HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1975-7979
„~ ~. ~;.
RESOLUTION NO. 7979
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA ACCEPTING REPORT AND PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO
THE 1975-76 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND PROVIDING
FOR THE SPECIAL APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR THE PURPOSES
SET FORTH IN THE REPORT
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has prepared modifi-
cations to the 1975-76 Capital Improvement Program as contained in
Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as
if set forth in full, dated December 4, 1975, and
WHEREAS, said modifications include the construction of the
Municipal Golf Course parking lot expansion within the General Fund,
5 new Gas Tax projects, increased funding for 5 additional Gas Tax
projects and the elimination of 4 Gas Tax projects and an expansion
of the street overlay program, and
WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works recommends that the
City Council accept the report and said proposed modifications and
make the necessary appropriations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Chula Vista does hereby accept the report dated December 4,
1975 for the recommended modifications to the 1975-76 Capital Improve-
ment Program.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the sum of $82,000 is hereby
appropriated from the unappropriated surplus of the General Fund;
$106,500 is hereby appropriated from the unappropriated surplus of
2107 Gas Tax Funds; and $298,000 is hereby appropriated from the
unappropriated surplus of 2106 Gas Tax Funds for the purpose set
forth hereinabove.
Presented by
errs' . /~
William J. Ro ens, Director of
Public Works
Approved as to form by
l ~ ,,
.~~ ~'%%
George D. Lindberg, City Attb'rney
• a•
~ADOPIED A~dD APPROVED 3Y THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CI3ULA VISTA, CALIFORTIA this 16th day of December ,
197 5 by the following vote, to--wit:
AYES: Councilmen Hyde, Egdahl, Scott, Hamilton
~1AYES: Councilmen Hobel
AI3SETIT : Counci Zmen None
Mayor of the City of Chula Vista
ATTEST
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss.
CITY OF CFTULA VISTA )
I, JENNIE M. FULASZ, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista,
California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full,
true and correct copy of
that the same has not been amended or repealed.
DATED
City Clerk
(SEAL)
CC-660
and
7~ ~y
~ ~ EJtH1~1T
~ .
RECOMMENDED MODIFICATIONS TO THE
1975-76 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
December 4, 1975
Public Works Department
Engineering Services Division
Advance Planning Section ~
Prepared by : ~~,~~ o~. ~;i~-,~U,~it-
Approved by ~ 1 _,~7 _r~?~~i-r~--'~
Directq~'r of Public Works
Date
~~~/
•
I.
II.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this report is to recommend modifications to the
1975-76 Capital Improvement Program so as to most effectively
utilize available funds.
DL~l~llhR*RT TTT T T T /1wT _
It is recommended that the 1975-76 Capital Improvement Program be
modified as shown on the table below:
Currently Proposed Required Source
Project Budgeted Budget Appropri- of
No. Description Amount Amount ations Funds
General Funds
GF-10 Civic Center Development $715,670 $633,670 -0-
*GF-11 Municipal Golf Course
parking lot expansion and
modifications -0- 82,000 +82,000 General
Gas Tax Funds
*GT-47 Claire Ave. & H St. improve-
ments -0- 25,000 +25,000 2106
*GT-48 Traffic signal, Melrose &
Orange -0- 35,000 +35,000 2107
*GT-49 Telegraph Canyon Road, I-805
to Otay Lakes Rd., prepara-
tion of R/W maps -0- 35,000 +35,000 2106
*GT-50 Telegraph Canyon Rd., Hale-
crest Dr. to 800' w/o
Brandywine, pavement over-
lay and widening -0- 112,000 +112,000 2106
*GT-51 Traffic signal modernization -0- 20,000 +20,000 2106
**GT-21 5th Ave. storm drain s/o
Center Sta 17,00'0 37,000 +20,000 2106
**GT-24 4th Ave. storm drain, "E"
St. to Memorial Way 42,000 67,000 +25,000 2106
**GT-4 5th Ave. storm drain, "J"
to "K" St. 61,000 77,000 +16,000 2107
**GT-30 Orange Ave. landscaping 49,000 128,000 +79,000 2106
**GT-36 East "H" Sty landscaping 21,000 28,000 + 7,000 2106
~g_~ 9 . .
• -2- •
Currently Proposed Required Source
Project Budgeted Budget Appropri- of
Noo Description Amount Amount ations __ Fur~ds__
***GT-1 I-5/54 interchange con-
nection to Tidelands Ave.,
construction $200,000 -0- -0-
***GT-18 1st Aveo storm drain s/o
Sierra Way 8,300 -0- -0-
***GT-26 "H" St., I-805 thru Plaza
del Rey 123,000 -0- -0-
***GT-35 Traffic signal, 1st Ave.
& "F" Street 22,000 -0- -0-
****GT-45 Street overlay program 58,500 114,000 +55,500 2107
* New Projects
** Currently budgeted projects requiring additional funds.
*** Project being dropped.
**** Work shown in Gas Tax Maintenance portion of the budgeto
III. BACKGROUND:
Since City Council approval of the budget, several events have taken
place which affect availability of funding construction in regard
to the Capital Improvement Programo These events include cancellation
of some previously approved projects, changes in relative priorities
of projects, and budget modifications as directed by the Council.
IV. DISCUSSION:
A. Source of Funds:
1. General Fund:
The Council, at the time of budget hearings, directed the
staff to include monies for the improvement of the Municipal
Golf Course parking lot. Inclusion of the funds was to be
made later in the fiscal year after a preliminary study
and estimate were preparedo The funds were to be transferred
from the monies appropriated for the Civic Center development
(GF-10)o The estimated cost of the work is $82,000. There-
fore, we are recommending formal approval of this project
through transfer of funds from those approved for the Civic
Center development.
20 Gas Tax Fund:
Voters rejected the Plaza del Rey plan at the May 28, 1975
election Therefore, the construction of "H" Street east
7~ ~ 9
• _- •
of I-805 will not be undertaken during the 1975-76 fiscal
year, and no City participation in construction costs will
be required. The 1975-76 Gas Tax budget includes $123,000 i
for "H" Street from I-805 through Plaza del Rey (450 acre
portion). Such amount should logically be released for use
in a project of recognized need.
The State Department of Transportation has advised the City
that the construction of the ramps connecting Tidelands
Avenue and the I-5/54 interchange has been delayed. $200,000
is currently budgeted for these rampso Such amount can now
be released for utilization in other projectso
A minor storm drain project in First Avenue, south of Sierra
Way was approved in the 1974-75 budget in the amount of
$8,3000 Subsequently, a detailed plan and estimate have
been prepared for the project, The cost is now estimated
at $16,1500 The drainage problem is not of sufficient
magnitude to justify the expenditure of this increased
estimated cost. It is recommended that the project be
deleted from the current Capital Improvement Program.
Currently there is budgeted $22,000 for the construction
of a traffic signal at the intersection of First Avenue
and "F" Street. Based on a recent study of traffic signal
priorities, this intersection rates No. 8 on the priority
list. It is proposed that the traffic signal at Melrose
Avenue and Orange Avenue (No. 2 priority) be substituted
for the 1'ir$t and "F" signal.
On July 1, 1975 the City had an uncommitted balance in the
Gas Tax fund of $88,610. This amount, when combined with
the amounts available through postponing or dropping various
projects, creates an available balance of $441,910.
The following is a summary of funds available for con-
struction of additional projects this yearn
Source of~Funds (All Gas Tax Funds)
a. "H" St., I-805 to Plaza del Rey
b. I-5/54 interchange connection to
Tidelands Avenue
c. First Avenue storm
Sierra Way.
d. Traffic signal, 1st
e. Uncommitted Gas Tax
July 1, 1975)
drain, south of
Ave. & "F" St.
funds (as of
B. Proposed Use of Available Funds:
Amount
$123,000
200,000
8,300
22,000
88,610
$441,910
In assessing the need for the construction of new Gas Tax
projects, a review of not only the existing C.I.P. and traffic
X971
• -'- •
signal priority list was initiated, but also a review of
conditions which might require possible new projects was
undertaken. This included street widening and/or maintenance
projects, storm drain construction, sewer installation, land-
scaping projects and bicycle path construction.
Within each category, prioritization could generally be
accomplishedo However, prioritizing different construction
categories such as a landscaping project against a traffic
signal project was very difficult. Both objective and sub-
jective benefit-cost decisions can be made for street, storm
drain and sewer construction. Therefore, for example, the
elimination of the First Avenue storm drain because the
estimated construction cost increased twofold was readily
accomplished. However, such benefit-cost analysis cannot be
done on landscaping projects such as the Orange Avenue and
East "H" Street median island landscaping. My philosophy in
retaining these projects within the proposed C.I.P. budget
is based essentially on the fact that the Council has adopted
a policy of landscaping major streets and has approved street
standards which indicate median island landscaping on major
streets. Therefore, this landscaping is just as integral to
the street construction as the pavement and sidewalk, and the
installation of the landscaping completes the street improvements.
It will be noted that the only new traffic signal recommended
for construction is the signal at idelrose and Orange. The
reason for this is that even though there are several inter-
sooticns ::hick ;~arrunt traffic signals, an iinnecassary pro-
liferation of traffic signals can increase congestion and
thereby increase accidents. At the present time there are 53
traffic signals in the City and 4 are under design for con-
struction this year. Neither the congestion nor the accident
rates of the other signals on the list, in my opinion, require
the installation of a traffic signal at this time. If traffic
increases, it may well be that all of the intersections will
be signalized, however, in a few years.
If the City Council wishes to install more traffic signals,
my first recommendations would be to install signals at the
intersections of Second Avenue and "I" Street and Second Avenue
and "G" Street. Even though these signals ranked 7 and 8 on
the priority list, they meet the accident warrants at this
time and have a high accident rate over the past 4 years. My
personal philosophy for traffic signal installation is to
place emphasis on accident reduction.
A new major project which is recommended is improvement of
Telegraph Canyon Road between Halecrest Drive and a location
800' west of Brandywine Avenue. This project is recommended
due to the repetitive periods of congestion on Telegraph Canyon
Road just east of Interstate 805 throughout the school year.
At the present time 3 lanes of_ traffic (2 on "L" Street and
1 from the freeway) are attempting to merge into one lane all
at one pointo The widening will provide an appropriate area
7~ 79
• -_- •
for merging, Additionally, we would have proposed the •re-
construction or overlay of Telegraph Canyon Road in this area
in the next fiscal year budget (approximately $50,000 project)
due to its rapidly deteriorating pavement condition. This ~
project combines widening and overlay into one project.
1. New Projects:
The only new project utilizing General funds is the P4unicipal
Golf Course parking lot expansion and modification. Funds
for the construction of this project are being transferred
from those approved for the improvement of the Civic Center
complex, as per Council direction.
A proposed list of new projects utilizing Gas Tax funds was
developed after a detailed review of the total 6-year
Capital Improvement Program. Some of the projects which
were considered for funding include:
*a. Claire Avenue and "H" Street improvements
*b. Traffic signal, Melrose and Orange
*c. Telegraph Canyon Road, I-805 to Otay Lakes Road,
preparation of R/W maps
*d. Telegraph Canyon Road, Halecrest Drive to 800'
west of Brandywine, pavement overlay and widening
*e. Traffic signal modernization
f. Storm drain in Fourth Avenue from "J" to San Miguel
Drive
g. Modification of the computer for our traffic signals
so that left hand turn movements could be regulated
h. Construction of a center island median in "L" Street
between Maria way and Nacion Avenue
i. Construction of various traffic signals having high
ranking on the priority rating system
Those projects marked by an asterisk have been included
in the proposed Modified Capital Improvement Program.
The remaining projects are considered to be of lesser
priority, but are still of importance and will be considered
in the prbposed 6-year Capital Improvement Program which
will be prepared early next year.
Project descriptions and justifications are included in
Exhibit "A" for all projects listed aboveo The traffic
signal priority ranking is also included.
2. Additional Funding:
Several currently budgeted projects require additional funds.
The reasons for this include:
7y ~~
• -s-
r
~J
a. Increased estimated cost due to inflation
bo Availability of better estimates based on detailed plans
c. Increases in extent of work over that originally planned
The projects requiring additional funds are identified by
2 asterisks in the recommendation and include 3 storm drain
projects and 2 landscaping projects for a total amount of
$147,000.
3. Summary of Proposed Expenditures:
a. Funds for new projects $227,000
b. Additional funds for currently budgeted
projects 147,000
c. Additional funds for Gas Tax maintenance
portion of the budget 55,500
$429,500
-V. CONCLUSION:
Significant changes have occurred since approval of the Capital
Improvement Program. Formal modification of that program appears
justified.
~1 ~I 'I 9
EXHIBIT "A"
Municipal Golf Course Parking Lot Expansion and Modifications:
1.
A. Description of Work:
The project includes placing a 1" AC overlay on the existing
parking lot; expansion of existing parking lot. to accommo-
date an additional 150 cars; installation of landscaping
and irrigation; and additional parking lot lighting..
B. Project Justification:
The existing parking lot is inadequate to handle the present
number of cars. Excess cars are now parking in the dirt
field just southwesterly of the existing lot.
C. See attached sketch.
Claire Avenue and H Street Improvements:
2.
A. Project Description;
This project includes the installation of a pedestrian sig-
nal at the intersection of Claire Avenue and H Street.
Openings in the existing block wall will be constructed to
provide access for pedestrians.
Fs. Project Justification:
Many students living northerly of H Street who attend Hilltop
High School presently have to travel a round-about way to
school due to the recent construction of H Street and asso-
ciated walls. Construction of this project should eliminate
this inconvenience and certain hazards connected with the
existing installation. This project is considered to be of
relatively high priority because of the intense public
interest involved, the speed and volume of H Street traffic
and the probability of serious accident in the absence of
positive measures.
Traffic Signal at Melrose and Orange
3.
A. Description of Project:
Install traffic signal with intersection safety lighting.
B. Project Justification:
Based on a recent study for determining traffic signal
priorities, this intersection was No. 2 on the priority
list. The signal will provide for safe traffic movements
through the intersection of Melrose and Orange. Such move-
ments are now difficult because of the relatively high traf-
fic and pedestrian volumes entering the intersection.
X19 rJ rJ
• ~ Exhibit "A"
Page 2
4. Telegraph Canyon Road, I-805 to Otay Lakes Road, Preparation
of Right of Way Map:
A. Project Description:
This project involves the preparation of a Record of Survey
map for the proposed City alignment of Telegraph Canyon
Road. The map would tie together existing ownerships of
of parcels of record, existing road surveys, and the pro-
posed alignment for the road. Along with this Record of
Survey map, a right of way map for the roadway and channel
will be prepared. Legal descriptions for all parcels of land
necessary will also be prepared.
B. Project Justification:
Prior to the City's acquisition of rights of way for Tele-
graph Canyon Road and channel, said maps will be necessary.
The preparation of such maps will also be of great value to
developers planning to develop adjacent properties so that
precise ricrht of way dedications can be made at time of
development. The desire for development along Telegraph
Canyon Road seems to be increasing and the demands for this
service are becoming more important.
5. Telegraph Canvon Road, Halecrest Drive to 800' West of
Brandywine, Pavement Overlay an Widening:
A. Project Description:
This project will involve widening and overlaying the exist-
ing pavement (generally 24' wide) to a total width of 40'
between Oleander Avenue and Brandywine Avenue.. This will
provide for one travel lane and a bicycle lane on each side
of the road. Between Halecrest Drive and Oleander Avenue
the existing improvements will be removed entirely and new
improvements installed to provide for: a free right hand
turn movement from I-805 freeway going easterly on Telegraph
Canyon Road; the construction of one through lane and bicycle
lane in each direction; and the installation of a temporary
paved center median.
B. Project Justification:
Due to the increased traffic volume on Telegraph Canyon Road,
the existing pavement is failing. Lack of the proposed over-
lay and widening will resu_t in high maintenance costs and
potentially dangerous roadway conditions. The installation
of bike lanes will provide for a much safer area for bicycle
traffic. A portion of th expense of the widening will be
paid with LTF funds allocated to the City for the purpose of
providing adequate bicycle facilities along Telegraph Canyon
Road.
C. See attached sketch.
7979
• Exhibit "A"
Page. 3
6. Traffic Signal Modernization:
A. Project Description:
This program is intended to modernize existing signalized
intersections by adding pedestrian signal heads.
B. Project Justification:
These intersections are in areas of high pedestrian activity,
and/or close to school for pedestrian safety. Intersections
to be modernized include:
1. Third and Davidson
2. Third and G
3. Fourth and G
4. Fourth and H
5. Broadway and D
6. Third and F
7. Storm Drain in Fourth Avenue from "J" Street to San Miguel Drive
A. Project Description:
Construct various sizes of culverts, inlets and cleanouts.
Modify existing intersection of Fourth and K Street to
eliminate cross gutter.
B. Project Justification:
The construction of this storm drain is part of the overall
J Street storm drain system. Its construction will eliminate
the continuing maintenance problem with a cross gutter at
Fourth Avenue at K Street. This cross gutter will be removed
and the intersection modified to provide for a smooth riding
surface. The project will further eliminate several minor
drainage problems through utilization of the J Street storm
drain.
8. Modification of the Comouter for Traffic Signals to Provide
Regulation of Left TLrn Movements
A. Project Description:
Install and modify hardware and software to existing traffic
signal control computer to enable it to monitor and control
signalized intersections having separate left-turn phase.
System-wide modifications at intersection are to permit
future phase expansion.
B. Project Justification:
This modification will enable system to monitor and control
multiple-phase and pre-timed signals. Smoother traffic
flow will be gained through the installation of these modi-
fications in the computer system.
~9 7y
i
•
Exhibit "A"
Page 4
9. Construction of a Center Island Median in "L" Street Between ~
Maria Way and Nacion Avenue
A. Project Description:
Construct PC'C island, an average of 5' wide and approxi-
mately 1,100' in total length. i;rect 4' chain link fence
on island in critical areas. Install flashers in end of
island as appropriate. Adjust manhole covers and erect
signs.
B. Project Justification:
The site distance on L Street between Monterey and Mission
is inadequate for the prevailing speed on L Street. Con-
struction of this island and fence will prevent left turns
at the critical intersections, and prevent crossing of L
Street by pedestrians in critical areas. Such preventative
actions will lessen the potential hazard.
~47y
~ ~
~ ~ ~
!
~i o:
I ~~ ~~
I~
i
cue
HOUSE
_I ~('fi#~ffi~H~~~i°
~~u ~~-~+N~II~+I~'-~'~~~~,
- f-
CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE
e
Pf~OPOSED EXPANSlCPS OF PAPKlNG LOT
_I
I
.,
l
I
I
~ ~
~ ~
I
,
/ ~
\\
~ S~ALF
\ ~ ~~
~ : 8~,
. \ `_ _ -
_.- -- //
~,=s, . ~;.~.
~\.,•: ~
~j
,~' : ': i
•
i I
1
~
, j
`
I
1~ !<
it
I ~~
~ 1 ~~ j I ~ ~ ~' V ~,
G r ' ~'
r
^T::-.cam , - -- _ a
i!'~ . ~ .v
~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~
t~ -- ~ ~ -~ - ~ ~ %f `~ !~~
i _ _ r _ ~~ ~ v ~. y. ~.~A ~'~,; ~ '_~
F1 I}
it ~ - - S I I F/
~~ ~ k, ~~ -~ 1~ ~ ./
~~- (~
`_~cr ~.
~ ~ - ~ - ~- ~
I~ ~ .. ------ .__ ~ ~ ~~~/
~,__ , ~ t~ A ~, ~ ~ ~, ~--
~. ~~ ~/ r~ ~ ~ i
-J I --J I- l-- r ~~ i i
I I fff ~2 III ~ ~ ~ .~
_ ~ ~~ ~
i~ I if lr 'f ~r i J -`Vi' ~~---
k
-J ~ i
~._ l~ F - ,_ ~ -------
~ i ~
~~ ci _ 1fjl rte'--~-'~ _ ~: ~ . II) ~ !Ili - - „-
~.C~ PER 2.5. 10$ce
._, ~
2 7 I ~?. -T
7_0~ 14~ 2v'
~,
i i~ s
't'-f t° I C A O S E C'T 1 01V
•
i
~,~~ -.
i,t
1
1
1
1
~ .ro~~a
1
i '
EX IST. t~VMT. .--
,,
N. 5.
1 co 12 '} 1 Z ~+
"tVPtcA` SECT tofu
ELF'. Or Ot_EA13~CR AVE .
Revised Drown ~~~ Date 11- is-mss ~~ ~-~~ OF CF! UL~ !/f STA..
Approved Date _ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTF."ENT
~9h
Director of f ubtic Works
T EL EG RAP1-~ C A.N~ . 2p, Number
F'tZOM l- 80°5 TU $Ob F'T,
W. OF 1~.2ANUVWIN~ AVE.
iii oi,-
V/aS21 ES
--~
E.>clST, PV MT,
3:1 }C
SURV
Y FOR aI'+, _
1`=F C SI
Nt~L5 _ __
• rrp.
T•iinimurc: of Minimum Coord. 6 Fos-
~ Vehclr. Contin. Ped. Move- Acci- sii~1L,
Volume Traffic Volume ment dent Combin. Total
Points Intersection Warrant ~iarrant Warrant tiv'arrant Warrant Tn'arrant w'arrant~
17 Teleg.Can.Rd. & Oleander (Crest) Yes Yes Ito N/A Yes Yes 4*
15 Orange & T:elrose Yes Yes Yes N/A No Yes 4*
14 hilltop & East Orange Yes Yes No N/A IVo Yes 3*
13 ~dooc:lawn & "g" Yes Yes No No No Yes ?
13 Jefferson & "E" Yes Yes i~1o No No Yes
13 Teleg.Can.Rd. & Otay Lakes Rd. Yes Yes No N/A No Yes 3*
12 2nd and "I" No No No Yes Yes Yes 3
12 2nd and "G" No No Ito Yes Yes No 2
12 Hilltop & Oxford No No No Yes Tv'o Yes 2
12 1st and "F" No No No Yes No Ye.s 2
12 2nd & Quintard No No No T~/A ado Yes 1*
11 telegraph & Brandywine No 1'es No TJ/A No Yes 2*
11 2nd and "J" No No No Yes Yes i1o
10 lst and "J" TJo No No Yes No Yes 2
8 Fsroadway & Flower (74) ZJo Yes :1o No Yes Ito 2
2nd & "~:" (74) No No IQo Yes Yes No .2
5th & "D" No No No Yes P1o No I
Bay Blvd. & "J" (74) No No No Igo No No 0
E. Rienstra & Max (74) No i~Io No N/A No No 0
ani: Points
Intersection
L'. IJaples & Melrose (74)
E. Palomar & idelrose (74)
E. "L" & Melrose (74)
2nd & Palomar (74)
Bay Blvd. & "L" (74)
Bonita Glen & Bonita Rd. (74)
4th & Center
1st & Palomar
"H" Street & Oaklawn
Minimum
Vehclr.
Volume
Warrant
P1o
IIo
TJ o
No ~
iJ o
3
No
Interrp.
of
Contin.
Traffic
Warrant
TJ o
TJ o
No
No
IJ o
TJo
Minimum
Ped.
Volume
CJarrant
No
No
No
PJ o
No
No
Coord.
Iviove-
ment
Warrant
N/A
Id/A
N/A
N/A
No
N/A
Yes
N /A
N/A
Acci-
dent
Warrant
TJ o
No
No
IJo
No
No
No
No
No
Combin.
Warrant
TJ o
No
Td o
No
No
No
6 Pos-
sible,
Total
i~;arrants
0
0
0
0•
0
0
1
0
0
* 5 Possible
N/A Not Applicable
ANNUAL BUDGET
1975-76 CAPITj;L IMPROVEMENT .PROGRAM
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
Number Cost
Code Fundin Description Estimate Total
General Fund
GF-3 Addition to Data Processing 6,000
GF-4 General Roca Park Improvements. 40,000
GF-5 Deer Park (Candlewood) Park Development 10,000
GF-6 Storm Drain, Quintard Street W/0
Second Avenue 30,000
GF-7 Garden Park (Southwestern College) Phase I 42,000
GF-8 Storm Drain, Halecrest Drive @ Telegraph .
Canyon Road 35-,000
GF-9 Storm Drain, Hilltop Drive @ Telegraph
Canyon Road 45,000
GF-10 Civic Center Development 715,670
923,670
Local Transportation Funds (2)
LT-1 Bicycle Route Improvements 24,800
24,800
Park Development Funds
PD-3 Elmhurst Phase II 21,000
PD-4 Creg Rogers Improvements, Lou!er Section Phase I 19,000
40,000
State Bond Act Funds
~ SB-1 Rohr Park Improvements 146,000
SB-2 Greg Rogers Improvements, Lower Section Phase I 31,000
177,000
TOTAL 1975-76 C.I.P. EXPENDITURE ESTIMATE 1,165,470
CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
217
Form A-141 i
79 79 _ ___ _._..
ANNUAL BUDGET
1975-76 CAPITAL Ih1PROVEMENT PROGRAM
EXPENDITURE SUh1h1ARY (CONTINUED)
Cost
Fundin Description Estimate Total
Sewer Income Fund
Rosebank Sewer Participation-Additional Funds 7,000
7,000*
Gas Tax Funds (Construction Onl
Annual Sign Replacement Program 8,000
"H" Street, I-805 through Plaza dei Rey
(450 acre portion) 123,000
Oleander Avenue x~,ension, Greg Rogers Park 78,000
Street Liyi;t~~ng, Broadway, "E" Street to
"F" Street 29,000
Hili±op Drive Improvements at Main Street 24,000
Orange Avenue Landscaping 49,000
"J" Street Improvement, Broadway to Third
Avenue, Additional Funds 14,260
Glover Avenue N/O "C" Street, Additional Funds 12,000
Otay Valley Road R/~J Acquisition, Third
Avenue to I-805. Additional Funds 35,000
Traffic Signal, Telegraph Canyon Road and
Oleander Avenue 35,000
Traffic Signal, First Avenue and "F" Street - 22,000
East "H" Street Landscaping 21,000
Storm Drain, Fourth Avenue S/0 "C" Street 13,000
Pedestrian Signal Heads 20,000
423,260*
TOTAL 7975-76 C.I.P./GAS TAX EXPENDITURE ESTIMATE 1,595,730
*Gas Tax Funds and Sewer Income Funds are appropriated
in separate budget sections and are shown in the C.I.P.
program for display purposes only.
` CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
Form ~ ~ 1~9 _ .
218