HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1972-6648Form No. 342
Rev. 9-71
RESOLUTION NO. ~~aR
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA, APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA AND THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO RELATED TO SWEETWATER
RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT COST DISTRIBUTION
AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that that certain agreement
between THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a municipal corporation, and
THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, related to the Sweetwater River Flood
Control Project cost distribution
dated the 31st day of October , 19 72 , a copy of
which is attached hereto and incorporated herein, the same as though
fully set forth herein be, and the same is hereby approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chula
Vista be, and he is hereby authorized and directed to execute said
agreement for and on behalf of the City of Chula Vista.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
~~
~~~-~ c~
~,
Lane F. Cole, Director-of Public George D. indberg, City Attorney
Works
ADOPTED AND APPROVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CHULA
VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 31st day of October 1972 by
the following vote, to-wit:
AYES : Councilmen Hyde, Egdahl, Scott, Hobel, Hamilton
NAYES : Councilmen None
ABSENT: Councilmen None
~~ ~~ ~Y
ayor of the City of Chula Vi to
ATTEST ? ~ >
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I- City Clerk of the City of
Chula Vista, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above is a full, true
and correct copy of Resolution No. and that the same has not
been amended or repealed. DATED
City Clerk
< ..
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
AND THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this 31st day of October ~
1972 by and between the COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, hereinafter referred to as
COUNTY, and the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, hereinafter referred to as CITY is made
pursuant to authority of Chapter 5, Article 1 (commencing with Section 6500)
of the California Government Code (Joint Powers Agreement): _
W I T N E S S E T H: •
WHEREAS, the United States Government has, under authority of
Public Law 90-483, approved August 13, 1968, undertaken design and cons-
truction of a flood control project in San Oiego County, California, known
as the Sweetwater River Flood Control Channel, Bonita Mesa Road to San
Diego Bay, hereinafter referred to as "Project," and
WHEREAS, on April 20, 1965 County adopted Resolution No. 60
agreeing to act as the sponsoring agency representing local interests,
including the City, in giving the assurances of cooperation required by the
United States Government in support of "Project" and the assumption of
certain designated obligations; including providing, without cost to the
United States, of all necessary rights-of-way; performing all necessary
construction, modification or relocation of highways (including bridges),
utilities, and irrigation and drainage facilities required in connection
with "Project"; and maintaining and operating "Project" in accordance with
regulations to be prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; and
-~~~~
WHEREAS, the proposed location of the flood control channel is along
the alignment adopted by the California Highway Commission for construction of
State Route 54 Freeway including interchanges for Interstate Routes 5 and 805,
and
WHEREAS, an agreement will be negotiated between the State of California,
Division of Highways, hereinafter referred to as "Highways," and the United States
Army Corps of Engineers to cover construction of aforesaid State Route 54 and
"Project" under one contract administered by "Highways," and
WHEREAS, County will acquire certain rights-of-way necessary for con-
struction of "Project", and
WHEREAS, "Highways" will relocate and reconstruct or arrange for the
relocation and reconstruction of existing streets, bridges, utilities, and irriga-
tion and drainage faci 1 i ti es made necessary by 'the construction of the joint flood
control and highway project, and
WHEREAS, County will negotiate an agreement with "Highways" concerning
t the reimbursement to "Highways" of cost for the relocation and reconstruction of
existing streets, bridges, uti 1 i ti es, and irrigation and drainage faci 1 i ti es
located within the limits of "Project" at an estimated local cost of $2,800,000;
and ~ 1
WHEREAS, State of California, Department of Water Resources, hereinafter
referred tows "OWR", will make reimbursement for all necessary rights-of-way; and
for all costs in the relocation and reconstruction of existing streets, bridges,
utilities, and irrigation and drainage f~.;ilities within the limits of the "Project"
right-of-way, except for rights-of-way not necessary for "Project" or for any
excesses of equivalent replacement over the existing facilities, such excesses
considered betterments, and
-?
4 i:1 `~~
WHEREAS, any rights-of-way not necessary for "Project" or any
modifications other than equivalent replacement of streets, bridges, utilities,
and irrigation and drainage facilities under the City's jurisdiction required
solely due to the construction of "Project" are considered betterments and
Lherefore the responsibility of the City to the County as Administrator of
"Project," and
WHEREAS, on April 6, 1965, City adopted Resolution Number 3668
whereby it requested County to give the assurances required by the United
States to provide the local cooperation necessary for the construction of
the project, and further, agreed to make payment to County for those non-
reimbursable costs, considered betterments, in the reconstruction of streets,
bridges, utilities, and irrigation and drainage facilities,
NO-W, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows:
SECTION I
L
COUNTY AGREES:
1. To acquire all necessary rights-of-way and relocate utilities for '
"Project" not covered by Cooperative Agreement between the County and
"Highways," dated Piarch 17, Ig70.
2. To prepare plans and specifications for relocation and reconstruction
of existing streets, bridges, utilities, and irrigation and drainage
facilities located within the limits of "Project" and not covered by'
the aforementioned Cooperative Agreement between the County and
"Highways" covering construction and maintenance of bridges.
____ __
-3-
3. To cause to be constructed the aforesaid relocation and reconstruction.
~+. To bear any nonreimbursable costs for aforesaid rights-of-way, relocation
and reconstruction within the unincorporated area of the County.
S. To make all necessary negotiations and agreements with the United States
Government for the maintenance of "project" including the flood control
channel and appurtenances within the flood control channel right-of-way.
b. To furnish the City prior to April 1 of each year an estimate of its
share of maintenance costs for the subsequent fiscal year for all
improvements other than channel crossing structures, lying within
"Project" right-of-way.
SECTION II
CITY AGREES:
1. To bear that share of the rights-of-way costs within the City limits
l
of Chula Vista that are determined to be nonreimbursable by "DWR".
2. To bear that share of costs for relocation and reconstruction of existing
streets, bridges, utilities and irrigation and drainage facilities within
the City limits of Chula Vista that are determined to be nonreimbursable
by "OWR" .
3. City shall pay to the County 30% of the cost of maintaining all improvements
other than aforementioned channel crossing structures, lying within the
flood control channel right-of-way.
-4-
--~ ~ ,
?i
4. City shall deposit with the County prior to July 15 each year City's
share of the aforementioned maintenance cost.
It is understood that in the event actual costs exceed the amount of
the deposit, that City will pay the difference between the deposit and
the actual cost of City's share. In the event the actual cost is less
than the deposit, County will refund to City the difference between
the actual cost and the amount of said deposit. In any case a detailed
audit will be supplied City upon request.
SECTION III
IT IS MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED;
1. The determinations of "DWR" concerning reimbursability will be binding
on all parties to this Agreement.
2. That neither County nor any officer or employee thereof shall be
~ responsible for any damages or liability occurring by reason of anything
done or omitted to be done by City under or in connection with any work,
authority or jurisdiction delegated to City under this Agreement. It
is also understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section
895.4, City shall fully indemnify and hold County harmless from any
liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code Section
810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by
City under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction
delegated to City under this Agreement.
$. That neither City nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible
for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or
_~ ~1 ~ J,` ,'~,~j ,
~~
omitted to be done by County under or in connection with any work,
t
authority or jurisdiction not delegated to City under this Agreement.
It is also understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code
Section 895.4, County shall fully indemnify and hold City harmless for
any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code Section
810.$) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by
County under or in connection with any work authority or jurisdiction
not delegated to City under this Agreement.
That the provisions of this Agreement and its execution shall not be
effective or binding upon City unless other related agreements essential
to completion of the project are duly executed by County with the
agencies listed below:
4.
AGENCY
City of National City
TYPE OF AGREEMENT
Bridge Reconstruction and
Channel Maintenance
Port District
State of California, Division of
Highways
Channel Maintenance
Bridge Reconstruction and
Maintenance
5. In the event of any changes in the boundaries of the unincorporated area,
the City of Chula Vista or the City of National City, the percentage of
channel maintenance costs stated in Section II-3 will be adjusted to
reflect such changes.
-6-
.~ ` _~ ,
,,~
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 'the parties hereto have caused this Agreement
to be executed by their properly authorized officials.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ATTEST
By r~~~ r.~.`, -. ~c,~ ~:.rL ~.. PORTER CREMANS
%'Chairman Bcsard of Supervisors• Cierk, Board of Supervisors
~'1'~ ~ - ~ _ ,.-~
~ Deputy
CITY OF CHULA VISTA ATTEST
,---~ •
Deputy
B ~ ~?~ ~ ~ -City Clerk
'~~~
Tit 1 e MAYOR By~ ,~. ~ - v ~--~
s
Date October 31, ~,9Z2 , _
`,
c. _
APPROVED AS TO FORM;
• ~ 61 ~:' .a :... ~ ~ ~
-..
l
County Counsel ..Deputy •
..
~~ ~ ~~
i ty Attorney
7- __