Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012/01/24 Item 14CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ~~~ CITY OF CHULA VISTA JANUARY 24, 2012 Item ~ ~}- ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER 1) PCM 11-05/06 AMENDMENTS TO THE OTAY RANCH GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 2 SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN, PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS AND ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS; AND 2) FOUR TENTATNE MAPS (PCS 11-02, 11-03, 71-04, AND 11-OS), ASSOCIATED WITH THE REALLOCATION OF 113 RESIDENTIAL UNITS WITHIN OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 2. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERING THE ADDENDUM (IS-I1-Ol) TO SECOND-TIER FEIR 02- 02 AND APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE OTAY RANCH GDP, OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 2 SPA PLAN AND ASSOCIATED REGULATORY DOCUMENTS IN ORDER TO REALLOCATE 113 DWELLING UNITS AMONG TEN NEIGHBORHOODS WITHIN VII,LAGE 2. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE OTAY RANCH Vll,LAGE 2 PC DISTRICT REGULATIONS AND LAND USE DISTRICT MAP FOR NEIGBBRHOODS R-4B, R-6, R-8B AND R-9B. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A TENTATIVE SUBDNISION MAP WITHIN OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 2 -CVT 11-02. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP WITHIN OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 2 -CVT 11-03. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP WITHIN OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 2 -CVT 11-04. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A TENTATNE SUBDIVISION MAP WITHIN OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 2 -CVT 11-05. SUBMITTED BY: ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER/ I CTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERV CES ~ G • K• REVIEWED BY: CITY MANAGER 14-1 January 24, 2012 Item _~_ Page 2 of 20 4/STHS VOTE: YES ~ NO SUMMARY Baldwin & Sons, LLC ("Applicant" or "Developer") is proposing to reallocate 113 previously approved residential units/lots within the Otay Ranch Village 2/Village of Montecito & Otay Ranch Business Pazk Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan ("Village 2 SPA Plan"). In order to do so, the Otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP), the Village 2 SPA Plan, the associated Planned Community (PC) District Regulations, and the Village Design Plan components must be amended. In addition, an addendum to the Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP) must be approved, and an addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) must be considered. The project also includes four new Tentative Maps to accommodate the 113-unit reallocation ("Village 2 Montecito Unit Transfer"). On April 5, 2011, the applicant filed applications to process all of the subject items. BACKGROUND Otav Ranch GDP In October of 1993, the City Council and San Diego County Boazd of Supervisors adopted the City of Chula Vista Otay Ranch GDP and the County Otay Subregional Plan (SRP). The GDP/SRP governs the 23,000+ acre Otay Ranch Properties. The Otay Ranch GDP is based upon, and directly implements, the City of Chula Vista General Plan. The Otay Ranch GDP includes plans for urban villages, a resort community, the Eastern Urban Center, industrial azeas, rural estate planning areas, and a university. Since its adoption in 1993, the GDP was amended in 1998, in 2005 (as part of City Council's adoption of the City of Chula Vista's Comprehensive General Plan Update), and most recently in May 2006 to address Village-specific planning issues. Village 2 SPA Plan The Village 2 SPA Plan and Tentative Map (PCS 06-OS) were approved on May 23, 2006.. The Village 2 SPA Plan accommodates up to 2,786 dwelling units in a variety of urban and semi-urban residential products. While the greatest residential densities and mixture of uses surround the village core, the Village 2 SPA Plan also incorporates a series of residential neighborhoods organized around neighborhood parks. Residents within these neighborhoods will be within walking distance of multiple parks, community purpose facilities, and a variety of commercial uses. Minor Substantial Conformance Review (SCR) requests were approved on February 15`n and December 13, 2007, respectively which allowed unit transfers within several neighborhoods. These minor SCRs did not require GDP or SPA Amendments. 14-2 January 24, 2012 Item Page 3 of 20 Since the approval of the Village 2 SPA Plan and Tentative Map in 2006, market conditions have changed for single-family residential development. Due to structural shifts in the economy affecting the real estate sector and mortgage mazkets, demand has increased for "small lot" homes with lot sizes around 3,000 square feet and lessened for traditional single family lazger homes (as previously approved) with lot sizes around 4,000 or 5,000 square feet. As a result, the applicant is requesting amendments to the Village 2 SPA Plan, including four associated Tentative Maps, to allow for construction of alternate housing products that are in line with today's marketplace conditions and homebuyer preference. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project was covered in previously adopted Final Second Tier Environmental Impact Report, Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four SPA Plan (FEIR 02-02). The Development Services Director has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the Development Service Director has prepared an addendum to FEIR 02-02. RECOMMENDATION 1. Consider the Addendum to FEIR 02-02; 2. Adopt a Resolution approving amendments to the Otay Ranch GDP, and the Village 2 SPA Plan and supporting regulatory documents in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein; 3. Adopt an Ordinance approving amendments to the PC District Regulations and Land Use District Map, in accordance with the findings contained therein; and, 4. Adopt a Resolution approving Tentative Map CVT 11-02 in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein; 5. Adopt a Resolution approving Tentative Map CVT I1-03 in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein; 6. Adopt a Resolution approving Tentative Map CVT 11-04 in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein; and 7. Adopt a Resolution approving Tentative Map CVT 11-OS in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION On January 11, 2012 the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend to the City Council approval of the proposed Project. 14-3 January 24, 2I0/L12 Item ~ Page 4 of 20 DISCUSSION 1. Location, Existing Site Characteristics, and Ownership The Village 2 SPA Plan azea is located adjacent to and south of Olympic Parkway, adjacent to and north of the Wolf Canyon Preserve, adjacent to and east of the future Heritage Road extension, and adjacent to and west of La Media Road (see Locator Map). Portions of the Village are currently vacant and generally comprised of rolling terrain devoid of natural vegetation due to historic farming activities. Other portions of the site are partially graded, and yet others are developed or currently under development. Neighborhoods within the Village with projects in progress (independent from the proposed project) inc]ude R-5, R-7, R-9a, R-12, R-13, R-14, and R-30. These neighborhoods aze being developed with a vaziety of product types, including detached and attached residential units, and alley loaded, single-family homes. Village 2 includes approximately 775 acres under multiple ownerships (See Exhibit A in Attachment 6). Proposed amendments to the Village 2 SPA Plan represent properties owned by Baldwin & Sons, LLC and affiliated companies. The 10 neighborhoods subject to the proposed GDP and SPA amendments comprise approximately 111.6 acres. The areas of the four Tentative Maps comprise approximately 284.7 acres and include more neighborhoods than the 10 neighborhoods affected by the proposed unit transfer associated with the GDP and SPA amendments. Although the proposed SPA amendments are only for a portion of Village 2, some planning issues, particulazly context, community structure and infrastructure, must be evaluated in the context of the overall planning area. This report describes the SPA Plan and contextual issues as part of the following discussion of each applicable SPA Plan component. 2. Project Description The project proposes reallocating 113 residential units within 10 neighborhoods of the Village 2 SPA Plan. Specifically, a total of 113 residential units would be removed transferred from the approved unit count of the following seven `donor' neighborhoods: R-4b (30-units), R-20 (8-units), R-23 (23-units), R-24 (13-units), R-25a (10-units), R-25b (10-units), and R-27 (19-units). These 113 residential units would then be added/transferred to three `receiver' neighborhoods: R-6 (63-units), R-8 (27-units), and R-9b (23-units) (see Unit Transfer Graphic, page 2 of GDP/SPA Booklet, Attachment 6). Neighborhood R-8 would be divided into R-8a (48-units) and R-8b (29- units) to differentiate product type. The existing total unit count for the Village 2 SPA Plan would remain unchanged (zero net change) as a result of the proposed project. This proposed density transfer is described in greater detail in the "Proposed Amendments" section below. The recipient neighborhoods - R-6, R-8a, and R-9b - are among a number of neighborhoods located in Village 2 North that were graded and had partial utilities installed in 2006. Due to a significant economic downturn, the build out of these parcels was not completed. Based on current market conditions, the product types originally anticipated for these neighborhoods aze no longer economically viable. The Applicant is proposing detached homes on lots that aze smaller in size and slightly higher in density 14-4 January 24, 2012 ~ r~ Item r ~+- Page 5 of 20 than those originally proposed to align these neighborhoods with current marketplace conditions. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: The following is a brief summary of the proposed amendments to the Otay Ranch GDP and Village 2 SPA Plan. The unit transfers are depicted on page 2 of the proposed GDP and SPA Plan amendments booklet entitled "Otay Ranch Village of Montecito General Development Plan and Sectional Planning Area Plan Amendments" (See Attachment 6). Otay Ranch GDP: Amend applicable text, tables, and exhibits to reflect changes in single-family and multi-family housing distributions and implement the proposed housing product in R-6, R-8a, R-8b and R-9b. Village 2 SPA Plan: a. Amend applicable text, tables, and exhibits to reflect changes in single-family and multi-family housing distributions and implement the proposed housing product in R-6, R-8a, R-8b and R-9b. b. Rezone R-4b neighborhood from SF3 zone to SF2 (single-family) c. Rezone R-6 neighborhood from SF4 to RMl (multi-family) d. Amend R-8 neighborhood designation to R-8a and R-8b e. Rezone R-8b neighborhood from SF3 to RMl. R-8a neighborhood remains SF3 f. Rezone R-9b neighborhood from SF4 to RMl g. Amend open space requirements for small lot detached single family in the RMl zone Four (4) associated Tentative Maps: Zero net change in number of units. a. R-6: Amend lotting to increase by 63 lots b. R-8a/R-8b/R-9b: Amend lotting to increase by SO lots Amend R-8a/R-8b lotting to increase by 27 lots Amend R-9b lotting to increase by 23 lots c. R-4b (Donor `A'): Amend lotting to decrease by 301ots d. R-20, R-23, R-24, R-25a, R-25b, R-27 (Donor `B'): Amend lotting to decrease by 83 lots Amend R-20 lotting to decrease by 8 lots Amend R-23 lotting to decrease by 23 lots Amend R-24 lotting to decrease by 13 lots Amend R-25a lotting to decrease by 10 lots Amend R-25b lotting to decrease by l O lots Amend R-271otting to decrease by 19 lots 14-5 January 24, 2012 Item ~ C}- Page 6 of 20 ANALYSIS 1. Otav Ranch GDP The Chula Vista General Plan and the Otay Ranch GDP provide the vision and the direction for the planning of the Village 2 SPA Plan. The vision of the GDP for this area is that the Village 2 serves as an `Urban Village. ' According to the GDP/SRP, Urban Villages are "adjacent to existing urban development and are planned for transit oriented development with higher densities and mixed uses in the village cores. Key goals and objectives within the Otay Ranch GDP include: Goal: Develop comprehensive, well-integrated and balanced ]and uses, which aze compatible with the surroundings. (Page 64) Objective: Provide awell-integrated land use pattern, which promotes both housing and employment opportunities, while enhancing the unique environmental and visual qualities of the Otay Ranch. Objective: Provide a wide range of residential housing opportunities, from rural and estate homes to high-density multi-family projects. Provide a balanced and diverse residential land use pattern for the Otay Valley Parcel, which promotes a blend of multi-family and single-family housing styles and densities, integrated and compatible with other land uses in the azea. Objective: Provide development patterns complementary to the adopted plans and existing development of the adjacent communities. The SPA Land Use Plan supports these GDP goals and objectives by providing a range of housing and employment opportunities. The plan adheres to the GDP specific directives for Village 2 that create a village core (composed of commercial, community purpose, elementary school, high school, neighborhood park, town square, and residential land uses) and residential neighborhoods that offer a variety of housing styles and densities. The proposed small lot, single-family, detached product increases the range of housing opportunities by providing a housing type that is not currently available within the Village 2 SPA, and it is consistent with the GDP Objectives listed above. These four- and six-unit small lot products, which are clustered around central auto/activity courts, compliment the existing, alley loaded, small lot, single-family products within the Village 2 north area, and integrate the land use pattern further discussed below. 2. Otav Ranch Village 2 SPA Plan Amendment The proposed reallocation of 113 units/lots from the west and southerly portions to the central northerly portion of Village 2 SPA changes the development pattern from traditional linear single family lotting to a more compact four and six-unit auto activity court pattern. This compact design and increase in density results in a slightly higher GDP land use designation and necessitates the evaluation of urban design criteria, 14-6 January 24, 2012 Item 1 ~ Page 7 of 20 circulation, public facilities, Water Conservation Plan, Air Quality Improvement Plan and other components of the SPA Plan to ensure that these 113 units/lots are integrated into the existing surrounding residential, mixed-use and public-quasi public uses. This evaluation is further described below. Land Use: The proposed organization of land uses within the Village 2 SPA Plan azea meets the objectives of integration and compatibility of land uses within villages and with adjacent communities. Adjacent land uses include existing residential to the north and west, planned residential to the east, Otay Landfill to the west and open space preserve to the south. The land uses within Village 2 transition from the village core mixed use and higher density residential uses to lower density residential uses along the village perimeters and adjacent to the open space preserve areas (see Exhibit 9 of SPA -Sectional Planning Area Tab, Attachment 6). The proposed unit transfers would not result in any significant land use, planning, or zoning impacts, as the proposed modification wou]d be consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan and the Otay Ranch GDP. The SPA Plan would be amended to maintain consistency with the new density configuration within the northerly portion of the Village. Though the transfer would increase the density of the "receiver sites," from approximately six to ten dwelling units/acre, such an increase furthers the policy objective for "Urban Villages" to have "higher densities and mixed uses in the village cores." As no overall net increase in dwelling units would occur, and given that dwelling units would be transferred from one residential zone to another, no additional land use impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the adopted SPA Plan would result. The proposed unit transfer would support Smart Growth Principles, as it provides compact development oriented to pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit, and would further minimize urban sprawl development pattern. The proposed changes would also provide more land use diversity, as compact development and pedestrian orientation make commercial uses more viable. The proposed unit redistribution requires amendments to the SPA Plan and PC District Regulations. Relevant text; graphics and tables are further described below. Village 2 PC District Regulations Amendments The PC District Regulations function as the zoning regulations for Village 2. The 113- uniUlots redistribution results in smaller lots and introduces a new product type -four and six-unit development clusters oriented around central auto/activity courts (see Exhibits 45a, of SPA -Village Design Plan Tab, Attachment 6). The new product type necessitates land use district (zone) changes from SF (single-family) to RM-1 (multi- family) for neighborhoods R-6, R-8b, and R-9b due to plotted densities above 8 dwelling units per acre for these small lot products. Currently, 8 dwelling units per acre is the density threshold between single family and multi-family land use designations. Due to the proposed smaller lot sizes (3,000 square feet or less) and denser development pattern within the respective neighborhoods, supplemental common usable open space 14-7 January 24, 2012 Item ~ }~ Page 8 of 20 azeas aze warranted to provide passive or active recreation azeas and visual relief within the project. These amenities/spaces range from paseos to pocket pazks and vary depending on the neighborhood's design. These spaces are separate from, and not related to, Private Recreational Facilities (PRF's) that may be provided by the applicant. Revisions to Section 6 Common Usable Open Space enables the Director of Development Services to require provision of these additional common usable open space for single-family, small lot development in multi-family land use districts. In addition to the provision of supplemental common usable open spaces, the amendments provide further clarification of the Private Usable Open Space requirements for small lot, single family developments -including revisions to Section 7. Clarification to Private Usable Open Space requirements for small lot detached homes include: • 750 square feet of Private Usable Open Space. • The greater of 450 square feet or 15% of the lot size must be provided within fenced area with no dimension of less than 10 feet. • Landscaped areas adjacent to driveways that may be considered as part of the 750 squaze feet of private usable open space, if the driveways are amenitized with usage of decorative paving materials. ^ Where the required 750 square feet of private open space cannot be met per the above allowances, the remainder must be provided as Common Usable Open Space with the provisions of section 6 and to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director. The applicant worked closely with staff to ensure the project meets these design requirements. An overlook area and a paseo aze provided within neighborhood R-6, and a community gathering area is provided within neighborhood R-8b as common open space amenities (see Proposed/Bxisting Plans graphic on page 9 of Attachment 6). All attached or detached products within the RM-1 zone require Design Review Board (DRB) approval, with the exception of Alley products, which may be approved by the Zoning Administrator (ZA). The proposed four and six-unit auto/activity court products are single-family detached homes on separate fee simple lots within the RM-1 zone. Because these homes are detached, the setbacks and plotting are established in the SPA Plan Design Plan and on the Final Maps. Minor revisions to the PC District Regulations and Design Plan Procedures are proposed to clarify that small lot single family products within a multifamily zone can be reviewed at the ZA level, and may require DRB review at the discretion of the ZA. (see SPA - PC District Regulations and Design Plan tabs, Attachment 6). Village 2 SPA Plan Design Guidelines The Design Guidelines set forth design parameters that pertain to site planning, landscape architecture, architecture and signage for all developments within Village 2. The Design Guidelines contain illustrations and requirements to implement the design ideas presented therein. The Village 2 predominant design theme is Santa Barbara, Spanish architecture. The Design Guidelines consist of various single and multi-family conceptual lotting and spatial orientation illustrations. The proposed project introduces four-unit and six-unit 14-8 January 24, 2012 Item ~!~ Page 9 of 20 detached single-family homes clustered around a central auto/activity court, which provides lotting types that were not previously available within Village 2. These detached single-family products compliment the existing alley small lot developments within Village 2 north vicinity, as they provide individual private yards, various architectural styles including high-quality craftsmanship and materials. The proposed clustered, single-family detached lotting allows for individual ownership at a price range that is more affordable for a wider market of buyers and provides options for single-family housing types. Village 2 SPA Plan -Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP) Third-party consultants prepazed the amended PFFP as a supplemental document to the original PFFP dated February 28, 2006 for the Otay Ranch Village 2 SPA Plan. The Otay Ranch Village 2 Supplemental PFFP analyzes the proposed 113-uniUlot reallocation and any potential impacts on public facilities and services. It also identifies the facilities, phasing and timing triggers for the provision of facilities and services to serve the project, consistent with the City's Quality of Life Threshold Standards. The PFFP describes in detail the cost, financing mechanism and timing for construction of necessary public facilities. The public facilities needed to serve the project will be guaranteed by placing conditions of approval on the Tentative Map, requiring payment of outstanding fees at the building permit stage, and/or continuing payment of bond payments under the approved Community Facilities Districts to finance or maintain public facilities. The PFFP included an analysis of transportation, drainage, water, sewer, fire, schools, libraries, parks, and fiscal impacts of the project, as described below: Transportation A traffic impact report, dated November 22, 2005, was. prepared by traffic consultant, Linscott, Law and Greenspan (LLG), to analyze transportation/traffic impacts resulting from build-out of the original project (SPA Plan and the composite TM for Village Two and a portion of the park within Village Four as approved May, 2006). The analysis concluded that by including the required mitigation measures specified within Section 5.10 of FEIR 02-02 for the implementation of the original project, impacts to intersections and street segments would be reduced to below a level of significance. In conjunction with the proposed Village 2 Unit Transfer project, aproject-specific analysis was prepared by Fehr and Peers (2011) to evaluate the potential traffic impacts associated with the unit transfers. The traffic analysis for the proposed project analyzed the changes in trip distribution within the project site, traffic volumes, LOS levels, regional systems, cumulative projects and traffic related impacts upon the circulation system and roadways. As indicated in the traffic analysis, the proposed project would not result in an increase or decrease in overall unit count. Furthermore, rezoning the transferred units from single family to multi-family would result in a net decrease of 446 daily trips, since single-family units have a higher trip generation rate than multi-family units. Density in portions of Village Two would increase; however, it would decrease in other portions, thereby resulting only in minimal and insignificant changes to traffic 14-9 January 24, 2012 Item 1t• Page 10 of 20 generation and distribution patterns. Additionally, the existing circulation network includes pedestrian and bicycle circulation networks, which reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMTs) and overall demand for single-occupancy trips throughout the project area. Lastly, the unit transfers would make the overall Village 2 design more supportive of transit by increasing densities in areas in close proximity to transit stops. Therefore, no new significant impacts would occur beyond what is analyzed in the EIR (FEIR 02-02). Circulation Olympic Pakway, a four-lane major arterial road, will serve Village 2. Regional access will be provided primarily by SR-125, approximately one and a half miles to the east. The toll road opened in November 2007. Interstate 805 is located approximately three and one half miles to the west and also provides links to regional transportation facilities. The timing for installation of required public improvements and financing mechanisms are discussed in the Otay Ranch Village 2 ("Original PFFP"), and the Otay Ranch Village 2 ("Supplemental PFFP") (see SPA Plan -PFFP Tab, Attachment 6). Street improvements required to serve the project are identified in the original PFFP, the supplemental PFFP and FEIR 02-02. Based on these documents, the applicant is responsible for fair share construction of the following improvements: ^ Heritage Road: Between Olympic Parkway and Main Street ^ Main Street: Heritage Road to connect existing improvements • Santa Victoria Road: Between Olympic Parkway and Heritage Road • Streets internal to the project Drainage The project area is located in the southwestern portion of the San Diego Basin. The San Diego Basin has been divided into 11 hydrographic units and 54 hydrographic subunits, which are based primarily on surface water drainage basins (RWQCB 1975). The proposed SPA Plan azea is located within the Otay Hydrographic Subunit of the Otay Hydrographic Unit. Surface water in the Otay Hydrographic Subunit downstream from Otay Lakes is ephemeral (temporary) and generally found in man-made ponds. According to the Otay Ranch GDP Program EIR, the RWQCB rates the surface water in the subunit as having beneficial uses for agriculture, non-contact recreational sport, wildlife, raze and endangered species, and potential beneficial uses for industry. The landscape within the vicinity of the project area is predominantly rolling hills with arroyos draining to canyons that flow west and south away from the Otay Reservoir basin. The natural drainage basin for the SPA Plan vicinity is a combination of three subbasins that drain directly into Poggi Canyon to the north, Wolf Canyon to the south of Village Two, and from the Otay Valley Road watershed, which drains into unnamed tributaries of the Otay River. Drainage from the northern portion of the Village Two area 14-10 January 24, 2012 Item Page 11 of 20 of the SPA Plan converges into Poggi Canyon, while the southern portion of the Village Two and the northern portion of Village Four property drain to Wolf Canyon Creek. The Village Three portion of the SPA Plan drains to unnamed tributaries of the Otay River. Ultimately, all discharges drain into the Otay River approximately 765 feet from the southernmost point of the SPA Plan property. The project will be conditioned to provide for the conveyance of storm water flows in accordance with City standards, policies and requirements. The Developer will design, install and maintain on-site erosion protection. All permanent or temporary erosion control will be designed to City standards and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Further, the project shall comply with all federal, state and local storm water runoff and discharge regulations. Project-level water quality technical reports were completed for the proposed project. The water quality technical reports outline three options for achieving the water quality treatment and hydromodification requirements of the City of Chula Vista. These three options are: Option 1 -Water Quality Treatment and Hydromodification will be achieved within Neighborhoods R-6, R-8A, R-8B, and R-9B with pavers in courtyards/driveways underlain with adequate bioretention storage for water quality and hydromodification. Option 2 -Water Quality Treatment and Hydromodification will be achieved by upsizing the approved regional stormfilter to account for re-entitled areas (R-6, R- 8A, R-8B, R- 9B) owned by the project applicant, and by constructing a regional underground detention vault for hydromodification. Option 3 -Water Quality Treatment and Hydromodification will be achieved by upsizing the approved regional Stormfilter to account for all re-entitled areas (R-6, R-7, R-8A, R-8B, R-9A, R-9B) within Village Two, and by constructing a regional underground detention vault for hydromodification. The proposed unit transfers would continue to comply with all applicable rules and regulations, including compliance with NPDES permit requirements for urban runoff and storm water discharge. Best Management Practices (BMPs) for design, treatment and monitoring for storm water quality would be implemented with respect to municipal and construction permits. Compliance with all applicable rules and regulations governing water quality as well as implementation of all mitigation measures outlined in Section 5.9 of the EIR and the measures outlined in the water quality technical reports (Hunsaker and Associates 2011a,b) would ensure no additional impacts to water quality beyond those previously analyzed. Water The Otay Water District (OWD) will provide water service for the Otay Ranch Village 2 Unit Transfer project. OWD has facilities in the vicinity of the project that can provide water service. In conjunction with the proposed Village 2 Unit Transfer project, a project-specific analysis has been conducted to evaluate the project's potential water 14-11 January 24, 2012 Item I Page 12 of 20 impacts. The water analysis for the proposed project analyzes changes in unit demand factor, and total average demand between existing (approved) and proposed conditions. The OWD uses a factor of 500 gpd/unit to project water demands for single-family development with a density between 3.0 and 8.0 DU/AC. For densities greater than 8.0 DU/AC, a factor of 300 gpd/unit is used. Under existing land use conditions, all of the affected neighborhoods are within the 3.0 to 8.0 DU/AC category. The proposed unit transfer will increase the densities of neighborhoods R-6, R-8b, and R-9b to above 8.0 DU/AC. As indicated in the water analysis (Wilson Engineers, 2011), the proposed unit transfer will have the net effect of reducing average project water demands by approximately 38,800 gpd (43.5 AFY). The fire flow is 1,500 gallons per minute (gpm), for a duration of 2 hours, which meets the City's requirements. As a result, the water system recommendations from the May 2006 Subarea Master Plan for Village 2 are unchanged as a result of the unit transfer project. Recycled water infrastructure is identified within the OWD Capital Improvement Program to serve Village 2, including certain infrastructure already in place within Olympic Parkway. Additional recycled water facilities for the Project will be constructed based on the approved Subarea Water Master Plan (SAMP). The total capital cost for recycled water facilities will be determined at the time they system is designed and the SAMP is approved. The District may provide reimbursement for construction and design costs associated with development of these improvements. Sewer The City of Chula Vista uses a factor of 265 gpd/unit to project sewer demands for single-family detached residential units. Although the total projected sewage flows will not change as a result of the proposed unit transfer, the transfer does involve shifting flows from the Wolf Canyon Basin to the Poggi Basin. As presented in the sewer analysis (Wilson Engineering, 2011), the proposed unit transfer will have the net effect of shifting average flows of 21,995 gpd (83 EDUs) from the Wolf Canyon Basin to the Poggi Basin. Onsite Sewer: Within the Poggi Canyon Basin, sewer is conveyed to the Poggi Canyon Interceptor at Heritage Road and Santa Venetia Street. The backbone sewer lines serving these areas have already been installed. Although the proposed unit increase within the Poggi Basin is relatively small, the impacts on the onsite sewer system were analyzed. As shown in the sewer analysis (Wilson Engineering, 2011), all sewer lines will flow at a depth to diameter (d/D) of less than 0.50 or less with the proposed unit transfer. This flow rate of less than 0.50 meets the City's standards as stipulated in the Chula Vista Subdivision Manual. 14-12 January 24, 2012 Item Page 13 of 20 Offsire Sewer/Poggi Canyon Interceptor The available capacity in the Poggi Canyon Interceptor was evaluated with the additional 83 EDUs that are proposed to be transferred from the Wolf Canyon Basin to the Poggi Basin. Data on the Poggi Canyon Interceptor was obtained from the April 2009 Poggi Canyon Basin Gravity Sewer Development Impact Fee Update prepared by PMC (PMC study). Data from this report includes existing permitted EDUs in the basin as well as committed EDUs based on previous project approvals. The sewer analysis summarizes the impact that the proposed unit transfer has on permitted and committed remaining capacity. Only the two reaches already identified for future replacement are shown as being over capacity in the PMC study. The proposed unit transfer does not require additional reaches of the Poggi Canyon Interceptor to be upgraded in the future. Fire Development of the proposed Project is not anticipated to change the need for fire service in the azea. The existing Fire Station No. 7, located at 1640 Santa Venetia within the Village 2, would be the primary station to serve the project. Schools The proposed 113-unit transfer would result in the same number of units as the previously approved Village 2 SPA Plan and composite TM project. At completion, it is anticipated the entire Village 2 project ("original project") was estimated to generate approximately 875 students. The proposed unit transfers, being a net zero increase would not result in generating more students within Village 2. An elementary school has been planned within the Village 2 core to serve the build-out population. The central location would give students living in the project azea the option of walking to school. A school mitigation agreement was established between Chula Vista Elementary School District and Otay Project L.P. in November 2005. Students would be bused to a neazby school should the construction of this school not be completed by the time the Project becomes occupied. Middle school students will be served by existing facilities in Rancho del Rey, approximately two miles north of the SPA Plan azea, and a middle school in Eastlake Woods, until a 7-12 grade school is constructed in Otay Ranch Village Eleven. High school students will be served by Otay Ranch High School, which is located in the northwest corner of Village Two, and Olympian High School, which is located to the east in Village Seven. It is anticipated in FEIR 02-02 that the combination of these two high schools within Otay Ranch will be able to accommodate the high school students generated by the proposed project. 14-13 January 24, 2012 Item 1 !~- Page 14 of 20 Parks The project is served by Heritage Pazk, located approximately 'h mile north of Village 2; the Veterans Community Center park, located approximately 1 '/z miles west of Village 2; and the Chula Vista Community pazk between SR-125 and Eastlake Parkway, south of Otay Lakes Road, approximately 2 miles northeast of the project. In addition, three parks (P-1, P-2, P-3) are planned within Village 2, and an approximate 44-acre community park will be located in the northern portion of Village Four, adjacent to Village Two. Amenities in the park include restroom/maintenance buildings, lighted ball fields, lighted soccer fields/multi-purpose turf play areas, lighted sports courts (basketball and/or tennis with lighting), play area with play equipment, picnic facilities (shelters with BBQs and picnic tables), lighted skate (skateboard and/or roller skate) facility, aquatics facility, recreation center/gymnasium facilities, walkways (with security lighting), pathways, lighted pazking lots, and other park support fixtures and furnishing. When the Village 2 SPA Plan and Tentative Map were approved in May 2006, all park, open space and trail requirements were deemed complete and satisfied. The project proposes no increase in number of units, and therefore no additional parkland is required. As a result of the proposed project transferring 94 units from single family to multi-family land use, the parkland requirement has actually decreased due to the parkland obligation for multi-family being less than single family. Despite this, the previously approved amount of acreage for park, recreation, open space, and trails have remained. Village 2 SPA Plan -Water Conservation Plan The City's Growth Management Ordinance requires the prepazation of a Water Conservation Plan (WCP) for all major projects in accordance with the City's Water Conservation Plan Guidelines. The average daily water demand (ADD) for the Project is 181 gpm (gallons per minute). The amount is a reduction from the original Village 2 project, which had an ADD of 208 gpm. This equates to an estimated reduction of approximately 13%. Numerous features have been included in the proposed project to minimize the use of water during the construction and operation of the project. The water conservation measures incorporated into the project as required by the City's WCP Guidelines include hot water pipe insulation, pressure reducing valves, water- efficient dishwashers, dual flush toilets as well as water-efficient landscaping and the use of evapotranspiration controllers. The Project WCP demonstrates the value of incorporating water conservation measures in buildings and irrigation systems for residential development. The implementation of these measures will contribute to preserving a valuable natural resource. The Project is also subject to the City's Water Conservation Ordinance, which is a condition of approval for the four associated Tentative Maps. 14-14 January 24, 2012 Item I ~ Page 15 of 20 Village 2 SPA Plan -Air Quality Improvement Plan An Air Quality Improvement Plan (AQIP) was prepared for the Village 2 SPA Plan and composite TM project area in accordance with the City's Growth Management Ordinance and the Growth Management Program. AQIPs must be prepazed for all residential projects containing 50 dwelling units or more. Impacts to air quality are addressed in Section 5.11 of the original FEIR. The proposed unit transfers would not result in an increase in overall unit count, and would not substantially change traffic generation or distribution patterns. Therefore, it is not expected that any new significant sources of construction or operational air emissions would occur. Construction-related activities would result in short-term dust and equipment exhaust emissions. However, these construction activities would not result in any substantial change in air emissions from what was assumed in the impact analysis of the EIR, as the same types of activities and similar traffic patterns would be maintained. Short-term fugitive dust and combustion emissions associated with construction equipment aze subject to the mitigation measures outlined in Section 5.11 of the EIR. With implementation of the required dust control measures and exhaust pollution minimization measures, emissions associated with project implementation would continue to remain at a level below significant. Therefore, no new or increased levels of air quality impacts beyond those identified in the EIR would occur with implementation of the proposed unit transfers. Affordable Housing Plan The Chula Vista General Plan Housing Element contains objectives, policies, and action programs to accomplish affordable housing objectives. Key among these is the affordable housing policy which requires that residential development with fifty (50) or more dwelling units provide a minimum of 10% of the total dwelling units for low and moderate income households; one-half of these units (5% of the total project) being designated to low income, and the other half (5%) to moderate income households. Within the Village 2 SPA, a total of 278 affordable units, including 139 low-income units and 139 moderate-income units, are required. Due to the ownership fragmentation within Village 2, a Village-wide Affordable Housing Agreement was prepared and signed by all ownerships, stating that each of the respective ownerships would be responsible for the provision of affordable housing units for their developments. Baldwin & Sons would require the provision of 183 affordable housing units, including 92 for low income. The 113-unit proposed reallocation results in a net zero increase in density. Thus, the requirement for 92 affordable low income units are to be commenced at the 50% building permit issuance for all units owned by Baldwin & Sons shall be enforced in accordance with the July 26, 2011 allocation letter. 14-15 January 24, 2012 Item I Page 16 of 20 3. Tentative Subdivision Map (PCS 11-02,11-03, 11-04, 11-OS) A Tentative Subdivision Map is required for a division of land resulting in four or more lots or condominium units, pursuant w Section 2 of the City of Chula Vista Subdivision Manual. The proposed Tentative Maps has been designed to comply with the lot design criteria of the Subdivision Manual. The proposed Tentative Maps would be consistent with surrounding development and would complement the area with the design for more compact, single-family lot clusters in Village 2 north and traditional, linear lots maintained in Village 2 west and south. Overall, the subdivision design is in conformance with the City's Subdivision Manual, Zoning Ordinance and other associated regulatory documents. The following four new Tentative Maps are associated with the proposed 113-unit transfer and reflect the lot design for a total of 10 neighborhoods (three receiver neighborhoods and seven donor neighborhoods) as a result of the unit transfer. The Tentative Maps also include neighborhoods that are beyond the 10 neighborhoods affected by the GDP and SPA amendments. The analysis presented in the PFFP discussion, which addresses transportation, circulation, drainage, water, sewer, fire, schools, and parks on pages 9-13 of this staff report are also applicable to the four proposed Tentative Maps and, therefore, will not be repeated. As mentioned in the Discussion section on page 3 of this staff report, the acreages associated with the Tentative Maps include neighborhoods that aze beyond the unit transfer associated with the GDP/SPA amendment azea. The Tentative Maps aze listed and described below in chronological order with descriptions particular to that map such as access, subdivision design and grading. 1. PCS 11-02: Proposes to subdivide approximately 48 acres to reduce the number of single-family lots from ninety-eight (98) lots to sixty-eight (68) lots while providing two (2) open space lots, and ten (10) neighborhood open space lots within Neighborhood R-4B. The reduction of 30 units in R-4B will be offset by an equivalent increase in units in Neighborhood R-6. Project Access: Access to the project area is provided from Santa Victoria Road. Barranca Avenue, Occidental Road, Hope Ranch Road, and Brinkerhoff Avenue, provide access within the project area. These streets will conform to the guidelines set forth in the Village 2 SPA Plan and to applicable City of Chula Vista street design guidelines. Subdivision Design: The subdivision design consists of 68 residential lots, two (2) open space lots, and ten (10) neighborhood open space lots. The lots will be single family and range from 8,650 sf to 19,352 sf in size. The homeowners' association, required as part of the Tentative Subdivision Map, will be responsible for the maintenance of the private driveway, landscaping, and on-site facilities. 14-16 January 24, 2012 Item Page 17 of 20 Grading: In conjunction with approval of the original Tentative Map (CVT 06-OS) and in conformance with the City of Chula Vista's General Plan and the Otay Ranch GDP, a grading approach was established for the Village 2 SPA Plan. This approach identifies mesas, hilltops, and gently rolling topography as the best conditions for development, with steeply sloped hills and valleys serving as resources linking regional amenities and natural features. After the original Tentative Map's approval, a grading permit was issued for Village 2 West for clearing and grubbing. The proposed map allows for a grading approach consistent with and substantially similar to that established for the original Tentative Map (CVT 06-OS), and with the previously issued grading. Development within the map area is proposed atop a mesa bounded by steeply sloped hills to the east (to the proposed extension of Heritage Road) and to the north (Olympic Parkway). The proposed development is contained on mesas and gently rolling terrain, while steeply sloped hills aze maintained as a connection to regional amenities and as a buffer between roadways and development. The grading footprint will remain the same as the originally approved plan. Any further grading will conform to the City of Chula Vista grading ordinance. 2. PCS 11-03: Proposes to subdivide approximately 57.9 acres within a larger approximate 166.76 acre azea and amend the number of single-family lots and multi- family lots. The number of single-family lots will be reduced from two hundred sixty-three (263) single family lots to one hundred ninety nine (199) lots and the multi-family units from eighty (80) to sixty-one (61) units. Thirty eight (38) neighborhood open space lots will be provided within the southerly portion of Village 2 Neighborhood(s) R-20, R-23, R-24, R-25A, R-25B, and R-27. The reduction of 83 units will be offset by an equivalent increase in units in northerly Neighborhoods R-6, R-8 and R-9b. Project Access: Vehiculaz access to the site will be provided from Santa Victoria Road, Santa Carolina Road, Santa Christina Avenue, Santa Ivy Avenue, Santa Liza Street, and numerous other streets internal to the project. An extensive circulation system with well-connected streets in a grid pattern will allow for multiple points of ingress and egress for both automobiles and pedestrians. These streets will conform to the guidelines set forth in the Village 2 SPA Plan and to applicable City of Chula Vista street design guidelines. Street improvements within the right-of--way will include a 5-foot wide sidewalk and curb and gutter to match the adjacent public improvements. Subdivision Design: The subdivision design consists of four hundred thirty-three (433) single family residential lots, three (3) multi-family lots, seventy-nine (79) neighborhood open space lots, one (1) CPF lot, rivo (2) industrial lots, and six (6) master HOA lots. Single-family lots will range from 2,890 sf to 19,244 sf. The homeowners' association, required as part of the Tentative Subdivision Map, will be responsible for the maintenance of the private driveway, landscaping, and on-site facilities. 14-17 January 24, 2012 Item 1~ Page 18 of 20 Grading: The proposed map allows for a grading approach consistent with that established for the original Tentative Map (CVT 06-OS). Although grading plans have yet to be finalized for Village 2 south, the proposed plan locates development on gently rolling terrain, while maintaining steep slopes to the south towazd Wolf Canyon. Neighborhood orientation and street alignments aze intended to minimize the necessity for grading and retaining walls. This allows for the implementation of a grading approach substantially similar to that which was intended for the original Tentative Map. Any grading will conform to the City of Chula Vista grading ordinance. 3. PCS 11-04: Proposes to subdivide approximately 25.5 acres into one hundred twenty-six (126) single-family lots, one (1) open space lot, and one (1) neighborhood open space lot. The subdivision would be in conjunction with the reallocation of 63 residential lots within Village 2 Neighborhood R-6, increasing the residential unit count from 63 to 126 single family lots. Project Access: Vehicular access to the site is provided from Santa Christina Avenue, Pershing Road, and Mason Road. These streets will conform to the guidelines set forth in the Village 2 SPA Plan and to applicable City of Chula Vista street design guidelines. Street improvements within the right-of--way will include a 5-foot wide sidewalk and curb and gutter to match the adjacent public improvements. Subdivision Design: The subdivision design consists of one hundred twenty-six (126) single-family residential lots, one (1) open space lot, and one (1) neighborhood open space lot served by internal public and private roadways with access from Santa Christina Avenue, Pershing Road, and Mason Road. Single-family lots will range from 2,705 sf to 5,310 s£ The homeowners' association, required as part of the Tentative Subdivision Map, will be responsible for the maintenance of the private driveway, landscaping, and on-site facilities. Grading: The Village 2 SPA Plan identify mesas, hilltops, and gently rolling topography as the best conditions for development, while steeply sloped hills and valleys can serve as resources linking regional and natural features. Additionally, the Otay Ranch GDP seeks to concentrate urban development on the flatter areas and retain sensitive natural topographic features. Implementation of the proposed map conforms to and enhances these goals by further concentrating urban development on mesa tops and gently rolling terrain, while retaining sensitive natural topographic features. The proposed plan allows for substantial conformance to the grading plan for Village 2 north, which was approved in conjunction with the original Village 2 Tentative Map (CVT 06-OS). The site is currently in a graded pad condition and slopes gently northwest toward Olympic 14-18 January 24, 2012 Item I ~ Page I9 of 20 Parkway. Minor changes to the existing grading plan include adding a small amount of fill to increase pad height for a neighborhood overlook area in the northwest portion of the map and minor adjustments in street height (Franceschi Drive), alignments to minimize the need for retaining walls or further on-site grading. The grading footprint will remain the same as the originally approved plan. Grading will conform to the City of Chula Vista grading ordinance. 4. PCS 11-05: Proposes to subdivide approximately 44.2 acres into 180 single-family residential lots, four multi-family residential lots, and 15 neighborhood open space lots in the north central portion of Otay Ranch Village 2. The subdivision would be in conjunction with GDP and SPA amendments reallocating of 50 residential units within Village 2 by amending Neighborhoods R-8 and R-9b residential unit count from 95 to 145. Project Access: Vehiculaz access to the site is provided from Santa Christina Avenue, Pershing Road, and Mason Road. These streets will conform to the. guidelines set forth in the Village 2 SPA Plan and to applicable City of Chula Vista street design guidelines. Street improvements within the right-of--way will include a 5-foot wide sidewalk and curb and gutter to match the adjacent public improvements. Subdivision Design: The subdivision design consists of 180 single-family residential lots, four multi- family residential lots, and 15 neighborhood open space lots served by public and private internal roadways with access from Santa Diana Road, Santa Ivy Avenue, and Santa Alexia Avenue. Single-family lots will range from 2,888 sf to 8,397 sf in size. The homeowners' association, required as part of the Tentative Subdivision Map, will. be responsible for the maintenance of the private driveway, landscaping, and on-site facilities. Grading: The Village 2 SPA Plan identify mesas, hilltops, and gently rolling topography as the best conditions for development, while steeply sloped hills and valleys can serve as resources linking regions and natural features. Additionally, the Otay Ranch GDP seeks to concentrate urban development on the flatter areas and retain sensitive natural topographic features. Implementation of the proposed map conforms to and enhances these goals by further concentrating urban development on mesa tops and gently rolling terrain, while retaining sensitive natural topographic features. The proposed plan substantially conforms to the grading plan for Village 2 north, which was approved in conjunction with the original Village 2 Tentative Map (CVT 06-OS). The site is currently in a graded pad condition and gently slopes northwest towazd Olympic Pazkway. In conformance with SPA guidelines, steep hillside slopes are maintained at the perimeter of the pad to the north and east. The proposed plan will allow for implementation of the grading plan for Village 2 north, which was approved in conjunction with the original Village 2 Tentative Map (CVT 06-OS). Minor changes 14-19 January 24, 2012 Item ~_l..j_ Page 20 of 20 to the existing grading plan include adjustments to .street alignments. The grading footprint will remain the same as the originally approved plan. Grading will conform to the City of Chula Vista grading ordinance. CONCLUSION For the reasons mentioned above, staff recommends approval of the attached Resolution and Ordinance for PCM 11-05/06, and Resolution(s) for PCS 11-02, 11-03, 11-04, and 11-OS project subject to the conditions listed in the attached City Council Resolutions and Ordinance. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICTS Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council members and has found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundazies of the property that is subject to this action. FISCAL IMPACT Current Year: The processing costs for the GDP and SPA Plan amendments, Tentative Maps and all supporting documents were funded by a developer deposit account. Ongoing Fiscal Impact The proposed project results in a net zero increase in units; thus, the applicant was not required to conduct a separate Fiscal Impact Analysis (FIA). The FIA for the Village 2 SPA Plan is still in effect for the proposed project. The Village 2 FIA estimated that at buildout, the fiscal impact to the City would be approximately $355,000 net positive. Attachments: 1. Locator Map 2. Planning Commission Resolution 3. Addendum to FEIR 02-02 4. Disclosure Statement 5. Tentative Maps (PCS 11-02; PCS 11-03; PCS 11-04; PCS 11-OS) 6. Village 2 GDP/SPA Plan Amendments booklet Prepared by: Stan Donn, Senior Planner, Development Services Department J:\Planning\StanDWdvance Planning Division\Otay Ranch Village 2\Baldwin & Sons\Repons & Resos\CC\Final\CC Agenda Statement 1-24-20I2Final.doc 14-20 ATTACHMENT 1 Locator Map 14-21 14-22 ATTACHMENT 2 Planning Commission Resolution 14-23 RESOLUTION NO. PCM-11-05/06, PCS-11-02, 11-03, 11-04, 11-OS RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL: 1) CONSIDER THE ADDENDUM (IS-11-001) TO FEIR 02-02; 2) APPROVE AMENDMENTS TO THE OTAY RANCH GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN (GDP), OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 2 SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN, OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 2 PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS, AND LAND USE DISTRICTS MAP AND ASSOCIATED REGULATORY DOCUMENTS; AND 3) APPROVE FOUR TENTATIVE MAPS TO TRANSFER 113 UNITS AMONG TEN NEIGHBORHOODS LOCATED SOUTH OF OLYMPIC PARKWAY AND WEST OF LA MEDIA ROAD. WHEREAS, on April 5, 2011, a duly verified application was filed with the City of Chula Vista Development Services Department by Baldwin and Sons, LLC ("Applicant, Owner, and Developer") requesting approval of amendments to the Otay Ranch GDP (PCM 11-OS), Otay Ranch Village 2 SPA Plan, Planned Community District Regulations and associated regulatory documents (PCM 11-06), and four new Tentative Maps involving approximately 111.6 acres of the 312 acres Village 2 located south of Olympic Parkway and west of La Media Road ("Project") and more specifically described below; and WHEREAS, an application for a Tentative Subdivision Map (PCS 11-02) requests approval to amend the number of single-family lots from ninety-eight (98) lots to sixty-eight (68) lots while providing two (2) open space lots and ten (10) neighborhood open space lots on a 48 acre site within Otay Ranch Village 2 Neighborhood R-4B; and WHEREAS, an application for a Tentative Subdivision Map (PCS 11-03) requests approval to amend the number of single-family lots from two hundred sixty three (263) single-family lots to one hundred ninety nine (199) lots and multi-family units from eighty (80) to sixty one (61) units. The map would also provide thirty eight (38) neighborhood open space lots on a 57.9 acre site within Otay Ranch Village 2 Neighborhood R-20, R-23, R-24, R-25A, R-25B, R-27; and WHEREAS, an application fora Tentative Subdivision Map (PCS 11-04) requests approval to amend the number of single-family lots from sixty-three (63) to one hundred twenty six (126) single-family lots and provide one (1) neighborhood open space lot on a 25 acre site; and WHEREAS, an application for a Tentative Subdivision Map (PCS 11-OS) requests to amend the number of residential units in R-8 and R-9b from a cumulative total of ninety-five (95) to one hundred forty five (145), an increase of 50 residential units (27 to R-8 and 23 to R-9b). Though the whole PCS 11-OS will increase from 130 to 180, 14-24 Planning Commission Resolution PCM 11-05/06, PCS 11-02, 11-03, 11-04, 11-OS Page 2 only R-8 and R-9b aze being affected. The map will also provide 15 neighborhood open space lots in the north/central portion of Otay Ranch Village 2; and WHEREAS, the area of land that is the subject of this Resolution is an existing pazcel located in the western portion of Otay Ranch Village 2 Neighborhood 4B, R-6, R- 8, R-9b, R-20, R-23, R-24, R-25A, R-25B, R-27 ("Project Site"); and WHEREAS, the Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project was covered in previously adopted Final Second Tier Environmental Impact Report, Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, FEIR 02-02. The Development Services Director has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the Development Service Director has prepared an addendum to this document, Final Second Tier Environmental Impact Report, Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, FEIR 02-02; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the Addendum (IS 11-001) to FEIR 02-02 has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of CEQA and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista; and WHEREAS, the Development Services Director set the time and place for a hearing on the Project, and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property, at least 10 days prior to the hearing; and, WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 6:00 p.m, January 11, 2012, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission and the hearing was thereafter closed. NOW THEREFORE, THE CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION MAKES THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: L SPA FINDINGS THE SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN, AS AMENDED, IS IN CONFORMITY WITH THE OTAY RANCH VILLAGE II GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN AND ITS SEVERAL ELEMENTS. The proposed amendments to the Otay Ranch Village 2 SPA Plan reflect land uses that are consistent with the Otay Ranch Village 2 General Development Plan and the City of Chula Vista General Plan. The residential nature of the 14-25 Planning Commission Resolution PCM 11-05/06, PCS 11-02, 11-03, 11-04, 11-OS Page 3 proposed unit transfers would be consistent with the adopted medium-density residential designation for the project site and compatible with the surrounding residential densities of up to 15 du/ac, and open space land uses of the Otay Ranch area. The transfer of 113 residential units from the westerly and southerly portion to the northerly portion involving 111.6 acres would occur internally within the boundaries of the 312-acre project azea. The transferred units would be located in closer proximity to the village core that provides for commercial and public/quasi-public uses adjacent to transit, furthering the policy of the Otay Ranch GDP that "Urban Villages" have "higher densities and mixed uses in the Village Core". THE SPA PLAN, AS AMENDED, WILL PROMOTE THE ORDERLY SEQUENTIALIZED DEVELOPMENT OF THE INVOLVED SECTIONAL PLANNING AREAS. The requested amendments to the Otay Ranch Village 2 SPA Plan rely on a combination of the previously prepazed and approved PFFP and the newly prepared supplemental PFFP to outline infrastmcture required to serve the entire, previously approved 2,786 unit project, along with the timing of installation and the financing mechanisms to promote the sequentialized development of the project. The requested transfer of 113 units will not affect the timeframes outlined in the previous PFFP. Development of the 113 units will occur in an orderly, sequentialized manner as outlined in the PFFP, as part of the overall development of Otay Ranch Village 2. THE OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 2 SPA PLAN, AS AMENDED, WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT ADJACENT LAND USES, RESIDENTIAL ENJOYMENT, CIRCULATION OR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. The proposed modifications to land use and development standard provisions within the Project Site have been fully analyzed and will not adversely affect the circulation system and overall land use as previously envisioned in the Otay Ranch General Development Plan and Village 2 SPA Plan. The transfer of 113 units involving 111.6 acres would occur internally within the boundaries of the 312-acre project site. The existing infrastructure (sewer, water, public services and facilities) has been determined to be adequate to serve the proposed 113-unit transfer, as described in the supplemental PFFP. Additionally, a Water Quality Technical Report has been prepared, reviewed and approved by the City Engineer, ensuring that the proposed project meets the required water quality standards that are in effect. An Addendum to FEIR- 02-02 has been prepared and the Development Services Director has determined that any impacts associated with the proposed amendments have been previously addressed in FEIR-02-02; and thus, the requested amendments to the SPA will not adversely affect the adjacent land uses, residential enjoyment, circulation or environmental quality of the surrounding uses. 14-26 Planning Commission Resolution PCM 11-05/06, PCS 1 I-02, 11-03, 11-04, 1 ]-OS Page 4 II. TENTATIVE MAP FINDINGS Pursuant to Government Code Section 66473.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, the City Council finds that the Tentative Subdivision Map, as conditioned herein, is in conformance with the elements of the City's General Plan, based on the following: 1. Land Use and Transportation PCS-11-02: The General Plan land use designation is Low Medium Density Residential (3-6 DU/AC). The proposed implementing zone is SF2 Single- Family Residential, which will be amended through the proposed SPA Plan Amendment (PCM-11-06). The proposed changes result in decreased densityfrom 4.0 DU/AC to 2.7 DU/AC. SF lots will range from 8,650 sf to 19,352 sf in size. PCS-11-03: The General Plan land use designation for the project area is Low Medium Density Residential (3-6 DU/AC). The implementing zones are SF3 and SF4 Residential, which allow minimum lot area of 4,000 square feet and 3,000 square feet, respectively, and average lot area of 5,000 and 3,800 squaze feet, respectively. The proposed R-20, R-23, R-24, R-25a, R-25b, and R-27 neighborhoods will be developed with residential lots at a density of 3.9 DU/AC, with lots at minimum and average sizes which aze within the allowable density, lot size, and permitted number of dwelling units. PCS-11-04: The General Plan land use designation is Low Medium (LM) Density Residential (3-6 DU/AC). The implementing zone is RMl. The lot size is governed through the Design Review process. The proposed subdivision will be developed with residential lots at a density of 10 DU/AC, with an average size of 3,081 squaze feet and a minimum of 2,705 square feet. In combination with other developments in the surrounding LM land use designation azea is within the allowable density, lot size, and permitted number of dwelling units. PCS-11-O5: The General Plan Designation for R-8a, R-8b, and R-9b is Low Medium Density Village (3-6 DU/AC). The implementing zone is RM1. Lot size for these neighborhoods is governed through the Design Review Process. The implementing zone for R8a is SF3, which allows minimum lot area of 4,000 square feet and average lot area of 5,000 square feet. The proposed R- 8a, R-8b, and R-9b, will be developed in combination with other surrounding developments in the LM land use designation and aze, in combination, within the allowable density and permitted number of dwelling units. All off-site public streets required to serve the subdivision already exist or will be constructed or paid for by the Applicant in accordance with the Conditions of Approval. The on-site public street is designed in accordance with the City 14-27 Planning Commission Resolution PCM 11-05/06, PCS 11-02, 11-03, 11-04, 11-OS Page 5 design standards and/or requirements and provides for vehicular and pedestrian connections. 2. Economic Development The Project results in a net zero increase in units within Village 2, while providing asingle-family small lot product that was not previously available, in a more compact format within walking distance to the village core. The four and six-unit compact products support economic policies regarding the pursuit and provision of diverse housing types and costs in order to provide balance for housing opportunities as well as jobs. These compact clustered single-family products provide a wider range of housing options and pricing for potential home-buyers in the current housing market. By reallocating 113 units and increasing densities close to the village core, increased patronage to the nearby commercial and public/quasi-public uses, can be anticipate to contribute to greater economic development within Village 2 and the City. The Project allows the development of detached small lot single-family homes on separate, fee-simple lots. This housing typology is reflective of greater demand for these products in today's economic environment. The four and six-unit cluster design, around a central auto/activity court provides a housing type that is new to Village 2, and specifically designed to align with today's marketplace and economic conditions. The Project provides homebuyers the opportunity to purchase detached, single-family homes with greater affordability, reduced maintenance/utility costs, and less dependency on the automobile. As a new housing typology within Otay Ranch, the proposed homes also provide further variation in housing opportunities available to Chula Vista residents, consistent with Objective ED 2. The proposed project also fosters economic development benefit at the community level by providing for increased housing densities within the same footprint. These increased densities allow for infrastructure and municipal services to be provided at reduced cost per capita (more people served by the same municipal services). Additionally, with increased housing (and population) within the same footprint, increased densities improve the viability of community serving commercial and public/quasi public uses as well as alternative transportation modes. As a result, the proposed project may serve as a catalyst for small and mid-sized industries and businesses and community serving and neighborhood uses, consistent with Objective ED 3 and ED 9. 3. Public Facilities and Services/Draina¢e and Water Quality The Project has been conditioned to ensure that all necessary public facilities and services will be available to serve the Project contemporaneous with the demand for those services. A Public Facilities Financing Plan has been prepared to supplement that which is already in place to define public service, facility, and phasing needs created by the Project. 14-28 Planning Commission Resolution PCM 11-05/06, PCS 11-02, 11-03, 11-04, 11-OS Page 6 Project-level water quality technical reports were completed for the proposed project. The water quality technical reports outline three options for achieving the water quality treatment and hydromodification requirements of the City of Chula Vista. One of the three options would be implemented and approved by the City Engineer. The proposed unit transfers would continue to comply with all applicable rules and regulations including compliance with NPDES permit requirements for urban runoff and storm water discharge. Best Management Practices (BMPs) for design, treatment and monitoring for storm water quality would be implemented as delineated in the EIR with respect to municipal and construction permits. Compliance with all applicable rules and regulations governing water quality as well as implementation of all mitigation measures outlined in Section 5.9 of the EIR and the measures outlined in the water quality technical reports (Hunsaker and Associates 2011a,b) would ensure no additional impacts to water quality beyond those previously analyzed. Project-specific analyses have been conducted relative to the project's potential sewer and water impacts. The proposed project would reduce average projected water demands by 38,800 gallons per day (gpd). This reduction is due to an increase in density (greater than 8 units per acre), resulting in a reduced water demand per unit. As such, the water system recommendations from the May 2006 Subarea Master Plan for Village 2 remain unchanged as a result of this project. Additionally, while the total projected sewage flows will not change as a result of the proposed project, the project does involve shifting 83 units from the Wolf Canyon Basin to the Poggi Basin, which results in a shift of 21,995 gpd from the Wolf Canyon Basin to the Poggi Basin. The proposed project, however, would not require additional reaches of the Poggi Canyon Interceptor to be upgraded in the future. Upon approval of the proposed project, the Development Impact Fee for the Poggi Basin would be updated to reflect the additional units. 4. Environmental Element The project has been reviewed in accordance with the requirements of CEQA. An Addendum has been prepared for the project in order to address the proposed modifications to the lot configurations within Village Two from the adopted Final Second Tier Environmental Impact Report, Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, FEIR 02-02. The proposed modifications would not result in an increase in overall unit count, and would not substantially change traffic generation or distribution patterns. No additional significant impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the EIR, or substantial increases in any identified significant impacts are anticipated; however, the proposed modification represents new information that was not available at the time that the EIR was certified. Therefore, the Addendum and the Mitigation Monitoring Program 14-29 Planning Commission Resolution PCM 11-0/06, PCS 11-02, 11-03, 11-04, 11-OS Page 7 ensures that all environmental impacts will be mitigated to a level less than significant. 5. Growth Mana eg merit The project would result in a no net change in number of dwelling units. Therefore, the surrounding street segments and intersections as planned or built, including Olympic Parkway and Santa Victoria Road, will continue to operate/serve at the same Level of Service in compliance with the City's traffic threshold standard with the proposed project traffic. No adverse impact to the City's traffic threshold standards would occur as a result of the proposed project. The Project site is located in the attendance area of Hedenkamp Elementary School, within the boundazies of the Chula Vista Elementary School District. The Project is also within the attendance area of Otay Ranch High School and Olympian High School, within the Sweetwater Union High School District. The Applicant will be required to pay applicable developer fees based upon assessable area. 6. Open Svace and Conservation The project proposes single-family homes that meet the minimum open space requirement per the Otay Ranch Village 2 SPA. The project would also be required to provide parkland or pay park fees towards the acquisition and development of future parks. The proposed landform grading conforms to the City's grading Ordinance and retains regional and natural open space features. The development of the site is consistent with the goals and policies of the Conservation Element. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Draft City Council Resolutions and Ordinance approving the Project in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA THAT a copy of this Resolution and the draft City Council Resolutions and Ordinance be transmitted to the City Council. 14-30 Planning Commission Resolution PCM 11-05/06, PCS 11-02, 11-03, 11-04, 11-OS Page 8 PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 11~' day of January, 2012, by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN Michael Spethman, Chairperson ATTEST: Diana Vargas, Secretary 14-31 ATTACHMENT 3 Addendum to FEIR 02-02 14-32 Addendum to EIR Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four Spa Plan FINAL PROJECT NAME: Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan -Unit Transfers PROJECT LOCATION: PROJECT APPLICANT: DATE: 1.0 INTRODUCTION City of Chula Vista City of Chula Vista January 18, 2012 The Final Second Tier Environmental Impact Report, Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan (EIR) contains a comprehensive disclosure and analysis of potential environmental effects associated with the implementation of the SPA Plan in the City of Chula Vista (City of Chula Vista 2006). The Plan was developed to refine and implement the land use plans, goals and objectives of the Otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP) for the development of Villages Two, Three, and a portion of Village Four. The original proposed SPA Plan is comprised of the following land use components: 2,786 dwelling units (986 single-family and 1,800 multi-family units) on approximately 335.1 acres and three industrial areas on 87.9 acres within Village Two and a 176.5-acre business park within Village Three. Village Four contains a 44.2-acre community park site. The remaining acres would be developed with non-residential uses, including community purpose facilities (CPFs), schools, public parks, commercial uses, open space, two pedestrian bridges, and circulation right-of--way. This Addendum addresses proposed modifications to the lot configurations within Village Two, consisting of the transfer of 86 units from R-4B, R-20, R-23, R-24, R-25A, R-25B, and R-27 to R-6, R-8, and R-9B. These unit transfers would require an amendment to the SPA Plan. The proposed modifications would not result in an increase in overall unit count, and would not substantially change traffic generation or distribution patterns. No additional significant impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the EIR, or substantial increases in any identified significant impacts are anticipated; however, the proposed modification represents new information that was 14-33 Addendum to EIR Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four Spa Plan FINAL not available at the time that the EIR was certified. Therefore, the City has prepared this addendum pursuant to CEQA to disclose minor changes in the project, and minor changes in some of the environmental effects as a result of proposed project modifications. 2.0 CEQA REQUIREMENTS Sections 15162 through 15164 of the CEQA guidelines discuss a lead agency's responsibilities in handling new information that was not included in a project's final environmental impact report (EIR). Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines provides: (a) When an EIR has been certified...for a project, no subsequent EIIt shall be prepared for that project unless the City determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: 1. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the EIIt...due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; 2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or 3. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the EIR was certified as complete, shows any of the following: (A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the [Final] EIR; (B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the [Final] EIR; 14-34 Addendum to EIR Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four Spa Plan FINAL (C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the [Final] EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. In the event that one of these conditions would require prepazation of a subsequent EIR, but "only minor additions or changes would be necessary to make the [Final] EIR adequately apply to the project in the changed situation," the City could choose instead to issue a supplement to the Final EIR (CEQA Guidelines, § 15163, subd. (a)). In the alternative, where the changes or new information will result in no new impacts, or no more severe impacts, than any that were disclosed in the Final EIR for the Project, it is appropriate for the City to prepare an addendum pursuant to CEQA Guideline, § 15164. That section states that an addendum should include a "brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a-subsequent EIR pursuant to § 15162," and that the explanation needs to be supported by substantial evidence (CEQA Guidelines, § 15164, subd. (e).) The addendum need not be circulated for public review, but may simply be attached to the Final EIR (Ibid.; CEQA Guideline, § 15164, subd. (c)). Thus, in the following inquiry the City considers under the standards articulated above whether each of these changed circumstances reveal or create previously-undisclosed significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously disclosed impacts (CEQA Guidelines, §§15162, 15163, 15164, subd. (a); 15088.5, subds. [a], [b]). As the discussion demonstrates, it is appropriate for the City to prepare this Addendum to the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan project, pursuant to CEQA Guideline, § 15164. 14-35 Addendum to EIR Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four Spa Plan FINAL 3.0 PROJECT LOCATION AND REGIONAL SETTING Otay Ranch lies within the East Planning Area of the City of Chula Vista. The East Planning Area is bordered by Interstate 805 (I-805) to the west, San Miguel Mountain and State Route 54 to the north, the Otay Reservoir and the Jamul foothills to the east, and the Otay River valley to the south. The SPA Plan area is located roughly in the center of the East Planning Area (Figure 1). The SPA Plan azea is located at the western edge of the Otay Valley Parcel of the Otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP) area. The SPA Plan azea is bordered by Olympic Parkway to the north and La Media Road to the east (Figure 2). Village Two occupies the northern portion of the area located east of Heritage Road. A portion of Village Two, "Village Two West," is located to the west of Heritage Road. The SPA Plan area is topographically diverse with elevations ranging from 240 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) in the southern portions to 535 feet AMSL in the northeastern portion. The proposed project area consists of rolling hills in its central portion and relatively steep tributary canyons in its northern and southern portions. Numerous drainages trend north to south into Wolf Canyon, and one east/west-trending drainage occurs in the northeastern portion of the site. The predominate land uses onsite include cattle grazing and vacant land, and a number of dirt roads traverse the project site. The proposed project area is surrounded by other Otay Ranch development areas including Villages One and Five located to the north of Olympic Parkway and Villages Six and Seven located to the east of La Media Road. The Otay Landfill is located south of Village Two West and west of Heritage Road. 4.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed action described in this Addendum consists solely of the transfer of 86 units within the Otay Ranch Village Two planning area. Specifically, 86 units would be removed from R-4B (-30 units), R-20 (-8 units), R-23 (-23 units), R-24 (-13 units), R-25A (-10 units), R-25B (-10 units), and R-27 (-19 units) to R-6 (+63 units), R-8 (+27 units), and R-9B (+23 units) in order to respond to current market demands (Figure 3). The proposed action would increase density within the R-6, R-8 and R-9B zones, changing the character of these zones from that of a conventional single family residential development to a more dense, clustered type of single 14-36 Addendum to EIR Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four Spa Plan FINAL family residential product. To achieve the project objectives, the proposed modifications would require minor amendments to the Otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP), the Otay Ranch SPA Plan for Villages 2, 3 and a portion of 4 and the approved Tentative Map for Village 2 approved as TM PCS 06-OS on May 23, 2006 and as amended by approved Substantial Conformance Requests on February 15, 2007 and December 13, 2007. The proposed modification would not result in an increase in overall unit count, and would noC substantially change traffic generation or distribution patterns. Additionally, all transferred housing units would be located within the same building footprints as proposed in the original EIR project description. 5.0 IDENTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS The following environmental analysis provided in Section 6.0 supports a determination that approval and implementation of density modifications to Otay Ranch Village Two would not result in any additional significant environmental effects beyond those previously analyzed under the Final Second Tier EIR for the project. 6.0 ANALYSIS Aesthetics/Landform Alterations Impacts to aesthetics are addressed in Section 5.2 of the EIR. As analyzed in the EIR, the SPA Plan would not obstruct a scenic vista and no scenic resources are visible from nearby roadways, including Olympic Parkway. The SPA Plan includes design development standards for residential districts and requires implementation of its landscaping concept within the village. A landscaped parkway would be located along the Village Two border with Olympic Parkway to minimize impacts to visual quality. The unit transfers within Village Two would shift density from one area of the SPA Plan to another; however, the aesthetic nature of the residential development within these areas would not be substantially different. Therefore, the proposed unit transfers would not result in any significant impacts to scenic vistas or resources. The design of the SPA Plan is based on the unique characteristics of the landform and surrounding development and includes design guidelines using design features and development requirements for the SPA Plan area. These guidelines include architectural design standards for new residences, and preservation of ridgelines and steep hillside slopes with native habitats. 14-37 Addendum to EIR Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four Spa Plan FINAL Architectural styles would be compatible with each other and surrounding development and easily integrated into the -style and scale of the neighborhood. The proposed action would increase density within the R-6 and R-9B zones, changing the character of these zones from that of a conventional single family residential development to a more dense, clustered type of single family residential product. Although the proposed unit transfers would result in higher residential densities in portions of Village Two, thereby altering previously discussed development patterns, the modification would maintain all previously analyzed design standards and azchitectural considerations. Therefore, density increases in Village Two would not result in new substantial or significant impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the EIR. Agriculture Impacts to agriculture are addressed in Section 5.7 of the EIR. The proposed unit transfers would not result in development outside of previously established footprints for project development as proposed in the SPA Plan. Therefore, no new or increased levels of impacts to agricultural resources would result from implementation of the proposed unit transfers beyond those previously analyzed in the EIR. Additionally, an Agricultural Plan has been prepared as part of the SPA Plan in accordance with the mitigation identified in the Otay Ranch GDP Program EIR. This plan is intended to allow for interim agricultural activity and to prevent the potential for land use impacts between developed land and ongoing agricultural activities by providing separation between urban and adjacent agricultural uses. The Agricultural Plan includes a requirement for notification of adjacent property owners of pesticide use and other potentially harmful activities, as well as physical barriers, if warranted. Consequently, no new impacts to agriculture beyond those previously analyzed would occur. Air Quality Impacts to air quality are addressed in Section 5.11 of the EIlZ. The proposed unit transfers addressed in this Addendum would not result in an increase in overall unit count, and would not substantially change trafftc generation or distribution patterns. Therefore, it is not expected that any new significant sources of construction or operational air emissions would occur. Construction-related activities would result in short-term dust and equipment exhaust emissions. However, these construction activities would not result in any substantial change in air emissions from what was assumed in the impact analysis of the EIR, as the same types of activities and similar traffic patterns would be maintained. Short term fugitive dust and combustion emissions associated with construction equipment are subject to the mitigation measures outlined in Section 5.11 of the EIR. With implementation of the required dust control measures and exhaust 14-38 Addendum to EIR Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four Spa Plan FINAL pollution minimization measures, emissions associated with project implementation would continue to remain at a level below significant. Therefore, no new or increased levels of air quality impacts beyond those identified in the EIR would occur with implementation of the proposed unit transfers. Biological Resources Impacts to biological resources are addressed in Section 5.3 of the EIR. As indicated in the EIR, sensitive species, habitats, and vegetation communities, as well as jurisdictional waters exist within the proposed SPA Plan area. However, the proposed unit transfers would not exceed previously-established footprints for project development as proposed in the SPA Plan and new modifications would be subject to mitigation as provided in Section 5.3. Therefore, no new or increased levels of impacts to biological resources would result from implementation of the proposed unit transfers beyond those previously analyzed. Cultural Resources Impacts to cultural resources are addressed in Section 5.4 of the EIR. As identified in the EIR, there were 76 prehistoric sites identified within the SPA Plan area. Following site testing, only one site was determined to be a significant historic resource. The remaining 15 sites were determined not to be significant historic resources, however gading and excavation activities associated with the proposed project could impact known and unknown historic and archaeological resources. As previously discussed, the proposed unit transfers would occur entirely within previously established footprints for project development as proposed in the SPA Plan, and all modifications would be subject to mitigation provided in Section 5.4. Therefore, no new or increased levels of impacts to cultural resources would result from implementation of the proposed unit transfers beyond those previously analyzed in the EIR. Geology and Soils Impacts to geology and soils are addressed in Section 5.5 of the EIR. The geotechnical analysis presented in Section 5.5 of the EIR was derived from GEOCON, Inc.'s Preliminary Geotechnical Investigations for Villages Two and Three prepared in August/September of 2003. As previously discussed, the proposed unit transfers would not exceed previously established footprints for project development as proposed in the SPA Plan, and all modifications would be subject to mitigation provided in Section 5.5. Due to the fact that proposed modifications would not increase acreage undergoing grading and excavation, no new significant impacts beyond 74-39 Addendum to EIR Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four Spa Plan FINAL those previously identified would occur. Therefore, implementation of the proposed unit transfers would not require additional analysis beyond that which is presented in Section 5.5 of the EIR, and no new impacts would occur. Greenhouse Gases Impacts resulting from greenhouse gas emissions were not addressed in the EIR. The project would not increase the severity of previously identified air quality impacts, nor would it result in any new significant effects related to air emission that were not previously identified in the EIR. Additionally, in light of the wide range of global warming activity prior to the certification of the EIR in 2006, there are no substantial changes to the circumstances under which the project will be undertaken, and no new information of substantial importance which was not known and could not have been known when the EIR was certified has since been identified. Impacts resulting from emissions of greenhouse gases would therefore be less than significant. Hazards/Risk of Upset Impacts to hazards are addressed in Section 5.14 of the EIR. The proposed SPA Plan site, including Village Two, would not be located on any hazardous site as identified in any regulatory database for hazardous materials. The proposed unit transfers would not increase building footprints within Village Two, nor would increased housing densities within portions of Village Two result in a greater risk related to the transport, use and disposal of hazardous materials than that previously analyzed. Compliance with existing regulations regarding the transport, use and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes would prevent any adverse impacts on human health and safety from the proposed action. Therefore, no additional hazards or risk of upset would occur beyond those previously analyzed with implementation of the proposed unit transfers. Housing and Population Impacts to housing and population are addressed in Section 5.8 of the EIR. The proposed unit transfers addressed in this Addendum would not result in an increase in overall unit count within Village Two; therefore, no new impacts would occur Moreover, there are currently no residents or existing housing on the proposed project site, therefore, the proposed action would not displace substantial numbers of existing housing stock or people necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. 14-40 Addendum to EIR Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four Spa Plan FINAL Water Resources and Water Quality Impacts to water quality are addressed in Section 5.9 of the EIR. Project-level water quality technical reports were completed for the proposed project and are included as Appendix A of this Initial Study (Hunsaker and Associates 2011a,b). The water quality technical reports outline three options for achieving the water quality treatment and hydromodification requirements of the City of Chula Vista. These three options are: • Option 1 -Water Quality Treatment and Hydromodification will be achieved within Neighborhoods R-6, R-8A, R-8B, and R-9B with pavers in courtyards/driveways underlain with adequate bioretention storage for water quality and hydromodification. • Option 2 -Water Quality Treatment and Hydromodification will be achieved by upsizing the approved regional Stormfilter to account for re-entitled areas (R-6, R-8A, R-8B, R- 9B) owned by the project applicant, and by constructing a regional underground detention vault for hydromodification. • Option 3 -Water Quality Treatment and Hydromodification will be achieved by upsizing the approved regional Stormfilter to account for all re-entitled areas (R-6, R-7, R-8A, R- 8B, R-9A, R-9B) within Village Two, and by constructing a regional underground detention vault for hydromodification. The proposed unit transfers would continue to comply with all applicable rules and regulations including compliance with NPDES permit requirements for urban runoff and storm water discharge. Best Management Practices (BMPs) for design, treatment and monitoring for storm water quality would be implemented as delineated in the EIR with respect to municipal and construction permits. Compliance with all applicable rules and regulations governing water quality as well as implementation of all mitigation measures outlined in Section 5.9 of the EIR and the measures outlined in the water quality technical reports (Hunsaker and Associates 2011 a,b) would ensure no additional impacts to water quality beyond those previously analyzed. Land Use, Planning and Zoning Impacts to land use are addressed in Section 5.1 of the EIR. The proposed unit transfers would not result in any land use, planning or zoning impacts, as the proposed modification would be consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan and the Otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP). The SPA Plan would be amended to maintain consistency with the new density 14-41 Addendum to EIR Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four Spa Plan FINAL configuration. Village Two would establish higher residential densities within the Village Core due to its designation as a transit village, as described in the GDP village policies. Densities include a minimum of 18 dwelling units per acre within aquarter-mile radius of the transit station. The proposed density modifications within Village Two would support these policies. The Otay Ranch GDP designates a maximum of 709 single-family residential units and a maximum of 1,80] multi-family residential units within Village Two. The proposed unit transfers would merely shift density from R-4B, R-2Q R-23, R-24, R-25A, R-25B, and R-27 to R-6, R-8, and R-9B (Figure 3), thereby maintaining consistency with the GDP. As no overall net increase in dwelling units would occur, and given that dwelling units would be transferred from one residential zone to another, no additional land use impacts beyond those previously analyzed would result. Noise Impacts to noise are addressed in Section 5.12 of the EIR. The proposed unit transfers would not change any of the assumptions used as the basis for the noise analysis in Section 5.12 of the EIR. No new sensitive receptors or increases in construction-generated noise impacts beyond what is evaluated in the EIR would be generated by the proposed unit transfers. Traffic, Circulation, and Access Impacts to traffic aze addressed in Section 5.10 of the EIR. Aproject-specific analysis has been conducted to evaluate the potential traffic impacts associated with the unit transfers. As indicated in the traffic analysis (Fehr and Peers 2011), the proposed project would not result in an increase or decrease in overall unit count. Furthermore, rezoning the transferred units from single family to multi-family would result in a net decrease of 446 daily trips, since single family units have a higher trip generation rate than multi-family units. Density in portions of Village Two would increase, however it would decrease in other portions, thereby resulting only in minimal and insignificant changes to traffic generation and distribution patterns. Additionally, the project would include pedestrian and bicycle circulation networks, thus reducing vehicle miles traveled (VMTs) and overall demand for single-occupancy trips throughout the project area. Lastly, the unit transfers would make the overall Village Two design more supportive of transit by increasing densities in areas in close proximity to transit stops. Therefore, no new significant impacts would occur beyond what is analyzed in the EIR. 14-42 Addendum to EIR Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four Spa Plan FINAL Paleontological Resources Impacts to paleontologicalresources are addressed in Section 5.6 of the EIR. The proposed unit transfers would not alter previously planned grading, excavation or construction activities, nor would they exceed previously established footprints for project development as proposed in the SPA Plan. Additionally, all modifications would be subject to mitigation provided in Section 5.6. Therefore, no new impacts or intensification of impacts to paleontological resources would result from the proposed action beyond that previously analyzed in the EIR. Public Services and Utilities Impacts to public services and utilities are addressed in Section 5.13 of the EIR. Project-specific analyses have been conducted relative to the project's potential sewer and water impacts. As indicated in the water memorandum (Dexter Wilson 2011a; included as Appendix B), the proposed project would reduce average projected water demands by 38,800 gallons per day (gpd). This reduction is due to the units in R-6, R-8 and R-9B that will now have a density of greater than 8 units per acre, resulting in a reduced water demand per unit. As such, the water system recommendations from the May 2006 Subarea Master Plan for Village 2 remain unchanged as a result of this project. Additionally, as indicated in the sewer memorandum (Dexter Wilson 2011b; included as Appendix C), while the total projected sewage flows will not change as a result of the proposed project, the project does involve shifting 83 units from the Wolf Canyon Basin to the Poggi Basin, which results in a shift of 21,995 gpd from the Wolf Canyon Basin to the Poggi Basin. As indicated in the memorandum, the proposed project would not require additional reaches of the Poggi Canyon Interceptor to be upgraded in the future. Upon approval of the proposed project, the Development Impact Fee for the Poggi Basin would be updated to reflect the additional units. As the proposed unit transfers would not result in any increase in dwelling units beyond what was previously analyzed in the EIR, they would not place an unexpected burden or increased demand on other public services or utilities. Additionally, because the unit transfers do not propose an extension of services beyond those previously planned, they would not represent a significant growth impact. 7.0 CONCLUSION This document has identified all changed circumstances and new information and memorializes in detail the City's reasoned conclusion that none of these changes create the conditions 14-43 Addendum to EIR Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four Spa Plan FINAL requiring the preparation of a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Sections 15162 and 15163.- Pursuant to Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines and based upon the above discussion, I hereby find that approval and implementation of the proposed project will result in only minor technical changes or additions, which are necessary to make the FEIIt adequate under CEQA. Stan Donn, AICP Senior Planner Date Attachments: 1. Figures 1-3 2. Final Second Tier EIR, Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four SPA Plan, Section 1.0 -Executive Summary 14-44 Addendum to EIR Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four Spa Plan FINAL REFERENCES City of Chula Vista. 2006. Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan. Final Second Tier Environmental Impact Report. SCH No. 2003091012. May. Dexter Wilson Engineering. 2011a. Otay Ranch Village 2 Unit Transfers (Water Memorandum). October 17. Prepared for Baldwin and Sons. Dexter Wilson Engineering. 2011b. Otay Ranch Village 2 Unit Transfers (Sewer Memorandum). October 17. Prepared for Baldwin and Sons. Fehr and Peers. 2011. Village Two R-6/R-9 SPA Amendment -Traffic Impacts. May 24. Prepazed for Baldwin and Sons. Hunsaker and Associates. 2011a. Water Quality Technical Report for Otay Ranch Village Two, Neighborhoods R-8A, R-8B, and R-9B. October 11. Hunsaker and Associates. 2011b. Water Quality Technical Report for Otay Ranch Village Two, Neighborhood R-6.October 6. 14-45 f l~ Y J1 11'~ it ~ ~ ~-.: ~, ~ d '~/- ~ IEYIIw110 ~ ~~ ~® esen J ~.lt, e, f. East ~ P`m Cove ,r.. r 11 rlH JYe } I x - t S !y' Hemet Hem t y _ r ~- ~ ~l~4 ~, ~.. ~ 4 ,. ~' F '1"Cnv..2. w?ester / 't - a F ~>' IYJei Toro ~~~> s'"F ~-, L ,'+ ~j t' t~- jr r r .~j~~f t i ,~ ,. None rf 2s ~ , DS note ~` 1,1 r1 ~"+~., •TTT~~~-7~//1T ~y`~i_ yt J Taro Rancho ~ \ 1~ 5~.r y~ r 9 \ ',Santa Margantz~ sy 'L ^~ r of t ~a!.j e ~(~jr ~J11~ r.; Ilpuna Mission ~~ De ' l f S. ~, WIIEBm`erry y ~ ~. ~.. t s o a j { a uw ~~,~ Hi9hlenES f ~ y ' ~ .. ,rev ~~ 39ueTl'1 ~JuSn j r#. r" .aF ~/i Temecula t .+}f ":f` ~~~~L' 4 rgCaPisUa{nolttlF~oi~9art ~. ! ~ ~~ r ~ r..R!i Y y. ~ x! =.r 1 \Ddnd / L Up l r~~ ~ t G" . Clemente San ~, ',~7~;}~ f f '! ~ ~"' ~ `R tde (roan i'~eoen~l?~' r ~ r. „I}'+7„ yRa~ oqui ~~~ ,r~ • ~~Yr =5ert~teg~ nt • a~,r~r t r ! ,.a 7 r Fallbrook ~q qtr t't... ~ __ ~'rlr rr. ~'i m ~~ ~ !r~.u.-! ~~t """ y~~.. ~! t ~ t ~ P''3 ~ ~/t},~'+y~F .Y ~~ f. ! .~,{~ i.,, tel. Camp ~i ! 1 +Yii/r { #' Pe tllelgn y t Nodh .: ., tF aV ~ ~ ~. r Fpa N f BOnsall ~ ~ ! ~ fiTij~'" x J x Jf . ~/ ~t .. wz f yJ~~ a~ _ ., i .Borte Camp~Pentllelon =s, 'HidEenf 5 j ~T{,% f t ~ '~ ~ Spnn atlavs Valley T_ ~ y .+'' ,,~~JJ SoNh Oceans tle Msta ~i ~:r r t0~rx- J tX~ .y.. ~~ "d 'vd!'~ ",T/-: r ::, San . ^~"' ~1 J !f! ? .-., r ~ Marws Escgnhtlq ~J1 t F' 1~'1~/h J` .p Cadsbatle~ '' J II yy.~. "x~..'"y'~„++d, "" .r f t / Y ~/i ./Y a .. ~ - _" t~ ! pq~y++ `y', I t• r~~A ;v ,r. ~i~ !• ,Julian { '1~~.. { 1 J! .r 11~ ~ &'d 1 t ~r ~••. .~ l~~~lf. I Enani t~ ~ in' j~p kartwna L"': j'. ,J _ *~L y"',~ t San Dregq ~ Z t L. ! ~ !n f ., r '64~..N ~4+>~ Caun / r1+ ~ ~ .+I" 1 ~Jr ~ ~POwaY; ? ~ i~'r~ ,<tafes~~/ Y San Diego. /A Jy/y`N r>~J~ ;'J!jt ~~1~hv Ft f~~ ~xlri l"- .-ix „/_ ~ ~.. I,+eI Sallee Lakesitl __ SrY NPirie' . .': „ Pine!'') f •y ® Y Harbisgn '' ~ValleY . S~.r t t' ) S`tt 'OrCalon ~e~~(j~ ""''v.%Y.~t. ~S ~~f 1 I. .,J Lai 1Casa dell_j r_' a ! ~`tf r,~ ~ • f { '~" t Mesa. Om M~Nrelix ~y ~}, TTT J r ~ bemon' ~RarKh~Ban ., fi .PJ~ .! . ' "f._ $JIa 1 r~ ~~ `.. Grovel ValleY~ a ~Janul ~ ~ ~A~ p 1 J• ~ S 1} J ~~ CoronatlO fir Fd- 1T+ ~ ~..s .~''d~~ tl ~r kt'~;,. ``\ N hon I Bonita. ~! ~: ~, 'tr ~'# e~i ~ .~ Project Site l.~~r ` '~~ ~ + *- •-'- •- S' f: ~ P a c i f i c O c e a n Imp dI V~ ~~' `° ''~". '~ `~^~ ~' ~'- ' ~' Beach ~",y. . M e x i c o a s to u °s a 'Miles DUDEK FIGUREI - Regional Map ~, s7e2-ol ADDENDUM TO EIR - OTAY RANCH VILLAGE TWO, THREE, AND A PORTION OF VILLAGE FOUR SPA PLAN 14-46 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~r 1~ ~ i~~ F~ Gi , '~ ~~~1 ~ ~ ( ~ 1~~ ~ f ~ ~~~~ t l~((jj, p~~~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ Z a / ~ , l ~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ I ~ ~~ ~, ~,, ~^ L' 8 ' ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ O //////~// //) I t ` i , ~ •~ ~ ~ o ~L ~~~ rA ~, i r ~ d ` 1 (/~~ ~ ~(~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~` '4~5"` 7~ ~ ~ r ,s, e ~ ~ ~" ~ ~~ ~a- 5 ' ~ ~ ~S ~ w ~ ~, ~ 7 f~ ~ ~ i1, ~A ~ t \ i ~ ' ~ ~ ~, ~ RRR ~ ~~; ~ , ~ S \ . ~ Fl.\, ~~ ~.+: )~uM ti •~ % + ^~~ / ° ~ I~ ;r~'iJ Z k , w ~ 4 ~( ~ I 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Cr ~ V„- ~ 1 _~`~ /~ . . Y ~ ~ )~rp \ ~ ~_ ~ ~ ~ 1 /r~) ~ ~ ~r 1. J I - - Z 1 ,~''F ~ ~ m n ~ O ~ H ~ ~ __. , ~ I ~~~. , 1 y( ~~~y j+~' ~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~' o .:~ S~ Ali ~ ~i ~\, r v I v q l2 ~'S R-4b DECREASE 30 UNITS EXISTING: PROPOSED: ZONE: SF3 SF2 UNITS: 98 68 ~~.. ;off ~,a.~. v< ~~tQ fld 9 R R-25a DECREASE 10 UNITS EXISTING: PROPOSED: ZONE: SF4 SF4 UNITS: 34 24 ~ R-25b DECREASEIO UNITS ~ EXISTING: PROPOSED: ~ ZONE: SF4 SF4 UNITS: 34 24 R-24 DECREASE 13 UNITS EXISTING: PROPOSED: ZONE: SF3 SF3 UNITS: 41 2A R-23 DECREASE 23 UNITS EXISTING: PROPOSED: ZONE: SF3 SF3 UNITS: ]1 48 D U D E K ~ SOURCE'. Baldwin and Sons, LLC 2011 FIGURE 3 Unit Transfers 6838-Od ADDENDUM TO EIR-OTAY RANCH VILLAGE TWO, THREE ANDA PORTION OF VILLAGE FOUR SPA PLAN ~ R-8 INCREASE 27 UNITS EXISTING: PROPOSED: ZONE: SF3 SF3(Rea); RM1(R8b) UNITS: 50 4fl(RBaI; 291R8b) 11M 'R-E cg ~ X91 \ I RB1 E' p.ie i~.. fl-:~ S. x cvF "cam. ~H-aU R g °.a ~~8 ~ R_g fl H H9 nae .. q' M~ AS 2aw 0 P 1~ m R5 HIO ~ MU2 _ ~a 5 e°9 ~ I~ s. ~ nn _., c, p"2N ~ ~P < R-6 INCREASE 83 UNITS ~~ u x ~~ fi . ~ °' '? EXISTING: PROPOSED '- /~ - -- ZONE: SF4 RMt N UNITS: 63 126 [/ R-27 ~ PIBP fl ~ . A fl w~ ~ _ °~ 3 s Rn~ N j~ , " f~ R-27 DECREASE 19 UNITS A'26 w R-258!; ¢A-` EXISTING: PROPOSED: (~ '+ I; ZONE: RMl RMl If ~ ~ ~ UNITS: 80 61 I~ ~~ p BASED ON SU6STANTIAL CONFORMANCE TM M APPROVED I-10.088ADMINISTRATIVE DRG -23 ~ APPROVALS DATED 8-21-10 8 62&10 4 LEGEND n ®Decrease in Units R-20 nz~ ~ I ,~~ ,~ ~~ ~ ~ Increase in Units 1 `k .~ ,~ _ ~ ~ p ~ R-20 DECREASE 8 UNITS ~`\ z ~:~ ~~ ~$ ZONE: CXISTING: PROPOSED: SF3 SF3 -'ir.r~u u ~ r+.u ~ .. UNITS : 83 75 NOT TO SCALE ' R-gb INCREASE 23 UNITS EXISTING: PROPOSED: ZONE: SF4 RMI UNITS: 45 6A ~~~ jj .~. - CITY OF CHULA VISTA Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Final Second Tier Environmental Impact Report Second Tier EIR 02-02 SCH No. 2003091012 May 2006 276 Fourth Ave. • Chula Vista • California • 91910 14-49 1.0 Executive Summary 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is an informational document intended for use by the City of Chula Vista, other public agencies, and members of the general public in evaluating the potential environmental effects of the Villages Two, Three, and a portion of Village Four Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan located in Otay Ranch, Chula Vista, California. The SPA Plan is a document that refines and implements the land use plans, goals, and objectives of the Otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP) for the development of Villages Two, Three, and a portion of Village Four. This EIR tiers from the Otay Ranch GDP Program Final EIR (EIR 90-01, SCH #89010154), in accordance with CEQA Section 21093. This EIR focuses on the actual environmental effects associated with development of the proposed SPA Plan that were not evaluated at a project level in the Otay Ranch GDP Program EIR and updates information in the Otay Ranch GDP Program EIR pertaining to the SPA Plan area to reflect any changes in the project or its circumstances since original approval of the Otay Ranch GDP Program EIR. This summary provides a brief synopsis of the project description, project alternatives considered, and results of the environmental analysis contained in this EIR. By necessity, this summary does not contain the extensive background and analysis found in the document. Therefore, the reader should review the entire document to fully understand the project and its environmental consequences. 1.1 Proiect Location and Bettina Otay Ranch lies within the East Planning Area of the city of Chula Vista. Interstate 805 (I-805) bounds the East Planning Area on the west, San Miguel Mountain and State Route 54 on the north, the Otay Reservoirs and the Jamul foothills on the east, and the Otay River valley on the south. The SPA Plan area is located roughly in the center of the East Planning Area. The SPA Plan area is located at the western edge of the Otay Valley Parcel of the Otay Ranch GDP area. The SPA Plan area is bounded by Olympic Parkway to the north and La Media Road to the east. Village Two occupies the northern portion of the area located to the east of Heritage Road. A portion of Village Two, "Village Two West," is located to the west of Heritage Road. Village Three is located in the southern portion of the SPA Plan area on the east and west sides of Heritage Road. Village Four is located to the south of Village Two proper. The SPA Plan area is topographically diverse with elevations ranging from 240 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) in the southern portions to 535 feet AMSL in the northeastern portion. The Project area consists of rolling hills in its central portion and relatively steep tributary canyons in its northern and southern portions. Numerous Page 1-1 14-50 1.0 Executive Summary drainages trend north to south into Wolf Canyon, and one easUwest-trending drainage occurs in the northeastern portion of the site. The predominate land uses onsite are cattle grazing and vacant land. There are a number of dirt roads traversing the project site. The project area is surrounded by other Otay Ranch development areas including Villages One and Five located to the north of Olympic Parkway and Villages Six and Seven located to the east of La Media Road. The Otay Landfill is located south of Village Two West and west of Heritage Road. 1.2 Project Background Villages Two, Three, and Four are a part of the designated fourteen villages and five planning areas within the Otay Ranch GDP area. Otay Ranch is amaster-planned community encompassing approximately 23,000 acres and includes a broad range of residential, commercial, retail, and industrial development. Civic and community uses- such as libraries, parks, and schools-and about 11,375 acres of open space are also included in the community. The Otay Ranch GDP was adopted by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista and the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Diego in October 1993. Both agencies were involved in the development and approval of the plan because the planning area included land falling within the jurisdiction of both agencies. The Otay Ranch GDP established goals and objectives for the development of the area. As part of the review and approval process for the Otay Ranch GDP, a Program EIR was prepared. Under the implementation program for the Otay Ranch GDP, SPA plans are required to be approved before final development entitlements can be considered. The proposed SPA plan will further refine the development standards, land plans, goals, objectives, and policies for Villages Two, Three, and a portion of Village Four. The Otay Ranch GDP calls for a mixture of residential densities in Village Two, combined with parks, community purpose facilities, schools, and commercial areas. Village Two is located between two scenic canyons and adjacent to the Otay Landfill. There is a 1,000-foot landfill buffer area located at the southern edge of Village Two West, and the western edge of Village Two proper. The adopted Otay Ranch GDP, as well as a landfill agreement between the City of Chula Vista and the County of San Diego, currently specify that only industrial development and public, quasi-public, and open space (parks and recreation facilities and open space, agriculture, and reserve) are allowed within the landfill buffer area. The adopted Otay Ranch GDP includes industrial uses in Village Three. This document is a Second Tier EIR addressing the adoption of a SPA Plan for Villages Two, Three, and a portion of Village Four of the Otay Ranch GDP. The document was Page 1-2 14-51 1.0 Executive Summary prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970 as amended and the guidelines of the City of Chula Vista. 1.3 Project Description The proposed SPA Plan is comprised of the following land use components: 2,786 dwelling units (986 single-family and 1,800 multi-family units) on approximately 335.1 acres and three industrial areas on 87.9 acres within Village Two and a 176.5-acre business park within Village Three. Village Four contains a 44.2-acre community park site. The remaining acres would be developed with non-residential uses, including community purpose facilities, schools, public parks, commercial uses, open space, two pedestrian bridges, and circulation rights-of-way. The proposed project would require an amendment to the City of Chula Vista General Plan, the Otay Ranch GDP, the Phase 1 and 2 Resource Management Plan (RMP), a Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan Boundary Adjustment and an amendment to the County of San Diego Otay Subregional Plan (SRP) and County adopted RMP Preserve Conveyance Plan. The discretionary actions which this EIR applies and the agency responsible are listed below: City of Chula Vista: • Adoption of the SPA Plan and Associated Documents of the SPA Plan. The associated documents in the SPA Plan include: the Public Facilities Financing Plan; Village Design Plan; Planned Community (PC) District Regulations; Air Quality Improvement Plan; Water Conservation Plan; and the Non-Renewable Energy Conservation Plan for Villages Two, Three, and a portion of Village Four. City of Chula Vista General Plan Amendment. The proposed Chula Vista General Plan Amendment includes provisions to: 1) Process a boundary adjustment to the Chula Vista MSCP Preserve to accommodate proposed grading limits for Village Two, as well as to include additional lands in the MSCP Preserve within the northern portion of Wolf Canyon. The proposed project places fill in an area within the boundaries of the MSCP Subarea Preserve; therefore, approval of this project requires the modification of the boundary of the preserve area; 2) Pursuant to the 1995 agreement with the Wildlife Agencies incorporated in the County of San Diego MSCP Suabarea Plan and consistent with the City's Subarea Plan, amend the Phase 1 and Phase 2 RMP to delete Preserve areas in Village Two West. In anticipation of the eventual enactment of MSCP Page 1-3 14-52 1.0 Executive Summary Subarea Plans for both the City and the County, the applicant's predecessor in interest (The Baldwin Company) negotiated a modification of the Otay Ranch GDP to meld the RMP and MSCP into a single regulatory plan. Some of the basic elements were the removal of a "potential avian corridor" between Wolf Canyon and Village Two West, and elimination of the coastal sage scrub restoration requirements. These amendments are required to bring the General Plan into consistency with the terms of the 1995 agreement. Otay Ranch General Development Plan Amendment. The proposed Otay Ranch General Development Plan Amendment includes provisions to: 1) Adjust the permissible number of units in Village Two from a maximum of 2,510 units to 2,786 units in order to reflect the above-referenced amendments and SPA Plan; 2) Refine the Otay Ranch GDP developmenUpreserve boundaries within Wolf Canyon to accommodate proposed grading limits for Village Two, and include additional lands in the MSCP preserve within the northern portion of Wolf Canyon; 3) Pursuant to the 1995 agreement with the Wildlife Agencies, amend the Otay Ranch Phase 1 and Phase 2 RMP to delete Preserve areas in Village Two West by removing the "potential avian corridor" between Wolf Canyon and Village Two West and eliminating the coastal sage scrub restoration requirements; and 4) Permit Villages Two, Three, and all subsequent Villages to convey any Otay Ranch Preserve lands in satisfaction of each Village's conveyance requirement. • Phase One and Two Resource Management Plan Amendment. An amendment to the Phase One and Two Resource Management Plan to: 1) Refine the Otay Ranch RMP preserve boundary to accommodate proposed grading limits for Village Two, and to include additional lands in the RMP preserve within the northern portion of Wolf Canyon. The proposed project places fill in an area within the boundaries of the MSCP Subarea preserve. Approval of this project requires the modification of the boundary of the Preserve area. Page 1-4 14-53 1.0 Executive Summary 2) Amendments to the RMP are proposed to reflect the modified Preserve boundaries resulting from the 1995 Wildlife Agencies Agreement. In anticipation of the eventual enactment of MSCP Subarea Plans for both the City of Chula Vista and the County of San Diego, the applicant's predecessor in interest (The Baldwin Company) negotiated with City of Chula Vista, the County of San Diego, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the California Department of Fish and Game to modify the GDP to meld the RMP and MSCP into a single regulatory plan. The basic elements of the letter agreement were: (1) elimination and reduction of development areas in the Proctor Valley and San Ysidro Mountain parcels; (2) increases in development footprints on the Otay Valley Parcel; (3) realignment of Otay Valley Road/Hunte Parkway; (4) apportionment of Preserve management responsibilities; (5) elimination of the special study area in Village 13; (6) removal of a "potential avian corridor" between Wolf Canyon and Village Two West; and (7) elimination of the requirements for restoration of coastal sage scrub. The Preserve design depicted in the MSCP Subarea Plans for both the City of Chula Vista and County of San Diego reflect the Preserve boundary considerations from the 1995 Wildlife Agencies Agreement. However, an amendment to the RMP to address the elimination of the coastal sage scrub restoration requirements is required to bring the RMP into consistency with the terms of the agreement. As a result of the 1995 agreement with the Wildlife Agencies, the Otay Ranch GDP was previously amended for items b, c, and d below; however, the Otay Ranch RMP was not amended at that time. The following actions are required to bring the RMP into compliance with the 1995 agreement and the Otay Ranch GDP. The following Otay Ranch RMP amendments are proposed: a) Delete the "Potential Avian Corridor" between Village Two West and Wolf Canyon; b) Eliminate three development areas totaling approximately 139 acres at the east end of Village 13, and thereby convert the land to open space preserve; c) Eliminate the development designation from approximately 98 acres at the southwest edge of Village 15, and thereby convert the land to open space preserve; d) Expand the development area by approximately 62 acres within Village One and Village One West; Page 1-5 14-54 1.0 Executive Summary e) Delete Preserve areas in Village Two West; and f) Eliminate the Otay Ranch RMP coastal sage scrub restoration requirement. 3) Amend the Phases 1 and 2 of the RMP to permit Villages Two, Three, and all subsequent Villages to convey any Otay Ranch Preserve lands in satisfaction of each Village's conveyance requirement. The applicant is proposing to amend the GDP, the RMP, and the Phase 2 RMP to permit Villages Two, Three, and all subsequent Villages to convey any Otay Ranch Preserve lands in satisfaction of each village's conveyance requirement. This amendment reflects: (1) changes in the circumstances related to the Otay Ranch project (as further discussed in Section 3.1 Land Use) since the adoption of the current conveyance schedule (hereinafter referred to as the "SPA One Conveyance Schedule') and (2) the fact that over 75 percent of the Preserve land included in the SPA One Conveyance Schedule is now, or is approved to be, offered for dedication to the Preserve Owner Manager ("POM"). • City of Chula Vista Multiple Species Conservation Program. Concurrent with the processing of the SPA Plan, the project includes a Chula Vista MSCP boundary adjustment to accommodate proposed grading limits for Village Two, as well as to include additional lands in the MSCP preserve within the northern portion of Wolf Canyon. • Tentative Subdivision Maps. Concurrent with the processing of the SPA Plan, the project applicant is processing a composite tentative map for Village Two and the park within a portion of Village Four within the Otay Ranch Company and the Stephen and Mary Birch Foundation ownership. Potential impacts resulting from implementation of the proposed composite tentative map are also evaluated as part of this EIR. County of San Diego: • County of San Diego, Otay Subregional Plan, Volume 2 and County RMP Preserve Conveyance Plan. Amend the RMP to accomplish one of the following: (a) modify the conveyance guidelines and schedule to, among other things, address conveyance issues created by the multiple ownership of preserve land; or (b) expand the currently adopted conveyance schedule to include additional preserve land. Page 1-6 14-55 1.0 Executive Summary County Department of Environmental Health - Voluntary Assistance Program. Program to ensure that contaminated soils are disposed of in accordance with local requirements. Army Corps of Engineers: Issuance of a Section 404 Permit. Regulating discharge of fill into waters of the U.S. California Department of Fish and Game: • Issuance of a Streambed Alteration Agreement Ensuring compliance with Section 1602 of the California Fish and Game Code. Regional Water Quality Control Board: • Issuance of Section 401 Certification and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Permit. Ensuring compliance with federal, state, and local water quality regulations such as the Clean Water Act and NPDES permit regulations. With the adoption of a SPA Plan, specific development can occur only after the approval of a variety of permits and maps. Subsequent environmental review may be required for these actions. The Planned Community District Regulations provide the applicable zoning regulations for the SPA Plan. The regulations are intended to implement the goals and policies of the Chula Vista General Plan, the Otay Ranch GDP, and the SPA Plan by establishing land use districts and standards for each district. The regulations provide the basis by which the City would review and evaluate the preliminary and final drawings for subsequent development applications, and provide guidance at the design review level. There are currently four land owners within the SPA Plan boundary: (1) the Otay Project, L.P.; (2) the Stephen and Mary Birch Foundation; (3) Otay Ranch Investments, LLC; and (4) the Flat Rock Company. Concurrently with the SPA Plan for Villages Two, Three, and a portion of Village Four, the project applicant is processing a Composite Tentative Map for Village Two and the park within a portion of Village Four within the Otay Project, L.P. and Otay Ranch Investments, LLC ownerships. Page 1-7 14-56 1.0 Executive Summary 7.4 Environmental Analysis Section 21002 of CEQA requires that an environmental impact report identify the significant effects of a project on the environment and provide measures or alternatives that can mitigate or avoid those effects. Pursuant to Sections 15163 and 15152 of the CEQA Guidelines, this document incorporates by reference, or is tiered off of, previous environmental documents covering environmental issues relevant to the approval and development of the SPA Plan. Table 1-1 provides a summary of the previous environmental documents from which this EIR has been tiered or which have been incorporated by reference. The Public Facilities Finance Plan (PEEP) (Burkett and Wong 2006) documents the timing and nature of many activities associated with the proposed project and required mitigation measures. This EIR references elements of that PFFP throughout this document and incorporates that PFFP by reference. TABLE 1-1 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Date Document Project 1989 City of Chula Vista General Plan EIR General Plan Update 1993 Final Program EIR for the Otay Ranch Otay Ranch General Development and General Development Plan/Sub- Subregional Plan Regional Plan EIR (90-01) 1995 City of Chula Vista Sphere of Influence Amend the City of Chula Vista's Sphere of Update Final Program EIR (94-03) Influence to include Planning Areas 1, 2, 3, &4 1995 Otay Ranch SPA One and Annexation SPA Plan EIR for SPA One Final Second Tier EIR (95-01) 1998 Final Second Tier EIR for Otay Ranch SPA Plan EIR for SPA One West SPA One and GDP/SRP Amendments (EIR 97-03) 1996 Otay Water District Water Resources Update of Water Resources Master Plan, Master Plan, Final Master EIR (EIR 97- Programmatic EIR 04) 1999 Olympic Parkway Mitigated Negative Extension of Olympic Parkway Declaration (IS 00-33) 2000 Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan Final Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan EIR/EIS 2002 Revised Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Revised Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan Plan Supplemental EIR/EA 2005 Villages Two and Three and a portion of SPA Plan for Villages Two and Three and a Village Four SPA Plan portion of Village. Four 2005 City of Chula Vista General Plan Update General Plan Update EIR The environmental issues identified in the Initial Study for assessment in the EIR include land use planning and zoning, circulation and access, land uselurban design, air quality, Page 1-8 14-57 1.0 Executive Summary noise, landform alteration/visual quality, agriculture, public services and utilities, biological resources, cultural resources, paleontology, geology and soils, hydrology/water quality, housing and population, hazards/risk of upset, growth inducement, and cumulative impacts. Table 1-2 summarizes the potentially significant environmental impacts and proposed mitigation measures by major issue as analyzed in Section 5.0 of this EIR. Please refer to this section for detailed information on impacts and specific mitigation measures. The last column of this table indicates whether the impact would be reduced to below a level of significance with implementation of proposed mitigation. 1.5 Proiect Alternatives Alternatives to the proposed project are evaluated in Section 10.0 of this EIR in terms of their ability to meet the primary objectives of the proposed project and eliminate or further reduce its significant environmental effects. The alternatives considered are no development (No Project Alternative) and three reduced development alternatives (Reduced Development Alternatives A, B, and C). Alternative .site locations were considered as part of the analysis for the Otay Ranch GDP and were addressed in the Otay Ranch GDP Program EIR. The No Development/No Project alternative assumes that the area within the SPA Plan would not be developed. Limited agriculture could be reintroduced. Population growth that would have been accommodated at this location would occur elsewhere. The Reduced Development Alternative A designates the proposed SPA Plan area for low-medium residential at three to six dwelling units per acre, distributed around a Village Core, which includes higher density single- and multi-family residential use, an elementary school site, a community park site, amixed-use site, two neighborhood park sites, and research and limited industrial uses. Under the Reduced Development Alternative A 1,133 single-family and 586 multi-family units would be designated within the project area. A total of 335.3 acres would be designated for residential use, with 266.9 acres planned for industrial uses, 348.0 acres for open space, and 18.7 acres for commercial use, 35.0 park acres, 8.1 CPF acres, and 10.0 acres for a school. There would be no development within Wolf Canyon for this alternative. The Reduced Development Alternative B designates Village Two as a "transit village' served by the future extension of the Bus Rapid Transit, which integrates SANDAG's adopted Transit First! Strategy into the Otay Ranch and locates a station within Village Two. The station location in Village Two would serve as a vital stop for travel to other Otay Ranch and regional destinations. The Reduced Development Alternative B would designate 709 single-family units and 1,801 multi-family units within the project area including 361.8 acres for residential use, 11.9 acres for commercial use, 266.9 acres for Page 1-9 14-58 1.0 Executive Summary industrial uses, 379.5 acres for open space, 58.6 acres for a park, and 9.7 CPF acres. There would be 10.1 acres planned for a school. There would be no development within Wolf Canyon for this alternative. The Reduced Development Alternative C includes approximately 2,393 residential units, of which 1,130 units are single-family and 1,263 units are multi-family and approximately 255.1 acres of industrial development. Approximately 50.6 acres of Industrial land would be situated on the southern portion of Village Two West within the landfill buffer area; the remainder of Village Two West, which is not located in the landfill buffer, would be single-family residential. Approximately 28 acres of industrial land would also be located on the westernmost portion of Village Two proper within the landfill buffer. The Industrial uses proposed within the landfill buffer are consistent with the adopted GDP. The remaining acres would be developed with non-residential uses, including community purpose facilities, schools, a public park, commercial uses, open space, and circulation rights-of-way. This alternative would include two neighborhood parks, the park in Village Four, and a single two-laned spine road connecting La Media and Heritage Roads. There would be no development within Wolf Canyon for this alternative. Page 1-10 14-59 TABLE t-2 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION Impact _ Mitigation Measures Signifcance after Mitigation Land Use The SPA Plan area is currently undeveloped, but is planned for No feasible mitigation measures have been identified to reduce this impaG to less than Significant and not development in the City's General Plan and the Otay Ranch GDP. The significant levels. mitigable. proposed design and layout of land uses for the SPA Plan would 6e compatible with one another, as well as be compatible with surrounding communities. The area surrounding the proposed SPA Plan area consists of recently developed or planned development, and therefore, development of the proposed SPA Plan woultl not physically divide an established community. However, consistent with the contusion in the Program EIR, development of the SPA Plan and wmposite TM would result in a significant change in the character of the site from undeveloped to developed urban use. This impact would remain a significant unavoidable impact. The proposed GDP/RMP amendment to eliminate the SPA One No mitigation measures are required because no signifcant impacts were identified - Conveyance Schedule al this time allows for additional Preserve land area ~ outside the adapted SPA One Conveyance Schedule to be conveyed, I which would provide important habitat linkages to other Preserve areas rn identified in the MSCP and Chula Vista Subarea Plan, and facilitates O completion of the Otay Ranch Preserve over the long-tens. There woultl 6e no significant land use impact resulting from the elimination of the SPA One Conveyance Schedule. With adoption of the proposed General Plan and Otay Ranch GDP No mitigation measures are required because no signifcant impacts were identified. amendments, implementation of the SPA Plan would not conflict with an adopted plan, policy or regulation established tq avoitl environmental effects. The proposed RMP amendments would not adversely affect the ability to No mitigation measures are required because no significant impacts were identified. meet all of the objectives, pglices, standards and guidelines related to conservation of biological resources and design and confguration of the Otay Ranch Preserve. The modifed preserve design provides for better contiguity of habitat and inGudes areas that are already being managed for recovery (maritime succulent scrub revegetation area), that were not included in the original Preserve design. As a result, the proposed Boundary Adjustment provides for higher biological value of the Preserve, and, therefore, no significant impacts would result. Page 1-11 TABLE 1-2 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION (continued) Conservation thresholds far CSS in the Program EIH nave nearly peen satisfied. Anticipated impacts to CSS have been reduced because of acquisition and preservation of land that had previously been plannetl for development. There would be no significant land use impacts resulting from the elimination of the CSS restoration requirement. Lantlfonn Alteration/Aesthetics The Otay Ranch GDP Program EIR concluded that the overall change to the original Otay Ranch topography and the change from a coral to more urban use constitute a signifcant, unavoidable landform and aesthetic impact. While the proposed SPA Plan would be in accordance with the adapted GDP and consistent with adjacent and planned development, a significant visual character and landform impact would result from implementation of the proposed SPA Plan and Composite TM. Development woultl require grading of the project area. Grading of the site would involve the cut and fll of approximately 18,428,000 cubic yartls. This grading woultl permanently alter the natural landform of the site which ~ would be significant. A portion of Wolf Canyon would be filled to a height ~ of 400 feet, approximately 90 to 100 feet above the canyon bottom. A I 100-foot-high slope would be created within Wolf Canyon. The ranch-wide ~ steep slope preservation standard would be met, therefore, avoiding a significant impact. However, the filling of Wolf Canyon is considered signifcant landform alteration impact. mitigation measures are required because no significant impacts were the impact more 5.2-i Pdor to approval of grading plans, the applicant(s) shall prepare grading and Less than significant building plans that conform to the landform grading guidelines contained in the proposed SPA Plan and the City of Chula Vista grading ortlinance, fhe Otay Ranch GDP, and General Plan. The plans shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building and the City Engineer. Development of the proposed SPA Plan and the Composite TM would 5.2-2 Prior to approval of the site-specifc master plan for the community park in Village Less than significant result in long-term direct potentially signifcant nighttime view impacts. The Four, the applicant(s) shall provide funding through the payment of PAD fees for direct lines of sight to the feld lighting and the general illumination over the the preparation of a lighting plan that shows the proposed height, location, and stadium and baseball field would also have long-term direct and indirect intensity of sport field and court lighting on-site. Current sport facility lighting potentially signifcant nighttime impacts. technologies including reflector devices that serve to reduce the occurrence of light spill and glare shall be used where appropnale. The plan shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building and Director of General Services. Page 1-12 TABLE 7-2 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION (continued) Sound barriers built as part of the project would represent a signifcant 5.2-3 Prior to the approval of the first rough grading permit, or firs[ a-map, the visual impact if the portion of the barrier that is constructed as a wall is applicant(s) shall have prepared, submitted to, and received approval from the higher than eight feel. Director of General Services of a comprehensive Lantlscape Master Plan (LMP). Landscaping shall occur with each phase of development in accordance with the LMP. The contents of the LMP shall conform to the City staff checklist and include the following major components: Maintenance Responsibility Plan Master Irrigation Plan Master Planting Plan Brush Management Plan Hardscape Concept and Trail Plan Utility Coordination Plan Conceptual Wall and Fence Plan, and Monumentation antl Signage Plan J tT N Page 1-13 r T W The project would have a substantial adverse effeU, both tlirectly antl through habitat modifcations, on species identifed as candidate, sensitive, and special status species in the Otay Ranch RMP, the City's MSCP Subarea Plan, and by CDFG and USFWS. The projeU would have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitats and other sensitive natural communities identifietl in the Otay Ranch RMP, the City's MSCP Subarea Plan, and by CDFG and USFWS. The project will result in impacts to non-native grasslands antl agricultural lands that would contribute to impacts to regional raptor foraging habitat. TABLE 1-2 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION (continued) Mitigation for Effects on Sensitive Species and Habitats, Including Riparian Habitats 5.3-t Pdor to recording each foal map, the property owner (s) shall either convey land within the Otay Ranch RMP Resource Preserve at a ratio of 1.188 aces for each acre of development area or pay a fee in lieu. 5.3-2 Prior to issuance of land development permits, including Gearing or grubbing and grading permits, permits for areas with salvageable resources, including Narrow Endemic Species, Planfago erects (OCB larval host planQsouth coast saltscale, and smooth-stemmed fagonia (inGuding plant materials and soils seed bank), the projeU property owner (s) shall be required to develop and implement a Resource Salvage Plan. The Resource Salvage Plan shall, at a minimum, evaluate options for plant salvage antl relocation, including native plant mulching, selective soil salvaging, application of plant materials on manufactured slopes, antl application/relocation of resources within the preserve. The Resource Salvage Plan shall include incorporation of relocation efforts for non-covered species, including south coast saltscale and smooth-stemmed fagonia. Relocation efforts may incude seed collection or transplantation to a suitable receptor site and will be based on the most reliable methods of successful relocation. The program shall also contain a recommendation for method of salvage and relocation/application based on feasibility of implementation and likelihood of success. The program shall include, but not be limited to, an implementation plan, maintenance and monitodng program, estmatetl completion time, and any relevant contingency measures. The program shall be subjeU to review and approval of the City's Director of Planning and Building. 5.3-3 Pursuant to the requirements of the RMP, mitigation beyond the conveyance requirements for impacts to maritime succulent scmb shall consist of on-site restoration al 1:1 ratio. If foal design plans indicate that impacts will be avoided, this measure will not be applicable. Pdor to issuance of land development permits, inGuding Gearing or grubbing and grading permits, that impaU maritime succulent scrub resources, the developer(s) shall prepare and implement a restoration plan to restore 3.4 acres of madtime succulent scrub (1.5 acres from impacts within the Otay Ranch Company ownership and 1.9 acres within the Flat RoUc Land Company ownership), pursuant to the Otay Ranch RMP restoration requirements. The maritime succulent scrub restoration plan shall be approved by the City's Director of Planning and Building, and shall include an implementation plan, maintenance antl monitoring program, estimated completion time, and any relevant contingency measures. Page 1-14 impacts to regional raptor foraging habitat. All other identified direct and indirect impacts- less than significant. TABLE 1-2 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION (continued) Prior to issuance of land development permits, including clearing or grubbing and grading permits in portions of the SPA Plan area that are adjacent to the Preserve, the property owner install fencing in accordance with CVMC 17.35.030. Prominently coloretl, well installed, fencing shall be in place wherever the limits of grading are adjacent to sensitive vegetation communities or other biological resources, as itlentifed by the qualifetl monitoring biologist. Fencing shall remain in place during all construction activities. All temporary and permanent fencing shall be shown on grading plans. Prior to release of grading bonds, a qualified biologist shall provitle evidence that work was conduged as authorized under the approved lantl development permit and associated plans. J I T A 5.3-5 Prior to issuance of grading permits, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be developetl, approved, and implemented during construction to control storm water runoff, such that erosion, sedimentation, pollution, etc, are minimized. The following measures contained in the Edge Plans shall be implemented to avoid the release of toxic substances associated with urban runoff: • Sediment shall be retained on-site by a system of sediment basins, traps, or other appropriate measures. • Where deemed necessary, storm drains shall be equipped with silt and oil traps to remove oils, debris and other pollutants. Storm drain inlets shall be labeled "No Dumping-Drains to Ocean " Stonn drains shall be regularly maintained to ensure their effectiveness. • The parking lots shall be designed to allow storm water mnoff to be directed to vegetative flter strips and/or oil-water separators to control sediment, oil, and other contaminants. • Permanent energy dissipaters shall be included for drainage outlets. • The SPA Plan area drainage basins shall be designed to provide effective water quality control measures. Design and operational features of the tlrainage basins shall include design features to provide maximum detention time for settling of fne particles; maximize the distance between basin inlets and outlets to reduce velocities; and establish maintenance schedules for periodic removal of sedimentation, excessive vegetation and debris. Page 1-15 TABLE 1-2 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION (continued) J 5.3.6 Prior to issuance of land development permits, inGuding Gearing or grubbing and grading permits, the following notes shall be inGuded on the plans to the satisfaction of the Environmental Review Coordinator: (1) A qualified biologist shall be on-site to monitor all vegetation clearing and periodically thereafter to ensure implementation of appropriate resource protection measures. (2) Dewatedng shall be conducted in accordance with standard regulations of the RWQCB. A permit to discharge water from dewatering activities will be required. This will minimize erosion, siltation, and pollution within sensitive communities. (3) During construction, material stockpiles shall be placetl such that they cause minimal interference with on-site drainage patterns. This will protect sensitive vegetation from being inundated with sediment-laden runoff. (4) Material stockpiles shall be covered when not in use. This will prevent tly-off that could damage nearby sensitive vegetation communities. (5) Graded area shall be periodically watered to minimize dust affecting adjacent vegetation. 5.3-7 Lighting of all developed areas adjacent to the Preserve shall be directed away from the Preserve, wherever feasible and consistent with public safety. Where necessary, development shall provide adequate shielding with non-invasive plant matedals (preferably native), berming, andlor other methods to protect the Preserve antl sensitive species from night lighting. Consideration shall be given to the use oflow-pressure sodium lighting. In compliance with the Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan, all lighting shall be shielded antl directed away from the Preserve. Prior to issuance of improvement plans, a lighting plan and photometric analysis shall be submitted to the City's Environmental review Coordinator for review and approval. The lighting plan shall illustrate the location of the proposed lighting standards and type of shielding measures. In rampliance with the Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan, low-pressure sodium lighting shall be used if feasible and shall be subject to the approval of the City's Environmental Review Coordinator and City Engineer. No nighttime construction lighting shall occur within the Preserve Edge. Page 1-16 TABLE 1.2 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION (continuetl) I tT 5.3-8 Noise impacts adjacent to the Preserve lands shall be minimized. Berms or walls shall be constructed adjacent to wmmercial areas and any other uses that may introduce noises that could impact or intertere with wildlife utilization of the Preserve. Construction activities shall indude noise reduction measures or be conducted outside the breeding season of sensitive bird species. Based on current information, these conditions would be limitetl to areas within 500 feet of Wolf Canyon. When Gearing, grading or grubbing adivities occur during the breeding season for coastal California gnatcatcher (February 15 to August 15, annually) or raptors (January 15 to July 31, annually), nesting bird surveys shall be conducted by a qualifed biologist to identify active nest locations. Constmction adivities shall 6e restricted such that noise levels related to those adivities are below 60 Lro at the location of the active nest site. 5.3-9 Prior to issuance of land development permits, including clearing or grabbing and grading permits, the property owner shall submit evidence showing that the following features of the Preserve Edge Plan have been incorporated into grading and landscaping plans: (1) No invasive, non-native plant species shall be introduced into areas immediately adjacent to the Preserve. All slopes immediately adjacent to the Preserve shall be planted with native spedes per the Preserve Edge Plan, that reflect the adjacent native habitat. (2) All fuel modification shall be incorporated into development plans and shall not indude any areas within the Preserve. 5.3-10 Prior to issuance of grading permits, the property owner shall submit wall and fence plans tlepicting appropriate barriers fo prevent unauthorized access into the Preserve. The wall and fence plans shall illustrate the locations and cross- sedions of proposed walls and fences along the Preserve boundary, subject to the approval the City's Director of Planning and Building. Page 1-17 TABLE 1-2 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION (continued) J I O) J I he pro)ect woultl nave a subslanmal adverse enact on ieaerauy prO[e~ wetlands, as defned by Section 404 of the Clean Water Ad, inGUding jurisdictional waters and vernal pools. on Federal and State Protected Wetlands 5.3-11 The City requires that impacts to wetlands be avoided to the maximum ezlent possible. When avoidance is not feasible, the property owner(s) shall be required to minimize impacts to the greatest extent possible and mitigate for loss of wetland habitat, including wetland habitat creation of at a 1:1 ratio for unvegetated waters of the U.S. and 3:1 for impacts to alluvial scrub. To mitigate direct impacts to jurisdictional waters, the following conditions would be required prior to~ issuance of land development permits, inGuding clearing or grubbing and grading permits, for any area impacting jurisdictional waters: A total of 1.1 acres of wetlands shall be created Pnor to issuance of land development permits, including Gearing or grubbing and grading permits that impact jurisdictional waters, the developer(s) shall prepare a Wetlands Mitigation Plan to the satisfaction of the wetland resource agencies and the City's Director of Planning and Building. This plan shall include, but not be limited to, an implementation plan, maintenance and monitoring program, estimated completion time, and any relevant contingency measures. Prior to issuance of land development permits, including clearing or grubbing and grading permits for areas that impact jurisdictional waters, the property owner shall provide evidence that all required regulatory permits, such as those required under Section 404 of the federal Clean Water Act, Section 1600 of the California Fish and Game Code, and the Porter Cologne Water Quality Acl. 5.3-12 One of the following options shall be implemented by the property owner(s) prior to issuance of land development permits, including Gearing or grubbing antl grading permits for areas impacting vernal pools: (1) Option #1: The property owner(s) shall restore 406 square feet of vernal pools within the J23, 24 or 25 pools (eastern Otay Mesa) or within the Village 13 (resod) planning area. The restoration would involve reconfguration and reconstruction of the mima mounds and basins, removal of weedy vegetation, revegetation of the mounds with upland sage scrub species and inoculation of the pools with vernal pool species. The property owner shall prepare a Vernal Pool Mitigation Plan to the satisfaction of the resource agencies (if applicablefjurisdictional) and the City's Director of Planning antl Building. The Plan shall incude, but not be limited to an implementation plan, maintenance and monitoring program, estimated completion time, and any relevant contingency measures. Page 1-18 TABLE 1.2 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION (continued) Option #2: The project property owner(s) shall purchase vernal pool mitigation bank credits within an approved mitigation bank. Evidence of the purchase and appropriate monitoring antl maintenance requirements shall be r I T lJD There were 16 prehistoric sites identified within the SPA Plan area. As a result of the testing of these sites, only one site, CA-SDI-12,291 B, was tletermined to be a significant historic resource. Impacts to CA-SDI- 12,297bwould be considered significant. The remaining 15 sites were determinetl not to be significant historic resources, however, grading and excavation activities associated with the proposed project could result in significant archaeological impacts to unknown subsurtace deposits. Preservation is the preferred means of avowmg Impacts to arcnaeological sne quo- ic,ca n This approach woultl involve retlesign of the project to avoid impacts to Site SDI-12,291 B. The fallowing measures outline a procedure for ensuring that adverse impacts are avoided for the proposed SPA Plan. 5.4-1 In the event that in place preservation is infeasible, the following tlata recevery program will mitigate adverse impacts to SDI-12,291 b. These tasks need to be completed prior to the issuance of grading permits for the portion of Village Three/18b on which the site is located. a) Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA) shall prepare a research design for the data recovery of Site SDI-12,297b to the satisfaction of the Environmental Review Coordinator. This research design shall identify specific research questions to be addressed through the data recovery process, the data collection and analyses needed to address those questions, and the means and location of curation of recovered materials. This research design shall be prepared prior to the initiation of the field investigation to the satisfaction of the Environmental Review Coordinator of the City of Chula Vista. b) Based on the approvetl research design, an excavation program shall be implemented that will result in a reliable sample of the site. It is anticipated that between two and four percent of the surtace area of the mapped resource would be excavated, and that excavation would be completed by hand excavated one-by-one meter units, unless the questions developed for the research design require a motlified sampling strategy. All matedals should be passed through aone-eighth-inch mesh screen, with all recovered matedals catalogued and analyzed. If datable materials, faunal or goral remains, pollen, or other cultural significant materials are fountl, appropriate special analysis shall be completed. c) A detailed report of fndings shall be completed and the results made available to the public and scientific community. curation of recovered materials shall be accomplished to the satisfaction of the Environmental Review Coortlinafor of the City of Chula Vista. curation of collections from the oroiect will be curated in a facility aooroved in advance by the Citv Page 1-19 TABLE 1.2 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION (continued) There was one historic site identifed within the SPA Plan area. I he historic site, located on the Village Two project area, consists of the remains of the Otay Ranch Farm Complex. Appendix I, of the February 2004 report for cultural resources at the Otay Ranch Village Two SPA, conGuded that no historically significant remaining components were visible during site testing. However, the proposed project could result in signifcant archaeological impacts because the site may contain masked subsurface deposits that may be encountered during grading and excavation activities for the proposetl project. A qualified archaeological monitor shall be on-site dudng inifial grading of CA- SDI-11.384H)the-site. If historic archaeological material is encountered during grading, all grading in the vicinity as determined and defined by the archaeologist shall stop and its importance shall be evaluated, and suitable mitigation measures shall be developed and implemented, if necessary. Cultural material collected shall be permanently curated at an appropriate repository. Curation of collections from the oroieG will be curated in a facility aoaroved in advance by the Citv. Implementation of the proposed SPA Plan and the Composite TM would No impacts were identifietl and no mitigation is required. not disturb any human remains, incuding those interred outside of formal cemeteries. There are no known or expected human remains on the SPA property. Significant impacts could result to geology and soils from project ~ development on compressible and expansive soils. Additionally, the ~ current conceptual design would require mass grading above portions of I the tunnel that contains the San Diego waterline, including excavation of tT formulational soils and the placement of fll soils. A potentially significant ~ impact coultl result from the gratling above portions of the existing City of San Diego watedine. Implementation of projeG-specific design mitigation measures woultl reduce or avoid significant impacts. Impacts resulting from the grading above portions of the watedine would be eliminated if the waterline were relocated. Prior to the issuance of the grading permit, the applicant(s) shall verity tnat the applicable recommendations of the preliminary geotechnical investigations for Villages Two and Three prepared by Geocon (August 18, 2003 and September 3, 2003, respectively) and the preliminary geotechnical investigation for the Parcel A portion of Village Three, prepared by Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc. (October 24, 2003) have been incorporated into the project design and construction documents to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Recommendations include, but are not limited to: a) During conslruGion liquefable sails within the colluvium/alluvium shall be removed and replaced with compacted fill. Implementation of project-specifc design mitigation measures would be required to reduce or avoitl signifcant impacts resulting from compressible and expansive soils. Potential impacts resulting from geologic hazards would be reduced below a level of significance through projeG design measures, including compliance with the requirements of the governing jurisdictions, building codes (e.g., Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, and the UBC) and standard practices of the Association of Structural Engineers of California. b) During construction highly expansive soils shall be kept below finish grade. Where excavations expose highly expansive materials at finish grade, these materials shall be excavated a minimum of four feet below finish grade. Where excavations expose very highly expansive material at finish grade, these materials shall be excavated a minimum of five feet below finish grade. The excavations shall be replaced with a compacted fll soil that has a low to moderate expansion potential. No impacts Page 1-20 TABLE 1-2 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION (continued) c) During construction, the developer shall remove loose, compressible soil and replace as compacted fill in areas that will be subjected to new fll or structural loads. I J O d) During grading the developer shall construct earthen buttresses on unstable slopes with drains installed, as warranted, at the rear of the buttresses to control groundwater. e) Grading of builtling pads shall be designed so that foundations bear entirely on a relatively uniform depth of compacted fill. This may be accomplished by overexravating the cut portion of the building pad. 5.5-2 If the existing Ciry of San Diego waterline is not relocated, the fallowing mitigation measure shall be required to reduce impacts associated with grading above portions of the existing waterline. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant(s) shall consult with a pipeline specialist to evaluate the structural integrity of the pipe and tunnel and the effect of the fll loads. A deformation analysis shall be performed once fnal grades have been determined. 5.53 Prior to the issuance of the grading permit, the applicant(s) shall verify that the design of any structures would comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code and standard practices of the Association of Structural Engineers of California. Page 1-21 TABLE 7-2 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION (continued) Grading for the proposed SPA Plan antl the Composite TM would not 5.6-1 impact any known paleontological resources; proposed construction, however, may impact fossils potentially bused in the undedying formations. The occurrence of fossils within the covered bedrock cannot be evaluated prior to exposure. Areas of the Olay Formation with accumulations mf colluvial and alluvial deposits in the drainage course bottoms, the San Diego Formation, the Sweetwater Formation, and Terrace Deposits may be exposed during grading antl constmction activities. The proposed grading of the Olay Formation sandstone, the San Diego Formation, and the Sweetwater Formation would move material with high sensitivity for paleontological resources. Exposure of these formations would likely result in the unearthing of fossil remains, which coultl damage the fossils ii they were not recovered and salvaged. Destruction of the paleontological resources from these formations would be a direct, long-term, potentially significant impact. v _. Prior to approval of the grading permit, the applicant(s) shall incorporate into Less than grading plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Environmental Review Coordinator, the following: a) Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant(s) shall confirm lc the City of Chula Vista that a qualified paleontologist has been retained to carry out the following mitigation program. The paleontologist shall attend pregrade meetings to consult with grading and excavation contractors. (A qualified paleontologist is definetl as an individual with a M.S. or Ph.D. in paleontology or geology who is familiar with paleontological procedures and techniques.) b) A paleontological monitor shall be on-site at all times during the original cutting of previously undisturbed sediments of highly sensitive geologic formations (Otay, Sweetwater, and San Diego Formations) to inspect cuts for contained fossils. The paleontological monitor shall work under the direction of a qualifed paleontologist. The monitor shall be on-site on at least ahalf-time basis during the original cuts in deposits with a moderate resound sensitivity (Terrace Deposits and the Mission Valley Formation). (A paleontological monitor is defined as an individual who has experience in the collection and salvage of fossil matedals.) In the event that fossils are discovered in unknown sensitive formations, it may be necessary to increase the per-0ay field monitortng time. Conversely, if fossils are not discovered, the monitoring should be reduced. c) When fossils are discovered, the paleontologist (or paleontological monitor) shall recover them. In instances where recovery requires an extended salvage time, the paleontologist (or paleontological monitor) shall be allowed to temporarily tlirect, divert, or halt grading to allow recovery of fossil remains in a timely manner. Where deemed appropriate by the paleontologist (or paleontological monitor), ascreen-washing operation for small fossil remains shall be set up. d) Prepared fossils, along with copies of all pertinent field notes, photographs, and maps, shall be deposited (with the applicants permission) in a scientific institution with paleontological collections such as the San Diego Natural History Museum. A final summary report shall be completed which outlines the results of the mitigation program. This report shall include discussion of the methods used, stratigraphy exposetl, fossils collected, antl significance of recovered fossils. Page 1-22 r I J N Development of the SPA Plan and the Composite I M would result in a significant impact to agricultural resources, due to the loss of 858.8 acres of Farmland of Local Importance and the conversion of 321.72 acres of Grazing Land to urban uses. The loss of agdcultural land and land suitable for the production of crops would result in a significant unavoidable impact due to the incremental and irreversible loss or impairment of limited agricultural resources. This was previously addressed in the Otay Ranch GDP Program EIR and was determined to be signifcant and not fully mitigated. A statement of overritling considerations was adoptetl for this impact. Furthermore, noise, odors, insects, rodents, and chemicals associated with agricultural operations would create indirect, short-term, potentially significant impacts between the agricultural uses and urban uses. The Otay Ranch GDP planned (or the development of the SPA Plan area as well as corresponding services and infrastructure to support the community. The proposed SPA Plan would only result in an increase in population of 0.01 percent over the adopted Otay Ranch GDP. This increase would not result in a substantial change, therefore, it does not represent substan8al population growth or a signifcant direct impact on the environment. The proposed SPA Plan would not displace substantial numbers of existing housing or people necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. Therefore, no significant impacts on the environment would result. TABLE 1.2 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION (continued) 5.7-1 The agricultural plan included in the SPA Plan shall be implementetl for the area as development proceetls in the proposed SPA Plan area. The following measures shall be implemented 6y the developer to the satisfaction of the City's Director of Planning and Building: a) A 200-foot buffer between developed property and ongoing agriculture operations shall be maintained. The use of pesticides shall comply with fetleral, state, antl local regulations; b) Vegetation shall be used to shield adjacent urban development (within 400 feet) from agriculture activities where pesticides are to be applied; c) Notifcation shall be given to adjacent property owners of potential pesticide application through newspaper advertisements; and d) Fencing shall be installed, where necessary, to ensure the safety of the SPA Because no sigrnncan[ nousmg or Plan or the Composite TM, no mitt rtion impacts were iden measures are required Page 1-23 Direct impacts are less thar significant Cumulative impacts remain significant and unmitigated No impacts TABLE 1.2 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION (continued( r J W The proposed SPA Plan antl Composite TM would convert an existing 5.9-1 undeveloped site to an urban landscape with multiple land uses. In doing so, impermeable surtaces would be introduced to the project site, as well as new pollutant sources, such as automobiles and householtl products. Impermeable suraces would decrease the amount of infiltration occurring at the project site and woultl lead to runoff rates and the potential for pollutants to be introduced to water sources. Therefore, the proposed SPA Plan and Composite TM has the potential to contribute to signifcant water quality impacts. Drainage at the site wouM be altered to direct stormwater runoff into the municipal storm drain system. Pdor to issuance of a grading permit, a detailed drainage system design study shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and shall inGude but not be limited to: a) Peak runoff at each inlet, outlet, interceptor, concentration, or confluence point, both predevelopment antl postdevelopment conditions; b) The integration of the proposetl system with the existing and proposed downstream tlrainage facilities to effectively control flows within the entire system; and c) Maps showing ezisting and postdevelopment conditions for existing topography and proposetl grading plans incorporating a drainage system design with main lines and detention/desilting facilities pursuant to Section 3-202.1 of the Chula Vista Subdivision Manual; and on-site detention/desilting facilities shall be incorporated in the design for the various phases of construction and postconstruction. 5.&2 Prior to the issuance of the first grading permit, the applicant(s) shall submit a SWPPP inctuding assignment of maintenance responsibilities for review and approval by the City Engineer and the Director of Public Works. The SWPPP shall be consistent and fully comply with the requirements of the Clean Water Act and all requirements set forth in the General Construction Permit, the City of Chula Vista Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance (Storm Water Management Manual Ordinance), the City of Chula Vista Standard Urban stormwater Management Plan (SUSMP) and the City of Chula Vista Development and Redevelopment Projects Storm Water Management Standards Requirements Manual (Stone Water Management Manual). BMPs identified in the SWPPP shall inGude but shall not be limited to the following: a) Temporary erosion centrol measures designed in accordance with the Chula Vista Grading Ordinance shall be employed for disturbed areas and shown on the grading plans. b) No disturbed surfaces shall be left without erosion control measures in place during the winter and spdng months. Page 1-24 TABLE 1-2 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION (continued) and Setliment will be retained on-site by a system of sediment basins, traps, or other appropriate measures, and shown on the grading plans. d) Silt and oil antl other contaminants will be prevented from entering the storm drain system or removed from the system, by a means acceptable to the City Engineer. Storm drain inlets shall be labeled "No Dumping-Drains to Ocean." e) All parking lots shall be designed to allow storm water runoff to be directed to vegetative filter strips or oil-water separators to control sediment, oil, and other contaminants. f) Permanent energy dissipaters will be included (or drainage outlets. g) A combination of on-site stmctural and non-structural BMPS for the treatment of urban pollutants in compliance with the Municipal Pennif. J A I J A 5.9-3 Prior to issuance of all subsequent permits and approvals associated with the project inGuding but not limited to improvement plan approvals, wnstruction permits, site plan approvals, design review approvals, conditional use permits, grading permits, the applicant of such permits and/or approvals shall comply with the Clean Water Ad, the Municipal Permit, the General Constmction Permit and the Stonn Water Management Ordinance and submit a SWPPP prior to the issuance of such permits and/or approvals in compliance with the Gity's Storm Water Management Manual and the SUSMP. Tra(fc, Circulation, and Access Direct Impact The proposed SPA Plan and the Composite TM would result in a direct,. 5.10-1 Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant(s) shall pay the applicable Less than significant significant impact to the Rock Mountain Road/La Media Road intersection. Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF), as amended to design, constmct, and secure a fully actuated traffic signal, inGuding interconnect wiring, mast arms, signal heads and associated equipment, underground improvements, standards and luminaries al the Rock Mountain Road/La Media Roatl intersection. The design of the signal shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Turn lane storage lengths shall be provided as indicated in Table 5.10-16. Cumulative Impacts Less than signifcant The proposetl SPA Plan and the Composite TM would result in a 5.10-2 Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant(s) shall pay fhe applicable cumulative impact along two segments of Rock Mountain Road by year Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF), as amended, towards widening 2015: from La Media Road to SR-125 and from SR-125 to Eastlake Rock Mountain Road from La Media Road to Eastlake Parkway to six lanes or Parkway. toward an intersection improvement along Rock Mountain Road to the satisfaction of the Cily Engineer by year 2015. Page 1-25 TABLE i-2 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION (continued) after J I J The proposed SPA Plan and the Composite TM would result in cumulative 5. impacts along three segments of Rock Mountain Road by year 2030: from SR-125 to Eastlake Parkway, from La Metlia Road to SR-125, and from Main Street to La Media Road. Freeways The proposed SPA Plan antl the Composite TM would impact along the following freeway segments: • Northbountl 1-805 from Telegraph Canyon Roatl to East H Street • Southbound I-805 from Easl H Street to Telegraph Canyon Road • Southbound I-805 from Olympic Parkway to Main Street • Northbound I-805 from Olympic Parkway to Telegraph Canyon Roatl • Southbound I-805 from Telegraph Canyon Road to Olympic Parkway • Southbound I-805 from Olympic Parkway to Main Street Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant(s) shall pay the applicable Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF), as amended, toward widening Rock Mountain Road from Main Street to Eastlake Parkway to eight lanes or towards an intersection improvement along Rock Mountain Road, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer by year 2030. 6esathar~Significant 5.10-4 For the fallowing freeway segments, adtlitional lanes would be requiretl to maintain acceptable LOS. The City of Chula Vista recommends continued freeway planning efforts and deficiency planning by Caltrans and SANDAG will determine mitigation sfrategies for the regional freeway system. Protect Access Access related impacts would occur if appropriate lane confgurations are 5.10-5 not provided al the project driveways. • Northbound I-605 from Telegraph Canyon Road to East H Street • Southbound I-805 from East H Street to Telegraph Canyon Road • Southbound I-805 from Olympic Parkway to Main Street • Northbound I-805 from Olympic Parkway to Telegraph Canyon Road • Southbound I-805 from Telegraph Canyon Road to Olympic Parkway • Southbound I-805 from Olympic Parkway to Main Street Phasing of the following improvements shall be consistent with the project PFFP and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, with intersection lane geometry per Figure 5.10-11. Prior to the approval of the foal map triggering the construction of the intersection improvements, including installation of a traTFc signal, the applicant(s) shall enter into an agreement to design, construct, and secure a fully actuated traffic signal including interconnect wiring, mast arms, signal heads and associated equipment, underground improvements, standards and luminaries at the intersections listed below. The design of the signal shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and conform to City standards. The applicant(s) shall provide turn lane storage lengths as listed in Table 5.10-i6. • Heritage Road/Olympic Parkway • Heritage Road/Main Street • Heritage Road/Street "D" • Heritage Road/Street "F" • Heritage Roatl/Street "J" North • Heritage Road/Street "J" South • Hedtage Road/Main Street • La Metlia Road/Birch Road • La Metlia Road/Santa Luna • Olympic Parkway/Street "D" Less than significant Page 1-26 TABLE 1-2 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION (continued) ~A J LT 5.16-6 Prior to the approval of the foal map containing the tIJV tnresnoio rnggenng the construction of street improvements, as definetl by the PFFP, the applicant shall enter into an agreement to design, construct, and secure full street improvements to the street segments listed below. Phasing of improvements shall be consistent with the project PFFP and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Heritage Road ~. Olympic Parkway to Sfreet "D" Street "D" to Street "F" Street "F" fo Street "J" North Street "J" North to Street "J" South Street "J" South to Main Street Heritage Road south of Main Street Main Street From Heritage Road to existing improvements East of Heritage Roatl to protect SPA boundary Street "D" Heritage Road to Street E Street E to Slate Street State Street to Santa Venetia Olympic Parkway to Heritage Road Street "E" Street "D" to Street "B" Street "B" to La Media Road La Media Road Santa Venetia to Birch Road South of Birch Road to community park entrance (or Santa Luna Road) 5.10-7 No units within the project area shall be constructed which would result in the fatal number of units within the Eastern Territories exceeding 8,990 units, prior to the construction of SR-125 between SR-54 and the International Border. The City may issue additional building permits ii the City Council determines that each of the following conditions have been met: (1) SR-125 is constmcfed and open between SR-54 and Olympic Parkway; and (2) traffic studies, prepared to the satisfaction of the Cify Engineer and the City Council, demonstrates that the opening of SR-125 to Olympic Parkway provides additional capacity to mitigate the project's cumulative significant impacts to a level below significance without exceeding Growth Management Oversight Committee traffic threshold stantlards. Additionally, the City may issue builtling permits if the City Council has approved an alternative method to implement the City's Growth Management Ordinance, as amended from time to time. Page 1-27 TABLE 1-2 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION (continued) Impact Mitigation Measures Significance after Mitigation Air Oualitv While the project conforms to many of the measures included in the RAGS 5.11-1 "Criteda to Guide the Development of Transportation Control Measures," the proposed SPA Plan project is not consistent with the growth projections of fhe local regional air quality plan. This is a significant impact. Mitigation of this planning impact would require the updating of the regional plan to reflect the general plan with the proposed project. This effort is the responsibility of SANDAG and outside the role of the Cily of 5.11-2 Chula Vista. The proposed project will result in a cumulatively significant long-term contribution to regional PM,o and ozone levels as a result of projectetl emissions of ROG, an ozone precursor. The proposed project will also result in a short-term significant fugitive dust impact as a result of emissions stemming from construction. The proposed project does not place residential uses in the landfill buffer and does not represent a significant air quality-related health risk effect ~ due to the proximity of the proposetl project to the landfill. Because the ~ proposed project will not place homes in the vicinity of the landfill, and I given the currently low number of odor complaints resulting from existing J landfll operations, odor impacts are not considered significant. J Pdor to the approval of building permits for each phase of the project, the Uirect and cumulative applicant(s) shall demonstrate that air quality control and enerdv conservation impacts remain significant measures outlined in the Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Air Quality and unmitigated Improvement Plan pertaining to the design, constmdion, and operational phases of the project have been implemented. Prior to the approval of any grading permit, the fallowing measures shall be placed as notes on all grading plans, and shall be implemented during grading of each phase of the project to minimize construction emissions: a) Minimize simultaneous operation of multiple construction equipment units; b) Use low pollutantcmitting equipment construction equipment as practical; c) Use electrical construction equipment as practical; d) Use catalytic reduction for gasoline-powered equipment; e) Use injection timing retard for diesel-powered equipment; t) Water the construction areas a minimum of twice daily to minimize fugitive dust; g) Stabilize graded areas as quickly as possible to minimize fugitive dust; h) Pave permanent roads as quickly as possible to minimize dust; i) Use electricity from power poles instead df temporary generators during building, as feasible; j) Apply chemical stabilizer or pave the last 100 feet of internal travel path within the conslrudion site prior to public road entry; k) Install wheel washers atljacent to a paved apron prior to vehicle entry on public roads; I) Remove any visible track-ouf into traveled public streets within 30 minutes of occurence; m) Wef wash the construction access point at the end of each workday if any vehicle travel on unpaved surfaces has occurred; n) Provide sufficient perimeter erosion control to prevent washout of silty material onto public roads; o) Cover haul trucks or maintain at least 12 inches of freeboard to reduce blow- off dudng hauling; and p) Suspend all soil tlisturbance and travel on unpaved surfaces if winds exceed 25 mph. Page 1-28 TABLE 1-2 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS ANO MITIGATION (continued) Potential sources of noise related to the proposed project inUUtle I ranm rvoise construction noise, traffic-generated noise, noise from the community 5.12-1 Noise barriers shall be constructed as shown on Figure 5.124 with the following Less than signifcant park, and noise from industrial uses. provisions: I J Construction activities, especially heavy equipment, would create shod- • Pdor to the issuance of any building permit for those lots within the noise term noise increases near construction areas. wntour of 65 CNEL or greater, the applicant(s) shall constmct the noise bamiers as shown on Figure 5.124. Required barrier heights may be achieved Noise within the proposed SPA Plan area would be affected by traffic through the construction of walls, berms, or walWerm combinations: With the noise on Olympic Parkway, Birch Road, La Media Road, Heritage Road, construction of barriers ranging from three to six feet along the edge of pad or and several internal streets. The traffc on area streets could generate top of slope as shown in Figure 5.124, noise levels at all ground-floor noise levels greater than the City's residential exterior standard of 65 residential usable areas and the community park site would be at or below 65 CNEL at ground-level sensitive receptors adjacent to most of the analyzed CNEL. As indiwtetl in Figure 5.124, the noise barrier adjacent to the major roadways, which could cause a significant impact without mitigation. community park may begin just north of the anticipated driveway at the southeast of the park. Proposetl residential units to the south of the high school stadium would be affectetl by activities at the stadium. Exterior noise levels at receivers 2 A site design for the multi-family residential area is not available at this time. through 8 in Village 2 are projected to exceed 65 CNEL. This could cause Mitigation of any eztedor use areas could also be achievetl through the site a significant impact without mitigation. design by placing the exterior use areas on the sides of the building opposite the major project roadways (Olympic Parkway, Heritage Road and La Media Active uses in the community park are not expected to exceed noise Road). This would ensure that these areas are adequately shielded from ordinance standards for Village Two to the north. However, noise levels roadway noise. may exceetl standards for the residential zone to the south of the park. This could cause a significant impact without mitigation. . pdor to issuance of the rough grading permit noise barriers shall be shown on wall and fence plans to the satisfaction of the Director of Building and Traffic noise levels are not projected to exceed 75 CNEL in industrial use Planning and the Environmental Review Coordinator. areas. Noise levels produced on the industrial properties have the potential to affect adjacent residential uses and adjacent wildlife. Depending on the specifics of the industrial uses, this may be a significant impact. Page 1-29 TABLE 1-2 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION (continued) Impad Mitigation Measures Signifcance after Mifigation Noise (coot ) 5.12-2 Prior to approval of building permits for single-family areas where second floor exterior noise levels exceed 65 CNEL, an acoustical analysis shall be pertormed ensuring that interior noise levels due to exterior sources will be at or below 45 CNEL. Building plans will be available during tlesign review and will permit the accurate calculation of transmission loss for habitable rooms. (lots 1 through 4, 6, 7 and 9lhrough 17 in R-6; lots 103, 104, 114, 115, and 129 in R5; lots 11, 12 [or 25-C it this lot will have a builtling] and 34 in R-25; and lots 3, 5 through 9, 11, 12, 14, 19 and 20 in R-4.) For these lots, it may be necessary for the windows to be able to remain closed to ensure that interior noise levels meet the interior standard of 45 CNEL. Consequently, the design for these units may need to include a ventilation or air conditioning system to provide a habitable interior environment with the windows closed based on the results of the interior acoustical analysis. A J CD 5.12-3 As stated in Title 24 of the State Building Code, prior to approval of design review permits for multi-family areas where frst and/or second floor exterior noise levels exceed 60 CNEL, an acoustical analysis shall be performed ensuring that interior noise levels due to ezteror sources will be below 45 CNEL. Building plans will be available during design review and will permit the accurate calculation of transmission loss for habitable rooms. (POdions of Neighborhoods R-14, MU-3, R-30, R-13, and R-12.) Far these areas, it may be necessary for the windows fo be able to remain closed to ensure that interior noise levels meet the interior standard of 45 CNEL. Consequently, the design for buildings in these areas may need to incude a ventilation or air conditioning system to provide a habitable interior environment with the windows Gosed based on the results of the interior acoustical analysis. Page 1-30 TABLE 1.2 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION (continued) J I Public Services/Utilities: Potable Water ~ The proposed SPA Plan would result in an incremental increase in water ~ consumption and place adtlitional demands on water storage and pumping facilities. The impact to water storage and pumping facilities would be signifcanf if construction of facilities tloes not coincide with the anticipated growth associated with the SPA Plan. However, the incmase in demand for water would not have a signifcant impact on the ability of OWD to provide service to the proposed project. The WSAV Report indicated that the increase in water demand is consistent with the projected water demand included in the OWD 2000 UWMP and the WRMP. The same fnding can also be made under the OWD 2005 UWMP. The WSAV Report relied on water supply forecasts based on the projected potable water demands supplied with imported water received from SDCWA. However, as discussed above, the SDCWA relies in part on the IID water transfer and other agreements that are being challenged in court. As a result, the assumption that the IID water transfer and other agreements will be available is questionable due to litigation uncertainty, and it is possible that the itlentified water supplies may nol6e available as anticipated, despite the urban water management planning contlucted by MWD, SDCWA, and OWD. If the litigation were to invalidate identifed and available water supplies, a significant water supply impact would result. As discussed above, noise levels at receivers 2 through 8 (see Figure 5.12-3) are projected to exceed the applicable noise ordinance standard. The following mitigation measure would reduce ground-floor noise levels to below a level of significance. 5.12-4 Prior to the issuance of any building permit for Lots 21, 22, 27, 28, 29, 30, antl 53 through 57 (see Figure 5.12-3), the applicant(s) shall cons[rudfour-foot-high barriers along the northern property line of the affected lots as shown on~ Figure 5.72-5. Community Park Noise 5.72-5 Prior to approval of a precise grading plan, an acoustical analysis shall be performed ensuring that noise levels do not exceed noise ordinance standards. Industrial Noise 5.12-6 Prior to the issuance of a building permit for an intlustrial use on lots adjacent to residential uses, or adjacent to the Wolf Canyon wildlife area a noise analysis shall be completed demonstrating that the proposed use will not exceed the noise Prior to the approval of the frst final map, a anal subarea nnaster rlan taHrwrt shall be required for the project. The SAMP shall include the following: • Existing pipeline locafions, size, and capacity • The proposed points of connection and system • The estimated water demands and/or sewer flow calculated • Governing fire department's fire flow requirements (flow rate, duration, hydrant spacing, etc) • Agency's Master Plan • Agency's planning criteria (see Sections 4.1 through 4.3 of the Water Agencies' Standards) • Water quality maintenance Size of system and number of Icts to be served Water facilities improvements shall be financed or installed on-site and off-site in accordance with the SAMP. 5.13.1-2 Prior to the approval of the first final map, the applicant(s) shall secure and agree with the Otay Water District to censtmct all potable water facilities (on-site and off- site) required to serve the project. These water facilities improvements shall be !nanced or installed on-site and off-site in accordance with the fees and phasing in the approved Public Facilities Finance Plans for the SPA Plan. than Pagel-31 TABLE 1.2 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION (continued) The proposed project would result in an incremental increase in the use of 5.13.2-1 Prior to the approval of the first Final map, a final Subarea Master Tian t~,vmr/ recyGed water and place additional demands on water storage and shall be required for the project. The SAMP shall inGude the following: pumping facilities. The increase in use of recyGed water has been planned Existing pipeline locations, size, and capacity for by OWD antl will not have a significant impact. However, the impact to The proposed points of connection and system recyGed water storage and distribution facilities would be significant if The estimatetl water demands and/or sewer flow calculated constmction of new facilities does not coincide with the project's Governing fire department's ire flow requirements (flow rate, duration, anticipated growth. hydrant spacing, etc.) • Agency's Master Plan • Agency's planning criteria (see Sections 4.1 through 4.3 of the Water Agencies' Slandartls) • Water quality maintenance • Size of system antl number of lots to be served Water facilities improvements shall be financed or installed on-site and off-site in accordance with the SAMP. W J 5.13.2-2 RecyGed water facility improvements shall be financed or installed on-and off-site in accordance with the fees and phasing in the approved PFFP for the Villages Twe, Three, and a portion of Four SPA Plan. Development of the proposed SPA Plan and the Composite TM would 5.13.3-1 Sewer facility improvements shall be fnancetl or installed on-and oft-site in result in an increase in sewage generation. There is suffiGenl capacity in accordance with the fees and phasing in [he approved Public Facilities Financing the Poggi Canyon and Wolf Canyon/Salt Creek Interceptors to Plan. accommodate the proposed SPA Plan. The Poggi Canyon Interceptor would adequately serve the Village Four community park on an interim 5.13.3-2 Prior to the recortlation of the frst Final Map or grading permit that creates any basis parcel locatetl within the Wolf Canyon/Salt Creek Sewer Basin, the City Engineer . shall 6e satisfied that the connections to the gravity sewer system from the The southerly portion of Village Two and Village Three cannot be southern portion of Village Two have been designed and secured to convey Flow developed until completion of the Heritage Road sewer line antl to Heritage Road and southerly fo the Salt Creek Interceptor. connection to the Wolf Canyon/Salt Creek Interceptor. 5.13.3-3 In order to ensure the timely construction of the Heritage Roatl regional facility, prior fo the frst final map that creates any parcel located within the Wolf Canyon/Salt Creek Sewer Basin, the necessary right-of-way for constructing full street improvements within the SPA Plan boundary shall be granted to the City. No signifcant integrated waste management impacts were identifed for No mdiganon measures are regwrec. the development of the proposed SPA Plan antl the Composite TM . Page 1-32 TABLE 1-2 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION (continued) after Development of the proposed SPA Plan antl the Composite I M would result in a significant impact to law enforcement because of the predicted increase in calls for service and the atldilional travel lime required to answer these calls. Prior to the approval o(each builtlint Facilities Development Impact Fees Financing Plan describes public foci equivalent dwelling units by develop public facilities fees at the rate in eft 5.13.5-2 The City shall continue to monitor Police Department responses to emergency calls and report the results to the Growth Management Oversight Committee on an annual basis. emit, the applicant(s) snap pay ruouc ~DIF). The proposed Public Facilities s fees for police services based on nt phase. The applicant(s) shall pay the al the time building permits are issued. Less than The Chula Vista Fire Department does not currently meet the threshold 5.13.6-1 Prior to the approval of each building permit, the applicant(s) shall pay Public Less than signlncant standard for response time for the City, including the Otay Ranch Facilities Development Impact Fee (PFDIF) at the rate in effect at the time of community. However, as population growth in the service area warrants, building permit issuance. fire stations would be constructed within Village Nine of the Otay Valley parcel and within Village Thirteen of the Proctor Valley parcel. These 5.13.6-2 The City shall continue to monitor Fire Department responses 1o emergency fre stations would help ensure adequate service within the requirements of and medical calls and report the results to the Growth Management Oversight ~ the GMOC ihresholtl stantlards. Impacts to fire and emergency medical Committee on an annual basis. ? services would be significant if construction of these facilities does not co- incitle with the project's anticipated population growth and increased ~ N demand for services. Public Services/Utilities: Schools Project implementation would result in a signifcant impact to schools unless construction of facilities coincitles with student generation and associated service demands. ProVl$lon Of SChoo taClll[IES IS the respons Dlllty Or the school als[ncl Wnen aaamonal demand warrants. Government Code 65995(b) provides [hat the statutory fees are the exctusive means of considering as well as mitigating for school impacts. It does not just limit the mitigation that may be required, but also limits the scope of review and the findings to be adopted for school impacts. Once the statutory fee is imposed, the impact will be mitigated because of the provision that the statutory fees constitute full and complete mitigation [Government Code §65995(b)]. Therefore, the fallowing measure would reduce the impact to schools to below a level of signifcance for the proposed SPA Plan and the Composite TM: 5.13.7-1 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant(s) shall pay all required school mitigation fees or enter into an agreement to help finance the needed facilities and services for the Chula Vista Elementary School District to the satisfaction of the School District. 5.13.7-2 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant(s) shall pay all required school mitigation fees or enter into an agreement [o help finance the needed facilities and services for the Sweetwater Union High School District to the satisfaction of [he School Distdct. Pagel-33 TABLE 1.2 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION (continued) Impact Mitigation Measures Signifcance after Mitigation Public ServiceslUlilities~ Library Service A significant impact would result form the development of the proposetl 5.13.8-1 Prior to approval of each building permit, the applicant(s) shall pay Public Less than significant SPA Plan antl the Composite TM if construction of new library facilities Facilities Development Impact Fees. Prior to the issuance of builtling permits, and provision of additional documents does not coincide with project Applicants shall pay requiretl Public Facility Development Impact fees at the rate implementation and associated population growth, in effect at the time of permit issuance. Project implementation of the proposed SPA Plan and the Composite TM would generate increased tlemand for parks and recreation facilities. A significant impact could result if dedication of parkland and construction of new facilities does not coincitle with project implementation and project population growth. The extent of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil beneath the farmer UST on Vllage Two have been adequately assessed and excavated. Soil samples collected from the bottom and sidewalls of the excavation do not exhibit ~ TPHg/iPHd concentrations at or above the laboratory detection limits and ~ are not considered a risk to public safety or the environment. The Phase I I ESA conducted for Village Three concluded that there is a potential for ~ a ricul[urall develo etl ortions of the sub ect ro ert to be im acted b W 9 Y P P 1 P P Y P Y residual agricultural, including sail augmenting and chemicals. Elevated levels of organochlorine pesticides were present in the soils at the Village Fcur site. Fifteen composite soil samples taken from the Village Four Community Park Site exhibited concentrations of toxaphene exceeding one-quarter of the residential PRGs. Concentrations of OCPS exceeding residential PRGs are generally limited to the upper two feet of soil. The concentrations of the pesticides in the soils at the Village Four Community Park Site would be considered a significant risk to public safety and mitigation would be required. 5.13.9-1 Prior to the approval or the nrst final map, me appucangs/ soon cemicare neighborhood and community parks. Prior to approval of the final map, odor projects not requiring a final map, prior to builtling permit, the applicant(s) shall pay park development fees; and poor to building permit the applicant(s) shall pay recreation development impact tees in accordance with the tees and phasing approved in the Public Facilities Financing Plan for the SPA Plan. If soil is to be exported from the site during proposetl grading antl other wnstruction activities, it should be charactedzed prior to proposed offsite use or disposal antl handled in accordance with applicable environmental laws and regulations. In addition, contractors performing proposed grading and construction activities should employ adequate dust control measures to minimize exposure to soil and dust at the site. 5.14-2 If soil exhibiting hydrocarbon staining and/or odors are encountered al the site during grading and/or construction, the soil should be evaluatetl by a qualified professional (such as a professional engineer, registered geologist, or registeretl environmental assessor experienced in hazartlous waste evaluations) and handled in accordance with applicable environmental laws and regulations. The nearest airport is Brown Field, which is approximately three miles to the south of the project site. The site does not lie on either the runway approach or the departure paths for this airport. Operation of Brown Field Airport would not result in any significant impacts to the proposed project. The proposed SPA Plan includes a FPP as required by Article 86 of the California Fire Cotle, which requires a FPP for all new development in the Urban Wildlantl Intertace, including the proposed SPA Plan area adjacent to Wolf Canyon. Implementation of the FPP will reduce wildf re potential and therefore no signifcant impact would occur Pagel-34 ATTACHMENT 4 Disclosure Statement 14-84 "'"" Planning & Building Department C17Y OF C}{>,~yf$[q Planning Division I Bevelopmenz Processing Pursuant to Council Policy 101-01, prior to any action upon matters fhat will require discretionary action by the Council, Planning Commission and ali other official bodies of the City, a statement of disclosure of certain ownership or financial interests, payments, or campaign contributions for a City of Chula Vista election must be filed. The following information must be disclosed: 1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the property that is the subject of the application or the contract, e.g., owner, applicant, contractor, subcontractor, material supplier. Village II of Otav HB Sub Sunranch Capital Partners LLC Shawn Baldwin Steve Baldwin Otav Ranch II Sun6/8 LLC Ron Baldwin. & AI Baldwin 2. If any person* identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of a!1 individuals with a $2000 investment in the business (corporation/partnership) entity. AI Baldwin Shawn Baldwin Steve Baldwin RANDALL G BONE Ron Baldwin 3. If any person* identified pursuant to (1) above is anon-profit organization or trust, list the names of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust. N/A 4. Please identify every person, including any agents, employees, consultants, or independent contractors you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter. Stephen Haase (B&S, LLC! Alisa Vialoando (H&Al Zach Adams IB&S. LLC) Dave Hammar (H&A) Dan Rehm (H8A) 5. Has any person* associated with this contract had any financial dealings with an official** of the City of Chula Vista as it relates to this contract within the past 12 months. Yes ~ No ~_ If Yes, briefly describe the nature of the financial interest the official`* may have in this contract. 6. Have you made a contribution of more than $250 within the past twelve (12j months to a current member of the Chula Vista City Council? No ®Yes ~ If yes, which Council Member? 276 Fourth Avenue I chwa vista I c~ii4m$ 9 91910 I (619) 691-5101 City of Chula Yista Disclosure Statement -Page 2 xx Have you provided more than $340 (or an item of equivalent value) to an official"* of the City of Chula Vista in the past twelve (12) months? (This includes being a source of income, money to retire a legal debt, gift, loan, etc.) Yes [Z_ No If Yes, which official** and what was the nature of item provided? Date: ~-/ S~ ~ ~ 1 Signature of ContractorlApplicant BALDWIN & SONS, LLC 4V. cu 4Tra RAT Tit77'~i [rP Print or type name of ContractorlApplicant Person is defined as: any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, any other county, city, municipalfty, district, or other political subdivision, -or any other group or combination acting as a unit. Official includes, but is not limited to: Mayor, Council member, Planning Commissioner, Member of a board, commission, or committee of the City, employee, or staff members. 276 Fourth Avenue 1 Chula Vista I C~II~TP'~M 91910 1 (619) 691-5101 L ~-hl g ;uawyae~d WIIOYtl'J NPo3INI-IJ33N5 mL ~ ivti7 dow autr~ ~ e 1.~r Ls SNY130/SNOIl~35133tl{5-iJ33NS 133FI53LIL ~ tl33{IS X3ONI133HS u/an, q sw!daawuvbls!,'m AN LN SK[Y ""'b dlYn 's VS T' L /i +"~ OEY B56 (R6) , t!Z6 vJ 'N !0 M1K 133YI5 5?MY [O[6 Jv~'W3!4 NVS"bL YibM'SVW H33NI°JN37Ul1O rW~ I l Rs~(~+ CII (6, 9) E~093!0 Av5 d!IWN,de'T lyp, ttd v A •! pvll!n H3O1A1O8nS/H3NMO ,!r.l z rY„!A xnmArlu ~„ w!. Dxm~l. x! ~!ro~ ~ m ~NipoN~,,, IvP r aaxra,v eJf aa,rasl s(wla+aw! I>,d, .. anemo,3l wimu 9ulrrewa~! a, NA°. w ,me qlb,.,~ 91w.n f s•I.orP,3 311, 3,J N! mmv r! Nn v~3a'~s ai as 1. r~anpir a a'~n~ su'~°+vn s»wu"~'~qua'a ~r !~>d lrcnlulm,rr rerre nruaJ a I1Ym uv Y. mo,b3v 3rf wn 3r'.!aoJ m~ ~ svrlxissr i NixYaiw Ab aa.as'e .Irma w-d!.wv u,-mn m, H, w of xvs "R ,n, , INmI„ b~.~, A Abp( Zr __ ~~L 6, ISM1MY 031N 63IYMW/Nl ,4'VD A M!IM3103, AMN!NI-6N-IC inrovlnr wv qsw w Nr av YUwur+, 3s n,. sA!urm.Nb"r"irAS"mYAN' s'lm vmi>als INwmkv an Arxvul "ac N! qurou. mr of ups an Aumwluusr gblN ,.ale bras wr pp r~eo ~ii"a sa»lrre en.ob>. of 3v!I m ,NVN! w wlY ss3v+'lwn wln smemnl3, a3wAw!q olvi s3vai sw„md q snm!~ .mra,.lms A A. "_. w me oamJa a.m sdm mmrf'az A I~~%;99 M3~ TM Ig3Dll ®5 ( (~utl U!NJ !I'!N'! 33MU!~ 5! IJTkd b,ll,'[Z m,f n! INTI ndD 631!nXE I JVJMA V[Sln YTO AAI,J ]u /P T'nbipY JMyJSgJ tlllnYllRS 011JT ' ISA Im'!fro!q~!JI N'„dn fiNlfJ mlW lire AA~T STW D)YY GM1 Ya!OYY, 9L I II3LUTN3] 3LL AF Abv5Y3J?u N1,16]ISI 3b3Y s Yne35 AB YIS!n PiIYO A 4,J w 0l 0I M'b' H OI llOl Tq'IWl IWf M'K Ttl 3J!(tl v Sv pSl Y lM5 aM s!N, W IAUI 3tl„ -B 'M ayNIS ,J 31I N,. 3F~la¢DV xYi pTYIR'I AOa Slmgµ b!f'CZ YIYO P AI!J w 9 5®YQ'/,(.`D!IYWISW PY IO,SAw 0.v SM!IYIq ®haN1S A IlX[9AJ iVn TM!]Y! Y;v pJ3!O N5 JIl 'M ],T { Mf 9AllYJ!f I.J3fi anuns w n!Y 3>(renv. N. 3m 39 mma AY.-nlrolb Jr-ev w NI m ll. -vs,.. r»o A Am w A lae, -a 3am,aa'ry Ae a>.xi.. sr) eul "a 3snN,aa w,. 3J.+aa-J. xl mrwlnm a »m' alrmm !z ro!sATnll!A Nrvb AvIO 3LL Itl/PV 'T1N b/JSO.YI VISIn VM1[, A AI!J 3Y xl lY LIgmJV NI A -IMS.MILWy 3qE "ZZ 91M,!' rev Af lu,lb+ex sal ws eawv+v w Ae araur muYrv on arl 3r: N1 S~Ilnf ar srooNS .ron ,3sus mTbuY Jlrlvu rnr ~lms'6 Aa'vSSD3:5Y m],npY SIN36Y] 0.Y Oi1nYp9l p lTl6 S3,I!IIIN 'i n YYW A/I,J 3Y A [BB, m vn sxl baw 3arN,aa ,. xvYam»Y N, o!.e a +ma zvsmo sal ,3as '( 'av1+mL,.>rl 1.X13 al! ra aa!roa ab. uesuw .NAmJr wn s,q!N woro mil Yl® s+uYN A oD,.wa a ems 3a,A,.a 9 alYbwo Iwc s3ii1 ~J'n a rn!x!N ,b sn w,m d3YE -s~D 9(b,N .,.a A uIJ v m~ a. ®,.~, A NA N>+=,„Y,,.„~'b ,~bY~=D1nNE,~W~ :,!J 31, A6 ®'NqY sv ¢3]!AMY ro,"M6 Sly Y]A3JM'1YM 'lYlRln /O,:,e,®6 w A vN>.'a!rox w A q,sx "vna av,mm a+.N.rrmr! A ~!w (. Iwb w sn!nffi nowv+v 31l As lYNtlnn Nl!v1~O~I ]~SS96A~ d'L YY RU:s .MIl1Ml _0 sQNI_ Jrf!J]6 . ban Avow Al9~l ~!Q ~.e av~a>:!.~~Twr ~ of ws~is avn n ..low 'N.a vaa,n rsu r Auo w of sen umsas drn slw z n. 9~:z/vlm bbd Jr/ro o~r amo- msm mlmdn' , !Jr c .vv Nn os) J./m z~!u!vn uamw 'o n+a Nao i MuNA!sY' nnmf 3w,z al u., ~ 6 IrmrA al om H-mu, 'b (99,1/YDb IJ!W S!O Jd Ol ,N3Vlrv YL),3VLE ~911gZ~ -( (90,IV1tlY 19!tltb!O Jd azL) ,9/(5 +J:IIpL JN,IS,G '9 (J",. Krvvtl AvIO tl31) nl M!IV!b,5_9 M'V lvtlNTi OEMkY/.yl,y5,p 'S lo-z,(-.., ,~.., WN.bgs~. ,AV~ qA ro3luHO!N 0! 'pvdi xbJ L ': l!m, 3L:!5 B9) m Ldl63~1'~W A yHrry AIOI ( 9lltl,~s!x3mA 6'Ary AtO: " S31ON 7VH3N3'J - N~Y»3rs ~~A~!~~, .13~r A' J!GJa't30F tYJ ~ sal_rucew ar~iae a,x:S ~SVVv 6'L~IIS TL W ~SAI lbM1WlO Y!5!n YYYO NIYYYY rvG b ' ` . 1J!tl15,0 Y1 % 4YI0 v(b!n YT9 A 4!] tyE z: o:.e zua: Anwe armr! - MN' YEOLy.1 Y/IIMlOI LIWO ' s3unun onand 'R315AS M„wJ!1N" Q.Y J!tY JIV A gI.W!%3 T'J „N Y.. v qY~ ~L >„ - - ~~ NJ db 9JVd5 .Yl,Md „,.N~D~ s,o,„q,,,rowo,w,aa!,!m~~Am~ ~,s~..,~,~P„ ,~a!roa~,,~,~~!s~! o 3,,,Y. N!.~ =~3,a ~. s,o, DYdJ qn ( ,AAM]v N. aw!aYls; ~ »,, ~!3a ~N~ sa3nroM lo3road q ~.D AY.PIg N!, LlYY3 33 OI OMIN! IW s, 53IdN/vK 13V A MI1VN!W 'Z ( Wf N]NIT3 4,> w A 3Y3aVb] 3„ w!Y LLyJ1Y.. }Y AB 635!"Pli3 E T!Y SJW,S3Y H!YT' J, (~ 'AYE N3O J,Nb' A avgiN~w ~IVNTUMAA3~s) y,NN ~U ~ 35,YhN10 Ntl6 F9NI . gv~35 biYA MY Tn!N,n s! SWYVO,T' A JN, Yvl W >/,tlAYN ]A!LUENIJ 'I 01 f3llilN, 1M ® yBVH aNT3Y3 YB,3 AMWIta "N S31ON 0X11107 -- "" `N"DY' d-p Iq!1 i3ws (ol a>emw roNar w ou.d NJba of v q!n.,v13 aJr3bs ms1NU IS~ a ia s H same' nn,yJ Azws!roemL a,,mw,vN sY (mz ',z r ~ a+r q ns!. rrw A u IJ w v anNno saxxrc Amlrq w, l.aar3 N. .r Na! J~' N. w..rrz~ nrx s, al, _ _ ro,~a ~~i ° " „vY a,!N,.l3n ,orel~ ®.A DIS rr,Nl~ o~,er,q~6Y~a,.,,,!drv,~A3 ~Y3 „ -.d N~,! ~ y_____.-.~..: r.9aN!.q N,.o(s , d-,N,( of ,~ a IN,(~Y3 - 3D.,,o-«~ ~, ,N3WY3~ r ~ 4p(, Z9]-pTX 3l!35Y 0q S, tlFNW MJ,WJ3l3 i~ N'3 0 nK 0l 63/NVtl 43S]] Un' SS3YY:, 531,1, ll! J, EY !Of lV3WO Nv -- N,ro yy vY ¢31/YU3b Y v ,b.'".df°NaN 01 A WN3 0 IMW.N D SI S SMJ,63Y N M GI M!'bC;o-mv -v/ 31,15v tV[H '6 YISIA YIYO AY,J 3fl 01 rtllMb9 53aHN A, II TYN39 W, N3IEV3 Nv N3 ~ - - (~.B) N m YLVx 0! 0 yvn.J Ad M3 AIS 0, [x1~.'v ] ~} WfYn3[I µMN'yyE R ZZ 3JYbvJ :d'I N3 ,]b1001 stbfiN-oxd wTJSv 3!Y' M YIS A rryp A:., J 3LL N o3IMXi 9s0.&Y 3lrt! vltl bV 1N3IyYJ m'- 9 tt3, r ~ ~~ I •.B~ x IN }pas (J ) gY91 a,YA,KWf nT!u,n ~ ~3 Y ~" q~lvn 313 :3}41c (13L1 IW (bZb((tr9NY 'd ]l,f S OOC2 n rv' i1 YYYO D A!!J 3v N m,mAS SEhbN C31fA 3n]bONI q]! lNT3v3 W - S! M1311 ~ 3JVYJ AlN6'3, _ (xM, Z) 3aJ3 1 ~ J # U m 3 'tl3ifH Sn95W'1 __ L- vi- Y M vµv SsIDV qY Alll!1N lrt'JCD eAJ W,IYJ!OA MI3 e3iA w INT3s/3 On - II TL, Co % V 7 ~ - MI!G xpY9 J 3"s/MYf a3ba5 t019VL [N, MA' O! :I3Z3s 3 ] lOl 3JYe5 N3A ro]'iuBtl!3f B-LI 6V ] . q 10-L661 ' W 1N3rtVd sY [661 '( btlm eq OJi,0,rv51J :lNm all O! pvrLy 1Y ¢31 31 WYl 3l, ,LL,Y 4:NiaW SI tildN Pv D`nS!/W NA+Y11Of IN311SY3 xr -d! H1, ~ LZ'$O (ol DvD pfj (,33J1 NIOI. 10] TnIN!n ,!OL'bKW,w'MAw•'JryJ Tl,(WVJ!q A9 ~l'C-(-I1bWtl 31,l Aym~n,'(N'd6vW ~~a !D 56 (133f)wdAlol N In .a, lvl,NA,S]Y s9 „„I,N. AJ„'..,, ~ S31ON 1N3W3SV3 © r ( , q!,.,,,3 NYd a~'A , (i r~ ` 3lrl idl ~ 5) vAN tOl Lgy.v 91Y BL M tl.YPYJJE' AaNm pJ3!N nYS 3U lJ D!1A3LL Nf mllf m M A 31Y1b ~ a ' aM + 3 AMMC9 UMFBO,T' q 'W3,O Nvs A A/Na 'Y YYb A l IJ w N d n A M!IMV Orv S s!A Y MUUm 0.Al W,IS,x3 n.nl. w.Yb mo 'so-m w nro, nn..ro A a Im A ---- 1tl19•"'^0151"!~ sis izis sauraxras~xdonnaa NOI1dIHOS3O7HJ37 ON3J37 SNOI1 V7nJ3H1O1FLLSlOOd dvwNOUVOO7 viNao~nvo 'vlsin v~nHO ~o Hilo q~-2i "Z 3~d~~1~ H~Nd2i Jl`dl0 ZO- ~ L ln~ d`dW 3nIlb1N31 dVW AlINIOIA N i ,n ~~~rs 0 i ass ss.., +•• _ ~a .n.•... ~..a.>u ~ ~ I ~ zx ~ ~ 6LWE PRIME ~-._\\ - ~ ~" OLYMPIC PARKWAY # ~~ ~ , m \~ _J\ ,.~., .~„ ~.s.~..~ E..,.,. a~ ~~~~ ~ OExO~ES I ~ uN IO 51 uns~uuv AWE o SECONMRYVILLAGE ENTRY OO SANTA VICTORIA ROAD itxowxexc~nFxwo roxaTeawcx MHOI `s~~~..m„.. a ro,v~2 a, 9ii .~..,.,,~,,.m ..~ a~ i~ ~~ o mR o~«..g ~.,~a.., • on+o¢s zs u~mvvu ro s. r wnnuvu sWc SECGNOARYVIIlAGE FNRiY © SANTA VICTORIA ROAD PMW 0.Y~61L PMkWAY ro my M2T CF I FIYL~ XOAO) T o~..g ~. v. ,.,, r oeaorrs uHiriwvw~ro s. w.~wo~ xWC~ PARKWAY RESIDENTIAL TIP. LOT DRAINAGE DETAIL 2i:uJ TYP. DRAINAGE SWALE TYP. RETAINING WALL SECTION rMr IENGTNOR iESs MODIFlED CUL•D6SAC ~,.,.. ~\ ~'~..a ~° UPPER PROP. LINE SHELF FOUNDING u u~x .sum. W. oK - i.+: °a« a TYP. NEIGHBORHOOD TRAIL SECTION //~/~ /~` «M.~..~.~ .~~, *a.o,~~ u'w.~;,,~: m ~°;'w.,,w~w AWE O B LANE PRIME HER?AGE ROAD '_ .. '~~~ ~ 11 yxy ~~A~~ ~! ~M roor ~~~ ~~~ ~ t'. ~` _ gq ~ ~~ ~~ ,; ,. _: ~ ~m ~~ [ SUBpMgpNBWNOMY-' ~y v 1tl mx w...v v ~ N<~~ ' a / ~ i a_ " ~~ "~^: ~ wo~;~m OS-176 ,~'-,. ~t ~~~.' .~. ~' \ w,~ ~ z ~~ ~ ~~u ~ ,oa o oa .ro 2 goo ~ la 'V ! ~' ~ d-- ~ ~ W \~~~ q~ / . \ -' ~' 241 z ~- , , / 0 a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~t, _ -d \ _s . ~ .~ 4b ~ ~~~; „a.~ ~ ° _, ° - 4 ~~, /~•-- APN 644-312 ~4 _. .' ~,-. ~ _ `V. ~v ~~ , F;~P '/ MAP IVO. 753u0 ,.' .. j ~~ 4 -. ,~ ,, " <" s ,`~~. .\~~ as. ~~ Q~ ~ - _ ~ - 9o.r.~aa~ JOT 27 / ~i' - ~ e , AA ~ - ~ qs ,~ • ~' ~ ~ Q ~ ~ @~ / +/ f /a ~ ~ s~ j w~•'.,ce PROP 54 GFNEAAL,UI61iY ~~ ~/ O e. ' s y 1 ~ ~, ti ~ , ~~/o // ANOAOOE%PAiEMENT / a r \ \ • 'A V 'SAC. ~x a a ®~:rf v ~ 1 ~~VA % fir.-" ./~,~> ~~ i ~/ i s / ~ A ,v ~ A ~ 'q VA _ - ~ e+~~j rnor. as cv~Ewu ~/!\ ~ `~Osa~ y,,~ v O, v „ t~ V ' / f,/ unrtvu~o nCCess /r i-/ A .x~ ,A ~P& ; ~' ~ m V - 3 N~ q ' ~ ~ " / / / E0.4EMEIR ~ A > ~\ 3 a ~, _p ~ ~ b ~~ Q ~ ~~~\ Z KF5^.F a^ ~\, /,*_i~ ~~ ~ PnoPaeawEna ~ .m ~ y ~ ;' ®~ - ~n~ \ ~ °' ~. 4 ~{ v ~a gym. .~ r' a unutruro ~ _ _ 0 ~ ~ \ \\ •\ ~ ° j i~'>s EASEMENT ` tI s V ~ o ~.~.. rA _ ,. o ~ ~ ~ ~ ....~ ... ~.___ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~1LVP ' ~..r ___. ._. ~. .- I _ _ ~v \ os ._ ~_ ~'\°~~ Poor svPUeucMnurv ~ ~ _____ I'. I O ,~~ ~1~`~ © a.~rco ~_<.'.~~°' //,\/) . `\ • EASEMENT _. - .. ._.__. va+ac-- _ ~.--- ! ~_ o i,` ` x® vM1ev '\\ 'a ~ _ ~ ~ ~,t~ ~ 17 OS 1 6 ~~ e r _ ~~~~~~ © ~ ~ ~, r ~_ ~~ z~= ;_ ~-* ~_ ~- sANTAVtcronu noAOOE~nEO - _~ _~ ~ •~ ' ~ I -~ „~ r, - v -.-- _ fOX OEON)ATpN ON MAPfS~bp 3~ I ~/_ ~ s APN 5~#-3f2-04 „ .,~mA> ~` . ~ . ~ .~ ~ '_.~ _. _ _ --~ _ ~ ~. !vL'I P ND, 1 X350 f -~'>~. '~#F°m -s- 'S- _ _~ ~= ~~.jA r . ' -' APN 54~ 312-03 1 LO7~ 29 _ ~ '~' ~ = _ ~ '- "ar _ ^~ bM~2 NO 1~35Q ~~~ --- -' -' - NOl'E: a' ~' _ ,LG7 J3 ,_. -p' LOTTING AND GRADING.. - _~ .:-` t s'~`•E . _ _ j PER APPROVED TM QB-OS l- ~ . ~ v o ~. ' - - ~ 1 ~ i~. "si' ~~i ~~ ` ~1 % ~~ .. 1. Y ~ `, y a ~~ I ~~~~VV I Y Y~~i U _ ~ ~~ ~ <ma . ~ _._ ~ _ ~~~~ ~~ '. ~ '-. .~~ PNEPAPED BV: SHEET ~ _ _ .- -.~ _ ~s~ TENTATIVE MAP 3 _ ~ ~ ~ -.. .~ _ .. ~_..., fiASSOCfATES CVT 11-02 DF ~ - ...< ~~..,_ 4 C{r DF CHUlAV14A, CAIJFORNIA /y-~ D O .`/ i._ i ~ i' ~~> ~ ,yA I ~ew. - ti~ m i 'r".: y* ~~, g~ o- ~~ L e" ¶$ ~ //{/ a ~," ,o 6p, / ~o..`".`N...SUBOMSION BOUNOA!!Y ,y c 1 a.a - . $ w"s+. ». ~~ ~~ ~~, C 1 ~ ,. ;' ~ ~~ Y .~ ,y' m ~ ---- - = s ti e~E,-,ad .ae ~ _, ;- / s - i e ~> a ~n nr ~~~~ O 71 ~' \ O rucE v ~s-. _ q i. \ ,, t~ - bU ~v ~ ~;wT > u e b ... / ~ r v y v. - n ANN 5 ~~ 31 J D1 ~~ ~ ~~ 8~ ~>v ~ ~ ~` >~ ~ ~ ` ~ . ~ . ~ ~r ~vJG. 7~J.TT ~ ;`'~ ~l" e0 ~ ~v _ m \ \ a - ~J i7 r , ~~ ~ a w ~ ~~ Q' ,, ~ .~-~ ° Y . \ ~- e0rc , . a ~ ~ ~ oar-snerexm8aonroon~oE ,, _ .M ~ ,_ - ~o. ~~ q ,~,~. ~~ ~ _ ON LOT 2TT0 BE OH[NNEO rNOn Y ~ ~ >~ ~- - ~ ~/~ _',•.• TOOMOINO PBIMR b i a~P.~ ,• a-•-~~ .~ ~\ ~l~ ~'\ - ~ ' ° > i r~"~v ~ ' "w < ~". ,~ J~ ~ f' .. .>~ - ~ , i ~ ~ \ a ,. ~', - ~ '. '~~' ~ - be _ ~-~ ~ ' .~ ~ _ f . av~ - ., > > 1~§ ~ ~ ~ " ta~: ~ i ~ - _ _ - i - O A~ ~ 4 vNUV ~~ ~ ,.~ ~ ~,. _ ~J _ ~ 4 >>nwo ~ °~ ~ s .,. -- - ~ ~°OS ~ b ~ _ , .. ~. _ _ a , ~ _ - --- ~ ~p _ F . 4 ~ \+. o. Mae ~ ~- - =b ~a~~14 ~ ® ~ ~ a ~~. u n b o e c ~ ''-'a ~ V' 1- v ~_; ~~ `~__ _ _ -_ - ~1 ~ 1 ?l. .1 h ~I l TJq~ - - _~ " ~" "~~ >I ~~Y 64 1 ' ~ 7 03 ~~ F ~ N4] P ~J~J ~ "J d - _- ~ ~ ~ s*°E - MI rV0 'T3TJ ~ 1 ~~~~ ITT < m~~ ;. ,- I MmE: ~' _. LOT ~~ .~; ~1 ,~ ~J aH w~r~roaE Oe~ruwm roman `~a~_ ~;; ... y'~ ~s~~~~• To annwxa rrrvert _, I ~~ 4 - -F- 11 ~ / I ~' 1 ~1 -~ 1,/ ~1 / TENTATIVE MAP CVT 11-03 ~-~ N NCINITY MAP LEGEND 9mivrs~w ~.F. urs+rrc Ian ca.ox Wlaeaa v evw.wr PAO CLEVI+rW e ' FESrRxIrN LOI ~ ~ rnowem R-7 o~N 9=~ LO, os~n re~a9TM.ul aFN mnALO+ rz-e so E r} ~ W.) -Y= afMFNI T' K .di S iFEEI Et£VIiIM _ ;YEF u1~x I9:) YER ~MCR! UEVI+IW ~- fIFE xrzww+ _ Fcr.~wln 1uL +ro fF rut ELLV1+iw Yw 11N19£O 9JY!¢[¢v1-a :5 Sra¢+uwl p--e E1s.?Cx+LrK G o1_ESS $xJUV OMitXrY LOTTING NOTES L1A,K XSBTrA6 W L/HE OS W K,OB]M%OS IS W+,FIPR-0 )0 ro1u h 6mm A muwcv+. nE rr m FEWrg6 „vzs+acu5 ftE1fN+S /5I3ER, YAEP, uIFA. 5 N, MIL OV! S^I¢. ErC.) LL 4 ES lAd l9L0 B. +K RHLO'TT II MvM LMr9gHF W IIC Orly FWrKFF 2. 4l.xG t'al5 KrOBR mJ HV4N~E5 ~S wr ~x+EAd to S EYnn. +r(i FcTIIOE'+~rtL 4-6+rH19E) FPM }iE FrN4 W3. ~ s°.A Lo.s.w wSO.ENS G~x+FNU¢ Lors 9o1N w rrE m+rl+ia W.aa®ino+n rN Olm,llm4 mc~mao .rv 9N.nre .IO LmruL Exrcvsra s acf,Arc wo iaaiGna srsrevs. LEGAL DESCRIPTION m w .ro m m ou. vial ,P.n w aas. or.. FwN vnum i .w xanwuvrw¢.~n-uw rN rrc crly xau.v +. a*Sw e~sa1' co-N s.rF LE uL ~lwn.. ~nsstiile ro Wo ,Wnrs w. i ~~LEn rN Of 61r4£ ~ +K SW O~Em lAN1Y gCphTR M.wY M. IOLS CONDOMINIUM NOTE MSS ~9I NV p' i rypyINIW gAELI NS LEFT ~~x~C+l p' ~ ~6 IK IVIL CAE C~IIE S+vATC~rlWIrl Wl r. EYO ~r~+i~as~cw~rov 1~'~rae .ruomwnvs uxiAeo .mix nE cauclNi~ ~5 9a rOYN (6r IN q-D 11O Y' ~x F-im). ~ ~~~ NJH.i O' Oxfl~!WWi r3 Pueuc urames 6 aA. v,S+. ..,lF orF,F,f, ~, v, rc~noe ~ uo nFC~nrc ~ uaF . G+io-s P1:Atl;q v. - waaF '" vis rn ~xcwY mua olsa~n se~..rere w~a .~sx surcL msmin EASEMENT NOTES ~ ~m a malNiwvY un<,anwr nslwF6 eY arum nnF wewr rO, }Orr O'TEP 1o. 9JW}r56}-u50 © n[Law Geun~ ~ry6SWO ~a.wNr ili 115r99)v5 NrM (Fw.IDO1lmI0 RAIX N)Id9 9 ou..r Gsrwk*n !m xu~r rc ~Nr m~zm m nc c a 2e . orJeasa+. (E-1mcNr m wurN) r ////C~~~\ ~5ri fro r/arroc}uri~~r+ros aw>~ +o - OrJ5699~N v~Fl1 1 - (En4YNr ro aFN1~x) n~F}J - w~ ~rlw ow iwrE vu~gs rv.NOOZ;-0iecan m n o! IFi9FN+1 +0 /OU~rv] M. ZWJ 15 IXPIENI M. } nFx.a-.x GSLwr lw Gro*iu arsl~w row«xrs azxxe ..m ~~ ~ 1m m nE mxrr rc Gx mFm WFw ~r, .9n s ~EISFIFNI +0 RW uJl® i ~1s ~E,Lmw+w sAN lw cEO~Gnu rav tx~a.i ~r Q, scec esr~+an sA..LF.w..reW .L~ss.w 1 W xV r5J50 V(~LI/i lJN~S IS 99N ):.19]fT~ MALVN] ~,1a-wG5FA0+lot99,9. u ` ~,'~~ ~w~;'9~° ~H~rN~i5. 30.X5 - i ncca a Eou~yrs 1+ov ~iw zrw.~t flsf~r. ai.9.v~s aw+~ ro (umcx+,ro.9E W . ~LEw .x smc~~r io xwiN) ~ - KEY MAP W+ IO SGLE C DISTRICT REGULATIONS tsova+Enr9raxoaros srs/srr a wrrtxi. aa. mr.) s.om zem m +921 (sl1 oa ~N F1n0 m rlreo so aL FE< ) o K<S/RD +Y+GIX ~L 10+5I1~+ fl'4vINLE NNFYIEW[LL-4-S1[ w p ~,~LO,I~~a,S ~c`rmr t9a~ii N` I rael Y1FnCr (G[E+) vm r0 p0 ro wm FFnu f rs ': rtlna o'+P~iiop~Y conrvaw x A o .W.aNr rSS. L s °m'S:o~av aFS`~rcxas vIX1M1 T'PV I~ L0+ .o mar .. Lnc ~o W ~~~YIH9Pr 0 NY ~5 vuA aE+BLIX ~ N A S ~ c EH 2 I Lµ . U~ p r ry y / ~ ION_CFIVEMlY 4'199IX+ 5 5 ~'0 LMH£ 0-! w 4!!Y 5 ____ GENERAL NOTES K xa6FF 6 pg9gp LO+S 5}3 (v] 4 ~.rW ppv yY2, J ~ LOrS, i Lo+ } „a,F,F„L Lorz a WSr~ W. Lo+=) S+~W/~0 }WIIG 5], Y9 (ttAKYISIFIC P41]lA+lbs)AV~yO LOI+rW aE, 9. AptlSED 0.'EPML Ca5 v 5-J W/~f (SID IN~rS/99_J .w') -4E 9Y'K. +~HEW Ni rCr6pT~ RF/rNM ro. .Trm~o xrsv. cv* mas a.} a/~a fair wirz/9e J.a) r. TSSx+ Lua L~ v uro uz g a+srrcNriu. r asrrcN+ia. xarsrviu, w E LrcN m.¢ ssrnxn.L nE Cn Lr usoaa ro ff ou. vrsr. LFrrxa Aw. rrE ol.. w mrLa+EN+ a w.w nc oa. uwr vnu¢ z g<nw.. n.wiw uu 0.w. m£lV !/.2R SvS IfY N S ~M vufp rx xZ9pNF /gym xE ryE 0./v IY rtA ]RiL+uY 9WL SWIN+a i.ED up OtAx1Ep 9v 11CSOi5rvICI.W 5. SgCIG~C 4T.WS C< Iwp.~A6 S+py u+Fa u2 5162c1 /0 ¢IIr~ a4FavH By 1. RtiEiOYNr YRV~AS LEPxPKN1I+ nE IrLE ff 9HxSS~WT rWRh1EN! uD OIM iW' rtNS. aS~W 9uLL ff YLO0.1.9FD M IIE KWrZ1q'rz J +K w515 6 IK S@rv~5~ W WNl4- OL~w¢ FAYlpIIS 914/_ S ggVllY- ~S RAx,SL BY ilE <lM1 RY1.4YNI SWV~AS CfP1NI1M/. A¢Y SEIF/V IO ff N9YIIXD NO [W£L+tD IO 6 O41 vIS+A S:T.P$_ 5<RF tllY M AS !' 4rx~yv P. /. 9dM OIIfR1~;_ ). Ev~m¢ 9l4L !E FFOVrR- W H14K fp+1~KO d.NIK F~d15 W/MLLNi +Y 1105 M1EW ~F£0 pRIrG !/+4L E1ErKOVrK. sxSE. , c rcroslrs 9r4E a v.,o ,N .tmm..a .,+N aniN..a N,ax uez .m 1n. s ou. yr 19. Vl1Ll+l ES 9WLV 4VLEX.IXNM ua EL4_YNrz RpvICEp 1S KCESSWY. +a nrovloE aw ~W wm~co s+rSF+uwl sr.ranns.w nm15s ie xo N.~F .a+.vrrn av-z -r+. rcrFi.wcN+ sFmr¢s Aow IYNI m 21. YpEfi1AY+~ft 9WL d" ~N Ix IlE L~M1 ~ O4x v~5+! LVpSCUE u0/tlt +If ~+IY Rup1 vILL.K aRS~p ftAN. ~~• SW L BE CII6ThlC+ED 1x vTd6uR v1M pplxxl£ W. IR} (IS I1OttO By utllNevF M. IbIJ) 4" FE CI M1 ~ OAIA vl D. 4L NM ~N'K pq ~L ftlOl+-6-N.1Y 9NLL K Di£ /N ~CYYMJ 2 N1Ix +1E SI~W110 S4GEIGIIIXS ld ftB1L 9T5 RM'/l6C.I W. !I[ SW OIE40 wgA WG1CwL C+upAW 1N1KY M IK d UO Cos+Mr1P' SrWUWi 6 IIE C1rv 6 ^JLx M1£xrtgwvlS+L M+ALLm /x 1[¢WU2 v1M +IE C1rvWW1I V~5IIV¢F~d wF 9om a MSS uK SWL d" V3O 151 W1[F Ol v. aY:IpAILO JO IK L~M16Oi4~vl r~BV STw~A~ ID. 11Eq RJ(A'rK0 K65349Y 6Y IIE CITY R1fl.MEN+ SFrN~CFSSIX-wrlExr, YO 1¢TL WLS W Y 4' d11L! M~LF N l~x4 bG FFCaN+~W. m KFEW ~5 NO SIB£CI +O W]rl~G+1W Ix IOOS6+w+14 fINWYWF vRfiVVN. 9. IIE L~ M1 LELO. ryfEx+lYRVILES~w ~s Aro.[n rse w.nrtF urr (rciomaoml s®insim. N-anvlc nrw. wvs wr SE nltn IN na!/Piu¢ Nr M +rE pa)nsva ff unvc 1 6 s[na auw.1 r rK 9IDivr5lO/ wa .u'+. - a+re wwog a>9mmmw nu195w1wnaa ;~S~,Nro »W1E-1£,4~OLS .,M LEGL .GY9'.,m ,K ,xIEx10' ,FNBFFF,w "'aE ,o ,E~w, 9IrLAF,- 6aI w.rN ao sE1w m1N IEFFa ~s vraLmixw. va seen m 4aince. rw m Nu A,rw. i_ ¢1sYUwa..w vEw4cN+s+sevNL An wx.ASCx. ~xncnm~ ua s xcmo/. rm N nc Anw .a ~wvu A +A AxEaxNr. } ~J x~xa Rv GEOIEPfx 44 I~I~M9L w@T Ov: f£RW ~N[RRn1 R-WIFO vL06I ta. Sl. SdFfE O' IOVTUNY' Fri Y. l9tECtl/L ~ Y ~ iK F£CrdN~F RP p:LL,+v CM+A4 BJYO ARIID~n5W4 +E2NI. . rwxoroL.as w1LL a AmnLSO.+ 1u A.o Fro nEFIS ewrw rrN.L vnruxNC s FEWn® e. nc un AIfLtrYExr vrvrAS• ArwrrN+ OWNER/SUBDIVIDER x. >o, ,~. Jm~ ~~ Jr. ,~ 3>m) „~. LL ~u.~ r, ~ ,~ ~. L;,m L,wIE,+, a~,N. ; ~, ,l~1r. ~~,~ 9w~,a SI~+E rVO 10 45i ~a4r. SuriE raltl Sw O lLO^ G- 9P1 ZW ¢~ElL. Or G_ 9}iOr (619) 2111650 (6~9) 1.H-1050 8/aryl 9N1N e.lfl.,N 0.t+F CIVIL ENGINEER 9fi9fiI6r ~ES~i/SL~~TS, Sw nrEm. rnr (6`al sseavrO cv ~mv. n FEL~SIAN W1~P PESW i}/Si/rr ~ SHEET INDIX sHEEr1 .1rraE9rLFFr 9NEET 2 .911iEE! SEI:TpN9 /OElAIL4 9NEFl9 ~TEMATR£M1P LVl11d9 BNEET/ ~TEHTAThEdHP LIT f IO! 9X22(9 -TEMATME MAV LIT 11L9 SNEEl9 -TENlAThF M1P LN 1149 9X22((-LOT SIMNIMY/GLLUTAilON3 OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 2 CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA ws~ nM Fwn nln rr ? / (i[riW a ~ m p ~ ~ u n[n onruNS o nws .. rvrt ! onsnrs uv~r w +.ws un y yl: yaI wL pyE (MON lssr wnu cn9 f o[Narzs u uiwuu A r~uuu u ro £ i v sIWE i~ 33 _ ~ p 9 ~ , ~~ L §~ oFNaIES RZ ulµuuW lO S~ wnwuu SLroE O iJ $ "6 aw PARKWAY RESIDENTIAL ~ ! ~~ ~ V, wws BLAKE PRIME ~ ~ .v L O HERITAGE ROAD No.rosuu . :a ~ ~ _ ~ ~., -. ~ . _ .o. ~s=.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \a.xM ~r~ ~ x.+ ` ~' um L u sanam c ,~~ T annrns w a' ~ fENLE ANp WALL Ht744! pL2F fli FLNCE nNp WALL HFJLNi 85' 0.4 NNOER Ii I Js ~L ~~ !~ ` • _ . nA~ ~ f i . '~ ,.o ro, 7YP. WALL/PROP. L INE LOCATION _ _ ~ _ ~„,~„~ ~,~ ug w s...,,zm rAS.rw.vv, aR _ a~ ~wh .o, ~N sc, ~ ~ ~ V^~ ~.R. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~m2., ~ a =°~~ T1P. NEIGHBORHOOD TRAIL SECTION w„a""m ~ ~ -,pus,......, ~.~,>,~.. AO[N025 3 u3 u W , un A0.°E rz w[zs om[nvy vmw a'rtus SECONDARY NLUOE ENTRY © SANTA VICTOR/A ROAD Lmax tiExrcwE xwo ro BABa ouxA xnAOl „ .~ ~ ro..av~ src..,a ~ o ° ~ ~ ~,ms m,..o +~. w .* ,.sx + * • ~. u n vn..a ~N ~.,mo~.x-..N Sm.rr.oM ~~ _.N..9.F . u.~, 'n,.~ * JENOIES ,. NIHI„NM ,N 5. ~ .A.,,.NN sLOPE "0 ,,.wt,s am[.,rt ao., a,... SECONDARYVILLAOE ENRfY © SANTA VICTORIA ROAD PAP~ESNIM nuxn xwo ro rovuaraFa~xrAAUm •re/ r~v~ .~. N~.~ Lwrn **., ..m... ~w,~ s 1 ~ .~~ q ~,.. k OEN01E~ m[nv.n v40GEVwssrs nrtnim'snow'dturs RESIDENTIAL STREET PROMENADE QD SANTA L/Z4 ST., PORT. SANTA CHRISTINA AVENUE, SANTA CAROLINA ROAD TYP. LOT DRAINAGE DETAIL vl ,: T1'P. DRAINAGE SWALE f50'LENOTN aR LESS MODIFlED CULED6SAC R PUBLIC ALLEY TYPICAL ALLEYCROSS SECTION UPPER PROP. LINE SHELF ROUNDING T1P. RETAINING WALL SECTION ~`,~.N .ES }F ui 5: i v sL CGE O RES/DENTNL STREET PROMENADE PORT. OF SANTA CHRISTINA AVENUE AND SANTA IW AVENUE ~~ ~~ M -m ;~, ~~ ~ ~ ch o r C~- 1 L- ~~ v i ~ ~ t'- ~ ~ h ~ I ~ '~ ~ ~~~ ~ z Q \ „ ~' o> r. ~ ~ v >> ~ ~' ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J sW . ,~~ ~ ~ Nt0 ~ i ,\ vr" 4 / ~ v iv "mC FR z ~ ~ \w ' 'i ~~ m'~ % Q ~ o ~.i ~~ I ~ W V~~ A ~. \ .A- ~ o z a ~ eY~ - k ~ ; w \ ~ ~I ~ ~I y I. I~ ~m °' ~°¢ A~ kx' fP~''tp .O~~F ~ AID ~ t y N.RI I Xo°~ A a ~ '~j ~ / ~~ - R~~ \ ~ eII ~ ryJ I4 ~ A V.~ r o° ~` ~ ~ F~~[~ t b `~ I ., ~I ~ ~ ..~ zt ~ r t ~ ~ ~'~ ~ / ~ ~ o _ ~ I ~ V 1 ~ ~ ~] @S ~ O ~ I q~x _Yy t ~ t~ .. wr ~ ~~ ~, • ~ i ~ ~ © i ~`" ©. ~ ~ m ~ ~ I ~/~ Or ! ~ ''wa e l.1„ vo ®0^ >. a 0; ,- ~ ~ Z x®rx e ©i. \ :i \ ~jaa .N E . pi. say` o z ~~ty~. ,~ \\ 0' '~ si i 0' ~~ ~' v ~~ \\ 0 _ r ~ ~ ~~ ~^. ~"~ vv 0 ~ ~.0 0 ~+~" ~ ~ ~+ v ~ ~ v Oa ~ ~ % , v '~, g - ~ 0, v ~, Y ev v 0 ~~ v ~ ~ d'°v ,, } f ~. ~l a V' oao &8 W n a ~\ ~~~$~' f~~ _ S ~ N ' ~~ o ~ -~-fns" , ~ [~ ~, ~ ~~ ~~ ~ V ~~I„ ~ \\O`0 \r= fI V i w .. ~, n~ ~*v~ ~' x ~ ~ mna. 'vnnoara n,ws ,O ~ ~ ~~ 9 \ ~~•` 4 ~'~• ~ 1 \\ ~ - ., ° - _ _ Imo, ~ vv ~~ -.' ~ ,~ '~K? ~G~ ~ ~ - ~ _ ~ R p - -- s ~: / n.-~" - ~ / ° ~ ~q.~~. ~"~~ ~ S g@~~ ~ BOUNDARY , ' ~ ~k. I F;$$F ~ 9 a _ ~, ~~ ~ R6GORD ~JF~,RV~Y ]~'6E9 ,~ /~. I j i -- SEE SHEET NO. 3 _ ~ Iti II`I~ ~ 4 v, ~ w., ~~ o o ~ ~,~ ,, ~`~' ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ a o .. ~~ Io- ~ ~~ -w~ Q ~~.~. A. ~ . ' 1 6 I Paw rEUVaa ar ruaana urvU~~ ~~ ~~Y ~_ ~ ~~~~ ~I off: ~~ 4` ~ ® ~~~~ ~~~ o ~ ~°~ .~' ~ ~" ,~,: 4 ~ ~ :'~~ ~'~n ~.~'-8 N ~ ~ ~~ r -~I ~ .~ a Q.; Q c r O O '• A ~ L~Q ~~ At ~ '_ - ~,.., I ~ ~ ~ A ., ~ ,~~yy Z ~~ose~..~ '. ~ ~' ~y '_ Q ~ ~. ,w °_ ~g ~ ~R ~' o _ ~ ~ ~r n a _ ~ ~ ~G ~ ~ ~_ © . ~ e ~~`~_n ~ ~ ~' ~ ~~• r AP.Y 5A~ 313-D5 ~ `~ h' a( 6 <,~v Q ~ OP z~ a O, i s / o ~ tk 1l fi ~.: o s~~ a ~y' ~ ~,.'° ~ .i ' .. c{ e lS v g d " © c~ ~ i . I '~ SUBDIWSION ~ „ ' .I ~ 'i l v i 3 ~. . ~'~ O e O°::~ ~ BOUNDARY w ~; ~ _ _~ '~~ Q ~ 0. .i~ ~ n G. ,o / PcO ~... ~:Q rs ~ju .Q ~ ~_ .i ©i ®i1 j~ '~° _ 00 ~ oo :~ < _~~ Jn1 v , l :o-.~ ~ ,cam ` wap0 .O r QS'~3 ~ ' r ~ r O. O ©i sp ®i a.e,..~ 9 ~ i ~ ~ _ ~~ ~ i o ~ ,r ' y' Da ~~ ~ i i I ; ® ~` / o ~ a I & r 4 O ©J y ~• A d }• p .~ I ~> ~ ~ i ~ p J m _~ e \ - ~q - (~ r ~~ ~ ~ o O ~ ~ f .9 I i ~,r ~ ~ ~ " i r r .. all I o...~.K ~!- O ¢. :~ r :N' ~ \ r I ..~~.~. .. • .. "~ ~ ~ ©i I ~ .. .. \~ .t ~~ _ s ~ y~ ~~ _ ~ I ~ .~ ~ ~' ~ , ~•a ~ / u ~ ~ i~ r ~ yp w.za,F , Q' (3~. ' r n I I. Q'm ~ © r O ~ ~~ ., ~ r i ©i. ~ ~'.e ~ G F ~~ ~ _ © ~~" _ a 1 T ,, ~-~ I .. • ~ o ,, A a c~7v. `~, suer ~~ ~„ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ o II r r - p.~' ,. e ~ ~ ~. ~ %A I P y ~ ~ ( ,, ~ ~ ` ~~~ rzrv ~ / / e f _ ; , ~ ^~ ~ ~ ~m e ~_ ~ ~ ~~ r ~ - -, y i ~ _ , ~ ., a <_ ~ ~~ ,; Y L "~ n / 1 e ((/ \ -tt-- ~ :. ~.ao~ ~y'~t` r _ / ~ ~_ .. ~ ~ ,... w ~ _ ara~ ~ ~ 1- r i~ ~ ~ I~ 'i ~~~ - ,- ~i ~i I~ b' '~ -- ~~ ._ SEE SHEET NO. 5 ___.___. _,..~_ ~~r~ of ~~~~A ~ISr~ ~~~~FOH~Ia ~ ~ ~ ~~- ~y SEE SHEET NO. 4 j a / ~~ __ _ ~ / \ ~ ~ // irtxuo /~ f `~ / ~/ iE \ // ~/ ~~ i n n ~~~ wm SHEET ,,,~ a..,..,~ , ~ i ~~ ~ n~ :mil i '~ i 0 F'JT~Rt GTAY ~'/'! LAGE 3 i r ,r~~~~~~,v ~ D~ ~ i p ~ i -~ ~ i y_ i_ ,~-~, ~ ~ r ~ _ li _ ~, ,-_ i< TEMPORARY ~~ U STOCKPILE 3'~ AREA ~` ~~ E '--~~ y y y k 1 y\. ~\ ~w n /9 ~~ w ~ ~` E~ /~ ~O- Y ~} /4 ~g 11 ~~ ~- ,- - ----- FUTURE OTAY VILLAGE 3 l' ~ 5~ / 6 / ~ ydt / ~ / M / ~ j~ ~~ /~"i SEE 6 SEE SHEET NO. 5 - ~. ~~ - s ,~ "f. ~ , ,. a~ a' ~,S K ' /~~. ~~~.. ~~ ~' d- ~~ ~ s i x' q ~i/ ~ _ - ~__ -~ _ - _ .. .~' ~ ~ ~~ / 9' ~~6~ .- \ ,~ ~ i y v i P' ~'>' ~ ,a9' \~ .~ •. ~ A N a i/ ~ ~ 9 rF fi. ig4 / ~ {ye ~ ~ \ / 4 ° i/ ~ Ioma~ rtuwur / i/ Qa° a ~Ai / urtn w nwm mm \ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ muncm cwr wror y // ~ r~Yauv mr r° a ~K/ ~¢ ~ a / i. • ~/ ~' ~ ~"~ °~,%~ ~`~ ~ FUTURE OTAY VI~LAGE3 . / ~ , {. .. - \ ~/ • ~ _. t ~ ~, ; ~ / "~ioo o '- ~0 204 lw p ,.( ramr -svrAC goo ~ ~~~C ~) i' /~ ¢Y %~ S' / "4 mov ww r ~ ,f ~// S rxwmn[amu um `v i'~ f 4 ~ i~ M E~ i~ ^ R `1 ~ ~_ i 4 t~ 4 ~ b `~ ~• ~.a _ ~ ~ a '~: c~ ~ pr'// i ~ ~ d' ~r~~ y' q N ~~ _- ~ i ~ ;.4 v // i / // . ~® a.aia. rv~ ~ ~ s ~ M e / a.~m~..a.e _. ..~..sw, .4. U~ ___ i a i. 4 a- ~ r Iii i• _ - -- I ~- - ~ m~ ~,.~~ a _ ;" -~r ~„ _ :. ~ »,~.,, ~ - y`If~ / _ ~A sK.u wrte.-mx wq \_`~~ r - ivnNT m ~nnnutel 2 ~/ / ~~ ~Y ~,.~~ a i~w+ovEMwrs - ~ -_ - w.~,m n.* non a~K u<f~- ~"'4[py1+ 3 ,. 1 r `a - ~ _ t ~, - -.. ,, .~n,.~rwa w~,~.... ~, i a~ ,_' <~ ~'~~ w '^ " s . _~~,_ \ ~~ c '~~_ ly- 9H IEIGHBORIgOD R-111b1 NEIGHBORHOOD R~1BAIb) NEIGNRORHOOD R-0s(bl NEIGHBORHOOD Rd1 NEIGHBORHOOD R80 RHO OD R45A NEIGHBO NEIGHBORHOOD R35B IOTFRE/ LOiO LOi 4RE< _ T•- L _ _ LOL4flEA SUMMARY TABLE O LOi/ LDTMEA iOTKSF OTKK I2N - RSf Ly1 iOT4 SF /pEl1 roTUac aTe e m w RR~~O ~' LOT SUMMARY/CALCULATIONS SHEET ~S~ TENTATIVE MAP ~ ~ ""° "` °` CVT 11-03 CITY OF GHULA V6iA. CALIFOFNIA 4 NEGHBORH OOD R-ZB LOi/ 014REP 4 a~ EtN mEVm ToTxx NEIGHBORHOOD R~1/ NEIOHBORINJOD R3fi LO1/ LOT ERE< lu Sy ~ _ s ly-~7 ~-. N wcwmMAP PROJECT WAIVERS a fQwxvnArmmanuL zwlr vr[IwrA yp/rrl IO wrn' SIMLI (.s w, mslrN ircin). PC DISTRICT REGULATIONS OEVE/OPMENlSTANOAXOS SFJ/XMl V E+S~rw [R RFrR pI wSA (S f. f vcm S, WJ m~re. (s.U ..ppp m .. fLpx Aq. R.Irp ~ w OI qpM (IEEI) IH (iFF L rEA~ O .I YI6AIX W I zIMEi mri:IA¢ WIiA2 JO evaLlw Krwls ~`orr (ia~l`a ~ J sen. w. r.., rroyr Ium AIEAo- nfEO M N pIKfI IXlpr GFAf£ O 13 W Ip srQ ENTRY G¢1¢ EF IO wM RETr@'}¢ inrvrc 6v°'rirsira a• r. NPr.M9 s ix r.w area Avrmn xs. L O 0 Ea iSIAKE 4,REN CEIAOm g51xMES KRAWA [N C~ LOI LIK 10 LM Io WRAx RIM m Fwr wrV[Irnr sLlBna LLV Ku YAIq ¢1RRIX x RES,CR2 N. LR~KF~MAR4IXi 4lEr 5 ~ ~ .WLE i NrL Y OAL wS p TENTATIVE MAP CVT 11-04 OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 2 R-6 CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA IQ=Y MAP LEGEND Slmrv191W m.wMr vro mEV.I,W ~slcE~Iru Lp, O'k71 YA[£ LOI KrObCVn OD 6Ex YA[E mI dPoR pllpr 19T (2' I WX) iGP[EM LF WME srRfE. aEV.aw 4TIX uAM (6'.J YRA INrEAI ELEVA'rM urEn WIN lB :1 rrpr R.a9,LNr aru lYn WIm WIN srm wuN6e :) REnlxrw yaE ND 0." y4t ElfvArrW IIxr9E0 ARfAQ ELEVAI/w siISLI LIOII GA}ENI E rK GAYNI H/BF Puauc ununes LEGAL DESCRIPTION pI u aU zJ rY 044 vl M. C6-ps, o Lt.Q TAY pad yr ^ N/2A 1 xryf LILYQW1. yr A. NWir6yN S OrEW , SIAIE p" 4LIfmlIA. RttggrNL Ip YV IKREO' M- rU _ Erl£D IN il[ O"fIST IK 54v plEm Nxlr gCLIYA W W v M, SY6 EASEMENT NOTES >vzI ~ ~o ~. NRElulwrer II nE a:a91 vRwaan Br Wrrm IInE cavRN. wWrd 9. mll 9N9Sr959-r/50 R-~ Q mm-eN GSma EW FRrV.re.rclrFmAL ALgs uo mnnr nPwSES F:rmam uC I os-zt .zoos .S OxwcNl ro. zmsa.zse6e 12-9 ~ O (asYxl rxwrxl 11FY )l - ua aSEbvl fw GKEU~dy~ gpwSES L9u+rEp Ip rli CIIV 6 auA yr S,R g f T [GAY ,SWrN) i _ _ ~~ © M asEYNr fav w.lwx mProsfs w.N G ~ nn m rzc cm x aaA .InR W .ve ZI TXrJ AS 0%rKxl M ]WJ-p]YP99 ` (G4_1fNI NraWlNj S6 • Q - o rm 9R -w Gsewr fx mcza ,vev s aMIEO ro nc cr,r x ow rrsrA ov Y ~° AS.ppsL.ENI w. moo- 9wp s c z ~s /c4 Nl :a ~ y. '$ Ic Ild .1 -.w a4.Y.NI fCP M1SrC uilt llKS IWKSS AM V.KSS (RU/m ip Sw OImO _ _ __ _ ~N • fiECiRrC w wK1~4 1 ]WJ I b. 10.tl-[p}rl6p 1E44YHI IS VR_pne9E - EaArG'I O ISW INj .... Q I rwa-wG.xrwllm KKWL LIIILIn.uo AC+rss wwAx .s mmW WR rvm „ _ - (GArwr p murx~ -r - 1f~a .c¢s 4.o uIILn. NUrosss amvm Wr I az ~• ` °~ u C a s G ws9 Y © r e . u p 9 a mL r z p z9 (E.AUrvI .p av.rN) rw © r m s -,w G.AYRI fm wowxia~ Imaxrn r..~osE Imr N IK c n x W...<fl. zm,,, II~.yNI w. zmI-p, ramp °' A f5 ~ [G41FNI1p {aL.N/ ~ o-' ~ ~ aNORArIaI1M14ENi `q,fml'K08lI SrHlIDN3 GAVIFO Ip l1E :rIV6WArI Vr SIA 01 mo ____ (E4AYNI IsWIN) z~ LIIrQ~Av ":~ ~ ~,5";;. mRIN IELfvr4£ I wS A`p 6EC MrC 4NC C ~I. v. OvC~~CQr[M' f f Y Sbtl15 A r ~ sREIU,EA WIW IG aVW. O BIRI[T LOTTING NOTES I. maECVna a slw ce ua21w x K ~omrwou s Fnr rnersv Io GIE OTp x ttHI61(NI~ IK lrul /~IITeD INRa51m.CR[S R (SII;E's, EERII. u IX'u ENlx N®_r[vOl IDA2, ETC.) ew EzIAa Ixo e. rK mu~re .rM IK mrsw.r u~ Irc crr. ~I~. 1. IX1 pG,rMr 0."^C IO JBNdRIEE ,E Mt .NiIX'm ,pY alfl. MIFW RfrKYxl xILL d ESIaYIPm yrM IK flwL 41P5. J. tl4l/ IDACE LOR MO lu£,wCIiS WrxlEily¢ ;OIZ 9giw' w 'IE RNiAIrK Wr ~ P®IVrxp IN .Wrll 0 ~mp xrm g4Elw uO LWIC4 EAIpSrW p=ELECIRI[wb ~IWtrWS GENERAL NOTES (PoSS A®rnsrW .SA },..9,L. K, MG (CA-'S yrMd p5 LpL,: r}.6.6 _ z. r x amrw mrs z mm ~ x ~ wm Izfi nzs nrnE cwar, r Qw sA¢. r K,oernam ~ mex mil ssw vum. N-.s-x. 6 •n s. E.ISrw/pwasm ¢.rna n..r~lvunW uv f~ ou. Raw ~J 6. arsrw zwuc., vJ. afir ;xn rc msmrcr,mu.rraaJ v. mxPpAn zWrr.L., al sr (rCR mA AKwcxp ARrnpmo mar r. rn mw s m/RC !n wrrs/IZS Acl RWSN m6r ir: I N/R[(rM Wr)S/Ip.6 RL) O. I%SdI tAM ViL: v MwJaTD {ab r5E S lr q$I(GVIrY f 6FX 9A6 WC A85IANIrYLrQtOYigvs I T pLLA vl 4 FLw, hE plAv MUa1 fJ)RH RKL WLYI FUN aO IK OI~I RKOI vrLLM£ I Y[lrp4t R.vNrK AFEA :,.x. RF zrS,Ex Ip 4- rxS,,W[p Ix ttWMK{ /r,x rK St.M.LOJi 6 IK plAr .A TER pr9,RroI wp ~ ff Wrx,.IK„ 4„ ~R.,m Br RE pr9IRlE,. Ifr<KtIWS 6 WYtrK SIOY RR RR ME S4fLt Ip 2lArrtD Mppva ei IK =Kry mIELUYNI =w91~ a>Mr,dl., rK IIY x ,,~r==IW m ,„I ap .'1i.Olw ftMS. LCSr W 9WL Y R(Lpai I9Ep W M &zr5 f! ilE r2Wlrpp~IS 6 K 9BJrvrSrw WNF4. pLrWrF E1.IDEYIS 9W.L 4 wJVIQp AS dWl Sp Br ryE Ll rv mawwl xwlcES pwMlrNl. Rr 44F N 4' TtlvIEED A'O [MCCiED N I. p" w1R Vr SII yM[RZ. 4S4 WIIE .S 6"uINIYM 4_v.L r/t pIKMe4. LvIttKE 9NLL m Mpl®6 ruVr ~AIfED GPMIw FI W15 [CW .PH¢YI 6' Fmwrr..4re Ywlao wxrw rlwE EwlKwlw. !. slxEr ,REf srrs A+uL Y vup Ix.ava,.F~ RIM omlNa¢ a.a-R rx9 uu w. Q IK pQR p* W1A VI fi.rrrfs Auu x :.aer,LUio -uo Gmors aRpvlxo As Knme.. r9. Y3r aL NF'4K0 5>KEI L DWI sIAWUNS up frXIV(S IN II£ lttS up FUgA/RNI~ By IK cIIY RIfLPIF IYRVIQS RvMnENI lOi I$ IL RIpIV-yAY. A. A[K MNIIIE 9uLt S Ix OpAYL yIM IK frll-6OIlI v15IA C.y.MCM aO/OV tK pIAY RMOrEVrW21Trw 0.A'l. TAOI.v6 9WL S ~51TSIFD IN ACCOAU6 Rr M 4O rWr6 M. INI (AS kLlh'9 By O'tl INMQ M. 19]J) p- ll[ Lrrv Q pAll /I 33. ALL rtM rx rK qq rC FIpI-6-Gr 9WL 4IJ.K rN ILmQ11FE yrM IK zIAKUNJ 0.5 fOt H9_IL AWfz nvamKlrW. M prEm .u [R FEGrWY S OiAMlwz ~'~ aD IK C£Srp .Yp LyalmL'Ilp/ SINOAIAS 6IK CIIV p-rJLLA vl fIFE xvw.WlS I0 4 rwl~ rN ACfdOAKF yI M rIE LIIY 6 d1A yr IA 31W IS y599MwM W9NLL 6C LA0 RSR~Ix pt r. z.. x fmr Lvnv mrs ro a o9.wm ro rY cii. m a4R .r rz xco .Krsri'E"o I~YQSSM. er xc nrrmx%xYw ARVrxss'~.wr~wl_ wrs wvs arnT Iw mrrwE Iw smwrlW` m: ~w ~Krewa ~wRRw~r R~ov~s.WL `e:'Irc Rcr`Oi:`¢vnwa.. IsF`r`wl~slm n_ ors Rm.c6 Is w P4rvaE wl, (Yroemos) Aslr.rslW. P4 xu was nnf fr 11£S rvF5101WyODAw£yrM PE np.r51O15QMIr6E .fl ALtIw 66.Y.IT z6-IINLL Yar3 W r 6E R£LpEFD fm IK ~ Q .51®IVr01AC VrW 4S W ftNtrgS DEh{rF IxtO WluMnm NJp KN 0.p5 yITN 16.V. ALpA yIM TIE rxlENt p' SIGN Ab 5E4 .9~pWIMIIERM r5 rRLrYrµ1RY uO 96LCI IOWrfrOilpv Ix TINY. (CSrW. .VO R9W{xI SrtM'Ma EESI Ww2KNi twCll¢S HILL BE INT9dA1[0 nC gSr4V uO I,Wf1(HIAIIW p! ,K xlCLO'NGlI. n. I SL r.lww ap.EO«rcv. RE>•o9, Rmr.u.n Bn amr+ rrea®o9.rzo wIm Awrsr re. r1. ~ m ILro ANN: w~RI ,,. L y. FFfER Ip >K -. ,EO w.Lr i. IE Gt KNiI' »;>.r.ED B1'r,.61KR . ,SSa I.IEz !m 49q_IN2 :IM IK RmrgIV~N,I iER puLrlr Q/IIF¢ giNJ A/N Spr6IrpYL K.an NmLwas PULL FE rRrvlOm Af W 4M Rn StREEh cwlw llwt ' ~iKrnrw •x.~an..~~.~o6~oalK garr<sKNE mr (i¢~mrµrwYlL.a t.rarz OWNER/SUBDIVIDER ai:: zaiu~ rr rs~ sM, LL WIm LrMrS,. ~M. a fE` y'"£sii wIIE Ism ~cm. u. 9zrpr 16191 Y].-.0.50 si w.wr'~r:us'I'aulrERS. LL .~E; L,MnrI. LLVOrNr e msuxu mA a'_ Pzrallsm (691 z>a-W50 8/9`{! -PUn'9yppp Ix ii MIE CIVIL ENGINEER 9M10 NN2EZG MEE~nS, S.w OIEGO, rrC 9Rr~, (fiY) 5%.Wp r i~ a s. v urRKd'. re c. r. .>9.s re u n.KCrsI rvW fal„~sw lzn r/II SHEET INDIX 9NEElI-lIrtE9HEET 9HF£TP-SiNEET3ECIlON9/OElAILS 4HEEI3-IEMATIVEMAP 9MEEf1-1ENTATNE MAP sri~rs->FxrameMAP C S 3 S C c J /~f- ~~ s r~,~ ~~rv ~. u rv...a °°~ "` «~. + _ ~`a ~ i~L~ ,w„ na ~uL~ .. w ~ a E m ~ ~ - ~ ,nos ~.. +.2w Yr ..o ..:<rr,.T. r ~ ,.~.~ wox.,~.~.s ~i ~ .~„ "°°""'"" TYP. NEIGHBORHOOD i ,,,,~~, a,,,,,,,Q uow ~, ,,,,,, TRAIL SECTION ~y": ,'~ ~'~, * oENO~: z. wM~W~W M.=..W,,, =<ooE 0 8 LANE PNIME HERITAGE ROAD .o, , ., ^~^^~ ~ ,.~ ~ a.u I ~,.~ «~ ~, 7YP. DRAINAGE SWALE © BLANE PMME ~~~ ~~="0.X m0" OLYMPIC PARKWAY ~ °~~~ aw. m~:9.a UPPER PROP. LINE . _ ,,..., _.__ ~• ,.,. ~ ,.~ y.a SHELF ROUNDING PARKWAY RESIDENTIAL © FRANCESCNIOR., &1THAVE CATHEDRAL OAKS RO. TYP. RETAINING WALL SECTION f£NCE PNO WµL HEIpII OLER fly' ~ENC£ arv0 WPLL HEIGHT d 5' 0.P JNOEP TYP. WALL/PROP. LINE LOCATION _. _. ____ ----1 __ TIPICAL LOTTING DETAIL ~~o, ~aL I ~ ~ - - - - I ~~~4a a~a9 <~L TYPICAL LOT DRAINAGE /~'- ~y' SEE SHEET NO. 4 I f QQ ¢° 10 u I I I ~ ccrss / ~ / 4 / ,p v~~ 107 p_4 ~ !~~ ~ ~ I LU P~ ~ 41 Pa~ I ~ ~I ti ~x D ~j . ' OL °r ~~ P=445.9 I ~°i ~i a' 8 I r I OO hcsrc rz Amu v/ -41_I at a ~ I ~ I ~ °q~s~e.~rx~ro~i~rc~ ¢ xo.y / _ ~ LI 21 ~ = ~ ' L O uwares rxm nqn wsuva r.Qxrm l ~ a ~ 110 ~ '~ ,~ i ~ ~ I. , P-44s~9 ~ ~ ~ p-aa.a ~ I •- e x I ~ I. I ~I / y P=4az4 ~ pw I' A ~ I ' ~ I s~ 1 ~ I /9 a ~ 41 ~ 9 P=445 9 P=45L2 I 78 I 43 P=445 9 P=a51.P „ I~ m ~ ,/~ I ~ ~~ I ° ~ I I I ~ I ~ ~, , P=N9 ~ i ,o ~ 61 I ~ I ~ I _ I' S9 I ~. P=449.9 i I ~ i y ~ ' ~ I ' I I~ s ~ , 44e.J ~a . ~ 45 I ` ' 1; I 60 i. ~ t P=4 9 I ~ s ',, in s li F=_449.6 ~' n ~ ~ I i ~ 8 ~ i ~_ ~ ~a I I ~ i x 172 ~~ I~ ]7® ~i ss "xca wv zo o ~ v3 A i T' ~. P=44J4 ~~ P=4455 ~ P>45L0 , ~-; ~ _ _ __ ~ - o I ~ II n ~ I ~ - se ~ ~ CARPINTERVV` ST ~" / r - /'//1///, I .x 114 -fit ~ ~ nwo rz oo ~ J oa- 4 ca ~ ~ 1I\ i~ P 44fi 4~ ~5 i I `ded O , .d t ~ u - - ° _e ~aa.me+it_ ~ _-- _ _ _ ~I i ~ f / x ]13 ~ o=cN S°ncc ~` I S - ~-~ - s ..- - __ _ __ _ rde~ L~ I_- I{i III ~'4 ~ I I P44JJ ~ I ~ n' ,_~ ~ 1 - - - _ _ I I ]4 a ~... 47 I ri ~ 1 1 4 G \ '~ '~ i~ 116 ~ ~ "I IS P=4a9 a P=asJ.9 Q I I ~ ~- ~ -1 i ~e,.. ,. ,.~ 46 '~ ' I I ~I o~ I ~ ~ I ~ m¢ Y P=449.2 ~ 8p=44H L, ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ I I ~ I ~ ~ ~ 117 I P 448 J ~ ~ ~ t i $ ewa. I ~ ~~ P=44S5 / I ° i ~', ~ ~ I ~ 11 so ~ I 1 ' e . i ~ I I ~~ I I ~~ ~ 118 c ~ 7 I I I~', I ~ r ~ I r I ~l ~ ~ ~ P 449 5 f 5 ~ ( ~ 10 I ((( ]3 0 48. ~'s F449.4 sr ~ P454_ I :. ]2 a qg F~49.4 ~ ~ P=454.1 I •I v ~ _ _ / it ~ r _ N I 4 51 ~. o~ ', gl ~ i ~ I ~ I I °N=4aa ~ 11 ° 50 ~ v~sr.4~ I ~ _ r .a 120 ~ _ O ~ _ ~ -. - -_ m I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~~~ u~ e 119 -. P oa5 s I L ~ P=449.0. P 45J.9 I ~ ~ I. ~ I I. ~ I I ~ il., i ~ ~ -+ 1 P449.4 I _ _ _-_ _ --_-____ _ ~ ~V I N ' II ~ ~ _ I II ~ w. I "~ I e ~ P=asoa r~ss.J I o ~g ~ O I I i ~ ~ s-~l p ]22 ~~ 52 I~ I I '~ ~ Y I P 450.9 ' ' / 499.98 ( ~. I I. ~ I so' a I ~ II I ' ~ ~ Y i I I 4. r / -723 I-a I ~ 121 ~ ~. . ~ ' I 1 g ; y i I l _ P451 4 (P[N P P 4m g g ~ 9 ss I CE l I l( I i' I ~~ I ' ~ 7 Y / ., ~ ~ " 6 kl I ~ rte' -~ I ~ ~ I I I~ I ~ / / i s m ~ - ~ I ~ I - I I I i y l% ~ , ]24 j~ ' I Oq i ~ I i. I I_ P=451 4 _ 'I I O ~ = A P=dSI 1 ~ P=4.,5.9 © ~ 55 P=451 2 ~ ~ 4'=455.9 _.P=454.9 ~ _ __ _...- _ Y . - 8 W . 0111 _ - -... __ ' zz o0 ~~ o ~ /~ v.rA - -- -- r ' ' fi an --- - - - - ~~, ~~~~ l5 z. ~..a, zo ~- _- w' _ ;.~ ~ ~, _ S7 ~ti~. ~r~ ~~Y~ 3 / ~ 8 P 64~ ' pcP ~~-' I I I { y i a~ 726 -, P~a9.9 ~ ~~ I ~ i Ise Ia i :a~ ar~w4s I~ ~ ~._ 56 ~ .~~eF 'a ~~~ I I I I ~ 1- ~ I ~~98 O _ ~'~ i P-a55 J ~ _ 125 sa I ~ J '~ I i'I ~ ~~ ~ s s8 ~a~ ~" II i I ~ ~ xss nsore zmoo I ~ _\ o P P59.J PO ~ P 454 I ~d ~ ~ ~ / / , oioo zr.oo „ ~` ~ y5. I ~ ~ i I w ~~ ~ -. P 4 / 7 _ I ~ I ~ I ~~ " ~ P 455 2 , -0J ~a~ /~~," r9~p0 ~I i ~ ~ fig. ~4 ay~J roD 5~ i~. I ICI ~ ~ ___ of I z ~ a~ z9,~y~ ~ ~Q44~ ~ ~ 1 /' ~ _ _- ~ I ~ s~,4 ~ o , ~ j j ~ ~ I ,~L ~ ~ s, - - ~ r ~°; ~ ~7/1 / ~~r~ ~ / ~~ I a- r r= I ° I I I i I \. ~ ' ~ - ~ / ~ \__ / s II I I / / l l l l~~ .~ ~~~ ~,';~~~ i / ,/ I I I~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ly-/ov ~ ~ ~~~ ~ -~ 8J `~ I 1~ I 1~~ I ~ t i I I I ~' I i 1 ~ ~~ ~ 4 ~~PG A%Soxlw ~ Kn ~ ~~ S I i -~ _~ ~_ T -- --__ __ y/i - _ SEE SHEET NO. 5 /; _ ~ - - Oo „ P --- - - - -- . s ~ ~' _ ~ _. - ~ _ _-_ ___ __ ___ ____ .'~ ~ ~ ~ 83 82 I ro 76 ~ 75 e ' 4 ,. I. ~,~ :a, .o~ ,- .o I P=uo.6 °v=a4o.e 1 77 Pa4J_~ P=4~ 74 ~ / i 9$ / ~~ P=usa I, ® I 91 a ® ~ 89 88 ~ ® 85 -~I P=a4as „ ~~- II ~ P=44JJ - P=44JJ - - r a5 ~ n a i ~ _ - -PF4J6.2 „I eP=4J].J P=4JJ.6 P=43J.6 „ P aJJ.3 I° P=440 2 ~~P . ~ ~ ~ !,f ~1•~ ~ /- ~ l ~ -1 ~ I - -- ~ _ ~ 30 ~ f 81 i ' P440 ` 78 I „ 73 ~ ~ ~ ®p ~ // S VA~A~ 1 -2¢ I I - ., ' ` . .2 F=44 d.4 ~ P=443.4 ~ . (. I ~~, \ ~ ~ P 435.0 ~ 'P t~ << ~ ~ J--_, - 93 - FaJ4 J ~~ - l a 91 n O I 87 ~ ef a 86 O a s 80 ~ I ~ 79 y. I .„ 72 ~ ~ ~ iti~ 1 \_ ~ ~ ~a ~y_. ~ _ . . -__ _ P4J64_ ... __ .. _~.- .Q _P_"~9 ___1 I ___ P=439 3 ___ 6 _ P=4J9.J P=442.3 a. I d P=av o q y _ I 1\ y ' ~ ~ ~ P 1 so _- T V I ~l ~ g k 98 I 41 i ~ I ~ I I P 4J5 I . I tl~ I I axrzv c sus I I P=~3.8 I!I ' I 99 „ ~ ~ ;~0~° ~ I , I P=4J5.6 I li I I I ~ I ~ ea e i l - I ~ j ~ 100 I. I I I ~ I ~~ I ~ _ z I I i ' I I~ P=435.5 I I I ~ I ~~ '~ I I I 44 ~ 102 I _ & P=4Ja. a~ ~ „ I I III 101 l i ~ A ~ P=435.2 104 I I ~ P 940.8 C ' ~ I a, I „ II ~ c~r/~ III P=a~.v. ~ , , ~ los ~~ a~ - i I I I ~ ~ 1 i r-a41.J - I I NI I ~ ~ ~ I i t '. - _ ` A 1106 I P441J ~„ I I l r 1 „~ 108 I l ~, ~ ~ P=44o. ~ rs~ v m ~~. rr xeo ,c v\ ~~ ~ ~ 107 ,r O I ~ ~ ~ xou /~ ~ P=44L1 al ~ rWjrr sce r l11"'/// s z, 1 I I ~ s m~ s¢ yl i ,y 110 I u s n¢ uxur a~ p rzs na _ ~r m i ~ z F-446.9 6 I~ i - ~ ~ II s "t09 _ r r I C I P=a45.. T-'.-= ~ I~ I I t s ] II ~ x I II P=44].4 _ m I I. ,I "_' I A ~ I s~ m ~I I I I ~ ~, ! R 112 I A I I P. P-M4Z4 ~„ ° I I' I..I - I 114. I ~ [ 1~~ a ~1 e P 446.9 I I \ I x, 113 _ I 1 ~~ P44IJ ~I I -__ x_ ~ J ~I ly 176 9 ~- I ~~II ~~ ~ I I P=449.2 8 1 ~ IIS SEE SHEET ~~ -v- ~_ ' 29 I h 32 P4o50 ~ ~ P4J5. I I I i L °"~~ - k'i 28. II 30 ~ 31 P=435.8 I I P 4J6 9 - P=4T6 9 ~ I = 35 I P4T9 J F444.0 l >z I I I p=438.4 a II a_ .a ~ ~ iI I ~ ~ Il A 36 I „I. ~ P 439) se P a44 5 ' :. .f 24 37 ~ x P 439 ] P 444.5 P=442. ~". P 44J ~ I 23 I _ 38 z P a~39 3 P 44s ~ ~z I 20 41 P / P=445 ~j P=451-0 i ~° 5 _ aP 40- 45 P=950. I ! ~ 17 ~ P495 , P4„L0 u' ~ ,® -> v _ G°F14 SPncf' 14 ~ 47 ~~ IS ~1 P=449.0 P-a5J.9 n .~ =448. ip' P=45J =~ s 13 € 48 A ~ ~ I i . P_rsa . " P-eno . NO. 3 A y ~ _ f y - {_ r eomf F zvso' - - I i I ~ l 71 O ~ ° I P=4J9. I 1 ~ I ~ -- I ~ ,i I- ~ ~~ 11 ~ a . tl ~.. ,69 I-. 8 I ' P=442 5 I: ~'. D II 0 ~ ~ . o h P= 4 .6 ~. ) 68 ie O . '. - „J PM m „ n D i - m > j~ - 1 I ~~' ~ 81 67 L ( P=44P 9 ~ . 1 ly I ~I ~ I 65 'P=441 ~ - I sz N Zi ,1 Z I I E ~ ® I v ~ I _ ~' P=449 4 1 8 ~ 4: I, I a p=ae o ~, ~ i - s~62 b ~ ajl_ P=449.9 I I ili 1 - j I ~ 1 I - I 9 I ~ ~ 61 I_ ~ ~ ~ I v 59 „ P~4499 L. 1 ~ a46' ` I = I I 1. ® I' ill 1 P=449.6 ~ ~ I X61 9 y ~ ~ ~ _. ...,~ ...- LT- ._ __ CARP~TERIA~ ST `~ ,pA1"' / ,- ~ o II~Gq o 11 t'JO IS 00 _ - -- _JL.. - j8F [2c aWY__. J - - _ _ ~. _. -_. .I_- _ _. - - _ - - - - _. - -_ '., I I 19 = 42 11 ~ „ P-445 9 P 451.2 I 78 'I ~ 43 -L. P 945 9 P=951.2 ly- a/ --.~ _ -- ${ Y ~. ~v~ i~. ~~ _ _ _ ~ ~ ~w~~µ~ R,e I ~ ~ -. _. _ ` r^\~ ~L~ j ' /A OgX45nG ~~~ .~ v '~ _ [Wie ~_ )I .I . _ .-.. __ _ ' !I ~^ ~ ~__ _ __ _ _ _ _ __ _v ~ /~6~4 ~y _ v ___ -~ ( v v asvtis __ g I / i ~~ rs4rot mezr 1 ~ ~ i I . OLYMPIC PKWY ._ ___._.__. -_ ___._ _. -- - ' -- - I _ _. __ -_._ ~ ~ I _~ ~ _- d ~ _ Po<, ... ~ K B ~ ~ Mod ~ ~ _ _ az as _ n9., ~. _ ~ ~ ~ - ~- -m~w s' +wr..m - e 8 \ ~. «~,~~, ~ C ~ '_. - o e ~ ; ~ ~ ~ -_ - -- s ; _ ~ -- & ~ ~ ~ f ,~ Y ~ ~ - W e _ ~ ~ - ~ - i _, ~ ~ ~ _ ~~-~~-- -~ ~ ~- . ,, . -- --- __ i~ -- a~ ~ ~ / -- -- i ~, _ - - - ___- ' -- ~ ,,, ::T ~ ~~ --_ -_- ~ b fib,... _ _. _ _. ~ ~~ ;,= ~_ _ ba _ _-- ~f~ _ ~_ ~ I :~ ., i ~~~' ;~; :' jam` -. -- - - _ __ c~1^ _. ~. < ~ I ~ Na w~ / ` ~~~1 i~ ~ ~,_- % - I e ~ ~' ' ~ __ / ~~ / / --- _______ s 83 ~®I 76 75 ~: ~ ~~' I ~(l V. / i .--- m '° '0 I ~ P=440.b -°P 4e0.9 I x 77 a P=443.] ~ P=44JJ ~i 74 _v ne ee P=44S. J P=4q. J SEE SHEET NO. 4 ~EP~~: s~EE, ~~f ' ~ --!~2- TENTATIVE MAP CVT 11-05 VILLAGE 2 R-8a, R-8b & R-9b, R-5b, R-10b, R-11 CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA ~~ _--_=_~ TOTAL 1N 19] 19 300 PROJECT SUMMARY PC DISTRICT REGULATIONS IYS'IXIerIW A I AIERAGE LOI AFTA (S. F.) OI .aYA LS. r_) F pt OA wKA xArIC 65 Ix (FEET) 60 M (F([I) L Al YIRAW K~ 15112£[ rtpvll2 _ f~ ~6 EAC p PVILOIw KIpIS 2`o""te~nglw .s~ a rran .a.a n .lrc wmr uwo- w lx 231,6 W KRIIe/NIR dx M1MO ®Y1BAV K 2vI K5. L r ¢iiLy®~sl ~s ro ~. PAnv m KRIMA q' NT[R LO1 w IO T4M1LIK ID l0 LµWI ~uIM J~O fIX O rFm sLre.u , ~, w IN ~ D~ o o K IIIx JD rD,I N:LERIKx.v:<rR.W v GVIRZ 6F w AEIEV 5 K,Iw ~.~J pa, Lxrr S/N3E [WRY -h1/.IetS PROJECT WAIVERS : 51R¢...Irc~w rscE~.sa~z~w~IOwL IKceWawlS vE AO I W I.CM a~ SAMA YI LIDMA R W O SvI. ~MM161LIRSIPgI818E[i4LF1Si44 LW%) © pUFI10N LK $4VFI bWSRW AYIINM 9.WIAAIEW AYE9NIE SWIANI'AVFMIE d4YM GNdMM 1g10N1D.GMIAIXYN AMD - µp r Irq vAlm/f.L ~0 ?EMSSK b1(r)(6) sw,..IVrcNL.m,/M o W I„ a ,.5 r•x asro,.mm~ s ~ a4 .Nrer s~.as rv KTiIVFO rte. u.w/ az.a G' LEGEND S+~,IISIW , SPI v LOt LM PAO ELEVI IIW Ie5/OEeTIn wr a=EN wvT fE/Ox.TlrtgJ MN SoALE fOi ~,D4 D, Ia a~ (~ 1 W., pEwE.II A- W Rr sMEr ELn.rILrv 2~R L41N (, ., SESR fNLFAT fLEVArIW u tERWIN (e'.) FIFE m(Fwt r.Ea./Mn .Arz»WIN ~~.IN w LLL rW rc..u nE4e IIW EwlsE- swsvc EILVAna SmEEI LIpT G~EIENI EIK Eax1ENr NNBR • Y16399M vMRIf SF Pueuc utlLmes KEYMAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION ---- II EF DU. .I LE.LE 3IA ,RA s'. ws °r ` n 4 z ma wrnW c vlu.a .. 4. x Ll E ff vu. nsrA .r o- vN Wx 0/EW, 5 IE6GLIFlWIA. ARATIIW IO r5350. r - - TILED rn M 0=r1¢ 6 M Sw 0/EW CpMry RECOSER p uAV 36, N,M EASEMENT NOTES I ~ vSF M1 xd11NINWY TIME RERHr PRFP.NID BV dIGLO tfft£LiypµY M/ultal 9, 0.tTR M. 9.W}rsBW50 RJ Q q lRV fo-µumcNrFm WTER Prr2 uws A.n verve Aro ExuYAnm saa Aro OS-2) E/65E Ett'IVAIFD 41IR ILLS WM'/ED IO RE CIM1T SNa 0/EWW Jlr r.. !x BX1[ IlV, pA¢ K] J LEEDS 12-8 (GAICxi ry FE,W INf rlEN rl- WPd VrlLrll[S. lv]2SE UO EWE5S L941R-/O S.w O/EN < ~ o- g r le. I rx Earl sJe. uz n. a mr/cK RELUOs ( ~iE~a ffw n Y - us / •J zF © E4 rT R;IlWIL ~I~CI~SIVIIW ~ 3]31 ~µH RE ,w ~~'~ D ua. r SA ' I.4 E iE.~r,~~rN, ... °wpr FW AB.ILUTIE, rIEJ.r V E S IN.wIm rD SW D,EiD I ~ 1Q µ ~ ~31 ~ 3 Ci R vf}H.e I5. S%V a3 FiCE.`O- yy__ R [ 9P4 /SMI ILOrTA9S - EAStiENi ry RN11NJ _ / _ _ ~ AN EE41(NI Flle 4lFkAL IRILIIY YO µl25$. L.YOSLIK 91i£FA .VO SlL(Eµ.a, ~ AR K ALR3S M UlrtrlY R955E5 AS 99w1 M 4N ISSSO (EA9EYI IO f E/4rx l _- ~ r r~ 2. - A4 GSEILNI FW 5IP¢i NO ftB IG~iLI rY RRV35 lAAVIED N DE [IIY 6 ^ W . ~ Ylsr. a~rzeR A u rllE w. . tGSEK„1 rD /.EW /N) F /rEN z5 - Fat CEw~ Dr/~ T. Aw AarSS p.s14S GANRD ID M Llr. fN~F .. ,LC w-zWT-DS«I33 ~ "'~ ~;o' x W ,~ E.g, NI ~ v .I /rtL 26 -.w uulExr Fes qgs O-LO t3 , w0.as 4o E~ AS w.wrEO rO F5 2 W I n 3W S nova aroax ., s mvA2xr w. I u [ ow rs o o-a us r r r EAS}ENr NIhNIrN] ace cm s ouA nnA IAiEA LrAr M1ER 0151RrcI /N rc OµA vlsu IEIEHtt£ GS MD ELEGR/L GTIMS y+EIn K SOWS A ELEIGrNY 50M 015IFILI SUER WRR u:IW xrp 5Wp_ OI STFICr LOTTING NOTES nrsnfrl c n.artl.w W LAm./w a rcroevaoWS rs rot MTrxm FIEIOIfi ~~. SERS. uRF ~py4OG x gSLfL DtN ~W. [IG) XILL R ES rfq 19(D RY !If LE1fl,6TA IIM M COM]Mp2 6 TE CIIY OGIIFIf 3- LEt I/GIIW 6 KIOIXA IXD RaldpfES IS Mr INIEiIID Iv ff.nAL1. f~MF AF/ rs ~XrLL~D~ W N~ L02 F9PWe/ W M hNIAPK a am/Yfnv INTO AmInwK ms rv WRSSaa IIM P,uslw .Nl LalcK ExlEna/W s accmlc Ko 114rIwIIW srslals. CONDOMINIUM NOTE .I~ m si ~ a z rr. ~E o"/cWUrFa~~Nl-~.Iaw sF~~IEO N.vrsl.Iwa rv s M sW/vI ~IWIWp AL,. n,wuw /cloewoas fl6lrcv llMM ncc NM£crs CEVPUnov µF N-:w Aro R-R M 4u'I4r N/ER ff O~u~w NIrs Is mE rorK (sr rNR ~m Ka I~ fNrs-Ip_ GENERAL NOTES fAOEE~S®:Y,3/W UF4" .E r O~Olifw u9e r C lE1IlYCS S,RFE:S) roTk w (f9. R., LD~ r6.W LD13, R-S4 (JSYtvIS SMA OS LOrS) F-G % (.6 4 LOIS 9 Or51 R-0q JO (Ip 4 COI; I LTIS R-94 6g (69 4:OI$ 0 R-;1~ 2(]1F L6I$ 6 LOS) Wi-rf} } 9AQ LOTS ~ AL MJHR S M-OYO W/IS 91 (IB. Y AW I~ lFJ ASYSSOi /NZL xIHP 6 IXISr/AC//FWgO Q1FPK Mx EESIp4IIM U// P..rfi (KR OIAY NNUI OP) GISIfW 2/NI AG 4. (RAK'OISIRILr SgAIIltl6J iMN492/I/IIG-fyl (RA IDA A/E,PP'I) o. urROVEO me/I. Fw /ev/Rp Lorl/w asA c.I mas r z5 a//.c 'J3 xf rsn is Ac) ll. ~D•OSE~ ~wIIY FW w4/~ m..,w .a.: Wr nn WlTSni3.L) rt-pAfB ].BW/AL (r) In'12/9.9 AU R-5& N/AL IW wli5/l-l AL) ,,.9 W/µ (IK W16/3 9 AE) I). VRE4xI LµO Iq v J. RNV4.O LM V.g~ 5,6E EA4/LV FES/RNI/AL 16IIV .PM£ m15 NLV 9~IAV11µLV [0~W16 Iv T bµ. ur ftµ, ry[ oIAr RA`Ol ¢`pAt 419.OlENI M1N14O ryE OI~ LR.upl v/LLH£ 2 CI ~ft.w:lw A5{A RwN. rFP svS,b ro MIKIED /N 1MAWS OF IK o.Ar MrER s. W c I paov4rr rIM M sr vrsmsr ua smr. aWrmAlrm uo vmurm e. M-rsremr. sacrnc owns c /wn/w snm ..rm .RE seco ro ¢IAIaEa .Pwm Rr M u n aKLwENT sxvlas OEP,wnExl RI M nc r ae.ISSIW ~ Iwvvfl2Nr.ro wnDlw a.L+e'. as w wLLL r KmnlxaW 1w Wsrs ~ M FEwIFE.cN1s v M sI®IVrsrw Iw¢ umwrs wKL a wvvlcD As cwlREV e. M cl rv rc.amMNr swvlL¢s~ap.wrcNr. 2. s.Nll,wr s.r Io a P,D4rom uo cwccrm m vI s wE. nsu soaves. srw wue vM)K4.. v. c. IFiss sow vMxllsE. e. ~rrs°-,v[E s4LL ff X,D4rrcD ~ wvlw mrAlws Wwlw Rrwrs uw maaNl ~.r Ms NEwlfim axles ErwL Ere IrEERNnL. a. s ~. TREr ~PU~rs sw.L c P.ID / crvmua .Im aolN.r6 vNeEn Ises .4x w. 16eI HIES 9WL 41 µp EA¢/p.IS HNVICEO AS K¢SSNI. W.. SBJ/v/RR IO FPWILC ua //S IKL Nwmt(0 SII£FI LIMI SIUDNgS uO EIYIIMS lx nE rnE 4U x/t(R ARWKY Br IK CIIV 2"vELpY,vI AM145 IXVae IIFNr rOi gb.lC 4tl{ ft/NI/nC SwLL 9E rN ACMO :E IIM rK Clrv W pLLA VISI,r /-N4YaK uWµ_, A^O/W AY RUpI VILIA¢(CSld ft.w. Z]. Lv.N/eG 9W1 RE " ThU'IED IN A¢OA46 /I m pp/,4/¢ M. 13J (w4 aL(NXO 9v U91NV6 ro_ ,9D) W RE Lliv W WAe Yl 3.. KL FM1N IN M PAIL RlWi4-N.IV 9uu S MC /N Amumavs v/rn Iv :IVUU.m SS. ~I.V4AWw 9OEMl~Tµ~IN AttGWx£IIM MCIrylp4AV rA fEElp S 5 SInl6N ~MIryN,W y4LL 6E uSED •S~A~ICE MY. 26. CER911 fFa~wRSSMVSDVO~ IrY E(Y40VExr YR~RS R-M IIENIY rE [fm 46F INIOIw .W KEEL fIaES WY E BIl[I Mlpt ry! NLL WP AEC~III M` IX.NIw 9gMl IEgT' lS %tt(NINNY KO A4£Ci rO WJIEIW rIW IN IM' L EESIW 9.flECl l0 SrbSIAVIIAt LYYFObav£ MWVK 9v IK CI iv K W1A v i1 p41 KEPlw' R94e11(nI. MI5 NptGI IS 144TIgf INII (N IOq%M4) StE01v151 W~SYRiI%.E ,IN4 ~ Wv E[ FIB ELWw21IM II{gpv/3/P50=Ae rf (iE 16 YCIld S.%, 0= FINKVI~SIWW FE[I2COMD r~Je RE gxAq O- yg21Y101/IL' VILLA2S Cx pNTIpS IKREFf Y9NL£O I£/ORFMVS IIM LEGK A[YSS IIIX IlE rMExrY IRµSF.~lw rrRE INTO! PV L¢K I. SaN piAIN AN) SERER 9gvI IgCM IS %ELfu r,ugr A'p pgC[T IO MLrF/GIIW IN I~WL ~ [61W. J2 I aEAW9vI SIpeMµ~ 1 WN.4FEN! taALI12511LL K IK.llWtlL 1(0 IN IK LESIW VO IAEIfNIArIW O" glEtO SCI, JJ. %[I I41~ i KOxpNIGt 3PoeI GR. TAR- 9Y: W IwdKNA20 HIED IIN51 IB, 3WJ. ).. SP.MZ ~~ FaLPT /. L V4 FIILe IO IK 'I pML/II iEON/f4 ZPoiI' Yiw® Ov IIJS'AIFR S ASSttIAIES ILn P411AHF (IMAM gLIMLL IAIFR W.U.IM1 fPA.t4 9y®,ApI501C11wµ lEelll o<ilan~wl .mss ~allx~ Lrl~c c~l°I:Imc'IOjn+I ~ ass~'R'~"".Irr:...K,I rKI.I,Ir, W4E II 6OI.IV Ix Abifi GLIEVM IA 2rEFµ vAe1K.P91/p /0 eESIISG. NIR IW (6 9) 2N~b50 9}IOI ~/MI CIVIL ENGINEER pA, DES S ~'"I,EE. SrN DIEW. ,w "~,'~632,21 ,..L .°rvlil~ e ~lO,:.S~r / ~ R,,,i„ YY KLSiSIFArIpEB I,SS~-E- •~5 WR SHEET INDIX suEEri-im.ES99~r &9EE(1-SRiP£! SEC/90NS/OETANS MVEEi9-TEMAIREMAP 3I9EET1-7EMlATIVEMAP BREE(5-1EMA19VE MAP &fEEEB~ IH/IATYE MAP sM~r~. rsrtarnEAwP l~f_ld3 N wcINmMAP ~m rim 'srx~ m un~ Q sECORnaRrnuacEEnrnr SANTA VICTORIA ROAD ..., i . ~ ~ ,~ I u~lz.~ -q I ,~ - a ~ _.? ~~ ~ I' p A Y ~ ~ ~ ~V c K ~ f T1'P. LOTORA/NAGE DETAIL SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ~_ ~I~ FENf£ ANO //ALL XEIW I OKF 85' FENCE ANO NRLL NPCNI 85 W VNOE4 TYP. WALL~PROP. LINE LOCATION r 1 i nun _. uswcur I I .~~~~Raw.~.PAO~~~,..F,~~~=a~:~~~.~sn~. ~~ %~ °i ';~ TIPICAL LOTTING DETAIL © RESIDEMW. STREFlPROMENAOE SANTA DIANA ROAD SANTAALEX/AAVENUE i i ,. ~_ aye .,„w,~.,~~., 1~ ~s m~s~ rte. © RESIOENIIAL SRiEETPROMFNAOE SANTA /VYAVENUE SANTAALIXIAAVENUE ~s o~,s ao~, a aw. 0 PARKWAYRESIDENTIAL TYPICAL LOT DRAINAGE 4PACK LOTS TYP. DRAINAGE SWALE BETA/NING WALL SECTION rsal.EncTrIOR LESS MODIFIED CUL-DESAC a a~ ~, ~~o. ,. ,.,,, UPPER PROP. LINE SHELF ROUNDING .~_ /~- /J~/ ,, ~J- - ~, ,, ~ , ~ _ s, ~ ~ --~-- _ --- _ \\ \ _ \ ~~ ~ ~~ n9 )S.r. \ \ ~ \ ~~ ~~ ll O P 4+ - a l ~___ r v v \ . P=462.8 ; . ~A "~, \\ n r P=4521 es ~ ~'F., \ i ~ ^ s = ^ 72 ~ ~ ~ `_` _ V ~ \\ ~ ~ /0 P-462 \ \ P_462.4 , \ ` P~5L1 ii u 4 ios' ~ v P=469.0 - _ - •" `. \ . $~'ra ,. \ \ ~_ ~ \ - i ~ ~ ~ ]3 P461 J - =y -... \ \ ~ \ ~ o uR.~~ R ~ \ o e - Pro6 PJ ^„ ~ . ^. rv rs ..a 2S . \ \ _ ~. cuss .M 6 ~ ~ t_ P d565 i n ~ er P 468.5. . P \ \ acwrrocu .mcs uro n uscxcxr ~ ~ _ \ -- .. ___ __o d 14 „..u ~ O ~ , v - ~ ~ ' a P 4603 ~ P=468 0 _ , 'a 26 "~ i ~ _ - . . , -_ _ r e. _-. i0 ,.. ~ yo ~~ 15 m„y, -~ ~ a ~z~~ ~ \ N ESL; -10 \ ~ ____ moo. - ~ P 460 J PM6] J T ~ I ~ 27 ~ ~9 y P=466 2 y \ T , \ ~ ~ V~ ~~/~~/ 1 Y se `° ,y ,1 rC ~ \\ ~ O i i ~ P=4558 ea -M ® ~' ^ 1 ~ _.. ~ ~, e~ \~ - \ \ '', ~` 1 A P=460 ~ , 16 21 ~ 28 , ~\ ~ _ . ss . ~ o ~ P=460.8 A P=4EJ I ~ yy n P a6J6 ~ ~ \\ .a k s . e~ y y .~ ~ ~ -. ~ i 10 v P-4~ " .e. n 17 ,'F ..& .20 g ~ 29 P-458.8 °~ ~ ~ 32 ~- ~ ~_ I ~ \ ; `l j P 45] 5~ ~ P 461 J ~ =46-_6,2_ ~ ~ P 4bJ 2 P=4689 ~ \ ~~ {' ~ ` s ~ ~J.J m es' ~ I _ ~ ____ , k ~ s ~ ~ 3, - u v: a 33 . _ "~ ~ G S ~_. _ O _ P 4 ~ ~~ 18 19 ~ _ 30 v6 " ' P=469.2 p ~.$~ ~ ~~ _ = 6 r.J a . o ° y _ i S P 4b6 3 ~ ~ P 4bl B P-065 4 o s ~ q ~ ~ es' i ~ ~~ / I w~ ~ _.._ ` o. A . ~~ \ v s P~58.5 ~ -o. n „, o o r, / , _ ~ z.. _ _ ~ 34 ~ ro _ ypX P 469 B Y._ ~ m ~ r ~E > e _ es. ~ vc r_u i.e n PVflAMID PEAK ST sz ' _~ i"- ~ - '. ~ - -. __ ~_~ ~ ~ _ -- ~- ~ _ , .. / ,' s 6 O _ ~. ,. ='; -_ . O H ~ w- , , 459 4 _ 462J ~ i Q l , ' o . so , I :0 0 0 \ \~ £ ..I . .. .°m. ° 1 P=4IJ.0 _ ~flx \ __r _ 3 _ cDc O P=46J.2 T 3 y P=460.0 es o P_q0 _ O O y~ P 463 J-' - '* P=463.9 ~, ~° ~ hf I ® 45 ~ ® 43 42 41 40 39 38 - 37 36 35~ P=dfiJ.3 ~ P=464.0 ~ P=4fi4.6 ~ P=d6@ 2 " P=465.8 a P=46b.0 = P 46) 3 9 P=4b8.2 ~ P=468. J P 469 6 p P 4J0 0 0 P=4J0.5 19 © a.. m .n P=4 ]2. x.uui~ 4~ 9 47 3 6 _ ~7 - 19 _ 1] 14 _ 13 a 1$z 46J.2 P=46J.5 P- -- _4 46JJ ~ 60 en 41 ~ ~ - 68J S P=469 61 ~ ~ tP-469 9 P-4J0.8'f ~~ ~ _q f --l P-JIJ P4JZa bo ~ ~ ~ ° r i i ~~ s O ~' O O ®~ O ' i ,2 ~ 'e ! ]7 ~~~~ 4639 P 466 J ` ~ " P--06L0 " F961.9 ~ P=4b8 J 6 P=469 I R ~i P=469.5 ~ P 4J0 J ~ " ~ P=4JO.J ~ P=4J1.6 ~i e e ,o ,o ,o r 6. 1~ _ _ __ SEE ~ SHEET- 4 N ~~ O P=4JJ.8 ~_ 23 ~ ~ P=4J2.9 i. -- _. 6i24 23 26 __ ~_. \\ \~\ a 28 n P 4I4. J _ '-~ s 6027 29 8b' '=4]4-1 ~ P~IJ4 5 ~ ~ ,fvPcxn.S. ~E. s° l~l-/~~ SEE SHEET NO 3 Z H w N w N SEE SHEET NO. 6 PREPMED gy; SHEET HUNSAI~R TENTATIVE MAP 4 ~~~'~ CVT 11-05 °` ' CITY OF CHOLA VISTA. CALIFORNIA _ , \ 46~ m 45 ~ ® 43 41 41 ~ a 39 38 - ~ 37 36 a 35~ ', \~\ ^eizray. 21. iJ.J p=464.0 P=464.6 P 465 2 P=465.8 P=466.4 p 46] J `.P=468.2 P=468.1 P=469.5 P=4]0 0 P=4J0.5 - 19 ~ P=4IJ.J ~~\ .u - °.uu .'f ., a \ "P=4]1.8 ~~ ~ ~ o 11 ., - 22 ~ v 1' •~ - `, \ u es ~ -' ~ eo50 n ... eo ~ -w . '° o ~ ro . 50_ y. ~ 'e / ,~ -~ ~. P=4138 ~ ^ ' \ ,e.n is` u~ 47 O 3O d © sa 0 :o ]0 eo 11 : 1$ 60 ]S , ,. 18 /~ / 23 28 '~ ~ \\ `~. s P 3 1 - 'P I6] 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ P-46L5 ~ - _ P-468.4 ~' l P-468.] " P 469.6 ~ '~P=469 9 ~ ~ 410 9 ~ T--=~P 4]l.l 8 z P l~s - - -412 4 P 029 I P-9 ]4J ' r ' A\ r- % ~ ~ ~ I ~ _ \ ` e ' so' sr eo so so se ~ I e z L__ ~~~ (~J so I ~]4 48 ~ 1 ~ O ~ O - i ® } ~ } 12" ~ } ]3 - 4 I i I 24 25 ~ ~ 26 17 ~ . -27 29 86-A ~ ` s Pro61 9 f P 466 ] " ~~~ " P-4510 x P=a6 .9 P=/68.1 " ~ P=469. I P-469 5 a _ ~ P-410.J " P 00 ]" a i _ P=411 6 P-01.9 P 028 5' P=03. I n 05 ] _ ~ ~ p=N4-1 { P~J4 5 8 ~ ~ ss H - i i i - sn .a T ~~ - su-.. ao- ea' co -s -. ez 4r el ' e so- 40'- n'. '.s •_ ~ l~ oo a m a ' ~ ~ - -CARPINTERIA.-S7AEET . ar.~E ~ j ~ - --- ~ ~ \ - ~~ z aoo z4aoo zs w zsroo ~ z]aoo ze+ oo =.= ~.. zsaco ~ ~.°"" Jo 00 JI.00 _ ~i / \ \„ _ ~ _ ~~ - -- -- - so--- , - - - _ i 68 ~~~I`"r 39 O 40 " ~ 43 ®', " ', 47 48 a SI 52 ~ ~ 55 56 ~ S9 60 ~ 63 ~ 0 Po4Jl I ~\ ~ 4 P 466.5 , / ,P-Qfi8 i~ k p=468.4 4 P=469.J i i P=x69.6 P=4]0.5 f } P=t]0.8 P=QL 1 i '1 P=4]2.0 P 4]2.9 ~" P=4]J.T } P 4]J 8 ~ P=4]S.i P=416.9 ~' R d m da ° e i 60 s 2 a Y e a ~r- _ 41 ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ ®-~ t = ~ ~ , 1 1 n d ~ i ~ G 62 65 ~ X X67 ' 'o _ ~~ qy X66.1 ,M Pro68.] P 69 G P-169 9 " 49 ~ " SO 53 ~ ~ 54 ~ ~ ~3 ~J 8 - P 4]96' , i ~ P'05. fi P-411.] '° - 66 - '4]89 ' p ' ' zl+oo ~Z y ' .u, ~ . 60 . ~ eo 1. „P 411.4 e0 P-OZ.l ~ n.,n P-412.6 ~ - P 3 eo - P 4] .8 ~ 4 ~ : i ar 1 M :o 418 2 e .$ Ox .-... .. Y ' r -~ a , ~ a L _ _ 37 ~_ _ ~ 34 _ ~ 33 ~ ~ ` 30 Q_ _ ~ 2 16 ,. ~4.n- ~ 25 ~ - ~ 9 22 ~_ ~ ] ~ - 9 ~ ]8 O - . ~ 77 , O . t"..' ~ ~ ~. 74~ v 5 ~ L 13 70 ~ 9 6 ~- 5 y P=-061.0 ' P~IJ013 r .-. u ~ r !x4)0.6 1 i ~ - P 4]I'. 6 1 1 ~ P_4]i.9 1 i P~J~B 1 i 4 ~ 4]J.1 9 I P=4]4.5 1 r - A 4.4 P 4]5.4 + ~ ~ _ r ~=415.1 ~ . P=416.0. Ip D ~< P=4]6.0: P- -O9 6 ~ ~ - ~ ~=419 9 P=480. ~ i ~ I P~8L5 ~ ez~ ~ , ~~ eon ~ i eon eon so eo ti r so ~ ee i ' i eon n' C. d' -'a' : eo ~ ar ~ ~ ~ m ~ u,. ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ; °' , ~ 36 35 " 32 _ i 3t e 8 + " 7 24 " ~ } ® e } 20 ~ i 19 1 16 ~ °o 12 ~ ~ ll I ~ ~~ . I P-468.6 " - " P 969 8 !. P-4)0.1 P-41I.I i ' P 4]1.4 _ x P-412.3 ~ i P=4]21 " P=IIJ.S P-473.9 " P-4]4.9 # P=4IA2 " P=06.2 ~ ~ ~ ~ PM1ZB a F-091 . ' P=4N4 " ~ ~e ~ P 4 . ~ ~ _ -_ i _P480J = 60 3 i _ ss _ .~ ' so ° _ _ _ _ _ ___. --- -- _ _ s¢__ _ _ __ sa ___ ___ -- _ __ _____ ___s___ ~ s ___ _`~ __ - ~ o. dou r~r..KQ .. ~r...~, ~ ~~`` w~ ~°` SOapp -.-__..._ _._ 1a00 _ _ _ ~ JI r00 ~_ _ a. oti ~.. _~ _ SJ+CO _ ~ vsv e'x wm Jd T Oeu wm. • a00 ~' u PE JS+W RSHING ROAD - Jb.CO ~H .. _ _ . 0 _ . ~eF °'" ° ° JBa00 _ . = ~ J9+00 a0r0 PERSHING ROAI 0 d 00 ~ ~ O] ~ 2 O~ O4 a ~9 ©~ 07 ~ ®~ O9 n ]0 " 1 1'F`~' " ]4 m IS ~ 16 ~ 77 a 18 s 19 a 2p ~o ~ ~ ,, 2] ~ a 22 23 a 14 ~ ,. 25 ~ 26 ~ 27 ~ 28 ° P=469.9 s Ja' P-416.1 x P-4]0.6 a P=OL p y P=411.4 P=41L8 P=4]2.2 x P= 4125 u P=412.9 ~r p=4]J r. ,6 P 41 1~4 A 0 44.4 n v 414.] ~ P-415.1 r P-41..5 _ v ~ P=415.9 F416.3 r ,o. P=416.6 P=4]2 J a z -. ~ ~ ~ P=411.0" P 4]8 0 . P=4]8 J P=4]8.6 - P=419.0 P=419.d P-419J x_4801$ i 1®~ p ~ J x .r s s w. x x as u n Ja ` N - a ~ _ ssa ' te _ __ __ _ _ __ •-.__________________________________________________________________________________________________________ o,, ____ _________ _________ _________ ________ _ __ tao - - - I - _._ __ _. __ _ _--- _ w -_... - _ _ _ _.._. ~ SANTA DIANA.- ROAD - y _ _ - -.- -_ --.- -.... _. .. - --.-- .-- .a - ~ ,z ~ _ _.. ___ - _- - _,- -. -. --. ~ I? __a V ~-f ''-37 YU'1 '' l I~ ~7 111E 17 ' -- ~~ . . ~ -~ ~ _ __ _.. _ _ __ -. _ _ ~ _ ~i/. /~ SEE SHEET NO. 7 mA. "tea, ~ ~ ~_ -~s~~a~. a, - 'mo,. ,~ ,~~ ~ ~.. ~ ~TA ~ R.~,~UT.f~ l,, .rl S~r~G ~~ \ ~ ~ ~\ °. ~ '' ~IPh cd ?,,~ ~~ f _ "rs ~ bA Y ___ _____ _\~~~. -~_ ~Y ~ ~ _ _ ~ A A~ \ ~, / ~ a"c`ow"ocu c m, cescucxr _ , ~~ -. -~ ~\ ~ \\ ~~' ~rernonau sass um'un mc~.ssucwr _-.. ___ ~ - __. ~'~~~ _ _.. ~ _ , \ I r. ___ p55' r~56E Y yip. ~ ~ __ _ ~_ M A A '. i _ i L ~ n~ .~ -, - ~ W a . - /n~/ ~- \ s~ r i 0 ' _~ __ '. \ _ ~ ~ ~ eiur[x rimr[rvr \ I \ I~ \ ~-~ ~ _ ~ _ ~ ~ \ i67 A ~ _ ~ ~ ~ __ ~~°~' ~_ zi ~ ~ _~ ~ ~ g \ k ~~ _~ -__- - --_~~ A r .m _'X l ~ ~ _ _ ?~~ r _ ~ti i / _ ~_ \ ~ e t r _j 2 0 0 90 - ~ ~ _ .S ~ ~ R \ u ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ I / _ \ ti P~90.~ ~'' I P~BI 5 P 462 I ~ 1. A -~ sceic t ~a _, i _ u _ i u ~ i i ~ ~-~~ i ~ '0 N i i T ~ O K ~-O a O ~ ~ < P=460) ii P 48L8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p~ P=990 3 ~ -P-IBl.9 ~ L f~ ~ k _~ ~..___ ~ I ~. ;, _____ w L ~. a APN 54 ~ 010-13 _ __ w - -.~ - --- ~, ! -- _, ~ - ~ '~ F MAP iVG. l~350 ~ w... -- «, ~ g ~ N PERSHINO ROAD . __ ". ~~ r ~ 1 0. A" ~ _. . ~ 00 4~«ao Saco x . ~ - l H ~ SCrID JE / ~G ~_ I , RAID ~ ~~~V AP/J oh; 10 r )4 ~ ~~-_, (7 U ;A - - ~ - ~~ ~ I ~~VA ~_ '/ ~ / ~ ~ - ra r n Q~ ~ e. o ~ ~~/l ~~ _ ~_~__ ss~:. '6~~ 27 28' - 32 33 ~ 34 35 ,_-. _ / ~~ ~ F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~~ ~~ ~ ~~ 1.4 P 4]9.7 .b~, =460.) _~ 0 I =461.4 ~P=461 J P 462 4 P=082.8 ~ -~ ~ ~ II{{\\\\~'~\\ ~ ~/ .~ ~ \\ -. - I ~ p / / s'. ,. - ~ ~; ,. ,.~ ~. ~. „~ ~. _ ~.~ ~., ~ ~ na,.~. -- - --- - ~„ -- _.. / ~, z / -„- - - ~ ~ cYmF1 ~, I ~ SANTA DL1NA ~ ROAD c -: - _ ~~ _ _ -- A~w n~~t-Ala-;o - !~~A? i~i2~1 7530 vn¢sulm er: sHee. °T'''0 ~s~ TENTATIVE MAP s aF ~fi~°~'~ CVT 11-05 SEE SHEET NO. 6 7 CITY OF CHOLA VISTA, CALIFORNIA ~y-~a~ /y-, ~~~ \' ~; - _ , M m$ O S~a £ z ~y °A.~. ~ - bs \` F J'} `'~~Bl /^/ O~ N W G~ ~ .^e.~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~60 ~~ ~ ~~ r ~~ _, '~9~ ~~ ~~~ ~bo~ SEE aw.,A. <.,,~~;vmPo. ~, ~. //_ ~~ ..~ Po u„ o~ ' - -- ___ - ___ ~ ~, ____ _. __. _:.. _ ,, i ~ <_, ___ SHEET NO. 5 _-_-_ "`"' _ ~, % J _ / Ci i S ~`~ov 8. JI ~~.~. ~~~~V~r~ fl J~ J~~JJ~ APIV 6A4 ~1L7-74 RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CONSIDERING THE ADDENDUM (IS-11-001) TO SECOND-TIER FEIR 02-02 AND APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE OTAY RANCH GDP, OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 2 SPA PLAN, AND ASSOCIATED REGULATORY DOCUMENTS IN ORDER TO REALLOCATE 113 DWELLING UNITS AMONG TEN NEIGHBORHOODS WITHIN VILLAGE 2. I. RECITALS A. Project Site WHEREAS, the area of land that is the subject of this Resolution is diagrammatically represented in Exhibit A attached to and incorporated into this Resolution, and commonly known as Village 2 Unit Transfer ("Project"), and for the purpose of general description herein consists of 111.6 acres of the approximate 775 acres located south of Olympic Parkway and west of La Media Road ("Project Site"); and B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approvals WHEREAS, a duly verified application was filed with the City of Chula Vista Development Services Department on April 5, 2011 by Baldwin and Sons, LLC ("Applicant, Owner, and Developer") requesting approval of amendments to the Otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP), Otay Ranch Village 2 SPA Plan and Otay Ranch Village 2 Planned Community District Regulations and associated regulatory documents affecting 111.6 acres ("Project"); and C. Prior Discretionary Approvals WHEREAS, development of the Project Site has been the subject matter of various entitlements and agreements, including: 1) a General Development Plan and SPA Plan and associated Design Guidelines, PFFP, WCP and AQIP and Comprehensive Affordable Housing Plan previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 2006-156 on May 23, 2006; 2) Planned Community District Regulations and Land Use Districts Map approved by City Council Ordinance No. 3036 on June 6, 2006; and 3) Tentative Subdivision Map approved by City Council Resolution 2006-157 on May 23, 2006; and D. Environmental Determination WHEREAS, the Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project was covered in previously adopted Final Second Tier Environmental 14-110 Resolution No. Page 2 Impact Report (FEIR 02-02) for Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan. The Development Services Director has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the Development Service Director has prepared an addendum to this document FEIR 02- 02; and E. Planning Commission Record of Application WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing on the Project, and notice of the hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundary of the Project Site at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the date and time on which it was noticed, namely January 11, 2012, and voted 6-0-1 to forward a recommendation to the City Council on the Project; and, WHEREAS, the proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at the public hearing on the Project held on January 11, 2012, and the resulting minutes and resolution are incorporated into the record of this proceedings; and, F. City Council Record of Application WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for the hearing on the Project application and notices of said hearings, together with its purposes given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the Project Site at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the duly called and noticed public hearing on the Project was held before the City Council of the City of Chula Vista on January 24, 2012 in the Council Chambers in the City Hall, Chula Vista Civic Center, 276 Fourth Avenue, at 4:00 p.m. to receive the recommendations of the Planning Commission and to heaz public testimony with regard to the same. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista that it finds, determines, and resolves as follows: 14-111 Resolution No. Page 3 II. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA The City Council finds that, in the exercise of their independent review and judgment, the addendum to Second Tier FEIR-02-02 in the form presented, has been prepared in accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista and has considered Addendum to Second-Tier FEIR-02-02. III. GDP/SPA FINDINGS/ APPROVAL A. THE SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN, AS AMENDED, IS IN CONFORMITY WITH THE OTAY RANCH GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN. The proposed amendments to the Otay Ranch Village 2 SPA Plan reflect land uses that are consistent with the Otay Ranch Village 2 General Development Plan and the City of Chula Vista General Plan. The residential nature of the proposed unit transfers would be consistent with the adopted medium-density residential designation for the project site and compatible with the surrounding residential densities of up to 15 du/ac and open space land uses of the Otay Ranch area. The transfer of 113 residential units from the westerly and souther]y portion to the northerly portion involving 111.6 acres would occur internally within the boundaries of the approximate 775-acre project area. The transferred units would be located in closer proximity to the village core that provides for commercial and public/quasi-public uses adjacent to transit, furthering the policy of the Otay Ranch GDP that "Urban Villages" have "higher densities and mixed uses in the Village Core ". B. THE SPA PLAN, AS AMENDED, WILL PROMOTE THE ORDERLY SEQUENTIALIZED DEVELOPMENT OF THE INVOLVED SECTIONAL PLANNING AREAS. The requested amendments to the Otay Ranch Village 2 SPA Plan rely on a combination of the previously prepared and approved PFFP and the newly prepared supplemental PFFP to outline infrastructure required to serve the entire, previously approved 2,786 unit project, along with the timing of installation and the financing mechanisms to promote the sequentialized development of the project. The requested transfer of 113 units will not affect the timeframes outlined in the previous PFFP. Development of the 113 units will occur in an orderly, sequentia]ized manner as outlined in the PFFP, as part of the overall development of Otay Ranch Village 2, such that facilities are available at such time as needed. C. THE OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 2 SPA PLAN, AS AMENDED, WILL NOT 14-112 Resolution No. Page 4 ADVERSELY AFFECT ADJACENT LAND USE, RESIDENTIAL ENJOYMENT, CIRCULATION OR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. The proposed modifications to land use and development standard provisions within the Project Site have been fully analyzed and will not adversely affect the circulation system and overall land use as previously envisioned in the Otay Ranch General Development Plan and Village 2 SPA Plan. The transfer of 113 units involving 111.6 acres would occur internally within the boundaries of the approximate 775 acre project site. The existing infrastructure (sewer, water, public services and facilities) has been determined to be adequate to serve the proposed 113-unit transfer, as described in the supplemental PFFP. Additionally, a Water Quality Technical Report has been prepared, reviewed and approved by the City Engineer, ensuring that the proposed project meets the required water quality standards that are in effect. An Addendum to FEIR-02-02 has been prepared and the Development Services Director has determined that any impacts associated with the proposed amendments have been previously addressed in FEIR-02-02; and thus, the requested amendments to the SPA will not adversely affect the adjacent land uses, residential enjoyment, circulation or environmental quality of the surrounding uses. IV. APPROVAL OF GDP/SPA AMENDMENTS Based on the findings above, the City Council approves the amendments to the Otay Ranch GDP and Village 2 SPA Plan shown in Exhibits B and C, and Attachment 6, subject to the conditions set forth below: 1. The Project shall comply with all mitigation measures specified in FEIR-02-02, to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director. 2. Prior to approval of building permits for each phase of the Project, the Applicant shall demonstrate that the air quality control measures outlined in the Otay Ranch Village 2 SPA Plan Addendum to the AQIP pertaining to the design, construction and operational phases of the project have been incorporated in the project design. 3. Prior to the 30`h day after the Ordinance becomes effective, the Applicant shall prepare a clean copy of the SPA Plan document by deleting all strike out/ underlines and shading. Where the document contains both an existing and proposed exhibit, the previous existing exhibit shall be removed and substituted. In addition, the strike-out underlined text, document format, maps and statistical changes within the Otay Ranch Village 2 SPA, PC District Regulations, Design Guidelines, WCP Addendum and AQIP Addendum for the Village 2 Unit Transfer project shall be incorporated into the final document and approved by the Director of Development Services for printing. 14-113 Resolution No. Page 5 4. Prior to the 30`" day after the Ordinance becomes effective, the Applicant shall submit to the Development Services Department 10 copies and a CD of the approved amendment to the Otay Ranch Village 2 SPA Plan, and PC District Regulations. V. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS If any of the forgoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, and any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to the their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition the issuance of fixture building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigate or compel the compliance or seek damages for violations of such conditions. No vested rights are gained by Applicant or successor in interest by the City approval of this Resolution. VI. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon enforceability of each and every term provision and condition herein stated; and that in the event that any one or more terms, provisions or conditions aze determined by the Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, if the city so determines in its sole discretion, this resolution shall be deemed to be revoked and no further in force or in effect ab initio. Presented by: Gary Halbert, P.E., AICP Assistant City Manager/Director of Development Services 14-114 EXHIBIT A 14-115 Ranch GDP/SRP a Pan 1I Legend ResiEenllel ..., iu. or.M~ u..~.~.i..~v ro. n: nw,.w.m n.~ low 4xulm [F'M1~I M+^^~'ylUA ~rn wryni vYT Unwe 9euMibi IINV) ,~ ~mr[imvrxeu.unuY M) - xN~m iuO~~Mh^N~'W iMN1 Special Plannlrg Aree+COmme¢ipl ..av CummLY lHI - n..aw UNI um.~•urvs~<=+a uvn - o.~e InCusVial _.._. w.vmn~imw u~+uuul PuElic! Opon Specel0lM1er - rv+..e P+w+wk.:rtU Rm+lub~ +'~ snw.. wa,e..~. se~maan a*n ~. - f ki6 Fnnauvi ',qnW COen+xr, (eMnl~l 4.m Pa~x~m ® wvw lyvn Wevmme /.. ..... m~'a mwVmin,m+ -~ m I.s Rd xwl • Nmv,~bm S Neue k,vi xp wm 0 rK s~ • a+iM neeauw bvpe ~d ~~d Exhibit B Adopted October 28, 1993 Amended June 4, 1996 Amended November ]0, 1998 Page 726 Amended October 23, 2001 Amended December 13, 2005 Amended May 23, 2006 Amended December 2Q 2011 1 4-1 1 6 Proposed Exhibit 41 Village Two Land Use Map ORDINANCE ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 2 PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS AND LAND USE DISTRICTS MAP FOR NEIGHBORHOODS R-4B, R- 6, R-8B, AND R-9B. L RECITALS A. Project Site WHEREAS, the area of land which is the subject of this Ordinance is diagrammatical]y represented in "Exhibit A" attached to and incorporated into this Ordinance, and commonly known as Village 2 Unit Transfer ("Project"), and for the general purpose of general description herein consists of approximately 111.6 acres located south of Olympic Parkway and west of La Media Road within the Otay Ranch Village 2 Planned Community ("Project Site''); and, B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approvals WHEREAS, a duly verified application was filed with the City of Chula Vista Development Services Department on Apri15, 2011 by Baldwin and Sons, LLC ("Applicant, Owner, and Developer"), requesting approval of amendments to the Otay Ranch Village 2 Planned Community District (PC) Regulations and Land Use Districts Map; and, C. Prior Discretionary Approvals WHEREAS, development of the Project Site has been the subject matter of various entitlements and agreements, including: 1) a General Development Plan and SPA Plan and associated Design Guidelines, PFFP, WCP and AQIP and Comprehensive Affordable Housing Plan previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 2006-156 on May 23, 2006; 2) Planned Community District Regulations and Land Use Districts Map approved by City Council Ordinance No. 3036 on June 6, 2006; and 3) Tentative Subdivision Map approved by City Council Resolution 2006-157 on May 23, 2006; and D. Planning Commission Record of Application WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing on the Project, and notice of the hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundary of the Project at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Project on the date and 14-117 Ordinance No. Page 2 time on which it was noticed, namely January 11, 2012, and voted 6-0-1 to forward a recommendation to the City Council on the Project; and WHEREAS, the proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at the public hearing on this project held on January 11, 2012, and the resulting minutes and resolution, are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding; and E. City Council Record of Application WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for the hearing on the Project application and notice of the hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the Project at least ten (10) days prior to the heazing; and, WHEREAS, the duly called and noticed public heazing on the Project was held before the City Council of the City of Chula Vista on January 24, 2012, in the Council Chambers in the City Hall, City of Chula Vista Civic Center, 276 Fourth Avenue, at 4:00 p.m. to receive the recommendations of the Planning Commission and to hear public testimony with regard to the same; and F. Discretionary Approvals Resolution and Ordinance WHEREAS, at the same City Council hearing at which this Ordinance was introduced for first reading on January 24, 2012, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista approved Resolution , by which it approved amendments to the Otay Ranch Village 2 GDP, SPA Plan, Design Guidelines, the Supplemental Public Facilities Financing Plan, the Air Quality Improvement Plan and the Water Conservation Plan, and four Tentative Maps; and G. Environmental Determination WHEREAS, the Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project was covered in previously adopted Einal Second Tier Environmental Impact Report, Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan (FEIR 02-02). The Development Services Director has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document aze necessary and that none ofthe conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the Development Service Director has prepared an addendum to this document, Final Second Tier Environmental Impact Report, Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, FEIR 02-02; and NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find, determine and ordain as follows: 14-118 Ordinance No. Page 3 A. CONSISTENCY WITH GENERAL PLAN The City Council finds that the proposed amendments to the Otay Ranch Village 2 Planned Community District Regulations and Land Use District Map are consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan. The residential nature of the proposed use would be consistent with the adopted low medium-density residential designation for this project site and compatible with the surrounding residential and open space land uses of the Otay Ranch area. B. APPROVAL OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS The City Council approves the amendments to the Otay Ranch Village 2 Planned Community District Regulations and Land Use District Map as represented in Exhibit B and Attachment 9. III. EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day from and after its adoption. Presented by Gary Halbert, AICP, PE Assistant City Manager/Director of Development Services 14-119 EXHIBIT A 14-120 Village of Montecito & Otay Ranch Business Pazl: Utay Ranch Planned Crnnlnunity Disxrict Regulations Zoniltig Distract Mai Nole: Fa Lath 119a ABamaliva P-19 ahflnpes m 9.6 acres enE 195 DDs srw R15 cnanpes l0 52 Btt9a arW 3] lob. LarM USe temaln6 the same aFx Sagkfim//y1 ® S/~g4firw/y9 SF9 SJ~gkfeu/y 4 RM1 M/n fMYly/ RMZ M«7, fam!/yE 0/M CPF r.MrMW/y /M'`VH'frGN/r © Cam~B.tr/eJ Mu MJnvUrr BFt 85YJallj /.sM BIK BN/nslf ~WR Exhibit B Exhibit I Village of Montecito and Otay Ranch Business Park Zoning Disv-ict Map s ~ 4_1 21 Amended December 20, ?011 Monterito C",~ Omy Rands. Bvsinus Pm k Sectioncl Omy Pwmch Villages Two, Three and a Portion o} A~~ect Plan ars ~? R-li AER/Lt9bMK lAgrOrMAf av-1 NoRh V 50d IWD' M616IIBiW16 $~ Lxfitinn6 $I101YI1 ere Apyotlmete. - qy Rr~eL ~~ R-p ~ ~ iKM~Ga' . ~ ~ ~ ~. i T S R!0 l.~.6 _ i _~~ /) -~: R o RwI R,fl i~/ - R-7 R-9d F•6 67 ~ R- - R-N ~~-. 6 s R H ~l R R~ ~ r FCC R-IF R,Fd Rol ~-. _ OS ~ o R-Wd ~~ ~ ~ ~ l R-i7 R-J9 ' R-YJJI ~- ~ ~ . R~ _ . ~ 4 N 3/~ '- ~ R-fR vd ~ ' ieLSrut ~ ' ~ ~ ~ /.. i ~ 'ems ~ ~ fwMSIdrN1rflri /~,•/' t ,• ~ i qp-) R-H R47 ~. i ../°/ Ndprl' Note: M bouMVy htl~6een th fiLIU pYttle 6114 tlw eOleoent MF pY6eY m9' pa eQutl66 Luflip Ills ueebn W616N rioau 60 m ^ nribNnn a zt9 eaa of a6mdnetlC end MU mrud lent LEGEND R Residential S School P Park CPF Community Purpose Facility OS Open Space C Commercial PD Public/Quasi-Public Exhibit C Exhibit 10a Montecito Site Utilization Plan II30 4n~ended December 20, 2011 14-122 Montecito ~ Otay Ranch Business Pm~k Sectional Planting Area Pkxn Otay Rnnclt Villages Two, Three and a Purdolx of Fotdr II-bevel LANp USE SUMMARY N¢Ighborhootl Acreag¢ DUS Nelghborhootl Lantl Use Acreage DUs Use Density Single Family Commercial RR=da SF 711 F2 ?$ C-1 Corrrnercial 415 160 3.9 17.9 R-bh ,$~F 24.4 8~ $,$ Subtotal ~].¢ 11.9 R-7 SP 9.4 44 4.7 Indusdlal RR=9a ~ 75 48 fL4 IN0.1 Induslfial ~ 100 50 51 51S R_9o ~ 7 1 56 1y IND-2 Intlusldal 13.3 101 7.8 6.7 R-15 SF rit 'ii fit IND3 Industrial 13.1 L2 45 63 - 29.7 R-1 Ba SF 17.1 65 59 Subtotal 94.5 11.8 5.6 67.9 R-16b SF 171 48 ~ Note: IntlusUial parcels maybe developed as resitlential and CPF uses 104 44 subjed to Nture enNronmenlel review and SPA P olicies erd R-19 SF 70.8 83 77 Reauuements. eflerlantlfill operations cease al R-20 SF 185 75 38 Ue Olay LanCfill. 193 83 4.3 R-21 SF 218 64 29 Pafk 22.2 R-23 SF 735 49 ~ P-t Town Square 1.4 131 71 5.4 Pafk R-24 SF ~ 7a ~ P-2 Park 7.1 76 41 54 R-25a SF 45 21 5.3 P-3 Park 8.9 R-25b SF ~ 24 33 P-4 Pafk 446 9 5 88 7.2 44.2 Subtotal 176.6 774 44 Subtotal gO.Q '198.7 986 5.0 59.6 CPF' MuItFFamlly CPF-1 CPF L2 R-S MF 15.7 730 83 CPF-2 CPF 09 R-6 MF 12.6 ~ 100 CPF-3 CPF it 83 S 0 RR=9b MF 24 30 125 CPF-4 CPF i5 RR=Ob MF ~ 69 100 CPF-5 CPF 0.8 R-10 MF 45 R5 7~s Subtotal 6.1 90 20.0 R-11 MF 2 ~ 14 B 9 9 14d 14.5 R-12 MF 23~ 325 7~ Other 24.0 295 72.3 R-13 MF 14.? L 13 Si Schad 103 103 749 74.5 R-16 MF 9.1 165 181 Open Space OS 125.1 78 737 780 1645 R-i6 MF L Z3 2~ Preserve OS 151 3.5 74 21.1 74.7 R-17 MF L 779 68 Fuure Developmant Future ~.1 71.5 70.3 Lot Development R-26 MF 2 75 ~ EM. Circulation 262 88 8.5 R-27 MF 75 50 80 Int. Cicula8on dz.6 88 110 72.5 R-28 MF `32 46 e~ Subtotal 312.4 59 85 744 378.3 R-29 MF 59 89 15 ]- Total ~Q 2788 8 8 152 17.1 818.9 R-30 MF 1(1.3 1J,~ 270 10.2 180 17.8 Subtotal 750.0 1 952 13.0 *An atltldionel3 0 to 5.0 acre CPF site will be provided vAttln 129.6 1,740 13.4 the U~Ilage Core Pursuant to a subsequent SPA Amendment M ixetl Use Mil, Mu >~ 10 9 Blue =SCR/Clerical Update Mu-z Mu za ,z s6 Pink =Proposed Amendment %a fi.s MlL MU 43 38 68 Subtotal 85 60 L Exhibit C 68 Exhibit 10b Montecito Site Utilization Plan I[-3 i 1 4-1 23 Amended December 2Q ?011 RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CHULA VISTA APPROVING MAP WITHIN OTAY RANCH TRACT 11-02 COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION VILLAGE 2 -CHULA VISTA L RECITALS 1. Project Site WHEREAS, the parcel, that is the subject matter of this resolution, is represented in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and for the purpose of general description is located in the western portion of Otay Ranch Village 2 Neighborhood R- 4B, Chula Vista ("Property"); and 2. Project; Applications for Discretionary Approval WHEREAS, on April 5, 2011, a duly verified application for a Tentative Subdivision Map (Chula Vista Tract (CVT) 11-02) was filed with the City of Chula Vista Development Services Department by Baldwin & Sons ("Applicant") to subdivide an approximate 48-acre site within Otay Ranch Village 2 Neighborhood R-4B in order to reduce the number of single-family lots from ninety-eight (98) to sixty-eight (68) and to provide two (2) open space lots and ten (10) neighborhood open space lots ("Project"); and 3. Environmental Determination WHEREAS, The Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project was covered in previously adopted Final Second Tier Environmental Impact Report for the Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, (FEIR 02-02). The Development Services Director has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the Development Service Director has prepared an addendum to this document, FEIR 02-02. No further environmental review is necessary; and 4. Planning Commission Record on Application WHEREAS, on January 11, 2012, the Director of Development Services set a hearing before the Planning Commission for the consideration of and recommendation on Tentative Subdivision Map. Notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by both publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City and mailing to property owners and 14-124 City Council Resolution No. Page 2 residents within 500 feet of the exterior boundazies of the Property at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, a hearing at the time and place as advertised, namely January 11, 2012, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, was held before the Planning Commission, and said hearing was thereafter closed; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the Tentative Subdivision Map CVT 11-02; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after considering all evidence and testimony presented, recommended by a vote of 6-0-1 that the City of Chula Vista City Council approve the Tentative Subdivision Map CVT 11-02 within Otay Ranch Village 2 Neighborhood R-4B; and 5. City Council Record on Application WHEREAS, a hearing time and place was set by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista for consideration of the Project, and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by both publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City and mailing to property owners and residents within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, on January 24, 2012 at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, located at 276 Fourth Avenue, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista held the duly noticed public hearing to consider said Project: said hearing was thereafter closed. NQW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows: II. TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FINDINGS A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66473.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, the City Council finds that the Tentative Subdivision Map, as conditioned herein, is in conformance with the elements of the City's General Plan, based on the following: 1. Land Use and Transportation The General Plan land use designation is Low Medium Density Residential (3-6 DU/AC). The proposed implementing zone is SF2 Single-Family Residential, which was amended through the SPA Plan Amendment (PCM-11-06). The proposed changes result in decreased density, from 4.0 DU/AC to 2.7 DU/AC. Single family lots will range from 8,650 sf to 19,352 sf in size. 14-125 City Council Resolution No. Page 3 All off-site public streets required to serve the subdivision already exist or will be constructed or paid for by the Applicant in accordance with the Conditions of Approval. The on-site public streets are designed in accordance with the City design standards and/or requirements and provide for vehicular and pedestrian connections. 2. Economic Development The Project, when considered in conjunction with Tentative Maps CVT 11-03, 11-04, and 11-05, results in a net zero increase in units within Village 2, while providing a previously unavailable, single-family, small lot product in a more compact format, which will be located within walking distance of the village core. The four and six- unit, compact products support economic policies regarding the pursuit and provision of diverse housing types and costs in order to provide balance for housing opportunities as well as jobs. These compact, clustered, single-family products provide a wider range of housing options and pricing for potential home-buyers in the current housing market. By reallocating 1l3 units and increasing densities close to the village core, it can be anticipated that there will be increased patronage to the nearby commercial and public/quasi-public uses, which increase will contribute to greater economic development within Village 2 and the City. The Project allows the development of detached, small lot, single-family homes on separate, fee-simple lots. This housing type is reflective of greater demand for these products in today's economic environment. The four- and six- unit cluster design, around a central auto/activity court, provides a housing type that is new to Village 2 and specifically designed to align with today's marketplace and economic conditions. The Project provides home-buyers the opportunity to purchase detached, single- family homes with greater affordability and reduced maintenance costs. As a new housing type within Otay Ranch, the proposed homes also provide further variation in housing opportunities available to Chula Vista residents, consistent with General Plan Objective ED 2. The proposed project also fosters economic development at the community level by providing for increased housing densities within the 'same footprint. These increased densities allow for infrastructure and municipal services to be provided at reduced cost per capita (more people served by the same municipal services). Additionally, with increased housing (and population) within the same footprint; increased densities improve the viability of community serving commercial and public/quasi public uses as well as alternative transportation modes. As a result, the proposed project may serve as a catalyst for small and mid-sized industries and businesses and community-serving and neighborhood uses, consistent with Objective ED 3 and ED 9. 3. Public Facilities and Services/Drainage and Water Ouality The Project has been conditioned to ensure that all necessary public facilities and services will be available to serve the Project contemporaneous with the demand for those services. A Public Facilities Financing Plan has been prepared to supplement 14-126 City Council Resolution No. Page 4 that which is already in place to define public service, facility, and phasing needs created by the Project. Project-level water quality technical reports were completed for the proposed project. The water quality technical reports outline three options for achieving the water quality treatment and hydromodification requirements of the City of Chula Vista. One of the three options would be implemented and approved by the City Engineer. The proposed unit transfers would continue to comply with all applicable rules and regulations, including compliance with NPDES permit requirements for urban runoff and storm water discharge. Best Management Practices (BMPs) for design, treatment and monitoring for storm water quality would be implemented as delineated in the EIR with respect to municipal and construction permits. Compliance with all applicable rules and regulations governing water quality as well as implementation of all mitigation measures outlined in Section 5.9 of the EIR and the measures outlined in the water quality technical reports (Hunsaker and Associates 2011a,b) would ensure no additional impacts to water quality beyond those previously analyzed. Project-specific analyses have been conducted relative to the project's potential sewer and water impacts. The proposed project would reduce average projected water demands by 38,800 gallons per day (gpd). This reduction is due to an increase in density (greater than 8 units per acre), resulting in a reduced water demand per unit. As such, the water system recommendations from the May 2006 Subarea Master Plan for Village 2 remain unchanged as a result of this project. Additionally, while the total projected sewage flows will not change as a result of the proposed project, the project does involve shifting 83 units from the Wolf Canyon Basin to the Poggi Basin, which results in a shift of 21,995 gpd from the Wolf Canyon Basin to the Poggi Basin. The proposed project, however, would not require additional reaches of the Poggi Canyon Interceptor to be upgraded in the future. Upon approval of the proposed project, the Development Impact Fee for the Poggi Basin would be updated to reflect the additional units. 4. Environmental Element The project has been reviewed in accordance with the requirements of CEQA. An Addendum has been prepared for the project in order to address the proposed modifications to the lot configurations within Village Two from the adopted Final Second Tier Environmental Impact Report, Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, FEIR 02-02. The proposed modifications would not result in an increase in overall unit count, and would not substantially change traffic generation or distribution patterns. No additional significant impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the EIR, or substantial increases in any identified significant impacts are anticipated; however, the proposed modification represents new information that was not available at the time that the EIR was certified. Therefore, the Addendum and the Mitigation 14-127 City Council Resolution No. Page 5 Monitoring Program ensures that all environmental impacts will be mitigated to a level less than significant. 5. Growth Management Due to the Project's `no net change to number of dwelling units', the surrounding street segments and intersections as planned or built, including Olympic Pazkway and Santa Victoria Road, will continue to operate/serve at the same Level of Service in compliance with the City's traffic threshold standazd with the proposed project traffic No adverse impact to the City's traffic threshold standards would occur as a result of the proposed project. The Project site is located in the attendance area of Hedenkamp Elementary School, within the boundaries of the Chula Vista Elementary School District. The Project is also within the attendance area of Otay Ranch High School and Olympian High School, within the Sweetwater Union High School District. The Applicant will be required to pay applicable developer fees based upon assessable area. 6. Open Space and Conservation The project proposes single-family homes that meet the minimum open space requirement per the Otay Ranch Village 2 SPA. The project would also be required to provide pazkland or pay park fees towards the acquisition and development of future parks. The proposed landform grading conforms to the City's grading Ordinance and retains regional and natural open space features. The development of the site is consistent with the goals and policies of the Conservation Element. B. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66473.1 of the Subdivision Map Act, the configuration, orientation, and topography of the site allow for the optimum siting of lots for natural and passive heating and cooling opportunities. The development of the site will be subject to site plan and architectural review to ensure the maximum utilization of natural and passive heating and cooling opportunities. C. Pursuant to Government Code Section 664] 2.3 of the Subdivision Map Act, the Council certifies that it has considered the effect of this approval on the housing needs of the region and has balanced those needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City and the available fiscal and environmental resources. D. The site is physically suited for residential development, because it is generally level and is located adjacent to existing residential developments. The Project conforms to all standards established by the City for a residential development. E. The conditions herein imposed on the grant of permit or other entitlement herein contained is approximately proportional both in nature and extent to the impact created by the proposed development. 14-128 City Council Resolution No. Page 6 IIL GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66020 NOTICE Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d)(1), NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 90 day period to protest the imposition of any impact fee, dedication, reservation, or other exaction described in this resolution begins on the effective date of this resolution and any such protest must be in a manner that complies with Section 66020(a) and failure to follow timely this procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, set aside, void or annual imposition. The right to protest the fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions does not apply to planning, zoning, grading, or other similar application processing fees or service fees in connection with the project; and it does not apply to any fees, dedication, reservations, or other exactions which have been given notice similar to this, nor does it revive challenges to any fees for which the Statute of Limitations has previously expired. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby approve the Project subject to the general and special conditions set forth below. IV. TENTATIVE MAP GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL A. Project Site is improved with Project The Applicant, or his/her successors in interest and assigns, shall improve the Project Site with the Project as described in the Tentative Subdivision Map, known Chula Vista Tract 11-02. V. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL A. The conditions herein imposed on the tentative map approval herein contained are approximately proportional both to nature and extent of impact created by the proposed development. Unless otherwise specified, all conditions and code requirements listed below shall be fully completed by the Applicant or successor-in-interest to the City's satisfaction prior to approval of the Final Map, unless otherwise specified. Planning Division: 1. Applicant shall develop and maintain the Project Site in accordance with the approved plans, which include site plans, floor plan, and elevation plan on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and Title 19. 2. Prior to, or in conjunction with the issuance of the first building permit, pay all applicable fees, including any unpaid balances of permit processing fees for the Project under deposit account DQ-1652. 14-129 City Council Resolution No. Page 7 Land Development Division: 3. All of the terms, covenants and conditions contained herein shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of the Developer as to any or all of the Property. For purposes of this document the term "Developer" shall also mean "Applicant". 4. All of the terms, covenants and conditions contained within the Tentative Map for Tract No. 06-OS shall continue to be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of the Developer as to any or all of the Property. 5. All of the terms, covenants and conditions contained within the Amendment to the City of Chula Vista Subdivision Manual for the inclusion of the Standard Conditions of Approval for Tentative Maps shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of the Developer as to any or all of the Property. 6. Developer shall provide one sewer lateral for each unit and all shall be shown on the improvement plans as directed by the City Engineer. 7. Prior to approval of any final map for the Project, Developer shall secure and construct all offsite facilities as identified in the Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP). Developer shall submit security in a form approved by the City Attorney, for any required offsite improvements as shown on the approved Tentative Map or as required by the PFFP. Any offsite permission or right of way that will be required to install such improvements shall be obtained prior to the approval of any final map, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 8. Prior to the approval of any final map within the Project, Developer shall obtain approval of a Joint Use Agreement and Right of Way crossings for Santa Victoria and Santa Diana over the City of San Diego waterline to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 9. Developer shall ensure that the Homeowners Association (HOA) maintains all Water Quality Facilities for the Project. Prior to final map approval, the Developer shall obtain the approval from the City Engineer, of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's). Developer shall also demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director that such maintenance is accounted for in the HOA annual budget. 10. Prior to approval of any building permit for the Project, Developer shall obtain approval, by the City of Chula Vista, of the `landscape documentation package' that demonstrates that the landscape associated with this Project complies with the City of Chula Vista Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance, Chapter 20.12 of the Municipal Code. The title sheet of the drawings shall contain a signed statement from the landscape architect as follows: "I am familiar with and agree to comply with the requirements for landscape improvement plans as described in Chapter 20.12 of the Municipal Code. I have 14-130 City Council Resolution No. Page 8 prepared this plan in compliance with those regulations. I certify that the plan implements the regulations to provide efficient landscape water use." 11. Sidewalks immediately adjacent to any low walls shall have a band of scoring to alert pedestrians to the proximity to the wall. The scoring shall be located along the base of the wall and may contain vine-planting pockets. The scoring pattern, the size of the band, and any of its features thereof, including vine-planting pockets, shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 12. All existing and proposed perimeter theme walls and fences shall be part of the landscape and irrigation plans for the Project. The landscape and irrigation plans shall show design, height and materials for the walls/fences. 13. Ensure that prospective purchasers receive a copy of the City of Chula Vista Landscape Water Conservation Checklist. 14. Prior to the issuance of the first occupancy permit for a unit within a neighborhood included in the Final Map and abutting open space, the Developer shall install slope Landscape and Irrigation in accordance with the approved L&I plans in all open space areas immediately adjacent to that neighborhood. The installation shall be coordinated with owners of adjacent neighborhoods when necessary. Fire Department: 15. The building permit plans shall demonstrate a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute (gpm) fora 2-hour duration (at 20psi). The 1,500 gpm is for homes that are less than 3,600 square feet. For larger homes (3,601 +), they shall meet the fire flow requirements, based upon size and construction type, as stated within the adopted fire code. 16. The Applicant shall provide a water flow letter from the applicable water agency having jurisdiction, to the Chula Vista Fire Department, indicating that the fire flow is available to serve this project. 17. The Applicant shall install Fire Hydrants located not greater than 500 feet apart for single-family and 300 feet apart for multi-family properties. The minimum fire hydrant size shall be: 6" x 4" x 2" '/z x 2 Y2" prior to occupancy. 18. Prior to occupancy, the structure shall be addressed in accordance with the currently adopted code. 19. The Applicant shall comply with the adopted State of California Building Code changes that require all new one and two-family homes and townhouses built in the state, to be equipped with life-saving fire sprinkler systems. B. The following on-going conditions shall apply to the Project Site as long as it relies on this approval: 14-131 City Council Resolution No. Page 9 20. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the CVMC, and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 21. The Property Owner and Applicant shall and do agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City, its City Council members, officers, employees and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and atoorney's fees (collectively, liabilities) incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectly, from (a) City's approval of this tentative map and (b) City's approval or issuance of any other permit or action, whether discretionary or non- discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated on the Project Site. The Property Owner and Applicant shall acknowledge their agreement to this provision by executing a copy of this Tentative Subdivision Map where indicated below. The Property Owner's and Applicant's compliance with this provision shall be binding on any and all of the Property Owner's and Applicant's successors and assigns. 22. All of the terms, covenants and conditions contained herein shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of the Developer as to any or all of the Property. For purposes of this document the term "Developer" shall also mean "Applicant". 23. The Applicant shall comply with all requirements and guidelines of the City of Chula Vista General Plan; the City's Growth Management Ordinance; Chula Vista Landscape Manual, Chula Design Plan; Otay Ranch General Development Plan, Otay Ranch Resource Management Plan, Phase 1 and Phase 2; Ranch Wide Affordable Housing Plan; Otay Ranch Overall Design Plan; Otay Ranch Village Two Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and supporting documents including: Village Two Public Facilities Finance Plan; Village Two Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Trails Plan; Village Two SPA Affordable Housing Plan and the Non-Renewable Energy Conservation Plan as amended from time to time, unless specifically modified by the appropriate department head, with the approval of the City Manager. These plans may be subject to minor modifications by the appropriate department head, with the approval of the City Manager, however, any material modifications shall be subject to approval by the City Council. 24. If any of the terms, covenants or conditions contained herein shall fail to occur or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, including issuance of building permits; deny, or further condition the subsequent approvals that are derived from the approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions and/or seek damages for their violation. The applicant shall be notified 10 days in advance prior to any of the above actions being taken by the City and shall be given the opportunity to remedy any deficiencies identified by the City. 25. Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City harmless from and against any and all claims, liabilities and costs, including attorney's fees, arising from challenges 14-132 City Council Resolution No. Page 10 to the Environmental Impact Report and subsequent environmental review for the Project and any or all entitlements and approvals issued by the City in connection with the Project. 26. The applicant shall comply with all applicable Village Two SPA conditions of approval, (PCM 11-06) as may be amended from time to time. VI. EXECUTION AND RECORDATION OF RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL The Property Owner and Applicant shall execute this document signing on the lines provided below, indicating that the Property Owner and Applicant have each read, understood and agreed to the conditions contained herein, and will implement same. Upon execution, this document shall be recorded with the County Recorder of the County of San Diego, at the sole expense of the Property Owner and/or Applicant, and a signed, stamped copy returned to the City's Development Services Department. Failure to return the signed and stamped copy of this recorded document within 10 days of recordation shall indicate the Property Owner/Applicant's desire that the project, and the corresponding application for building permits and/or a business license, be held in abeyance without approval. Signature of Property Owner Date Signature of Applicant Date VIL CONFORMANCE WITH CITY SUBDIVISION MANUAL The City Council does hereby find that the Project is in conformance with the City of Chula Vista Subdivision Manual, Section 18.12 and the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. VIII. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon the enforceability of each and every term, provision, and condition herein stated; and that in the event that any one or more terms, provisions, or conditions are determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, this resolution, the map approved hereunder, and any permit issued in reliance hereon shall be deemed to be automatically revoked and of no further force and effect ab initio. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chula Vista City Council does hereby approve Tentative Subdivision Map CVT-11-02, subject to conditions listed above, to subdivide 48 acre site within Otay Ranch Village 2 Neighborhood R-4B in order to amend the number of single- family lots from ninety-eight (98) lots to sixty-eight (68) lots and provide two (2) open space lots and ten (10) neighborhood open space lots. 14-133 City Council Resolution No. Page 11 Presented by: Gary Halbert, P.E., AICP Assistant City Manager/ Development Services Director 14-134 EXHIBIT "A" CVT 11-02 aPy / QPP~` Q~G Off'. i SA-`RR~RIA R~• 14-135 RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CHULA VISTA APPROVING MAP WITHIN OTAY RANCH TRACT 11-03 COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION VILLAGE 2 -CHULA VISTA I. RECITALS 1. Project Site WHEREAS, the parcel, that is the subject matter of this resolution, is represented in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and for the purpose of general description is located in the southern portion of Otay Ranch Village 2 Neighborhood R-20, R-23, R-24, R-25A, R25B, R-27 Chula Vista ("Property"); and 2. Project; Applications for Discretionazy Approval WHEREAS, on April 5, 2011, a duly verified application for a Tentative Subdivision Map (Chula Vista Tract (CVT) 11-03) was filed with the City of Chula Vista Development Services Department by Baldwin & Sons ("Applicant") to subdivide a 57.9-acre site of an approximate ]66.76 acre site within Otay Ranch Village 2 Neighborhood R-20, R-23, R-24, R-25A, R-25B, R-27, reducing the number of single-family lots from two hundred sixty three (263) to one hundred ninety nine (199) and the multi-family units from eighty (80) to sixty one (61). The map would also provide thirty eight (38) neighborhood open space lots on the 57.9 acre site ("Project"); and 3. Environmental Determination WHEREAS, The Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project was covered in previously adopted Final Second Tier Environmental Impact Report for Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, (FEIR 02-02). The Development Services Director has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the Development Service Director has prepared an addendum to this document, FEIR 02-02. No further environmental review is necessary; and 4. Planning Commission Record on Application WHEREAS, on January 11, 2012, the Director of Development Services set a heazing before the Planning Commission for the consideration of and recommendation on Tentative Subdivision Map. Notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by both 14-136 City Council Resolution No. Page 2 publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City and mailing to property owners and residents within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the Property at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, a hearing at the time and place as advertised, namely January 11, 2012, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, was held before the Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the Tentative Subdivision Map CVT 11-03; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission after considering all evidence and testimony presented recommended by a vote of 6-0-1 that the City of Chula Vista City Council approve the Tentative Subdivision Map CVT 11-03 within Otay Ranch Village 2 Neighborhood R-20, R-23, R-24, R-25A, R-25B, R-27; and 5. City Council Record on Application WHEREAS, a hearing time and place was set by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista for consideration of the Project and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by both publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City and mailing to property owners and residents within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, on January 24, 2012 at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista held the duly noticed public hearing to consider said Project: said hearing was thereafter closed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows: II. TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FINDINGS A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66473.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, the City Council finds that the Tentative Subdivision Map, as conditioned herein, is in conformance with the elements of the City's General Plan, based on the following: 1. Land Use and Transportation The General Plan land use designation for the project area is Low Medium Density Residential (3-6 DU/AC). The implementing zones are SF3 and SF4 Residential, which allow minimum lot area of 4,000 square feet and 3,000 square feet, respectively, and average lot area of 5,000 and 3,800 square feet, respectively. The proposed. R-20, R-23, R-24, R-25a, R-25b, and R-27 neighborhoods will be developed with residential lots at a density of 3.9 DU/AC, with lots at minimum and 14-137 City Council Resolution No. Page 3 average sizes that are within the allowable density, lot size, and permitted number of dwelling units. All off-site public streets required to serve the subdivision already exist or will be constructed or paid for by the Applicant in accordance with the Conditions of Approval. The on-site public streets are designed in accordance with the City design standards and/or requirements and provide for vehicular and pedestrian connections. 2. Economic Development The Project, when considered in conjunction with CVT 11-02, 11-04, and 11-05, results in a net zero increase in units ~~ithin Village 2, while providing a previously unavailable, single family, small lot product in a more compact format, which will be located within walking distance of the village core. The four and six-unit compact products support economic policies regarding the pursuit and provision of diverse housing types and costs in order to provide balance for housing opportunities as well as jobs. These compact clustered single family products provide a wider range of housing options and pricing for potential home-buyers in the current housing market. By reallocating 113 units and increasing densities close to the village core, it can be anticipated that there will be increased patronage to the nearby commercial and public/quasi-public uses, which increase will contribute to greater economic development within Village 2 and the City. The Project allows the development of detached small lot single-family homes on separate, fee-simple lots. This housing type is reflective of greater demand for these products in today's economic environment. The four- and six- unit cluster design, around a central auto/activity court provide a housing type that is new to Village 2, and specifically designed to align with today's marketplace and economic conditions. The Project provides home-buyers the opportunity to purchase detached, single- family homes with greater affordability, reduced maintenance/utility costs, and less dependency on the automobile. As a new housing type within Otay Ranch, the proposed homes also provide further variation in housing opportunities available to Chula Vista residents, consistent with General Plan Objective ED 2. The proposed project also fosters economic development at the community level by providing for increased housing densities within the same footprint. These increased densities allow for infrastructure and municipal services to be provided at reduced cost per capita (more people served by the same municipal services). Additionally, with increased housing (and population) within the same footprint, increased densities improve the viability of community serving commercial and public/quasi public uses as well as alternative transportation modes. As a result, the proposed project may serve as a catalyst for small and mid-sized industries and businesses and community-serving and neighborhood uses, consistent with Objective ED 3 and ED 9. 14-138 City Council Resolution No. Page 4 3. Public Facilities and Services/Drainage and Water Ouality The Project has been conditioned to ensure that all necessary public facilities and services will be available to serve the Project contemporaneous with the demand for those services. A Public Facilities Financing Plan has been prepared to supplement that which is already in place to define public service, facility, and phasing needs created by the Project. Project-level water quality technical reports were completed for the proposed project. The water quality technical reports outline three options for achieving the water quality treatment and hydromodification requirements of the City of Chula Vista. One of the three options would be implemented and approved by the City Engineer. The proposed unit transfers would continue to comply with all applicable rules and regulations including compliance with NPDES permit requirements for urban runoff and storm water discharge. Best Management Practices (BMPs) for design, treatment and monitoring for storm water quality would be implemented as delineated in the EIR with respect to municipal and construction permits. Compliance with all applicable rules and regulations governing water quality as well as implementation of all mitigation measures outlined in Section 5.9 of the EIR and the measures outlined in the water quality technical reports (Hunsaker and Associates 2011a,b) would ensure no additional impacts to water quality beyond those previously analyzed. Project-specific analyses have been conducted relative to the project's potential sewer and water impacts. The proposed project would reduce average projected water demands by 38,800 gallons per day (gpd). This reduction is due to an increase in density (greater than 8 units per acre), resulting in a reduced water demand per unit. As such, the water system recommendations from the May 2006 Subarea Master Plan for Village 2 remain unchanged as a result of this project. Additionally, while the total projected sewage flows will not change as a result of the proposed project, the project does involve shifting 83 units from the Wolf Canyon Basin to the Poggi Basin, which results in a shift of 21,995 gpd from the Wolf Canyon Basin to the Poggi Basin. The proposed project, however, would not require additional reaches of the Poggi Canyon Interceptor to be upgraded in the future. Upon approval of the proposed project, the Development Impact Fee for the Poggi Basin would be updated to reflect the additional units. 4. Environmental Element The Project has been reviewed in accordance with the requirements of CEQA. An Addendum has been prepared for the project in order to address the proposed modifications to the lot configurations within Village Two from the adopted Final Second Tier Environmental Impact Report, Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, FEIR 02-02. The proposed modifications would not result in an increase in overall unit count, and would not substantially change traffic generation or distribution patterns. No 14-139 City Council Resolution No. Page 5 additional significant impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the EIR, or substantial increases in any identified significant impacts are anticipated; however, the proposed modification represents new information that was not available at the time that the EIR was certified. Therefore, the Addendum and the Mitigation Monitoring Program ensures that all environmental impacts will be mitigated to a level less than significant. 5. Growth Mana eg ment Due to the Project's `no net change to number of dwelling units', the surrounding street segments and intersections as planned or built, including Olympic Parkway and Santa Victoria Road, will continue to operate/serve at the same Level of Service in compliance with the City's traffic threshold standard with the proposed project traffic. No adverse impact to the City's traffic threshold standards would occur as a result of the proposed project. The Project site is located in the attendance area of Hedenkamp Elementary School, within the boundaries of the Chula Vista Elementary School District. The Project is also within the attendance area of Otay Ranch High School and Olympian High School, within the Sweetwater Union High School District. The Applicant will be required to pay applicable developer fees based upon assessable area. 6. Open Space and Conservation The project proposes single-family homes that meet the minimum open space requirement per the Otay Ranch Village 2 SPA. The project would also be required to provide parkland or pay pazk fees towards the acquisition and development of future parks. The proposed landform grading conforms to the City's grading Ordinance and retains regional and natural open space features. The development of the site is consistent with the goals and policies of the Conservation Element. B. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66473.1 of the Subdivision Map Act, the configuration, orientation, and topography of the site allow for the optimum siting of lots for natural and passive heating and cooling opportunities. The development of the site will be subject to site plan and architectural review to ensure the maximum utilization of natural and passive heating and cooling opportunities. C. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66412.3 of the Subdivision Map Act, the Council certifies that it has considered the effect of this approval on the housing needs of the region and has balanced those needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City and the available fiscal and environmental resources. D. The site is physically suited for residential development because it is generally level and is located adjacent to existing residential developments. The Project conforms to all standards established by the City for a residential development. 14-140 City Council Resolution No. Page 6 E. The conditions herein imposed on the grant of permit or other entitlement herein contained is approximately proportional both in nature and extent to the impact created by the proposed development. III. GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66020 NOTICE Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d)(1), NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 90 day period to protest the imposition of any impact fee, dedication, reservation, or other exaction described in this resolution begins on the effective date of this resolution and any such protest must be in a manner that complies with Section 66020(a) and failure to follow timely this procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, set aside, void or annual imposition. The right to protest the fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions does not apply to planning, zoning, grading, or other similar application processing fees or service fees in connection with the project; and it does not apply to any fees, dedication, reservations, or other exactions which have been given notice similar to this, nor does it revive challenges to any fees for which the Statute of Limitations has previously expired. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby approve the Project subject to the general and special conditions set forth below. IV. TENTATIVE MAP GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL A. Project Site is improved with Project The Applicant, or his/her successors in interest and assigns, shall improve the Project Site with the Project as described in the Tentative Subdivision Map, known Chula Vista Tract 11-03. V. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL A. The conditions herein imposed on the tentative map approval herein contained are approximately proportional both to nature and extent of impact created by the proposed development. Unless otherwise specified, all conditions and code requirements listed below shall be fully completed by the Applicant or successor-in-interest to the City's satisfaction prior to approval of the Final Map, unless otherwise specified: Planning Division: 1. Applicant shall develop and maintain the Project Site in accordance with the approved plans, which include site plans, floor plan, and elevation plan on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and Title 19. 14-141 City Council Resolution No. Page 7 2. Prior to, or in conjunction with the issuance of the first building permit, pay all applicable fees, including any unpaid balances of permit processing fees for the Project under deposit account DQ-1652. Land Development Division: 3. All of the terms, covenants and conditions contained herein shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of the Developer as to any or all of the Property. For purposes of this document the term "Developer" shall also mean "Applicant". 4. All of the terms, covenants and conditions contained within the Tentative Map for Tract No. 06-OS shall continue to be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of the Developer as to any or all of the Property. 5. All of the terms, covenants and conditions contained within the Amendment to the City of Chula Vista Subdivision Manual Section 5-000 for the inclusion of the Standard Conditions of Approval for Tentative Maps shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of the Developer as to any or all of the Property. 6. Developer shall provide one sewer lateral for each unit and all shall be shown on the improvement plans as directed by the City Engineer. 7. Prior to approval of any final map for the Project, Developer shall secure and construct all offsite facilities as identified in the Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP). Developer shall submit security in a form approved by the City Attorney, for any required offsite improvements as shown on the approved Tentative Map or as required by the PFFP. Any offsite permission or right of way that will be required to install such improvements shall be obtained prior to the approval of any final map, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 8. Prior to the approval of any final map within the Project, Developer shall obtain approval of a Joint Use Agreement and Right of Way crossings for Santa Victoria and Santa Diana over the City of San Diego waterline to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 9. Developer shall insure that the Homeowners Association (HOA) maintains all Water Quality Facilities for the Project. Prior to final map approval, the Developer shall obtain the approval from the City Engineer, of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's). Developer shall also demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director that such maintenance is accounted for in the HOA annual budget. 10. Prior to approval of any building permit for the Project, Developer shall obtain approval, by the City of Chula Vista, of the `landscape documentation package' that demonstrates that the landscape associated with this Project complies with the City of Chula Vista 14-142 City Council Resolution No. Page 8 Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance, Chapter 20.12 of the Municipal Code. The title sheet of the drawings shall contain a signed statement from the landscape architect as follows: "I am familiar with and agree to comply with the requirements for landscape improvement plans as described in Chapter 20.12 of the Municipal Code. I have prepared this plan in compliance with those regulations. I certify that the plan implements the regulations to provide efficient landscape water use." 11. Sidewalks immediately adjacent to any low walls shall have a band of scoring to alert pedestrians to the proximity to the wall. The scoring shall be located along the base of the wall and may contain vine-planting pockets. The scoring pattern, the size of the band, and any of its features thereof, including vine-planting pockets, shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 12. All existing and proposed perimeter theme walls and fences shall be part of the landscape and irrigation plans for the Project. The landscape and irrigation plans shall show design, height and materials for the walls/fences. 13. Ensure that prospective purchasers receive a copy of the City of Chula Vista Landscape Water Conservation Checklist. 14. Prior to the issuance of the first occupancy permit for a unit within a neighborhood included in the Final Map and abutting open space, the Developer shall install slope Landscape and Irrigation in accordance with the approved L&I plans in all open space areas immediately adjacent to that neighborhood. The installation shall be coordinated with owners of adjacent neighborhoods when necessary. Fire Department: 15. The Building Permit plans shall demonstrate a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute (gpm) fora 2-hour duration (at 20psi). The 1,500 gpm is for homes that are less than 3,600 square feet. For larger homes (3,601 +), they shall meet the fire flow requirements, based upon size and construction type, as stated within the adopted fire code. 16. The Applicant shall provide a water flow letter from the applicable water agency having jurisdiction, to the Chula Vista Fire Department, indicating that the fire flow is available to serve this project. 17. The Applicant shall install Fire Hydrants located not greater than 500 feet apart for single-family and 300 feet apart for multi-family properties. The minimum fire hydrant size shall be: 6" x 4" x 2" '/~ x 2 %" prior to occupancy. 18. Prior to occupancy, the structure shall be addressed in accordance with the currently adopted code. 19. The Applicant shall comply with the adopted State of California Building Code changes that require all new one and two-family homes and townhouses built in the state, to be equipped with life-saving fire sprinkler systems. 14-143 City Council Resolution No. Page 9 B. The following on-going conditions shall apply to the Project Site as long as it relies on this approval: 20. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the CVMC, and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 21. The Property Owner and Applicant shall and do agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold harm]ess City, its City Council members, officers, employees and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees (collectively, liabilities) incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this tentative map and (b) Citys approval or issuance of any other permit or action, whether discretionary or non-discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated on the Project Site. The Property Owner and Applicant shall acknowledge their agreement to this provision by executing a copy of this Tentative Subdivision Map where indicated below. The Property Owner's and Applicant's compliance with this provision shall be binding on any and all of the Property Owner's and Applicant's successors and assigns. 22. All of the terms, covenants and conditions contained herein shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of the Developer as to any or all of the Property. For purposes of this document the term "Developer" shall also mean "Applicant". 23. The Applicant shall comply with all requirements and guidelines of the City of Chula Vista General Plan; the City's Growth Management Ordinance; Chula Vista Landscape Manual, Chula Design Plan; Otay Ranch General Development Plan, Otay Ranch Resource Management Plan, Phase 1 and Phase 2; Ranch Wide Affordable Housing Plan; Otay Ranch Overall Design Plan; Otay Ranch Village Two Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and supporting documents including: Village Two Public Facilities Finance Plan; Village Two Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Trails Plan; Village Two SPA Affordable Housing Plan and the Non-Renewable Energy Conservation Plan as amended from time to time, unless specifically modified by the appropriate department head, with the approval of the City Manager. These plans may be subject to minor modifications by the appropriate department head, with the approval of the City Manager, however, any material modifications shall be subject to approval by the City Council. 24. If any of the terms, covenants or conditions contained herein shall fail to occur or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, including issuance of building permits: deny, or further condition the subsequent approvals that are derived from the approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions and/or seek damages for their violation. The applicant shall be notified 10 days in advance prior to any of the above actions being taken by the City and shall be given the opportunity to remedy any deficiencies identified by the City. 14-144 City Council Resolution No. Page 10 25. Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City harmless from and against any and all claims, liabilities and costs, including attorney's fees, arising from challenges to the Environmental Impact Report and subsequent environmental review for the Project and any or all entitlements and approvals issued by the City in connection with the Project. 26. The applicant shall comply with all applicable Village Two SPA conditions of approval, (PCM 11-06) as may be amended from time to time. VI. EXECUTION AND RECORDATION OF RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL The Property Owner and Applicant shall execute this document signing on the lines provided below, indicating that the Property Owner and Applicant have each read, understood and agreed to the conditions contained herein, and will implement same. Upon execution, this document shall be recorded with the County Recorder of the County of San Diego, at the sole expense of the Property Owner and/or Applicant, and a signed, stamped copy returned to the City's Development Services Department. Failure to return the signed and stamped copy of this recorded document within 10 days of recordation shall indicate the Property Owner/Applicant's desire that the project, and the corresponding application for building permits and/or a business license, be held in abeyance without approval. Signature of Property Owner Date Signature of Applicant Date VII. CONFORMANCE WITH CITY SUBDIVISION MANUAL The City Council does hereby find that the Project is in conformance with the City of Chula Vista Subdivision Manual, Section 18.12 and the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. VIII. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon the enforceability of each and every term, provision, and condition herein stated; and that in the event that any one or more terms, provisions, or conditions are determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, this resolution, the map approved hereunder, and any permit issued in reliance hereon shall be deemed to be automatically revoked and of no further force and effect ab initio. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chula Vista City Council does hereby approve Tentative Subdivision Map CVT 11-03, subject to conditions listed above to subdivide a 57.9 14-145 City Council Resolution No. Page I1 acre site within Otay Ranch Village 2 Neighborhood R-20, R-23, R-24, R-25A, R-25B, R-27 in order to amend the number of single-family lots from two hundred sixty three (263) to one hundred ninety nine (]99) and multi-family units from eighty (80) to sixty one (61) units. The map would also provide thirty eight (38) neighborhood open space lots on the assocrated site. Presented by: Gary Halbert, P.E., AICP Assistant City Manager/ Services Director Development as to R. Good Attorney 14-146 x m 9 D m A O D O EXHIBIT "A" CVT 11-03 gw- \ SP~P~~~!I~~CI\11 14-147 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP WITHIN OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 2 -CHULA VISTA TRACT 11-04 I. RECITALS 1. Project Site WHEREAS, the parcel, that is the subject matter of this resolution, is represented in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incozporated herein by this reference, and for the purpose of general description, is located in the northern portion of Otay Ranch Village 2 Neighborhood R-6, Chula Vista ("Property"); and 2. Project; Applications for Discretionary Approval WHEREAS, on Apri15, 2011, a duly verified application for a Tentative Subdivision Map (Chula Vista Tract (CVT) 11-04) was filed with the City of Chula Vista Development Services Department by Baldwin & Sons ("Applicant") to subdivide a 25.5-acre site within Otay Ranch Village 2, Neighborhood R-6, in order to increase the the number of single-family lots from sixty-three (63) to one hundred twenty six (126) single-family lots and to provide one (1) neighborhood open space lot ("Project"); and 3. Environmental Determination WHEREAS, The Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project was covered in previously adopted Final Second Tier Environmental Impact Report for the Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, (FEIR 02-02). The Development Services Director has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the Development Service Director has prepared an addendum to this document, FEIR 02-02. No further environmental review is necessary; and 4. Planning Commission Record on Application WHEREAS, on January 11, 2012, the Director of Development Services set a heazing before the Planning Commission for the consideration of and recommendation on Tentative Subdivision Map. Notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by both publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City and mailing to property owners and 14-148 City Council Resolution No. Page 2 residents within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the Property at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, a hearing at the time and place as advertised, namely January 11, 2012, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, was held before the Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the Tentative Subdivision Map CVT 11-04; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission after considering all evidence and testimony presented recommended by a vote of 6-0-1 that the City of Chula Vista City Council approve the Tentative Subdivision Map CVT ] 1-04 within Otay Ranch Village 2 Neighborhood R-6; and 5. City Council Record on Application WHEREAS, a hearing time and place was set by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista for consideration of the Project and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by both publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City and mailing to property owners and residents within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, on January 24, 2012 at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista held the duly noticed public hearing to consider said Project: said hearing was thereafter closed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby find, deterniine, and resolve as follows: II. TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FINDINGS A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66473.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, the City Council finds that the Tentative Subdivision Map, as conditioned herein, is in conformance with the elements of the City's General Plan, based on the following: 1. Land Use and Transportation The General Plan land use designation is Low Medium Density Residential (3-6 DU/AC). The implementing zone is RMl Residential. Lot size is governed through the Design Review process. The proposed subdivision will be developed with residential lots at a density of 10 DU/AC, with an average lot size of 3,081 square feet and a minimum of 2,705 square feet. The minimum and average lot sizes and density at 5.9 du/ac are within the allowable density and the permitted number of dwelling units. 14-149 City Council Resolution No. Page 3 All off-site public streets required to serve the subdivision already exist or will be constructed or paid for by the Applicant in accordance with the Conditions of Approval. The on-site public streets are designed in accordance with the City design standards and/or requirements and provides for vehicular and pedestrian connections. 2. Economic Development The Project, when considered in conjunction with CVT 11-02, 11-03, and 11-05, results in a net zero increase in units within Village 2, while providing a previously unavailable, single-family, small lot product in a more compact format, which will be locatedwithin walking distance of the village core. The four and six-unit compact products support economic policies regarding the pursuit and provision of diverse housing types and costs in order to provide balance for housing opportunities as well as jobs. These compact, clustered, single-family products provide a wider range of housing options and pricing for potential home-buyers in the current housing market. By reallocating 113 units and increasing densities close to the village core, it can be anticipated that there will be increased patronage to the nearby commercial and public/quasi-public uses, which will contribute to greater economic development within Village 2 and the City. The Project allows the development of detached small lot single-family homes on separate, fee-simple lots. This housing type is reflective of greater demand for these products in today's economic environment. The four- and six- unit cluster design around a central auto/activity court provides a housing type that is new to Village 2, and specifically designed to align with today's marketplace and economic conditions. The Project provides home-buyers the opportunity to purchase detached, single- family homes with greater affordability, reduced maintenance/utility costs, and less dependency on the automobile. As a new housing type within Otay Ranch, the proposed homes also provide further variation in housing opportunities available to Chula Vista residents, consistent with General Plan Objective ED 2. The proposed project also fosters economic development at the community level by providing for increased housing densities within the same footprint. These increased densities allow for infrastructure and municipal services to be provided at reduced cost per capita (more people served by the same municipal services). Additionally, with increased housing (and population) within the same footprint, increased densities improve the viability of community serving commercial and public/quasi public uses as well as alternative transportation modes. As a result, the proposed project may serve as a catalyst for small and mid-sized industries and businesses and community-serving and neighborhood uses, consistent with Objective ED 3 and ED 9. 3. Public Facilities and Services/Drainage and Water Quality The Project has been conditioned to ensure that all necessary public facilities and services will be available to serve the Project contemporaneous with the demand for those services. A Public Facilities Financing Plan has been prepared to supplement 14-150 City Council Resolution No. Page 4 that which is already in place to define public service, facility, and phasing needs created by the Project. Project-level water quality technical reports were completed for the proposed project. The water quality technical reports outline three options for achieving the water quality treatment and hydromodification requirements of the City of Chula Vista. One of the three options would be implemented and approved by the City Engineer. The proposed unit transfers would continue to comply with all applicable rules and regulations, including compliance with NPDES permit requirements for urban runoff and storm water discharge. Best Management Practices (BMPs) for design, treatment and monitoring for storm water quality would be implemented as delineated in the EIR with respect to municipal and construction permits. Compliance with all applicable rules and regulations governing water quality as well as implementation of all mitigation measures outlined in Section 5.9 of the EIR and the measures outlined in the water quality technical reports (Hunsaker and Associates 2011a,b) would ensure no additional impacts to water quality beyond those previously analyzed. Project-specific analyses have been conducted relative to the project's potential sewer and water impacts. The proposed project would reduce average projected water demands by 38,800 gallons per day (gpd). This reduction is due to an increase in density (greater than 8 units per acre), resulting in a reduced water demand per unit. As such, the water system recommendations from the May 2006 Subarea Master Plan for Village 2 remain unchanged as a result of this project. Additionally, while the total projected sewage flows will not change as a result of the proposed project, the project does involve shifting 83 units from the Wolf Canyon Basin to the Poggi Basin, which results in a shift of 21,995 gpd from the Wolf Canyon Basin to the Poggi Basin. The proposed project, however, would not require additional reaches of the Poggi Canyon Interceptor to be upgraded in the future. Upon approval of the proposed project, the Development Impact Fee for the Poggi Basin would be updated to reflect the additional units. 4. Environmental Element The Project has been reviewed in accordance with the requirements of CEQA. An Addendum has been prepared for the project in order to address the proposed modifications to the lot configurations within Village Two from the adopted Final Second Tier Environmental Impact Report, Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, FEIR 02-02. The proposed modifications would not result in an increase in overall unit count, and would not substantially change traffic generation or distribution patterns. No additional significant impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the EIR, or substantial increases in any identified significant impacts are anticipated; however, the proposed modification represents new information that was not available at the time that the EIR was certified. Therefore, the Addendum and the Mitigation 14-151 City Council Resolution No. Page 5 Monitoring Program ensures that all environmental impacts will be mitigated to a level less than significant. 5. Growth Management Due to the Project's `no net change to number of dwelling units', the surrounding street segments and intersections as planned or built, including Olympic Parkway and Santa Victoria Road, will continue to operate/serve at the same Level of Service in compliance with the City's traffic threshold standard with the proposed project traffic. No adverse impact to the City's traffic threshold standards would occur as a result of the proposed project. The Project site is located in the attendance area of Hedenkamp Elementary School, within the boundaries of the Chula Vista Elementary School District. The Project is also within the attendance area of Otay Ranch High School and Olympian High School, within the Sweetwater Union High School District. The Applicant will be required to pay applicable developer fees based upon assessable area. 6. Open Space and Conservation The project proposes single-family homes that meet the minimum open space requirement per the Otay Ranch Village 2 SPA. The project would also be required to provide parkland or pay park fees towards the acquisition and development of future parks. The proposed landfonn grading conforms to the City's grading Ordinance and retains regional and natural open space features. The development of the site is consistent with the goals and policies of the Conservation Element. B. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66473.1 of the Subdivision Map Act, the configuration, orientation, and topography of the site allow for the optimum siting of lots for natural and passive heating and cooling opportunities. The development of the site will be subject to site plan and architectural review to ensure the maximum utilization of natural and passive heating and cooling opportunities. C. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66412.3 of the Subdivision Map Act, the Council certifies that it has considered the effect of this approval on the housing needs of the region and has balanced those needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City and the available fiscal and environmental resources. D. The site is physically suited for residential development, because it is generally level and is located adjacent to existing residential developments. The Project conforms to all standards established by the City for a residential development. E. The conditions herein imposed on the grant of permit or other entitlement herein contained is approximately proportional both. in nature and extent to the impact created by the proposed development. 14-152 City Council Resolution No. Page 6 III. GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66020 NOTICE Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d)(1), NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 90 day period to protest the imposition of any impact fee, dedication, reservation, or other exaction described in this resolution begins on the effective date of this resolution and any such protest must be in a manner that complies with Section 66020(a) and failure to follow timely this procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, set aside, void or annual imposition. The right to protest the fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions does not apply to planning, zoning, grading, or other similar application processing fees or service fees in connection with the project; and it does not apply to any fees, dedication, reservations, or other exactions which have been given notice similar to this, nor does it revive challenges to any fees for which the Statute of Limitations has previously expired. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby approve the Project subject to the general and special conditions set forth below. IV. TENTATIVE MAP GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL A. Project Site is improved with Project The Applicant, or his/her successors in interest and assigns, shall improve the Project Site with the Project as described in the Tentative Subdivision Map, known Chula Vista Tract 11-04. V. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL A. The conditions herein imposed on the tentative map approval herein contained are approximately proportional both to nature and extent of impact created by the proposed development. Unless otherwise specified, all conditions and code requirements listed below shall be fully completed by the Applicant or successor-in-interest to the City's satisfaction prior to approval of the Final Map, unless otherwise specified: Planning Division: 1. Applicant shall develop and maintain the Project Site in accordance with the approved plans, which include site plans, floor plan, and elevation plan on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and Title 19. 2. Prior to, or in conjunction with the issuance of the first building permit, pay all applicable fees, including any unpaid balances of permit processing fees for the Project under deposit account DQ-1652. 14-153 City Council Resolution No. Page 7 Land Development Division: 3. All of the terms, covenants and conditions contained herein shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of the Developer as to any or all of the Property. For purposes of this document the term "Developer" shall also mean "Applicant". 4. All of the terms, covenants and conditions contained within the Tentative Map for Tract No. 06-OS shall continue to be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of the Developer as to any or all of the Property. 5. All of the terms, covenants and conditions contained within the Amendment to the City of Chula Vista Subdivision Manual Section 5-000 for the inclusion of the Standard Conditions of Approval for Tentative Maps shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of the Developer as to any or all of the Property. 6. Developer shall provide one sewer lateral for each unit and all shall be shown on the improvement plans as directed by the City Engineer. 7. Prior to approval of any final map for the Project, Developer shall secure and construct all offsite facilities as identified in the Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP). Developer shall submit security in a form approved by the City Attorney, for any required offsite improvements as shown on the approved Tentative Map or as required by the PFFP. Any offsite permission or right of way that will be required to install such improvements shall be obtained prior to the approval of any final map, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 8. Prior to the approval of any final map within the Project, Developer shall obtain approval of a Joint Use Agreement and Right of Way crossings for Santa Victoria and Santa Diana over the City of San Diego waterline to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 9. Developer shall ensure that the Homeowners Association (HOA) maintains all Water Quality Facilities for the Project. Prior to final map approval, the Developer shall obtain the approval from the City Engineer, of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's). Developer shall also demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director that such maintenance is accounted for in the HOA annual budget. 10. Prior to approval of any building permit for the Project, Developer shall obtain approval, by the City of Chula Vista, of the `landscape documentation package' that demonstrates that the landscape associated with this Project complies with the City of Chula Vista Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance, Chapter 20.12 of the Municipal Code. The title sheet of the drawings shall contain a signed statement from the landscape architect as follows: "I am familiar with and agree to comply with the requirements for landscape improvement plans as described in Chapter 20.12 of the Municipal Code. I have 14-154 City Council Resolution No. Page 8 prepared this plan in compliance with those regulations. 1 certify that the plan implements the regulations to provide efficient landscape water use." 11. Sidewalks immediately adjacent to any low walls shall have a band of scoring to alert pedestrians to the proximity to the wall. The scoring shall be located along the base of the wall and may contain vine-planting pockets. The scoring pattern, the size of the band, and any of its features thereof, including vine-planting pockets, shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 12. All existing and proposed perimeter theme walls and fences shall be part of the landscape and irrigation plans for the Project. The landscape and irrigation plans shall show design, height and materials for the walls/fences. 13. Ensure that prospective purchasers receive a copy of the City of Chula Vista Landscape Water Conservation Checklist. 14. Prior to the issuance of the first occupancy permit for a unit within a neighborhood included in the Final Map and abutting open space, the Developer shall install slope Landscape and Irrigation in accordance with the approved L&I plans in all open space areas immediately adjacent to that neighborhood. The installation shall be coordinated with owners of adjacent neighborhoods when necessary. Fire Department: 15. The Building Permit plans shall demonstrate a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute (gpm) fora 2-hour duration (at 20psi). The 1,500 gpm is for homes that are less than 3,600 square feet. For larger homes (3,601 +), they shall meet the fire flow requirements, based upon size and construction type, as stated within the adopted fire code. 16. The Applicant shall provide a water flow letter from the applicable water agency having jurisdiction, to the Chula Vista Fire Department, indicating that the fire flow is available to serve this project. 17. The Applicant shall install Fire Hydrants located not greater than 500 feet apart for single-family and 300 feet apart for multi-family properties. The minimum fire hydrant size shall be: 6" x 4" x 2" '/z x 2 Yz" prior to occupancy. 18. Prior to occupancy, the structure shall be addressed in accordance with the currently adopted code. 19. The Applicant shall comply with the adopted State of California Building Code changes that require all new one and two-family homes and townhouses built in the state starting January 1, 2011, to be equipped with life-saving fire sprinkler systems. B. The following on-going conditions shall apply to the Project Site as long as it relies on this approval: 14-155 City Council Resolution No. Page 9 20. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the CVMC, and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 21. The Property Owner and Applicant shall and do agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City, its City Council members, officers, employees and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees (collectively, liabilities) incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectly, from (a) City's approval of this tentative map and (b) City's approval or issuance of any other permit or action, whether discretionary or non- discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated on the Project Site. The Property Owner and Applicant shall acknowledge their agreement to this provision by executing a copy of this Tentative Subdivision Map where indicated below. The Property Owner's and Applicant's compliance with this provision shall be binding on any and all of the Property Owner's and Applicant's successors and assigns. 22. All of the terms, covenants and conditions contained herein shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of the Developer as to any or all of the Property. For purposes of this document the term "Developer" shall also mean "Applicant". 23. The Applicant shall comply with all requirements and guidelines of the City of Chula Vista General Plan; the City's Growth Management Ordinance; Chula Vista Landscape Manual, Chula Design Plan; Otay Ranch General Development Plan, Otay Ranch Resource Management Plan, Phase 1 and Phase 2; Ranch Wide Affordable Housing Plan; Otay Ranch Overall Design Plan; Otay Ranch Village Two Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and supporting documents including: Village Two Public Facilities Finance Plan; Village Two Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Trails Plan; Village Two SPA Affordable Housing Plan and the Non-Renewable Energy Conservation Plan as amended from time to time, unless specifically modified by the appropriate department head, with the approval of the City Manager. These plans may be subject to minor modifications by the appropriate department head, with the approval of the City Manager, however, any material modifications shall be subject to approval by the City Council. 24. If any of the terms, covenants or conditions contained herein shall fail to occur or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted including issuance of building permits, deny, or further condition the subsequent approvals that are derived from the approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions; and/or seek damages for their violation. The applicant shall be notified 10 days in advance prior to any of the above actions being taken by the City and shall be given the opportunity to remedy any deficiencies identified by the City. 25. Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City harmless from and against any and all claims, liabilities and costs, including attorney's fees, arising from challenges to the Environmental Impact Report and subsequent environmental review for the Project 14-156 City Council Resolution No. Page 10 and any or all entitlements and approvals issued by the City in connection with the Project. 26. The applicant shall comply with all applicable Village Two SPA conditions of approval, (PCM 11-06) as may be amended from time to time. VL EXECUTION AND RECORDATION OF RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL The Property Owner and Applicant shall execute this document signing on the lines provided below, indicating that the Property Owner and Applicant have each read, understood and agreed to the conditions contained herein, and will implement same. Upon execution, this document shall be recorded with the County Recorder of the County of San Diego, at the sole expense of the Property Owner and/or Applicant, and a signed, stamped copy returned to the City's Development Services Department Failure to return the signed and stamped copy of this recorded document within 10 days of recordation shall indicate the Property Owner/Applicant's desire that the project, and the corresponding application for building permits and/or a business license, be held in abeyance without approval. Signature of Property Owner Date Signature of Applicant Date VII. CONFORMANCE WITH CITY SUBDIVISION MANUAL The City Council does hereby find that the Project is in conformance with the City of Chula Vista Subdivision Manual, Section 18.12 and the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. VIII. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon the enforceability of each and every term, provision, and condition herein stated; and that in the event that any one or more terms, provisions, or conditions are determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, this resolution, the map approved hereunder, and any permits issued in reliance hereon shall be deemed to be automatically revoked and of no further force and effect ab initio. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chula Vista City Council does hereby approve Tentative Subdivision Map (PCS-11-04) subject to conditions listed above to subdivide 25.5 acres in order to increase the single family lots from sixty-three (63) to one hundred twenty six (126) and provide for one (1) open space lot and one (1) neighborhood open space lot within Otay Ranch Village 2 Neighborhood R-6. 14-157 City Council Resolution No. Page 11 Presented by: Gary Halbert, P.E., AICP . Assistant City Manager/ Development Services Director 14-158 CtlOH 3`Jtl114l3H FRANCESCHI DRIVE BATH AVENUE V PAINTED CAVE AVE DONZEAVENUE n n 9 2 O z v 3Atl tlNIlSIHHD tl1NVS 9 s D O O D D YANONALI AVENUE n ~i S m O x O 0 O n a n m x -~ _ ~ D RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP WITHIN OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 2 -CHULA VISTA TRACT 11-OS RECITALS 1. Project Site WHEREAS, the parcel, that is the subject matter of this resolution, is represented in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and for the purpose of general description is located in the northern portion of Otay Ranch Village 2 Neighborhood R-8 & R-9b, Chula Vista ("Property"); and Project; Applications for Discretionary Approval WHEREAS, on April 5, 2011, a duly verified application for a Tentative Subdivision Map (Chula Vista Tract (CVT) 11-OS) was filed with the City of Chula Vista Development Services Department by Baldwin & Sons ("Applicant") to subdivide 44.2 acres to approve 180 single- family residential lots (an increase of 50 single-family units (27 in R-8 and 23 in R-9b)), 4 multi- family residential lots, and 15 neighborhood open space lots in the north central portion of Otay Ranch Village 2 ("Project"); and Environmental Determination WHEREAS, The Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project was covered in previously adopted Final Second Tier Environmental Impact Report for the Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, (FEIR 02-02). The Development Services Director has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the Development Service Director has prepared an addendum to this document, FEIR 02-02. No further environmental review is necessary; and 4. Planning Commission Record on Application WHEREAS, on Januazy 11, 2012, the Director of Development Services set a hearing before the Planning Commission for the consideration of and recommendation on Tentative Subdivision Map. Notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by both publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City and mailing to property owners and residents within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the Property at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and 14-160 City Council Resolution No. Page 2 WHEREAS, a hearing at the time and place as advertised, namely January 11, 2012, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, was held before the Planning Commission: said hearing was thereafter closed; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the Tentative Subdivision Map CVT 11-05; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission after considering all evidence and testimony presented recommended by a vote of 6-0-1 that the City of Chula Vista City Council approve the Tentative Subdivision Map CVT 11-OS within Otay Ranch Village 2 neighborhoods R-8 and R- 9b; and 5. City Council Record on Application WHEREAS, a hearing time and place was set by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista for consideration of the Project and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by both publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City and mailing to property owners and residents within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, on January 24, 2012, at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista held the duly noticed public hearing to consider said Project: said hearing was thereafter closed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows: II. TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FINDINGS A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66473.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, the City Council finds that the Tentative Subdivision Map, as conditioned herein, is in conformance with the elements of the City's General Plan, based on the following: Land Use and Transportation The General Plan Designation for R-8a, R-8b, R-9b is Low Medium Density (3-6 DU/AC). The implementing zone is RM1. Lot size for these neighborhoods is governed through the Design Review Process. The implementing zone for R8a is SF3, which allows minimum lot area of 4,000 square feet and average lot area of 5,000 square feet. The proposed R-8a, R-8b, and R-9b, will be developed in combination with other surrounding developments in the LM land use area and are, in combination, within the allowable density and permitted number of dwelling units. 14-161 City Council Resolution No. Page 3 All off-site public streets required to serve the subdivision already exist or will be constructed or paid for by the Applicant in accordance with the Conditions of Approval. The on-site public streets are designed in accordance with the City design standards and/or requirements and provides for vehicular and pedestrian connections. 2. Economic Development The Project, when considered in conjunction with CVT I1-02, I1-03, and 11-04, results in a net zero increase in units within Village 2, while providing a previously unavailable, single-family, small lot product in a more compact format, which will be located within walking distance of the village core. The four and six-unit compact products support economic policies regarding the pursuit and provision of diverse housing types and costs in order to provide balance for housing opportunities as well as jobs. These compact clustered single-family products provide a wider range of housing options and pricing for potential home buyers in the current housing market. By reallocating 113 units and increasing densities close to the village core, it can be anticipated that there will be increased patronage to the nearby commercial and public/quasi-public uses, which will contribute to greater economic development within Village 2 and the City. The Project allows the development of detached small lot single-family homes on separate, fee-simple lots. This housing type is reflective of greater demand for these products in today's economic environment. The four- and six- unit cluster design around a central auto/activity court provides a housing type that is new to Village 2, and specifically designed to align with today's marketplace and economic conditions. The Project provides home-buyers the opportunity to purchase detached, single- family homes with greater affordability, reduced maintenance/utility costs, and less dependency on the automobile. As a new housing type within Otay Ranch, the proposed homes also provide further variation in housing opportunities available to Chula Vista residents, consistent with General Plan Objective ED 2. The proposed project also fosters economic development at the community level by providing for increased housing densities within the same footprint. These increased densities allow for infrastructure and municipal services to be provided at reduced cost per capita (more people served by the same municipal services). Additionally, with increased housing (and population) within the same footprint, increased densities improve the viability of community serving commercial and public/quasi public uses as well as alternative transportation modes. As a result, the proposed project may serve as a catalyst for small and mid-sized industries and businesses and community-serving and neighborhood uses, consistent with Objective ED 3 and ED 9. 3. Public Facilities and Services/Drainage and Water Quality The Project has been conditioned to ensure that all necessary public facilities and services will be available to serve the Project contemporaneous with the demand for those services. A Public Facilities Financing Plan has been prepared to supplement 14-162 City Council Resolution No. Page 4 that which is already in place to define public service, facility, and phasing needs created by the Project. Project-level water quality technical reports were completed for the proposed project and are included as Appendix A of the Initial Study (Hunsaker and Associates 2011a,b). The water quality technical reports outline three options for achieving the water quality treatment and hydromodification requirements of the City of Chula Vista. One of the three options would be implemented and approved by the City Engineer. The proposed unit transfers would continue to comply with all applicable rules and regulations, including compliance with NPDES permit requirements for urban runoff and storm water discharge. Best Management Practices (BMPs) for design, treatment and monitoring for storm water quality would be implemented as delineated in the EIR with respect to municipal and construction permits. Compliance with all applicable rules and regulations governing water quality as well as implementation of all mitigation measures outlined in Section 5.9 of the EIR and the measures outlined in the water qua]ity technical reports (Hunsaker and Associates 2011a,b) would ensure no additional impacts to water quality beyond those previously analyzed. Project-specific analyses have been conducted relative to the project's potential sewer and water impacts. The proposed project would reduce average projected water demands by 38,800 gallons per day (gpd). This reduction is due to an increase in density (greater than 8 units per acre), resulting in a reduced water demand per unit. As such, the water system recommendations from the May 2006 Subarea Master Plan for Village 2 remain unchanged as a result of this project. Additionally, while the total projected sewage flows will not change as a result of the proposed project, the project does involve shifting 83 units from the Wolf Canyon Basin to the Poggi Basin, which results in a shift of 21,995 gpd from the Wolf Canyon Basin to the Poggi Basin. The proposed project, however, would not require additional reaches of the Poggi Canyon Interceptor to be upgraded in the future. Upon approval of the proposed project, the Development Impact Fee for the Poggi Basin would be updated to reflect the additional units. 4. Environmental Element The Project has been reviewed in accordance with the requirements of CEQA. An Addendum has been prepared for the project in order to address the proposed modifications to the lot configurations within Village Two from the adopted Final Second Tier Environmental Impact Report, Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three, and a Portion of Village Four Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, FEIR 02-02. The proposed modifications would not result in an increase in overall unit count, and would not substantially change traffic generation or distribution patterns. No additional significant impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the EIR, or substantial increases in any identified significant impacts are anticipated; however, the proposed modification represents new information that was not available at the 14-163 City Council Resolution No. Page 5 time that the EIR was certified. Therefore, the Addendum and the Mitigation Monitoring Program ensures that all environmental impacts will be mitigated to a level less than significant. 5. Growth Management Due to the Project's `no net change to number of dwelling units', the surrounding street segments and intersections as planned or built, including Olympic Parkway and Santa Victoria Road, will continue to operate/serve at the same Level of Service in compliance with the City's traffic threshold standard with the proposed project traffic. No adverse impact to the City's traffic threshold standards would occur as a result of the proposed project. The Project site is located in the attendance area of Hedenkamp Elementary School, within the boundaries of the Chula Vista Elementary School District. The Project is also within the attendance area of Otay Ranch High School and Olympian High School, within the Sweetwater Union High School District. The Applicant will be required to pay applicable developer fees based upon assessable area. 6. Open Space and Conservation The Project proposes single-family homes that meet the minimum open space requirement per the Otay Ranch Village 2 SPA. The project would also be required to provide parkland or pay park fees towards the acquisition and development of future parks. The proposed landform grading conforms to the City's grading Ordinance and retains regional and natural open space features. The development of the site is consistent with the goals and policies of the Conservation Element. B. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66473.1 of the Subdivision Map Act, the configuration, orientation, and topography of the site allow for the optimum siting of lots for natural and passive heating and cooling opportunities. The development of the site will be subject to site plan and architectural review to insure the maximum utilization of natural and passive heating and cooling opportunities. C. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66412.3 of the Subdivision Map Act, the Council certifies that it has considered the effect of this approval on the housing needs of the region and has balanced those needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City and the available fiscal and environmental resources. D. The site is physically suited for residential development because it is generally level and is located adjacent to existing residential developments. The Project conforms to all standazds established by the City for a residential development. E. The conditions herein imposed on the grant of permit or other entitlement herein contained is approximately proportional both in nature and extent to the impact created by the proposed development. 14-164 City Council Resolution No. Page 6 III. GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66020 NOTICE Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d)(1), NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 90 day period to protest the imposition of any impact fee, dedication, reservation, or other exaction described in this resolution begins on the effective date of this resolution and any such protest must be in a manner that complies with Section 66020(a) and failure to follow timely this procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, set aside, void or annual imposition. The right to protest the fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions does not apply to planning, zoning, grading, or other similar application processing fees or service fees in connection with the project; and it does not apply to any fees, dedication, reservations, or other exactions which have been given notice similar to this, nor does it revive challenges to any fees for which the Statute of Limitations has previously expired. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby approve the Project subject to the general and special conditions set forth below. IV. TENTATIVE MAP GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL A. Project Site is improved with Project The Applicant, or his/her successors in interest and assigns, shall improve the Project Site with the Project as described in the Tentative Subdivision Map, known Chula Vista Tract 11-05. V. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL A. The conditions herein imposed on the tentative map approval herein contained are approximately proportional both to nature and extent of impact created by the proposed development. Unless otherwise specified, all conditions and code requirements listed below shall be fully completed by the Applicant or successor-in-interest to the City's satisfaction prior to approval of the Final Map, unless otherwise specified: Planning Division: 1. Applicant shall develop and maintain the Project Site in accordance with the approved plans, which include site plans, floor plan, and elevation plan on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and Title 19. 2. Prior to, or in conjunction with the issuance of the first building permit, pay all applicable fees, including any unpaid balances of permit processing fees for the Project under deposit account DQ-1652. 14-165 City Council Resolution No. Page 7 Land Development Division: 3. All of the terms, covenants and conditions contained herein shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of the Developer as to any or all of the Property. For purposes of this document the term "Developer" shall also mean "Applicant". 4. All of the terms, covenants and conditions contained within the Tentative Map for Tract No. 06-OS shall continue to be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of the Developer as to any or all of the Property. 5. All of the terms, covenants and conditions contained within the Amendment to the City of Chula Vista Subdivision Manual Section 5-000 for the inclusion of the Standard Conditions of Approval for Tentative Maps shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of the Developer as to any or all of the Property. 6. Developer shall provide one sewer lateral for each unit and all shall be shown on the improvement plans as directed by the City Engineer. 7. Prior to approval of any final map for the Project, Developer shall secure and construct all offsite facilities as identified in the Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP). Developer shall submit security in a form approved by the City Attorney, for any required offsite improvements as shown on the approved Tentative Map or as required by the PFFP. Any offsite permission or right of way that will be required to install such improvements shall be obtained prior to the approval of any final map, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 8. Prior to the approval of any final map within the Project, Developer shall obtain approval of a Joint Use Agreement and Right of Way crossings for Santa Victoria and Santa Diana over the City of San Diego waterline to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 9. Developer shall insure that the Homeowners Association (HOA) maintains all Water Quality Facilities for the Project. Prior to final map approval, the Developer shall obtain the approval from the City Engineer, of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's). Developer shall also demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director that such maintenance is accounted for in the HOA annual budget. 10. Prior to approval of any buildirig permit for the Project, Developer shall obtain approval, by the City of Chula Vista, of the `landscape documentation package' that demonstrates that the landscape associated with this Project complies with the City of Chula Vista Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance, Chapter 20.12 of the Municipal Code. The title sheet of the drawings shall contain a signed statement from the landscape architect as follows: "I am familiar with and agree to comply with the requirements for landscape improvement plans as described in Chapter 20.12 of the Municipal Code. I have 14-166 City Cowrcil Resolution No. Page 8 prepared this plan in compliance with those regulations. I certify that the plan implements the regulations to provide efficient landscape water use." 11. Sidewalks immediately adjacent to any low walls shall have a band of scoring to alert pedestrians to the proximity to the wall. The scoring shall be located along the base of the wall and may contain vine-planting pockets. The scoring pattern, the size of the band, and any of its features thereof, including vine-planting pockets, shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 12. All existing and proposed perimeter theme walls and fences shall be part of the landscape and irrigation plans for the Project. The landscape and irrigation plans shall show design, height and materials for the walls/fences. 13. Ensure that prospective purchasers receive a copy of the City of Chula Vista Landscape Water Conservation Checklist. 14. Prior to the issuance of the first occupancy permit for a unit within a neighborhood included in the Final Map and abutting open space, the Developer shall install slope Landscape and Irrigation in accordance with the approved L&I plans in all open space areas immediately adjacent to that neighborhood. The installation shall be coordinated with owners of adjacent neighborhoods when necessary. Fire Department: 15. The Building Permit plans shall demonstrate a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute (gpm) fora 2-hour duration (at 20psi). The 1,500 gpm is for homes that are less than 3,600 square feet. For larger homes (3,601 +), they shall meet the fire flow requirements, based upon size and construction type, as stated within the adopted fire code. 16. The Applicant shall provide a water flow letter from the applicable water agency having jurisdiction, to the Chula Vista Fire Department, indicating that the fire flow is available to serve this project. 17. The Applicant shall install Fire Hydrants located not greater than 500 feet apart for single-family and 300 feet apart for multi-family properties. The minimum fire hydrant size shall be: 6' x 4" x 2" '/z x 2 %2" prior to occupancy. 18. Prior to occupancy, the structure shall be addressed in accordance with the currently adopted code. 19. The Applicant shall comply with the adopted State of California Building Code changes that require all new one and two-family homes and townhouses built in the state starting January 1, 2011, to be equipped with life-saving fire sprinkler systems. B. The following on-going conditions shall apply to the Project Site as ]ong as it relies on this approval: 14-167 City Council Resolution No. Page 9 20. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the CVMC, and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 21. The Property Owner and Applicant shall and do agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City, its City Council members, officers, employees and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees (collectively, liabilities) incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectly, from (a) City's approval this tentative map and (b) City's approval or issuance of any other permit or action, whether discretionary or non- discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated on the Project Site. The Property Owner and Applicant shall acknowledge their agreement to this provision by executing a copy of this Tentative Subdivision Map where indicated below. The Property Owner's and Applicant's compliance with this provision shall be binding on any and all of the Property Owner's and Applicant's successors and assigns. 22. All of the terms, covenants and conditions contained herein shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of the Developer as to any or all of the Property. For purposes of this document the term "Developer" shall also mean "Applicant". 23. The Applicant shall comply with all requirements and guidelines of the City of Chula Vista General Plan; the City's Growth Management Ordinance; Chula Vista Landscape Manual, Chula Design Plan; Otay Ranch General Development Plan, Otay Ranch Resource Management Plan, Phase 1 and Phase 2; Ranch Wide Affordable Housing Plan; Otay Ranch Overall Design Plan; Otay Ranch Village Two Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and supporting documents including: Village Two Public Facilities Finance Plan; Village Two Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Trails Plan; Village Two SPA Affordable Housing Plan and the Non-Renewable Energy Conservation Plan as amended from time to time, unless specifically modified by the appropriate department head, with the approval of the City Manager. These plans may be subject to minor modifications by the appropriate department head, with the approval of the City Manager, however, any material modifications shall be subject to approval by the City Council. 24. If any of the terms, covenants or conditions contained herein shall fail to occur or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, including issuance of building permits; deny, or further condition the subsequent approvals that are derived from the approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions, and/or seek damages for their violation. The applicant shall be notified 10 days in advance prior to any of the above actions being taken by the City and shall be given the opportunity to remedy any deficiencies identified by the City. 25. Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City harmless from and against any and all claims, liabilities and costs, including attorney's fees, arising from challenges to the Environmental Impact Report and subsequent environmental review for the Project 14-168 City Council Resolution No. Page 10 and any or all entitlements and approvals issued by the City in connection with the Proj ect_ 26. The applicant shall comply with all applicable Village Two SPA conditions of approval, (PCM 11-06) as may be amended from time to time. VI. EXECUTION AND RECORDATION OF RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL The Property Owner and Applicant shall execute this document signing on the lines provided below, indicating that the Property Owner and Applicant have each read, understood and agreed to the conditions contained herein, and will implement same. Upon execution, this document shall be recorded with the County Recorder of the County of San Diego, at the sole expense of the Property Owner and/or Applicant, and a signed, stamped copy returned to the City's Development Services Department. Failure to return the signed and stamped copy of this recorded document within ] 0 days of recordation shall indicate the Property Owner/Applicant's desire that the project, and the corresponding application for building permits and/or a business license, be held in abeyance without approval. Signature of Property Owner Date Signature of Applicant Date Vll. CONFORMANCE WITH CITY SUBDIVISION MANUAL The City Council does hereby find that the Project is in conformance with the City of Chula Vista Subdivision Manual, Section 18.12 and the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. VIII. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION It is the nitention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon the enforceability of each and every term, provision, and condition herein stated; and that in the event that any one or more terms, provisions, or conditions are determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, this resolution, the map approved hereunder, and any permit issued in reliance hereon shall be deemed to be automatically revoked and of no further force and effect ab initio. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chula Vista City Council does hereby approve Tentative Subdivision Map (PCS-II-OS) subject to conditions listed above to subdivide 44.2 acres to approve 180 single-family residential lots, 4multi-family residential lots, and 15 neighborhood open space lots in the north central portion of Otay Ranch Village 2, Neighborhoods R-8 and R-9b. 14-169 City Council Resolution No. Page 11 Presented by: Gary Halbert, P.E., A1CP Assistant City Manager/ Development Services Director 14-170 EXHIBIT "A" CVT 11-05 OI~MPIG PAR I / ~ KWAY ~ \ ~- . ~- J PQiOIW ST. Z ~ C a F M 14-171