HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1973-6863RESOLUTION NO. 6863
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA ACCEPTING THE EPdVIRONP2E~TTAL Ir~!IP11CT REPORT FOR
SWEETWATER REGIONAL PARK
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the Administrator of the Public Works Agency of
San Diego County, D. K. Speer, has forwarded a copy of the Environ-
mental Impact Statement for the Sweetwater Regional Park, prepared
by the Public Works Agency, Park Development Division, Edwin J. Moses,
Director, to the City of Chula Vista because of the City's interest
and concern in the development of said project, and
WHEP,EAS, the report has been reviewed by the Environmental
Review Coordinator and the Environmental Review Committee and it
has been determined that said report does meet with the approval of
the City of Chula Vista.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Chula Vista that based upon the recommendation of the Environ-
mental Review Coordinator and the Environmental Review Committee, the
City Council does hereby approve the Environmental Impact Statement
for Sweetwater Regional Park.
Presented by
.~ . _.
E. Emerson Hall, Director of
Parks and P.ecreation
Approved as to form by
' ~
. --
George Lind erg, City Atto
ADOPTED AidD APPROVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CHULA
VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 22nd day of May , 19 73, by
the following vote, to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Hyde, E
IQAYES: Councilmen None
ahl, Scott, Hobel, Hamilton
ABSENT; Councilmen None
/~ ~
;',,.= , s
,; ; ,~
'~ ~- ~1
ATTEST `%" r'
L~_'.~ . Ci -y erk
f,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
x ~ ~ ,~ ~~'
,fin , ~p ~q~ ~ ~, ,:
~, 1~y'~^ti:r'.o'np"C.c+~"'r"A+'°~wr~e r~'~ ~~ r E-'Z y'ti.
a
Mayor of the City of Chula Vista
I, , City Cler}c of the City of
Chula Vista, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above is a full,
true and correct copy of Resolution No. , and that the same has not
been amended or repealed. DATED
City Clerk
Environmental Impact Statement
Sweetwater Regional Park
Prepared by
Public Works Agency
• Park•Development Division
Edwi n J . h1oses , Director
/! ;:~~~i
Project Description
Pro~act Location:
The proposed project is located in the Stiv2etwater River Basin and is
generally hounded by tl~e South Bay Free~~ray and .the proposed Helix Freetivay on
the north and east and by San Miguel F,oad and Interstate tliohti~ray 5 on the south
and west.
The proposed prajact area is shoti~n on the attached 7 l/2 minute U.S.G.S.
topograpi~ic map, idational City and Jamul btountain Quadrangles.
Project Objectives:
The objectives of tite proposed project are to provide recreational facilities
for the residents of Sari Diego County. The recreation facilities to be offered
are to be regional in scope and will accent the natural environment of the park
setting.
Cf~aracteristics of t'ze Project:
Tlie proposed project is planned as a phased program for acquisition and
developr;~ nt of a San Giego County Regional Park. This regional park will be
located in the Sweetwater River Basin and will encompass tf~e Sweetwater Reservoir.
Tl~e proposed park will. grow to maximum size of 5015 acres by 1990 and will offer
recreational facilities that are regional in scope to include picnicking,
games areas, bicycling, swimming, boating, fishing, hiking, family and group
camping, equestrian facilities, cultural facilities, a museum and an amphitheatre.
This project is included in the Regional Paris Implementation Study as
approved in concept by San Diego County Board of Supervisors action on items
4/19/72 (1) through 4/19/72 (6~.
The proposed project, i]lustrated on the attached master plan sketch, is
designed to accent the natural environment of~the park site. All modifications
to the existing topography including roads, building sites for structures and
~r
~ ;~ ,.~i" i..~
-2-
cultural facilities trill be located to mininize any impact on existing plant
or animal life.
The entire concept of this park project is to preserve open space for
posterity in a manner that allotivs non destructive use of facilities by boot
present and future generations.
Description of Environ~rQntal Setting:
The, proposed park site is an irregular shaped parcel of land t~~hich is
expected to reacf~ a maximum sizs of 5015 acres by 1990. This property is
located in the Svreetvrater P,iver Basin and is in a generally natural state.
Immediately to the north and vest of the proposed park: site are the
densely urbanized communities of San Diego, National City and Chula Vista,
California. These areas are zoned for residential, commercial and industrial
usage in normal urban patterns. South and east of the proposed site are
o .,rln~~n ~~~ , ~.,; , , ~~,~'~~-~'' residential davclop-
vast reach_s of u1...,r...l,,,~..d .and «~tn onl,~ a fo,r ~~,u1.1.L~%~.
ments. This entire area is zoned LC for limited control of development. The
undeveloped land consists of acid coastal desert and hasonly sparse vegetative
cover, primarily chaparral and low grasses. t~io rare or endangered species
are kno~~m to utilize the area and no geologic hazards exist in the vicinity.
The proposed park ~ si to surround the existing SweetY~ater Reservoir and
extends into the flood plain south and west of the reservoir dam.
Aside from the chaparral covered canyon area just belotir the dam, the park
Contains little significant native vegetation, being primarily limited to grasses,
herbaceous perennials and scatternd groups willo~~r, cottonwood,•sycamore and
pepper trees. l~(ildlife is mainly limited to rabbits, ground squirrels, skunks
and related small animals. None are known to be rare or endangered species.
No paleontological, archeological or historical significance is knotirn to be
associated with this area.
;.. ,
_,
-3-
• '~
Tie geologic significance of the proposed park site is limited to its
relationship to flood plain aspects of the area. Tfie proposed park. is generally
deficiad by the 100 year flood line of the Sweetl~~ater Riverbed and acts as a
drainage facility for a surrounding area of approximately 220 acres. Since the
majority of all water in the reservoir is artificially introduced this natu~•al
supply from ground ti~~ater sources is of little consequence.
`Enyi ron^,entai Ir~pacts
' The direct impacts on the environrn~ent which ti~rill result from the construction
of th~ proposed par:c cri 11 be 1 imi ted to:
1. Minor noise and air pollution during construction of facilities at the
site (sf~ort-tenm)
' 2. Possible slight to moderate traffic congestion of local roads during
hig;i use periods at the park, i.e., Holidays and weekends.
3. Favorable ir~pacts related to preserving extensive areas of open space
in its natural state.
ft. Visual relief of preserving a "green-belt" area adjacent to areas of
extensive urbanization.
Adverse Effects 4:hich Cannot Be Avoided if the Proposal is Im?lemented:
t*iinor noise and dust pollution during construction of tine park facilities
and slight to moderate traffic congestion in the area during period of peak
attendance at the park are unavoidable, ho~~~ever, none of t!~ese effects appear
to be significant.
iii ti 4 a ti n cLh"~ as u res
Restricting construction activities at the park to normal day-time working
hours and long-term plans ti•rhich will improve roads and frze-,rays to handle peak
traffic at tl~e park will suitably mollify anyadverse effects which might be
derived from the proposed project.
~ i - ~
k' "~~
_, ` ~
4
Alternatives to the Proposed Project:
The only viable alternative to the proposed project is to leave the proposed
site in its present state. This alternative v~rould result in dense residential
and commercial development of the area through private sources - with it's
associated increased severity of environmental impact.
Lon :Term Productivity versus Short-Term Ilse:
The long-term productivity of the area remains unchanged when incorporated
in a park or open space plan since construction of facilities is accomplished
at such a low density. Lack of change in the natural environment maintains
the land in its present state and thereby permits land use by both present and
future generations while minimizing any impact~on the land. Should a more
effective land use pattern become apparent in the future - its productivity
can be realized to its full potential.
Irreversible Environmental Chances:
Since the proposed park program will maintain the project area in its
present natural state - there will be no irreversible committment of resources.
Growth-Inducing Impact of the Proposed Project:
The net environmental effect of the proposed-park construction project
relative to growth inducing factors is positive. Inasmuch as the Sweetwater
Regional Park Development Plan Study was approved by the San Diego County Board
of Supervisors prior to approval of a Sweetwater Community Plan, the recommend-
ations for land use and peripheral traffic circulation adjacent to the park
which are included in the study can be considered during the preparation of the
Community Plan.
Not only will the park include in excess of 5,000 acres of public land
dedicated as open space which otherwise would be devoted to private development,
but low density housing along the perimeter of the park can be enforced through
i' ;'~ ~~
5.
design of the Sweetwater Community Plan. Long term design of circulation routes
adjacent to the proposed park can be directed to~~rard accomodating peak traffic
which will be generated by the park on weekends ar,d holidays and thus traffic
congestion problems will be minimized.
It must be emphasized that any impact on the environment which would result
from construction of the proposed park project is so minimal considered
relative to any alternate land use plan - that the growth inducing factors
which can be considered have a net effect of being beneficial to the environment.
References Used in Preparing the Environmental Impact Statement:
1. San Diego County Regional Parks Implementation Study
2. IREt~I Natural Resources Inventory
3. San Diego County Planning Department Files
4. San Diego County Department of County Engineer Files
5. San Diego County Department of Sanitation and Flood Control files
6. California State Division of Highways files
7. Environmental Impact Statement previously prepared by Jones/Peterson
Associates, Inc.
8. Sweet~vater Regional Park Master Plan Study prepared for the County of
San Diego.
fl~PARTb{~NTAL CORR~SPCND~NC~
DATE: May 7, 1973
TO: Bob Bourcier, Assistant City Manager
~'~
FROM: Emerson Hall, Director of Parks & Recreation
SUBJECT: Environmental Impact Statement for Sweetwater Regional Park
I have reviewed the attached statement and discussed this project with
Mr. Carl Pippin, Real Property Division, County of San Diego.
I feel that we should recommend the acceptance of this report to the
Council as requested by rir. D. K. Speer, Administrator, Public Works
Agency, thus moving this Regional Park one more step toward development.
EH:amp
C~.~y o~ Chu.~a Vt~S.ta, Ca~~,~orcn~.a
A 111 '
• ~;~~
~;