Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1976/08/31 Item 03a,bCITY OF CHULA VISTA ITEM N0. 3ab COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT 8/31 FOR MEETING OF: ITEM TITLE: public hearing - Consideration of precise plan for E1 Rancho del Rey Unit #4 Resolution#8303- Approving precise plan for E1 Rancho del Rey Unit #4 SUBMITTED BY Director of Planning I( >I ITEM EXPLANATION: A. BACKGROUND 1. The 23~ acre site was zoned P-C Planned Community in 1970 and was included in P.U.D. Area "A" which encompassed approximately 300 acres west of Southwestern College. Under that P.U.D. the approwe,d construction for this 23 acre area consisted of 60 cluster housing units and 280 apartments. 2. The developer has submitted a Precise Plan and Development Standards for the same area, proposing to subdivide the property into 83 single family detached home sites. 3. Environmental Impact Report EIR-76-3 was certified by the Planning Commission on July 26, 1976 and forwarded to Council earlier this month. B. DISCUSSION 1. Site Characteristics. The average natural slope of the site is approximately 18%. However, a portion of the westerly and southerly area was previously graded and planted in conjunction with the development of the Larwin subdivision tract. The present manufactured slope will continue easterly along Telegraph Canyon Road blending in with a small natural canyon area located at the east end of the project. EXHIBITS ATTACHED (continued on supplemental page Agreement Resolution x Ordinance Plat Other PCM-76-1. Precise Plar Environmental Document: Attached Submitted on 8/10/76 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Concur with Planning Commission recommendation. Staff's recommendation for approval of the Precise Plan and tentative map is contingent upon the use of the applicant's "park credit" as a compensating factor for the reduced lot size proposed in this development. BOARD/ COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION On August 9, 1976 the Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend to the City Council the approval of the Precise Plan, PCM-76-13, for 83 single family lots on 23~ acres in E1 Rancho del Rey Unit No. 4, in accordance with the attached resolution. COUNCIL ACTIONS Offer of resolution with the condition as indicated by the staff (approval of the Precise Plan and tentative map is contingent upon the use of the applicant's "park credit" as a compensating factor for the reduced lot size in the development) - Failed (Ayes - C. Egdahl,Hyde Noes - C.Cox, Hamilton r - over for amended motion ----- Hobel porn A-iii (Rev 5- AGENDA ITEM N0. 3ab Supplemental page No. 2 2. Development Standards. The P-C zone affords the applicant an opportunity to establish development standards tailored to his particular development. In the standards proposed for E1 Rancho del Rey #4, the applicant is suggesting a departure from some of the more traditional standards by eliminating a minimum lot area, lot width, depth, and coverage. The standards proposed would establish a minimum level pad area of 5,000 sq. ft. with pad coverage for all structures limited to 50% (or 2500 sq. ft. on a 5,000 sq. ft. pad). Minimum average level pad size would consist of a 50% width and a 90' depth. In addition, rear yard areas would be reduced below 20 feet only when a floor plan with side yard orientation resulted in side yard increase from 10 feet to 15 feet. The approach taken by the applicant assures each residence a usable yard area despite varying slope conditions on any given lot. The disadvantage of the approach taken by the applicant is discussed in the next paragraph. 3. Lot Size and Frontage. Standards adopted for detached single family homes (R-1) by the City Council consist of a minimum lot size of 7,000 sq. ft. and minimum lot width of 60 feet. To provide some flexibility the standards provide that 30% of the lots in a tract may be reduced below 7,000 sq. ft., with 1/3 of those lots reduced even further to a minimum of 5,000 sq. ft. The 5,000 sq. ft. lots may utilize a 50 ft. width rather than the 60 feet required for the larger lots. The average size of all lots must equal 7,000 sq. ft. The subject property is located within a P-C zoned area and therefore is not required to adhere to these standards; however, they are valid standards by which to measure proposals for detached single family homes in the P-C zone. The vast majority of lots in E1 Rancho del Ren #4 range in width from 54 feet to 59 feet with 70% of the lots having less than 60 feet of frontage. Narrowing the lot frontage increases the yield and contributes to a more crowded streetscape than might otherwise exist with R-1 standards. 52% of the lots within this subdividion are smaller than 7,000 sq. ft. and 30% are smaller than 6,000 sq. ft. These percentages compare with 30% and 10% allowed, respectively, in the R-1 zone. Approximately 90% of the lots within the subdivision will be able to maintain the 10 ft. and 3 ft. side yard requirements. The maximum pad coverage proposal of 50% for the subdivision compares to a 40% lot coverage established for R-1 standards. Staff agrees that in hillside areas it makes some sense to relate yard areas and lot coverage to pad size rather than to lot size. However, if lot width and lot sizes are ignored in favor of pad sizes which are just large enough to accommodate a particular house plus the required side yard areas, the overall effect is to create a visual feeling of crowdedness. In summary, the lot size and width proposed by the applicant are acceptable only if compensating open space beyond the normal requirements of the ordinance is provided. Unquestionably, the proposed reduced lot widths and areas increases the lot yield to the applicant. Accordingly, it is appropriate for the Council to expect some trade-off in exchange for approval of the "substandard" lots. Inasmuch as this developer has provided more open space (in the form of E1 Rancho del Rey Park) that was required in his previous adjacent developments, and in view of the fact that the park is close by the subject subdivision, it seems logical to consider this open space credit as a trade-off. This is discussed in more detail under the following agenda item (the tentative map). AGENDA ITEM N0. 3ab Supplemental page No. 3 4. Fencing. General standards are proposed for walls and fencing with options provided whereby textured stucco walls (a maximum of 6 ft. in height) may encroach into the traditional front yard areas subject to a minimum 6 ft. setback requirement from the front sidewalk and driveway area, with landscaping required between the wall and the walk areas. This option will afford residents the opportunity to enjoy private front patio areas if they so desire. 5. Floor Plans. The applicant proposes construction with five floor plans and approximately 15 different elevations, ranging from 1900 sq. ft. to 2400 sq. ft. (including 2-car garage). 6. Miscellaneous. The developer has also submitted detailed drawings for a mailbox design and walls/ fences, which are acceptable to staff. In addition the applicant has proposed a height limit on corner lots of 1~ stories which provides a more open feeling when entering a new street. RESOLUTIUN N0. PCi4-76-13 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLAIJIJING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE APPROVAL OF THE PRECISE PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPP1ENT OF EL RANCHO GEL RE1" UNIT N0. 4 WHEREAS, P-C Planned Community zoning was adopted by the City Council in 1970 for the area to the north of Telegraph Canyon Road between Otay Lakes Road and Interstate 805, and WHEREAS, development in the P-C zone requires approval of a precise plan, and WHEREAS, a precise plan and development standards for the development of 23-1/4 acres bordered by Telegraph Canyon Road and Buena Vista Way, designated as E1 Rancho del Rey Unit No. 4, was submitted to the Planning Department on July 9, 1976, and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission adopted znd certified Environmental Impact Report EIR-76-3 for the project on July 26, 1976, and WHEREAS, the City Planniny Commission held a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on July 26 and August 9, 1976, in the Council Chamber, City Hall, to consider said precise plan. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY PLANNING COt-0PIISSION finds as follows: a. That such plan will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity. The plan represents a relatively standard single family subdivision which will comply with all city standards concerning sidewalks and street improvements. The development also conforms to the requirements of EIR~-76-3. b. That such plan satisfies the principle for the application of the P Ptodifying District as set forth in Section 19.56.041. The P Modifying District is necessary to implement any development within the P-C zoned areas of the city (ref. Section 19.14.300 of the 14unicipal Code). c. That any exceptions granted which deviate from the underlyig zoning requirements shall be warranted only when necessary to meet the purpose and application of the P Precise Plan t4odifying District. No specific standards are set forth in the P-C zone, therefore, no deviation has been granted. d. That approval of this plan will conform to the General Plan and the adopted policies of the City. The plan and densities conform to those shown on the adopted General Plan. DE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Planning Commission recommends to the City Council the approval of the Precise Plan for the development of E1 Rancho del Rey Unit No. 4 subject to the following conditions: 7. The Development Standards (as attached) shall be revised as follows: (a) The chart for Sec. 7 C shall read: The follo~,aing setbacks shall be required unless modified by a ' Precise Plan: Yards in Feet Exterior One Both Front Side Yard Side Sides Rear 0 lot line housing 15 15 15 15 20* Lots above 6,000 sq.ft. 15 10 10 13 20* Lots below 6,000 sq.ft. 15 10 5 10 20* / *Rear yards haviny less than 20 feet may be considered where one side yard is increased to a minimum distance of 15 feet for that portion of the floor plan utilizing a positive side yard orientation. 2. Plot plans shall be readjusted prior to the issuance of building permits to 'insure that 10 ft. and 3 ft. side yards will exist on approximately 9C of the subdivision. 3. (a) Fencing shall conform to the standard designs submitted or the criteria specified in the Development Standards. (b) Walls shall be installed by the developer on all corner lots and shall conform to the standards specified for E1 Rancho del Rey P.U.D. Area "A". (c) All fencing and walls shall be maintained in accordance with City standards by the individual home owner. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMi4ISSI0N OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA this 9th day of August, 1976 by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: Commissioners Starr, Pressutti, Smith, Chandler, G. Johnson and Floto NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner R. Johnson / ~ hai ATTEST: ~ ~:~retary P-C PLANNED ~Jh1NiUfUTY ZONE- CITY Of CHU~_„ VISTA DEVELOPMENT STAfvDARDS EUR SINGLE-EAt°IILY RESIDENCE AREAS - EL RANCHO DEt_ REY UNITS 4 AND 5. 1. PURPOSE The purpose of these development standards is to establish regulations for the Planned Community Zone for. the provision of communities primarily for single-family homes and the services appurtenant thereto, and at the same time allowing diversification in the relationships of lot size, building location, fencing and allowable height of buildings and structures while insuring that adequate standards related to the public health, safety and general welfare are observed. 2. PERMITTED USES Principle permitted uses includes: A. One single-family dwelling on any lat. 3. ACCESSORY USES APJD DUILDINGS Accessory uses permitted shall be those defined by Section 19-24-030 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code for the R-1 Zone. 4. CONDITIONAL_ USES Conditional uses permitted shall be those defined by Section 19-Z4-040 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code subject to the same site plan and architectural approval provided therein. 5. SIGN REGULATIONS Sign regulations shall be the same as provided in Section 19-20-050 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code for the R-1 Zone. 6. HEIGHT REGULATIONS No principle building or an interior lot shall exceed two and one-half stories or thirty-five feet in height and on a corner lot shal]: not exceed one and one-half stories or twenty-one feet in height. No accessory building on an interior lot shall exceed one and one-half stories or fifteen feet in height and on a corner lot shall not exceed one story or ten feet in height. Exceptions shall not be made other than as provided in Chapter 19-16 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. 7. AREA. I_OT WIDTH AND YARD REgUIREMENTS No minimum lot area, lot width, or depth is established under these regulations. Criteria fox lot size and dimensions are based on providing the following minimum building pad size and dimensions, which may be divided into two or more levels on the lots the totals of which may be cumulative to meet the minimum requirements. Total difference in elevation between the highest and lowest pad area shall not exceed ten feet. L A, Minimum nuilding Pad Size, 1. Flrea of level pad - 5,000 sq. ft. 2. Minimum average dimensior'is - width 50 feet, depth 90 feet. A. All buildinys, including accessory buildings and structures in the zone shall not cover more than fifty percent of the building pad area. C, Minimum Yard Dimensions: the fallowing combinations of minimum dimensions shall 6e observed; provided however, that such dimensions may be modified by the granting of a conditional use permit, Yards in Feet Front Exterior One Both Rear Side Yard Side Yard Side Yards 15 15 15 15 15 15 10 10 13 .l5 15 10 5 10 15 B. SETBACKS _ GENERAL RE~UIREP9ENTS Front and side yard setback requirements shall 6e provided and maintained in accordance with the schedule set forth hereinabove. Regardless of minim urn side yard requirements as indicated in the schedule, the minimum distance between dwelling units shall be ten feet, with the exception that where two do,~ellings are con- structed with zero setbacks on .a common lot line, the minimum distance between dwelling units at the opposide side from the common lot line shall be twenl;y feet. 9, SETHACI<S -- REAR YARDS - EXCEPTIONS PERMITTED Exceptions fox rear yard setbacks shall be the same as provided in Section 19-Z4-1ZD of the Chula Vista Municipal Code for the R-1 Zone. 10. FLUOR AREA PER_UNIT Minimum floor area shall be the same as provided for in Section 19-24-130 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code for the R-1 Zone. 11. OFF-STREET PARKIPJG• Off-street parking requirements shall 6e the same as provided in Section 19-24-14D ^f the Chula Vista Municipal Code far the R-1 Zone; including provisions for conversions. 12. PE RFORMANCE_STANDARDS All use~e may be subject to the initial. and continued compliance with the performance standards in Chapter 19-G6 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. 13. FFfJCING RE4UIRGh1ENT5 Fencing requirements shall be the same as provided in Section 19-58-15D for the R-1 Zone, with the exceptions that a fence, wall, or-hedge as defined in Paragraph B of tiro hereinbefore CEP ASSOCIATED 5555 hlaynatrnn t3nuleuard, Suite D San Oiegn, California 92711 m (714) 297.-1353 3 Revised 7-26-76 section and a solid wall with textured stucco finish not more than six feet in height may be constructed in a front or exterior side yard subject to the following limitations, A, Front and Exterior Side Yards - Minimum setback from edge of sideo-aalk of six feet and a minimum of seven feet distance from the edge of driveway at a point six feet back of the edge of sidewalk, H, Street Corners - At street intersections setback shall be a ling connecting points six feet from the edge of sidewalk at a point opposite and perpendicular to the point of curb return on each of the intersection streets. C, Landscaping shall be required between the wall, fence or hedge and the sidewalk and maintained in accordance with the re- quirements set forth in the City of Chula Vista Landscape Manual. These exceptions axe established to allow a greater diversity in the provision of private outdoor areas, patios, and courtyards as they relate to indoor living areas of the dwelling. fJlaintainance of fencing and lemdscaping shall be the responsibility of the owner of the property on which it is located in accord- ance with the residential standards of the neighborhood, When an existing wall or fence is increased in height, subject to the height limitations stated herein, such increase in height shall be of a construction to match the design and materials of the existing wall or fence, 14. ADMTtJISTRATTVE PROCEDURES UJhen these development standazds are incorporated in the applica- tion for a planned development permit under the P-C zone, as defined by Section 19.14.300 of the City of Chula Vista Municipal Code, the Planning Commission may waive the requirements that a planned unit development plan and architectural drawings accom- pany the precise plan submission far review and approval at the public hearing for ttre planned development permit. The planned unit development plan and architectural drawings would be subject to administrative review of conformance with these development standards at the time of submission of an application for building permits. rFp nscncinTFn ,555 Mavnatrm, Boulevard. Suite O San pieno. California rJTlll 1714) 292-1353 SNIPES &~ SALERNO CNNSNEEING CIYIE ENfiINEERS AND PIINNERS SUMMARY OF AREAS EL RANCHO DEL REY, UNIT #4 Prepared by: Roger L. Snipes, P.E. August 31, 1976 Total Project Area 23.25 Acres Net Project Area (Excluding Streets) 1 20.38 Acres Average Net Lot Size (20.38 Ac x 43,560 x ~) 10,700 S.F. Area of Major Slopes 5.48 Acres Area of Natural Canyon 1.51 Acres Net Area Excluding Slopes & Canyon 13.39 Acres Total 20.38 Acres Avg. Lot Size Excluding Slopee & Canyon 13.39 x 43,560 x 1 702? S.F. 83 4007 CAMINO DEL RID SOUTH, SUITE 207, SAN DIEGO, CA 9210 B, [714) 283-9121