Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1975/01/07 Item 11AGENDA ITEM N0. [ 11 ) CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF: January 7, 1974 ITEM TITLE: INITIATED BY: BACKGROUND Resolution - Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract ~'or the Construction of Drainage Improvements in Sequoia Street Between Oleander Avenue and Olive Avenue, Gas Tax Project 20~ Director of Public Works/City Engineer l On December 24, 1974 at 11:00 A.M., the Director of Public Woks received formal bids in the Council Chambers for drainage impx'ove- ments in Sequoia Street between Oleander Avenue and Olive Avenue as follows: 1. A B C Construction Co., Inc. San Diego 2. R. S. Construction Co. San Diego 3. Virgil Woolard Co. La Mesa 4. Fazio Construction El Cajon (See Supplemental Sheet 1) ATTACHED: Resolution [K] Ordinance [ ] Agreement [ ] Plat [ ] Proposal 1 Proposal 2 Broposal 3 $14,270.50 $12,409.00 $12,120.85 None $13,900.00 None None None None $15,633.25 $16,235.00 $15,980.00 5. Scheidel Corp. $18,760.00 $17,969.50 $22,330.00 La Mesa 6. G. R. Henderson Contractors, Inc. None $19,800.00 $19,736.25 San Diego See EXHIBITS ~X] No. 1 Financial Statement: Lowest Responsible Bid $12,120...85 Contingencies l 212.15 Total Project Cost 13,333.00 Funds Budgeted in Account 28-6100-209 $15 000.00 Commission-Board Recommendation: ' N.A. Department Head Recommendation: 1. City Council accept bids and award contract to A B C Construction Co., Inc, in the amount of $12,120.85 for Proposal 3. 2. City Council authorize the expenditure of $13,333.00 from C3as Tax Account 28-6100-209 City Manager Recommendation: Concur S~/ ITEM NO. 11 Supplemental Sheet 1 ~~ Proposal 1 Proposal 2 Proposal 3 7. E1 Cajon Grading & Eng. Co. E1 Cajon None $28,615.00 Npne Engineer's Estimate $12,370.00 $12,625.00 $12,625.00 The low bidder of Proposal 3 is A B C Construction Co. with a bid of $12,120.85. The low bid is 4~ below the engineer's estimate. $15,000.00 is budgeted in tYie Gas Tax Program, fiscal year 1974-75 for this project. Proposal 1 --- is for 30" corrugated metal pipe, 14 gage, fully bituminous lined. Proposal 2 -- - is for 30" reinforced concrete pipe, 1350-D Proposal 3 -- - is for 30" Asbestos Comment Pipe, Class 1500, Type II ~ ~ 1 Form No. F-229 12fi3 CERTIFICATE rJF CITXfiIhECTCR CF 'Ii1AI~CE Certification ox Ur_a~r~-o_nx`iatec! Ba3_a*:~.e I HEFLFPl' CEFTIFY that t'.l° mcny requi;:e3 fcr the appropriation of funds for t'.le purpose aet forth in the attached resolution i S a'Jall*xr:lE: 7-•^• tR0 `~'r'E3.^aU: ;', Or ZS ~nt1C17a'i.ed t0 come into t;le Treasury, and is cr?-:e~~rise unappropriated. Amount $ Purpose Bidder Furd Dirtct~r o~ Finance !the f~.}•}Y O~ ~,Illlla ~fl.at Date ''~' 1_erti.fi.catior, of Jr~encu^~:^ered B,iance I FiEF~ ~`I CERTIr that the incebtecsr~ess and cbl.zgation to be ir_c:~:r.°ea by 'she contrazx or reezr~e~n` a.utro'-ized h1 the attache+a resaiui:ion can bti incurr~.r. wlrzicut t}ie vielatian of any -~ oz Cam, ~ t,. Of trio Ai0'JiS:.0:;0 C file i~la]=tar Oi: tP.E ~:i~~ .+~l~a Vi.~ 1.• Oi Lii~ Z"(3^.a't1.~.litZC:a O~ t::;~ i3M7~ Of ~P_O ` ta::.°. G` ~~'i'.i=0'ii i~v ~.L1a'`i. sur=:.Cleat mOP_;.e5 t'i?.V° ne°_i: a~~.rC3r%'."3ate~ ~0-~ tl:c3 _.~i'_yr;OSE' CL ,:,~3.1Ci Fiy contract, that suf_ ion: r•;o:lie~ t^ ^+eet. t'r..e o::'_icztion= of tht contract are a•^tuaily in the irea:u:~y, or are ar_ticigater.. to comp' lnt0 the '_'reasury t'7 '`i":= Ci Gd11.: Oi ?'~e ~~ppx'oPriaticn rrO:ri Which the same are '-o be dra`+~n, and thGt saic', r^orie~ z:ow actually, i:l the Treasury, ~toret::er Witzl '~3'1E mon~.es anti cirated to come into the TreusurY, to the credit: of said 3rrrGrx.:.ation are ottzerw:.se uzlencuznbered. Amount D?ot to Excee; $ 13,333.00 Date 12/31/74 BY ./ -' ?~,~~. r- ,'"'ii.~~_`C't`..0 Of Fin[~'..laG• T:la Ci`~y of Caula ~'i~a+:a Fund 28 6100 209 Dept./F~cti~%ity PL=pose Drainage Improvements in Sequoia Street Bidder A B C Construction Company, Inc, ~~~. ~ }'