Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1975-7846RESOLUTION TQO. 7846 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA FINDING NO SIGTI2FICAIdT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT DUE TO THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY NEAR THE SOUTHLAESTERLY CORNER OF THIRD AVENUE AND "H" STREET FOR THE SOUTH BAY COURTHOUSE AND RELATED FACILITIES The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby resolve as follows: P7HEREAS, an application for Initial Study has been filed by the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista on June 9, 1975 for the acquisition of properties for court facilities located near the southwestern corner of "H" Street and Third Avenue, and WHEREAS, public notice of said project has been given in accordance with the Environmental Review Policy of the City of Chula Vista, and U7HEREAS, the Environmental Review Committee has examined the Initial Study application, together with the staff report and public input, to determine any possible significant adverse environ- mental affect in accordance with CEQA and the guidelines promulgated by the Secretary for Resources, and WHEREAS, said Environmental Review Committee has recommended to the City Council of the City of Chula Vista that a Negative Declar- ation be filed in accordance with the findings contained therein, and 4dHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista has considered all the aforementioned reports and environmental documents and adopts said reports and documents as the record of the environmental review for this project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista as follows: 1. That the City Council of the City of Chula Vista finds in accordance with the recommendation of the Environmental Review Committee that the project known as the acquisition of properties for South Bay Municipal Court facilities will not have any possible significant affect on the environment and that the attached Negative Declaration, incorporated herein by reference, has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. 2. That the Environmental Review Coordinator is hereby authorized and directed to file said Negative Declaration with the County Clerk, subsequent to the preparation of a Notice of Determination on the project. Presented\\by Approved as to form by D. J. Pet/ o_n, Director of George D D~ berg, City Attorn~ Planning ADOPTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 29 day of July 19'75 by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: Councilmen Scott, Hobel, Hyde, Egdahl NAYES: Counei7.men None ABSENT: C'ounc-i Zmen None ABSTAIN: Manor Hamilton Mayor of the City of Chula Vista ATTEST ~71 ~ ~_ _ _ City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss. CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, JENNIE Mo FULASZ, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, California, DC HEREBY CERTIFY that the abcve and foregoing is a fu2Z, true and correct copy of that the same has not been amended or repealed, DATED iSEALI CC-660 ty Cler and ~~y6 cccccc /~ July 21, 1975 ~~c•l •~. To: Lane F. Cole, City Manager ~fr~~ Via: Eugene Asmus, Assistant City Manager From: D. J. Peterson, Director of Planning Subject: Negative Declaration on South Bay Court site acquisition Nature of Project This project consists of the acquisition of approximately 11.73 acres for the possible location of court facilities for the South Bay Judicial District. Only acquisition is being reviewed at this time. 4dhen more specific development plans are available it vaill be possible to determine what, if any, impacts will result from the physical project itself. The County at that time will subject the project to additional environmental review. Project Setting The project is located near the southwest corner of Third Avenue and N Street (see attached plat); Mankato Street bisects the property. The site contains a drug store and a structure used for a furniture store which was previously a supermarket. Much of the site north of Mankato is now paved for parking while the area south of Mankato is vacant but sometimes used for such temporary uses as Christmas tree sales and amusement facilities. Land uses in the area of the project include office and retail oriented toward Third Avenue and N Street with single family and multi-family cons titutiny a preponderance of the balance of the immediate project area. There are no geological hazards on or near the site, the nearest earthquake fault is the Sweetwater, some 1~ miles to the east. Soil conditions are adequate for substantial structures. The property is quite level with no substantial drainage problems. There are no unique biological, archaeological or historic resources present. There are no mineral resources, ground water or flood plains and the urban support system is adequate in this area. The site is in the urbanized area of Chula Vista and is void of any significant resources or hazards. 3. Project Description The project requiring this Initial Study is the acquisition of the 11.73 acres of partially developed land as described in paragraph 1 above. The redevelop- ment of this property for court purposes will be subject to additional environ- mental review when more precise development plans have been prepared. The County will then be the lead agency. Environmental Review Committee On June 19, 1975 the Environmental Review Committee (IS-75-38) of the possible significant impacts of t property. The Conmiittee found that there would he impact and forwarded a Negative Declaration to the Board for their concurrence and to the Council for conducted an Initial Study he acquisition of this real no possible significant County Environmental Review their consideration. 7~'~~ page 2 Environmental Review Board (ERB) On July 10, 1975 the County ERB examined the that it would not have a substantial adverse notification of concurrence with the Negative D. J. Peterson Director of Planning DJP:DDR:hm Attachment proposed acquisition and found environmental impact. The Declaration is attached. ~~~~ q~~ ~ ~~ --.halals - 1,~~ -- -- ~ - -_~_ u I u o I o a ---- V N `o -- v o I V I- A _ I I u ~ Y I ~ I -------- I 4 1 0 l o I 1 N O 0 i //~y~ $ .. J~ / 6 N I I I ~' I I I r~ I I I 1 I I I I 00-001-C L3 I I 11 ~ ~-- Y ^I" OI-0 I i --.-_ 01-C LG I i GO-001-G L3 T _-- --- I D I p l 5, I N I '~ U r------- ~ I i I o ~ so-ool-cLC I u ` ~' ~---- r-l t' I N I GO-o01-CL9 • o ~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ `~ F------- i ZO-001-C L9 I Y O I O I O I I ~ ~ 1 4 1 41 I I r---~---- ~, I li I C I I I I lo-ool-c+.G I I I _- __ I i J I - ~_ __-_ T _ ". i I1-060-CLS I i GG-OGO-GLS I r I 1 2E--0 0-SLry Rs~. i ~---~---- 7Z-O<(Z-f1'i ~ LZ-O£O-G c T I ----- ' I L ~ F - +- -- 6 Z-C'd0-G.Li --- -- ~ e ~ N I I vd.. ry~.._c. ~.I u I OG-OGO-GL9 6Z-OGO-CLS YL-OGO-GL'3 ~ IZ-OGO-CLS N i _r o i a I ~ I n I o ~ V I OL-OCO-CLO nI - 139a1u - IIHB- ~~ /'~ I ;i ~~~ CUtJN'1'~' OF SAN ll1l~:GU INTER-DEPA RTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE o~~~ July 10, 1975 T0: City of Chula Vista Real Property/Law and Justice Agency County Clerk FROD1: Environmental Review Board NOTIFICATION OF CONCURRENCE iPITti NEGATIVE DECLARATION: SOUTH BAY JUDICIAL COURT FACILITIES, IS-75-38, Log #75-18-16, 11.73 acres, 3rd Ave. $ }i St., Chula Vista (Supv. Dist. I) This project, a request to allow the acquisition of 11.73 acres of land in Chula Vista for the location of court facilities for the South Bay Judicial District, has been examined by the Environmental Review Board and it is found that the proposed project will not have a substantial adverse environmental impact. Reasons for this finding: 1. The acquisition of land for future court facilities involves no construction or alteration of the physical environment at this time; therefore, no adverse environmental effects are foreseen. 2. Specific plans providing adequate details of future facilities have not been formulated; therefore, an Environmental Impact Report would not seem to be the appropriate vehicle for analyzing the environmental impacts of this proposed acquisition of land. NOTE: This concurrence with the Negative Declaration is applicable only to the proposed acquisition of land for this project. IPhen further details concerning the scope of this project are available the neces- sity of an Environmental Impact Report may be apparent. Additional copies of this Concurrence with Negative Declaration may be obtained in Room 260 of the County Administration Center, 1600 Pacific tliglnvay, San Diego 92101. Res ect£ully submitted, ~~ ~ DAVID C. NIELSE 'ecretary Environmental Review Board DCN : GAiV: l eb 7~y~ RECEIVED BY. JUI. Y 4 1975 ~rnrrn~ir;~c DEP,1R7}11Ei!r criu~n v!sr;a, cnuror~;ir,~ DRAFT flEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRON11EP11'AL IMPACT On June 19, 1975 a draft Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact was recon~menue ~y tie miironmental Review'Canmittee of the City of Chula Vista. The project is described as follows: The acquisition of 11.73 acres for the possible location of court facilitieS"f6~'t15"e-'S' u i a c i., . ~{~he,_.r ~w_•j_r_onreental documents trill be prepared as necessary when T.he project is defined. roJec~ ocat'-C- ion: ~I~~r- the south rest c~~~ of T}lird Aye,_ and H St. It is the finding of the Environmental Review Committee that the project will not hate a significant effect on the environment for the following reasons: a. The acquisition of this site will not have any impact on the natural environment because the site and the area around the site is in the urbanized area of Chula Vista and is void of any significant natural resource or hazard.. Nor Trill this project generate any pollutants that will have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, b, The project is in confo rniance with the long range goals of the City of Cicala Vista and Brill not therefore attain short term to the disadvantage of long range goals. c, The project trill not provide any system that could support secondary development that arould cumulate to a level of being substantial and adverse nor do any of the insignificant impact interact to a significant level. d, The project will not .result in the generation of any noise, air pollution, light, aesthetic blight nor any other hazard to the welfare nor health of any hwnan being, Information for the Initial Study was prepared by: -- City of Chula Vista Rox 1OF37 Clwla Vista, a The Initial Study An;,;ication and Evaluation is on file with the Environmental Review Coordinator of the City of Chula Vista and may be reviewed at the planning Department of the City of Chula Vista be tare en 6;00 a,m, and 5:00 p,m, •~ r Envi"ronme ' ~ Rrw" L'ooroi na or - CASE NUIif3ER IS-75-3II Date• June 19, 1975 7 ~yL EN 3 (rev. 3-20-75) • /_~ Case Ito. IS-75-38 Fcc $ -- Appendix A Receipt-7!o_ Date Reed -67977 , Accepted by N~~~r-- IGITIAL STUDY APPLICATIOfl t4 I, • APPLICAUT INFOI:FL1TIOIt A. Project Title Acquisition of properties for Court Facilities B. Project. Location (Street Address or Description) Southwest corner of H Street & 3rd Ave. L' D Pmject Description. The acqusition of property for the future use as a Courthouse an re a e acT T ies. Applicant (lame: City of Chula Vista City. Chula Vista, State CA Zip Phone 714-427-3300 x 231 rea Loa^ Agent/Preparer's flame: Address 276 / City Chula 1 Pf:one: 714-427-3300 x 231 (rea oe 0 ntal Revi Relation to Applicant Emplo eV e Ctuaiifications of Agent/Preparer B.A. Public Admin,t,4 yrs. profectiont~l Banning Pxnarianra- 7?~ yrc -TC/FTR nronwrat;nn F. and review Discretionary Act requiring review: g, General Plan Revision Rezoning/Prezoning_ Precise flan Specific Plan _ C.U.P. Variance Tentative ouu ivision ap_ Grading Plan Tentative Parce hiap Site Plan & Arch. Revtew Public Project Land _a_cquls Other Discretionary ct ~ --.. Enclosed or attached documents: (as required by Environmental Review Coordinator) Location 14ap_ Grading Plan Site Plan Tentative ~'uba~iap Parcel Flap Precise Plan Specific Plan Arcft. Elevations Landscape Plans Improvements Plans Soils Report Geological Stu y Ilydrological Study 6ioloyical Survey Archaeological Survey Noise Assessment Other r II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Acreage or square feet of land area included in the total project. 517,151 sq. ft. or 11.II7 Ac li. Residential (if comr~iercial or industrial; do not fill in this section) 1. Number of units with: 1 bedroom 2 bedrooms 3 bedrooms 4 bedrooms --'Total units: 2. Type Development (SF, TFD, multiple, townhouse, condominium) 3. Number of structures Height of structures (P~umber at what height) 4. Gross Density (DU/total acres) 5. Plet Density (DU/Ac minus any dedication) 6. Square feet of floor area(s) 7. Percent of lot covered by buildings or structures g, Number of parking spaces provided Percent of site in road and parking surface 9, Estimated sale or rental price range 10. Estimated project population C. Commercial or Industrial (if residential, do not fill in this section) 1. Type(s) oT ianu use 2. Floor area Height of structurej5j Lot Coverage (%) ' 3. .Type of construction used in the structure. 4. Describe major access points to the structures and the orien- tation to adjoining properties. 5, 6. 7. ~~~~ Number of parking spaces provided road and parking surface Estimated number of employees Estimated number of customers Occupancy load 49 "rercent of site in $. Estimated range of service area (miles) 9. Estimated number of one way auto trips per day generated by project. 10. Type/Extent operations not in enclosed buildings Hours of operation Type of exterior liyhting__ _ D. Projects other than above (if B or C filled in, du nct use this section) 1. Type of Project Purchase of land for eventual development as a Court facility 2. Type of facilities to be provided none at this time 3. Square feet of paved areas within project unknown 4. Parking Spaces provided none at this time 5. Square feet of enclosed structures unknown 6. ,Bulk of any structures unknown 7. Ultimate occupance of project unknown 8. ilumber of trips generated unkno:m 3. Supplemental Information (provide any information which could assist the City in evaluatiny the project.) This Initial Study is for the purchase of property only, once plans are formulated additional aoalvsis will be undertaken. E. Project Characteristics ' 1. Nill the operation of the project result in the wasteful, inefficient or unnecessary consumption of any scarce resources or energy? (If yes, identify and yive quantity) F!0 2, Provide the estimated consumption by the proposed project of the following resources: Electricity (per year) unknown at th;c r;mP ,Natural Gas (per yea r)_ unknno-m at th;c t;ma 4later (per day) flnknnwn at rhic tgmP 3, How much solid and liquid (sewage) waste will be generated by the proposed project?~~~1} Unknown ~t this time ~~y6 ~ + r;n 4, If the project could pollutants, identify applicable EPAj/1PCD compliance vri th the t!o result in tfie direct emission of any air them, provide the quantified to be emitted, regulations and data or evidence to show regulations. 5, Could the construction activities generate dust? (If yes, explain measures to be utilized to diminish adverse ffects). Unknown at this time, but only minor grading is like~y to 6. Could the project, in any phase, result in a significant increase in or impact on ambient noise levels? Unknown at this time - 7. Could the facility discharge any liquid into the bay or any other surfe.ce or sub-surface water source? (If yes, please describe the liquid and any applicable local, regional, state or federal re- gulations and data or evidence ±o shew compliance vrith the regulations.) g, Indicate type and amount (acres) of landscaping to be installed with the project. Unknovrn 9. If the project will result in any nevr employment opportunities, describe the nature and type of these jobs, Eventual development of the site will result in emp oyment but not at this time. 10. Could the project result in the emission of any substance or energy such as odor, vibration, glare or electrical disturbance? No 11. How many cubic yards of earth will be excavated? Unknown lio~u many cubic yards of ecibankment vrill be placed? Unknovrn 51~ ~~y~ What will be the - Maximum depth of cut Unknown Average depth of cut Maximum depth of fill-- __ " Average depth of fill " 12, Does the project. contain features which could be construed to be at variance from nearby features, due to bulk, fora, texture or color? (If sc, please describe.) No 13. If there is any direct or indirect automobile usage associated with this project, complete the following: No use with Total vehicle Emission Grams of acquisition miles traveledl Factor Pollution ~pe~ r -Ic a:/ j CO x 50 = Hydrocarbons x 6.5 = NOx (N02) x 5 Particulates -- ;: .58 - Sulfur x .20 = 14. Indicate the amount of developed and natural open space that is part of the project. Unknown 15. Could the project result in any change in such factors as age and income structure of the community, family size, occupation groups, etc? (If so, please describe.) rlo III. DESCRIPTION OF ENVIROPUtENTAL SETTING A. Geology Is the project site subject to any of the following? (If so, explain in detail). 1. ~~eismic Hazards 0 I. Auto trips per day (see Sec. IIC9) x range of service area (see Sec. IIC8 or an average trip length of 6 miles. 7 ~y~ 52 2, Liquefaction No 3, Land .Slide or Slippage No If a Geological Study has been conducted on the property, please attach. B. Soils Does the project site contain any of the following? (If so, explain in detail.) 1. Expansive Soils A minor amount of expansive soils may exist on this site, bu~T's~~fie nenera experience 1: afi-E~- 2. Alluvial Soils No 3. Erodible Soils No 4, Impervious Soils No If a Soils Report on the project site has been made, please attach. C. Hydroloq,Z ~ Water Qualitx .Are any of the following features present on or adjacent to the site? (If yes, please explain in detail) 1. -High ground eater fdo • 2. Flood Plain " Nn 53 7~' ~!b '3, Will the facility drain into any domestic t•rater supply cr marsh( (If so, please describe in detail the amount and run-off quality) 4. In what drai~~uge basin and sub-basin is the project located?2 N St, basin A-3.0, A-l.l ___ 5. What is the current & ultimate run-off in the basin & sub-basin?2 Current CFS Ultimate CFS 50 yrs. Basin: A-3.0 ~~_ ..Sub-basin: A-1.1 If there is any projected increase in run-eff, what percent will be due to the development of-the subject property? Are downstream drainage facilities adequate for the existing run-off? No If a Hydrological Study has been done, please attach. D. Mineral Resources 1. Are there any mineral resources on the project site? identify and rate scarcity) No (If so, 2. Does the project site provide access to or have the potentia l to provide access to any mineral resource? (If yes, describe in detail) Nn E. Land Form 1, Does the project site contain any prominent canyon, ridge line or other distinctive natural land form? No 2. What is the average natural slope of the site? ,< 5%_ ~ ~ 3. What is the maximum natural slope of the site? 2-3% F. Air Quality Is the project site near any air pollution sources such as a freeway or uncontrolled stationary source? (If yes, describe} No 2. See the "Pogo" report,on file in the Public Ilor6:s Dept. 5~I 2 ~~ G. Noise 1. Do any of the adjoininy streets have a current or projected AUT of 5,000 or mere or does any street ~rithin 500 feet of tJre site have a current or projected AUT of 7.5,000 or more? If yes, conduct an analysis of the noise impact on the project using the HUD Noise Assessment Guidelines, and attach the analysis to .this IS-or indicate why there. will be~np..adverse impacts. 2. Are there any generators of prominent noise levels (railroad, industries, etc.) in the area of the project which could impact the site? If so, please discuss. PJO H. Biology 1. Is the project site in a natural or partially natural state? 2. What are the predominant plant species found on the project site? 3. Are any of the above mentioned rare or endangered plant species (If yes, list) 4. Indicate type, size and quantity of trees which will be re- moved by the project. PJone present 5. What are the predominant animal species found on the project site? (Include any migratory species) Domestic 6. Are any of the above mentioned animal species identified as rare or endangered, or unique to the region: fir yes, IisL~ No ~~~ ~ 55 If a.3iological..Survey has been conducted, please attach. Ia Past Use of the Land J. North Retail commercial uses cos and resioentia ast ast oo restaurant, offices r ve. hest in9 e fame y mu ti-fami y uses ~py.~ K. Aesthetics 1. 1. Are there any known historical, archaeological or paleontolo- gical resources located on the project site? If so, describe 'the resources and proposed measures to conserve the resources, No 2, Are there any known historical, archaeological or paleontolo- gical resources v;ithin 2000 feet of the project site? If so, describe the resource and provide a map showing the location in relationship to the project site. No 3. If any surveys have been conducted, please attach. Current Land Use 1. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on the pro,iect site. 2. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on adjacent property. 2. Are there any features on or within 1000 feet of the site of substantial aesthetic importance? Is the project located adjacent to any scenic routes? If yes, describe the design tecF~niques being used to protect or enhance the scenic quality of Chula Vista. NO 5G L: Social 1. Are there any residents on the site? If so, liov+ many? rlo 2. Are there any employment opportunities on the site? If so, .how many and what type? Yes, clerical F. sales oersonel ti. Schools If the proposed project is residential, please complete the following: ~ ~ . Elementary Jr.-High Sr. Hiyh Current Current Students generated School Attendance Capacity from oroject I~, Parks and Recreation (Complete only if project is residential) 1. How many acres of park land are, necessary to serve the proposed project? (2AC/1000 pop.) 2. Hoti+ many acres of developed parkland are within the Park Service District of this project as shoa+n in the Parks & Recreation Element of the General Plan? 3, What is the current park acreage requirements in the park service district? 0. Safety 1. What is the distance to the nearest fire station and urhat is the Fire Dept.'s estimated reaction time? Less than 4 min, 2.. What is the gallons/minutes flow from ttie nearest number of hydrants as specified in the Safety Element of the General Plan?hydrants are located on H St., I St., 3rd Ave, and Mankato P. Transportation 1. Nhat roads provide access to the project? H St. and 3rd Ave. 57, 7~y~ 2. What is the current ADT and design capacity of these roads? 3rd Ave. 18,500 (1700 pk) 1972 N/0 H St. 3. What streets are to be dedicated and improved as part of the project?_ None Q, Public Facilities . 1.' Sewer - Location of tie-in point and lines 3rd Ave. H St. Size of existing and new line(s) ~~~ 2. Water - Location of tie-in' point and lines 3rd Ave. and H St. - Size of existing and nevr line s ~~ 3. Drainage - Location of on and off site facilities 30" line in Plankato collects and carries water nff sita Description of facilities and capacity 30" line __ Please provide any other information which could assist the City in evaluating the proposed project. 58 ~~~ CERTIFICATION , I ner/Owner in escrow* I, ~~ Consu tan t'` HEREBY, affirm that to the best of my kno~+ledge and belief, the statements and information herein contained are in all respects true and correct and that all known information concerning the project and its setting have been included in Parts II and III of this application for an Initial Study of possible environmental impact. *If acting for a Corporation; include capacity and company name. ' 59 ~~ nppendix a Project Evaluation 1. Evaluation of Environmental Impact which has the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or curtail the range of the environment. Yes No n. Could tl,e project adversely effect the quality of _ ' ground water to a significant degree: ,_ Reason for finding: No such resources are presen 6. Could the project increase the water level or velocity ~ - of water in a flood plain? _ ~ ,~ Reason for finding: No such resources are present 1 C. Could the p~oject significantly increase .the run-off • in any drainage basin? Reason for finding: There will be no increase in runoff due to this roiect, sere wi e no physical change to the site. D. Could the project increase run-off beyond the capacity of any natural ,rater-gray or man-made facility either on site or do,•rn stream?~ Reason for finding: There will be no increase in runoff due to this oroiect, E.' Could the project cause a substantial alteration of natural land form? ,_ _ Reason for finding: The grading of the prooert~.~ill maJ;p no chafes in the land form F. Could the project cause any significant erosiac, or ' siltation? _ ,~ Reason for finding: ThPro Trill he no in r as in runoff and dr~,pc~ facilltles ,fie available. G0 ~~~6 ~ .. c Yee. "No G. Could the project cause or exacerbate a violation of any national or state ambient air quality standard _ • o.r interfere +•rith the maintenance of air quality standards? Reason for finding: .The project will ot~irect v nor indirect v resu t in re ennssron o any new air contannnen H, Could the project result in a detrimental effect on water quality or the ability to attain or maintain water quality standards? ~ ~, Reason for finding: The runoff from this pro er v wi no e a tore nor increase y is pro,~ect. I. Could the project directly or indirectly cause a significant increase do ambient noise levels? ___ _ • Reason for finding: , The ac uisition of ro ert wi 1 have no effect on any am lent noise eve . ~ J. Could the project directly or indirectly affect a rare, endangered or endemic species of animal or plant; or ' habitat of such species; or cause interference t•+ith the movement of any resident or migratory wildlife? .__ _ ~ Reason for finding: No such resources are present K. Could the project directly or indirectly impact any arciaeological, historical or paleontological resource? Reason for fi.^.dir.;: ' No such resources are •p resent ' L. Could the project cause a significant degradation of community aesthetics by imposing structures, colors, forms, lights or other factors widely at variance with prevailing conm+unity standards? ._.._ Reason for finding: There will be no nhysica Grange o ~e pro~cc si e as a resu o ns acqursi ion o proper y. e ~~~6 ~ : G1 Ycs ' 't!o Ft. Could the project a•eate land uses that differ greatly from those on ad,iacent property due to either scale ._ or type? Reason for finding: There will be no direct Grange to an use ue to this project. tV. Could the project inhibit the ability of the urban support system to provide adequate support for the community or this project? Reason for finding: There will be no change in t e eman ore ee~nts o e ur an suppor system 0. Could the project result in wasteful, inefficient or unnecessary consumption of energy? Reason for finding: No significant change in the consumption of any ener _pro ucuiq resource or o energy to resu t rom t is P. Could the project result in the generation of a sub- stantial amount of solid or liquid waste whictr mould directly or indirectly cause a violation of any solid or liquid waste or litter regulations? Reason for finding: tlo change in waste prooducl- generation wi res~ rom n s acqu~si ion " Q. Could the project generate i:raffic that would signifi- cantly lower the service level of any street or highway below ar. acceptab]c level? .._._ ~ " " Reason for finding: • No traffic trill be genera e R.~ Are there any other impacts associated with the project tahich could have a potential to degrade the quality of tite environment or curtail the range of the environment? _ Reason for finding: • ..~ such resources are present 0 ,0 /~ • w G2 ,. 4 2. Evaluation of significant adverse environmental iiapacts which achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals. Yes No A. Is the project clearly inconsistent ~~ith the following elements of the General Plan? Land Use Circulation Scenic Highways Conservation • Flousing ~. Noise Park & Recreation Open Space Safety Seismic Safety Public Facilities Reason for finding: The rolect conforms to all elements of the General P an B. Could the project significantly inhibit access to any • mineral resources which can be economically extracted? .Reason for finding: No such resources are resent C. Does the project involve an area of presently or • potentiaiiy productive agriculiurai iand? . Reasons for finding: No such resources are present ._._._ L `_.__ ~ ~.. ..~ .L. ____ -,~- _.__.. D. Does the project involve any other natural or man-made feature ~•rhich is encompassed in long-term environmental goals as provided in the General Plan? Reason for finding? No such resources are present .... _. ~~~~ ~ •: •G3 •. r 3. Evaluation of adverse impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively significant. Yes No ' A. Could the project result in a series of impacts that •interact to produce significant effects? Reason for finding: ' The impacts due to is proJec are so mtnor utev prec uce any tnterac ton o a stgntttcan eve . B. Could the service requirements of the project result ' in secondary projects tftat could have cumulative effects of a significant level? • Reasons for finding: ' _ No substantial service requirements ti•rill be recess _:y • C. Does the project include any facilities or is the project being carried out under any circumstances that could facilitate, accelerate or induce other develop- mentl ~ .___ .Reasons for finding: ' The project trill not resu t to anv Increase in act tty to ~•rncn ~rou nave grro~r t acce era tnq c ac errs tcs . D. Are there any other impacts which could cumulate to a significant level? Reasons for finding: The impacts due to this nroiect are so minor tft v `preclude anv interaction to a significant leve c 4. Evaluatitin of significant impacts of the project which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. • Yes No A. Could the project involve tiie emission of any substance which could constitute a significant health hazard? _ Reason for finding: tlo such substances rn e enn tte y tie pro,7ect. Q. Is the project located in a flood plain oi• any other area subject to inundation? Reason for finding: No such feature is present C. Is the project site subject~to any geologic hazard such as earthquakes, land sliding or liquefaction? Reason for finding: ' No such feature is presen 0. Is the project site subject to any impacts such as noise, air pollution, light, etc, that could adversely IIffect human beings? ~ _ X Reason for finding: No such conflicts are presen in e pro,7ec se ing E. Could the project displace residents or people employed - at the site? Reason for finding: No such resource is present • F. Could any other adverse impact on human beings result `~- from the project? 1~ Reason for finding: No such conflicts are pr~seat in the oroiect Bettina ~• ~~~ 65'