HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1975-7846RESOLUTION TQO. 7846
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA FINDING NO SIGTI2FICAIdT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT DUE
TO THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY NEAR THE
SOUTHLAESTERLY CORNER OF THIRD AVENUE AND "H" STREET FOR
THE SOUTH BAY COURTHOUSE AND RELATED FACILITIES
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
P7HEREAS, an application for Initial Study has been filed
by the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista on June 9,
1975 for the acquisition of properties for court facilities located
near the southwestern corner of "H" Street and Third Avenue, and
WHEREAS, public notice of said project has been given in
accordance with the Environmental Review Policy of the City of Chula
Vista, and
U7HEREAS, the Environmental Review Committee has examined
the Initial Study application, together with the staff report and
public input, to determine any possible significant adverse environ-
mental affect in accordance with CEQA and the guidelines promulgated
by the Secretary for Resources, and
WHEREAS, said Environmental Review Committee has recommended
to the City Council of the City of Chula Vista that a Negative Declar-
ation be filed in accordance with the findings contained therein, and
4dHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista has
considered all the aforementioned reports and environmental documents
and adopts said reports and documents as the record of the environmental
review for this project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Chula Vista as follows:
1. That the City Council of the City of Chula Vista finds
in accordance with the recommendation of the Environmental Review
Committee that the project known as the acquisition of properties
for South Bay Municipal Court facilities will not have any possible
significant affect on the environment and that the attached Negative
Declaration, incorporated herein by reference, has been prepared in
accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as
amended.
2. That the Environmental Review Coordinator is hereby
authorized and directed to file said Negative Declaration with the
County Clerk, subsequent to the preparation of a Notice of Determination
on the project.
Presented\\by Approved as to form by
D. J. Pet/ o_n, Director of George D D~ berg, City Attorn~
Planning
ADOPTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 29 day of July
19'75 by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Scott, Hobel, Hyde, Egdahl
NAYES: Counei7.men None
ABSENT: C'ounc-i Zmen None
ABSTAIN: Manor Hamilton
Mayor of the City of Chula Vista
ATTEST ~71 ~ ~_ _ _
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, JENNIE Mo FULASZ, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista,
California, DC HEREBY CERTIFY that the abcve and foregoing is a fu2Z,
true and correct copy of
that the same has not been amended or repealed,
DATED
iSEALI
CC-660
ty Cler
and
~~y6
cccccc /~
July 21, 1975 ~~c•l •~.
To: Lane F. Cole, City Manager ~fr~~
Via: Eugene Asmus, Assistant City Manager
From: D. J. Peterson, Director of Planning
Subject: Negative Declaration on South Bay Court site acquisition
Nature of Project
This project consists of the acquisition of approximately 11.73 acres for the
possible location of court facilities for the South Bay Judicial District. Only
acquisition is being reviewed at this time. 4dhen more specific development plans
are available it vaill be possible to determine what, if any, impacts will result
from the physical project itself. The County at that time will subject the
project to additional environmental review.
Project Setting
The project is located near the southwest corner of Third Avenue and N Street
(see attached plat); Mankato Street bisects the property. The site contains a
drug store and a structure used for a furniture store which was previously a
supermarket. Much of the site north of Mankato is now paved for parking while
the area south of Mankato is vacant but sometimes used for such temporary uses
as Christmas tree sales and amusement facilities. Land uses in the area of the
project include office and retail oriented toward Third Avenue and N Street with
single family and multi-family cons titutiny a preponderance of the balance of
the immediate project area.
There are no geological hazards on or near the site, the nearest earthquake
fault is the Sweetwater, some 1~ miles to the east. Soil conditions are adequate
for substantial structures. The property is quite level with no substantial
drainage problems.
There are no unique biological, archaeological or historic resources present.
There are no mineral resources, ground water or flood plains and the urban
support system is adequate in this area. The site is in the urbanized area of
Chula Vista and is void of any significant resources or hazards.
3. Project Description
The project requiring this Initial Study is the acquisition of the 11.73 acres
of partially developed land as described in paragraph 1 above. The redevelop-
ment of this property for court purposes will be subject to additional environ-
mental review when more precise development plans have been prepared. The
County will then be the lead agency.
Environmental Review Committee
On June 19, 1975 the Environmental Review Committee
(IS-75-38) of the possible significant impacts of t
property. The Conmiittee found that there would he
impact and forwarded a Negative Declaration to the
Board for their concurrence and to the Council for
conducted an Initial Study
he acquisition of this real
no possible significant
County Environmental Review
their consideration.
7~'~~
page 2
Environmental Review Board (ERB)
On July 10, 1975 the County ERB examined the
that it would not have a substantial adverse
notification of concurrence with the Negative
D. J. Peterson
Director of Planning
DJP:DDR:hm
Attachment
proposed acquisition and found
environmental impact. The
Declaration is attached.
~~~~
q~~ ~
~~ --.halals - 1,~~ --
-- ~
- -_~_
u I
u
o
I o
a
---- V N
`o
-- v
o I V I- A _
I
I u ~ Y I ~ I
-------- I 4 1 0 l o I
1
N
O 0
i //~y~
$ .. J~ /
6 N
I
I I
~' I
I I r~
I
I
I 1
I
I I
I 00-001-C L3
I I
11 ~ ~--
Y
^I"
OI-0
I i --.-_
01-C LG I i GO-001-G L3
T _--
--- I D I p l
5, I N I
'~ U r------- ~
I i I o ~ so-ool-cLC
I u
`
~' ~---- r-l t' I N I GO-o01-CL9
•
o ~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ `~ F-------
i ZO-001-C L9 I Y
O I O I O I I ~ ~
1 4 1 41 I I
r---~---- ~,
I li I C I I I
I lo-ool-c+.G
I I I _- __ I i J
I
- ~_ __-_ T _ ".
i
I1-060-CLS I
i GG-OGO-GLS
I r
I 1 2E--0
0-SLry
Rs~. i
~---~----
7Z-O<(Z-f1'i
~
LZ-O£O-G
c T
I -----
'
I
L
~
F
-
+- -- 6
Z-C'd0-G.Li
---
--
~
e ~
N
I
I
vd.. ry~.._c. ~.I u I OG-OGO-GL9
6Z-OGO-CLS
YL-OGO-GL'3
~ IZ-OGO-CLS
N i _r
o i a
I ~ I
n I o ~
V I OL-OCO-CLO
nI
- 139a1u - IIHB-
~~
/'~
I ;i
~~~
CUtJN'1'~' OF SAN ll1l~:GU
INTER-DEPA RTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE
o~~~ July 10, 1975
T0: City of Chula Vista
Real Property/Law and Justice Agency
County Clerk
FROD1: Environmental Review Board
NOTIFICATION OF CONCURRENCE iPITti NEGATIVE DECLARATION: SOUTH BAY JUDICIAL COURT
FACILITIES, IS-75-38,
Log #75-18-16, 11.73 acres,
3rd Ave. $ }i St., Chula
Vista (Supv. Dist. I)
This project, a request to allow the acquisition of 11.73 acres of land in
Chula Vista for the location of court facilities for the South Bay Judicial
District, has been examined by the Environmental Review Board and it is found
that the proposed project will not have a substantial adverse environmental
impact.
Reasons for this finding:
1. The acquisition of land for future court facilities involves no
construction or alteration of the physical environment at this
time; therefore, no adverse environmental effects are foreseen.
2. Specific plans providing adequate details of future facilities
have not been formulated; therefore, an Environmental Impact Report
would not seem to be the appropriate vehicle for analyzing the
environmental impacts of this proposed acquisition of land.
NOTE: This concurrence with the Negative Declaration is applicable only to
the proposed acquisition of land for this project. IPhen further
details concerning the scope of this project are available the neces-
sity of an Environmental Impact Report may be apparent.
Additional copies of this Concurrence with Negative Declaration may be obtained in
Room 260 of the County Administration Center, 1600 Pacific tliglnvay, San Diego 92101.
Res ect£ully submitted,
~~ ~
DAVID C. NIELSE 'ecretary
Environmental Review Board
DCN : GAiV: l eb
7~y~
RECEIVED
BY.
JUI. Y 4 1975
~rnrrn~ir;~c DEP,1R7}11Ei!r
criu~n v!sr;a, cnuror~;ir,~
DRAFT flEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRON11EP11'AL IMPACT
On June 19, 1975 a draft Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact
was recon~menue ~y tie miironmental Review'Canmittee of the City of Chula Vista.
The project is described as follows: The acquisition of 11.73 acres for the
possible location of court facilitieS"f6~'t15"e-'S' u i a c i., .
~{~he,_.r ~w_•j_r_onreental documents trill be prepared as necessary when T.he project
is defined.
roJec~ ocat'-C- ion: ~I~~r- the south rest c~~~ of T}lird Aye,_ and H St.
It is the finding of the Environmental Review Committee that the project will not
hate a significant effect on the environment for the following reasons:
a. The acquisition of this site will not have any impact on the natural
environment because the site and the area around the site is in the urbanized
area of Chula Vista and is void of any significant natural resource or hazard..
Nor Trill this project generate any pollutants that will have the potential
to degrade the quality of the environment,
b, The project is in confo rniance with the long range goals of the City of
Cicala Vista and Brill not therefore attain short term to the disadvantage of
long range goals.
c, The project trill not provide any system that could support secondary
development that arould cumulate to a level of being substantial and adverse
nor do any of the insignificant impact interact to a significant level.
d, The project will not .result in the generation of any noise, air pollution,
light, aesthetic blight nor any other hazard to the welfare nor health of
any hwnan being,
Information for the Initial Study was prepared by: --
City of Chula Vista Rox 1OF37 Clwla Vista, a
The Initial Study An;,;ication and Evaluation is on file with the Environmental
Review Coordinator of the City of Chula Vista and may be reviewed at the planning
Department of the City of Chula Vista be tare en 6;00 a,m, and 5:00 p,m,
•~ r
Envi"ronme ' ~ Rrw" L'ooroi na or
-
CASE NUIif3ER IS-75-3II
Date• June 19, 1975 7 ~yL
EN 3 (rev. 3-20-75) •
/_~
Case Ito. IS-75-38
Fcc $ --
Appendix A Receipt-7!o_
Date Reed -67977
, Accepted by N~~~r--
IGITIAL STUDY APPLICATIOfl
t4
I, • APPLICAUT INFOI:FL1TIOIt
A. Project Title Acquisition of properties for Court Facilities
B. Project. Location (Street Address or Description) Southwest corner of
H Street & 3rd Ave.
L'
D
Pmject Description. The acqusition of property for the future
use as a Courthouse an re a e acT T ies.
Applicant (lame: City of Chula Vista
City. Chula Vista, State CA Zip
Phone 714-427-3300 x 231
rea Loa^
Agent/Preparer's flame:
Address 276 /
City Chula 1
Pf:one: 714-427-3300 x 231
(rea oe
0
ntal Revi
Relation to Applicant Emplo eV e
Ctuaiifications of Agent/Preparer B.A. Public Admin,t,4 yrs.
profectiont~l Banning Pxnarianra- 7?~ yrc -TC/FTR nronwrat;nn
F.
and review
Discretionary Act requiring review: g,
General Plan Revision
Rezoning/Prezoning_
Precise flan
Specific Plan _
C.U.P.
Variance
Tentative ouu ivision ap_
Grading Plan
Tentative Parce hiap
Site Plan & Arch. Revtew
Public Project Land _a_cquls
Other Discretionary ct
~ --..
Enclosed or attached documents:
(as required by Environmental Review
Coordinator)
Location 14ap_
Grading Plan
Site Plan
Tentative ~'uba~iap
Parcel Flap
Precise Plan
Specific Plan
Arcft. Elevations
Landscape Plans
Improvements Plans
Soils Report
Geological Stu y
Ilydrological Study
6ioloyical Survey
Archaeological Survey
Noise Assessment
Other
r
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A. Acreage or square feet of land area included in the total project.
517,151 sq. ft. or 11.II7 Ac
li. Residential (if comr~iercial or industrial; do not fill in this section)
1. Number of units with: 1 bedroom 2 bedrooms
3 bedrooms 4 bedrooms --'Total units:
2. Type Development (SF, TFD, multiple, townhouse, condominium)
3. Number of structures
Height of structures (P~umber at what height)
4. Gross Density (DU/total acres)
5. Plet Density (DU/Ac minus any dedication)
6. Square feet of floor area(s)
7. Percent of lot covered by buildings or structures
g, Number of parking spaces provided Percent of site in
road and parking surface
9, Estimated sale or rental price range
10. Estimated project population
C. Commercial or Industrial (if residential, do not fill in this section)
1. Type(s) oT ianu use
2. Floor area
Height of structurej5j
Lot Coverage (%)
' 3. .Type of construction used in the structure.
4. Describe major access points to the structures and the orien-
tation to adjoining properties.
5,
6.
7.
~~~~
Number of parking spaces provided
road and parking surface
Estimated number of employees
Estimated number of customers
Occupancy load
49
"rercent of site in
$. Estimated range of service area (miles)
9. Estimated number of one way auto trips per day generated by
project.
10. Type/Extent operations not in enclosed buildings
Hours of operation
Type of exterior liyhting__ _
D. Projects other than above (if B or C filled in, du nct use this section)
1. Type of Project Purchase of land for eventual development as a
Court facility
2. Type of facilities to be provided none at this time
3. Square feet of paved areas within project unknown
4. Parking Spaces provided none at this time
5. Square feet of enclosed structures unknown
6. ,Bulk of any structures unknown
7. Ultimate occupance of project unknown
8. ilumber of trips generated unkno:m
3. Supplemental Information (provide any information which could
assist the City in evaluatiny the project.) This Initial Study
is for the purchase of property only, once plans are formulated
additional aoalvsis will be undertaken.
E. Project Characteristics '
1. Nill the operation of the project result in the wasteful, inefficient
or unnecessary consumption of any scarce resources or energy?
(If yes, identify and yive quantity) F!0
2, Provide the estimated consumption by the proposed project of the
following resources:
Electricity (per year) unknown at th;c r;mP
,Natural Gas (per yea r)_ unknno-m at th;c t;ma
4later (per day) flnknnwn at rhic tgmP
3, How much solid and liquid (sewage) waste will be generated by the
proposed project?~~~1} Unknown ~t this time
~~y6 ~ + r;n
4, If the project could
pollutants, identify
applicable EPAj/1PCD
compliance vri th the
t!o
result in tfie direct emission of any air
them, provide the quantified to be emitted,
regulations and data or evidence to show
regulations.
5, Could the construction activities generate dust? (If yes,
explain measures to be utilized to diminish adverse ffects).
Unknown at this time, but only minor grading is like~y to
6. Could the project, in any phase, result in a significant increase
in or impact on ambient noise levels?
Unknown at this time -
7. Could the facility discharge any liquid into the bay or any other
surfe.ce or sub-surface water source? (If yes, please describe the
liquid and any applicable local, regional, state or federal re-
gulations and data or evidence ±o shew compliance vrith the
regulations.)
g, Indicate type and amount (acres) of landscaping to be installed
with the project.
Unknovrn
9. If the project will result in any nevr employment opportunities,
describe the nature and type of these jobs,
Eventual development of the site will result in emp oyment
but not at this time.
10. Could the project result in the emission of any substance or
energy such as odor, vibration, glare or electrical disturbance?
No
11. How many cubic yards of earth will be excavated? Unknown
lio~u many cubic yards of ecibankment vrill be placed? Unknovrn
51~
~~y~
What will be the - Maximum depth of cut Unknown
Average depth of cut
Maximum depth of fill-- __ "
Average depth of fill "
12, Does the project. contain features which could be construed to
be at variance from nearby features, due to bulk, fora, texture
or color? (If sc, please describe.)
No
13. If there is any direct or indirect automobile usage associated
with this project, complete the following:
No use with Total vehicle Emission Grams of
acquisition miles traveledl Factor Pollution
~pe~ r -Ic a:/ j
CO x 50 =
Hydrocarbons x 6.5 =
NOx (N02) x 5
Particulates -- ;: .58 -
Sulfur x .20 =
14. Indicate the amount of developed and natural open space that
is part of the project.
Unknown
15. Could the project result in any change in such factors as age
and income structure of the community, family size, occupation
groups, etc? (If so, please describe.)
rlo
III. DESCRIPTION OF ENVIROPUtENTAL SETTING
A. Geology
Is the project site subject to any of the following? (If so,
explain in detail).
1. ~~eismic Hazards
0
I. Auto trips per day (see Sec. IIC9) x range of service area (see Sec. IIC8
or an average trip length of 6 miles.
7 ~y~ 52
2, Liquefaction
No
3,
Land .Slide or Slippage
No
If a Geological Study has been conducted on the property, please
attach.
B. Soils
Does the project site contain any of the following? (If so,
explain in detail.)
1. Expansive Soils A minor amount of expansive soils may exist
on this site, bu~T's~~fie nenera experience 1: afi-E~-
2. Alluvial Soils
No
3. Erodible Soils
No
4, Impervious Soils
No
If a Soils Report on the project site has been made, please attach.
C. Hydroloq,Z ~ Water Qualitx
.Are any of the following features present on or adjacent to the
site? (If yes, please explain in detail)
1. -High ground eater
fdo
• 2. Flood Plain "
Nn
53
7~' ~!b
'3, Will the facility drain into any domestic t•rater supply cr marsh(
(If so, please describe in detail the amount and run-off quality)
4. In what drai~~uge basin and sub-basin is the project located?2
N St, basin A-3.0, A-l.l ___
5. What is the current & ultimate run-off in the basin & sub-basin?2
Current CFS Ultimate CFS 50 yrs.
Basin: A-3.0 ~~_
..Sub-basin: A-1.1
If there is any projected increase in run-eff, what percent will
be due to the development of-the subject property?
Are downstream drainage facilities adequate for the existing
run-off? No
If a Hydrological Study has been done, please attach.
D. Mineral Resources
1.
Are there any mineral resources on the project site?
identify and rate scarcity)
No
(If so,
2. Does the project site provide access to or have the potentia l
to provide access to any mineral resource? (If yes, describe
in detail)
Nn
E. Land Form
1, Does the project site contain any prominent canyon, ridge line
or other distinctive natural land form? No
2. What is the average natural slope of the site? ,< 5%_
~
~
3. What is the maximum natural slope of the site? 2-3%
F. Air Quality
Is the project site near any air pollution sources such as a freeway
or uncontrolled stationary source? (If yes, describe} No
2. See the "Pogo" report,on file in the Public Ilor6:s Dept.
5~I
2 ~~
G. Noise
1. Do any of the adjoininy streets have a current or projected AUT
of 5,000 or mere or does any street ~rithin 500 feet of tJre site
have a current or projected AUT of 7.5,000 or more? If yes,
conduct an analysis of the noise impact on the project using the
HUD Noise Assessment Guidelines, and attach the analysis to
.this IS-or indicate why there. will be~np..adverse impacts.
2. Are there any generators of prominent noise levels (railroad,
industries, etc.) in the area of the project which could impact
the site? If so, please discuss. PJO
H. Biology
1. Is the project site in a natural or partially natural state?
2. What are the predominant plant species found on the project
site?
3. Are any of the above mentioned rare or endangered plant species
(If yes, list)
4. Indicate type, size and quantity of trees which will be re-
moved by the project.
PJone present
5. What are the predominant animal species found on the project
site? (Include any migratory species)
Domestic
6. Are any of the above mentioned animal species identified as rare
or endangered, or unique to the region: fir yes, IisL~
No
~~~ ~ 55
If a.3iological..Survey has been conducted, please attach.
Ia Past Use of the Land
J.
North Retail commercial uses
cos and resioentia
ast ast oo restaurant, offices r ve.
hest in9 e fame y mu ti-fami y uses
~py.~
K. Aesthetics
1.
1. Are there any known historical, archaeological or paleontolo-
gical resources located on the project site? If so, describe
'the resources and proposed measures to conserve the resources,
No
2, Are there any known historical, archaeological or paleontolo-
gical resources v;ithin 2000 feet of the project site? If
so, describe the resource and provide a map showing the
location in relationship to the project site.
No
3. If any surveys have been conducted, please attach.
Current Land Use
1. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on
the pro,iect site.
2. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on
adjacent property.
2.
Are there any features on or within 1000 feet of the site
of substantial aesthetic importance?
Is the project located adjacent to any scenic routes? If
yes, describe the design tecF~niques being used to protect
or enhance the scenic quality of Chula Vista.
NO
5G
L: Social
1. Are there any residents on the site? If so, liov+ many?
rlo
2. Are there any employment opportunities on the site? If so,
.how many and what type? Yes, clerical F. sales oersonel
ti. Schools
If the proposed project is residential, please complete the
following:
~ ~ .
Elementary
Jr.-High
Sr. Hiyh
Current Current Students generated
School Attendance Capacity from oroject
I~, Parks and Recreation (Complete only if project is residential)
1.
How many acres of park land are, necessary to serve the
proposed project? (2AC/1000 pop.)
2. Hoti+ many acres of developed parkland are within the Park
Service District of this project as shoa+n in the Parks
& Recreation Element of the General Plan?
3, What is the current park acreage requirements in the park
service district?
0. Safety
1.
What is the distance to the nearest fire station and urhat
is the Fire Dept.'s estimated reaction time?
Less than 4 min,
2.. What is the gallons/minutes flow from ttie nearest number of
hydrants as specified in the Safety Element of the General
Plan?hydrants are located on H St., I St., 3rd Ave, and
Mankato
P. Transportation
1. Nhat roads provide access to the project?
H St. and 3rd Ave.
57,
7~y~
2. What is the current ADT and design capacity of these roads?
3rd Ave. 18,500 (1700 pk) 1972 N/0 H St.
3. What streets are to be dedicated and improved as part of the
project?_ None
Q, Public Facilities .
1.' Sewer - Location of tie-in point and lines
3rd Ave. H St.
Size of existing and new line(s)
~~~
2. Water - Location of tie-in' point and lines
3rd Ave. and H St.
- Size of existing and nevr line s
~~
3. Drainage - Location of on and off site facilities
30" line in Plankato collects and carries water nff sita
Description of facilities and capacity
30" line __
Please provide any other information which could assist the City in evaluating
the proposed project.
58
~~~
CERTIFICATION ,
I
ner/Owner in escrow*
I, ~~
Consu tan t'`
HEREBY, affirm that to the best of my kno~+ledge and belief, the statements and
information herein contained are in all respects true and correct and that all
known information concerning the project and its setting have been included in
Parts II and III of this application for an Initial Study of possible
environmental impact.
*If acting for a Corporation; include capacity and company name.
' 59
~~
nppendix a
Project Evaluation
1. Evaluation of Environmental Impact which has the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment or curtail the range of the environment.
Yes No
n. Could tl,e project adversely effect the quality of _
' ground water to a significant degree: ,_
Reason for finding:
No such resources are presen
6. Could the project increase the water level or velocity ~ -
of water in a flood plain? _ ~ ,~
Reason for finding:
No such resources are present
1 C. Could the p~oject significantly increase .the run-off
• in any drainage basin?
Reason for finding:
There will be no increase in runoff due to this roiect,
sere wi e no physical change to the site.
D. Could the project increase run-off beyond the capacity
of any natural ,rater-gray or man-made facility either
on site or do,•rn stream?~
Reason for finding:
There will be no increase in runoff due to this oroiect,
E.' Could the project cause a substantial alteration of
natural land form? ,_
_ Reason for finding:
The grading of the prooert~.~ill maJ;p no chafes in the
land form
F. Could the project cause any significant erosiac, or
' siltation? _ ,~
Reason for finding:
ThPro Trill he no in r as in runoff and dr~,pc~ facilltles
,fie available.
G0
~~~6 ~ ..
c
Yee. "No
G. Could the project cause or exacerbate a violation of
any national or state ambient air quality standard _
• o.r interfere +•rith the maintenance of air quality standards?
Reason for finding:
.The project will ot~irect v nor indirect v resu t
in re ennssron o any new air contannnen
H, Could the project result in a detrimental effect on
water quality or the ability to attain or maintain
water quality standards? ~ ~,
Reason for finding:
The runoff from this pro er v wi no e a tore
nor increase y is pro,~ect.
I. Could the project directly or indirectly cause a
significant increase do ambient noise levels? ___ _
• Reason for finding: ,
The ac uisition of ro ert wi 1 have no effect
on any am lent noise eve .
~
J. Could the project directly or indirectly affect a rare,
endangered or endemic species of animal or plant; or
' habitat of such species; or cause interference t•+ith the
movement of any resident or migratory wildlife? .__ _ ~
Reason for finding:
No such resources are present
K. Could the project directly or indirectly impact any
arciaeological, historical or paleontological resource?
Reason for fi.^.dir.;:
' No such resources are •p resent '
L. Could the project cause a significant degradation of
community aesthetics by imposing structures, colors,
forms, lights or other factors widely at variance with
prevailing conm+unity standards? ._.._
Reason for finding:
There will be no nhysica Grange o ~e pro~cc si e
as a resu o ns acqursi ion o proper y.
e
~~~6 ~ : G1
Ycs ' 't!o
Ft. Could the project a•eate land uses that differ greatly
from those on ad,iacent property due to either scale ._
or type?
Reason for finding:
There will be no direct Grange to an use ue to this
project.
tV. Could the project inhibit the ability of the urban
support system to provide adequate support for the
community or this project?
Reason for finding:
There will be no change in t e eman ore ee~nts o
e ur an suppor system
0. Could the project result in wasteful, inefficient or
unnecessary consumption of energy?
Reason for finding:
No significant change in the consumption of any ener
_pro ucuiq resource or o energy to resu t rom t is
P. Could the project result in the generation of a sub-
stantial amount of solid or liquid waste whictr mould
directly or indirectly cause a violation of any solid
or liquid waste or litter regulations?
Reason for finding:
tlo change in waste prooducl- generation wi res~
rom n s acqu~si ion
" Q. Could the project generate i:raffic that would signifi-
cantly lower the service level of any street or highway
below ar. acceptab]c level? .._._ ~ "
" Reason for finding: •
No traffic trill be genera e
R.~ Are there any other impacts associated with the project
tahich could have a potential to degrade the quality of
tite environment or curtail the range of the environment? _
Reason for finding: •
..~ such resources are present
0
,0 /~ • w G2 ,.
4
2. Evaluation of significant adverse environmental iiapacts which achieve
short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals.
Yes No
A. Is the project clearly inconsistent ~~ith the following
elements of the General Plan?
Land Use
Circulation
Scenic Highways
Conservation
• Flousing
~. Noise
Park & Recreation
Open Space
Safety
Seismic Safety
Public Facilities
Reason for finding:
The rolect conforms to all elements of the General
P an
B. Could the project significantly inhibit access to any
• mineral resources which can be economically extracted?
.Reason for finding:
No such resources are resent
C. Does the project involve an area of presently or
• potentiaiiy productive agriculiurai iand? .
Reasons for finding:
No such resources are present
._._._ L
`_.__ ~
~..
..~ .L.
____ -,~-
_.__..
D. Does the project involve any other natural or man-made
feature ~•rhich is encompassed in long-term environmental
goals as provided in the General Plan?
Reason for finding?
No such resources are present
.... _.
~~~~ ~ •:
•G3 •.
r
3. Evaluation of adverse impacts which are individually limited but
cumulatively significant.
Yes No
' A. Could the project result in a series of impacts that
•interact to produce significant effects?
Reason for finding: '
The impacts due to is proJec are so mtnor utev
prec uce any tnterac ton o a stgntttcan eve .
B. Could the service requirements of the project result
' in secondary projects tftat could have cumulative
effects of a significant level? •
Reasons for finding:
' _ No substantial service requirements ti•rill be recess _:y
• C. Does the project include any facilities or is the
project being carried out under any circumstances that
could facilitate, accelerate or induce other develop-
mentl ~ .___
.Reasons for finding:
' The project trill not resu t to anv Increase in act tty
to ~•rncn ~rou nave grro~r t acce era tnq
c ac errs tcs
. D. Are there any other impacts which could cumulate to a
significant level?
Reasons for finding:
The impacts due to this nroiect are so minor tft v
`preclude anv interaction to a significant leve
c
4. Evaluatitin of significant impacts of the project which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or
indirectly. •
Yes No
A. Could the project involve tiie emission of any substance
which could constitute a significant health hazard? _
Reason for finding:
tlo such substances rn e enn tte y tie pro,7ect.
Q. Is the project located in a flood plain oi• any other
area subject to inundation?
Reason for finding:
No such feature is present
C. Is the project site subject~to any geologic hazard such
as earthquakes, land sliding or liquefaction?
Reason for finding: '
No such feature is presen
0. Is the project site subject to any impacts such as
noise, air pollution, light, etc, that could adversely
IIffect human beings? ~ _ X
Reason for finding:
No such conflicts are presen in e pro,7ec se ing
E. Could the project displace residents or people employed -
at the site?
Reason for finding:
No such resource is present •
F. Could any other adverse impact on human beings result `~-
from the project? 1~
Reason for finding:
No such conflicts are pr~seat in the oroiect Bettina
~•
~~~ 65'