Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1987-13307 Revised 10/28/87 RESOLUTION NO. 13307 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR FIELDSTONE CLASSICS, CHULA VISTA TRACT 87-12 The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby resolve as follows: WHEREAS, the applicant, the Fieldstone Company, proposes to develop 60 residential lots on 10.107 acres located on the south side of Lakeshore Drive, and WHEREAS, the EastLake Master Environmental Impact Report, EIR-81-3, and the EastLake I SPA Plan Environmental Impact Report, EIR-84-1, have been prepared and address the environmental impacts of the proposed project, and WHEREAS, on September 23, 1987, the Planning Commission by a vote of 5-0, with two members absent, voted to approve the subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, pursuant to Section 66473.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, the tentative subdivision map for Fieldstone Classics, Chula Vista Tract 87-12, is found to be in conformance with the various elements of the City's General Plan based on the following: 1. The site is physically suitable for the residential development and the proposal conforms to all standards established by the City for such projects. 2. The design of the subdivision will not affect the existing improvements -- streets, sewers, etc. -~ which have been designed to avoid any serious problems. 3. The project is in substantial conformance with the Chula Vista General Plan Elements as follows: a. Land Use - The proposed 60-unit project is in conformance with the EastLake SPA Plan, which permits residential development with a density range of 5-15 dwellings per acre. The proposed subdivision would have a density of 6 dwellings per acre. -1- b. Circulation - The subdivision with two access points, from Lakeshore Drive, is in compliance with the circulation element of the EastLake SPA Plan. c. Housing - The detached small lot housing product proposed is consistent with surrounding development. d. Conservation - The project is located on a site which has already been graded for development. e. Park and Recreation, Open Space - The project is a component of the EastLake Community, which has designated areas within EastLake Hills and Shores totalling 148 acres reserved for open space, and 23.8 acres reserved for parks. f. Seismic Safety The closest identified fault in the area is the La Nacion Fault located over two miles to the west. g. Safety - The site is within an acceptable response time of fire and police services. h. Noise The units will be required to meet the standards of the UBC with regard to acceptable interior noise levels. i. Scenic Highway The project will create two linear open space lots with theme walls along Lakeshore Drive. j. Bicycle Routes The streets within the project are not designated bike routes but will accommodate bicycle travel. k. Public Buildings - No public buildings are planned for the site. 4. Pursuant to Section 66412.2 of the Subdivision Map Act, the Commission certifies that it has considered the effect of this approval on the housing needs of the region and has balanced those needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City and the available fiscal and environmental resources. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said subdivision is hereby approved subject to the following conditions of approval: -2- 1. The developer shall dedicate to the City all the streets shown on the Tentative Map within the subdivision boundary for public use. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the construction of full street improvements in all the streets shown on the Tentative Map within the subdivision boundary. Said improvements shall include, but not be limited to: A.C. pavement, base, concrete monolithic curb, gutter and sidewalk, sewer and water facilities, drainage facilities, fire hydrants, street lights and signs. 3. All work within the public right-of-way shall be done in accordance with the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, the San Diego Area Regional Standard Drawings and the Design and Construction Standards Of the City of Chula Vista. 4. Lots shall be so graded as to drain to the street. Drainage shall not flow over slopes. 5. Sewers serving 10 or less units shall have a minimum grade of 1%. 6. An erosion and sedimentation control plan shall be prepared as part of the grading plans. 7. The land incorporated in this project lies within EastLake Assessment Districts 86-1 and 85-2. Participation in those districts is required as specified in Resolutions 12288 and 12546 of the City Council. The developer will be responsible for all costs incurred by the City for the redistribution of assessments. The exact amount shall be paid prior to the approval of the Subdivision Map. 8. A vertical curve of 125 feet (minimum length) is required in Meadowbrook Lane to account for the 7.5% (percent) grade break. 9. The developer shall grant to the City a one-foot control lot at the south end of Creekwood Way. This should be done by a separate instrument and will be considered by the City Council concurrently with the approval of the Subdivision Map. 10. Prior to the approval of the Subdivision Map, the developer shall submit preliminary plans demonstrating the feasibility of extending Creekwood Way south of the Subdivision boundary. -3- 11. The developer shall grant to the City street tree planting and maintenance easements along all public streets within the Subdivision. Said easements shall extend to a line 10 feet from the back of sidewalk. The west side of Creekwood Way is exempt from the above requirement. However, the 4.5-foot parkway shall be landscaped and irrigation subject to the approval of the City Landscape Architect, and included in the Master EastLake Homeowners Association Landscape Maintenance District. 12. The developer shall enter into an agreement with the City wherein developer agrees to do the following: a. Pay his fair share of the cost of public improvements to be provided under the "Public Financing Plan", Phasing Plan and Development Agreement as needed for access. b. Not protest the establishment of a Facilities Benefit Assessment District. Said District will allow the developer to anticipate future reimbursement by other benefiting parties. 13. Open Space Lots B and C shall be fenced and landscaped subject to review and approval by the City Landscape Architect and shall be included within the master landscape maintenance district for EastLake. 14. The rear property boundary for lots 38 through 42 shall be fenced in accordance with the wall details shown on the site plan submitted. Lots 43 through 60 shall be fenced at top of slope with gate access on the east side of Creekwood Way adjacent to the rear yard of Lot 60, in accordance with the wall details design submitted. Slope areas at the rear property boundary between Lots 43 through 60 shall be landscaped with drought resistant plant materials as approved by the City Landscape Architect. An open space easement over those slope areas shall be granted to the City and shall be maintained by the master landscape maintenance district for EastLake. Other methods of satisfying the space and slope design requirements may be permitted subject to the approval of the Planning Director. 15. Detailed development standards which include tabulation of the exact lot size and coverage for -4- each lot as well as proposed standards for setbacks, building height, lot coverage and floor area ratio shall be submitted as a single document for review and approval by the Planning Department and shall be recorded concurrently with the final map. The following development restrictions shall be included within the standards: a. Lot coverage shall be limited to 40%, excluding open sided patios with an area not greater than 300 square feet. b. Future additions to all residential lots shall be limited to the first story only, c. The maximum allowable floor area ratio shall be 50%, excluding open sided patios with an area no greater than 300 square feet. d. Building height shall be limited to 28 feet in accordance with current R-1 standards. 16. Revise the map to show adequate access for fire vehicles to serve Lot 30, subject to review and approval by the City Fire Marshal, prior to approval of the final map. 17. Show wall details on the site plan submitted of the extension of the theme wall separating Lot A (proposed park entry) from Lots 26 and 27. 18. Proposed street names for the subdivision must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to approval of the final maps. In the event that proposed street names are determined to be not approved, the developer shall submit alternate names. 19. Developer shall meet the Crossroads/Developers Coalition thresholds as they currently exist or may be amended contingent upon this not being in conflict with the Development Agreement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following will be required under the authority of the Chula Vista Municipal Code: 1. The developer shall pay Traffic Signal Participation Fees in accordance with City Council Policy prior to issuance of building permits. 2. The developer shall pay all applicable sewer fees, including but not limited to Sewer Participation Fee, prior to issuance of building permits. -5- 3. The developer shall underground all utilities serving the subdivision. 4. All grading work shall be done in accordance with the City of Chula Vista Landscape Manual and Grading Ordinance 1797 as amended. 5. The developer shall comply with all applicable sections of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. Preparation of the Final Map and all plans shall be in accordance with provisions of the Subdivision MaP Act, Subdivision Ordinance and the Subdivision Manual of the City of Chula Vista. 6. The developer shall plant trees along all dedicated streets within the subdivision. The species, location and number shall be determined by the City Engineer. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby certify that EIR-81-3 and EIR-84-1 have been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and that the City Council has reviewed the information contained in each EIR prior to making a decision on the project. Presented by Approved as to form by 3476a ,' -6- ADOPTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ~-..JLA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this ..27th d~y of OcCober ........ 19 87 , by the following vote, to--wil: AYES: Councilmembers Malcolm, Cox, i~oore, Nader NAYES: Counci 1 members Hone ABSTAIN: Councilmembers McCandliss ABSENT: Councilmembers None ATTEST (~_,.~,...,.;,-.,,/ "'9"<"' City i:lel;k ,,~ 5, ~TE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss. CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, JENNIE M. FULASZ, CMC, CITY CLERK of the City of Chulo Visto, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY thor the obove ond foregoing is 0 full, true ond correct copy of RESOLUTION N0, 13307 ,ond that the same has not been amended or repealed DATED ~ City Clerk Cl'h' OF CHULA VISTA CC-660 CITY OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT IAPPLICANT'S STATEMENT OF DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN OWNERSHIP INTERESTS ON ALL APPLICATIONS WHICH WILL REQUIRE DISCRETIONARY ACTION ON THE PART OF THE CITY COUNCIL, PLANNING COMMISSION AND ALL OTHER OFFICIAL BODIES. The following information must be disclosed: .~ 1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the application. The Fieldstone Co. List the names of all persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. The Fieldstone Co. 2. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership. ~pifh ,]nhnqnn Peter Ochs 3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust. N/A 4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of C~ty staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes__ No X If yes, please indicate person(s) Person is defined as: "Any individual, firm, copartnership joint venture, association, soc.'6'~y~T club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate,'trust, receiver, syndicate, this and any other county c~ty and county, city n~un~c~pal~ty, d~str~ct or other , her group or combin'ati'on ac ." ' S e of applicant/date WPC 0701P u~',~ A-110 P~int or type name of applicant