benefit received by said buildings, which sum of money shall be paid to the City of_ Chula Vista in accordance with the method established by said Exhibit "A" prior to any connection -~eing made to the Date-Faivre trunk sewer line as provided in Ordinance Jo. 405 as adopoted or amended. - 1 - _ r BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk of the City of 'hula Vista be, and she is hereby authorized and directed to record a °ertified copy of this resolution in the office of the County Recorder, 'ounty of San Diego, State of California. resented by Approved as to form by ,: ~ 1 sane F. Cole, Director of George D~' Lindberg, City Attorr~~ public Works ADOPTED AND APPROVED by the CITY COUNCIL of VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 8th day of June -ollowing vote, to-wit: ;YES : Councilmen Hyde, Egdahl, Scott, Hobel, Hamilton ~1AYES : Councilmen None ABSENT: Councilmen None ATTEST( -,~ ~ ~'~ City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss. CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) the CITY OF CHULA 1971, by the /_. _-_-- _ ~ -t--- ~ ayor of the City of Chula Vista I~ City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, California DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. and that the same has not been amended or repealed. DATED City Clerk to ~~ ~' __ , - 2 - RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY F'~T('I'~F~"? nr(`zyrrr~,r~., r~pny••1 ~~~, ;.~ rt,r, ~ ,-. ~ n~ 1 , Howard Lesley, City Inrrineer of tote City of Chul•-1 Vi^t~-~, hereby z~resent my recn~r endatiorl to the City Council rec~ardinn r_e~ayri,ent of construct°~r r_. the li,stc~llation of the ! ~ ~r1~- ost^ fir F,~IVPE T 'i,..,I.,_ ~?,• ~•~-. as <~elineatec' on t?~c atta.c'~e~? c~ i_ a c arT~ . - . `}:~' subject sewer is clesignec for t}.e dual i`unctions of pr~vic?i.ncr rPl~e~f ~'or the exi.~ti.ng sewer in rain treet, and, to provide reserve capacity to t}~~ e~•tent of one million cj~-r]-lops per c?ay, ~ the avera e flo~,~ for use '~v t,.~ ~it~, nn lanes h~~.^~r,r7 Churl Vista 'ervi_ce .TrAa as defined in t'~e .'lrrr.ee, ent (.-7n~? ~-zn.~,n.a..,Q c~ntgon~ery ; ani.tation District. nts) ~~'ith thr~ t elineated on the <iiacrra.r~ ser~J~ed throu~~h the provision ~m the basis of actual anc? esti; ~~~te~' c-osts T be made a:.7ainst e:3c~, d~•~ellincr unit, nr ef~uivalent the subject se•.,~er. ''aynlent of such asses.^=~•ent i~ nection t~ t}:c se~~er systeT•~ of t}le Cit~,~. !_~~to -- ~- /97~ - and f~~~V(? ~?E-'tf'r!'~ln~r~ t},e ~'~CCaGCr~~nt- ~n th`'r~t~f , ~•'h1c-t, ?np1 2e~ to tltl l l Zf to he ~.-~de prior tc, *~~,>-;.,~. ^~r- T y City rnn2neer Lc.~~}~tec? by ~zesolution '10, on to Determination of .';pplica}ale Costs I_'ayrients to <late "Future` portion per a~xr_ee~~,ent `'1.23.631 -~I;~ & ~.~~alle IOp,Onrl y to .ain (12 enuivalent) 46,16 ~'alr~ & ,alley to '_ain rir}:t of ~•.ay 7,000 7 F , 7'~ H._isec] upon flo~:~ figures shown in L'~ble i of rx}lii~~it Y ~• to the agr.ee,.~ent ~:ith the "ontnor~er•:, ~-, of t}-~e I'ourt,. nn;er.~ment t~4 of the above total. cost is attri}~utable tonreliefnrertuirer..~erlts~,~arV, ~t-~1~. ~~ for reserve capacity. "'herefore, t},e area to },c~ ~ 7~-F4 tc+ r~rcvs.s° • ~ ~n s X11 Lear ?6,6° of x`276,791 or ~212,02I ~~s thn axzplic;zble„~c-nn~tre~'`~rve cal7`~c;t,. rucfi~.on cofit. :<~cor:cls and adr:i.ni.stration ? s esti~~atec' to total 52.,50. Construction S2I?,~?1 ~-e cord s ? ,, 5 0 (1 TOT? h 1`PFLIC c214 ~ 5? 1 c~tEr~ ination o~ ~:u:~~~~er of ~~,~ - -----~-- i~ e112:1r~ ~ n;_tc tO t n --- - -- :~e ~~erV..C? _.F serve cap~zc.ity per t}:e .~lJo~>e re'-erc~ncef "Fnur_t'~~_ ~~ P. ,~~, t.~e e~ui°.-alent of 1.0 r . '' o (^tr(±raae) . Per Capita flr• (.~~•-~) 80 ry.n~c,da Persons per d~.'ellinn unit 3.75 Twerage floT.- per d~•.•ellinr unit = 300 ~~,~,,,~, ~?~:el linc; units ~~,>}~i.c}: ray be served 1,0 300 De~er~in~~tion of Initial 'Dotal applicab; Dwelling units i .GAD. -.-_..~___ = an•~roxir,atel~.,~ 3,300 d~-clli_rn units, n.n.c?. Cost per ~.~ellinn T'nit D ~e.~ t ~ ``214 , 521 x65.'!0 serve? 3300 is that area ~~-hich ~~:~ill potenti~~lly },P ~:c~.,efited for reserve ~~pacit~, ?,~.zilt into t`:e ~ii'.,i~,ct se~»r, ~~ ~C s~. ~-v~F . 20p0 I a~ ~y f T~ /~ a~ i ~ ~~ /~ ~~ ~ \ s ""FE > ` r l W,q / N ~~ • ~~ ~ ~J ~a ~C a`' y a~ ~~. , F ~,_ y4C F ~~ s, ~~; ~~~ ~~/ ti ~\/ /~ / ~ r-s ~~~. ,~- ~FFh'~9v `` ~d~ y~~I ~ ~Y ~ ~ ~~~ y ,/ ~ iNO~ sr'~~gL a y a Bc vo. ^a~ ~o ~a ~~ NAT/OVAL AVE. ~~~ ~1 ~~ `~ `~~ `~~• `~ ~ y I /~ /~ 3 7N AVE. T y go a ~ ~~ 4TH ,4VE. ' 3R0 AVE. 1 -- ~', Z a ~J, p 2N0 ! ASE. ~~~~ Cp~~~~ ~~~ ~.~ N/LL TOP O F ~~ `c~,y SANS` c 1 \ A O'er ~ ~ ~ ~`` ~~ ~~a J ~ ~J 3T AVE. OR. ~ 3 `Ao A4CNdE s ~y ,~/ 1-- COs O GLEAN pER •~~'~., ~ •: ~~\. ~~'ENUE T •• . '• ~ F- ~ o•~'.p ~~Py `~ ti r~ ~ J B~ SsF •~ Q~ r~.~ .S..i~ ~ """ay ~,,, ~ ~,' .. i"~~ T., i • Y r ~ •yT r ;;' s ~.~ ~ ;,;, '^,, ;,,y, ~~, "i,~ l Y~w •~ ~Fv ~ • r . f( /~~~~-70 GENERAL ~~'AN DATE-FA/IRE o~aoo^ ~-~ ~ ~-1 r---J I '~----, L TRUNl~I SEl~t/ER y < ~ ~' y A SSE SSME~1/ T D/A GRAM ? ~ \ ~' ----- /~~(~ /y~(~ Q -JSSE SSME,VT_ p/4GRAM ~a 42 _ ---_--' ~LS, `-„~V~ ~~T/ OF ? Be yE,Q ~ w y / °E< ~ f • . ~.t - rf+~t' ''t /' nt __ t0 ~~C adc~P, 1ntP .. _ ; ~l cost :per d~,zellinq unit t..er ~~me ,_ibc,•f:• ynit_; of the a,,se,,.,. nt t~a~, ~, ~„r--- • t :c of payr ent ,~ , nu~._rterly dnnu, to k)e charcic'e' ut tl' e ~ .-or'~ . +- SuY~ eCt ~,ewC'r. `li.E_'. lIl'terE'-St 1S t0 1"rf_' Cc'IICU1c tC'C on c~ ~, lie 7 ~? s}za11 i.ncl~,'e tf,:e tc~t~lr Ant per ~f f_ul ]_ rtlarters f,. encing Januar~~~ 1, 1.972 an ~ cf tote as._e , uch -~~~t~ through the date of n~.•,~' •ent uivalency Factors ~,.~,~ r. Unit ~q ------- ti,n ~d~u.. ..~~~e.llin_~g ~_,_ - interest r ~~ri~r to cnr~r~ut~ti_on of ss.~,ll set f~rt~~ `~el~~,. The cost ~>er <'.~.~ellincr unit ~;,x,nlicahle f.~ctor %~`~ ;~tlrough .<<ultiplyin<' such cost by the ~-TrTnP 'I'YPT~ amity d~aellin~:, unit in <~ '.~tzildinc~ containing (<-,~ For each f - or in ~ l;uildi.nn con- nct ...ore t?~an three such u~y if such units arc' ; ntendec? 1.0 y nur~'.~_~er of unit_ ... .... - taininr, an . •........••'• ;dual o~.~nershin. • • . . • - for : nc.iv~ ~'or eac'z family d~~'o11in<~ unit in a buildinaarennotnina ~. ~n f`) - :uore than three such units --:here the unit" .•• for individual o~.mershit~... • • • • .... tenCleu - n • hn .... •' "' ~,... TIaCE'. .. • • '' (~) For each mobile h~r:e s cor.~mercial SC:~001`-~ , 1ndLlStrl.al U`'E'`' ~ h cr ~,,, at,~~,7e ~ ~;; } For churche._ f ~ s eci f ie~~ in a usc. s or ant' othc Mateo not p ti a 03 , e uivalency s.i<~11 be individually esta`~~lishec? the c3 ~.:•it~Z reef ion 2 _ . :;v tY.e C'-t'a i;n<rineer in accordance vara-;ra_~h . o~ t}ie :'.unicinal Code. ~_,. -~_,, enz l k n • of =., .. r (~ ~ : i U 1 1 C a ~ 1 11 t y .__._~.- -' :~ C~__ __~... _~.--- '~ C1 t~ t` 7" C``~ F~ `" 1' ' F~ <' r ,~,~~ assessr ent`; yet fort}: ~•_erc'i n ..hall ~,~, attachec, di~tt-*rZ ~ r ^~ ,~., ~~i r+-r," "service areawhetherlthrou~h gravity flow, by pumping. ~.dj,.~c~~nt to the •-<<.:er ~ s~,2°~~~ h~; the sul_~jcct - of lane' r,rac:inc?. (s 0 ~~ {: ,. Re>, SO d 2 '.When recorded, please return to: ~'ennie M. Fulasz, City Clerk P. O. Box 1087 -(hula Vista, California 92012 RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY ENGINFE?? PrrAPP,I„r -T~Tr,C;D C?F ??I;PI`_Y.'"F?.1T ^tl? ^ar.., ~~~cm {gyp T?'i-' DATE-FriV?'T, ",t'•':_. ~C'`. ``. ~''~~ I, Cloward Gesley, City Engineer of the City of Chula Vista, hereby r~resent my r~cornn~endation to the City Council regarding repayment of construct~.nn, costs fnr the inst<~llation of the C'%TE-FT.IVP,E T^LT'4?' ~r,'~p as delineated on tha attached cliagrarn. 1'he subject sewer is designed for the dual functions of providing relief for the existing sewer in Pain Street, and, to provide reserve capacity to the es•tent of one million gallons per day, average flow, for use by t•r,A City on tam's he«c~nd the Chula Vista Service Prea as defined in the agreement (and aTMens?ments) wit!, t`~e iontgon~ery Sanitation District. Ielineated on the c?iagrar~ is that area ~~~hich ~:~ill potentially be benefited an:~ served through the provision for reserve canacit~~ hiiilt into the subject see>>pr. C:m the basis of actual and estir~ater co^>ts 7 have determines' the aGGPSSment to be made against each dwelling unit, or equivalent thernof_, ~,rhic?^ ~nnlies to utili2e the subject se~4~er. Payment of such assess^~ent is to be made x~rior to making con- nection to the se;,er system of the City. Late - / 97/ DY= City Engineer F:dopteci by Resolution :do. ~Q~~ on ~~~~~' /97n , 1. Determination of Applicable Costs Payments to date 5123,631 "Future" portion per agreement 100,000 ---, T alto & 'alley to i:ain (12 " equivalent) 46 ,160 halm & Valley to 'gain right of way 7,000 ~~ Based upon flow figures shown in Table I of Exhibit I of the "c'ourt',. Tmens?r+ent to the agreement with the ontgomery ~'anitation District, apnroxi~ate~v ?~,ds of the above total cost is attributable to relief requirements, anc) 75.6Q to nrc+vi.si.,ons~ for reserve capacity. Therefore, the ~•rrea to be served by the reserve canacit~~ •..~ill hear ?6.6% of ;`276,791 or $212,021 as the aoplicahle ron-•t-ructon cost. Records and administration is estimated to total $2,500, Construction $212,021 Records 2,500 TOTI`L P_PPLIC? -: - SST . 221 =etEr:.ination of •;ur.~er of Dtaelli;-rn "-nits to he CPr'ved ~.eserve capacity per the a;~ove re'=er~nced "Fourth ": endment" enual~ 1 .Q '".f .~:'. r~ ~~;) ~..hic~i is the erui~Talent of I.0 .~'.~'. (3veraae). Per Capita flh•- (~~'±-.) = 80 n.~.c.d. Persons per d~aellina unit 3.75 Average flo~..~ per dwelling unit 300 <-+.r~.s~. ~~•;el lin<; units which may be served 1.0 ?". G. D. ~ an*~roxir,ately 3,30(1 d~:-ellinrf uni_ts_._ 300 g.p.d. Deter. ~ination of Initial Cost per TM:~rellincx Cnit ~~'otal applicable cost = `'214 , 521 _ $65.00 Do~elling units serves? 3,300 ^ :^ "`'FSSl~E'dT DIAGR.Tu? xi42 ~~. do~-~ ~' (~ ~ ~-. Sheet- 1 of 3 s~ ~ 4~F ~ .2000 a~ ~y a~ ' C ~~ ~~ / Y ~ C~ ~~ ~y ~ ~ s ~~ ~ `~ ~~J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ ,,,~ '~ ~~~ ~'~ ~ 1~ .~+N. ~~ "N, yh ~ \ J~ii,t ~~ \ ~~ o.~ • . 'v"' ^~. ~~ ~- f ~ ~~~~~~ y ~~-70 GEA/E,PAL PLp / FA/IRE yz~~~ ENT D/AGR~4A~I ~ ~ ~ I ~ :~ ~Fti ~ ..J ~ I I ~--- .J ~. -.r ~.. - L 4t, .~ 1. ... V t_~:c .u`~~ ~ ~_nit~.:~i crest r,er d~~.`c~11.i.nq >>n~.fi ti~eYF~ ~,~ ; a ~- _1 aI1nU, t'~~ ~'t' C~l~:r~'E"' ci't tl"'C'_ of i1c~~'iC?nt of t}~n c~SSC?S^m(~11t t~l"iC~T' {'!"~ t;pif'~fv ~;n•-~,.~~ %..`;' ri7L UI:,1!-'Ct ~E„~-'C'r. l:.C' 1ntCrC?St 1. .5 t0 t"E' Cc11CUZ~t(?('' On ~ !'!'il~'rtE~rl~' ?`?~•^ ~' ~••-'' ~_ :..E?nc~_nu ~anuar~~ 1 1`_?~2 anc3 s'~ali incl'~~~~~ tz,~, ! n ~ ~~- a tot<-r l nu~r per ~~f fu'- 1 ?1 rfiers , .. ~~ suer: ~~t~ throuci: t}-_e date of pr~~;~~~r~nt ~f the ,~s~e~~~,c'nt• 5~ 1~~~ellinu L~nit__'c?uivalency Factors the cost ~~er s%~,:ellincr unit shrill, -:rimer to cor,nutaticn of interest, '~e ad~u~-fi~ throucr?~: .,,ulti,~lyinu such cost by the -~r~olicahle f<~ctor. as set. f~^rt~~ '~~el~•.~- TY~~r- j`T,rmnv (~.;} For each farlily dti~~ellin:~ unit in ~~ `~uilc?inc~ containing not r,~,ore th_~n three such units - or in , huildinn con- tai.ninr, any nur,~k~er of units if such unit; are ?ntendec? ~Or ~nCi1V1C111a1 ownE'r~hlne.•.e.•.•.•.e••.•...•.•••.•.•. 1.0 (` ? ?'or eac`i family dv,:~ellins7 unit in a building containing :gore titan three such units ~:~here the unit. are not in- tenue~ for. individual o~,~nership•.........•............ n,~~ (c} For each mobile hone space..........e.....e........... 0.6~ (~:) For churet:es, schools, industrial u^e~-, eoTM!mcrcial uses or any other use not specifies' in a, b nr c a~~ove, the equivalency rate shrill be indi~~idually est<-~hlishec? .~y the Cite I:n~7ineer in accordance a;ith `'ection 26.403, ~~~~ra:;rapt, _ of t'ie :"unici~al Code, 6. ~:~~plica:il.ity of ;.sscss' ent ~._~ <~s:~ess,,~ents ;:=et forth i:erein shall ~E? <~nnlicahle to anV nrnn~rt-~A~-, ~~~.t~?~ c :~dj:~cent to the "service area" as delineated upon the attached c?i~-~nram, ~~~hi.c^h aYn s,r-.~eu .~~~~ the subject -ewer, whether through gravity flow, by pumping, or '~~v vir+-7 :~f lane; crag;incr. r-* L - .